Leaders arrive in US for landmark nuke summit

World leaders have begun arriving in Washington for an unprecedented summit to secure nuclear stockpiles and keep weapons material out of the hands of terrorists.

The White House says US president Barack Obama has called the 47-nation conference to tackle what it describes as the most dangerous threat to the world – nuclear security.

A massive security blanket has been thrown over a large part of Washington for the biggest gathering of world leaders on US soil since the end of World War II.

Mr Obama wants the assembled presidents and prime ministers to agree to secure all nuclear materials within four years and is also likely to call for tougher prosecutions of traffickers in weapons grade materials.

“We know that organisations like Al Qaeda are in the process of trying to secure nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, and would have no compunction at using them,” Mr Obama said.

The president will also have a series of meetings on the sidelines of the summit, aimed in part at trying to win support for new sanctions against Iran.

US secretary of state Hillary Clinton says the fear of a nuclear war between superpowers has waned, but has been replaced by the threat of nuclear-armed terrorists.

“We know that terrorist groups, primarily Al Qaeda, persist in their efforts to obtain enough nuclear material to try to do something that would cause such mass havoc and terror and damage and destruction, that it would be devastating,” she said.

The summit comes a week after the US signed a new arms control treaty with Russia and unveiled a new policy about the use of nuclear weapons.

But this meeting will focus on separated plutonium and highly enriched uranium.

“There’s a lot of nuclear material that is not as secure, that hasn’t been destroyed,” Senator Clinton said.

“It isn’t under lock and key in many places in the world. Particularly in the former Soviet Union, but not exclusively there.”

Joseph Cirincione, the president of the Ploughshares Fund – an American foundation focused on nuclear weapons policy and conflict resolution – says Mr Obama will have his work cut out for him.

“India and Pakistan don’t really agree that the number one task is to secure their nuclear materials,” he said.

“They’re part of the crowd you want to convince.”

Although the summit does not officially start until tomorrow, Mr Obama has already begun a series of one-on-one meetings with several leaders, including those of India and Pakistan.

He is also hoping to use a meeting tomorrow with China’s president Hu Jintao to win support for new sanctions against Iran.

Meanwhile, US defence secretary Robert Gates says Iran is not a nuclear-capable country at the moment, nor does he think it inevitable that Iran will become one.

“We have not … drawn that conclusion at all. And in fact, we’re doing everything we can to try and keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons,” he said.

Some world leaders will not be at the summit, including Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is sending his deputy instead.

Senator Clinton denies that is a snub, saying a number of nations are not sending their heads of government.

“Gordon Brown is not coming from Great Britain, Kevin Rudd is not coming from Australia, King Abdullah is not coming from Saudi Arabia,” she said.

Defence Minister John Faulkner will represent Australia.

India a partner in Obama’s N-efforts?

IF US President Barack Obama is serious about reducing nuclear weapons, putting in place a global nuclear test ban and ending the production of fissile material to produce more nuclear weapons, then India will necessarily be in the frontline of such efforts. Speaking in Prague, Obama said, ” and #8230;I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons and #8230;” “To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy and #8230; we will negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with the Russians this year.

” The US President also said his administration would “immediately and aggressively” pursue the ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was rejected by the US Senate in 1999. India, which has still to sign and ratify the CTBT, having acquired de facto nuclear weapon status in 1998, would have little choice but to sign the Treaty if the Senate ratifies it.

“I don’t see why today’s India should object to signing the Treaty if the US and China ratify it,” Arundhati Ghose, former Indian ambassador and arms control expert, told HT. Ghose, however, was skeptical about Obama’s efforts to reduce global nuclear weapons. “I think he’s forgotten that the (presidential) campaign is over.

He is President of the US, which is in dire straits,” she argued. Another key area of interest is a new treaty to end the production of fissile material.

“If we are serious about stopping the spread of these weapons, then we should put an end to the dedicated production of weapons-grade materials that create them,” Obama said. “The basic bargain is sound: Countries with nuclear weapons will move towards disarmament, countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them, and all countries can access peaceful nuclear energy.

,” he underlined. Radha Kumar, trustee at the Delhi Policy Group, said the world would have to deal with the issue of unequal levels of fissile material in the possession of nuclear weapon states.

On CTBT, Kumar said: “The logic is there for India to sign CTBT. But it remains to be seen what government takes power in Delhi.”.