Group asks court to probe 1,000 Kenyan deaths

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — The International Criminal Court should investigate the killings and forced disappearances of more than 1,000 Kenyans as the <

span id=”lw_1319721495_5″ class=”yshortcuts cs4-visible”>government has failed to bring the perpetrators to justice, a human rights group said Thursday.

More than 300 Kenyans went missing and 1,074 were killed from 2006 to 2008, New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a new report. The group said 754 of the dead were killed by the Sabaot Land Defense Force, a militia that raped and mutilated its victims.

But almost two-thirds of those who disappeared were last seen in the custody of government forces, who launched a crackdown on the militia in March 2008, Human Rights Watch said. Nearly 4,000 people were arrested in the operation. In many villages, every male over the age of ten was rounded up, it said.

Government spokesman Alfred Mutua said the report, entitled “Hold Your Heart,” was a distraction. “We are not answering questions on it,” he said. “Maybe tomorrow.”

Among the thousands caught up in the sweep was Patrick Kipteyo Sewui, an assistant chief taken from his home by soldiers in front of his wife Phylis and their six children. She told The Associated Press that when she delivered some papers to the Chepkube military base the day after he was arrested, she saw her husband lying on the ground.

“Three soldiers were standing around him and his clothes were bloody. He had been beaten badly. When I saw him (the soldiers) chased me away. When I went home I was crying,” she said.

She never saw her husband again. She also has no government death certificate, which she needs to access her husband’s land and bank accounts. Paying school fees for the children has been a struggle.

“He was a good man. He worked hard, he cared for his family,” she said, trying not to cry as she spoke about her childhood sweetheart. “When I had our first child, he had a party … People would come to them with their problems and he would invite them inside the house to take tea.”

“I have been crying for so long,” she said sadly.

No one has been held responsible for the tortures and killings that occurred in the custody of Kenyan military forces, said Human Rights Watch, and only four people from the militia have been prosecuted for manslaughter.

Many cases collapsed when victims were too afraid to testify because the government did not offer them witness protection, said Job Bwonya, who runs Western Kenya Human Rights Watch, which is not affiliated to the international body.

The International Criminal Court should investigate, activists say, since the Kenyan government has failed to hold serious investigations, prosecute anyone for the military killings, or exhume the mass graves that residents say litter the forest around their home.

“There are human remains all over the mountain,” said Human Rights Watch researcher Ben Rawlence, showing a photo of a human jawbone and part of a skull lying in a field.

The report was released shortly after the International Criminal Court began hearings on Kenya’s postelection violence to try to pressure authorities to take action three years after the killings, Rawlence said. Complaints have also recently been filed with the U.N. and East African Court of Justice.

The militia was used in the run-up to the bloody 2007 elections to intimidate political opponents and extort money to support local candidates for the Orange Democratic Movement, the rights group said.

The court is currently holding hearings concerning six prominent Kenyans accused of orchestrating violence that killed 1,333 Kenyans following the disputed December election result. But its investigations are limited to violence that occurred after the elections. Including the violence that occurred before, in Mt. Elgon, would nearly double the death toll.

“This was distinctly political violence and it should have been included within the current ICC investigation,” Rawlence said.

African nations divided over Bashir genocide charge

KAMPALA, July 25 (Reuters) – African countries are divided about whether they should arrest Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on suspicion of genocide, diplomats at a summit told Reuters on Sunday.

Bashir was indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes in Darfur last year. This month the court added genocide to the charges, accusing him of orchestrating murders, rapes, and torture in the troubled western region.

A draft of a resolution to be passed at the African Union (AU) meeting in Ugandan capital Kampala, seen by Reuters on Saturday, contained two contentious clauses that have triggered horse-trading behind the scenes at the event.

But both paragraphs were removed after arguments that went on until 3 a.m. on Sunday, AU and Western diplomats said.

The first clause advised African countries not to arrest Bashir if he visited their nations — even if they had signed up to the ICC as 30 African countries have.

“(The AU) reiterates its decision that AU member states shall not cooperate with the ICC in the arrest and surrender of President Bashir,” the paragraph said.

The second deleted clause attacked prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo.

“BASHIR DIVIDING US”

“Those two parts caused a big fight between the delegates,” an African diplomat, who was at the meeting, told Reuters. “Bashir is dividing us.”

The latest draft resolution also “rejects for the moment” a request by the ICC to open an “Africa liaison office” in Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa, diplomats said.

Some African leaders say the court is obsessed with prosecuting Africans and ignores war criminals on other continents.

AU Commission Chairman Jean Ping has said the decision to prosecute Bashir has undermined peace efforts in Sudan.

AU summits have been marked by fights over issues such as Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s “United States of Africa” plan and the ICC.

The rows often pit northern and western states — rallied by Gaddafi — against a group of countries seen by analysts as close Western allies and usually helmed by South Africa.

“South Africa, Ghana and Botswana led the argument that the clauses should be removed,” a Western diplomat, who had seen the altered draft, told Reuters.

“Libya, Eritrea, Egypt and some other countries who have not signed up to the ICC fought strongly against that but they lost out in the end.”

Bashir went to Chad this week in defiance of his arrest warrant on his first visit to a full ICC member since he was charged. The court said Chad should arrest Bashir, but Chad said after Bashir’s arrival that it had no intention to do that.

The defiant leader returned to his capital Khartoum untouched. The final AU resolution on the ICC is expected to be agreed by heads of state on Tuesday. (Additional reporting by Jeremy Clarke)

Bashir to miss AU summit as Sudan snubs Uganda – sources

(Reuters) – Sudan President Omar Hassan al- Bashir will not attend an African Union summit in Uganda, presidential sources said on Sunday, despite a resolution urging African states not to arrest the leader wanted for genocide.

In a further snub, Khartoum will not even send a minister from Khartoum to the summit, official sources said.

The move deepens a rift between the neighbors after President Yoweri Museveni did not attend Bashir’s swearing-in after disputed elections, but visited Juba for the inauguration of South Sudan President Salva Kiir, Bashir’s deputy.

“This is not about the president being afraid of being arrested,” one presidential source told Reuters. “We could send the vice president instead but we are not sending him or any minister,” the source said.

The International Criminal Court added genocide this month to charges issued last year against Bashir of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the war-torn Darfur region where the United Nations estimates a humanitarian crisis has claimed 300,000 lives since a 2003 revolt by rebels demanding more wealth and power.

DOUBLE STANDARDS

But the AU has accused the court of double standards and of targeting the continent. A draft AU resolution seen by Reuters on Saturday in Kampala told member states not to arrest Bashir.

Bashir himself rarely fails to attend an AU summit and, intent on wooing its African allies, Sudan always sends high-level representation to the meetings.

The Sudanese permanent representative to the AU will head the delegation, the sources said.

The snub also follows a diplomatic faux pas by Uganda which retracted a statement last month that Bashir was not invited to the summit after Khartoum asked the AU to switch venue.

In defiance of the ICC warrant Bashir visited Chad last week — the first time he has traveled to a full member of the court — and returned triumphantly praising African solidarity.

The visit exposed the ICC’s key weakness — it has no police force and relies on member states to arrest suspects.

Uganda asked the ICC to investigate its northern rebellion and the court issued its first arrest warrants for commanders from the Ugandan insurgent Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).

Museveni also has a strong relationship with south Sudan, a semi-autonomous region which has fought a bloody civil war on and off with Khartoum since 1955.

The south will vote in a referendum on independence in January 2011, and most analysts expect it will secede.

Bashir to miss AU summit, Sudan snubs Uganda-sources

KHARTOUM, July 25 (Reuters) – Sudan President Omar Hassan al- Bashir will not attend an African Union summit in Uganda, presidential sources said on Sunday, despite a resolution urging African states not to arrest the leader wanted for genocide.

In a further snub, Khartoum will not even send a minister from Khartoum to the summit, official sources said.

The move deepens a rift between the neighbours after President Yoweri Museveni did not attend Bashir’s swearing-in after disputed elections, but visited Juba for the inauguration of South Sudan President Salva Kiir, Bashir’s deputy.

“This is not about the president being afraid of being arrested,” one presidential source told Reuters. “We could send the vice president instead but we are not sending him or any minister,” the source said.

The International Criminal Court added genocide this month to charges issued last year against Bashir of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the war-torn Darfur region where the United Nations estimates a humanitarian crisis has claimed 300,000 lives since a 2003 revolt by rebels demanding more wealth and power.

DOUBLE STANDARDS

But the AU has accused the court of double standards and of targeting the continent. A draft AU resolution seen by Reuters on Saturday in Kampala told member states not to arrest Bashir.

Bashir himself rarely fails to attend an AU summit and, intent on wooing its African allies, Sudan always sends high-level representation to the meetings.

The Sudanese permanent representative to the AU will head the delegation, the sources said.

The snub also follows a diplomatic faux pas by Uganda which retracted a statement last month that Bashir was not invited to the summit after Khartoum asked the AU to switch venue.

In defiance of the ICC warrant Bashir visited Chad last week — the first time he has travelled to a full member of the court — and returned triumphantly praising African solidarity.

The visit exposed the ICC’s key weakness — it has no police force and relies on member states to arrest suspects.

Uganda asked the ICC to investigate its northern rebellion and the court issued its first arrest warrants for commanders from the Ugandan insurgent Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).

Museveni also has a strong relationship with south Sudan, a semi-autonomous region which has fought a bloody civil war on and off with Khartoum since 1955.

The south will vote in a referendum on independence in January 2011, and most analysts expect it will secede.

UN’s Ban calls for full inquiry into Gaza killings

May 31 (Reuters) – U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called on Monday for a full investigation and expressed shock at Israel’s storming of a convoy of Gaza-bound aid ships and the killing of more than 10 people.

“It is vital that there is a full investigation to determine exactly how this bloodshed took place. I believe Israel must urgently provide a full explanation,” he said at a press conference in the Ugandan capital of Kampala.

The secretary-general is in Kampala to attend a review conference of the International Criminal Court (ICC). (Reporting by Aaron Gray-Block)

Wanted Bashir sworn in as Sudan president

Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, the sole sitting head of state wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court (ICC), was sworn in on Thursday after his re-election in voting marred by boycotts.

Bashir, who rejects charges of ordering mass murder, rape and torture in western Darfur, is due to preside over a January referendum on secession for south Sudan, which many analysts believe will bring the oil-producing region independence.

Wearing a flowing white robe and white headdress, Bashir welcomed heads of at least five African states attending the ceremony, including Mauritania, Chad and Djibouti.

“This phase will mark a fresh start,” Bashir told a packed parliament hall. “No return to war, and there will be no place for undermining security and stability,” he said.

But the pomp and circumstance honouring the controversial leader, especially as tensions persist between Khartoum and the semi-autonomous south and fighting continues in Darfur, put European diplomats and UN officials in a quandary.

The EU supports ICC efforts to bring Bashir to justice but is also keen to maintain dialogue to ensure the referendum does not trigger a renewal of Sudan’s decades-long civil war.

The United Nations said it would send its top two diplomats in Sudan despite criticism from human rights advocates.

“Diplomats attending al-Bashir’s inaugural would be making a mockery of their governments’ support for international justice,” said Elise Keppler, International Justice Program senior counsel at U.S.-based Human Rights Watch.

Bashir’s swearing-in follows his easy victory in an April election — he won 68 percent of the vote — that was marked by opposition boycotts and allegations of widespread fraud.

Bashir’s party and allies also won around 95 percent of parliamentary seats in the north, giving them more than the required two-thirds majority to make constitutional changes.

The former southern rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) won most of the southern seats, around 20 percent of the total parliament. South Sudan President and SPLM leader Salva Kiir, who appeared at the inauguration in his trademark giant cowboy hat, is in talks to form a government with Bashir.

RISKS AHEAD

Bashir, who took power in a 1989 coup, was last sworn in after a north-south peace deal in 2005 that ended Africa’s longest civil war, a conflict that claimed some 2 million lives and destabilised much of the region.

That inauguration was attended by senior foreign figures, including then-U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and ministers from Western nations.

On Thursday, major nations like Britain and the United States were not expected to send their heads of missions, who are both out of the country. Embassies said they would follow protocol and send diplomatic representation to the ceremony.

Yet outside powers are hoping that officials from both the north and south can work together to carry out the southern vote on independence, now set for Jan. 9, 2011.

With much of Sudan’s oil wealth lying along an uncertain north-south border, the stakes are high and there is no guarantee the road to the referendum will be smooth.

In the meantime, the ICC is trying to increase pressure. On Wednesday ICC judges told the U.N. Security Council that Sudan was protecting ICC suspects rather than arresting them, a move aimed at increasing pressure on Khartoum to cooperate.

(Additional reporting and writing by Opheera McDoom; editing by Missy Ryan, Philippa Fletcher and Mark Heinrich)

Asia moved little on human rights in 2009 – Amnesty

Asia did little to improve human rights in 2009 with nations more focused on internal problems, despite outbreaks of abuse including a tightening of civil liberties in China, Amnesty International said on Thursday.

In its 2010 annual report on the global state of human rights, Amnesty said governments were blocking progress on human rights by refusing to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) or by shielding their allies from justice.

Amnesty said the justice gap was still starkly apparent in Asia, with refugees from Afghanistan and Pakistan’s northwest frontier, the execution of 57 people by a private militia in the Philippines and the loss of civilian life in Sri Lanka towards the end of its separatist war with the Tamil Tigers last year.

“Slow moves towards institutionalising human rights and pursuing international justice have been undermined by political game-playing, and the deepening plight of migrant workers, migrants and asylum-seekers,” said Amnesty.

Abuses by serial offenders like North Korea and Myanmar, along with repression in Vietnam and Fiji, “remained unchecked by regional powers as even relatively progressive governments focused more on their internal problems”, it said.

On China, the report noted a softening of international pressure on China’s human rights abuses given its growing international economic and political clout.

A string of sensitive anniversaries last year saw China clamp down on freedom of expression, while pressure on dissidents and lawyers increased. Chinese human rights lawyers saw their licenses revoked, while leading dissidents like Liu Xiaobo, who drafted the Charter 08 manifesto calling for sweeping political reforms, were given stiff jail terms.

“I do wonder if the Chinese government is losing confidence,” said Catherine Baber, Amnesty’s Deputy Director for Asia-Pacific.

“It does not like the idea of lawyers fully utilising the means that they now have to protect victims of human rights.”

Amnesty did cited some gains in human rights in Asia.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) ratified a charter with provisions to establish a human rights body, while several Asian countries that retain the death penalty including India, Indonesia and Pakistan didn’t carry out any executions.

States block progress on global justice – Amnesty

Governments are blocking progress on human rights by refusing to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) or by shielding their allies from justice, human rights group Amnesty International said on Thursday.

Releasing its annual report, Amnesty said 2009 was a landmark year for international justice because the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sudan’s Darfur region.

Bashir, due to be inaugurated on Thursday after being re-elected president last month, is the world’s only sitting leader to be indicted by the Hague-based ICC.

“There has been progress in terms of international justice but governments are either holding themselves above the law, for example, by not signing up to the ICC or shielding their political allies when it’s holding them to account,” Amnesty’s interim secretary-general, Claudio Cordone, told Reuters.

The African Union’s refusal to cooperate with the ICC warrant — with exceptions such as South Africa and Botswana — was an example of governmental failure to put justice before politics, the rights group said.

Cordone urged states, particularly G20 nations, to prove their commitment to “global leadership” by fully signing up to the ICC. Of the G20, seven have yet to do so: the United States, China, Russia, India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

Cordone expressed confidence the United States would eventually become a member of the ICC, saying Amnesty had been encouraged by some strong statements in favour of human rights and accountability by President Barack Obama.

“If we’re serious in delivering that, one obvious signal would be that they finally join the ICC. In that sense I’m confident that will happen but it may still take a long time and persuasion on the part of many people,” he said.

Cordone said the ICC should expand its cases beyond Africa, where it is investigating crimes committed in Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Kenya as well as Sudan.

“It’s true they’ve been limited to Africa so we would expect the court to investigate other areas whether it is Colombia, or so on, to show it is truly impartial,” Cordone said.

ACCOUNTABILITY

Cordone said the United States had started 2009 “positively” with Obama ordering an end to the CIA’s secret detention programme and the so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”.

But by the end of the year, Guantanamo Bay was still open despite Obama’s promise to close the prison camp within one year, while a prison on Bagram airbase in Afghanistan still held detainees in violation of international standards.

“There has been hardly any accountability for violations during the “war on terror”,” Cordone told a news conference.

Amnesty said the U.N. Human Rights Council had shown bias against Israel, while the U.N. Security Council had shielded Israel from scrutiny after Israel’s 2008-2009 military assault in the Gaza Strip.

It said Israel and the Islamist group Hamas, which controls Gaza, were still ignoring a call for accountability by the Goldstone report into the offensive, and that international pressure was needed.

Amnesty also highlighted what it said was the U.N. Human Rights Council’s “paralysis” over Sri Lanka, which last May declared victory over the rebel Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and an end to a 25-year separatist war.

“Despite evidence of war crimes and other abuses by both the Sri Lanka government and the Tamil Tigers in the final phases of the conflict, last year the Human Rights Council adopted a resolution effectively drafted by Sri Lanka which applauded the defeat of the Tigers,” Amnesty said.

“The government only this month has announced a commission of inquiry, but this can have no credibility given the government’s long history of sham inquiries.”

CPI-M, Asian Centre for Human Rights condemn Dantewada massacre

New Delhi, May 18 (ANI): The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) and Asian Centre for Human Rights on Tuesday condemned the Maoist attack that killed over 30 people in Chhattisgarh”s Dantewada District, saying it only highlights the ”bankrupt” policies of the left extremist organization, which violate international humanitarian law and constitute war crime.

“The attack on a private passenger bus by the Maoists only highlights their bankrupt policies of attacking ordinary citizens in various parts of the country, including tribals who refuse to accept their dictates,” the Party Polit Bureau said in a statement.

The CPI-M has appealed to the people to raise their voice against the ”murderous” attack on locals and their livelihood and resist their ”depredations” against peaceful citizens.

“”Any attack by the Maoists cannot be condoned. Such attacks on civilians violates international humanitarian law and constitute war crime under Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” stated Suhas Chakma, Director of the Asian Centre for Human Rights.

“This is not the first dastardly attack on civilians by the Maoists which is a clear violation of the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions,” he added.

The Asian Centre for Human Rights urged the Maoists not to attack civilians. It also recommended that security forces should not travel on civilian buses as this increases the risk to the lives of the civilians.

Meanwhile, Chhattisgarh went on top alert in the wake of the killing by Naxalites in Dantewada and a two-day shutdown called by the ultras from Tuesday to protest the anti-Maoist operations by the security forces.

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh on Monday said the Naxal attack in Dantewada District showed their desperation.

He said the Maoists, who were losing support base, acted desperately.

“This incident shows the cruel face of the Naxals. We have been saying this… when the Naxals support base finishes they resort to such methods. Their (Naxals) belief in people”s representatives and local population has finished,” said Singh.

He said it is difficult for the State Government to deploy security personnel in every village.

“There cannot be police personnel in every village. There are 20 thousand villages,” Singh said.

He claimed that as the security forces are gaining grounds at many places, the security cover would be enhanced gradually.

The attack is the second in little over a month after 76 security personnel were killed on April 6 in Dantewada District.

The Naxals attacked a bus carrying passengers from Gadiras to Bhusaras in Dantewada district.

Naxals blew up the bus using Improvised Explosive Device (IED) at around 4.45 p.m.

The blast incident took place a day after the Maoists called for a 48-hour shutdown in the five states of Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh. (ANI)

Darfur clash kills 57 officers, rebels: police

Darfur’s strongest rebel group clashed with Sudanese government forces guarding a convoy, sparking a gunfight that killed 57 officers and insurgents, police said.

The fighting in South Darfur state late on Thursday is the latest in a surge of violence in the remote territory since the suspension of peace talks between Khartoum and the rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) last week.

Sudanese police accused JEM of attacking a commercial convoy between the town of Al Deain and the capital of south Darfur Nyala, saying officers guarding the vehicles fought off the assault.

A total of 27 members of Sudan’s Central Reserve Police and 30 JEM fighters died in the fighting, police spokesman Mohamed Abdul Majid said in a statement. He added that 87 people from both sides were wounded.

JEM told Reuters its troops came across Sudanese army forces guarding a convoy of military vehicles and ammunition trucks and said the soldiers had fired the first shots.

“A convoy of 165 vehicles of SAF (Sudan Armed Forces) were trying to attack some of our redeployed mobile units in the south of Darfur. We met them. It was a very fierce battle. Those 165 military vehicles and all the forces have been completely rounded up,” senior JEM official Al-Tahir al-Feki said.

JEM is one of two rebel forces that took up arms against Sudan’s government in 2003, accusing it of marginalising the region’s population and starving it of funding.

President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who mobilised militias to crush the uprising, is facing International Criminal Court charges of masterminding war crimes in the region.

Sudanese authorities have accused JEM of attacking and looting villages across Darfur in recent weeks.

JEM denied the accusations and said it was sending out mobile “administrative” units across Darfur and the neighbouring oil-producing region of South Kordofan to reach out to local leaders and maintain links with outposts.

“When Sudan forces attack us we have to respond,” Feki said.

He also denied reports from international sources, who asked not to be named, that JEM forces had destroyed mobile phone masts, cutting off communications along a corridor from their stronghold in West Darfur, southeast towards South Kordofan.

JEM signed a ceasefire and initial peace deal with Khartoum during talks brokered by the government of neighbouring Chad in February. Chad’s President Idriss Deby shares ethnic links with JEM’s leadership.

Further talks quickly stalled when JEM objected to Khartoum’s decision to start separate discussions with another rebel grouping, and the insurgents last week said they were suspending talks in protest against government bombing raids on their bases.

(Reporting by Andrew Heavens; editing by Michael Roddy)

FEATURE – Fear stalks Kenya’s Rift Valley ahead of votes

When fighting erupted in Kenya after the fiercely disputed 2007 presidential election, 60-year-old Edward Gitau dug a hole in his garden and buried his land title deed.

Shortly afterwards, Kalenjin supporters of the then opposition leader Raila Odinga torched Gitau’s house and hounded him out of the village. His crime: he was a Kikuyu, the tribe of re-elected President Mwai Kibaki.

As Kenyans prepare to vote in a referendum on constitutional reform in August, many remain haunted by the tribal bloodletting that convulsed east Africa’s largest economy in early 2008.

The new constitution, seen as a crucial step in healing the ethnic divisions that plague Kenyan politics, would curb the president’s sweeping powers and strengthen civil liberties ahead of the next presidential election in 2012.

Even though it is hoped a new legal framework will avert a repeat of the violence which killed 1,300 people, fear still stalks many in Gitau’s Rift Valley province.

“It is not even 2012 and we already feel the tension. If that passes well, then we will have peace,” Gitau said outside the mud-walled and tarpaulin-covered shelter he calls home.

Gitau said he believed the person who wanted him and the Kikuyu dead was a senior minister in the power-sharing government that former U.N. chief Kofi Annan brokered.

More than 300,000 people like Gitau were forced to flee their homes during the fighting. Hundreds are still to return to their homesteads, too afraid of another bout of killings.

SEVERED HEADS

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno Ocampo, is in Kenya to start his investigations into alleged crimes against humanity committed by the architects of the post-election fighting.

He has submitted a list of names to the court that analysts say may include several cabinet ministers, politicians and prominent businessmen.

Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta, an ally of Kibaki, and Higher Education Minister William Ruto, a one-time political ally of Odinga from the Rift Valley, are both fighting legal battles to try and have their names expunged from a Kenyan rights group report about the post-election violence.

The shells of gutted houses still scar the Rift Valley landscape, their walls daubed with expletives ordering Kikuyus to return to their ancestral lands or be killed.

“They tell us that next time around, they will not burn the houses but will leave our homesteads with severed heads,” one of Gitau’s neighbours said, too scared to give her name.

A local rights group says an arms race is on between the Kalenjin and Kikuyu ahead of the 2012 ballot, prompting fears of a repeat of the violence which sharply slowed growth in east Africa’s largest economy.

“Kikuyus don’t want to be taken by surprise again. Once bitten twice shy,” said a retired security agent who did not want to be named. “And the Kalenjins don’t want to use arrows this time around.”

The northern Rift Valley witnessed the most intense fighting from the start, but the violence spread to Nakuru, Naivasha and the slums of Nairobi as Kikuyus meted out reprisal attacks and other disenfranchised communities vented their anger.

LAND ISSUES KEY

Tribal rivalries have dogged Kenyan politics since the former British colony won independence in 1963, often intensifying around elections.

“We are hearing that three lorries full of weapons went to a local MP’s house and the guns were buried there,” one resident of Eldoret district told Reuters, declining to be identified for fear of reprisal.

The Kalenjin and other tribes were also building up small armouries, said Ken Wafula, executive director of the Centre For Human Rights and Democracy.

Land is one of Kenya’s most emotive issues and central to a campaign to shoot down the referendum spearheaded by Ruto. Many feel the Kikuyu were unfairly allocated land in the Rift Valley at independence.

Wafula said some 80 percent of the people living there, who would be considered outsiders, had bought their land on a willing buyer, willing seller basis.

“Now the Kalenjin settlers take advantage of situations like those (elections). Some of them had 20 acres but because they sold their land piece by piece … when there is ethnic violence and others are forced out, they reclaim the land they had sold without paying back or returning the money.”

Kenya has passed a new National Land Policy with a framework to adjudicate land cases running back to colonial times.

“We cannot really sweep it under the carpet because this problem will continue and if anything it is a justice issue,” said Catherine Gatundu, deputy coordinator at the Rift Valley-based Kenya Land Alliance.

(Editing by Richard Lough and Giles Elgood)

Kenyan tribes arming ahead of elections – group

An arms race is on between two of Kenya’s largest ethnic communities ahead of the 2012 presidential election after the last disputed vote triggered weeks of tribal bloodletting, a rights group said.

An explosive combination of a desire for revenge and lack of state security has seen Kalenjin and Kikuyu communites in Kenya’s Rift Valley stockpile firearms, said the Centre for Human Rights and Democracy.

“People are arming themselves with sophisticated firearms because there are certain communities who are saying enough is enough, the state cannot protect us … we lost lives, we lost property, we lost our humanity,” Ken Wafula, head of the group, told Reuters.

More than 1,300 people were killed in the post-election fighting in early 2008 and 300,000 were uprooted, triggering investigations into crimes against humanity.

Wafula said politicians were spearheading fundraising campaings to buy weapons such as AK-47 rifles and pistols. He said state security officials were not only turning a blind eye to the activity but actually assisting the amassing of firearms.

“State security machinery at the top level are involved. They are right in the middle of the arms race,” Wafula said in an interview in the Rift Valley town of Eldoret.

TRIBAL POLITICS

The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) chief is in Kenya this week after the Hague-based court approved an investigation into the violence which flared up when the opposition accused President Mwai Kibaki of stealing the vote.

ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has submitted a list of 20 names “who appear to bear the greatest responsibility”. The names have not been published, but the list is believed to include some prominent cabinet ministers.

Some of the worst violence occurred in the Kalejin’s Rift Valley homeland and targeted Kikuyus, triggering fierce reprisal attacks in the towns of Nakuru and Naivasha.

Tribal rivalries have plagued Kenyan politics since east Africa’s largest economy won independence from Britain in 1963, often intensifying around elections.

President Mwai Kibaki’s Kikuyu tribe and the Kalenjin of former President Daniel Arap Moi have dominated Kenya’s post-colonial politics and acquired swathes of land across the country and in the fertile Rift Valley in particular.

Tribes, such as the Luo of Prime Minister Raila Odinga, Kibaki’s arch rival in the 2007 poll before he entered a coalition government brokered by former U.N. chief Kofi Annan, say they have been politically and economically marginalised.

Wafula was charged with inciting violence last year for saying that tribes in the Rift Valley were rearming. He denies the charges.

“There’s an arms race between the Kikuyu and the Kalenjin, but other tribes, Luhyas, Luos, and Kisiis are also joining in because no one wants to be caught unawares,” Wafula said.

“Suspicion and mistrust and ethnic hatred is really entrenched.”

(Editing by Richard Lough and Giles Elgood)

Sudan opposition cries fraud at early results

Sudan’s opposition said on Friday there had been widespread fraud in the country’s first open elections in 24 years and it would never accept results showing extensive victories by the ruling party.

Many opposition parties boycotted the presidential, legislative and gubernatorial elections before voting even began, accusing President Omar Hassan al-Bashir’s party of trying to rig the votes, which aim to transform the oil producer into a democracy after decades of civil war.

But the few parties that participated in the complex elections said the preliminary reports of results from party agents observing the count were beyond belief. Results have not been officially announced.

“I was expecting there was going to be fraud but not to this extent,” said presidential candidate Abdelaziz Khaled.

“I’m amazed. This is chaos — this is not an election.”

The largest opposition party to enter the elections, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), said it was getting reports of irregularities from all over Africa’s largest country.

“Everything is totally corrupt. We are fed up and we will never recognise these elections,” the DUP’s Salah al-Basha said.

Prior to the vote, he said the party was sure to win the governorships of at least six states. On Friday he said it looked to have won none.

No one was available to comment officially from Bashir’s ruling National Congress Party, but one member told Reuters the opposition were trying to cover up their loss. “All losing parties say this,” he said, but declined to be named.

CREDIBILITY

Bashir had hoped a victory would legitimise his government in defiance of an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest for war crimes in Darfur. But the withdrawal of his two main contenders tainted the vote’s credibility.

The National Elections Commission has so far only announced the results of 27 local and national parliamentary seats won by default as there was only one contender.

Official results will begin to emerge over the coming days as counts in the more than 10,000 voting centres are collated and sent to Khartoum to be announced.

Despite decades of civil war and a heavily armed population the five-day voting period witnessed no major armed violence, a step forward for the country and a key test ahead of a referendum next year on independence for south Sudan.

Sudanese monitors in the southern capital Juba also accused South Sudan President Salva Kiir’s dominant Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) of blocking a fair poll. Kiir is expected to win the presidential election for the semi-autonomous south.

“(There is) a troubling trend in Juba of observers being obstructed from carrying out their right to observe the electoral process,” the monitors said in a statement.

International observers will issue reports on the voting this week. Sudanese opposition and civil society accused the international community of ignoring widespread irregularities.

“The technocrats of the international community … have chosen to turn a blind eye to all acts of corruption and the poor technical ability of the elections commission,” activist Hala al-Karib wrote on Friday on the Sudan Tribune website.

The opposition groups boycotting the elections say they will hold peaceful protests after the polls. However, many political analysts fear a newly elected NCP, freshly legitimised by the polls, may clamp down on political freedoms after the results.

“At some time, this right (to demonstrate) has to be granted fully to the people,” said senior NCP official Ghazi Salaheddin. “Not these days — the possibility of flare-up, clashes between demonstrators has to be borne in mind.”

Sudan mulls limited re-runs over election errors

KHARTOUM, April 14 (Reuters) – Sudanese election officials on Wednesday said they were considering re-running ballots in a very few constituencies to correct errors in voting forms, as the troubled poll entered its fourth day.

Sudan’s first competitive presidential, legislative and gubernatorial elections in 24 years have already been hit by wide accusations of fraud and procedural mistakes.

The poll, agreed under a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of north-south civil war, was supposed to help bring the oil-producing state back to democracy more than two decades after a military-led coup.

Following a series of boycotts by leading parties over accusations of fraud, the ballot now looks likely to confirm the rule of the leader of that coup, incumbent president Omar Hassan al-Bashir.

Bashir is facing charges from the International Criminal Court of masterminding war crimes in the western Darfur region and analysts say he is hoping to legitimise his rule through the poll.

Officials from Sudan’s National Elections Commission told Reuters they were considering suspending voting for seats in national and state assemblies in some states after discovering they had printed the wrong party symbols next to some candidates’ names on ballot papers.

“Logos have been swapped in a very limited number of constituencies,” said commission deputy chairman Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah.

“According to the law it (the commission) can cancel elections and hold them again within 60 days. That is one of the options we are considering.”

Other commission members and international observers told Reuters the printing errors were thought to have affected ballots in 15 to 18 state and national constituencies.

Voting has been taking place in 270 national constituencies and just under 700 state constituencies in African’s largest state.

“There are ballots that are missing symbols, duplicate symbols, even missing candidates on some forms, so that (a partial re-run) would be the logical step to take,” said one international source close to the elections.

Voting began on Sunday and was extended to last five days to allow more time for voters and officials to deal with the elections’ complexities.

Election monitors across Sudan said early voting had been affected by missing ballot boxes, poor staff training and confusion over the location of voting centres. (Reporting by Andrew Heavens; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Sudan mulls limited re-runs over election errors

KHARTOUM, April 14 (Reuters) – Sudanese election officials on Wednesday said they were considering re-running ballots in a very few constituencies to correct errors in voting forms, as the troubled poll entered its fourth day.

Sudan’s first competitive presidential, legislative and gubernatorial elections in 24 years have already been hit by wide accusations of fraud and procedural mistakes.

The poll, agreed under a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of north-south civil war, was supposed to help bring the oil-producing state back to democracy more than two decades after a military-led coup.

Following a series of boycotts by leading parties over accusations of fraud, the ballot now looks likely to confirm the rule of the leader of that coup, incumbent president Omar Hassan al-Bashir.

Bashir is facing charges from the International Criminal Court of masterminding war crimes in the western Darfur region and analysts say he is hoping to legitimise his rule through the poll.

Officials from Sudan’s National Elections Commission told Reuters they were considering suspending voting for seats in national and state assemblies in some states after discovering they had printed the wrong party symbols next to some candidates’ names on ballot papers.

“Logos have been swapped in a very limited number of constituencies,” said commission deputy chairman Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah.

“According to the law it (the commission) can cancel elections and hold them again within 60 days. That is one of the options we are considering.”

Other commission members and international observers told Reuters the printing errors were thought to have affected ballots in 15 to 18 state and national constituencies.

Voting has been taking place in 270 national constituencies and just under 700 state constituencies in African’s largest state.

“There are ballots that are missing symbols, duplicate symbols, even missing candidates on some forms, so that (a partial re-run) would be the logical step to take,” said one international source close to the elections.

Voting began on Sunday and was extended to last five days to allow more time for voters and officials to deal with the elections’ complexities.

Election monitors across Sudan said early voting had been affected by missing ballot boxes, poor staff training and confusion over the location of voting centres. (Reporting by Andrew Heavens; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Sudan starts historic vote amid confusion, delays

(Reuters) – Confusion, delays and charges of fraud marked the start of Sudan’s first multi-party elections in a quarter-century, a vote that will test the fragile unity of Africa’s biggest country.

World

The three-day election could also show whether Sudan can avoid more conflict and humanitarian crises as it heads toward a 2011 referendum on independence for the oil-producing south.

The results are widely expected to keep Sudan’s two most influential men in power: President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for allegedly planning war crimes in the western Darfur region, and Silva Kiir, who leads largely autonomous south Sudan.

Across the country, there were long queues and chaotic scenes outside polling centers. Kiir was forced to wait 20 minutes under a tree for his polling station to open in the southern capital Juba and then spoiled his first ballot by putting it in the wrong box.

Would-be voters lined up in the morning in Khartoum, where police were out in force on unusually quiet streets. Many voters were hindered by delays in getting ballots to polling stations, ballot mix-ups and names missing from the electoral roll.

But by Sunday afternoon, no major unrest was reported as people voted to choose a national president, a leader of south Sudan, national and local parliaments, and governors of all but one of the country’s 25 states.

Yet the elections’ credibility was undermined even before voting started, as leading opposition parties pulled out candidates and blamed the government for widespread vote-rigging and intimidation. Election officials, trying to plan a complex election for the first time in a generation, denied the charges.

CALL FOR EXTENSION

Opposition parties on Sunday listed more than 100 alleged violations and errors. They said elections had not begun at all in White Nile state by late afternoon because of ballot errors.

Kiir’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) asked for voting to be extended to seven days in south Sudan because many polling stations opened so late and many voters, including senior officials, could not find their names on voter rolls.

“We are complaining that the first day of elections was really very bad all over the south,” said Kiir’s campaign manager, Samson Kwaje.

Many Sudanese voted for the first time, grappling with a complex polling process that included eight ballot papers in the north, and a dozen in the south.

Men and women waited in separate lines, dipping a finger in indelible green ink before voting at cardboard booths.

“There are a lot of crowds and there should have been more information because there is a whole new generation that have never voted,” complained El-Fatih Khidr, a 55-year-old pilot who came to cast his vote in Khartoum’s Riyadh district.

REFERENDUM LOOMS

Bashir, a military man who took power in a 1989 coup, came to vote at a school near Sudan’s army headquarters, he took 10 minutes to cast his vote while security officers waited outside, shouting “God is greatest.”

In the south, where most follow Christianity or traditional beliefs, there was a palpable sense of excitement as people took part in polls they see as a prelude to the 2011 referendum that could give them independence from the mainly Muslim north.

Both votes were promised under a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of north-south civil war.

After voting, Kiir called the vote “a good beginning” for Sudan. “I hope it will be a foundation for future democracy.”

But that could go awry if Bashir blocks the 2011 plebiscite, which could prompt unilateral secession by the south and likely reignite Africa’s longest civil war.

Bashir had hoped a globally accepted vote would strengthen his hand to defy the ICC warrant, but the last-minute boycotts and widespread complaints of voting problems could derail that.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan in Khartoum; Writing by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan: Editing by Giles Elgood and Jon Hemming)

Sudan starts historic vote amid confusion, delays

KHARTOUM/JUBA, April 11 (Reuters) – Confusion, delays and charges of fraud marked the start of Sudan’s first multi-party elections in a quarter-century, a vote that will test the fragile unity of Africa’s biggest country.

The three-day election could also show whether Sudan can avoid more conflict and humanitarian crises as it heads toward a 2011 referendum on independence for the oil-producing south.

The results are widely expected to keep Sudan’s two most influential men in power: President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for allegedly planning war crimes in the western Darfur region, and Silva Kiir, who leads largely autonomous south Sudan.

Across the country, there were long queues and chaotic scenes outside polling centres. Kiir was forced to wait 20 minutes under a tree for his polling station to open in the southern capital Juba and then spoiled his first ballot by putting it in the wrong box.

Would-be voters lined up in the morning in Khartoum, where police were out in force on unusually quiet streets. Many voters were hindered by delays in getting ballots to polling stations, ballot mix-ups and names missing from the electoral roll.

But by Sunday afternoon, no major unrest was reported as people voted to choose a national president, a leader of south Sudan, national and local parliaments, and governors of all but one of the country’s 25 states.

Yet the elections’ credibility was undermined even before voting started, as leading opposition parties pulled out candidates and blamed the government for widespread vote-rigging and intimidation. Election officials, trying to plan a complex election for the first time in a generation, denied the charges.

CALL FOR EXTENSION

Opposition parties on Sunday listed more than 100 alleged violations and errors. They said elections had not begun at all in White Nile state by late afternoon because of ballot errors.

Kiir’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) asked for voting to be extended to seven days in south Sudan because many polling stations opened so late and many voters, including senior officials, could not find their names on voter rolls.

“We are complaining that the first day of elections was really very bad all over the south,” said Kiir’s campaign manager, Samson Kwaje.

Many Sudanese voted for the first time, grappling with a complex polling process that included eight ballot papers in the north, and a dozen in the south.

Men and women waited in separate lines, dipping a finger in indelible green ink before voting at cardboard booths.

“There are a lot of crowds and there should have been more information because there is a whole new generation that have never voted,” complained El-Fatih Khidr, a 55-year-old pilot who came to cast his vote in Khartoum’s Riyadh district.

REFERENDUM LOOMS

Bashir, a military man who took power in a 1989 coup, came to vote at a school near Sudan’s army headquarters, he took 10 minutes to cast his vote while security officers waited outside, shouting “God is greatest”.

In the south, where most follow Christianity or traditional beliefs, there was a palpable sense of excitement as people took part in polls they see as a prelude to the 2011 referendum that could give them independence from the mainly Muslim north.

Both votes were promised under a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of north-south civil war.

After voting, Kiir called the vote “a good beginning” for Sudan. “I hope it will be a foundation for future democracy.”

But that could go awry if Bashir blocks the 2011 plebiscite, which could prompt unilateral secession by the south and likely reignite Africa’s longest civil war.

Bashir had hoped a globally accepted vote would strengthen his hand to defy the ICC warrant, but the last-minute boycotts and widespread complaints of voting problems could derail that.

– For more stories on Sudan, click [ID:nLDE6380K1] (Additional reporting by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan in Khartoum; Writing by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan: Editing by Giles Elgood and Jon Hemming)

British campaigners threaten pope with arrest

(Reuters) – British author and atheist campaigner Richard Dawkins will try to have Pope Benedict arrested to face questions over the Catholic church’s child abuse scandal when he visits Britain later this year, one of his lawyers said Sunday.

World

Dawkins, a scientist and outspoken critic of religion, has asked human rights lawyers to examine whether charges could be brought against the pope.

The four-day trip, from September 16 to 19, will be the first papal visit since Pope John Paul II’s pastoral visit in 1982 and is the first official papal visit to Britain.

The Catholic church has rejected claims the pope helped to cover up abuse by priests and the Vatican has accused the media of waging a “despicable campaign of defamation” against him.

Dawkins and the English journalist Christopher Hitchens have commissioned lawyers Geoffrey Robertson and Mark Stephens to explore ways of taking legal action against the pope.

In an email to Reuters, Stephens said there are three possible approaches: a complaint to the International Criminal Court in the Netherlands, a private or public prosecution “for crimes against humanity” or a civil case.

They will argue that the pope does not have diplomatic immunity from prosecution as a head of state because the Vatican has “permanent observer status” at the United Nations rather than full membership and voting rights.

Dawkins, author of “The God Delusion” and “The Selfish Gene,” told the Sunday Times newspaper that he suspected child abuse by church members had been covered up.

Hitchens, who published a book in 2007 called “God Is Not Great: The Case Against Religion,” said: “This man is not above or outside the law. The institutionalized concealment of child abuse is a crime under any law.”

Critics have accused Benedict of negligence in handling abuse cases in previous roles as a cardinal in his native Germany, and in Rome.

The Vatican has denied any cover-up over the abuse of 200 deaf boys in the United States. The pope has not commented directly on the wave of sexual abuse allegations that has shaken the church around the world, including the United States, Ireland, Italy and Germany.

(Reporting by Peter Griffiths; Editing by Michael Roddy)

Sudan starts historic vote amid confusion, delays

KHARTOUM/JUBA, April 11 (Reuters) – Confusion, delays and charges of fraud marked the start of Sudan’s first multi-party elections in a quarter-century, a vote that will test the fragile unity of Africa’s biggest country.

The three-day election could also show whether Sudan can avoid more conflict and humanitarian crises as it heads toward a 2011 referendum on independence for the oil-producing south.

The results are widely expected to keep Sudan’s two most influential men in power: President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for allegedly planning war crimes in the western Darfur region, and Silva Kiir, who leads largely autonomous south Sudan.

Across the country, there were long queues and chaotic scenes outside polling centres. Kiir was forced to wait 20 minutes under a tree for his polling station to open in the southern capital Juba and then spoiled his first ballot by putting it in the wrong box.

Would-be voters lined up in the morning in Khartoum, where police were out in force on unusually quiet streets. Many voters were hindered by delays in getting ballots to polling stations, ballot mix-ups and names missing from the electoral roll.

But by Sunday afternoon, no major unrest was reported as people voted to choose a national president, a leader of south Sudan, national and local parliaments, and governors of all but one of the country’s 25 states.

Yet the elections’ credibility was undermined even before voting started, as leading opposition parties pulled out candidates and blamed the government for widespread vote-rigging and intimidation. Election officials, trying to plan a complex election for the first time in a generation, denied the charges.

CALL FOR EXTENSION

Opposition parties on Sunday listed more than 100 alleged violations and errors. They said elections had not begun at all in White Nile state by late afternoon because of ballot errors.

Kiir’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) asked for voting to be extended to seven days in south Sudan because many polling stations opened so late and many voters, including senior officials, could not find their names on voter rolls.

“We are complaining that the first day of elections was really very bad all over the south,” said Kiir’s campaign manager, Samson Kwaje.

Many Sudanese voted for the first time, grappling with a complex polling process that included eight ballot papers in the north, and a dozen in the south.

Men and women waited in separate lines, dipping a finger in indelible green ink before voting at cardboard booths.

“There are a lot of crowds and there should have been more information because there is a whole new generation that have never voted,” complained El-Fatih Khidr, a 55-year-old pilot who came to cast his vote in Khartoum’s Riyadh district.

REFERENDUM LOOMS

Bashir, a military man who took power in a 1989 coup, came to vote at a school near Sudan’s army headquarters, he took 10 minutes to cast his vote while security officers waited outside, shouting “God is greatest”.

In the south, where most follow Christianity or traditional beliefs, there was a palpable sense of excitement as people took part in polls they see as a prelude to the 2011 referendum that could give them independence from the mainly Muslim north.

Both votes were promised under a 2005 peace deal that ended more than two decades of north-south civil war.

After voting, Kiir called the vote “a good beginning” for Sudan. “I hope it will be a foundation for future democracy.”

But that could go awry if Bashir blocks the 2011 plebiscite, which could prompt unilateral secession by the south and likely reignite Africa’s longest civil war.

Bashir had hoped a globally accepted vote would strengthen his hand to defy the ICC warrant, but the last-minute boycotts and widespread complaints of voting problems could derail that.

– For more stories on Sudan, click [ID:nLDE6380K1] (Additional reporting by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan in Khartoum; Writing by Andrew Heavens and Missy Ryan: Editing by Giles Elgood and Jon Hemming)

British campaigners threaten pope with arrest

(Reuters) – British author and atheist campaigner Richard Dawkins will try to have Pope Benedict arrested to face questions over the Catholic church’s child abuse scandal when he visits Britain later this year, one of his lawyers said Sunday.

World

Dawkins, a scientist and outspoken critic of religion, has asked human rights lawyers to examine whether charges could be brought against the pope.

The four-day trip, from September 16 to 19, will be the first papal visit since Pope John Paul II’s pastoral visit in 1982 and is the first official papal visit to Britain.

The Catholic church has rejected claims the pope helped to cover up abuse by priests and the Vatican has accused the media of waging a “despicable campaign of defamation” against him.

Dawkins and the English journalist Christopher Hitchens have commissioned lawyers Geoffrey Robertson and Mark Stephens to explore ways of taking legal action against the pope.

In an email to Reuters, Stephens said there are three possible approaches: a complaint to the International Criminal Court in the Netherlands, a private or public prosecution “for crimes against humanity” or a civil case.

They will argue that the pope does not have diplomatic immunity from prosecution as a head of state because the Vatican has “permanent observer status” at the United Nations rather than full membership and voting rights.

Dawkins, author of “The God Delusion” and “The Selfish Gene,” told the Sunday Times newspaper that he suspected child abuse by church members had been covered up.

Hitchens, who published a book in 2007 called “God Is Not Great: The Case Against Religion,” said: “This man is not above or outside the law. The institutionalized concealment of child abuse is a crime under any law.”

Critics have accused Benedict of negligence in handling abuse cases in previous roles as a cardinal in his native Germany, and in Rome.

The Vatican has denied any cover-up over the abuse of 200 deaf boys in the United States. The pope has not commented directly on the wave of sexual abuse allegations that has shaken the church around the world, including the United States, Ireland, Italy and Germany.

(Reporting by Peter Griffiths; Editing by Michael Roddy)