Togo to have ban lifted after Blatter mediation

Togo will have their African Nations Cup ban lifted after FIFA boss Sepp Blatter brokered an agreement with the Confederation of African Football (CAF) in Zurich on Friday.

Togo withdrew from this year’s tournament in Angola after two members of their delegation and the team bus driver died in an ambush in the province of Cabinda.

While the world expressed horror and sympathy, African football’s governing body slapped them with a four-year ban, saying they had not properly withdrawn from the tournament and that the players had been forced home because of the pressure of their government.

“This decision is good news for us — it gives us a real bounce,” Elitsa Lanou, technical director of the Togo team, said in a statement.

“If the sanction had been upheld, we would have been knocked flat. Now we have to organise and move on.”

Blatter was asked to broker a solution after Togo appealed to the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport against the ruling keeping them out of the 2012 and 2014 events.

“This shows we can solve our internal disputes within the football family for the benefit of all those who are involved in our game and in particular for the players,” Blatter said in a FIFA statement.

Although the agreement says CAF’s president Issa Hayatou must still ask his executive committee to squash the sanction, that should be a mere formality given his position of authority.

Togo have agreed in return to admit they did not follow proper procedure in withdrawing from the Nations Cup.

Togo’s star player Emmanuel Adebayor announced his retirement from international football in the wake of CAF ban but might now be persuaded to return.

CAF left Togo out of February’s draw for the 2012 Nations Cup qualifiers but have an open berth in one of the groups that they are expected to place the Togolese in.

CAF’s executive committee meets in Cairo next week when the Togo ban should be formally rescinded.

(Additional reporting by John Zodzi in Lome)

ASEAN summit aims for ‘community’ amid Thai unrest

Southeast Asian leaders will talk about building a strong economic and political community on Thursday at an annual summit clouded by unrest in Thailand and Myanmar’s widely derided election plans.

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva cancelled his trip to Hanoi for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ summit after declaring a state of emergency on Wednesday to control a month-long anti-government protest aimed at forcing an election.

“The situation in Bangkok is worrying,” Singapore Foreign Minister George Yeo said. “It is a sombre backdrop to our discussions.

“ASEAN is not a collective grouping only for good times. The character of ASEAN is informed by how we react to crises, whether it is to natural disasters or man-made crises.”

The 10-member ASEAN has been largely focused on economic and diplomatic issues since it was founded in 1967 at the height of the Vietnam War.

But in 2008, it adopted a charter that turned the region of 580 million people with a combined GDP of $2.7 trillion into a rules-based bloc that aims to become a political, economic and security community over the next five years.

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM

Foreign ministers on Thursday signed a protocol establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism that aims to resolve arguments between ASEAN member states, such as over territory.

The terms of reference and procedures are still being worked out, however, and will only be finalised at an ASEAN ministerial meeting in July.

“The Charter doesn’t limit or stipulate the kind of disputes that would brought before the dispute resolution mechanism,” Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa told reporters after the signing ceremony. “Certainly from our perspective it would be better not to be too limiting.”

But he said it would not be used in any country’s internal disputes or human rights issues — in Myanmar, for instance.

“Normally, the dispute settlement mechanism would be interstate, not intrastate, between ASEAN member states. It would be a huge stretch to apply it to a situation within a country,” he said when asked if it could be used to pressure Myanmar.

The Myanmar envoy was asked about widely dismissed election plans at a working dinner of ASEAN foreign ministers on Wednesday, said several participants, including Yeo.

“Their internal processes are still going on, intense discussions, I hope, between the government and the political parties and I hope within the political parties themselves, but the coming months will be critical months for Myanmar,” he said.

Indonesia and the Philippines have publicly criticised Myanmar’s election laws, which ban political prisoners, such as opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, from running.

Her National League for Democracy, which won the last election in 1990 by a landslide but was kept from governing, is boycotting this one. That move could make it difficult for the junta to portray the polls as free, fair, inclusive and credible.

Myanmar has so far kept the polling date a secret.

GENTLE APPROACH

ASEAN has never censured Myanmar over its rights record and is unlikely to do so this time. But summit leaders are likely to tell the junta’s representative, Prime Minister Thein Sein, that Myanmar is hurting the group’s image and credibility.

“The Myanmar issue still presents a problem when we want to take ASEAN forward to negotiate and deal with other groupings and countries,” Thai Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya said. “It presents a major limitation for us.”

ASEAN has always taken a gentle approach to its most truculent member.

“We are not in a position to punish Myanmar,” Yeo said.

“The reality of the strategic situation is Myanmar’s two biggest neighbours, China and India, will continue to engage the country. For this reason, the U.S. embargo has not worked.

“ASEAN takes a very realpolitik position, which is that if China and India remain engaged in Myanmar, we have to. It is better that Myanmar remain in the ASEAN sphere than being a buffer state in between the two biggest countries on earth.”

(Additional reporting by Ambika Ahuja and Simon Rabinovitch; Editing by Alex Richardson)

Patients should not be left to suffer due to infighting at hospitals: HC

New Delhi, March 31 (ANI): Taking the authorities at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences to task over neglecting patients due to ego clashes among doctors, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday stated that internal disputes at the hospital would not to be tolerated at the cost of suffering patients.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice A P Shah expressed concern over patients not being treated properly due to ego clashes among different groups of doctors in the premier institute.

The court’s observation came while taking cognisance of a letter written by a mother of month-old child, alleging callousness on behalf of AIIMS doctor in treating her child.

In the letter, the mother Rekha told the court that her baby was suffering from heart ailment and was admitted to the AIIMS under the supervision of Doctor A K Bisoi, a Cardio Thoracic Surgeon. However, the baby was neglected by hospital authorities after Bisoi was suspended by the Health Minister on March 9.

Taking serious consideration of such a situation at the premier hospital, the court said, “We are interested in saving the child. Tell us how you are going to do it. We are not concerned about internal disputes in the hospital. Patients are suffering because of internal fighting.”

“No body should be victimised because of ego clash,” the court said while directing the hospital to bring one specialist doctor before it in the afternoon to assure that the child would be properly treated. (ANI)

Patients should not be victimised because of ego clashes among doctors: HC

New Delhi, Mar 31 (ANI): Taking notice of a letter written by the mother of a month-old child, alleging carelessness by a doctor of All India Institute Of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), the Delhi High Court on Tuesday said internal disputes at the hospital would not to be tolerated at the cost of those suffering.

Expressing concern over the doctors not performing their duties properly, the bench headed by Chief Justice A P Shah said, “No body should be victimised because of ego clash.”

Rekha, in her letter, had told the court that her baby was suffering from a heart disorder and was admitted in AIIMS under the supervision of Doctor A K Bisoi, a Cardio Thoracic Surgeon.

She blamed the hospital authorities for neglecting her child after the Union Health Ministry suspended Bisoi on March 9.

The High Court has asked the hospital to arrange for one specialist doctor before this afternoon to give a suitable treatment to the child at the earliest.

Agitated over the callousness on behalf of AIIMS, considered to be country’s premier medical institute, the bench said, “We are interested in saving the child. Tell us how you are going to do it. We are not concerned about internal disputes in the hospital.”

After the suspension of Bisoi, the treatment of at least 11 children was left pending.

AIIMS director Dr. R C Deka had instructed the cardio-thoracic and vascular sciences centre (CTVS) to ensure that the five other surgeons of the centre attended to Bisoi’s patients.

However, according to sources, the CTVS chief Dr Sampath Kumar did not authorise other consultants in the department to take over Bisoi’s cases in time. (ANI)

Criticism of Jordanian theologian indicative of Jihadist decline: CSM

Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), Mar.27 (ANI): One of the world’s most influential jihadi theologians has reportedly been criticised by some of his former followers for allegedly moderating his views, a claim he denies.

According to a Christian Science Monitor report, the criticism of Jordanian cleric Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi, who was spiritual adviser of the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, is significant because of Maqdisi’s stature as a revered spiritual mentor who legitimises violence with his religious interpretations of Islamic sacred texts.

For some outside experts, the bitter verbal dispute in jihadi online forums is alarming because it heralds the emergence of an even more radicalised younger generation of violent extremists.

Murad Batal al-Shishani, a London-based analyst of Islamic groups calls this radicalised generation “neo-Zarqawists.”

Other analysts regard the back-and-forth between Maqdisi and his critics as an indication of disarray in a jihadi movement that is past its prime.

The attacks on his credibility come on top of other disputes that have already caused “fragmentation” within the jihadi community, claimed Thomas Hegghammer, a fellow in Harvard Kennedy School’s international security program and moderator of jihadica.com, a blog that monitors jihadi Internet activity.

“I think we’re seeing some kind of decline. We’re past the peak…. We’re at just the beginning of the decline,” he added.

The two assessments reflect a complex trend that analysts have been seeing for some time:

Even as Al Qaeda has become a spent organizational force, and the wider Salafi-jihadi community has been weakened by a loss of public support and by internal disputes – in large part because of the violent excesses of Zarqawi in Iraq that killed so many Muslims – a new danger has emerged in smaller, independent, and more radical groups that are inspired by jihadi ideology and devoted to violence.

Steven Brooke, a Washington-based analyst, notes that while an organized jihadist movement “remains a remote possibility” for now, “a non-violent but especially stern … brand of Salafist Islam has elbowed its way into Egypt’s religious landscape.”

According to jihadica.com, some of the most virulent attacks on Maqdisi have appeared on the jihadi web forum Madad Al Suyuf, where he was criticized for “ambivalence” on the issue of declaring other Muslims apostates. (ANI)

Palestinians agree to prohibit internal violence

Palestinians agree to prohibit internal violence Gaza City – Palestinian reconciliation negotiators in Cairo signed an agreement to prohibit fighting or the use of weapons to settle internal disputes, a Palestinian academic said Saturday.

The agreement was ratified as rival Palestinian factions continued intense talks to reach an agreement on broader issues such as the formation of a unity government to replace the Hamas-led government in the Gaza Strip and the Western-backed government in the West Bank formed by President Mahmoud Abbas of the Fatah movement.

Yasser al-Wadia, the independent academic member of the reconciliation committee, said his committee had made great progress.

The work of the other committees – especially those dealing with the formation of a government and reforms in the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) – were facing several obstacles, other officials said. (dpa)