Metallica fiasco: Organisers arrested, sent to jail

GURGAON : Four people, including a top official of the company organising the Metallica concert here, were sent to six days’ police custody after being arrested early Saturday on charges of cheating and breach of trust, officials said. The administration has also seized the Rs 1 crore security money deposited by the firm.

DNA Entertainment Networks, the event management company organising the concert, had on Friday cancelled the event at the last moment. Over 25,000 fans had gathered at the Leisure Valley Park here in Sector 29 to watch the concert, the opener for the ‘F1 Rocks’ series of performances for the Formula-1 race event at Greater Noida.

Upset over the cancellation, the fans had vandalised the stage and broke down barricades. Technical equipment, too, were destroyed as they threw chairs at the LED wall.

Police registered a case against DNA Entertainment Networks on the complaint of Gurgaon-resident Chanderpal Yadav, who had paid Rs 1 lakh for 10 tickets.

Rajesh Kumar, the general manager of DNA Networks, was arrested along with team members Umesh Chinara, Ashok Singh and Savio Faleiro, Gurgaon Sector 29 Station House Officer Jagdish Prasad said.

They were arrested under Section 406 (breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, Prasad said.

The four were presented in the court of magistrate Ashok Mann Saturday evening. Police had demanded 15 days’ custody for them, but the court agreed for six days’ remand.

Deputy Commissioner Police (east) Maheshwar Dayal said: “Some more arrests may be possible.”

“The tickets for the show were priced at Rs.10,000 (first class), Rs.2,750 and Rs.1,750. The fans had come from many cities and also countries like Bangladesh, China, Nepal, Indonesia and Singapore.

“Although there was no sitting arrangement at the venue, people were charged for first, second and third class, out of an estimated 30,000 tickets sold. More than 8,000 tickets were sold for the first class itself, which means they cheated fans of more than Rs.8 crore,” Dayal added.

Meanwhile, the district administration has begun the process to blacklist the company.

Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate P C Meena said: “We have served notice to DNA Entertainment to provide us a detailed payment refund plan in three days. We have also seized Rs 1 crore, the corporate guarantee money deposited by the company.”

The four-member American band, among the most famous heavy metal bands in the world, was to Friday stage its first ever performance in India.

Metallica is slated to perform in Bangalore on Sunday.

Sun Pictures CEO held

CHENNAI: Chennai police on Sunday arrested W Hansraj Saxena, chief executive officer of Sun Pictures, for allegedly cheating a film distributor to the tune of Rs 82.53 lakh. He was held as he came out of the city airport around 7.05 pm after a visit to Hyderabad.

Based on a complaint by the Kanda Films distribution head TS Selvaraj, K K Nagar police swung into action. Saxena has been charged under sections 406 (punishment for cheating), 420 (cheating), 385 (putting person in fear of injury in order to commit extortion) and 506 (1) (criminal intimidation) of Indian Penal Code.

Saxena was taken to the concerned police station from the airport and later produced before a magistrate who remanded him to police custody.

According to police, RK Reddy films produced the Tamil film ‘Theeratha Vilayattu Pillai’ starring Vishal. The movie was taken over by Sun Pictures.

Selvaraj who has been in the film distribution business submitted before the city police commissioner JK Tripathy, that Sun Pictures failed to give him Rs 82,53,374 lakh for the distribution rights he is owning. When Selvaraj tried to contact Saxena, he allegedly threatened him with dire consequences.

Saxena was named in the FIR registered by police here in 2010 for ransacking the checkers hotel in Saidapet area. However, police didn’t take any further action. While addressing the mediapersons at the his office, city police commissioner Tripathy said the checkers hotel attack case was pending before the court. There had been a buzz across the city for the past few days about Saxena’s imminent arrest.

“As Selvaraj has lodged the complaint against Sun Pictures, after detailed interrogation of Saxena, the other key personnel of the company will also be roped in the FIR,” a senior police officer said.

Former Goa Minister Pacheco accused in death of Nadia still at large

Panaji, June 11 (ANI): The prime suspect in Nadia Torrado”s mysterious death case, Goa’s former Tourism Minister Mickky Pacheco is still on the run.

On Thursday, a sessions court in Goa rejected Pacheco”s anticipatory bail petition.

The Goa Police is seeking Pacheco”s custody to question him on the charges of destroying evidence and culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Police have registered a case against Pacheco under sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and 201(causing disappearance of evidence of offence) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Pacheco is now likely to approach the Bombay High Court with the anticipatory bail plea. (ANI)

Bhopal gas tragedy victims want accused hanged

Bhopal, June 6 (IANS) Over 25 years after the Bhopal gas tragedy when the verdict in the case is to be pronounced Monday, the victims want capital punishment for the accused but are not too hopeful of getting full justice.

They feel the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has already ‘weakened’ the case.

The accused in the case include senior Indian executives of Union Carbide India Limited and Warren Anderson, former chairman of Union Carbide Corporation, US, which owned the Bhopal plant – who is absconding.

Rachna Dhingra of the Bhopal Group of Information and Action told IANS: ‘The folly committed by the accused should fetch no less than capital punishment for all of them. They should be hanged in public.’

‘We are being deceived since the beginning. The case, based on a charge sheet filed by the CBI Dec 1, 1987, against 12 parties, was originally to be tried under Section 304 Part II (culpable homicide not amounting to murder leading up to 10 years imprisonment) of the Indian Penal Code,’ Sadhna Karnik of Bhopal Gas Peedit Sangharsh Sehayog Samiti, who is also a victim, said Sunday.

‘This, however, was challenged by the accused in the Supreme Court which, in a September 1996 order, diluted the charges against the Indian accused to Section 304 A – causing death by negligence with maximum imprisonment up to two years,’ she added.

‘Now, even if the judgment pronounces them guilty, what does two years’ punishment mean and that too with the liberty to appeal in higher courts?’ Karnik asked.

Another activist, Abdul Jabbar of the Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Udyog Sanghathan (BGPMUS), accused the CBI of preparing and presenting a ‘weak’ charge sheet in the case.

‘More than 178 witnesses, belonging to weaker sections of society, were registered but several important witnesses were left out,’ he said.

‘A judgment such as this one, with a high-profile accused, has the potential to shape the future of how big business operates in the country,’ Jabbar said.

Activists also question the CBI’s role as it has not been able to produce Andersen, the prime accused in the case, even after two arrest warrants were issued against him, the last one in July 2009.

Dow Chemical Company, which took over the US-based Union Carbide Corporation in 1999, says all the liabilities were settled when the company paid $470 million compensation in a settlement brokered by the Indian Supreme Court.

The verdict will be pronounced Monday by Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Mohan P. Tiwari in the case, arguments for which closed May 13.

Four of the organisations representing victims Saturday accused the Indian government of criminal negligence in the prosecution of the accused in the case.

‘Justice will be done in Bhopal only if individuals and corporations responsible for the deaths of over 25,000 people and toxic exposure damage to over half a million are punished in an exemplary manner,’ said president of the Bhopal Gas Peedit Mahila Stationery Karmchari Sangh, Rashida Bee.

‘Eventually, the number of those affected was increased. But the compensation money was not, so each victim got far less than they should have and there are many who did not even get a single penny,’ said Balkrishna Namdeo of the Gas Peedit Nirashrit Pension Bhogi Sangharsh Morcha.

Tonnes of methyl-iso-cyanate (MIC) and other lethal gases that spewed out of the now defunct Union Carbide Corporation’s pesticide plant here on the intervening night of Dec 2-3, 1984, killed more than 3,500 people instantly and maimed thousands for life.

In the weeks that followed, 15,250 more people, who had inhaled the gas or consumed contaminated water, died, according to official figures. Victims’ rights group claim the toll was 25,000.

Nalini fears threat to life, probe ordered

Chennai, May 13 (ANI): Tamil Nadu Government has appointed a committee to look into the allegations by Nalini Sriharan, who is serving life term in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, that her life was under threat in jail.

The committee headed by DIG of Prisons (Coimbatore) Govindarajan would also go into her other charges, including harassment by jail officials at the high-security Vellore Women”s Prison, where she is lodged.

In two letters addressed to the Additional Director General of Police (prisons), copies of which were released to the media by her lawyers on Wednesday, Nalini accused jail officials of torturing her.”

She also alleged her cell had not been cleaned for days and expressed fears that officials may be ‘planting’ something and ‘recover’.

On May 10, the government had informed the State Assembly that she had made calls to foreign countries, including Sri Lanka and Britain, from a mobile phone seized from her cell.

Tamil Nadu Government had rejected the plea of Nalini and three other convicts in the case for premature release, based on a report by the prison advisory board.

Nalini has been convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts.

She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Nalini”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Congress President Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for her after she had had a baby daughter. (ANI)

Ex-Karnataka minister Halappa”s bail plea in court today

Shimoga, May 11 (ANI): The bail plea of former Karnataka minister Hartal Halappa who was arrested on charges of rape, will come up for hearing in the High Court today.

On Monday, his judicial custody was extended till May 24.

After his arrest on Sunday, Halappa was moved to a hospital after he complained of chest pain.

The charges against him include rape, intimidation, unlawful restraint and confinement. Halappa has denied the charges, accusing his political rivals of trying to malign him.

Chief Minister BS Yeddyurappa had on May 3 announced a CID probe after Halappa resigned on May 2 following a Kannada media report on the alleged incident that took place in November 2009.

Chandravati, the alleged rape victim, filed the complaint. She, her husband Venkatesh Murthy and a lawyer called on State Director General of Police Ajay Kumar Singh at his residence and filed a report against the minister.

She filed a complaint under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Murthy also released a CD to media, which contains visuals of Halappa in his house. (ANI)

Yeddyurappa orders CID probe to rape charge against Karnataka minister

Bangalore, May 3 (ANI): Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa has ordered a CID probe into the rape charges lodged by a woman against former State Food and Civil Supplies Minister H Halappa.

Talking to reporters here, Yeddyurappa said: “I have decided to order a CID probe. Let the truth come out. Whoever is guilty, should get punishment.”

Yeddyurappa further accused the opposition of trying to give a new form to the issue.

Halappa quit on Sunday after a leading Kannada daily published a front-page report alleging he sexually assaulted his friend”s wife.

Speaking to media after submitting his resignation to Yeddyurappa, Halappa said he was holding discussions with his lawyer to take further legal actions.

Halappa claimed that he resigned on moral grounds and to boost the morale of party workers.

After Halappa”s exit, the woman and her husband lodged a complaint of rape and criminal intimidation against him.

She filed a complaint under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

She also released a CD to media, which contains visuals of Halappa in his house. (ANI)

Modi was a victim of unfair vilification, says Bindra

New Delhi, April 29 (IANS) Former Indian cricket board president Inderjit Singh Bindra, an influential member of the Indian Premier League (IPL) Governing Council, feels suspended IPL chairman Lalit Modi was a victim of unfair vilification and lauded him as marketing genius who has changed the landscape of Indian crikcet.

Saying that he is not holding any brief for Modi, Bindra said the IPL commissioner deserved a better appreciation of his work and a fair trial if anyone thinks he has committed any serious mistakes.

‘The time has arrived for me to post some appropriate questions that have been nagging my mind and have interest in the public eye. Is Lalit Modi a builder of the greatest sporting brand in the world in a short span of three years or a villain who has undermined the foundations of the edifice of Indian cricket?’ said Bindra.

‘In the final analysis, I would like to make it abundantly clear that I hold no brief on behalf of Mr. Modi. Some of the issues which have cropped up concern some alleged violations of laws relating to the FEMA and money laundering and some allegedly serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and are outside the jurisdiction of either the GC or the Working Committee of the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) or the General Body,’ Bindra noted.

‘However, I am not going to prejudge the issue and in accordance with the constitutional and principles of jurisprudence enshrined in our democratic fabric I will refuse to hold anyone guilty before giving a fair opportunity. I refuse to be swayed by media frenzy in determining vital issues concerning the reputation of not only an individual but also a brand and the reputation of Indian cricket,’ he said.

Bindra said he was pleased to read the extracts of Indian cricket board president Shashank Manohar’s press briefing wherein he has offered to be totally objective and impartial in the application of the rules and regulations of the board.

‘The unfolding events of recent weeks have, undoubtedly, created a crisis that has been fueled by massive media frenzy. Indian cricket has come under threat. The uncontrolled cascade of public perceptions is threatening to tear asunder the wonderful fabric of cricket built thread by thread by many legends,’ Bindra said.

‘This mosaic of cricketing leadership was woven by the blood, sweat and tears of on-field galaxy of outstanding players and honorary officials working with missionary zeal and unwavering commitment,’ said Bindra, recalling the efforts so many cricket administrators in promoting the sport in the country.

‘I was fortunate to step into the shoes of Mr. (Madhavrao) Scindia due to the efforts of many friends, including Mr. Jagmohan Dalmiya. This period witnessed the final breaking of the monopoly of Doordarshan for broadcasting rights as per the 1994 decision of the Supreme Court. It was an epoch transformation that attained its full potential post change of regime in November 2005,’ g

On Modi, he said: ‘It was due to the marketing genius of a maverick — Lalit Modi — that Indian cricket finally emerged as a colossus in the international firmament in terms of reach and financial clout. Indian cricket became the epicenter of world cricket and the envy of the cricketing fraternity during this key phase.’

‘Lalit Modi is unquestionably responsible for converting Indian cricket into a financial giant and for creating a truly global international brand in the IPL. His positioning, branding and commercial savvy puts the League in the ranks of true marketing icons akin to the many success stories dissected as case studies in leading business schools across the globe.’

‘It is a sad surprise that he has suddenly become an object of vilification. All hell broke loose in the media based on some leaks from so called reliable sources within the board and some statements made by principal players in the whole drama. It is disappointing that the vast majority of the media has so far not taken a balanced perspective to the affair,’ he added.

Bindra felt sad that the IPL, a successful global sporting brand has overnight became an object of ridicule and vilification in what was a veritable trial by media.

‘Make no mistake, I am not sitting here to protect anyone or apportion blame at this stage. I would not like us to rush to judgment. For somebody who has been closely associated with the developments in the international cricketing arena since 1982, I cannot but painfully ponder how and why?’ said Bindra.

He also held the cricket fraternity for the ongoing controversy in the IPL.

‘I can opine with conviction that part of the blame lies with our own cricketing fraternity for being an instrument in leaking all kinds of unconfirmed reports without veracity or merit. The media has been ready with the guillotine to hang the hero of the IPL. He has been accused of match fixing, rigging of bids, laundering of money, and all kinds of allegations pertaining to financial irregularities and dealings based on unsubstantiated evidence,’ he said.

Kashmir Police registers case against unknown miscreants in Srinagar

Srinagar, Apr 30 (ANI): The Jammu and Kashmir police have registered a case against unknown miscreants here in connection with the death of a civilian due to stones pelting.

Police have launched a hunt to identify the stone-throwers and have registered a case against the miscreants under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with punishment for murder.

“This morning, some miscreants started throwing stones at the vehicles. One of the stones hit a person sitting in one of the vehicles. He was taken to the hospital, but he died on the way. His name is Shafiq Ahmad Sheikh and is a resident of Natipora in Srinagar,” said Srinagar Superintendent of Police (SP) Muhammad Irshad.

“We have registered a case under IPC 302, investigation is on and we are trying to arrest the culprits,” he added.

According to the police, the offenders were trying to enforce a shutdown of public transport.

“My bus was full of passengers and I had just reached Batmaloo. There was one more car in front of me, when some people started throwing stones at us. The vehicle in front turned and so did I. Many stones hit my bus, and one of them broke a window and hit a passenger,” said Abid Hussian, the driver of the bus.

“He was injured and people took him out of the bus and with the police they took him to Shri Maharaja Hari Singh (SMHS) Hospital. The doctor said that his condition was very bad and they referred him to SKIMS (Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences). I don”t know after that,” he added.

Shafiq Ahmed Shiekh, a government employee and resident of Srinagar was killed after stone pelters attacked the minibus he was travelling in.

He succumbed to his injuries after being hit in the head. (ANI)

Top Pak human rights activist coming to India on Ayesha’s mother’s request

Karachi, Apr.7 (ANI): Former federal minister and a leading Pakistani human rights activists Ansar Burney has termed the controversy surrounding cricketer Shoaib Malik and Indian tennis star Sania Mirza as an issue of ‘human dignity’ and ‘women rights’, and said he would soon be visiting India to ‘dig out’ the truth.

Burney said he decided to visit India after receiving a phone call from Ayesha Siddiqui’s mother requesting him to help the family and investigate the truth.

Burney said the marriage of Shoaib with Sania is their personal matter and he has nothing to do with it, but Ayesha’s claim has created serious doubts of alleged cheating and fraud.

“If the claim of Ayesha Siddiqui is correct then the Ansar Burney Trust will ask Shoaib Malik to accept his earlier marriage and say sorry to Ayesha, and if her claims are not proved she will have to say sorry,” The News quoted Burney, as saying.

Burney said he has already approached the Indian High Commission in Islamabad to issue him visa for India urgently, so that he could visit India to sort out issues between the Siddiquis’ and the Maliks’.

Earlier, Shoaib’s brother-in-law Imran Zafar arrived in New Delhi to seek legal action against the Siddiquis’, who have lodged a complaint against the all rounder.

Meanwhile, the Pakistani Government has stepped in and is keeping a watchful eye on the Sania-Shoaib-Ayesha muddle.

Pakistan has reportedly sent a diplomatic note to India, and requested for returning Malik’s passport as soon as possible.

Shoaib’s passport was seized by the Hyderabad police after Ayesha had lodged a police complaint with the Hyderabad Police against Shoaib under sections 498 A (harassment), 420 (cheating) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code.

The Siddiquis’ claim that Malik married their daughter Ayesha in 2002, but has not divorced her till date. (ANI)

Another honour killing in Punjab

Amritsar (Punjab), Mar 31 (ANI): In yet another case of honour killing, a couple was shot dead in Punjab on the orders of the girl””s father for marrying against his wishes.

It has been reported that the victims Prabhjot Kaur and Pradeep Singh from Ferozepur, both students of Class 12 were shot dead by five unidentified gunmen, when they arrived at a local school in Amritsar for their board examinations.

The killers fled the spot after the murder and snatched the carbine of a security guard accompanying the couple. The victims were provided police protection on the orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court after their marriage.

There are reports that as many as 15 bullets were fired at the couple, who died on the spot.

“This incident should not have happened. But the boy””s behaviour was not correct. He had left his first wife and also has a child. He married his wife””s niece. It is a case of personal enmity,” said Sukhdev Singh Brar, Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Firozepur.

“A number of cases were registered against him. The girl is from the same family. We will round up those involved soon,” added Brar.

It has been reported that the government is now contemplating to include the crime in the IPC (Indian Penal Code).

The government had earlier said that a proposal to amend the Indian Penal Code to deal with honour killings is under consideration. However, it was not clear by when will the amendment come into practice.

In a landmark judgement, the Karnal sessions court on Tuesday awarded death sentence to the five accused and life-term to the leader of the Khap Panchayat for murder of a newly married couple. (ANI)

Tamil Nadu Government rejects calls for Nalini Sriharan”s premature release

Chennai, Mar 29 (ANI): The Tamil Nadu Government on Monday accepted the recommendations of the Prison Advisory Board to refuse premature release to former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi”s assassin, Nalini Sriharan.

The Tamil Nadu Government was to deliver a verdict on Nalini”s premature release on Monday.

The Karunanidhi- led Dravida Munettra Kazhagam (DMK) Government had on March 11 said it would take a final call on Sriharan”s plea in two weeks time.

The counsel for the State Government is said to have given this assurance to the Madras High Court.

The state government also submitted the Prison Advisory Board report to the High Court.

“Hopefully, we should be able to report the decision before March 29, but the truth of the matter is the government has asked for certain additional details from the board and collector,” said P S Raman, Advocate General of the Tamil Nadu Government.

“For some factors, beyond the government”s control, if the decision making process takes a little longer we may have to ask the court for some more time,” added Raman.

Earlier on March 10, a two-judge bench of the high court, comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice K.K. Sasidharan, had asked the State Government to submit their report on March 11.

Tamil Nadu Government advocate G.Desingu claimed the Government had just received the report and sought time to study it.
Nalini, who is undergoing life imprisonment, is lodged in the Vellore Central Jail.

In her petition, she said she was entitled for release as far as 2005, as she had completed 14 years in jail.

Nalini was convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts. She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Sriharan”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for Nalini after she had a baby daughter.

In September 2009, Nalini went on a hunger strike demanding that she be set free. (ANI)

Tamil Nadu Government to pronounce judgement on Nalini”s release

Chennai, Mar 29 (ANI): The Tamil Nadu Government will in all probability deliver a verdict on the premature release of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi”s assassin Nalini Sriharan on Monday.

However, it has been reported that the Karunanidhi- led Dravida Munettra Kazhagam (DMK) Government might take some more time in pronouncing its decision as Karunanidhi had earlier hinted that any decision
on such a sensitive matter has to be taken with care.
The State Government had on March 11 said it would take a final call on Sriharan”s plea in two weeks time.
The counsel for the State Government is said to have given this assurance to the Madras High Court.
The state government also submitted the Prison Advisory Board report to the High Court.
“Hopefully, we should be able to report the decision before March 29, but the truth of the matter is the government has asked for certain additional details from the board and collector,” said P S Raman, Advocate General of the Tamil Nadu Government.

“For some factors, beyond the government”s control, if the decision making process takes a little longer we may have to ask the court for some more time,” added Raman.

Earlier on March 10, a two-judge bench of the high court, comprising Justice Elipe Dharma Rao and Justice K.K. Sasidharan, had asked the State Government to submit their report on March 11.

Tamil Nadu Government advocate G.Desingu claimed the Government had just received the report and sought time to study it.

Nalini, who is undergoing life imprisonment, is lodged in the Vellore Central Jail.
In her petition, she said she was entitled for release as far as 2005, as she had completed 14 years in jail.

Nalini was convicted on 16 counts of murder, and found guilty under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code on all counts. She was also convicted under Section 3 of TADA and Section 120-B of the IPC, dealing with conspiracy.

Sriharan”s original death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment after Sonia Gandhi sought a reprieve for Nalini after she had a baby daughter.

In September 2009, Nalini went on a hunger strike demanding that she be set free. (ANI)

Patna Court awards life imprisonment to three accused in Dubey murder case

Patna, Mar 27 (ANI): A Patna Sessions Court on Saturday sentenced all the three accused of the murder of National Highway engineer Satyendra Dubey to life imprisonment.

Additional Session Judge Raghvendra Kumar Singh sentenced three accused — Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar and Pinku Ravidas–to undergo life imprisonment.

On Monday, the court convicted accused Mantu Kumar under Indian Penal Code (IPC) section 302 (Murder), 394 (Voluntary causing hurt in committing robbery) and 27 (A) Arms Act for possessing unlicensed weapon.

The other two accused were convicted under Section 302/34 (Murder committed in furtherance of common intention) and 394 IPC.

Dubey was a project director at the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI).

On November 27, 2003, Dubey was shot dead in the early hours in front of a Circuit House in Bihar’s Gaya District.

In December 2003 the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the investigation from Bihar Police and arrested four persons –Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar, Pinku Ravidas and Sharvan Kumar, all residents of Katari village in Gaya District.

According to the CBI, on the night of 27 November 2003, the accused robbed Dubey of his belongings and during the ensuing scuffle, Mantu Kumar shot him dead with a .315 country-made pistol.

A fourth accused Sharvan Kumar gave a full and voluntary disclosure about the incident after turning approver.

Faced with the possibility of high-level corruption within the NHAI, Dubey wrote directly to the then Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, detailing the financial and contractual irregularities in the project.

While the letter was not signed, he attached a separate bio-data so that the matter would be taken more seriously.

According to the CBI, during the investigation of the aforesaid case, the agency learnt that Dubey had earlier addressed a confidential letter to the then Prime Minister Vajapayee, which was received in the PMO on November 11, 2002.

“The letter highlighted the areas of the National Highway Development Project “Golden Quadrilateral South-North, East-West Corridor” which were prone to corruption and required corrective measures,” the CBI said.

Vide his letter, Dubey had requested to keep his identity secret while emphasising the information as credible.

Dubey had also suggested steps to verify the information contained in the said letter. He had further addressed a letter dated May 2, 2003 to the Chief Vigilance Officer of the NHAI, with the objective of improving the system so as to achieve the optimum and desired output in the implementation of the project, the CBI said.

The information as contained in his letters was further developed into credible information by investigators and a separate case was registered on September 26, 2004 in New Delhi against the Senior Officers of NHAI and the construction company, the CBI added.

The case is presently under trial in the Court of Special Judge (South) Patna.

In a statement the CBI said, the investigation into the case of robbery and murder of Dubey was pursued in all plausible directions including possible conspiracy hatched by the contractors and mafia to eliminate him as alleged by Dubey’s brother Dhananjay Kumar.

During the investigations the CBI examined a number of officials, contractors and engineers connected with the NHAI Project, with reference to the issues raised by deceased Dubey in his letter addressed to the Prime Minister.

The CBI also cross examined Dubey’s close friends to find out if he had disclosed any threat to his life particularly from any contractor or mafia after he had sent the complaint to the Prime Minister of India.

The investigating agency also examined Dubey’s personal staff including his stenographer, peon and driver.

However, the CBI said no evidence came on record showing that the contractors eliminated Dubey under any conspiracy or mafia as alleged in the complaint of his brother.

In a statement the CBI spokesperson, Harsh Bhal, said in New Delhi that the investigating agency is fully committed to protecting the whistle blower against his or her harassment or victimization etc.

CBI Special Prosecutor L.R. Ansari argued the case in the Court.

Dubey”s murder drew several protests in India and abroad, especially by the media.

Student and Alumni bodies of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) took the lead in raising this issue.

The S. K. Dubey Foundation for Fight Against Corruption was founded in the US by Dubey’s IIT Kanpur batchmates to systematically fight against corruption.

IIT Kanpur instituted an annual award in his name, Satyendra K Dubey Memorial Award, to be given to an IIT alumnus for displaying highest professional integrity in upholding human values.(ANI)

CBI court to pronounce judgement in Satyendranath Dubey murder case

Patna, Mar 27 (ANI): A Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court in Patna will pronounce its judgement in National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) engineer Satyendranath Dubey murder case today.

The court had convicted three accused-Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar and Pinku Ravidas for murdering Dubey on Monday, and said the sentence would be pronounced on Saturday.

Dubey was a project director with the National Highways Authority of India and on November 27, 2003, shot dead in front of the Gaya Circuit House.

Dubey had written directly to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, in which he mentioned financial and contractual irregularities in a NHAI project.

While the letter was not signed, he attached a separate bio-data so that the matter would be taken up more seriously.
Mantu Kumar was convicted under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 302 (Murder), 394 (Voluntary causing hurt in committing robbery) and Section 27 (A) of the Arms Act for possessing an unlicensed weapon.

The other two accused were convicted under Section 302/34 (Murder committed in furtherance of common intention) and 394 IPC.

In December 2003, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the investigation from Bihar Police and arrested Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar, Pinku Ravidas and Sharvan Kumar, all residents of Katari village in Bihar”s Gaya District.

According to CBI, on November 27, 2003, the accused robbed Dubey of his belongings and shot him dead with a .315 country-made pistol.

The CBI also recovered a briefcase containing documents belonging to Dubey, including his identity card, from an abandoned well.

The country-made .315 pistol used during the robbery and murder of Dubey was also recovered.

Sharvan Kumar gave a full and voluntary disclosure about the incident after turning approver.

Dubey”s murder drew several protests in India and abroad, especially by the media.

Student and alumni bodies of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)s took the lead in raising the issue.

The S. K. Dubey Foundation for the Fight Against Corruption was founded in the US by Dubey”s IIT Kanpur batchmates to systematically fight corruption.

IIT Kanpur instituted an annual award in his name, Satyendra K Dubey Memorial Award, to be given to an IIT alumnus for displaying the highest professional integrity in upholding human values.

Dubey was recognised posthumously by several awards, which included the Whistleblower of the Year Award from the London-based Index on Censorship, the Transparency International”s Annual Integrity Award and the Service Excellence Award from the All India Management Association. (ANI)

Babri mosque demolition: IPS officer Gupta appears before Rae Bareilly court

Rae Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh), Mar 26 (ANI): Senior Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Anju Gupta, who is on deputation with the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) in Delhi has arrived at a Rae Bareilly court to record her testimony as a witness for the prosecution against senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Lal Krishna Advani and other Sangh Parivar leaders.

Gupta was posted as Advani”s personal security officer during the period when the BJP was bringing its supporters to Ayodhya for ”kar seva” at the mosque, claimed by the Sangh Parivar to be the birthplace of Lord Rama.

Immediately after the riots in 1993, Gupta had told the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) how Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti and the rest had expressed delight over the demolition of the mosque.

CBI Director Ashwani Kumar had reportedly written to Cabinet Secretary K Chandrashekhar urging him to release Gupta for the important hearing on the Babri Mosque demolition case.

A special Ayodhya court in Rae Bareilly had earlier discharged Advani on the plea that charges against him were based on mere suspicion. The CBI dropped the charge of criminal conspiracy – Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – in its revised charge sheet submitted before the Rae Bareilly court on the directives of the Allahabad High Court.

The revised chargesheet contained relatively milder sections under the Indian Penal Code – Sections 153-A, 153-B (propagating communal violence), 147, 149 (rioting) and 505 (spreading ill-will). This was believed to be the result of CBI”s failure to press the charges strongly. (ANI)

Supreme Court rejects Sahabuddin”s plea

New Delhi, Mar 25 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed the plea filed by Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Mohammed Sahabuddin challenging the Bihar Government”s decision to conduct his trial in Siwan Jail with regard to the various criminal cases registered against him.

The apex court upholding the State Government”s decision to hold criminal trial against him in jail said the notification issued by the government and the Patna High Court is valid.

It added that even though the criminal cases require a public and open trial, in extraordinary circumstances it can be conducted within the jail premises.

Forty-two year old Sahabuddin is facing trial in over 40 criminal cases registered against him under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code. (ANI)

Babri mosque demolition: IPS officer Gupta to appear in Rae Bareilly court

Rae Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh), Mar 25 (ANI): Senior Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Anju Gupta, who is on deputation with the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) in Delhi might record her testimony as a witness for the prosecution against senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Lal Krishna Advani and other Sangh Parivar leaders in a Rae Bareilly court on Friday.

Gupta was posted as Advani”s personal security officer during the period when the BJP was bringing its supporters to Ayodhya for ”kar seva” at the mosque, claimed by the Sangh Parivar to be the birthplace of Lord Rama.

Immediately after the riots in 1993, Gupta had told the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) how Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti and the rest had expressed delight.

CBI Director Ashwani Kumar had reportedly written to Cabinet Secretary K Chandrashekhar urging him to release Gupta for the important hearing on the Babri Mosque demolition case.

A special Ayodhya court in Rae Bareilly had earlier discharged Advani on the plea that charges against him were based on mere suspicion. The CBI dropped the charge of criminal conspiracy – Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – in its revised charge sheet submitted before the Rae Bareilly court on the directives of the Allahabad High Court.

The revised chargesheet contained relatively milder sections under the Indian Penal Code – Sections 153-A, 153-B (propagating communal violence), 147, 149 (rioting) and 505 (spreading ill-will). This was believed to be the result of CBI”s failure to press the charges strongly. (ANI)

Three convicted in Satyendra Dubey’s murder case

Patna, Mar 22 (ANI): A Patna Court on Monday convicted three accused in National Highway engineer Satyendranath Dubey murder case.

Dubey was a project director at the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI).

Patna Additional Judge convicted the three accused–Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar and Pinku Ravidas for murdering Dubey and said the sentence would be pronounced on Saturday.

On November 27, 2003, Dubey was shot dead in the early hours in front of Gaya Circuit House.

Faced with the possibility of high-level corruption within the NHAI, Dubey wrote directly to the then Prime Minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, detailing the financial and contractual irregularities in the project.

While the letter was not signed, he attached a separate bio-data so that the matter would be taken more seriously.

The court convicted accused Mantu Kumar under Indian Penal Code (IPC) section 302 (Murder), 394 (Voluntary causing hurt in committing robbery) and 27 (A) Arms Act for possessing unlicensed weapon.

The other two accused were convicted under Section 302/34 (Murder committed in furtherance of common intention) and 394 IPC.

In December, 2003 the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took the investigation from Bihar Police and arrested four persons –Mantu Kumar, Udai Kumar, Pinku Ravidas and Sharvan Kumar, all residents of Katari village in Gaya District of Bihar.

According to CBI, on the night of 27 November 2003, the accused persons robbed Dubey of his belongings and during the ensuing scuffle, Mantu Kumar shot him dead with a .315 country-made weapon.

During the investigation the CBI recovered a briefcase containing documents belonging to Dubey including his Identity card, from an abandoned well.

The investigating agency also recovered the country-made .315 pistol, used for the robbery and murder of Dubey.

Accused Sharvan Kumar gave full and voluntary disclosure about the incident and was made an approver.

Dubey”s murder drew several protests in India and abroad, especially by the media.

Student and Alumni bodies of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)s took the lead in raising this issue.

S. K. Dubey Foundation for Fight Against Corruption was founded in the US by Dubey’s IIT Kanpur batchmates to systematically fight against corruption.

IIT Kanpur instituted an annual award in his name, Satyendra K Dubey Memorial Award, to be given to an IIT alumnus for displaying highest professional integrity in upholding human values.

Dubey was recognised posthumously by several awards, which included the Whistleblower of the year award from the London-based Index on Censorship, the Transparency International”s Annual integrity award and the Service Excellence award from the All India Management Association.(ANI)

Two ex-President Bodyguards get life term in Budha Jayanti Park gang rape case

New Delhi, Aug 22 (ANI): A Delhi court on Friday sentenced two former members of the President’s Bodyguard to life imprisonment in connection with the 2003 Budha Jayanti Park rape case.

The court also sentenced two other convicts to ten years each in prison.

On August 17, Additional Sessions Judge S.K. Sarvaria held Harpreet Singh, Satyender Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Manish Kumar of the elite President’s Bodyguard guilty of gang rape, kidnapping and robbery under the various provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Of four convicts, Satender and Harpeet who were convicted of gang rape, abduction and robbery will get life imprisonment, while Kuldeep and Manish, who were convicted for abduction, robbery and common intention, have been sentenced for ten years of imprisonment.

The court acquitted Kuldeep and Manish, of the charges of gang rape.

The victim, a 17-year-old student of the Delhi University, had gone with her friend to the park – which is located near Rashtrapati Bhavan on October 6, 2003.

The prosecution alleged that Harpreet and Satender raped her while the other two kept guard.

The incident shocked the national capital six years ago.(ANI)