Barrister fined over false documents

A former Mildura barrister has avoided a conviction for forging his wife’s signature to make and use false documents.

Ballarat Magistrates Court, in central Victoria, heard Graeme Jackson, 56, set up a company in 1992 to act as a family trust.

He made his then wife Kerryn the director and secretary of the company but did not tell her.

Between 1994 and 2001 he received her tax returns, forged her signature and deposited them on the family home loan.

Jackson pleaded guilty to two counts of making a false document and five counts of using a false document.

The prosecution urged magistrate Peter Couzens to fine and convict Jackson, but his defence lawyer, Ian Hills QC, said his high profile client had already suffered enough through humiliation.

Mr Couzens fined Jackson $5,000 without conviction.

MJ’s mother wins will ruling

London, September 19 (ANI): Michael Jackson’s mother Katherine can challenge the administrators of the singer’s estate without any threat to her 40 per cent stake, a judge has ruled.

The 79-year-old’s legal team said that she wants to have more say over the manner in which the 400 million dollar estate is handled.

According to the ruling, the King of Pop’s mum will not breach a ‘no contest’ clause in the family trust if she sets up a challenge before the executors over Jackson’s will, reports the Sun.

Katherine is the legal guardian of the star’s children, Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11, and seven-year-old Prince Michael II, after his sudden death on June 25.

She will receive more than 1 million dollars a year from his estate including a sum of 26,804 dollars a month for herself apart from a monthly allowance of 60,000 dollars for the three kids, as per the court’s order. (ANI)

Jacko’s exclusion of father from will is not snub, says Jermaine Jackson

Washington, Jul 4 (ANI): Late King of Pop Michael Jackson’s exclusion of his father from his will has not been seen as a snub by the singer’s brother Jermaine, who insists Joe will also benefit from the estate.

Jacko had drawn up a will in 2002 in which he left his entire estate to a family trust, comprising of his mother Katherine and his three children.

There was no mention his father, who Jackson claimed had physically abused him and his siblings as a child.

“Joe’s exclusion doesn’t bother me, because if my mother’s mentioned, my father’s fine,” Contactmusic quoted Jermaine as saying.

“I mean, if my mother’s fine, we’re all fine. But most important, it’s not about money. It’s not about property. We’re a family. We don’t let that get in the way. That’s not important to us. That’s not important,” he added.

Joe and Katherine Jackson wed in 1949 but have been separated for years. However, they never filed for divorce.

Joe lives in Las Vegas, while Katherine resides in the family compound in Encino, California. (ANI)

Michael Jackson will – Details of Michael Jackson will – Will of Michael Jackson – Michael Jackson Final Will

Michael Jackson will – Details of Michael Jackson will – Will of Michael Jackson – Michael Jackson Final Will

Michael Jackson’s will has been filed in an LA court. The Michal Jackson will is dated July 7, 2002, which estimates his estate at that time at more than $500 million.

The late Pop King designated singer and good friend Diana Ross to look after his children if his mother passed away before him, reports said.

The will gives his entire estate to a Jackson family trust. The Michael Jackson will cuts out his former wife Debbie Rowe.

The Michael Jackson estimated half billion US dollar estate includes; “non-cash, non-liquid assets, including primarily an interest in a catalogue of music royalty rights which is currently being administered by Sony ATV, and the interests of various entities.”

Screen shot of Michael Jackson’s will is show below :

Michael Jackson will - Details of Michael Jackson will - Will of Michael Jackson - Michael Jackson Final Will

Naveen Chawla to replace Gopalaswami as CEC

New Delhi, Mar 1 (ANI): Election Commissioner Naveen Chawla has been appointed as next Chief Election Commissioner (CEC).

A Rashtrapati Bhavan commnique has said that the President Pratibha Patil has approved the name of Chawla for the post.

Patil on Sunday rejected CEC N Gopalaswami’s recommendation to remove Chawla from the poll panel.

The CEC had written to the President in January to remove Chawla, triggering an unseemly row in the constitutional panel and a bitter war of words between the Congress-led UPA government and the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

Chawla is known for his proximity to the Congress party. Two years back, he was alleged to have taken money from Congress politicians for his family trust.

In January 2008, BJP leaders took the matter up with the CEC Gopalaswami who served a notice on Chawla.

However, Gopalaswami has claimed that his adverse recommendation, which comes a whole year after BJP’s complaint, is based on his own experience and observations of Chawla”s work as Election Commissioner.

In his affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, Gopalaswami has said that the CEC had suo motu (where an agency acts on its own cognizance) power to recommend the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Gopalaswami will retire as CEC on April 20. (ANI)

President Patil rejects CEC’s recommendation to remove Naveen Chawla

New Delhi, Mar 1 (ANI): President Pratibha Patil today rejected the recommendations of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) N Gopalaswami to remove Election Commissioner Naveen Chawla from the poll panel.

A Rashtrapati Bhawan communique said the President had received a recommendation to this effect from the Union Government and taken a decision after taking a considered view on the issue.

The development comes days ahead of an announcement of a schedule for general elections.

The three-member Commission is widely expected to announce poll dates in a day or two.

Chawla is known for his proximity to the Congress party. Two years back, he was alleged to have taken money from Congress politicians for his family trust.

In 2006, the BJP submitted a petition to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam seeking the removal of Chawla from his office under Article 324(5) of the Constitution. BJP Leader L. K. Advani had alleged that Chawla was close to the Congress Party.

When Kalam forwarded the petition to the Prime Minister, the UPA Government found no merit in the BJP allegations.

Later, the BJP took its demand to the Supreme Court where its arguments seemed to make no headway. It withdrew the petition in August 2007.

In January 2008, BJP leaders took the matter up with the CEC Gopalaswami who served a notice on Chawla.

However, Gopalaswami has claimed that his adverse recommendation, which comes a whole year after BJP’s complaint, is based on his own experience and observations of Chawla’s work as Election Commissioner.

In his affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, Gopalaswami has said that the CEC had suo motu (where an agency acts on its own cognizance) power to recommend the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Gopalaswami will retire as CEC on April 20 and Chawla is expected to succeed him. (ANI)

I won’t resign: Navin Chawla

New Delhi, Jan 31 (ANI): Election Commissioner Navin Chawla has ruled out the possibility of his resignation in the wake of a recommendation by the Chief Election Commissioner N Gopalaswami seeking his removal.

“We will work unitedly towards general elections, there is no confusion,” Chawla said.

Earlier, Chief Election Commissioner N. Gopalaswami had demanded Chawla’s removal over charges of “partisanship”. He had sent his recommendation to the President nearly fifteen days ago, and has been forwarded it to the Prime Minister.

The move is being seen in government and media circles as having serious institutional and political ramifications, even as the country is getting ready for general elections to be held in April-May this year.

Chawla is known for his proximity to the Congress party. Two years back, he was alleged to have taken money from the congress politicians for his family trust.

In 2006, BJP submitted a petition to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam seeking the removal of Chawla from his office under Article 324(5) of the Constitution. BJP Leader L. K. Advani had alleged that Chawla was close to the Congress Party.

When Kalam forwarded the petition to the Prime Minister, the UPA Government found no merit in the BJP’s allegations.

Later, the BJP took its demand to the Supreme Court where its arguments seemed to make no headway. It withdrew the petition in August 2007.

In January 2008, the BJP leaders took the matter up with the CEC Gopalaswami who served a notice on Chawla.

However, Gopalaswami has claimed that his adverse recommendation, which comes a whole year after BJP’s complaint, is based on his own experience and observations of Chawla’s work as Election Commissioner.

In his affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, Gopalaswami has said that the CEC had suo motu (where an agency acts on its own cognizance) power to recommend the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Gopalaswami will retire as CEC on April 20 and Chawla is expected to succeed him. (ANI)

CEC Gopalaswami seeks removal of Navin Chawla

New Delhi, Jan 31 (ANI): Chief Election Commissioner N. Gopalaswami has demanded the removal of Election Commissioner Navin Chawla over charges of “partisanship”. He has sent his recommendation to the President, who has forwarded it to the Prime Minister.

The move is being seen in government and media circles as having serious institutional and political ramifications, even as the country is getting ready for general elections to be held in April-May this year.

Chawla is known for his proximity to the Congress party. Two years back, he was alleged to have taken money from the congress politicians for his family trust.

In 2006, BJP submitted a petition to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam seeking the removal of Chawla from his office under Article 324(5) of the Constitution. BJP Leader L. K. Advani had alleged that Chawla was close to the Congress Party.

When Kalam forwarded the petition to the Prime Minister, the UPA Government found no merit in the BJP’s allegations.

Later, the BJP took its demand to the Supreme Court where its arguments seemed to make no headway. It withdrew the petition in August 2007.

In January 2008, the BJP leaders took the matter up with the CEC Gopalaswami who served a notice on Chawla.

However, Gopalaswami has claimed that his adverse recommendation, which comes a whole year after BJP’s complaint, is based on his own experience and observations of Chawla’s work as Election Commissioner.

In his affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, Gopalaswami has said that the CEC had suo motu (where an agency acts on its own cognizance) power to recommend the removal of an Election Commissioner.

Gopalaswami will retire as CEC on April 20 and Chawla is expected to succeed him.(ANI)