Witness admits Dr “Death” Patel’s procedure value judgment not incompetence

Melbourne, May 19 (ANI): An expert witness in Bundaberg Hospital surgeon Dr Jayant “Death” Patel’s case has denied claims that he unjustly criticized him for failing to insert a fluid monitoring line into a patient after Patel’s lawyer acquainted him with the fact that there were a number of perfectly reasonable explanations for him not having done so.

The witness, Dr John Allsop had claimed on Tuesday that it would be “bread and butter” for a competent surgeon to insert the line.

Patel’s lawyer Michael Byrne said Patel”s decision to send the patient, James Phillips, to intensive care without a central venous line was a value judgment not incompetence, The Courier-Mail reports.

In a hasty retraction from his previous stand, Allsop said: “As I said in one of my reports it is difficult to make equivocal judgment unless you are hovering over one”s shoulder.”

Patel is not charged with any criminal offence regarding his oesophagectomy on Grave but prosecutors led evidence about it because they claimed it should have been a warning to Patel, the paper said.

Byrne also asked Allsop about reports he had compiled for the Health Rights Commission in 2005, which did not contain some of the evidence Dr Allsop had given at the trial.

Allsop conceded that there were things he may not have fully considered in his original report. (ANI)

Anaesthetist says a patient of Dr. Death was ”poisoned by too much potassium”

Brisbane (Australia), Apr.19 (ANI): The Brisbane trial of former Bundaberg surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. `Dr. Death’, has heard that a patient”s heart was poisoned by injection of too much potassium.

While Patel, 60, has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients, including renal patient James Phillips, 46, and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth man, anaesthetist Dr Martin Carter has told the trial that in his review of an electro cardiogram, Phillips”s heart was poisoned by potassium.

Patel”s trial has previously heard that Phillips was given Hartmann”s solution, which contains a high level of potassium, and too much potassium was a problem for renal patients.

During the cross examination, according to ABC, Dr. Carter also told the trial he did not believe the operation was too risky to be performed at Bundaberg or he would have spoken to Patel.

He also agreed that the lack of effective dialysis of Phillips caused his death.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Patel failed to tell Bundaberg Base Hospital”s senior anaesthetist about surgical restrictions placed on him in the United States due to repeated negligence.

Giving evidence in the Supreme Court in Brisbane today, Martin Carter said the surgeon told him he was able to competently perform an oesophagectomy on James Edward Phillips in May 2003.

“In terms of this specific case [Dr Patel] said he was capable of performing it,” Dr Carter said.

“He said he”d done them in the States and I had no reason to disbelieve him,” he added.

However, Dr Carter said he had no idea Dr Patel had been banned from performing oesohagectomies and some abdominal operations in the US without seeking a second opinion.

“Did he tell you anything about his disciplinary history in Oregon?” prosecutor Ross Martin asked.

“No,” Dr Carter said.

“Did you know anything about that?”

“No.”

Earlier during the trial, the court was told that Dr Patel signed an order in August 2000 that acknowledged he “had made surgical errors” that equated to “gross negligence” while he was working in the US.

Dr Patel, 60, is accused of causing the deaths of three Queensland patients – including Phillips – and permanently injuring another when he performed these types of operations while employed as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005.

The trial continues. (ANI)

Anaesthetist says a patient of Dr. Death was ”poisoned by too much potassium”

Brisbane (Australia), Apr.19 (ANI): The Brisbane trial of former Bundaberg surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. `Dr. Death’, has heard that a patient”s heart was poisoned by injection of too much potassium.

While Patel, 60, has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients, including renal patient James Phillips, 46, and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth man, anaesthetist Dr Martin Carter has told the trial that in his review of an electro cardiogram, Phillips”s heart was poisoned by potassium.

Patel”s trial has previously heard that Phillips was given Hartmann”s solution, which contains a high level of potassium, and too much potassium was a problem for renal patients.

During the cross examination, according to ABC, Dr. Carter also told the trial he did not believe the operation was too risky to be performed at Bundaberg or he would have spoken to Patel.

He also agreed that the lack of effective dialysis of Phillips caused his death.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Patel failed to tell Bundaberg Base Hospital”s senior anaesthetist about surgical restrictions placed on him in the United States due to repeated negligence.

Giving evidence in the Supreme Court in Brisbane today, Martin Carter said the surgeon told him he was able to competently perform an oesophagectomy on James Edward Phillips in May 2003.

“In terms of this specific case [Dr Patel] said he was capable of performing it,” Dr Carter said.

“He said he”d done them in the States and I had no reason to disbelieve him,” he added.

However, Dr Carter said he had no idea Dr Patel had been banned from performing oesohagectomies and some abdominal operations in the US without seeking a second opinion.

“Did he tell you anything about his disciplinary history in Oregon?” prosecutor Ross Martin asked.

“No,” Dr Carter said.

“Did you know anything about that?”

“No.”

Earlier during the trial, the court was told that Dr Patel signed an order in August 2000 that acknowledged he “had made surgical errors” that equated to “gross negligence” while he was working in the US.

Dr Patel, 60, is accused of causing the deaths of three Queensland patients – including Phillips – and permanently injuring another when he performed these types of operations while employed as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005.

The trial continues. (ANI)

Patel patient too frail for surgery, court hears

A Queensland court has been told that Jayant Patel should not have operated on a patient because he was too frail.

Former Bundaberg surgeon Patel has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

The Supreme Court in Brisbane heard that James Phillips, 46, died two days after Patel removed part of his oesophagus after throat cancer was found in 2003.

The court heard that Mr Phillips had existing health problems including renal failure, heart disease, blood pressure problems and previous blood infections.

Renal specialist Dr Peter Miach told the court he would not have operated on Mr Phillips because he was too frail.

Dr Miach, who was treating Mr Phillips for end-stage renal failure, said he would have consulted with numerous specialists before even considering surgery.

And Dr Miach said he would have expected Patel to consult him about his intention to perform an oesophagectomy on Mr Phillips.

“To what extent would you have expected a surgeon who was going to undertake an operation on your patient to discuss it with you?” prosecutor Ross Martin, SC, asked.

“I would have expected it 100 per cent,” Dr Miach replied.

“That’s the done thing when you have a complex patient.”

The trial has previously heard Patel should not have operated on Mr Phillips because of Bundaberg Hospital’s limited intensive care capacity.

The trial continues.

Patel’s prosecution costs $2.75m so far: Government

The Queensland Government has revealed it has spent more than $2.75 million on the prosecution of former Bundaberg-based surgeon Jayant Patel.

Patel, 59, has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients and to causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth man during his time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg hospital in southern Queensland.

In response to a Question on Notice from the Member for Bundaberg, Jack Dempsey, the Government says it has budgeted just over $3 million for the trial, with $2.75 million already spent.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court trial in Brisbane today has heard Patel assured a patient of good outcomes from a complex surgical procedure, but the patient died two days after the operation.

James Phillips, 46, was in renal failure in 2003 when Patel removed part of his oesophagus to treat a throat cancer.

Mr Phillips died two days later.

Bundaberg hospital renal nurse Carolyn Waters gave evidence about a conversation between Mr Phillips and Patel prior to the surgery.

She told the court Patel assured Mr Phillips that he had previously had good outcomes from the procedure and Bundaberg hospital could provide the necessary care afterwards.

But she says he did not tell Mr Phillips he might die.

Another nurse has told the court that Patel described a detailed note in a patient’s file before surgery as necessary because of the chance of a lawsuit.

Nurse Mandy McDonald told the trial when she commented about a detailed note Patel wrote about Mr Phillips before surgery, he replied it was necessary because ‘you never knew when you might get sued’.

Patel trial adjourns

The Brisbane manslaughter trial of former Bundaberg-based surgeon Jayant Patel has been adjourned.

Patel, 59, has pleaded not guilty in the Supreme Court in Brisbane to unlawfully killing three people and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

Yesterday, the prosecution moved on to the next stage of the trial with evidence about the death of 46-year-old James Phillips.

The trial was to resume this morning with further evidence about Mr Phillips from the director of renal medicine, Dr Peter Miach.

Mr Phillips died in 2003 after undergoing surgery for throat cancer.

But Justice John Byrne today told the jury it would not be required today due to matters raised by Patel’s defence team.

Renal doctor to front Patel trial

The director of renal medicine at the Bundaberg Base Hospital in southern Queensland is expected to continue giving evidence at Jayant Patel’s Brisbane manslaughter trial today.

Patel, 59, has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients, including James Phillips, 46, and to causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth man.

Bundaberg hospital renal medicine director, Dr Peter Miach, was involved in the treatment of Mr Phillips, who was in the final stages of renal failure when Patel operated on him.

Yesterday, colorectal surgeon Dr Brian Collopy gave evidence about his treatment review of former Patel patient, Mervyn Morris, 75.

Mr Morris died three weeks after Patel removed part of his colon at the Bundaberg Base Hospital in 2003.

Dr Collopy told the court yesterday that Patel’s surgery on Mr Morris before identifying the source of rectal bleeding was inappropriate.

Dr Collopy also said there was time for further investigations before surgery if it was still thought necessary.

He also told the trial he believes Mr Morris suffered rectal bleeding because he had radiation proctitis which often occurs in patients who receive radiation treatment on their prostate.

During cross-examination yesterday by Patel’s defence barrister, Michael Byrne QC, Dr Collopy defended his conclusion that Patel’s surgery on Mr Morris was premature and inappropriate.

However, Dr Collopy agreed with Mr Byrne that his review was based on patient charts by Bundaberg hospital staff he had never met.

“Dr. Death” Jayant Patel faced disciplinary action in US in 2000: Brisbane SC told

Brisbane, Mar 23(ANI): Former Indian-origin surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death” was disciplined by an American medical body in August 2000 for “gross acts of negligence”, the Brisbane Supreme Court has been told.

Prosecutor Ross Martin told the court that Dr. Patel, who has pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps, had been practicing as a surgeon in Oregon in 2000.

He said that in August 2000, three years before taking employment at Bundaberg Base Hospital, Dr. Patel was the subject of a stipulation order from the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners restricting his participation in major operations including an oesophagectomy and certain abdominal procedures.

“His career took something of a hurdle in Oregon,” The Courier Mail quoted Martin, as saying.

The court was told that the board placed the order on Dr. Patel after he made errors in previous operations.

Reading from a copy of the order, Martin said: “The board proposes to take disciplinary action against (Patel) for violations of the medical practices act … and gross acts of negligence.”

He further said that Bundaberg Base Hospital’s staff had been unaware of the American body’s disciplinary action against Dr. Patel.

Dr. Patel has also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to Ian Rodney Vowles.

The charges relate to his time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005. (ANI)

“Dr. Death” Jayant Patel lacked experience for major surgery: Brisbane SC told

Brisbane, Mar 23(ANI): The Brisbane Supreme Court has been told that former Indian-origin surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death” lacked the experience or medical support facilities to undertake major surgery on a patient who later died.

Prosecutor Ross Martin was speaking at the trial of Dr. Patel, who has pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps.

The charges relate to Patel’s time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005.

Martin said that 46-year-old patient James Edward Phillips was in the end stage of renal failure in May 2003 when Dr. Patel decided to perform an oesophagectomy.

He said that medical exploration before the operation had discovered a “concerning” nodule in Phillips’ oesophagus, and other doctors only recommended biopsies and further assessment. Despite these complications, Dr. Patel decided to perform “a huge operation”, which the Crown is alleging led to Phillips’ death two days later.

The court was also told that medical evidence would show Dr. Patel did not possess the required experience to perform the operation, News.com.au reports.

Martin further stressed that the Bundaberg Base Hospital did not have the necessary facilities to support such a major operation, and said: “The operation required a much higher level of care than was available at Bundaberg.” (ANI)

“Dr. Death” Jayant Patel faced disciplinary action in US in 2000: Brisbane SC told

Brisbane, Mar 23(ANI): Former Indian-origin surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death” was disciplined by an American medical body in August 2000 for “gross acts of negligence”, the Brisbane Supreme Court has been told.

Prosecutor Ross Martin told the court that Dr. Patel, who has pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps, had been practicing as a surgeon in Oregon in 2000.

He said that in August 2000, three years before taking employment at Bundaberg Base Hospital, Dr. Patel was the subject of a stipulation order from the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners restricting his participation in major operations including an oesophagectomy and certain abdominal procedures.

“His career took something of a hurdle in Oregon,” The Courier Mail quoted Martin, as saying.

The court was told that the board placed the order on Dr. Patel after he made errors in previous operations.

Reading from a copy of the order, Martin said: “The board proposes to take disciplinary action against (Patel) for violations of the medical practices act … and gross acts of negligence.”

He further said that Bundaberg Base Hospital’s staff had been unaware of the American body’s disciplinary action against Dr. Patel.

Dr. Patel has also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to Ian Rodney Vowles.

The charges relate to his time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005. (ANI)

“Dr. Death” Jayant Patel lacked experience for major surgery: Brisbane SC told

Brisbane, Mar 23(ANI): The Brisbane Supreme Court has been told that former Indian-origin surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death” lacked the experience or medical support facilities to undertake major surgery on a patient who later died.

Prosecutor Ross Martin was speaking at the trial of Dr. Patel, who has pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps.

The charges relate to Patel’s time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital between 2003 and 2005.

Martin said that 46-year-old patient James Edward Phillips was in the end stage of renal failure in May 2003 when Dr. Patel decided to perform an oesophagectomy.

He said that medical exploration before the operation had discovered a “concerning” nodule in Phillips’ oesophagus, and other doctors only recommended biopsies and further assessment. Despite these complications, Dr. Patel decided to perform “a huge operation”, which the Crown is alleging led to Phillips’ death two days later.

The court was also told that medical evidence would show Dr. Patel did not possess the required experience to perform the operation, News.com.au reports.

Martin further stressed that the Bundaberg Base Hospital did not have the necessary facilities to support such a major operation, and said: “The operation required a much higher level of care than was available at Bundaberg.” (ANI)

‘Dr. Death’ to face separate trials on charges

Brisbane (Australia), May 25 (ANI): Former Bundaberg Hospital surgeon Jayant Patel will face separate trials on fraud and manslaughter charges.

In a pre-trial review today the Crown agreed the eight fraud charges Dr Patel is facing should be heard at a separate trial from the three manslaughter and two grievous bodily harm charges he also faces.

However, a Supreme Court judge will have to decide whether the five non-fraud charges should also be heard in individual trials.

According to the Daily Telegraph, prosecutor Ross Martin told today’s hearing the Crown would not oppose a severing of fraud and other charges.

He said, however, the Crown believed the manslaughter and grievous bodily harm charges should remain “joined” for a trial.

Martin said defence lawyers had yet to indicate whether they would seek judge only trials for all or some of the charges.

He said there could be problems with the application to separate the manslaughter and grievous bodily harm charges, if the defence sought a judge only trial.

However, Michael Byrne QC said under the relevant section of law it would be irrelevant if the trials were judge only or jury.

He did not say if the defence had decided on whether to apply for judge only trials but he did indicate any application, if made, would be on the grounds of prejudice and unfairness.

Justice John Byrne said the matters had a public interest and it was important to get them before a court as soon as possible.

Dr Patel was committed to stand trial on the 13 counts in April. Patel, 59, who worked at the hospital between 2003 and 2005, faces charges of the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps. (ANI)

Dr. Death to face trial for manslaughter on 14 charges

Melbourne, Apr 20 (ANI): Controversial Indian-born surgeon, Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a ‘Dr. Death’, who is currently facing a committal hearing into allegations of manslaughter over the deaths of three patients, will stand trial on 14 charges involving the death of three people.

Former Bundaberg Base Hospital surgeon Patel will also face trial on charges of causing serious injury to two others and fraud in getting his job in Queensland.

Michael Woodward, counsel for Patel, consented to the charges being committed to the Supreme Court for trial on a yet to be determined date.

The Crown is expected to present an indictment charging Patel with the offences in the Supreme Court on Friday. Patel’s committal resumed today for cross-examination of a witness, The Courier Mail reports.

It was then expected that Crown Prosecutors and Patel’s lawyers would make written and oral submissions before Deputy Chief Magistrate Brian Hine would make a decision.

However, at the end of cross-examination Woodward said he had instructions to consent to the charges being committed up to the Supreme Court.

Judge Hine said he still had to decide whether there was enough evidence to commit Patel on all charges.

After reading the charges to Patel he then determined the matters should go trial.

When asked if he had anything to say, Patel replied: “No thank you, sir.” Patel did not enter a formal plea.

Patel, 59, worked at the hospital between 2003 and 2005, faced charges, of the manslaughter of James Phillips, Mervyn Morris and Gerardus Kemps. (ANI)

Mehsud’s threat to target White House is credible: Terrorism experts

Washington, Apr 1 (ANI): The threat given by Pakistan Taliban commander Baitullah Mehsud to target the White House and other important places in the United States must be taken seriously, terrorism experts have said.

Mehsud told a foreign news agency on Tuesday that soon he would launch an attack in Washington that will amaze everyone in the world.

Experts call Mehsud a “rising young star” who is linked both to the assassination of former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and the September 2008 bombing that killed 54 people in the Marriott hotel in Islamabad.

FOX News quoted them as saying that Mehsud’s threat to carry out an attack in Washington should not be discounted.

“It should be taken seriously because [Mehsud] has ordered the deaths of many Pakistanis and Afghans and has a close alliance with al Qaeda,” said James Phillips, a terrorism expert and senior research fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Heritage Foundation.

“It’s not too much of a stretch to think he might be involved in an attack on the US if he’s able to get his followers inside the United States. He’s a militant extremist whose threats cannot be ignored.”hillips said Mehsud is less of a direct threat to the US than Osama bin Laden in an ideological sense, but his influence in Pakistan could allow him to tap into existing networks within al Qaeda or among Afghan Taliban militants to achieve his goals.

Steve Emerson, executive director of The Investigative Project on Terrorism, said that of the many terrorists who have issued “blustery threats” in recent years, Meshud is considered a “rising young star” among militants.

“He’s a dangerous guy. It just reaffirms the fact that Washington is a major target. He seems to be a pretty bloody, bold guy who is not afraid to have a marker on himself and knows how to exact publicity … The real issue is what US intelligence knows,” Emerson said.

Malou Innocent, a foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute, said Mehsud’s attacks have significantly altered the political dynamics in Pakistan and provide a major test for President Asif Ali Zardari. But any direct threat Mehsud poses to the United States will be through his link with Al Qaeda, she said.

“If he did have the reach, it would be because of al Qaeda. This is more posturing on his behalf,” she said. (ANI)

Don’t let Patel operate, doctor warned colleagues

Brisbane, Feb.20 (ANI): A senior doctor at Queensland’s Bundaberg Base Hospital warned staff before he went on holidays that they shouldn’t let controversial Indian-born surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel perform operations.

Dr. Peter Miach told a Brisbane magistrate’s court on Friday that he had suspicions about the quality of Dr Patel’s work after a general review showed the US-trained doctor botched every single catheter insertion he’d performed at Bundaberg Base Hospital.

Dr Miach, who was director of medicine and head of the renal unit when Dr Patel started working there in 2003, said he immediately arranged for catheter insertions to be outsourced to a private hospital.

He said he also instructed two locums who were filling in for him when he went overseas not to let Dr Patel perform surgery.

“(I told them) ‘I would get surgery done by other people’,” Dr Miach told Dr Patel’s committal hearing in the Brisbane Magistrates Court today.

He also said he did not believe Dr Patel should have operated on patient James Phillips, who died after an oesophagectomy to treat cancer in 2003.

Dr Patel, 58, faces a total of 13 charges, including two other counts of manslaughter, over his time as director of surgery at the hospital between 2003 and 2005.

Earlier today, another doctor complained Dr Patel did not consult with her before treating one of her patients.

Jennifer Crane said she was “very surprised” when she learned Gerry Kemps had agreed to an oesophagectomy at the hospital in 2004.

She said Mr Kemps, who died following the operation performed by Dr Patel, was a high risk patient who needed treatment in a major metropolitan hospital. (ANI)

‘Dr. Death’ should have chosen safer options for treating his patients

Brisbane (Australia), Feb.16 (ANI): Controversial Indian-born surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel should have considered safer treatment options for a patient who died after an operation, a Brisbane court has heard.

Patel, 58, has been charged with the manslaughter of James Phillips and two other patients.

He was the director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital in Queensland between 2003 and 2005, and faces an additional 10 charges including fraud and grievous bodily harm, reports news.com.au.

Giving evidence on Monday via video link from Adelaide, renowned oesophagectomy specialist Dr Glyn Jamieson told the court Patel should have considered other, safer treatment options for Mr Phillips.

He said Patel should first have performed an endoscopic ultrasound.

This, he said, would have indicated the cancer was superficial and required only partial removal of the oesophagus, rather than a full oesophagectomy.

Dr Jamieson said this procedure was less serious and, therefore, more suitable for a patient like Phillips, who was already seriously unwell with kidney failure.

Dr. Jamieson also told the court he didn’t believe oesophagectomies should necessarily have been carried out at hospitals like Bundaberg, which has a low level of intensive care support for post-operative patients.

“It should have been performed where there was a higher level of support,” he said.

Dr Jamieson said an experienced surgeon needed to perform the procedure 10 times a year in a high level support hospital in order to maintain his skills.

The court was told Patel performed just five oesophagectomies in 21 months at the Bundaberg Base Hospital.

The hearing will resume on Tuesday when nurse unit manager Toni Hoffman, who blew the whistle on Patel’s alleged negligent actions, will give evidence.(ANI)

‘Dr. Death’ ‘lied to families’ about the surgeries he conducted, says nurse

Brisbane (Australia), Feb.12 (ANI): Indian-born surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel a.k.a. “Dr. Death” lied to the families of patients he operated upon, claimed a nurse.

Bundaberg Base Hospital intensive care unit nurse Karen Stumer told a Brisbane Magistrates Court here today that Patel often lied about the success of his operations, even as his patients’ health was deteriorating.

The news.com.au quoted Stumer as telling the court that she overheard Dr.Patel telling the family of James Phillips that he was stable after an oesophagacetomy in May 2003.

Stumer said this concerned nursing staff, as they knew he was in a very serious condition.

“He wasn’t improving, he was actually deteriorating,” she said.

Phillips died just days after Dr Patel’s operation.

Patel, 58, is facing 14 charges, including three of manslaughter, relating to his time as director of surgery at the Bundaberg hospital from 2003 to 2005.

Stumer told the court she recalled Dr Patel making similarly positive comments to other families of very sick patients. Dr Patel also, she said, recorded incorrect information on patients’ charts to show a stable or improving condition.

“Did those patients recover?” crown prosecutor David Meredith asked.

“They were extremely unwell. Most of them died,” Stumer said.tumer also said Dr Patel rarely listened to the advice of his colleagues and that he often refused to transfer patients to Brisbane because he wanted to treat them himself.

She said other staff members would organise transfers on weekends when Dr Patel wasn’t there so as to avoid conflict.

The court earlier heard Dr Patel accused nurses of trying to hold up his theatre when they drew his attention to the excessive bleeding of a patient, who later died.

The hearing continues. (ANI)

Dr. Death’s surgical procedures cost patients’ lives, Brisbane court told

Brisbane (Australia), Feb.9 (ANI): Indian-trained surgeon Dr. Jayant Patel carried out a series of badly considered and poorly performed surgeries that cost the lives of three patients, a magistrate’s court here was told on Monday.
The 58-year-old Patel is facing 14 charges, including three counts of manslaughter, two of grievous bodily harm, an alternative charge of a negligent act causing harm, and eight counts of fraud from his time as director of surgery at Bundaberg Base Hospital in Queensland between 2003 and 2005, reports news.com.au

Prosecutor Ross Martin today told a committal hearing in the Brisbane Magistrates Court that Dr.Patel had misdiagnosed patients, performed surgeries he was barred from doing in the United States and ultimately severely harmed five patients, three of whom died.
In one case, Dr Patel failed to stop internal bleeding during an operation on the oesophagus of Gerry Kemps in December 2004, leaving the patient to conduct non-emergency surgery on another patient.

Martin said when Dr Patel returned five hours later to stop the internal bleeding, he did not seek specialist help and eventually completed surgery without stemming the bleeding. Kemps died the next day.

The court was also told in a 2003 case that Dr. Patel misdiagnosed Mervyn Morris, who had been suffering rectal bleeding. He then poorly performed the wrong surgery, which failed to stop the bleeding. He followed up with poor post-operative care leading to Morris’s death.
In another 2003 case, Dr Patel poorly performed an oesophagectomy on James Phillips, who was too sick for such surgery and later died, the court heard.

Martin said safer treatments had been available and the hospital had not been equipped for the complications from such surgery.

The court heard Dr Patel lied about restrictions imposed on his medical practice in the United States in order to gain employment in Australia.

Martin said Dr Patel resigned from employment in the US in June 2001, the day before he was to be sacked.

In 2002, Dr Patel made a general application to work in Australia and was offered a job at Bundaberg Base Hospital.

Martin said Dr Patel fudged details on his CV to extend the period he spent at his last place of employment in the US, and did not disclose to Australian authorities that he had been the subject of disciplinary action in the US, or that restrictions had been placed on his license. (ANI)