Following internal turmoil, Thai government shoots spending by 22 percent

Bangkok, May 28 — The Thai parliament passed the first reading of next year’s budget, which calls for a 22-percent jump in spending in the wake of political turmoil in Bangkok in recent weeks, government sources said on Friday. The bill, passed in a 250-172 vote on Thursday, was hailed as a step toward political stability after unrest surrounding a two-month anti-government protest in Bangkok left at least 88 people dead and caused about $6 billion in damage and lost income.

“The speed and manner in which the budget bill was passed shows how quickly Thailand is rebounding from the political turmoil and that institutions within the kingdom have proven to be stable and mature enough to continue conducting the country’s business,” Finance Minister Korn Chatikavanij said of the two-day budget debate. The bill calls for a 2.07-trillion-baht ($64.7-billion) budget for the next fiscal year, which begins on Oct 1.

The amount represents a 22-percent increase from the previous budget. Education would receive the largest allocation of 388 billion baht, or 18.7 percent of the budget, an 11.9-percent increase over this year as the Education Ministry implements a newly introduced policy guaranteeing 15 years of cost-free education.

Defence was allocated 170 billion baht, 8.2 percent of the total, and double the allocation of the Ministry of Agriculture. The Puea Thai opposition party criticised the defence budget as favouring the military over impoverished farmers.

Although, the defence budget was about the same as last year’s, the military has seen a large increase in spending on often questionable purchases since a 2006 coup ousted former premier Thaksin Shinawatra. Thaksin, living in self-imposed exile since 2008 to avoid a two-year jail sentence of an abuse-of-power conviction, has been accused of being the ringleader and financier of the anti-government protests in Bangkok from March 12 to May 19.

The army dispersed the protestors from their main rally site in the heart of Bangkok’s commercial district on May 19, prompting hardcore demonstrators to go on a looting and arson rampage in the city that destroyed 29 buildings. According to government figures, 88 people have died in protest-related violence over the past two months, including 77 civilians and 11 security personnel.

China tycoon Huang appeals 14 year jail term

China’s one-time richest man and the founder of a major retail chain has appealed his 14-year jail sentence for bribery and insider trading, the Legal Daily reported on Friday.

Huang Guangyu, the founder of retail chain GOME, was found guilty of bribery, insider trading and illegal business dealings this month, after being detained for over a year.

The Legal Daily said Huang believed the sentence and fines were too heavy, and further disputed the finding that one of his companies, Pengrun, had paid bribes.

Huang was fined 600 million yuan ($87.86 million) and had 200 million yuan worth of property confiscated, while his two firms, GOME and Pengrun, were fined 5 million yuan and 1.2 million yuan respectively for paying bribes.

At the end of 2009, Huang still held roughly one-third of GOME’s total outstanding shares, worth $1.9 billion, according to Thomson One Analytics.

Huang disappeared without a sign when he was first detained, raising questions about both corporate disclosure and police procedure in China. His case netted a number of senior police and other officials.

(Reporting by Huang Yan and Lucy Hornby; Editing by Sugita Katyal)

French woman flying home after Iran trial – France

French teaching assistant Clotilde Reiss is being flown back to France on Sunday after the end of her trial in Iran on spying charges, President Nicolas Sarkozy’s office said in a statement.

In Tehran on Saturday, Reiss’s lawyer said she would be allowed to leave Iran after her jail sentence was commuted to a fine of $285,000.

Drunks wrote Bible, claims Polish pop star

London, May 6 (ANI): The Bible was written by drunks and people with a fondness for “herbal cigarettes” – that’s the claim of one of Poland”s most famous and controversial pop stars.

And courtesy the remarks, Dorota Rabczewska, famed for an unabashed attitude when it comes to flaunting her flesh, has been charged by Warsaw prosecutors, reports The Telegraph.

Rabczewska made the comments in a television interview a year ago.

Popularly known as Doda, the singer, 26, ruffled conservative sentiment in Catholic Poland after explaining that she believed more in dinosaurs than the Bible because “it is hard to believe in something written by people who drank too much wine and smoked herbal cigarettes.”

Following the claims furious Catholic groups lodged complaints with the prosecutor”s office.

“It is clear that Doda thinks that the Bible was written by drunkards and junkies,” said Ryszard Nowak, chairman of the Committee for the Defence Against Sects, an organisation dedicated to protecting Christian values. “I believe that she committed a crime and offended the religious feelings of both Christians and Jews.”

If found guilty Doda faces a two-year jail sentence or a hefty fine under Polish blasphemy laws. (ANI)

Court officer’s identity theft jail term reduced

A former court officer who was found guilty of stealing a colleague’s identity has had her jail sentence reduced.

In February, 21-year-old Taylie Jade Sweeney was sentenced in the Darwin Magistrates Court to serve two months behind bars for stealing the colleague’s identity to obtain money.

Today, she won an appeal in the Northern Territory Supreme Court, arguing that part of her sentence was manifestly excessive.

The judge reduced her actual jail term to two weeks.

The court heard Sweeney is seven months pregnant and she has 14 days to surrender herself to the court.

Indian man claiming insurance fraudulently avoids jail

Melbourne, May 3 (ANI): A magistrate’s court here has delivered a suspended jail sentence to an Indian national who sought to commit insurance fraud by declaring that he had been attacked by thugs. He also claimed that they doused his car with petrol and burned it.

Jaspreet Singh, however, had actually destroyed the car himself to claim the insurance money.

The Herald Sun quoted magistrate Felicity Broughton as describing Singh”s botched insurance scam as a stupid “premeditated enterprise”” that brought great shame to himself, his family and his community.

Defence lawyer Paul McClure said it was a desperate plan for money that “backfired””.

Police prosecutor Sen-Constable Luke Devlin told Melbourne Magistrates’ Court today that Singh intended to sell his car – a 2003 Ford Futura sedan – as he intended to return to India on holiday at the end of January 2010. (ANI)

Belgium to become first EU country to ban use of burqa

Brussels, Apr.30 (ANI): Belgium is set to become the first country in Europe to ban the burqa after the country”s parliament voted on Thursday night to prohibit the wearing of the face-covering Islamic veil in public.

According to The Telegraph,no lawmaker voted against the ban on clothes or veils that do not allow the wearer to be fully identified, including full-face Muslim dress such as the niqab or burqa. There were two abstentions.

Supporters said the law would help fight terrorism and grant rights to Muslim women.

It quoted Daniel Bacquelaine, one of the liberal MPs who originally called for the ban, as insisting that the new law was “aimed at stopping people from not being identified”.

“It”s not about introducing any form of discrimination,” he said.

The ban, which is thought to affect around 100 women, would be imposed in streets, public gardens and sports grounds or buildings “meant for public use or to provide services”.

Those Muslims who ignore the ban could face fines of 22 pounds and a jail sentence of up to a week unless they have written police permission to wear the garments.

Controversy has raged elsewhere in Europe over the wearing of Muslim veils in public.

President Nicolas Sarkozy has declared the burqa not welcome in France, calling it an affront to French values that denigrates women. He is pressing ahead with a bill to ban it, despite advice that such a law could be illegal.

But Human Rights Watch has said that there is no evidence that banning the full veil would protect public safety or the rights of Muslim women.

“Bans like this lead to a lose-lose situation,” said Judith Sunderland, senior researcher at HRW.
“They violate the rights of those who choose to wear the veil and do nothing to help those who are compelled to do so,” she added. (ANI)

Man avoids jail after assaulting police officer

A Woodend man has avoided a jail sentence after pleading guilty to assaulting a police officer in the Macedon Ranges last year.

John Paul, 49, who was facing seven charges, including assaulting an officer and unlawful assault, will serve a 12-month community-based order.

He was also ordered to pay more than $5,000 in compensation.

The officer from Gisborne suffered a broken hand when attacked last November.

Jessica murder case: Family hails Supreme Court verdict

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): Sabrina Lall, the sister of murdered model Jessica Lall, on Monday expressed satisfaction and happiness over the Supreme Court upholding Delhi High Court’s verdict in convicting all accused.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma on April 29, 1999, at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant, which was owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi.

Interacting with media after the Supreme Court order, Sabrina said: “After 11 years…I am glad that the final door has been closed on this case. It has given us a lot of relief and satisfaction that the Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the high court. I am happy.”

An apex court bench consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swatanter Kumar upheld the Delhi High Court judgment on Monday.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court had convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Sharma who is serving a life sentence in Tihar jail challenged his conviction and life sentence given by the Delhi High Court.

Sabrina described the apex court”s decision as a triumph for a common family.

“When the accused were acquitted by the lower court, that was a time that I had lost hope…In these cases where high profile and powerful people are involved, the important message is that it is not an impossible fight. If society works together and we continue to fight and don”t lose hope, it is not impossible to get the conviction…There is justice in the world and it”s possible not only for me, but for all those families fighting for it,” Sabrina said.

“In this case, middle-class people came out together in peaceful support. They created a movement for justice for Jessica. There are people I don”t even recognise who came out in open support,” she added.

Sabrina also demanded that witnesses be permitted who had turned hostile.

“Punishment to hostile witness should work as a deterrent in society. They will keep lying unless somebody is held accountable for the same,” she said. (ANI)

Jessica Lall case: SC upholds Delhi High Court verdict on Manu Sharma

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the verdict given by the Delhi High Court in the model Jessica Lall murder case, convicting prime accused Manu Sharma to life imprisonment.

On February 8, a bench of the apex court consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved its verdict for April 19.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi on April 29, 1999.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Earlier, on February 21, 2006, the trial court verdict had acquitted Sharma.

Sharma had challenged the conviction in the apex court.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Sharma, had argued that the judgment was pre-determined to hold the appellant guilty as one of the judges refused to withdraw from the bench.

Narrating the sequence of events, Jethmalani alleged that from everyday hearing, it was clear that the bench was going to reverse the acquittal by the trial court.

The High Court judgment was ‘nothing but perverse” and every finding of the trial court was rejected, he said.

Appearing for the Delhi Government, Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam, justified the conviction and submitted that there was sufficient evidence to convict and sentence Sharma to a life term. (ANI)

Supreme Court verdict in Jessica Lall murder case today

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court will pronounce its verdict on Monday in Jessica Lall murder case in which prime accused Manu Sharma has challenged his life sentence awarded by the Delhi High Court.

A Bench comprising Justices P Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved their verdict on February 18.

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani had assailed the High Court verdict which had set aside the trial court judgment acquitting the accused.

He had alleged that the High Court Bench had made up its mind to hold Sharma guilty.

Jessica Lall was shot at point blank range on the night of April 29, 1999 while she was working as a barmaid at the Tamarind Court Bar owned by socialite Bina Ramani.

It was alleged that Jessica was murdered by Manu Sharma, alias Siddharth Vashist, son of Congress politician and former Union Minister Vinod Sharma, after she refused him a drink since the bar had closed for the day.

The trial court verdict acquitting Sharma on February 21, 2006, was set aside by the High Court on December 18, 2006.

The High Court had held guilty two other accused in the case Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four years” jail sentence. (ANI)

Jessica murder case: Family hails Supreme Court verdict

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): Sabrina Lall, the sister of murdered model Jessica Lall, on Monday expressed satisfaction and happiness over the Supreme Court upholding Delhi High Court’s verdict in convicting all accused.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma on April 29, 1999, at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant, which was owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi.

Interacting with media after the Supreme Court order, Sabrina said: “After 11 years…I am glad that the final door has been closed on this case. It has given us a lot of relief and satisfaction that the Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the high court. I am happy.”

An apex court bench consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swatanter Kumar upheld the Delhi High Court judgment on Monday.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court had convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Sharma who is serving a life sentence in Tihar jail challenged his conviction and life sentence given by the Delhi High Court.

Sabrina described the apex court”s decision as a triumph for a common family.

“When the accused were acquitted by the lower court, that was a time that I had lost hope…In these cases where high profile and powerful people are involved, the important message is that it is not an impossible fight. If society works together and we continue to fight and don”t lose hope, it is not impossible to get the conviction…There is justice in the world and it”s possible not only for me, but for all those families fighting for it,” Sabrina said.

“In this case, middle-class people came out together in peaceful support. They created a movement for justice for Jessica. There are people I don”t even recognise who came out in open support,” she added.

Sabrina also demanded that witnesses be permitted who had turned hostile.

“Punishment to hostile witness should work as a deterrent in society. They will keep lying unless somebody is held accountable for the same,” she said. (ANI)

Jessica Lall case: SC upholds Delhi High Court verdict on Manu Sharma

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the verdict given by the Delhi High Court in the model Jessica Lall murder case, convicting prime accused Manu Sharma to life imprisonment.

On February 8, a bench of the apex court consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved its verdict for April 19.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi on April 29, 1999.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Earlier, on February 21, 2006, the trial court verdict had acquitted Sharma.

Sharma had challenged the conviction in the apex court.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Sharma, had argued that the judgment was pre-determined to hold the appellant guilty as one of the judges refused to withdraw from the bench.

Narrating the sequence of events, Jethmalani alleged that from everyday hearing, it was clear that the bench was going to reverse the acquittal by the trial court.

The High Court judgment was ‘nothing but perverse” and every finding of the trial court was rejected, he said.

Appearing for the Delhi Government, Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam, justified the conviction and submitted that there was sufficient evidence to convict and sentence Sharma to a life term. (ANI)

Supreme Court verdict in Jessica Lall murder case today

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court will pronounce its verdict on Monday in Jessica Lall murder case in which prime accused Manu Sharma has challenged his life sentence awarded by the Delhi High Court.

A Bench comprising Justices P Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved their verdict on February 18.

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani had assailed the High Court verdict which had set aside the trial court judgment acquitting the accused.

He had alleged that the High Court Bench had made up its mind to hold Sharma guilty.

Jessica Lall was shot at point blank range on the night of April 29, 1999 while she was working as a barmaid at the Tamarind Court Bar owned by socialite Bina Ramani.

It was alleged that Jessica was murdered by Manu Sharma, alias Siddharth Vashist, son of Congress politician and former Union Minister Vinod Sharma, after she refused him a drink since the bar had closed for the day.

The trial court verdict acquitting Sharma on February 21, 2006, was set aside by the High Court on December 18, 2006.

The High Court had held guilty two other accused in the case Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four years” jail sentence. (ANI)

Sentence stands for death of Olympian’s brother

A woman convicted of causing the death of Cathy Freeman’s brother in a car crash has been refused leave to appeal against her seven year jail sentence.

In the District Court in Mackay last year, Christalea Patricia Blackaby pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death.

She had been driving with a blood alcohol reading of nearly five times the legal limit in September 2008 when her car swerved into a parked truck.

Norman Freeman – the brother of Olympic champion Cathy Freeman – was a passenger in Blackaby’s car and died from head injuries.

Blackaby sought leave to appeal against her sentence because of her troubled background, but the Court of Appeal in Brisbane today found that had been taken into account when the sentencing judge set an early parole date of 18 months.

Carly Ryan killer back in court

A Victorian man found guilty of murdering South Australian teenager Carly Ryan has applied to appeal against his conviction.

Garry Francis Newman, 51, confessed after a jury had convicted him of murder over the teenager’s death at Port Elliot, south of Adelaide.

He was given a mandatory life jail sentence and a 29-year non-parole term.

Newman’s lawyer told the Court of Criminal Appeal he was getting advice from a senior lawyer and needed another six weeks before arguing for an appeal.

The matter was adjourned until next month.

Newman’s identity was only made public on the day the court set his non-parole period.

Israeli groups decry army West Bank deportation rules

(Reuters) – The Israeli military is introducing orders that human rights activists said on Sunday could make almost any Palestinian liable for expulsion from the occupied West Bank.

World

In a statement, the army played down any notion of mass deportation, saying the orders simply amended existing Israeli regulations to assure military “judicial oversight” in the extradition of anyone “residing illegally” in the West Bank.

The orders, which go into effect on Tuesday, were posted on an army website and allow for the deportation, in some cases in less than 72 hours, of an “infiltrator” — defined as someone who does not hold an Israeli permit to reside in the West Bank.

Existing regulations had defined “infiltrator” as someone who had stayed illegally in Israel after having passed through countries it considers its enemy.

Ten Israeli rights groups condemned the orders, saying in a statement that the vast majority of Palestinians in the West Bank, territory Israel occupied in a 1967 war, have never been required to hold an Israeli-issued residency permit.

“The military will be able to prosecute and deport any Palestinian defined as an infiltrator in stark contradiction to the Geneva Convention,” the statement said.

Offenders could face a jail sentence of up to seven years.

The groups said they feared the broad wording of the orders could enable the military to expel tens of thousands of Palestinians, mainly people born in the Gaza Strip and their West Bank-born children.

Palestinians say some 25,000 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip live in the West Bank. The Gaza Strip is politically and geographically cut off from the West Bank. It is ruled by Hamas Islamists who do not recognize Israel.

Foreigners, including international activists who join Palestinians demonstrating against Israel in the West Bank, could also fall under the “infiltrator” category.

“These military orders belong in an apartheid state,” Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat said in a statement.

“Extensive in scope, they make it infinitely easier for Israel to imprison and expel Palestinians from the West Bank,” he said.

The orders provide for an appeals process in which adults served notice of deportation can take their case within eight days to a panel of military judges. But some notices can be executed in less than 72 hours.

(Writing by Jeffrey Heller and Joseph Nasr, Additional reporting by Tom Perry in Ramallah, Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)

Fresh Nuttall trial not until next year

Former Queensland Government minister Gordon Nuttall will not face trial on further corruption charges until next year.

Nuttall was charged last August with five counts of receiving corrupt payments and perjury after a Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) investigation.

The matter was mentioned briefly in the District Court in Brisbane this morning where legal representatives said they would not be ready to go to trial until the new year.

Nuttall is serving a seven-year jail sentence after being convicted last year on more than 30 counts of receiving secret commissions.

Next year’s trial is expected to take two weeks.

Brit prison monitor lands herself in jail for having ”phone sex” with inmates

London, Apr 1 (ANI): A prison monitor, who sent explicit photographs of herself and engaged in ””phone sex”” with inmates, has been given a suspended jail sentence.

Alice Belton, of Wilton Road, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, pleaded guilty at a previous hearing at Newport Crown Court on the Isle of Wight to a charge of misconduct in office.

The 23-year-old was found to have engaged in ””inappropriate”” and ””intimate”” relationships with three inmates serving at HMP Parkhurst on the Isle of Wight where she volunteered between October 2008 and April 2009.

As part of her unpaid role with the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB), she had to visit prisoners to check on their well-being, reports the Telegraph.

However, she was arrested after she was found bringing a mobile phone into the prison.

Belton told police she had first made contact with one of the prisoners, named as Stuart, through a dating site called Flirtfast, but at that time she did not know he was a serving prisoner at Parkhurst.

However, she admitted carrying on the relationship after she had found out.

The court heard Stuart attempted to persuade her to bring drugs into the prison but she refused to oblige.

The prisoner also transferred 600 pounds to her bank account as a birthday present.

It was revealed that Belton later became involved with John Paul, a friend of Stuart and also a Parkhurst inmate, and exchanged explicit text messages with him.

The court heard that Belton, who was in a relationship, also engaged in an exchange of letters with a third prisoner, called Justin, but these letters did not contain sexual material.

Defence attorney Richard Germain said that Belton was ””emotionally fragile”” and ‘‘naive’’, which had been caused by her upbringing.

Germain said there were suspicions that Belton was being groomed by the prisoners as a potential drugs courier and they had informed the prison authorities of her behaviour when she refused.

Judge John Dixon sentenced Belton to a four-month prison sentence suspended for two years and said that she had been given inappropriate support and training for her role.

He criticised the Government for failing to set up a better vetting procedure for prison monitor volunteers. (ANI)

Trials in China should be public, says Rudd

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has defied criticism from China and again called on the country to make its legal system more transparent.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has called the Australian Government’s response to the 10-year jail term for former Rio Tinto executive Stern Hu “irresponsible” and cause for “serious concerns”.

Mr Rudd says there are going to be bumps along the road in the relationship with China and has repeated his call for there to be no secrecy surrounding trials in the country.

“The responsible course of action is to ensure that your judicial process is transparent and I would say that with great respect to our friends in Beijing,” he said.

“China is an emerging power, but I think the world is watching the way China is evolving its judicial system.”

Government backbencher Michael Danby has described the charges against Mr Hu as laughable.

Mr Danby said Hu was tried in a “kangaroo court” and he should not have been sacked by Rio Tinto.

“A secret trial, confession under duress, he’s failed to give confession to these economic espionage charges,” Mr Danby said.

“And he was doing what any employee of a major company does and that is find out the market prices in the country that he’s working in.”

But Federal Deputy Opposition Leader Julie Bishop says the comments are worrying.

And she is not convinced the Prime Minister has been completely open about his knowledge of the Stern Hu case.

“Michael Danby is a senior Government spokesman. He is the chairman of a foreign affairs sub-committee and he has raised very serious allegations about the arrest, the detention and the trial of Stern Hu,” she said.

“This casts grave doubt on whether the Foreign Minister and the Prime Minister have disclosed all they know about this matter.”

Earlier this week, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith described Hu’s jail sentence as harsh and said the Government was disappointed with several aspects of the trial.

“On the bribery charge, this to me seems to be a very harsh sentence,” he said.

“And on the commercial secrets matter, because we’ve had no access to that part of the trial, there are serious unanswered questions which the international business community will want to continue to pursue with China.”