Lawsuit against Apple, AT&T can remain as class action:AP

(Reuters) – A monopoly abuse lawsuit against Apple Inc (AAPL.O) and AT&T Inc’s (T.N) mobile-phone unit can continue as a class action against the two companies, the Associated Press reported, citing a federal judge.

AT&T, the biggest U.S. phone company by revenue and the exclusive U.S. provider for iPhone, has come under withering criticism from iPhone users over its network quality since the smartphone went on sale in 2007.

The agency said an amended complaint filed in June 2008 deals with Apple’s practice of “locking” iPhones with AT&T’s network and its control over the applications that can be installed on its smartphone. The lawsuit also consolidates those filed by iPhone buyers starting in late 2007.

Parts of the lawsuit that deal with violations to antitrust law can continue as a class action, Judge James Ware of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said in court documents filed on July 8, AP said.

Reuters was not able to contact Apple and AT&T out of regular U.S. office hours.

The lawsuit — which includes any iPhone buyer with a two-year AT&T agreement since June 2007 — also says Apple secretly made AT&T its exclusive iPhone partner in the U.S. for five years, dampening competition and driving up prices.

Early in June, AT&T announced plans to stop offering its unlimited pricing plan for new subscribers to its mobile data services, in an effort to improve the speed of its network by cutting down on network-clogging downloads. [ID:nN02173229]

According to the lawsuit, consumers found themselves locked into a five-year relationship with AT&T, AP said.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction to keep Apple from selling locked iPhones in the U.S. and from determining what iPhone programs people can install. It also seeks damages to cover legal fees and other costs, the report said. (Reporting by Antonita Madonna Devotta in Bangalore; Editing by Anshuman Daga)

Supreme Court quashes bail granted to Pappu Yadav

New Delhi, May 3 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday quashed the bail granted to former MP and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav in connection with the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) MLA Ajit Sarkar murder case

A bench of Justices Markandey Katju and A K Patnaik pronounced the verdict and said the High Court”s decision amounted to contempt of the apex court, which had clearly restrained any court in the country from granting bail to Yadav.

“It is a matter of regret that despite clear order passed by this court in 2007 that no bail should be granted by any court, the High Court has gone ahead and granted bail,” the bench observed while allowing an appeal filed by the CBI seeking cancellation of the bail.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had on March 26 approached the apex court challenging the order of the Patna High Court that had granted bail to Yadav.

The Patna High Court had earlier on February 18, 2009 granted bail to the 43-year-old RJD leader undergoing life imprisonment in the murder case.

The Supreme Court said that it is general rule that when the apex court rejects the bail, the High Courts or the subordinate courts cannot in any manner grant bail to the accused or the convicts.

Similarly, when the High Court rejects a bail, the Sessions courts or the magistrates do not have any power to grant bail, it said.

But in the present case, the bench regretted that the High Court granted bail to Yadav despite an injunction by the apex court.

Additional Solicitor General Haren Raval complained that the High Court granted bail to the RJD leader without passing any reasoned order after initially rejecting his two bail applications.

A special CBI court in Patna had earlier on February 14, 2008, awarded life imprisonment to Pappu Yadav.

The court also awarded life imprisonment to Rajan Tiwari and Anil Yadav in connection with the case.

Sarkar, who had a feud with Yadav over issues related to farm labourers, was shot dead in Bihar”s Purnea District on June 14, 1998. (ANI)

Mindy McCready says she first had sex with Roger Clemens at age 21

New York, Apr 30 (ANI): In a soon-to-be-released sex tape, Mindy McCready has revealed that baseball ace Roger Clemens struggled with erectile dysfunction “a lot of the time” and the two first had sex when she was 21.

McCready”s attorney Adam Dread had told the Daily News last month that he was seeking to get an injunction to prevent the tape”s release, but said Thursday night he and his client were “moving on.”

Vivid Entertainment will release the tape Monday, although portions are already on the Internet.

In the snippets, a male interviewer asks McCready about the former Yankee’s bedroom performance and when the two first had sex.

It was in 2008 that it was first reported that McCready met Clemens when she was 15— a point that McCready re-confirmed last August during an interview.

Clemens was a married Red Sox ace when they met in 1991 and McCready spent the night with Clemens at his hotel.

In the tape, she has said that she watched a “Walter Matthau” movie with Clemens that night and that the two took a shower together.

Asked if Clemens was good in bed, McCready said at one point in the tape, “When he could get it up.”

It was reported last month that during McCready”s interview with the FBI in conjunction with Clemens” perjury investigation, the feds asked McCready about whether Clemens experienced erectile dysfunction—a common side effect for steroid users.

Clemens has denied ever using performance-enhancing drugs. (ANI)

UPDATE 1-Barrick gets court go-ahead on Cortez Hills

TORONTO, April 14 (Reuters) – Barrick Gold (ABX.TO) said on Wednesday that a U.S. district court has ruled it can continue mining operations at its Cortez Hills gold mine in Nevada while additional environmental assessments on the project proceed.

In December, Barrick’s shares tumbled after a U.S. appeals court ruled that the project — which has faced opposition from local native Indian leaders and environmental groups — requires additional environmental analysis by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. [ID:nN04153811]

The appeals court directed the District Court of Nevada to issue an injunction that could either halt all work at Cortez Hills, or affect only specific operations at the site.

In January, Barrick asked the District Court to issue only a limited injunction that would allow work at its Cortez Hills mine in Nevada to continue while the U.S. Bureau of Land Management completes an additional study of three aspects of the project. [ID:nN26105041]

“The court has affirmed that the supplemental studies can be completed by the Bureau of Land Management without halting our operations,” said Greg Land, president of Barrick’s North American operations, in a statement.

Shares of Barrick were up 1.1 percent at C$40.85 on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Wednesday morning.

($1=$1.00 Canadian) (Reporting by Euan Rocha; editing by Peter Galloway)

Traditional owners lose drilling injunction

An exploration company has been cleared of any unauthorised drilling at Bryah Basin in the Upper Gascoyne.

The Jidi Jidi Aboriginal Corporation had accused Alchemy Resources of breaching the conditions of its Indigenous Land Use Agreements at a gold and copper site, north of Meekatharra.

The corporation says the company did not carry out heritage surveys before drilling.

A spokesman for the Department of Mines and Petroleum says Alchemy did not breach its tenement conditions or carry out any unauthorised works.

The spokesman says the Federal Court determined that native title in the area had been extinguished.

Alchemy says it has not received any demand from the traditional owners to stop drilling in the Bryah Basin.

Lawyers confident over Muckaty legal challenge

Lawyers planning to challenge a waste dump at Muckaty Station near Tennant Creek say if what they have been told is correct, they should be able to have the decision overturned.

George Newhouse was one of three lawyers from around Australia who met traditional owners in Tennant Creek over the weekend.

Some traditional owners say they have a claim to the land the Federal Government is considering, but were not consulted about the site’s nomination.

Mr Newhouse says a lot of people came to protest against the nuclear facility.

“I would have to imagine that was the largest demonstration in the history of Tennant Creek,” Mr Newhouse said.

Mr Newhouse says it may take a week or two for the lawyers to consider what they have been told, but he says legal proceedings could move quite quickly.

He says the lawyers are most likely to try a challenge in the Federal Court and would be seeking an injunction.

“It may be that the process of nominating was so flawed that we can attack it on other bases, denial of natural justice, unfairness those sorts of things,” he said.

“It is too early to say what our claims may be, but I certainly wouldn’t suggest that there are no rights to take this matter forward.”

Microsoft sues UK game controller maker

(Reuters) – Microsoft Corp on Thursday filed a lawsuit claiming British video game accessory maker Datel Design and Development Ltd is illegally copying the software company’s game console controllers.

Technology

Microsoft, which makes the Xbox game system, claims Datel’s “TurboFire” and “WildFire” wireless controllers — which resemble Xbox controllers and sell for up to $50 on the Internet — infringe a number of Microsoft patents.

In the lawsuit, filed in federal court in Seattle, Microsoft asks for an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, payment of royalties or profits Datel made from the sales, while also asking for an injunction on manufacturing the disputed controllers.

A call to Datel’s U.S. unit, which is also named as a defendant in the suit, was not immediately returned.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby)

Microsoft sues UK game controller maker

(Reuters) – Microsoft Corp on Thursday filed a lawsuit claiming British video game accessory maker Datel Design and Development Ltd is illegally copying the software company’s game console controllers.

Technology

Microsoft, which makes the Xbox game system, claims Datel’s “TurboFire” and “WildFire” wireless controllers — which resemble Xbox controllers and sell for up to $50 on the Internet — infringe a number of Microsoft patents.

In the lawsuit, filed in federal court in Seattle, Microsoft asks for an unspecified amount of compensatory damages, payment of royalties or profits Datel made from the sales, while also asking for an injunction on manufacturing the disputed controllers.

A call to Datel’s U.S. unit, which is also named as a defendant in the suit, was not immediately returned.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby)

Ex-cop’s case against Nine goes belly up

A former Sydney police officer has lost her legal battle to preview the latest series of Underbelly so she could see if she had been legally defamed.

Wendy Gaye Hatfield is mentioned in a tie-in book for the Network Nine series, which she said painted her in a bad light.

The court heard the book suggests Ms Hatfield had a sexual relationship with Kings Cross nightclub owner John Ibrahim and had been promoted through the ranks of the force by giving sexual favours.

Ms Hatfield argued she should be allowed to watch Underbelly: The Golden Mile before it goes to air because the episodes featuring her character could be defamatory.

If that was the case, Ms Hatfield would seek an injunction preventing the show’s broadcast.

Today Justice Harrison dismissed the case.

He ruled Ms Hatfield would have all she needed to decide whether to launch a defamation action after the program went to air.

Underbelly: The Golden Mile focuses on organised crime and underworld figures that operated in Sydney’s Kings Cross area in the mid-1990s.

HINDRAF leader sues Malaysian Govt for 100-million-ringgit over terrorist tab

Kuala Lumpur, Sep. 11 (ANI): Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) leader M. Manoharan has sued the Malaysian Government for a whopping 100-million-ringgit for calling him a terrorist.

Manoharan, who was accompanied by Hindraf legal adviser P. Uthayakumar, filed the suit against the state and five other defendants at the High Court Registry on Friday, The Star Online reports.

The other respondents named in the suit are Inspector-General of Police Musa Hassan, Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail, Star Publications (M), New Straits Times Press (M) and Utusan Melayu (M).

Manoharan is also seeking an injunction to stop the defendants or their agents from repeating any of the libellous statements about him.

In his statement, Manoharan said the defendants had published words, which implied that he was a violent terrorist, a devil in disguise, and intended to use violence to achieve his objective.

The Kota Alam Shah assemblyman stated that the claims that he intended to kill other Malaysians had caused him great embarrassment, and ruined his reputation. (ANI)

Stella McCartney wins first court round in ‘Nude’ perfume dispute

London, August 21 (ANI): Stella McCartney has been granted the legal permission to launch her perfume after she was taken to court by U2 star Bono’s wife Ali Hewson over trademark infringement.

Hewson claimed that Sir Paul McCartney’s daughter’s use of the word “nude” for her own variety of perfume called ‘Stella Nude’ amounted to copyright infringement, as she owns a company named Nude Brands Ltd.

But a judge turned down Hewson’s bid to block the perfume from making its debut in British stores, reports the Daily Express.

Judge Christopher Floyd said an injunction could cause “massive disruption” to McCartney’s business.

The case is set to go to court in London this autumn. (ANI)

F1 teams to meet Mosley again on Friday

Formula One teams will meet FIA president Max Mosley on Friday with champions Ferrari and other manufacturers threatening to walk away from the sport at the end of the season.

The meeting, which team sources said would be on Renault team boss Flavio Briatore’s luxury yacht at the Monaco Grand Prix, will be the second in eight days between the teams and head of the governing International Automobile Federation to try to resolve the crisis.

Friday is a rest day for the Formula One teams ahead of Sunday’s race.

The teams, some of whom attempted to stage a walkout at the last meeting in London, face a May 29 deadline to sign up for the 2010 championship but Formula One’s commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone doubted many would do so.

“We’ll have to wait and see. I think the majority probably won’t put an entry in,” he told Reuters.

Toyota, champions Ferrari, Renault and the two Red Bull teams all say they cannot sign up for 2010 unless the regulations, which include an optional 40 million pound ($63.18 million) budget cap, are rewritten.

“There is a high probability that we won’t enter before the deadline,” Toyota motorsport president John Howett told Reuters.

“If nothing changes I don’t think that professionally it is possible to commit the company to do that. I can’t recommend that in my position.”

FERRARI OPPOSITION

Although Mosley and Ecclestone have said they expect all teams to compete under the same regulations, the cap would give those teams accepting it greater technical freedom than others remaining on unrestricted budgets.

Ferrari say the budget cap and the sort of new entrants attracted by it would reduce Formula One, the pinnacle of motorsport, to the level of a junior series.

“If Formula One becomes Formula Three, we won’t race,” Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo said on Thursday.

The Italian glamour team failed to secure an injunction in a French court on Wednesday to stop the FIA introducing the changes.

Ecclestone said the situation worried him.

“We don’t want to lose Ferrari,” he said. “I hope it’s unlikely. I am concerned, I don’t want them leaving. I don’t think anybody does.”

Some of the team bosses, appearing at a news conference after practice, agreed.

“I think that all teams want to make sure that everybody remains in Formula One. I don’t think anybody wants to see a team depart from Formula One, Ferrari included,” said Force India’s Vijay Mallya.

BMW-Sauber’s Mario Theissen added: “I think we need to work out a solution. Formula One is a very strong brand, a very strong platform. The stakeholders are benefitting from it, so there is really no point in destroying that platform.”

(To query or comment on this story email sportsfeedback@thomsonreuters.com)

Vodacom: govt defies Cosatu

Government lawyer SA Celliers said on Sunday that the Zuma administration stood by what had been agreed with Vodafone, and said Cosatu’s attempt to scupper the deal was going nowhere.

“The prima facie case is not there to stop the listing,” Celliers told the court. “There isn’t a case to start with.”

A South African court will decide on Sunday whether this week’s listing of mobile phone company Vodacom can proceed after last-minute objections from the industry regulator and a powerful trade union group.

Pretoria’s North Gauteng High Court said it would make a ruling by 19:00 on the Cosatu union body’s request for an injunction blocking Monday’s listing – which would be one of the Johannesburg bourse’s biggest.

Halting the deal on its eve would deal a huge blow to South Africa’s credentials as an investor-friendly emerging market and intensify fears of resurgent union clout under new president Jacob Zuma.

It could also hit the rand, since British mobile phone giant Vodafone has already brought R20.5bn into South Africa to buy a 15% stake in Vodacom, and would be forced to repatriate the cash if the deal hit the buffers, Vodacom’s lawyer told the court.

The listing of Vodacom, which some analysts have valued at more than R70bn, is the final part of a plan by fixed-line operator Telkom to get rid of its 50% stake in the country’s biggest mobile operator.

Under the plan, Vodafone agreed to buy the 15% stake from Telkom, giving it a controlling 65% holding. Telkom will then distribute its remaining 35% to shareholders.

Cosatu, which regards Zuma as a political ally, has long opposed the deal on the grounds that it threatens jobs and cedes control of a major South African company to a foreign firm.

U-turn

The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa), the industry watchdog, said in April the deal did not need its approval but suddenly changed its mind on Friday, less than a week after Zuma was inaugurated.

The rand fell as much as 3% amid fears it was an early sign of the unions and the left wing of Zuma’s ruling ANC managing to sway policy in Africa’s biggest economy.

The opposition Democratic Alliance attacked Icasa’s volte face as a “direct assault on any attempt to encourage foreign investment in South Africa”.

“To behave in such a ham-fisted fashion sends precisely the wrong signal to foreign investors,” the party, which came a distant second to the ANC in last month’s election, said.

On Friday, Icasa demanded a public “consultation” on Telkom’s sale of its stake to Vodafone, but gave few details other than to say hearings should take place by mid-June.

Nobody from Icasa was available for comment on Saturday or Sunday.

Vodacom vowed to fight the injunction bid and Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) bosses said they were ready to proceed on Monday if given the green light.

“The listing is on track, and we’re awaiting a decision or advice from Vodacom as to how they want to proceed,” JSE deputy Chief Executive Nicky Newton-King said.

Cosatu denied any link between the timing of Icasa’s U-turn on Friday and Zuma’s accession to the presidency on May 9.

“That’s purely coincidental,” spokesman Patrick Craven said. “The key question is ‘What legal power does Icasa have?’”

Court judgement could threaten future of UK village green cricket

London, May 14 (ANI): A county court is to rule whether a homeowner can stop his local village cricket team playing because of the threat of players knocking a six on to his roof or into his garden.

In a long running dispute that has more the hallmarks of a bitter divorce than a neighbourly dispute, a judge will be asked to hand down a legal ruling that will have implications for amateur cricketers up and down the country, reports The Telegraph.

It centers on Shamley Green, near Guilford in Surrey, where cricket has been played on its village green for 169 years, despite roads running through the playing area and the backs of houses dotting the boundary.

But four years ago, when Mike Burgess moved into a bungalow on the edge of the boundary and just 25 yards from the crease, all that changed.

Aware that a crisp, square leg pull could run under his gate or through his hedge; or a slog could arrow straight onto his roof, he issued a set of demands that would protect his bungalow.

After a flurry of arguments, legal letters and even a session of independent mediation, Burgess is now asking the court to issue an injunction against the club, preventing it from playing on the green until his demands are met.

They include calling for the club to put up 25ft high nets around his property to protect it from any stray balls, and for players to be declared out if they hit it so hard it clears the nets and hits his property. He also wants a health and safety risk assessment to protect other homeowners and the general public while a match is on.

David Harris, chairman of the cricket club, said it had done all it could to meet Burgess half way and said its future was in doubt if the court ruled against them.

The club has a policy of paying for replacement windows and roof tiles caused by their cricketers.

Burgess, 54, a clinical audit specialist, said: “This has nothing to do with stopping cricket, I like cricket, but the injunction is designed to instigate what needs to be done to create a safe environment.” (ANI)

Amy Winehouse wins ruling banning photogs from following her

London, May 4 (ANI): Brit singer Amy Winehouse has won a legal ruling banning paparazzi photographers and “persons unknown” from following her or taking her pictures while out in public.

Winehouse, 25, has been battling it out in court in a bid to curb the number of snappers who trail her while she is in Britain, and now her legal team has secured a ruling, which targets London-based Big Pictures agency.

The court order means that any photographer, who follows the singer or approaches her new North London home within 100 metres (238 feet), will be persecuted.
Snappers are also prohibited from taking shots of her while she is visiting the homes of friends and family.

British newspaper The Guardian reports Winehouse sought the injunction over safety fears.

“Every time she got in her car she was chased or jostled, and it has become unsafe not just for her, but the people around her,” the Daily Star quoted a source as telling the publication.

“We don’t have a problem with the press doing their job but it has become mayhem a couple of times and Amy had to do something,” the source added. (ANI)

Proceedings issued in relation to alleged libelous publications: HPGPL

Chennai, Apr 28 (ANI/Business Wire India): Hiranandani Palace Gardens Private Ltd (HPGPL) announced that it has issued proceedings against Laxey Partners Ltd and two of its directors in relation to alleged libelous statements contained in three recent publications.

In its claim, HPGPL is seeking damages and an injunction to restrain the defendants from further publishing the alleged defamatory words.

HPGPL is the Project Company incorporated in India which owns the Hiranandani Palace Gardens mixed-use township project in Chennai, one of the projects in which Hirco PLC has invested. (ANI)

Malay Indian mom waits to get baby back from converted hubby

Ipoh, Apr 26 (ANI): Indian origin teacher in Malaysia M. Indira Gandhi spent a sleepless night at the Ipoh police district headquarters, waiting for her baby to be returned to her.

She had been there since the High Court here granted her interim custody of her three children and an injunction preventing her husband from entering their home.

On Friday, Judicial Commissioner Ridwan Ibrahim had also ordered police to assist Indira Gandhi, 34, in enforcing the orders, The Star reports.

However, Indira Gandhi said police told her to find K. Patmanathan, 40, before they could retrieve one-year-old Prasana Diksa.

Patmanathan had taken Prasana from their home in First Garden on April 4 after he had converted to Islam.

“If I could locate him, I definitely would have gone and brought my baby straight home. What are the police there for?”

When met at her place of vigil, Indira Gandhi said Patmanathan called her at 8.30pm on Friday to say he was on his way to Singapore.

She claimed he refused when she asked him to return Prasana.

“She is still breastfeeding and I have not done so for the past one month. I don’t know how she’s doing,” she said.

Patmanathan’s last known address was his mother’s house in Pasir Puteh.

Police refused to comment, but Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran said they had agreed to set up a special unit to trace the husband.

According to court documents, Indira Gandhi discovered that her husband had converted to Islam on March 11 and was now known as Mohd Ridzuan Abdullah. (ANI)

Michael Jackson’s possessions not for sale after settlement

LOS ANGELES: Michael Jackson’s possessions aren’t going to the auction block after all.

Julien’s Auction House and a spokesman for Jackson said on Tuesday that the singer will retain possession of some 2,000 items from Neverland Ranch as part of a dispute settlement. The exhibition to promote the sale, which has been open to the public, will continue through April 25.

Jackson’s production company sued auction organizer Darren Julien to halt the sale in early March. A judge blocked one effort by MJJ Productions to cancel it earlier this month, and another was scheduled to hear arguments on Wednesday for an injunction.

Julien has said he spent $2 million organizing the sale, which another auctioneer estimated could have fetched $12 million.

Taipei company sues Apple over touch screen patents

San Francisco, April 9 (DPA) Taipei-based company Elan Microelectronics has sued Apple for the alleged infringement of two of its touch screen patents in the iconic US technology company’s iPhone and other devices.

The suit was filed Tuesday in the US District Court in San Francisco, close to Apple’s Silicon Valley headquarters, court papers posted Wednesday showed.

Elan, which makes touchpads, claims it owns the patents covering the touch screen technology that has helped the iPhone, MacBook and other Apple products become huge hits.

The technology allows users to control a wide range of device functions by using their fingers to tap icons and letters on the screen, as well as to zoom into and out of images and flip them around. On the iPhone, for example, sliding two fingers together on the screen shrinks an image, while moving them apart enlarges it.

In its filing, Elan said it owned a ‘fundamental patent’ that ‘governed the detection of multiple fingers on a touch pad or touch-sensitive input device to enable the detection and use of a multi-finger gestures in various applications’.

Elan won a preliminary court injunction in a similar 2006 case against touchpad maker Synaptics, and the two companies settled the suit last year.

The company asked for unspecified monetary damages against Apple and an injunction preventing the company from selling touch screen devices.

Jacko memorabilia auction given go-ahead by court

Washington, April 4 (ANI): Michael Jackson’s lawyer have failed to obtain a court order to stop the auction of his Neverland Ranch belongings, scheduled for April 22-25.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Brett Klein has given the green light to Julien’s Auction House of Los Angeles to sell Jackson memorabilia.

Jackson had signed a deal with the auction house last summer, and agreed to move everything out of his Neverland Ranch, make an inventory and catalogs for a total sale.

However, he tried to renege when he realised the enormity of what he had done a couple of months ago.

“We acted honourably. We want to give Michael the best experience with this auction,” Fox News quoted Darren Julien, who made the arrangements with Jackson and his manager Tohme R. Tohme, as saying.

While Jackson and Tohme did not attend the hearing, the singer’s father Joseph did come to court.

He was said to be in contact with the ‘Thriller’ star through his iPhone.

“The judge found that Michael Jackson’s position was totally without merit,” said Julien’s attorney Jerry Hawxhurst.

Items set for sale include the front gates to Neverland, art work by Macaulay Culkin, and a carousel horse given to Jackson by Elizabeth Taylor.

Jackson’s attorney says that he will still try to get an injunction to stop the sale. (ANI)