Dietary protein may help prevent hip fractures

Washington, May 5 (ANI): Higher levels of dietary protein may protect seniors from hip fractures, a new study claims.

The new study was conducted by the Institute for Aging Research of Hebrew SeniorLife in Boston, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School.

The study, which examined the daily protein intake of 946 seniors from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study, found that individuals who were in the lowest 25 percent of dietary protein intake had approximately 50 percent more hip fractures than those who consumed greater amounts of dietary protein (all within normal intakes). Those who suffered hip fractures consumed less than the 46 grams of dietary protein per day recommended for adults.

“Study participants who consumed higher amounts of protein in their diet were significantly less likely to suffer a hip fracture,” says senior study author Marian T. Hannan, D.Sc., M.P.H., co-director of the Musculoskeletal Research Program at the Institute for Aging Research.

The study will be published this week in the online-first edition of Osteoporosis International. (ANI)

New test predicts heart disease risk more accurately

London, July 9 (ANI): Scientists have come up with a new test that can help predict a person’s risk of heart disease more accurately.

An independent external validation of QRISK, a new score for predicting a heart disease risk has been found to be more accurate than the existing test.

Researchers from the University of Oxford have recommended its widespread use across the UK, in place of the more commonly used Framingham equation.

“We are delighted to receive another strong endorsement of the value of QRISK in assessing the risk of heart disease,” said Professor Julia Hippisley-Cox of The University of Nottingham’s Division of Primary Care.

“We believe this formula has the potential to save many thousands of lives, by helping clinicians to more accurately predict those at risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

“It will arm doctors with all the information they need to decide how best to target patients with preventative measures such as lifestyle advice and cholesterol-lowering treatments,” she added.

During the study, the researchers tracked the progress of 1.07 million patients registered at 274 general practices in England and Wales for up to 12 years after first diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. All participants were aged between 35 and 74 at the start of the study.

Soon every patient’s record will contain an automatically calculated heart risk score allowing GPs to identify and target those at greatest risk.

The new research has been published in the British Medical Journal. (ANI)

Now, simple finger device to predict future heart attack, stroke

Washington, Mar 27 (ANI): People who are considered at low or moderate risk of cardiac problems can now use a simple, non-invasive finger sensor test to know their chances of future heart events, such as heart attack or stroke, according to researchers at Mayo Clinic.

EndoPAT, the noninvasive finger test device, developed by Itamar Medical, measures the health of endothelial cells by measuring blood flow.

EndoPAT consists of digital recording equipment and two finger probes that look like large thimbles.

Endothelial cells line the blood vessels and regulate normal blood flow. It’s already known that if the cells don’t function properly – a condition called endothelial dysfunction – it can lead to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) causing major cardiovascular health problems.

Amir Lerman, M.D., a cardiologist at Mayo Clinic and the senior author of the study said that earlier, there wasn’t any simple test for endothelium function.

It was found that 49 percent of patients whose EndoPAT test indicated poor endothelial function had a cardiac event during the seven-year study.

The researchers used the device to test 270 patients between the ages of 42 and 66 and followed their progress from August 1999 to August 2007.

The patients already knew that they had low-to-medium risk of experiencing a major heart event, based on their Framingham Risk Score-the commonly used risk predictor developed from the Framingham Heart Study, a longitudinal study of heart disease.

Lerman claimed that some of their risk factors included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity and a family history of heart disease.

“The results of the study may help identify a discriminating tool beyond the Framingham Risk Score. And the results of these individual tests may help physicians change a patient’s medications or recommend other therapies, so they don’t have a heart attack or stroke later on,” he said.

Lerman also added that the test may be used in an individualized medicine model of risk assessment of the patients.

The study will be presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session in Orlando. (ANI)

Now, simple finger device to predict future heart attack, stroke

Washington, Mar 27 (ANI): People who are considered at low or moderate risk of cardiac problems can now use a simple, non-invasive finger sensor test to know their chances of future heart events, such as heart attack or stroke, according to researchers at Mayo Clinic.

EndoPAT, the noninvasive finger test device, developed by Itamar Medical, measures the health of endothelial cells by measuring blood flow.

EndoPAT consists of digital recording equipment and two finger probes that look like large thimbles.

Endothelial cells line the blood vessels and regulate normal blood flow. It’s already known that if the cells don’t function properly – a condition called endothelial dysfunction – it can lead to atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) causing major cardiovascular health problems.

Amir Lerman, M.D., a cardiologist at Mayo Clinic and the senior author of the study said that earlier, there wasn’t any simple test for endothelium function.

It was found that 49 percent of patients whose EndoPAT test indicated poor endothelial function had a cardiac event during the seven-year study.

The researchers used the device to test 270 patients between the ages of 42 and 66 and followed their progress from August 1999 to August 2007.

The patients already knew that they had low-to-medium risk of experiencing a major heart event, based on their Framingham Risk Score-the commonly used risk predictor developed from the Framingham Heart Study, a longitudinal study of heart disease.

Lerman claimed that some of their risk factors included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity and a family history of heart disease.

“The results of the study may help identify a discriminating tool beyond the Framingham Risk Score. And the results of these individual tests may help physicians change a patient’s medications or recommend other therapies, so they don’t have a heart attack or stroke later on,” he said.

Lerman also added that the test may be used in an individualized medicine model of risk assessment of the patients.

The study will be presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session in Orlando. (ANI)

A bit of booze is best for your bones

Washington, Mar 14 (ANI): While alcohol consumption has always been attributed to devastating effects on health, a new study has revealed that moderate consumption might make bones stronger in older adults.

An international team of experts headed by Katherine Tucker studied a cohort of older adults in the Framingham Offspring Study to determine an association between alcohol consumption and bone mineral density.

“Moderate alcohol consumption was shown to contribute to stronger bones (measured as hip and spine bone mineral density),” said ASN Spokesperson Stephanie Atkinson, PhD.

The study showed that 1-3 glasses of beer in men and more than 2 glasses of wine or liquor (but not beer) for women is likely to have a positive effect on bone.

The positive effect might be attributed to bone preserving ingredients like silicon in beer and resveratrol in wine in addition to the alcohol.

“Such positive effects on bone must be balanced against the risk of falls and bone fractures caused by consuming excessive alcohol,” Atkinson added.

The study is published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. (ANI)

‘Fat neck’ may signal heart risk

London, Mar 12 (ANI): Besides ballooned waistlines, a fat neck may also signal possible trouble for the heart, warns a new study.

According to researchers from the Framingham Heart Study, the thickness of an individual’s neck may provide clues to their risk of developing heart problems.

The boffins said that even those with relatively trim waistlines appeared to be at greater risk if they had larger necks.

In the study, risk was defined as having lower levels of “good” cholesterol for instance, or higher levels of blood glucose.

The results were presented to a meeting of the American Heart Association.

To reach the conclusion, the team looked at more than 3,300 women and men with an average age of 51.

In the research, average neck circumferences were 40.5cm for men and 34.2cm for women. For every nearly-3cm more of neck, men had 2.2 milligrams of less good cholesterol per decilitre of blood (mg/dl) and women 2.7mg/dl.

Good cholesterol – or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) – takes cholesterol away from the cells and back to the liver, where it is broken down, reports The BBC.

Having lower than 40mg/dl if you are a man, and 50 mg/dl if you are a woman is thought to put you at higher risk of heart disease.

Neck size made no difference to levels of bad cholesterol – or low density lipoprotein (LDL) – which can cause harm, but it did affect blood glucose levels – for every 3cm more of neck men had 3.0mg/dl more and women 2.1mg/dl.

While risk was higher regardless of waistline, it was compounded for those who had both a fat neck and who were larger than average around the middle, eth research found.

The team speculated that a fat neck may be a “crude measure” of upper body fat – which has been associated with heart risks.

Professor Jimmy Bell of the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre said: “What you don’t want is fat around your liver or heart, and this can happen even if you look fine on the outside. Dieting isn’t what you need to shift this – it’s exercise.” (ANI)

Systolic, diastolic blood pressures combo ‘better predictor of heart attack’

Washington, Feb 19 (ANI): People with a combination of low diastolic blood pressure and a high systolic blood pressure are at a greater risk of heart attack and stroke, according to a UC Irvine study.

Both diastolic and systolic blood pressure values give a better idea of a person’s risk of heart attack as compared to the systolic blood pressure values alone.

Dr. Stanley Franklin and colleagues at the UC Irvine Heart Disease Prevention Program in collaboration with researchers at the Framingham Heart Study reviewed blood pressure data from 9,657 participants in the Framingham Heart Study who had not received antihypertensive treatment.

It was found that diastolic blood pressure under 70 mm Hg along with high systolic numbers is a superior predictor of future adverse cardiovascular events.

“Systolic blood pressure as a single blood pressure component is usually superior to diastolic blood pressure in predicting cardiovascular risk in middle-aged and older individuals,” Franklin said.

He added: “But a very high or very low diastolic blood pressure can add to the risks identified by systolic blood pressure alone.”

Currently, physicians diagnose hypertension with systolic and diastolic readings of 140/90 and above.

But, the study indicated that doctors should give even greater consideration to systolic blood pressure when the diastolic blood pressure is low.

However, Franklin said that a diastolic number under 70 mm Hg when combined with a systolic blood pressure less that 120 mm Hg indicates normal values with no increased cardiovascular risk.

The low diastolic blood pressure must be coupled with an elevated systolic reading to indicate increased risk.

The combination of blood pressure components is an indicator of increased stiffening of arteries, which is a strong risk factor for future heart attacks and strokes. (ANI)

Family history raises Alzheimer’s risk

Washington, Feb 19 (ANI): A team researchers at Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) has found that people who have parents diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia are significantly more likely than others to experience memory loss.

The study found that this is true even in middle-aged persons who do not have a diagnosis of clinical stroke or dementia.

For the study, researchers studied 715 participants (372 women, 343 men) of Framingham Heart Study (FHS) (average age 59) using standardized cognitive tests and MRI brain scans.

One group of 282 persons had one or both parents fulfilling standardized criteria for a diagnosis of dementia, the other group of 433 persons had parents who were known to be free of dementia.

The researchers also tested all these individuals for a gene thought to be a strong risk factor for dementia, called the ApoE e4 gene.

Among persons who were carriers of the ApoE e4 gene, those who had parents with Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia scored significantly worse on tests of verbal memory and visual memory than persons who did not have parents with Alzheimer’s dementia.

“Parental dementia and Alzheimer’s disease were significantly associated with poorer performance in verbal and visual memory tasks,” said senior author Sudha Seshadri, MD, associate professor of neurology and co-director of the Medical Education for Neurology Residency Program at Boston University School of Medicine.

Researchers further concluded that the result in persons with parents who have Alzheimer’s disease is equivalent to approximately 15 years of brain aging.

The effect was largely limited to those study participants who have the ApoE e4 gene, which supports the idea that the gene is probably at least partially responsible for the transmission of Alzheimer’s disease risk between generations.

This study will be presented at a Plenary Session at the American Academy of Neurology’s 61st Annual Meeting in Seattle, Wash from April 25 – May 2. (ANI)

2 genetic variants linked to increased hypertension risk identified

London, Feb 16 (ANI): Scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital have identified two common genetic variants associated with increased risk of hypertension – a significant risk factor for heart attack, stroke and kidney failure.

The variants are located on two genes called NPPA and NPPB, which control proteins that relax blood vessels and help the excretion of dietary sodium.

Both genes are involved in the production of atrial and B-type natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP).

“It’s well known that hypertension can run in families, and a few rare genetic syndromes that raise blood pressure have been identified,” Nature magazine quoted Dr Christopher Newton-Cheh, MPH of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Centre for Human Genetic Research and Cardiovascular Research Centre, first author, as saying.

“But the common genetic basis for the type of hypertension that affects a billion individuals around the world has been very difficult to establish,” he added.

During the study, the researchers examined the genetic data from almost 30,000 individuals.

They first screened 1,700 participants in the Framingham Heart Study for 13 common variations – called single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) – in the NPPA and NPPB genes, looking for any correlation with levels of ANP and BNP.

The variants associated with changes in natriuretic peptide levels were then tested in the same individuals for any association with blood pressure levels.

One variant, present in almost 90 percent of the population, was found to be associated with a 20 percent reduction of ANP levels and an 18 percent greater incidence of hypertension.

The other variant had a similar, although less pronounced, effect on ANP levels and blood pressure.

“Natriuretic peptides are known to be produced by the heart when it is stressed, and screening for peptide levels is widely used to diagnose heart failure, a condition in which they are sharply elevated,” said senior author Thomas Wang, MD, of the MGH Cardiology Division.

“It’s currently premature to advocate screening natriuretic peptide levels or gene variants to diagnose hypertension risk, but someday it may be possible to treat natriuretic-peptide-deficient individuals with therapies that restore normal levels and reduce risk,” he added.

The findings have been reported in the journal Nature Genetics. (ANI)

More accurate tests needed to predict cardiovascular problems in the elderly: Study

London, January 9 (ANI): Dutch researchers are calling for the replacement of a traditional system for assessing the risk of cardiovascular disease amongst older people with some new and more accurate tests.

The suggestion comes following a study that looked at several hundred people without the history of cardiovascular disease, aged 85 over, over a five-year period, to see which of them succumbed to events like stroke and heart disease, and whether different ways of assessing their risk of such disease at the start proved to be more accurate.

The Framingham Risk Score system, which has been in use for decades to predict the 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease in people with no history of cardiovascular disease, uses classic risk factors including sex, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes, and smoking.

According to the researchers, the ability of these classic risk factors to identify a person at high risk of heart disease diminishes as the age advances.

They reveal that several new biomarkers for cardiovascular disease have recently been shown to be effective at indicating high risk of such disease, including C-reactive protein and homocysteine.

During the Dutch research, 302 people without the history of cardiovascular disease—215men and 87 women—were studied. The subjects were participating in the existing Leiden 85-plus Study, and were followed up for five years.

As well as using the Framingham Risk Score, the researchers also measured plasma levels of the new biomarkers homocysteine, folic acid, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in the people.

Of the 302 participants, 108 died during the follow-up period, 32 percent of the deaths were from cardiovascular disease.

The researchers found that classic risk factors were unable to predict cardiovascular deaths accurately, neither by using the Framingham Risk Score nor by using the classic risk factors in a newly calibrated model.

From the new biomarkers used, homocysteine had the best ability to predict deaths.

The research team reported that of the 35 people who succumbed to cardiovascular disease during the five years studied, the Framingham Risk Score had classified just 12 people as being at high risk.

However, the homocysteine-based model had classified 20 people as being high risk—nearly a quarter more of all individuals who died from cardiovascular disease.

Based on their observations, the researchers came to the conclusion that single homocysteine measurement could accurately identify very elderly people who are at high risk of dying from cardiovascular disease.

They call for a larger study to be carried out as their findings could lead to a change to current guidelines.

“Possibly, plasma homocysteine, and not classic risk factors, could be used to select very elderly people for primary preventive interventions,” the researchers say.

The study appears in the online edition of the British Medical Journal. (ANI)

Conventional risk assessment tools do not accurately predict coronary heart disease

Washington, Jan 7 (ANI): Traditional risk assessment tools, like the Framingham and National Cholesterol Education Program tools, NCEP, do not accurately predict coronary heart disease, according to a study by researchers at Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, CT.

The study was conducted on 1,653 patients who had no history of coronary heart disease, other than 738 patients who were taking statins (cholesterol lowering drugs like Lipitor) because of increased risk of developing coronary heart disease.

All the patients underwent a coronary CT angiogram and doctors compared their risk of coronary heart disease, determined by the Framingham and NCEP risk assessment tools, to the amount of plaque actually found in their arteries as a result of the scan.

According to the results, 21 percent of the patients believed to be in need of statin drugs before the scan (because of the Framingham and NCEP assessment tools) did not require them.

“26percent of the patients who were already taking statins (because of the risk factor assessment tools) had no detectable plaque at all,” said Kevin M. Johnson, MD, lead author of the study.

He added: “Risk assessment tools are used by physicians implicitly. Physicians use them as a way to separate and treat patients accordingly. Ultimately, the Framingham influences what every physician does, but I feel it is not good enough to show what is happening with each individual patient.

“The average person tends to put a lot of weight on family history, but the association between that and coronary heart disease is only modest,” said Dr. Johnson. “We are living in an era where genetic research is in the headlines, but reality is a lot more complicated than that.

“There are still 400,000 people a year who die from heart attacks and have no warning signs at all; doctors want to be able to find those people before that happens and I hope this study gets people interested in finding out better predictors for coronary heart disease.”

This study appears in the January issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology. (ANI)