Man accused of breaking into Amanda Peet’s home acquitted

New York, May 11 (ANI): A man, who was accused of breaking into actress Amanda Peet’s Manhattan home and stealing her jewellery, has been acquitted.

Career criminal Henry Santos would have faced 15 years in prison if he had been convicted of the 2009 intrusion at the Tribeca loft.

Out on 2,000 dollars bail, he didn’t show up for the verdict, but it was not held against him since he was found not guilty.

Peet’s babysitter testified that she walked in on Santos after he pried open a skylight – and that he fled while she grilled him.

But Santos’ lawyer claimed the nanny picked the wrong man out of a line-up and that there was no physical evidence connecting him to the crime.

One juror said the nanny’s description of the perp didn’t impress them.

“She was very vague,” the New York Daily News quoted the juror as saying.

Peet’s screenwriter husband, David Friedman, testified during the trial in Manhattan Supreme Court about the call he got from her after the incident.

“She was pregnant and she was panicked,” he added. (ANI)

Another Patel juror discharged

A third juror has been discharged in the Brisbane manslaughter trial of former Bundaberg surgeon Jayant Patel.

Patel, 59, has pleaded not guilty in the Supreme Court to unlawfully killing three patients and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

A juror was excused on the first day of the trial last week after admitting he formed opinions about issues to be raised during the trial.

A second juror was discharged on Wednesday and replaced by one of three reserve jurors.

Justice John Byrne discharged a third juror this morning after she revealed her employment with Queensland Health.

He told the jury panel that “the reality of, and public appearance of, impartiality are critical”.

Another of the two remaining reserve jurors was empanelled.

Justice Byrne then adjourned the hearing to tomorrow to allow lawyers involved in the trial to resolve legal issues.

Brisbane Supreme Court discharges third juror in Dr. Death”s trial

Brisbane, Mar.29 (ANI): The Supreme Court in Brisbane on Monday discharged a female juror in connection with the manslaughter trial of Indian-born surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel.

The female juror informed Justice John Byrne that she was currently employed on a temporary contract with Queensland Health, and that she hoped to extend the contract when it expired.

Defence barrister Michael Byrne QC asked that she be discharged, and Justice Byrne agreed, the Sydney Morning Herald reports.

“In view of the sensitivity of this case, I have decided, because of her connection with Queensland Health, she should not serve on the jury,” Justice Byrne told the remaining jury members.

He added: “The reality of, and public appearance of impartiality are critical.”

On the first day of the trial last week, a male juror was discharged before any evidence was presented after he said he could not be impartial.

Two days later another male juror was excused after handing the judge a note, the contents of which were not revealed in court.
The discharged jurors have all been replaced with reserve jurors, who were empanelled last Monday.

Only one reserve juror now remains.

Patel, 59, is accused of the manslaughter of Mervyn John Morris, James Edward Phillips and Gerry Kemps.

The former director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital is also accused of causing grievous bodily harm to Ian Rodney Vowles.

Patel has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which relate to his time at the hospital between 2003 and 2005.

The trial has been adjourned until Tuesday for legal argument. (ANI)

‘Dr. Death’ jury asked whether prejudiced by prior knowledge of doctor’s publicity

Melbourne, Mar 22 (ANI): Brisbane Supreme Court Justice John Byrne today asked on the first day of the trial the 12 jury members to consider whether they may have been prejudiced by any exposure to pre-trial publicity about former Indian-origin surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death”.

The three reserve jurors were also asked the same question.

“There has been publicity, in particular in newspapers and on television, about this accused and events that occurred some years ago at the Bundaberg Hospital where Jayant Patel worked,” Justice Byrne said.

“It’s whether because of your exposure to such publicity, or for that matter any other material, you either have, or might fairly be thought by others … to have formed an opinion about the accused.

“If you do not have an open mind … then you should not be a juror and should be excused from this jury,” News.com.au quoted Justice Byrne, as saying.

The jury has been sent to the jury room during the mid-morning break to reflect upon whether they should excuse themselves from sitting on the case when court resumes.

Former surgeon Patel, 59, has pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of patients Mervyn John Morris, James Edward Phillips and Gerry Kemps, News.com.au reports.

He has also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to Ian Rodney Vowles.

The charges relate to his time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005. (ANI)

Ohio Jury Finds Doctor Guilty of Wife’s Cyanide Poisoning Death

CLEVELAND — An Ohio doctor accused of lacing his wife’s calcium supplement with cyanide so he could be with his mistress was convicted Friday of aggravated murder.

The jury heard weeks of testimony before returning the verdict against Dr. Yazeed Essa, 41. His wife, Rosemarie Essa, collapsed while driving Feb. 24, 2005, and crashed her car into another vehicle about five miles from the couple’s home.

Essa was an emergency room doctor in Akron but fled to Lebanon after his wife’s death. Last year, he gave up an extradition fight and was returned from Cyprus to Ohio. With Friday’s verdict, he now faces a maximum sentence of life in prison, with the possibility of parole after 20 years.

As the verdict was announced, family members of Rosemarie Essa held hands. Some cried and one quietly said “Oh” when the verdict was read. After jurors left the courtroom, the victim’s family hugged police and prosecutors.

Her brother, Dominic DiPuccio, said the family was delighted with the jury’s decision.

Deputies stepped forward and handcuffed the doctor. He turned to his brother and other family members, and nodded. He flexed his fingers of his cuffed hands as Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Deena Calabrese set sentencing for Tuesday.

While leaving the courtroom, defense attorney Mark Marein said: “We’re disappointed.” Essa’s relatives would not comment.

Assistant Prosecutor Steve Dever said the state had a good case and the jury accepted the circumstantial evidence. He noted that the jury at one point requested to see one of the cyanide-laced calcium pills.

“I think they wanted to get the pill to actually figure out how you could do it, the mechanics of actually unloading the one calcium pill then putting it together again so it wouldn’t be noticed,” he said.

A juror who, with others on the panel, spoke to reporters after the verdict said jurors were surprised by Essa’s stone-faced demeanor throughout the trial, especially when photos of his wife and two children were presented. The doctor’s reaction was “no expression, no tears, nothing,” she said.

During the trial, prosecutors argued that Essa was trying to escape a loveless marriage and wanted to live with his mistress. The defense portrayed the doctor as easily moving between mistresses and a storybook life with a wife, two children and personal wealth. The defense claimed a mistress wanted to marry the doctor and had a motive to kill his wife.

But Essa’s brother, who had testified earlier that the defendant denied poisoning his wife, returned to the witness stand later to change his testimony, telling jurors the defendant admitted to the killing.

Firas Essa said the admission came in 2006 at a Cyprus jail, where Yazeed Essa was detained after fleeing the U.S. Firas Essa said he changed his testimony to avoid the risk of perjury and obstruction charges and potential prison time.

A nurse who was the defendant’s mistress testified that Essa asked before his wife’s death if she would stay “if something bad were to happen.”

Essa wore his wedding band throughout the trial, but did not testify, apparently changing his mind at the last minute after the judge encouraged him to think it over.

Rosemarie Essa, 38, died after taking the calcium tablet and crashing her SUV into an oncoming car near the couple’s home in Gates Mills. No one was injured in the other vehicle. Yazeed Essa, a Detroit native whose family is from a Palestinian territory, was an emergency room doctor at Akron General Medical Center and fled to Lebanon after police seized drug bottles at his home.

Judge denies new trial for Anand Jon

New York, July 7 (ANI): A judge has denied a request for a new trial for Indian-born fashion designer Anand Jon.

His lawyers asked for a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct, saying a juror had improperly contacted Jon’s sister.

In his ruling, LA Superior Court Judge David Wesley did find that the juror and Alexander’s sister acted inappropriately and held both in contempt of court. However, Wesley ruled that their contact did not taint the verdicts.

Wesley said that, under California law, “a new trial will not be granted where there is a misconduct of such a trifling nature,” reports the New York Post.

“This is a total travesty of justice,” Jon said.

Jon is to be sentenced next month. (ANI)

Prosecutorial team in Anand Jon case may have committed perjury

Los Angeles, April 7 (ANI): Each testimony in the latest hearing on prosecutorial misconduct in Anand Jon case was contradictory, fuelling claims that the Indian fashion designer has been a victim of unfair trial.

During the hearing, Brian Bennett, the supervising investigator on the case for the Los Angeles district attorney’s office, admitted that a juror was stopped from meeting Jon’s sister Sanjana, reports LA Weekly.

Bennett testified that Juror No. 12 was intercepted on his way to the meeting because he knew the defence would place a wire on Sanjana and record the meeting at a coffee shop.

DDA Mara McIlvain testified that she did not even know about the decision to ‘intercept the juror’.

However, Bennett took the stand to reveal that McIlvain was lying under oath as he stated that though the investigative team made the decision it was first discussed with both McIlvain and DDA Francis Young.

He also said that both DDA’s did not inform him that the court had in fact authorized the vital sting operation nor mentioned the fact that Judge Wesley himself raised concerns about possible extortion plot.

Contrary to McIlvain’s testimony, Bennett stated that both the prosecutors were involved in the planning meeting to subvert the defense investigation.

DA investigators Laurie Devine and Chris Turpin then took the stand. Each contradicted the previous testimony of their bosses. Investigator Turpin verified that both DDA’s were in the room and gave ‘instructions’ regularly throughout this case.

However, Investigator Devine stated that neither DDA was present.

After the proceedings where these prosecutors were caught in their own schemes and lies under oath, defense attorney Leonard Levine said: “This gives new meaning to the phrase ‘win at any cost’; such blatant misconduct should cause the recusal of the entire DA’s office, at the same time granting Anand Jon a new trial.” (ANI)

Investigator admits stopping juror from meeting Anand Jon’s sister

Los Angeles, Apr 3 (ANI): Anand Jon’s case has taken a new twist with an investigator appointed by the District Attorney’s office admitting that a juror was stopped from meeting the Indian fashion designer’s sister.

Brian Bennett, the supervising investigator on the case for the Los Angeles district attorney’s office, testified that it was his decision to intercept Juror No. 12 on his way to the meeting.

The reason Bennett gave was that he knew the defence would place a wire on Jon’s sister Sanjana and record the meeting at a coffee shop, reports LA weekly.

Juror No. 12 has yet to be called into court and questioned under oath.

The next hearing, with more D.A. witnesses, is scheduled for April 17. (ANI)

Anand Jon’s attorney has never seen jurors meeting accuseds’ families before

Washington, Mar 4 (ANI): Indian designer Anand Jon’s defense attorney Leonard Levine is demanding a fresh trial in his rape case after reports surfaced that at least one or more jurors contacted the defendant’s family more than once.

“I’ve never seen anything like this in my 25+ years practicing law,” said Levine.

Anand Jon’s last hearing was on February 27, 2009 in Department 102 of the LA Criminal Courts Building in front of Honorable David S. Wesley.

Currently, the recently filed defense motions are under wraps. But, pertinent clues to those motions were discussed in court, reports IndiaPost.com.

“The motions are under seal and still cannot be discussed at this time. We trust that the court will do the right thing by granting these motions. We are enthusiastic for a new trial for Anand Jon, a trial that will send an innocent man back home to his family,” Levine said.

Earlier, Anand Jon’s attorneys had asked for a new trial in his case after prosecutors stopped a juror who reportedly tried to meet with the Indian fashion designer’s sister before a judgment was passed, according to reports.

Also the designer’s attorneys claimed that during the trial prosecutors twice threatened a member of their team, Eric Chase – once with arrest and, at another point, with disbarment. (ANI)

Anand Jon’s attorneys say there has to be new trial as per case law

Los Angeles, Mar 2 (ANI): Indian-born fashion designer Anand Jon’s attorneys insist that his case should be heard afresh because they were not given a fair chance to find out why some jurors contacted the defendant’s family more than once, something that demands a new trial according to the law.

Defense attorneys Leonard Levine and Ronald Richards say whatever might have been the reasons for them contacting Jon’s family, there has to be a new trial as per the case law.

They said that the prosecution destroyed any chance of a fair trial by not letting the truth come out.

“But for the District Attorneys blocking the door to justice…we would have found out why the juror contacted (the defendant’s sister),” LA Weekly quoted Richards as saying in a new conference.

“There is still a considerable amount of discovery that needs to be uncovered,” Richards added. (ANI)

Anand Jon’s attorneys say there has to be new trial as per case law

Los Angeles, Mar 2 (ANI): Indian-born fashion designer Anand Jon’s attorneys insist that his case should be heard afresh because they were not given a fair chance to find out why some jurors contacted the defendant’s family more than once, something that demands a new trial according to the law.

Defense attorneys Leonard Levine and Ronald Richards say whatever might have been the reasons for them contacting Jon’s family, there has to be a new trial as per the case law.

They said that the prosecution destroyed any chance of a fair trial by not letting the truth come out.

“But for the District Attorneys blocking the door to justice…we would have found out why the juror contacted (the defendant’s sister),” LA Weekly quoted Richards as saying in a new conference.

“There is still a considerable amount of discovery that needs to be uncovered,” Richards added. (ANI)

Glaring irregularities raise hope for Anand Jon case re-trial

Washington, Feb 28 (ANI): Anand Jon Alexander’s attorneys are demanding a fresh trial in his rape case after prosecutors stopped a juror who reportedly tried to meet with the Indian fashion designer’s sister before a judgment was passed, it has emerged.

All motions in context of the proposed meeting are currently under wraps, however, the story came out in bits today inside Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David S. Wesley’s courtroom, reports a blog on LA Weekly.

During deliberations, as per Wesley and Alexander’s defense attorneys, a male juror contacted a defense investigator to set up a meeting with Alexander’s sister Sanjana Jon at Starbucks, according to reports.

A recording device on Alexander’s sister was put by a defense investigator and she was sent to Starbucks, but the juror was “intercepted” by District Attorney investigators before the meeting could take place.

Deputy District Attorney Mara Mcllvain made no comments, and the District Attorney’s Office’ representative said there would be no comment since the matter is under seal.

Defense attorney Ronald Richards said he will request that Wesley subpoena all e-mails and messages within the District Attorney’s Office regarding the decision to stop the juror before the meeting.

Also, Jon’s attorneys claim that during the trial prosecutors twice threatened a member of their team, Eric Chase – once with arrest and, at another point, with disbarment.

The defense contends that the threats were acts of intimidation that lowered Chase’s level of aggressiveness during cross-examination of prosecution witnesses. (ANI)

Gyllenhaal faces jury service as part of misdemeanour battery trial

Washington, January 28 (ANI): Hollywood actor Jake Gyllenhaal was reportedly seen checking in at a Los Angeles court as part of the jury selection process on Tuesday, in connection with an upcoming misdemeanour battery trial.

According to TMZ.com, the 28-year-old star went through court questioning in a private room to determine juror suitability.

He will be returning to court on Wednesday to find out whether he has been picked, reports Contactmusic.

Madonna was considered for jury service in the city last year, but was dismissed by the judge during the selection process.

Actors Forest Whitaker and Don Cheadle also managed to escape the civic duty.

However, Steve Carell was elected to serve on a jury during an employment dispute case in January last year. (ANI)