Russia’s Khodorkovsky declares hunger strike – report

Jailed former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky has declared a hunger strike to protest against the extension of his detention in a notorious Moscow prison, a Russian radio station reported on Monday.

Khodorkovsky, once Russia’s richest man, was arrested in 2003 after falling foul of Vladimir Putin’s Kremlin, and is serving an eight-year sentence for tax evasion after a trial his supporters dismissed as a farce.

Last week Khodorkovsky’s detention in Moscow’s notorious Sailor’s Rest prison was extended by three months by the judge in a second trial which could lead to him being sentenced to an additional 22 years on charges of theft and money laundering.

The Russian News Service radio station posted a letter on its website (www.rusnovosti.ru), addressed by Khodorkovsky to the head of the Russian Supreme Court, demanding that President Dmitry Medvedev be informed about the illegality of the decision to extend his detention.

“I declare an indefinite hunger strike until I get confirmation that Medvedev has received … comprehensive information” about the decision, the letter says.

Khodorkovsky last year went on hunger strike for almost two weeks in protest at the treatment of a jailed colleague who was gravely ill with HIV/AIDS. He ended the protest when Vasily Alexanian was moved to a civilian clinic.

Representatives of Khodorkovsky did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

(Writing by Conor Humphries; editing by Andrew Roche)

EU pulls Darfur poll observers over safety fears

The European Union on Wednesday withdrew its election observers from Sudan’s Darfur region, saying safety fears were hindering their work.

Sudan is days away from what should be its first multi-party presidential, legislative and gubernatorial elections in 24 years, but opposition parties have said the polls in Darfur will be a farce while a seven-year conflict continues in the region.

“I have decided to come back with all the team. The six observers who are…in Darfur,” Veronique De Keyser, who heads the EU’s election mission in Sudan, told reporters.

There has been a rash of kidnappings of Westerners in Darfur together with repeated bandit attacks and reports of fresh fighting between rebels and government forces.

President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for suspected war crimes in Darfur, hopes to reinforce his rule with an election victory.

De Keyser said she was concerned the team would only be able to see a fraction of the voting, due to take place from Sunday to Tuesday, and could miss irregularities.

“We are forced to stay in a very limited area … There is a risk of putting the credibility of the whole mission in danger,” she said.

The Belgian member of the European Parliament said the team was well treated in Darfur, but she had been worried for their safety in remote areas.

NO ACCESS

“In some parts of Darfur the violence is terrible. The humanitarians cannot access this area. And if aid cannot access, we cannot access,” she added.

The observers, who flew back on a private plane hired by the mission, said they were disappointed to leave but prepared to move on to watch the elections in other parts of Sudan. “We have to face up to the reality of the situation,” said one.

The EU team, which arrived in Darfur in mid March, consists of two observers in each of the three state capitals.

Violence flared in Darfur in 2003 when mostly non-Arab rebels took up arms against Sudan’s government, accusing it of neglecting to develop the region.

The United Nations estimates that up to 300,000 people may have died after the government mounted a counter insurgency, arming mostly Arab militias. Khartoum rejects the accusation, putting the death count at 10,000.

De Keyser said she was also worried after Bashir threatened to expel international observers who pushed for a delay in the ballot. He threatened to cut off their fingers and tongues.

“You don’t usually treat international observers you have invited like that. … It doesn’t reflect the traditional hospitality of the Arab world,” she said.

Sudanese activists and electoral observers on Wednesday urged the international observer missions to withdraw fully from Africa’s largest country.

“International elections observer missions should immediately pull out of Sudan,” they said in a joint statement.

The activists said the international observers could not fully cover the 10,000 voting centres and with the U.S.-based Carter Center being the only long-term mission, the others had missed most of the fraud during last year’s voter registration.

“These missions lend the appearance of legitimacy to what has been proven to be a deeply flawed elections process and the presumed re-election of a man who is internationally wanted for war crimes in a vote that is neither free nor fair.”

The EU is the largest international mission with some 130 observers.

Brit woman, 66, fined £1K for selling goldfish to teenager

London, March 31 (ANI): A British great grandmother has been slapped with a fine of 1,000 pounds and ordered to wear an electronic tag for trading a goldfish to a teenaged boy.

Council officials caught pet shop owner Joan Higgins, 66, in an undercover sting.

Legal proceedings – costing an estimated 20,000 pounds – against her took eight months following which she was fined and slapped with a curfew.

And now Joan is not allowed to babysit her great grandson at his mother’s home or go to bingo.

Her son Mark, 47, of Sale, Greater Manchester, was asked to pay a fine of 750 pounds and ordered to complete 120 hours of unpaid work.

However, he has criticised the prosecution.

“I think it’s a farce and legal lunacy and I told the council that. What gets me so cross is that they put my mum on a tag. She’s nearly 70, for goodness’ sake,” the Daily Star quoted Mark, as saying.

He added: “Mum has been running the shop for 28 years and this is the first time that anything like this has ever happened.”

Last July the mother and son duo were caught selling goldfish to a 14-year-old boy, who was sent to the shop by Trafford council bosses.

A bill passed in 2005 makes it illegal to sell goldfish to under-16s and offenders can be sent to jail for up to a year.

At a hearing at Trafford Magistrates Joan and Mark pleaded guilty to selling the fish. (ANI)

Petition fights ambulance volunteers plan

Upper Hunter MP George Souris says he will maintain pressure on the New South Wales Government to drop a controversial plan to use volunteer ambulance drivers across his electorate.

He has taken possession of 1,000 submissions from residents of Merriwa, Murrurundi, Dungog, Stroud, Bulahdelah and Gloucester opposing the idea.

While the ambulance service and the paramedics’ union try to negotiate a compromise, Mr Souris says he will again take the community’s concerns to Parliament.

“I’m going to be presenting over 1,000 signatures to the Parliament and that’s just from Merriwa,” he said.

“That’s on behalf of the other towns and on behalf of the rest of the state.

“This issue is escalating not dying away as the mine would hope. It’s not safe in terms of the drivers, it’s not safe in terms of the patients. It’s a second-rate service, we will not accept it.

“It’s time for the Government to end the farce and go back to proper crewing of ambulance services for every community.”

AHL boss denies allegations of tax rorts

The owner of Australia’s largest pokies operator has denied allegations of massive tax rorting.

Newspapers have reported that Bruce Mathieson, the owner of the Australian Leisure and Hospitality Group, has rorted more than $15 million through private arrangements with sporting and AFL clubs.

Mr Mathieson says his business is legitimate, and has dismissed the claims.

He says he has no knowledge of any investigation against him, and is seeking legal advice.

“I don’t know anything about it,” he said.

“I’m sure the gaming commission doesn’t know anything about it or they’d be all over me like pepper and salt. It’s just an absolute farce as far as I’m concerned,” he said.

Abbott rebuffs health briefing offer

Health Minister Nicola Roxon says Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has not yet bothered to attend a Government briefing on its new health policy.

But Mr Abbott’s health spokesman says the briefings are a farce and a “political stunt” aimed at making the Government look like it is taking a bipartisan approach.

During yesterday’s health debate Prime Minister Kevin Rudd urged Mr Abbott to cooperate on health policy, but Mr Abbott is rebuffing his calls because he says Mr Rudd insists on “lying” to discredit his record as health minister.

Ms Roxon has told AM a briefing was offered when the plan was released.

“So far he hasn’t taken up that offer,” she said.

“I think it’s strange that Mr Abbott seems to be so determined to throw mud that he’s not actually prepared to pick up the toolbox and be involved in this debate.”

But Opposition health spokesman Peter Dutton says the Government’s offer is not genuine.

“We’ve had briefings on legislation during the course of the last 12 months which have been a complete farce,” he told ABC 2.

“I’ve had a goon sitting in with the departmental officials from the minister’s office. The department officials refuse to answer the most basic of questions.

“I’m not going to be part of a political stunt process.”

Mr Abbott has told 2GB radio he will not work with Mr Rudd on the policy unless he stops making the claim that the Opposition Leader “ripped” $1 billion out of the health system in his time as health minister.

“One minute he is smiling at me and saying, ‘Come on, let’s work constructively together’, and the next minute he gets all snarly and accuses me of doing terrible things to the health system,” he said.

“I think it’s very hard to work with someone who is basically calling you a liar, and that’s what Mr Rudd does.”

Mr Rudd has been endorsed by most commentators as the winner of yesterday’s health debate.

Mr Abbott was forced to make negative attacks in the absence of a Coalition health policy, while Mr Rudd presented a more positive front.

Both “worms” on Channel 9 and Channel 7 also favoured Mr Rudd.

But Mr Abbott says he is not worried.

“The worm has never liked Liberals. It never liked John Howard. If the worm had its way Mark Latham would have been prime minister.”

Mr Rudd is today meeting with West Australian Premier Colin Barnett to discuss his health plan, which proposes a 60 per cent funding takeover of public hospitals.

WA, New South Wales and Victoria have raised concerns about the proposal, but if they do not agree to it at the April 19 COAG meeting the Government will take it to the voters with a referendum.

Detained Suu Kyi says would snub Myanmar polls

Myanmar’s detained opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi said on Tuesday she “would not dream” of registering her party for this year’s elections, but added the decision was not for her to make, according to her lawyer.

Suu Kyi, who has been detained for 15 of the last 21 years, would refuse to sign her party up for the polls because of “unjust” election laws, but insisted the comment was not an order or an instruction to other members.

“Personally, I would not dream of registering the NLD under such an unjust and one-sidedly drawn-up state constitution,” her lawyer and National League for Democracy (NLD) party member, Nyan Win, quoted Suu Kyi as saying after meeting the Nobel laureate.

The charismatic Suu Kyi is unable to run in the much-derided election because of her marriage to a foreigner, British citizenship of her children and her criminal record.

Critics say the military government is fearful of her huge popularity and international appeal and has sought to keep her under lock and key to minimise her influence.

The NLD party, which won the last polls in 1990 by a landslide but was never allowed to rule, has yet to make a decision on whether it will take part in this year’s election, a date for which has yet to be announced.

There is disagreement among the NLD’s 128 committee members on whether to take part in the elections.

Some say the constitution is a farce and are in favour of a boycott, which other members believe such a decision would make the country’s biggest opposition party a spent political force.

“There are some who would like to go ahead but most are against it,” Nyan Win said, adding that the party would make its decision on March 29.

Myanmar’s military, which has ruled the former British colony for almost five decades, recently annulled the result of the 1990 vote, stating in official media that it did not comply with new rules passed this month.

“MOCKERY OF DEMOCRACY”

The laws also say parties that register for the elections must exclude members serving prison terms, a rule the United States said made a mockery of democracy. Parties that fail to register could be dissolved by the junta.

Many senior NLD members are among more than 2,000 prisoners of conscience in Myanmar, where the regime denies detaining anyone because of their political views.

Nyan Win said the NLD had filed a lawsuit against the regime regarding the new laws, but it was rejected by the Supreme Court.

Separately, two new political parties registered with the newly formed election commission on Tuesday, party sources told Reuters.

They were the 88 Generation Students of the Union of Myanmar (GSUM) and the Union of Myanmar National Political Force (UMNPF) parties.

Both are regarded as being close to the military, which will automatically be given 25 percent of seats in parliament.

Analysts say the junta, which will retain full control of key ministries, will likely field proxy parties so it can dominate the lower house and restrict the powers of elected opponents.

Critics say the election, which is the final part of the junta’s drawn out “road map” to democracy, will be a sham aimed at creating a facade of civilian rule with the military still calling the shots.

(Writing by Martin Petty; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Liberals yet to grasp Labor’s loosened power grip

If the opinion polls are accurate, then there could be two states of confusion around midnight Saturday.

There is a real chance that both state elections – South Australia and Tasmania – could produce hung parliaments; in other words with neither of the major parties having enough seats to govern in their own right.

That in itself would be a poor result for the Labor brand, given that they now govern in both states. It would continue a trend away from Labor at recent state elections.

In those circumstances, undoubtedly the analysis will be that both Labor’s grip on power around the country is in decline, and that the Liberal and National parties are in resurgence.

But that is only half true, otherwise the state parliaments would be headed for outright Liberal victories rather than the likely twilight zone of minority governments.

It seems as if the electorate in many places is ready to throw out Labor governments, but the conservative parties clearly haven’t yet done enough to demand government in their own right. They by and large have failed to provide the credible and trusted alternative required of new governments.

That is essentially what happened last year in Queensland.

After four straight wins, Labor under Anna Bligh was suddenly vulnerable. But the electorate never did warm to the alternative under Lawrence Springborg, and so the Liberal Nationals fell short.

Similarly in NSW, the Labor Government has been on the nose for years, universally judged as the worst in the country. Yet still under Kristina Keneally, they have just a sniff of mounting a remarkable comeback. If the opposition under Barry O’Farrell was more appealing, then victory would be assured, no matter what.

In Victoria, the Brumby Government leads comfortably in the polls. But it doesn’t deserve to. The new ticketing system for public transport is a hugely expensive farce, replacing a system that has irritated commuters for years. On top of that, the Planning Minister, Justin Madden, should be in real trouble over a leaked government strategy document, written by his former press secretary, Peta Duke.

It said that the Government planned to release a report on the Windsor Hotel redevelopment for comment, and then use the reaction to reject the proposal. The memo was sent by mistake to an ABC journalist.

The Minister has so far deflected the issue by insisting his staffer was freelancing. But it defies logic to argue that a staff member would either devise such a plan by herself, or mistakenly believe that such a plan was being hatched.

Either way, it is a further indictment on the ineffectiveness of yet another opposition at the state level.

Saturday night might mark the beginning of a real and genuine resurgence by the Liberals, but the figures will need to reflect more than just a dissatisfaction with the government of the day.

And how dissatisfied are voters at the federal level?

Much was made of the booing of Kevin Rudd at Brisbane’s Lang Park during a rugby league match a week ago. It struck some observers as significant because the Prime Minister is a Queenslander and up until that moment, there had been little to suggest that he wasn’t continuing to travel well in his home state.

It was difficult to make too much of it because the crowd was simply reacting to a shot of the PM that had suddenly appeared on the big screen.

No such ambiguity when Gough Whitlam strode out onto Lang Park with the late Senator, Ron McAuliffe, in 1975.

With the crowd giving him a genuine bollocking, Whitlam turned to McAuliffe and said: “Ron, if I knew you were this unpopular, I would never have come to the match.”

Bob Hawke was having similar problems in the 80s, routinely booed when he stepped on to the MCG to present the cup to the AFL premiers.

So his political adviser Geoff Walsh proposed to the AFL that they nominate a living legend each year to present the cup, and the prime minister would then simply accompany the legend to the stage. A keen Bulldog fan, he suggested Ted Whitten be the first.

It worked a treat. Nobody was prepared to boo the prime minister in the presence of such greatness.

Walsh has recently joined the Bulldogs’ board and with initiatives such as that, he could be the off field equivalent to Barry Hall.

Barrie Cassidy hosts Insiders and Offsiders on ABC1.

Is honesty always the best policy?

Funny, but the acknowledgment of traditional owners at the beginning of a speech always struck me as quite the opposite of glib. And I’ve heard my share. The life of the working journalist, much like the life of the working politician, is punctuated by public speaking and its usually over-formal, often halting, always routine embellishments.

Tony Abbott thinks the preferred modern form that acknowledges the traditional Aboriginal owners of the land spoken upon is an ‘empty gesture’, unlike, one imagines, the standard acknowledgment in descending order of significance of every other luminary physically present in the room.

These are the little formulas that propel public appearances, that tidy the niceties of introduction and give some sense of form to public speech.

“Mr president, madam deputy, members of the committee, fellow inmates, ladies and gentlemen…”

What we are dealing with here is basic politeness; good manners.

Which is all the acknowledgment of traditional ownership is, surely? A tip of the hat to an ancient affinity? A mere act of courtesy? And yet something too that is subtly deeper.

Perhaps it is this inner sense of an acknowledged deep connection and past possession – and thus of eventual dispossession — that troubles the conservative mind more than the fact that the gesture might not be always heartfelt.

That seems to be the sense we get from Wilson Tuckey:

“I think it makes a farce of it… You might remember, going back to the days of sorry, my criticism of the quality of Aboriginal dance — the persons concerned were grossly overweight and in fact in no way added to that ceremony, and it’s gone too far. And I refuse, I never have, thanked anyone for the right to be on the soil that is Australian.”

And perhaps from Tony Abbott too, whose reputation for straight talk precedes him, rather a like a welcome to his own particular intellectual country.

Do conservatives object to the sense of politically correct rote in the acknowledgment of traditional owners, or do they worry more than what is being said has an effect that is unusually sincere; that in all the empty forms of public life this is one that inevitably carries meaning no matter how glib or banal the delivery?

Interesting that Tony Abbott should raise the issue. A talking point with not too much hanging on it. A quiet nailing of colours to the mast.

Interesting too that it should come with last night’s Four Corners profile of the Liberal leader, one that focussed on Abbott’s enduring social conservatism and devotedly Catholic moral sense.

Not all of these are attitudes calculated to win broad political approval – his attitude to abortion and a general sense of lofty paternalism being just two — something Abbott must wrestle with. In the weeks and months ahead it will be interesting to see how much the instinct for straight and honest talk wins out over the imperative to be popular.

It seems an inherent contradiction in Abbott: the man who derives much political credit for being a straight and honest speaker, but one who might also do himself political harm if he were to give too honest an airing to his deepest inner beliefs.

Tuckey told to apologise for Aboriginal remarks

The Greens say Federal Liberal backbencher Wilson Tuckey should be kicked out of his party if he does not apologise for comments he made about Aboriginal people.

Mr Tuckey says acknowledging traditional owners of land at official functions is a farce and should not be done.

“I have never thanked anyone for the right to be on the soil that is Australian,” he said.

He also says some performers of welcome-to-country ceremonies are “grossly overweight”.

Greens leader Bob Brown says Mr Tuckey should apologise.

“If Wilson Tuckey does not have the common sense or grace or decency to withdraw, he should be removed from the Liberal Party,” Senator Brown said.

“They should not be harbouring somebody who’s capable of making such obnoxious statements.

“[Opposition Leader] Tony Abbott should demand an apology from Wilson Tuckey.”

But Liberal frontbencher Peter Dutton says Mr Tuckey has a right to speak his mind even if people disagree with the comments.

“I don’t have any issue with what Wilson said frankly or his right to say it.”

Mr Abbott believes acknowledging Indigenous ownership as a matter of course is tokenistic and that it should only be done at suitable events.

Resignation offer

Meanwhile, Mr Dutton says he offered to resign over his decision not to participate in the apology to the Stolen Generations.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the apology in early 2008.

Mr Dutton was the only Liberal frontbencher not to attend the speech because he did not think it would improve the living conditions for Aboriginal people.

He says he realised at the time that his decision would be hard for the then opposition leader, Brendan Nelson.

“I offered my resignation to Brendan Nelson,” he said.

“What I said to him was exactly what I said before – if legislation comes through, regardless of cost, if there’s a benefit that’s going to be provided to lifting people out of poverty to changing the future for a generation, then I would do that.”

CPI lashes out at Government over austerity and price rise

New Delhi, Mar 16 (ANI): The Communist Party of India (CPI) slammed the Congress-led Central Government for not addressing the problem of price rise in the country.

Talking to reporters here on Monday, CPI General Secretary B Bardhan accused the government of hoodwink people in the name of austerity drive.

“The austerity drive itself was a farce, it was a farce, a maneuver, an attempt to deceive the people, an attempt to cheat them, it was a fraud. There is no austerity in the government of India. The way expenditure is incurred; we see what is this austerity; can they tell the press or us how much money they have saved in the so called austerity drive?” asked Bardhan.

Bardhan also criticised Finance Minister and the Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission for hoodwinking the nation on price rise and inflation.

“Every now and then either the Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission or the Finance Minister or some other representative of the government goes on claiming that this (inflation) is marginally coming down. Last week they had said that the inflation rate i.e. the food inflation rate has come down by 0.06 percent, now this is a mockery,” Bardhan said.

The austerity drive was started last by the Central Government that asked ministers and bureaucrats to cut down on needless expenses at a time of recession and deepening drought.

The government”s austerity measures may come to an end on March 31.

Annual wholesale price inflation accelerated to 9.89 percent in February, the highest since October 2008 and well above the Reserve Bank of India”s end-March projection of 8.5 percent and the 8.56 percent January reading.

The inflation data comes on the heels of a 16.7 percent annual jump in industrial output in January, with the unexpectedly strong economic pickup also backing the case for the central bank to raise policy rates by at least 25 basis points. (ANI)

‘Recognition not tokenism’: Aboriginal groups

Aboriginal groups have rejected claims by the federal Opposition leader Tony Abbott that acknowledging the traditional owners of land at official functions is tokenism.

Mr Abbott says there are occasions when it is appropriate but most times it just looks like formalism and tokenism.

West Australian MP Wilson Tuckey says it is a farce and should not be done at all.

But, the Kimberley Land Council has stressed the importance of acknowledging Aboriginals at official functions.

The KLC’s Nolan Hunter says Aboriginals need to be recognised for the sacrifices they have made in the past and their long history.

“If you consider that Aboriginal people are Australia’s oldest living culture, people ought to be proud that Aboriginal people are part of their society.”

A spokesman for the South West Land and Sea Council in Western Australia Glen Kelly says acknowledgement is necessary.

“It’s not tokenism, it’s actually recognition.”

“In Nyoongah culture and, I dare say, in Aboriginal culture across Australia, it’s very important that when you visit someone else’s country that you recognise the people who are there and get ceremonially introduced and accepted to that country.”

Aboriginal recognition a farce: Tuckey

Outspoken Liberal backbencher Wilson Tuckey has backed Opposition Leader Tony Abbott’s criticism of politicians acknowledging traditional landowners at official events.

Mr Abbott ignited debate on the issue when he accused Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and his ministers of engaging in “tokenism” and unnecessary political correctness when they acknowledge traditional owners while speaking at functions.

“I certainly make these acknowledgements at what I think are suitable occasions. But to do it as a matter of course, to do it automatically – it does just look like formalism and tokenism,” he said.

Mr Tuckey went further, saying the acknowledgement of traditional owners was a “farce”.

“I have never thanked anyone for the right to be on the soil that is Australian,” he said.

Mr Tuckey has also criticised some Aboriginal dancers who perform welcome to country ceremonies as “grossly overweight” and says things have gone “downhill” for Indigenous people ever since the 1967 referendum.

He said that before white settlement the “best” Indigenous people had managed to get out of Australia was a “population of 300,000 people”.

“I have said publicly that 1967, when the Australian people voted to give this Parliament an opportunity to assist Aboriginal people, was the worst thing that’s happened for Aboriginal people in history – it’s been downhill ever since,” he said.

In the 1967 referendum Australians voted to change the wording of the constitution to give the Commonwealth powers to make laws governing Indigenous people and allow them to be counted in the census.

Acknowledgement a ‘fad’

Mr Abbott also has backing for his “tokenism” comments from senior Liberal frontbencher Eric Abetz, who has described acknowledging traditional owners as a “fad”.

“In general terms, I find it personally to be quite paternalistic, and why don’t we acknowledge a whole host of other people and indeed deities?” he said.

“It’s one of these fads that hit for a while and is now starting to fade. That’s what happens with fads.”

Greens Senator Bob Brown says acknowledgement has a place, but only if it is genuine and with Indigenous involvement.

“I don’t think it needs to be a non-Indigenous performance, which is token,” he said.

And Senator Brown says it should be done at the beginning of each Parliamentary day.

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon says he does not have a problem with acknowledging traditional owners at functions.

“I think the issue is we need to follow up those fine sentiments with action,” he said.

Respectful

Aboriginal groups say acknowledging traditional owners is respectful and should continue.

“It’s actually recognition,” said Glen Kelly, a spokesman for the South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council in Western Australia.

“In Nyoongah culture, and I dare say Aboriginal culture across Australia, it’s very important that when you visit someone else’s country that you recognise that.

“You recognise the people who are there and get ceremonially introduced and accepted to that country.”

Mr Kelly says the practice is the same as acknowledging VIPs at official functions.

“When people make the recognition, it needs to be heartfelt, and it’s unfortunate that if people do feel it’s tokenism, they don’t want to make the recognition,” he said.

But Darryl Pearce, the CEO of the Alice Springs native title body Lhere Artepe, says there has been a “hollowness” in the gesture by politicians on some occasions.

“The other side of it is when Aboriginal people are welcoming people to country, there is some really heartfelt and truthful performances in terms of encouraging people to share our country,” he said.

“So I guess in one sense it’s kind of now asking the politicians to match us with actions rather than just words.”

Barcelona does an about turn, offers Eto’o new three-year deal

London, July 1 (ANI): The Samuel Eto’o transfer saga descended into farce last night as Barcelona offered him a new three-year deal.

However, the Cameroonian striker’s agent is suspicious of the club’s motives and claims Eto’o may yet join Manchester City, reports The Sun.

Eto’o has one year left on his current 110,000-pound-a-week deal and Barca say they want to extend that by two years – keeping him on the same wage.

But with City ready to pay 250,000-pounds-a-week, Eto’o, 28, will not stay unless he gets a big pay hike.

Agent Josep Maria Mesalles is not sure whether Barca want to keep Eto’o or are just trying to stop him leaving on a free next term.

“If we find out for sure that they don’t want him, then we will do our best to find him another club and Manchester City would be a good option,” he said. (ANI)

Kate Winslet says her perfect accent belies her ‘working class hero’ status

London, Apr 29 (ANI): Oscar-winning actress Kate Winslet has complained that she is wrongly perceived as middle class because of her perfect diction.

The 33-year-old stunner, who has vowed audiences all around the world with her exceptional acting abilities, insists that she was a daughter of out-of-work actors who struggled to pay the bills.

While expressing her annoyance at those who doubted her working class credentials, she told The Telegraph: “People don’t believe that. People literally think I’m lying.”

Asked why the British did not regard her as a ‘working class hero’, she replied: “Because I speak nice.”
Keeping the topic of the conversation same, Winslet recalled an audition as a teenager in which a director, upon hearing her accent, refused to believe she was from Reading.

She revealed: “He went, ‘I hope you’re not as dishonest in your work as you are about your own life.’ I was shocked. My dad was very much a struggling actor and spent more of his life as a postman, as a member of a tarmac firm, as a van driver. He’d sell Christmas trees. Anything. That was my dad.

“We had these dreadful second-hand cars that would always die a death, or we’d go on holiday to Cornwall, come back and it would have been nicked. It’s like a Joe Orton farce, my family. Honestly, it was hand-me-down shoes and 10p pocket money on a Saturday that didn’t go up until I was 11.” (ANI)

Congress attacks Jaswant Singh for defending Advani

New Delhi, Apr 25 (ANI): The Congress on Saturday attacked senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Jaswant Singh for his latest claim that BJP’s primeministerial candidate L.K. Advani had opposed the decision to free terrorists during the Kandahar hijack crisis.

Talking to reporters here, party spokesperson Rajiv Shukla termed Jawant Singh’s attempt to defend Advani as a “complete farce” and said that he was “unnecessarily blaming” former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

“Why to blame unnecessarily an old Brahmin Vajpayee who is not able to defend himself because of ill health,” Shukla said.

Jaswant Singh had claimed that Advani, who was the Home Minister in 1999, when the Kandahar plane hijack episode took place, was not in favour of the proposal to swap terrorists for hostages.

He had said that the then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had, in fact, asked him (Jaswant Singh) to meet Advani to persuade him to agree to the exchange. Advani later had to agree to the Union Cabinet’s consensus on the issue, he said.

Advani had earlier said that he was unaware that the then External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh accompanied the three terrorists released in exchange for passengers of hijacked Indian Airlines plane to Kandahar in 1999.

Reacting sharply to Singh’s comments, Congress president Sonia Gandhi, on Friday had accused the BJP of telling a thousand lies to hide a single lie.

“The question is not what happened in Kandahar, it is about telling the truth. You have to admit – say yes, we made a mistake. This reminds me of the saying: you tell a thousand lies to hide one lie,” she said at a rally in Gujarat’s Kheralu. (ANI)

Pak skipper Younis Khan scores his first triple ton in Tests

Karachi, Feb.24 (ANI): Karachi’s National Stadium was set alight on Tuesday by fireworks from Pakistan cricket captain Younis Khan’s bat. Taking full advantage of a dead pitch, Khan scored his maiden triple-century, and the third by a Pakistani batsman – to push the match towards an inevitable draw.

The only interest now left in the contest is whether Khan will try to break Brian Lara’s Test record of 400.

Khan brought up his triple ton with a reverse-sweep. Khan reached the landmark with 27 hits to the fence and four over the top.

The game lapsed into a farce in the last session with Sri Lankan cricket captain Mahela Jayawardene giving Tillakaratne Dilshan, Tharanga Paranavitana, Kumar Sangakkara and himself some overs.

Jayawardene picked up the wicket of Faisal Iqbal. Younis helped himself to easy boundaries in that phase and moved from 243 to his triple-hundred.

All of Sri Lanka’s bowlers toiled on the fourth day, including champion spinners Muthiah Murlitharan and Ajantha Mendis. They both got a wicket each. The pace bowlers-Chaminda Vaas and Dilhara Fernando couldn’t do much either.

In reply to Sri Lanka’s mamoth 644 for seven, Pakistan scored 574 for the loss of five wickets. Khan is batting on 306 and keeping him company is wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal on 23. (ANI)