Russian gays elude police for first calm protest

Gay and lesbian activists eluded Russian security services in a five-hour game of cat and mouse on Saturday to hold the first gay protest in Moscow not to be broken up by riot police.

After luring hundreds of riot police and undercover officers to a different location, a group of about 25 gay and lesbian activists unfurled a rainbow banner on Moscow’s main Leningradsky Avenue, chanting “homophobia is Russia’s disgrace”.

They said the subterfuge was needed to avoid a repeat of the violence seen in previous years when Moscow police, nationalists and ultra-Orthodox believers broke up similar protests.

“It is very difficult to be openly gay in Russia: you can face serious problems at work and discrimination is very widespread,” said Nikolai Bayev, a gay activist at the protest.

“Russia is where most Western countries were in the 1970s when it comes to gay rights … We are only just starting to really come out,” he said.

Police arrived soon after the brief protest, which the city of Moscow had refused to permit, but the activists scattered.

Homosexuality could be punished with jail terms in the Soviet Union and though Russia decriminalised homosexuality in 1993, intolerance remains very widespread. Polls have shown more than 80 percent of Russians see homosexuality as immoral.

Mayor Yuri Luzhkov has said gay protests are satanic and previous attempts to hold such events have ended in multiple arrests and clashes with ultra-Orthodox believers who say gays should be punished or treated in hospital for their “illness”.

Just days before last year’s Eurovision Song Contest in Moscow, police arrested at least 40 gay and lesbian activists at a similar protest.

Gay activists had asked Western embassies to host the protest but they said their proposal was either ignored or turned down by envoys from the United States, Canada and major European Union states.

“The EU and Western embassies are hypocrites,” said British gay rights activist Peter Tatchell, who travelled to Moscow to join the protest.

“We are being hounded and hunted by the police and the FSB Security Service all because we want to hold a peaceful gay rights protest.”

The Moscow police declined to comment. A spokesman for the FSB, the main successor to the Soviet-era KGB, also declined comment and asked for questions in writing which he said would not be answered before Monday.

(Editing by Alison Williams)

Indian IVF bill may stop gay couple surrogacy

New Delhi, Apr.26 (ANI): A growing number of male couples from Australia and other Western countries are hiring surrogates in India to bear children, but that might no longer be possible if a draft bill to regulate IVF in India becomes law.

R.S. Sharma, the secretary of the committee writing a bill to govern assisted reproductive technology (ART), told the Sydney Morning Herald that unless gay and lesbian relationships are legalised in India, gay couples would be excluded from hiring surrogates.

Delhi”s High Court recently overturned a 150-year-old section of the country”s penal code that outlawed ””carnal intercourse against the order of nature””.

However, gay activists warn this ruling, which in effect decriminalised sodomy, does not legalise gay relationships, leaving the status of such relationships unclear.

“If our government does not permit gay relationships, then it certainly will not be permitted for foreign gay couples to come to this country and have a [surrogacy] agreement,” said Dr Sharma, who is the deputy director-general of the reproductive health and nutrition division at the India Council of Medical Research.

The paper quoted Allen-Drury, a resident of Australia’s Blue Mountains area, as saying that changes to India”s laws would be a great disappointment, if passed.

The draft bill could make it difficult for all Australian couples to use Indian surrogates.

One stumbling block would be a requirement that foreign countries guarantee they will accept the surrogate child as a citizen – before a surrogacy could begin.

Dr Sharma said foreign couples would have to obtain a document from their embassy or foreign ministry pledging the surrogate child citizenship of their country. “Only then will they be entitled to sign an agreement with a surrogate or an ART clinic,” he said.

””Under the Australian Citizenship Act, there are no guarantees,”” a spokesman for the Department of Immigration and Citizenship said on Friday. (ANI)

Vatican distances itself from prelate’s gay remarks

The Vatican has distanced itself from remarks by a top prelate who stirred anger in the gay community by blaming homosexual priests for the child sex abuse scandals rocking the Catholic Church.

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone says it is homosexuality, not celibacy, that is to blame for the child abuse in the Church.

“Many psychologists and psychiatrists have shown that there is no link between celibacy and paedophilia, but many others have shown, and I’ve been told recently, that there is a relationship between homosexuality and paedophilia,” he said.

“That is the truth. I read it in a document written by psychologists, so that is the problem.”

Cardinal Bertone continued, telling reporters that child sex abuse was widespread in society. But this did not excuse it in the Church, he said.

“Keep in mind the most important thing is that this pathological illness is a pathological illness that can affect all types of people, with a smaller percentage amongst priests,” he said.

“However, the behaviour of these priests in this respect is very negative behaviour, very serious and shocking.”

The Vatican later distanced itself from the remarks, saying “psychological or medical” assertions are not in the remit of Church officials.

“Church authorities do not deem it part of their responsibility to make general assertions of a specifically psychological or medical nature,” the Vatican said in a statement.

But Cardinal Bertone’s comments have brought condemnation from gay activists, doctors and politicians.

Rolando Jimenez, the president of the Movement for the Integration and Freedom of Homosexuals, says Cardinal Bertone has tried to shift the blame for child sex in the Church to gay priests.

“In much the same way as the Catholic Church had to apologise for the crimes of the Inquisition, or present their apologies – mild, but apologies nonetheless – for their role in the Jewish Holocaust, I have no doubt that in the medium or long term the Catholic Church hierarchy will at some point have to apologise for this perversion, for the sinister attitude of this Vatican gentleman,” he said.

“We believe that there is no element, we are certain that there is no relationship between paedophilia and homosexuality.”

Doctors have also disputed the link, and so has a Chilean senator who has helped draft child protection laws.

In a report by the AFP news service, Senator Patricio Walker says: “I would like to see the scientific studies he said he has because I don’t share his evaluation.”

Senator Walker says he has the impression that Cardinal Bertone is wrong on that point.

The Vatican’s secretary of state is not the only one whose comments have not helped defuse the child sex scandals.

The Pope’s personal preacher recently likened accusations against the pontiff to collective violence against Jews.

Father Raniero Cantalamessa spoke in a Good Friday sermon at St Peter’s Basilica. The Pope was watching on.

Jewish leaders as well as some senior members of the Catholic Church found Father Cantalamessa’s comment insulting.

Containment

Senior figures in the Catholic Church have been trying to contain the child sex scandals, some of the worst to hit the Church in years.

There have been claims of child sex abuse by priests in Austria, Germany, Ireland and the United States, as well as in Australia.

The Vatican has dismissed reports of a church cover-up as exaggerations. Some victims hold the Pope himself responsible.

Pope Benedict has faced claims that he failed to take action against priests who were preying on children.

Before heading the Church he was a top morals enforcer and earlier the archbishop of Munich. Cardinal Bertone has defended Pope Benedict’s handling of the child sex claims.

“The Pope is willing to find the victims. We don’t want to silence this issue but we want this campaign to end,” he said.

Pentagon makes it harder to expel gays in military

The Pentagon issued new rules on Thursday making it harder for the U.S. military to discharge gay personnel, an interim step to ease enforcement of the existing “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy while Congress considers repealing it.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the directives were the result of a 45-day review of what the Pentagon can do in the short term within the confines of existing law to allow implementation in a “fair and more appropriate manner.”

He said the goal was to bring “a greater measure of common sense and common decency” to the process while the Pentagon conducts a broader review slated for completion by Dec. 1.

Proponents of repeal hailed what they called the first cracks in “don’t ask, don’t tell” since the policy became law in 1993. Opponents said the new rules would invite open defiance of the law and undercut troop morale.

President Barack Obama called for the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” in his State of the Union speech in January, putting a spotlight on the hot-button issue before congressional elections in November.

Many gay activists were frustrated last year that Obama, whom they strongly backed in the 2008 campaign, had not moved quickly to carry out a promise to overturn the policy, which bars homosexuals from serving openly in the military.

The directives from Gates raised the rank of those allowed to launch investigations against suspected violators of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” They also raised the level for what constitutes “credible” information to start an inquiry and curbed the use of testimony from doctors, lawyers and clergy.

To limit expulsions of soldiers “outed” by third parties, the directives require their information be given under oath. The use of “overheard statements and hearsay” in “don’t ask, don’t tell” cases will also be discouraged.

Gates said the changes would take effect immediately and apply to all open and future cases.

‘A LOT OF UNANSWERED QUESTIONS’

Key lawmakers who favor repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” said the directives were a step in the right direction but were no substitute for repealing the policy.

“It is unconscionable to continue to discharge servicemembers under this law,” said Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin, a Democrat. “At a minimum, we should suspend discharges based solely on sexual orientation while the study is completed this year.”

Gates defended the pace of change at the Pentagon and warned against “risky” efforts advocated by some lawmakers to implement a moratorium or an outright repeal of the policy before the Pentagon completes its full review.

While the top U.S. military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, has supported a repeal, several prominent officers and lawmakers have questioned lifting the ban at a time when the U.S. military is stretched by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Underscoring the divisions, Lieutenant General Benjamin Mixon, a senior Army commander, drew a stinging rebuke from Gates and Mullen for urging service members to write to their lawmakers to try to stop this “ill-advised” repeal.

Those who oppose allowing gays to serve openly in the military argue it would harm morale, undermine unit cohesion and hurt good order and discipline in the ranks.

Advocates of a repeal say those fears are unfounded and that the existing policy is counterproductive and unfair.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions in terms of the implementation of this,” Gates told a news conference. “Doing it hastily is very risky and I think does not address some of the concerns that have been expressed.”

Nathaniel Frank of the Palm Center, a research institute of the University of California, Santa Barbara, said the changes “show a good faith effort by the Pentagon to relax the ban.”

But he said “the ultimate impact will depend on how and whether it is enforced. History gives us cause to worry.”

The Family Research Council, a conservative Christian group, said Gates was setting “a very dangerous precedent” by taking steps that are “destructive of unit cohesion, personal morale and, ultimately, the security of our nation.”

(Additional reporting by Deborah Charles; Editing by Paul Simao)
Adam Entous

Protest against Delhi High Court decision on Article 377 on homosexuality in Delhi

New Delhi, July 5 (ANI): A group of Sikh and Hindu activists staged a demonstration in the national capital to protest the Delhi High Court’s recent verdict on Article 377.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday decriminalised Article 377, allowing consensual sex between persons of same gender above 18 years of age.

Members of National Akali Dal along with members of Santan Dharam Sabha, a Hindu organisation, staged the protest and demanded government authorities to step in to prevent passing of the law.

“We are planning to meet the President and the Home Minister. If we do not get assurance from them within a week we will move to the Supreme Court and contest our case there,” Manohar Lal Kumar, one of the activists said.

The current law bans “sex against the order of nature,” and is widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex in India.

The court’s decision to overturn a British colonial era law on same-gender sex dismayed various religious groups but led to a wave of delight among gay activists and health workers.

The verdict can still be challenged in the Supreme Court.

The 1861 law prohibiting “sex against the order of nature”-widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex-has not yet been repealed and carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years.

Petitions to change the 1861 law have so far been firmly rejected by the Governments previously. But there has been some softening up on the stand recently with some ministers suggesting the possibility of revoking the ban was being discussed.

Thursday’s court verdict came after nine years of legal proceedings initiated by India’s gay groups. (ANI)

Protest against Delhi High Court decision on Article 377 staged in Delhi

New Delhi, July 5 (ANI): A group of Sikh and Hindu activists staged a demonstration in the national capital to protest the Delhi High Court’s recent verdict on Article 377.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday decriminalised Article 377, allowing consensual sex between persons of same gender above 18 years of age.

Members of National Akali Dal along with members of Santan Dharam Sabha, a Hindu organisation, staged the protest and demanded government authorities to step in to prevent passing of the law.

“We are planning to meet the President and the Home Minister. If we do not get assurance from them within a week we will move to the Supreme Court and contest our case there,” Manohar Lal Kumar, one of the activists said.

The current law bans “sex against the order of nature,” and is widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex in India.

The court’s decision to overturn a British colonial era law on same-gender sex dismayed various religious groups but led to a wave of delight among gay activists and health workers.

The verdict can still be challenged in the Supreme Court.

The 1861 law prohibiting “sex against the order of nature”-widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex-has not yet been repealed and carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years.

Petitions to change the 1861 law have so far been firmly rejected by the Governments previously. But there has been some softening up on the stand recently with some ministers suggesting the possibility of revoking the ban was being discussed.

Thursday’s court verdict came after nine years of legal proceedings initiated by India’s gay groups. (ANI)

Mixed reactions to Delhi HC ruling to decriminalise homosexuality

New Delhi July 2 (ANI): The landmark judgement of the Delhi High Court to decriminalise homosexuality has received mixed responses.

Even as gay activists termed the ruling as progressive, religious leaders condemned it saying that the judgement would harm Indian culture, Political parties reacted cautiously to the judgement.

Earlier in the day a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of Chief Justice A P Shah and Mr.Justice S. Muralidhar, gave a verdict to decriminalise homosexuality.

NGOs welcomed the judgement calling it as “progressive.”

Anjali Gopalan founder of the NAZ Foundation, which filed the petition before the Delhi High Court said, “This is very progressive judgement which recognises the right to equality.”

“Now, it seems, we are in 21st century as the rights of homosexuals have been recognised by the high court,” Anjali said.

Anjali also said gay rights activists had never sought the total scrapping of the penal provisions of Section 377 and fought against exclusion of a section of society because of their sexual preferences.

Expressing her happiness over the verdict advocate Mehak Sethi, who fought the case for NAZ Foundation said the verdict excluded unnatural sex from penal provision of Section 377, but it retained the penal provisions with respect to child abuse.

Reacting to the judgement, Congress spokesperson Ahmed Patel said its is between the court and the government and party has nothing do with it.

Strongly disapproving the judgement, Imam Ahmed Bukhari of the Jama Masjid said, “This is absolutely wrong to legalise homosexuality. We will not accept any such law,” and also said that he will oppose any attempt of the government to amend Section 377 of IPC.

Reacting in same line, Maulana Khalid Rashid Firangi Mahli, member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said “Homosexuality is against all religions and also against Indian culture. It should not be legalised. This unnatural behaviour should continue as a criminal act.”

“The churches have no objection to decriminalisation of homosexuality because we do not consider these people as criminals on par with other criminals but there should not be any attempt to legalise it,” said Father Immanuel said.

He also said the churches do not approve of homosexual relations as ethical and moral right of the people. (ANI)

Drew Barrymore joins gay activists’ rally

London, May 28 (ANI): Actress Drew Barrymore along with Emmy Rossum and other celebrities rallied on the streets of Hollywood to protest against the new California ban on gay marriage.

The celebrities joined thousands of activists to protest about the re-instatement of Propsal 8, which bans same-sex marriages after they were legalised briefly last year.

Star Trek actor George Takei, Kelly Osbourne, Sophia Bush, comedienne Kathy Griffin and singer/actress Deborah Gibson are among other celebrities who have criticised California’s approval of the ban.

“I was raised a good Catholic girl and nowhere in church do I remember it ever being an issue for everybody to be treated equally. I can’t believe it’s 2009 and this is still an issue,” the Daily Express quoted Gibson as saying.

Osbourne added, “It goes without saying that if you love someone, you should be able to marry them no matter.” (ANI)

California Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban

California Supreme Court upholds gay marriage banSan Francisco – California’s Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a voter-backed ban on gay marriages in America’s largest state, disappointing gay activists who had argued that the ban was unconstitutional because it discriminated against people on the grounds of their sexual preference.

The court’s 6-1 ruling means that same sex couples will not be allowed to marry in California at least until the ban is overturned at the ballot box.

But in a unanimous decision the court also decided that the estimated 18,000 gay couples who tied the knot before the law took effect can stay wed.

The majority ruling written by Chief Justice Ronald M. George, said that the November voter initiative banning gay marriage was neither an illegal constitutional revision nor unconstitutional because it took away an inalienable right, as gay advocates and California Attorney General Jerry Brown had argued.

The decision was met with howls of protests by thousands of gay activists who gathered outside the San Francisco courthouse.(dpa)

Amazon rating ‘error’ angers gay activists

Amazon.com has apologized for an error due to which the sales ranking were removed from tens of thousands of books, and it became difficult to
search for tomes.

In response to nearly two days of angry online commentary, Amazon.com apologized for the “embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error.” Most of the online critics complained that the problem appeared to have a disproportionate effect on gay and lesbian-themed books, leading to cries of censorship.

The titles that lost their sales rankings included James Baldwin’s ‘Giovanni’s Room’, and the gay romance novel ‘Transgressions’. But Amazon said that 57,310 books in several broad categories had been affected, including books on health and reproductive medicine.