Samantha Cameron to discover new level of fame as Britain”s new “first lady”

London, May 12 (ANI): No stranger to front pages of newspapers, Samantha Cameron will discover a whole new level of fame as Britain’s ‘first lady’.

She is poised and elegant, and has received a good deal of attention from both broadsheets and glossy magazines.

Cameron is pregnant with their baby at five months, who will soon join six-year-old Nancy and four-year-old Arthur Elwen.

She has been a valuable partner to husband, David Cameron, who she encouraged to be open about their lives at Notting Hill and also released smiling family portraits and video blogs to the electorate since he became party leader.

Now working as the creative director of thriving high-end stationery firm, Smythson, Samantha Sheffield was brought up on her family”s sprawling estate in Lincolnshire, near Scunthorpe. Her mother, Annabel Jones, divorced her father, Sir Reginald Sheffield, when Samantha was young – and subsequently married former Tory minister Lord Astor.

Samantha was a teenager when she was introduced to David Cameron by her friend Clare, his younger sister. The couple dated while she was an art student in Bristol and he was advising the then Chancellor Norman Lamont in London. They married in 1996.

Samantha made her first public appearance in an interview on ITV1.
She was a solid support to her husband during campaigning days too, when polls predicting a hung parliament started to mount.

“We”ve been together 18 years now and we”ve been through some fairly tough times, and I can honestly say that I don”t think in all that time he”s ever let me down,” The Scotsman quoted her as saying. (ANI)

Lib-Dems, Tories may agree on �economic deal� to reassure markets

London, May 10 (ANI): In what could be a decisive factor leading to the formation of a coalition in the House of Commons, Nick Clegg and David Cameron are close to agreeing to an �economic deal.�

This is especially significant, since British markets have registered fluctuations with the pound depreciating after it came to light that Britain was heading for a hung parliament.

The move will allay investors� fears about the market that has already faced rough weather following the crisis in Greece.

Tory leader William Hague, explained how the basis of a deal would be rooted in an economic agreement, The Telegraph reports.

“We are agreed that a central part of any agreement that we make will be economic stability and a reduction of the budget deficit,� the paper quoted him as saying.

He added that “political reform, economic issues and the reduction of the deficit, banking reform, civil liberties, environmental issues” has also been discussed.

Interestingly, Nick Clegg met Gordon Brown for a meeting to work out a new deal with the Labour Party while his negotiators were immersed in talks with Tory party negotiators in a neighbouring building.

Meanwhile, Labour Party top-brass are urging Brown to abdicate his position in order for an alliance with the Lib-Dems to come through.

Brown, however, is extremely reluctant to give up the Prime Ministership, he is hastily trying to stitch together a shaky coalition with minority parties instead. This inspite of his own party members coaxing him to step down with dignity.

A Lib Dem- Lab deal seems unlikely in the current scenario.

Lord Ashdown, the former Lib Dem leader and close ally of Clegg, said of Brown: “Amongst his personal qualities is not one that makes him an easy or very able leader of a collegiate-style government.” (ANI)

FACTBOX – British newspapers comment on hung parliament

REUTERS – Britain’s parliamentary election resulted in no one party winning an overall majority, but with the main opposition Conservatives securing the most seats.

Below are editorial comments from British newspapers on Saturday.

FINANCIAL TIMES

In an eerie display of collective intuition, the individual choices of millions of voters contrived to align perfectly the parliamentary arithmetic with the angry ambivalence of the national mood. Mr [David] Cameron had done enough to secure the keys of 10 Downing Street, the voters judged, but not enough to be granted a free hand.

TELEGRAPH

As the prospect of days if not weeks, of uncertainty, of the lack of a government, dawned on investors they responded in the only way they knew and dumped anything with a UK hallmark. These were not Black-Wednesday-style collapses in sterling and gilt prices, but they were enough to send a potent reminder to policymakers: there is no patience for horse-trading in the face of the biggest budget deficit in modern history.

TIMES

Nothing will tip the electorate more finally into the Tory party’s lap than the spectacle of a prime minister having to have his fingers prised from the doorframe of 10 Downing Street [his official London residence].

GUARDIAN

This weekend, Labour and the Liberal Democrats should strike a fixed-term deal to secure the economic recovery, assure the markets about key spending plans and hold an early referendum on electoral reform, with a general election on the new system to follow. The 2010 general election was a vote against the old politics. The Liberal Democrats and Labour must now seize the hour and finish the job.”

INDEPENDENT

However this vacuum becomes filled in the short term, it is a statement of the obvious that in the longer term only a written constitution will do. With those pictures of sub-third world polling station incompetence beaming across the globe, with the planet gazing upon our paralysis as the Greek contagion spreads in our direction, the humiliation can be tolerated no longer.

MIRROR

The Tories won — just. Spinning it any other way is an insult to democracy. Not to mention our intelligence. The Tories had two million more votes than Labour. That is the reality and the sooner we start living with it, the better.

And if Labour and the Lib Dems contrive to keep David Cameron out of Downing Street, then the next time we have a general election then I have the feeling that the British people will bury them both.

Daily Mail

[Nick] Clegg must be careful not to overplay his hand. If he props up a bankrupt, discredited Labour government rejected by the British people, simply to secure a self-interested deal on electoral reform, he won’t be forgiven.

THE SUN

What Britain sorely needs is a decisive reaction to show the world we are serious about balancing the books and cutting our 900 billion pounds debt mountain. Instead, against the backdrop of a global financial crisis, we have a weekend of politicians locked in rooms trying to thrash out who is moving into 10 Downing Street.

Nick Clegg may play kingmaker in a hung British parliament

London, May 7 (IANS) Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg may hold the key to power as the election results, as per early exit polls, point to a hung parliament. Clegg faces a painful dilemma – to tango with Labour leader Gordon Brown or shake hands with Conservative leader David Cameron.

In case the Conservatives fail to get an overall majority in the House of Commons, Clegg would be the man who would take a call on who enters No. 10 Downing Street.

The Telegraph reported that Clegg could join a formal coalition with either Brown or Cameron in return for government jobs for him and his senior colleagues. Or he could agree to a ‘non-aggression pact’ in which he supported a minority government run by the largest party.

Clegg has attempted to keep his options open during campaigning by insisting that his commitments were only towards his manifesto pledges of fairer taxes, better education and economic and political reform.

Exit polls released after polling stations closed Thursday evening predicted a hung parliament in which neither of Britain’s two main parties would gain an overall majority.

The exit polls gave the David Cameron-led Conservatives 307 seats, 19 short of an outright majority. The Labour Party would win 255 seats, compared with 356 in 2005, and the Liberals were given 59 seats, remaining behind expectations.

Klegg has repeatedly said that whichever party won ‘the most votes and seats’ had the right to govern, and in turn he would extend support to it.

Labour has lost mandate to govern: David Cameron

London, May 7 (IANS) Conservative leader David Cameron Friday morning asked Gordon Brown to vacate No.10 Downing Street as Labour ‘had clearly lost its mandate to govern’.

Exit polls show that the Conservatives could be the largest party in a hung parliament.

‘What is clear from these results is that our country wants change. That change is going to require new leadership. We will stand ready to do all we can to bring that leadership,’ Daily Mail quoted Cameron as saying.

He said that Labour ‘had clearly lost its mandate to govern’

There were significant swings from Labour to the Tories in the first two seats to declared. It was 11.6 percent in Washington and Sunderland West and 8.4 percent in Houghton and Sunderland South.

Brown told constituents: ‘The outcome of this country’s vote is not yet known, but my duty to the country, coming out of this election, is to play my part in Britain having a strong, stable and principled government, able to lead Britain into sustained economic recovery.’

He thanked supporters for their unwavering support and also thanked his wife, Sarah, for her love and support.

UK Conservatives become largest party, no majority

Britain’s opposition Conservatives won the most seats in parliament on Friday but failed to gain an overall majority, creating uncertainty over who will lead a country facing huge economic problems.

British asset prices crumbled as the prospect of the first inconclusive election result since 1974 unnerved investors already spooked by a global equity market sell-off.

With results in 615 constituencies declared, the Conservatives were on 290 and could not get to the figure of 326 needed for an outright majority in parliament.

Conservative leader David Cameron said the ruling Labour party had “lost its mandate to govern”.

However, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has the right under the constitution to try to form a government first, potentially opening the door to a period of political horse-trading.

Senior Labour minister Peter Mandelson said he did not expect Brown to resign on Friday. He said he was ruling nothing in or out, and he and others in the party appeared to be wooing the centrist Liberal Democrats.

“I don’t think it would help matters if he (Brown) were suddenly to step aside,” Mandelson said.

However, Labour, in power since 1997, could struggle to form a coalition with the Lib Dems since their combined forecast seats would still be short of an overall majority.

The Conservatives could seek a pact with smaller parties from Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales to boost their support.

MARKETS SWOON

The prospect of a “hung parliament” rocked already febrile financial markets.

The pound tumbled, Britain’s top share index extended this week’s rout and gilt futures went into reverse as the inconclusive election outcome unnerved investors jittery about Europe’s mounting debt crisis.

“The net result is masses of uncertainty. The new government is likely to be weak at best,” said Alan Clarke of BNP Paribas.

“Even in the case of a coalition, the partners will be constantly looking over their shoulders, and compromise politics will mean that the scope for delivering radical or unpopular fiscal tightening is limited.”

Clarke said there was now a growing threat of a credit ratings downgrade for Britain, where the deficit is running at more than 11 percent of national output.

“Ahead of the election we saw the risk of downgrade at close to 50 percent. On the basis of the election outcome as it looks now, a downgrade looks to be the most likely outcome,” he said.

For multimedia coverage, see http://r.reuters.com/quq44j

COALITION PUZZLE

The focus switches on Friday to possible talks between the parties to break the deadlock. They will be assisted by civil servants who have prepared briefing documents outlining key elements of party proposals and their costs.

Britain does not have the same tradition of coalition building as its neighbours in continental Europe, and few Britons can remember the last inconclusive election almost four decades ago.

The sense of confusion was heightened by reports that hundreds of voters had been turned away from crowded polling stations across the country when voting ended at 2100 GMT.

The centre-right Conservatives were forecast to win around 305 seats and Labour 255 in the lower House of Commons. The Lib Dems were a distant third, with an expected 61.

The BBC calculated that the Conservatives had taken 36 percent of the vote, Labour 29 percent and the Lib Dems 23 percent.

Notable losses for Labour included former cabinet ministers Charles Clarke and Jacqui Smith. Northern Ireland’s first

minister, Peter Robinson, of the Democratic Unionist Party, was the highest-profile casualty of the night. Gainers included the Greens, who won their first ever parliamentary seat.

Independent think-tanks have accused all the parties of failing to be open with voters about the scale of cuts that will be needed to restore public finances, meaning any government could face a rapid plunge in popularity once cuts begin.

Libs seething as Labor reinstalled in Tasmania

Labor caretaker Premier David Bartlett has been asked by the state’s governor to test his support on the floor of the House of Assembly.

But the fallout from the decision has already begun, with the Liberal Party accusing Labor of acting dishonourably.

Tasmanian Governor Peter Underwood released a statement this afternoon saying he had asked Mr Bartlett to form minority government.

Mr Underwood said Mr Bartlett had an obligation to form a government so its strength could be tested on the floor of the House of Assembly.

Mr Bartlett said he was determined to make the new government work.

“I want this job and I’m very pleased that the Governor has asked me to commission a government,” he said.

“I will do everything I can to make this work. This is too important not to allow it to work.

“Jobs are at stake. Our economy is at stake.”

But yesterday Mr Bartlett advised Mr Underwood to invite the Liberals to govern because they polled more of the statewide vote.

Both leaders met the Governor again this afternoon.

After the meeting, Liberal leader Will Hodgman addressed a media conference and accused Labor of acting dishonourably.

Mr Hodgman said Mr Bartlett had broken his promise to the Tasmanian people.

He said the decision meant Tasmanians would have a Labor-Green Government with a lust for power.

Mr Hodgman said the Liberals would move a motion of no-confidence in Labor on the floor of the house.

Meanwhile Greens leader Nick McKim said the Governor had chosen the most stable option.

“I was really encouraged to hear David talking tonight about trust and the need to build trust because ultimately he’s right,” Mr McKim said.

“What the Tasmanian people have voted for is a parliament where no one party has the majority and it’s incumbent on all of us now to work as best we can constructively and co-operatively.”

Tasmanians elected a hung parliament last month with Labor and the Liberals gaining 10 seats each and the Greens five.

The Governor’s decision came after a day of drama that involved the Greens pledging their support for the incumbent Labor Government in minority.

Earlier, Mr McKim said if neither major party signed a written power-sharing deal, the Greens would support Labor.

Mr Hodgman did not comment on the Greens’ pledge but a media adviser said the party would not do deals and would not be blackmailed into negotiating.

Brown could continue as British PM for weeks even if he loses elections

London, Mar. 31 (ANI): Under new Whitehall proposals, Gordon Brown may continue as the British Prime Minister for weeks even if he loses the general elections.

In order to prevent any immediate second election in the event of a hung parliament, British Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O’Donnell and his associates are formulating a plan which could be agreeable to both Labour and the Tories.

The Telegraph quoted Sir Gus as telling a Commons committee that it would be up to Brown to decide when to resign even if the Conservatives were the biggest party in a hung parliament.

Civil servants have admitted that the need for stability is so great in the current economic crisis that Brown might have to remain in Number 10 for weeks in case of a hung parliament.

They point out that the Queen has the power to block an immediate second election if she believed it would be “detrimental to the national economy”.

Brown has already indicated his desire to carry on as Labour leader even if he was defeated, and if he could form a Commons majority in a deal with the Liberal Democrats, he would remain at the Downing Street for the next term, the paper said.

According to Sir Gus’ proposals, there would be a curb on what powers Brown could exercise until a settled government was formed.

However, if Brown fails to “command the confidence of the Commons” then David Cameron would be asked if he could secure a deal with minority parties to get his plans through, the paper added.

This process could take weeks so the new rules aim to hasten agreement between possible coalition partners. (ANI)

Treasurer denies Labor split on minority govt

The Tasmanian Treasurer has denied any split in the Labor Party over whether to retain or give up Government.

Labor and the Liberals appear likely to have 10 seats each in the new hung parliament but two seats are still undecided.

Premier David Bartlett has pledged to let the Liberals govern in minority if they win more seats than Labor, or more votes if the seats are tied.

It is understood some Labor MPs are now questioning that promise but Treasurer Michael Aird says he is not one of them.

He says the promise has unanimous support.

“David Bartlett has declared the Labor Party position,” he said.

“No-one is arguing with that position, everyone understood.”

“The electorate understood that and that’s the commitment he made to the Tasmanian people.”

No deals

The Liberals have again ruled out negotiating or compromising any policies if they govern in minority.

When asked which Greens’ policies his party could negotiate over, Deputy Liberal leader Jeremy Rockliff again said there would be no deals.

“We did achieve more votes than any other party, the Greens and Labor obviously, so we would be given an opportunity to see that our agenda was implemented,” he said.

“Now that’s a very clear statement of position and that’s what we’ll hang onto.”

Mr Aird says he has no problems giving up Government if the Labor Party wins fewer seats.

“We are not going to go into Government with less seats than the Liberals,” he said.

“The electorate has said their preferred party was the party with the most seats, you’ve got to respect that.

“If we didn’t, we’d be flying in the face of what the electorate has stated.”

Monarchists say Governor entitled to use powers

Monarchists have weighed into the debate about the formation of Tasmania’s new government under a hung parliament.

The major parties are expected to hold 10 seats each in the House of Assembly and the Greens five when the final election results are known next week.

Constitutional law expert Michael Stokes has said the Governor should let the Parliament test any governing arrangements and not seek formal accords between any parties.

But the Convenor of Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy, David Flint, says the Governor can use his reserve powers.

“In exercising those, he is entitled to find out what he feels he needs to find out and to seek assurances,” he said.

“I think it’s perfectly proper for a Governor, once he finds he has no Premier, to find out himself where the support lays before he makes a choice as to whom he should commission as Premier.”

Darling hits the rich, sets UK election stage

The British government has set the stage for a looming election with a budget promising a 2.5 billion pound ($4 billion) package to boost growth, higher taxes for the rich and lower borrowing than predicted just three months ago.

Given a record deficit that has spooked markets and threatened the country’s debt rating, big giveaways were off the agenda.

But finance minister Alistair Darling still found some concessions, including cutting house purchase duty for first-time buyers.

Mr Darling laid claim to an economic recovery that he says his Conservative opponents would crush.

“The recovery has begun. Unemployment is falling and borrowing is better than expected,” he told parliament.

“The choice before the country now is whether to support those whose policies will suffocate our recovery.”

After 13 years out of power, the Conservatives remain ahead in opinion polls but their lead has shrunk markedly in recent weeks.

Most polls now point to a hung parliament, a nightmare scenario for markets which fear it could leave a minority government without the clout to make the unpopular spending cuts needed to bring down record public debt.

Labour says it will halve the deficit in four years, but fiscal tightening will only start next year as the recovery remains too fragile.

But opposition leader David Cameron says that is too late. He says he would act this year.

“They are just going to carry on spending, carry on borrowing and carry on failing,” he said.

“The biggest risk to our recovery is five more years of this prime minister.

“We need a credible plan to deal with Britain’s record debts, starting now.”

Targeting the rich

As well as moving to lower borrowing, Mr Darling also found some measures to target the better off.

The move is likely to play well with Labour’s core vote in the run-up to an expected May 6 election.

Mr Darling says he will scrap duty on house purchases of less than 250,000 pounds ($408,000) for first-time buyers but pay for that with a 1 percentage point rise in duty to 5 per cent for houses worth more than 1 million pounds ($1.6 million).

“Those who have benefited the most from the strong growth in incomes in past years should now pay their fair share of tax,” he said.

Lower debt

Mr Darling says he was able to revise down his forecasts for the budget deficit in the current and next fiscal year.

In 2010/11, borrowing is expected to come in at 163 billion pounds ($267 billion), 13 billion pounds ($21 billion) lower than previously forecast.

Future years have also been revised down.

Downward revisions to borrowing had been widely expected by analysts.

Not only has unemployment in Britain risen less steeply than expected, equity and oil prices have rebounded faster, meaning government spending has been slightly lower and revenues higher than previously feared.

-Reuters

Frome candidates battle to the end

Neither of the leading candidates in the South Australian mid-north electorate of Frome is giving up hope of clinching the seat.

That is despite a swing of about 12 per cent towards the independent candidate Geoff Brock.

Liberal candidate Terry Boylan has refused to concede defeat, saying postal and pre-poll votes could get him over the line.

Mr Brock agrees, but says the swing towards him has given him confidence.

“I suppose the people from the outer areas would know Geoff Brock a little bit better than they did at the by-election,” he said.

“I have gone out there into the region to try and get a better understanding of the electorate out there and the people and the issues and I think they appreciate that.”

Mr Brock says he is relieved that there is a diminishing prospect of a hung parliament.

“That was a very daunting subject having been there 12 months, basically five minutes of my life, and for somebody to say you could hold the balance of power so, look, if that opportunity had have arisen I would have been doing the best I can for the electorate of Frome, but certainly it is a load off my mind,” he said.

Stuart

Meanwhile, the only other seat in the state’s north and west yet to be claimed is the seat of Stuart.

It was held by retiring Liberal Member Graham Gunn by only 233 votes.

The Liberal candidate, Dan van Holst Pellekaan, is still yet to claim victory, despite gaining a nearly 7 per cent swing.

“You know nothing is official until the returning officer tells you that he has decided you’ve won but I’m quite comfortable that’s what’s going to happen … in terms of the figures that are outstanding and the figures that we’ve got at the moment, look I think we’re looking very comfortable for a win in Stuart,” he said.

SA politics remain in limbo

South Australian politics remains in limbo with neither the Government nor Opposition declaring victory after yesterday’s election.

According to the ABC’s election computer, Labor has 25 seats in the 47-seat House of Assembly, the Liberals have 18 and there will be four independents.

Labor looks like it will retain government, but has suffered a backlash in a number of safe electorates with a swing against the party of more than 7 per cent.

The Liberals say they still have a chance to claim two Labor seats – Bright and Hartley.

The main candidates in those seats will wait for the results of postal votes.

Electoral commissioner Kay Mousley says it will be a close race

“As I’ve predicted it will take some time for some seats to be fully determined and we might not know until Sunday of next week,” she said.

While a hung parliament is still a possibility, the fallout from what looks set to be a slim Labor Party victory is starting to be felt.

Environment Minister Jay Weatherill has announced his intention to challenge for the deputy leadership against Kevin Foley.

Attorney-General Michael Atkinson has already said he will resign from Cabinet to help renew the party.

Too close to call

Premier Mike Rann and Liberal leader Isobel Redmond both said the result was too close to call last night.

Mr Rann entered the election with a 10-seat majority, but a campaign dogged by the Michelle Chantelois scandal had political pundits predicting a hung parliament.

Early results showed big swings towards the Liberals, but as the evening progressed the swing against Labor decreased.

Mr Rann told supporters in Adelaide that he was cautiously optimistic that Labor would secure a third term.

“If over the next few days I get the opportunity to say that we have won, this election it will be – given all that has happened and all that has been thrown at us – the sweetest victory of all,” he told the party faithful at Labor headquarters.

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond refused to concede defeat, saying she would wait for more votes to be counted.

She thanked Liberal supporters for delivering the party the scalps of two Labor Cabinet members – Nationals MP Karlene Maywald, who held water portfolios for Labor, and Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith in the seat of Adelaide, where there was a swing of almost 15 per cent to the Liberals.

“I believe that the swings we’ve seen like the swing in Adelaide and across a lot of the very strong Labor-held seats, we have seen swings because Labor has stopped listening,” Ms Redmond said.

“We were listening and we were taking notice of what the people wanted.”

Rann, Labor on cusp of third term in SA

South Australian Premier Mike Rann is in a strong position to deliver the Labor Party a third term in government despite a voter backlash.

Mr Rann and Liberal leader Isobel Redmond both said the result was too close to call on the night.

But Mr Rann is the frontrunner with the ABC’s election computer predicting Labor is set to hold 25 seats in the 47-seat House of Assembly. The Liberals are forecast to hold 18, with four Independents.

Labor faces a tougher task in Tasmania, with a hung parliament the likely result.

Mr Rann entered the election with a 10-seat majority, but a campaign dogged by the Michelle Chantelois scandal had political pundits predicting a hung parliament.

Early results showed big swings towards the Liberals, but as the evening progressed the swing against Labor decreased.

Mr Rann told supporters in Adelaide that he was cautiously optimistic that Labor would secure a third term.

“If over the next few days I get the opportunity to say that we have won, this election it will be – given all that has happened and all that has been thrown at us – the sweetest victory of all,” he told the party faithful at Labor headquarters.

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond refused to concede defeat, saying she would wait for more votes to be counted.

She thanked Liberal supporters for delivering the party the scalps of two Labor cabinet members – Nationals MP Karlene Maywald, who held water portfolios for Labor, and Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith in the seat of Adelaide, where there was a swing of almost 15 per cent to the Liberals.

“I believe that the swings we’ve seen like the swing in Adelaide and across a lot of the very strong Labor-held seats, we have seen swings because Labor has stopped listening,” Ms Redmond said.

“We were listening and we were taking notice of what the people wanted.”

Changing seats

The Liberals achieved a statewide swing of about 7 per cent, but the biggest swings away from the Government were in very safe Labor seats and in some of the safest Liberal electorates.

A 19 per cent swing away from Ms Maywald in the Riverland-based seat of Chaffey has Liberal Tim Whetstone set to take over as the new member.

Ms Maywald had held the seat since 1997, but low water allocations for irrigators and ongoing drought produced a backlash.

Mr Whetstone says irrigators and businesses are hurting and looking for a change.

“Karlene has aligned herself with the Rann Government and I think that is her downfall,” he said.

“The Rann Government has absolutely shown no consideration, given very little support to the seat of Chaffey and along the way we don’t see the Premier come up here and listen to what is going on, to see what’s going on.”

Liberal candidate Steven Marshall tipped Labor’s Vini Ciccarello out of suburban Norwood after she held the seat for more than a decade.

Her 4 per cent margin fell to a 9 per cent Liberal swing.

Mr Marshall said voters in Norwood were disillusioned with Labor’s spin and lack of substance.

He said Labor had been given a hit over issues such as Glenside Hospital’s redevelopment.

Labor’s Lindsay Simmons was dumped from Morialta by Liberal candidate John Gardener.

Crucial seats

Labor incumbent Chloe Fox and Liberal challenger Maria Kourtesis are fighting over a handful of votes to decide the south-west Adelaide seat of Bright.

Postal votes will be crucial and Ms Kourtesis expects they will favour her.

“They do favour us a little bit and we’re looking forward to having them in, but there could be a lot out there so it could be an unknown. We don’t know,” she said.

Ms Redmond said the undecided seats and the big number of postal votes meant the election outcome was far from settled.

“Now we reckon we’re a real possibility in the seat of Bright and we’ve still got to count all of those postals and pre-polls, so we are extremely hopeful about that seat,” she said.

Labor is also in danger of Hartley sliding to Liberal Joe Scalzi, who has held the seat in the past.

In Mitchell, Independent Kris Hanna is hoping he can stay above third place in the count to see preference flows lift him to another narrow win.

Another Independent – Geoff Brock in Frome – achieved a big swing towards him, but says it is still too early to claim victory.

“I’m very privileged to have such a big swing in my favour but there’s still the postal votes and also the pre-polls still to count,” he said.

The ABC election computer predicted Dignity For Disability candidate Kelly Vincent would join the Legislative Council, as would Tammy Jennings for the Greens.

Liberal Jing Lee is also expected to gain a seat in the Upper House.

Political dealing to begin in Tasmania

Tasmania faces days, perhaps weeks, of political machinations after the election left the state facing a hung parliament.

The ABC’s election computer is predicting the Labor and Liberal parties will each win 10 seats, with the Greens taking five.

Liberal leader Will Hodgman has already indicated that he believes his party should be given the chance to form government.

In the lead-up to the poll, Premier David Bartlett ruled out entering into a power-sharing deal with the Greens.

Mr Bartlett said the party that won the most seats should be given the opportunity to govern.

Should two parties win the same number of seats, as seems likely, Mr Bartlett said the party with the greatest proportion of votes should be given that chance – even if it meant minority government.

On election night, Mr Hodgman told a packed tally room he expects to be given that chance.

Mr Hodgman said his party looked like capturing the highest percentage of the primary vote.

“[It is] the Liberal Party that has won the most votes right across Tasmania,” he said.

“Tasmanians have sent a very clear message tonight and it is one for change.

“It is one for a brighter, positive future. I will ensure that we will work constructively, positively and with their interests at our heart.”

Mr Bartlett was less forthcoming in his speech, instead thanking his supporters and talking up his government’s record.

He congratulated Mr Hodgman and Greens Leader Nick McKim and praised their campaigns.

He accepted responsibility for Labor’s performance.

“The electorate has sent Labor a message,” he said.

Greens

Mr McKim told the tally room a hung Parliament was an opportunity for a new era of cooperative politics in Tasmania.

He described it as a historic result for his party and the Greens’ best ever election achievement in any Australian state or territory.

“What an opportunity this is for Tasmania. What an opportunity for a new era of constructive, cooperative politics, for politicians to work together, not to advance their own interests or their party’s, but to advance Tasmania,” he said.

“The Tasmanian people have moved past that tired old view.”

He described the situation as a chance to disprove the notion that majority government was always good and minority government always bad.

He also borrowed and adapted the “true believers” phrase from the lexicon of former prime minister Paul Keating, saying: “This is a result for the new believers.”

Results

Labor went into the poll holding 14 seats, the Liberals seven and the Greens four.

Labor has lost four of its seats and has suffered a swing against it of about 12 per cent.

With more than 84 per cent of the vote counted, Labor had secured 37 per cent of the vote to the Liberal Party’s 39 per cent.

The Greens won 21 per cent of the vote – the party’s best result on record – eclipsing the 18 per cent it won in 2002.

Mr Hodgman topped the poll in Franklin and has the highest vote in the state.

Mr McKim also won a quota in Franklin while Mr Bartlett had the highest vote in his electorate of Denison.

The undecided seats are in Denison in the south and Braddon, in the north-west.

In Denison, it is a contest between the Greens’ Helen Burnett, Liberal Richard Lowrie and the Independent outsider Andrew Wilkie.

With 84 per cent of the primary vote counted, Mr Bartlett and Scott Bacon, Liberal Matthew Groom and the Greens’ Cassy O’Connor have all been elected.

The last seat in Braddon will be won by either the incumbent Liberal MP Brett Whiteley or the Greens’ Paul O’Halloran.

Labor’s Bryan Green and Brenton Best have been returned, along with the Liberal deputy leader Jeremy Rockliff and Adam Brooks.

Electoral system

Tasmania uses the Hare-Clark system of proportional representation in its lower house.

This system has only five electorates and five MPs are elected from each electorate to make up the 25-seat parliament.

This means candidates compete not only against those from other parties but also against colleagues from their own parties.

To be guaranteed a seat in parliament, candidates must win a “quota” – a great enough proportion of the vote to win a place.

If fewer than five candidates win a quota – which is invariably the case – the other positions in parliament are decided by the distribution of preferences.

As a result, it can take days or weeks for the final outcome to emerge.

Odds on for hung Parliament in Tasmania

latest seat predictions saying 10 Labor, 10 Liberal and five to the Greens.

With almost 80 per cent of the vote counted, the swing against David Bartlett’s Labor Government is about 12 per cent.

Liberal Party health spokesman Brett Whiteley is likely to lose his seat in Braddon.

He has just over half a quota.

Fellow Liberal candidate Adam Brooks leads him by almost 1,500 primary votes.

In Bass in the north, former federal Liberal MP Michael Ferguson has topped the vote count ahead of Labor’s Michelle O’Byrne and sitting Liberal Peter Gutwein.

The Greens’ Kim Booth has been elected, while Labor’s second seat looks like going to Brian Wightman.

Mr Booth says the results reflect the community’s desire for change.

“The community has spoken and voted with their feet,” he said.

“They clearly want to see a very strong Green presence in Parliament which is reflected across the state, particularly in Bass.

“They’re looking for a co-operative model of politics and people who represent the community, rather than just the big end of town.”

In Lyons, the major parties look like winning two seats each with the Greens retaining one.

Veteran Labor Member Michael Polley has been elected for the 12th straight time.

He says the voting trends highlight a need for parliamentary change.

“I think that in the future, we’ll have to see how a government can be formed over the 10 seats,” he said.

“It may well be, as we heard the former premier and my good friend Paul [Lennon] say, I think parliamentary reform is back on the agenda.”

ALP backbencher Heather Butler has lost her seat to the Liberals, while Labor’s young candidate Rebecca White is ahead of long-standing MP David Llewellyn.

She says it is unexpected.

“We’ve been campaigning really hard and getting out amongst the community and I was hoping for possibly 3,000 primary votes.

“I thought that would be a strong showing for a first campaign. To see what has been achieved tonight is extraordinary.”

In Denison, 75 per cent of the votes in have been counted.

The Greens’ Cassy O’Connor has outpolled Premier David Bartlett.

Scott Bacon, the son of the former premier Jim Bacon, has been elected at the expense of Bartlett Government Ministers Lisa Singh and Graeme Sturges.

The fifth seat will be decided by preferences.

Franklin continues to be the electorate where the swing against Labor is the greatest, at 15 per cent.

The Liberals have increased their vote by 9 per cent and the Greens, 7 per cent.

Sitting Labor Member Daniel Hulme has conceded he has lost his seat.

Liberal Leader Will Hodgman has two quotas, Greens’ Leader Nick McKim has one and a half with Labor’s Lara Giddings on almost one quota.

Also polling well are Labor’s David O’Byrne and the Liberals’ Jaquie Petrusma.

Hung parliament tipped as counting starts in Tas

Counting is underway in Tasmania amid Newspoll predictions of a hung parliament.

The Greens look set to hold the balance of power in the state with neither of the major parties in a position to rule in its own right.

But both Premier David Bartlett and Liberal Leader Will Hodgman have said they will not cut a deal with the Greens.

Mr Bartlett says he will stand aside as Premier if Labor and the Liberals win the same number of seats, but the Liberals secure more of the popular vote than his party.

Despite the polling Mr Bartlett remained upbeat as he cast his vote this morning at a Hobart primary school in the southern Tasmanian seat of Denison.

“I’m a born optimist and I believe that when Tasmanians get into the ballot box today they will be thinking very carefully about setting the priority for the next four years,” he said.

Some opinion polls have indicated many Tasmanians still have not decided how they will vote.

The latest Newspoll shows a hung parliament is the most likely outcome, with Labor and the Liberals taking 10 seats each and the Greens holding the balance of power with five.

Mr Hodgman cast his ballot paper at a community hall in Margate in the southern electorate of Franklin.

He says he is satisfied with the way the Liberals have run their pitch for government, and is happy with his party’s decision to steer clear of negative campaigning.

McKim pleased

Greens leader Nick McKim, whose Newspoll satisfaction rating of 58 per cent is higher than the Liberal Leader and the Premier, has reiterated his pledge to work with either party in the event of a minority government.

“We’ve had a very good response on the ground and on the street in this campaign,” he said.

“Ultimately I think that’s because Green values are mainstream values and they see us as a safe pair of hands for Tasmania’s future.”

Mr Hodgman praised the performance of his team during Tasmania’s five-week election campaign, saying his campaign team has been cohesive and disciplined.

“I’d happily go round again but I wouldn’t change a thing. We’ve been positive, we’ve been constructive, our team of candidates have been fantastic,” he said.

Mr Bartlett says gets the feeling the momentum has picked up for Labor. “Look I’m pleased. I’ve really enjoyed the campaign I’ve got to say,” he said.

“There’s nothing more invigorating for me personally than being out and about and talking to the people of Tasmania and hearing directly from them what’s going on in their lives, I’ve really enjoyed that.”

Major parties rattled: Greens

The Greens say a warning by four ex-Tasmanian Premiers about the dangers of a minority government shows the major parties are rattled by growing support for the Greens.

Former Labor Premiers, Paul Lennon and Michael Field joined with former Liberal Premiers, Robin Gray and Tony Rundle to issue a joint statement.

They warned investors would be wary of doing business in Tasmania if the Greens held the balance of power.

But Greens Senator Bob Brown says Tasmanian voters would be better off listening to the three tenors, than the four ex-Premiers.

“The four ex-premiers aren’t the three tenors, they’re right out of tune with the Tasmanian electorate,” he said.

Senator Brown says they are ex-premiers for a reason and their warning will not hold any sway with voters.

“We’ve got Robin Gray who ran the state into $100 million debt,” he said.

“Michael Field who wanted to close 22 schools, the Greens stopped that.

“Tony Rundle who wanted to sell off the hydro and then Paul Lennon who ran arguably the most unpopular government in recent times.”

But Tasmania’s current Premier, David Bartlett says he agrees with the four former Premiers that hung Parliaments have been bad for the state.

“The last hung parliament, of course saw people leaving the place in droves and saw an unemployment rate four percentage points worse than the national average,” he said.

“Having said that State Labor is running for majority government, we always have been and we always will.”

Past may catch up with crooks under Rann plan

South Australian Premier Mike Rann says a returned Labor government will allow the criminal past of some defendants to be presented as evidence during court proceedings.

Mr Rann says he will amend the state’s Evidence Act to allow juries to hear past histories of offenders in cases that involve violent crime or sex offences.

Labor’s proposed changes are part of its serious crime policy.

The state election on March 20 is turning into a tight contest, with some analysts predicting a hung parliament.

Mr Rann makes no apologies for wanting to change a fundamental tenet of the court process.

“In terms of juries, everyone gets really annoyed when we find out that juries and courts have not been given the past history of serious criminals,” he said.

“It is about really seeing a pattern of behaviour that we want – serious criminals like those who are violent or child offenders – the courts to know of their previous behaviour.

“I think the community is rightly outraged when in some cases an offender’s criminal past comes to light the day after a conviction or, even worse, the day after an acquittal.”

The South Australian Liberal Party was not available for comment on the proposal.

The state’s Commissioner for Victims Rights, Michael O’Connell, says victims are generally supportive of the idea to allow some criminal history to be presented at trial.

He says the proposal would restore some balance to court proceedings.

“Victims are often stunned and sometimes angry when they find out that the jury or the court are not going to be told about the accused person’s criminal history,” he said.

“Often the facts of a case are sanitised, coming as a result of an agreement that has been struck between the prosecution and the defence with little meaningful consultation with victims.

“Therefore the victims feel the jury is not getting to hear the whole truth and their verdict may be tainted.”

‘Dangerous’ reform

But civil libertarians say the Government’s proposal will undermine the justice system.

Chairman of the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee, George Mancini, says the changes go too far.

“People do change, or people have been in circumstances in which their past is no longer of any relevance or use in deciding what they have done today,” he said.

“I think it is a very potentially dangerous reform. The risk is that all you are doing is creating prejudice in the minds of people that if they have done it once, they will do it again.”

With less than a fortnight to go to the state poll, this is the first time law and order has been featured in the campaign.

The Government’s central theme has so far been job creation.

It is a change of tack for Labor, with the party now trying to wedge Liberal Leader Isobel Redmond who is a former lawyer and legal traditionalist.

Onus on President Patil to exercise political neutrality post polls

New Delhi, May 15 (ANI): With the political pendulum swinging from one coalition to the next given the expected fractured verdict in the 2009 general elections, the onus will be on President Pratibha Devisingh Patil to exercise neutrality in government selection.

As a hung Parliament is widely expected, Patil will have three options:

(1) Invite the single largest party

(2) Invite the single largest pre-poll alliance

(3) Invite the largest post-poll formation with letters of support

According to sources in Rashtrapati Bhavan, Patil is being briefed about what her predecessors in office did in similar situations.

In 1989, President R. Venkatraman invited the single largest party, the Congress, which declined. VP Singh then formed the National Front government with support from the Left and the BJP.

Again in 1996, President Shankar Dayal Sharma invited the single largest party, the BJP, the government lasted a mere 13 days.

However, the most pertinent precedent was in 1998 when President K R Narayanan insisted Vajpayee produce letters of support before appointing him Prime minister.

Which is why the BJP’s stand this week is so important. They want President Patil to invite the single largest pre-poll formation first.

“The president must call the single largest poll formation and the single largest party,” said BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad at a press conference.

Not wanting to be out maneouvered by the BJP’s stand, the Congress is focusing on getting letters of support, rather than wait and see who the President invites first.

“We leave it to the President,” said Congress leader Kapil Sibal.

Who the President invites first to form the government is critical. Will it be the single largest party? In which case smaller parties could gravitate towards it. Or will she invite the largest alliance?

Constitutional experts say it will be President Patil’s discretion, but the prime minister must convince her that he will be able to win a vote of confidence.(ANI)