Why the Glass is Half-Full on Climate Change Legislation

Last week, Democrats in the U.S. Senate called off their efforts to craft comprehensive climate change legislation, a bill that would have put a price on carbon via a cap-and-trade mechanism. It’s another in a series of disappointing moves by the Senate of late, but that’s a topic for another time…. Instead I’d like to argue that the lack of cap-and-trade legislation won’t actually affect the behavior of most businesses all that much, since they are pursuing energy efficiency and other steps toward sustainability for other reasons.

Our ongoing surveys of businesses around the world reveal that the potential for cost-reduction is the primary motivation for green IT and sustainability investments and initiatives. Reducing energy-related operating expenses in particular was cited by almost 70 percent of survey respondents in our latest reading of April 2010 (see chart below). And we found that other drivers, like improving brand perception (cited by 35 percent of respondents) and simply doing the right thing for the environment (28 percent), are cited more frequently in our survey results than regulatory compliance (17 percent).

In fact, complying with present or prospective regulation has been declining as a motivation for sustainability initiatives over the last 3 years. The figure below shows what’s really driving green actions (click on the image to see a larger version).

What’s going on here? Our half-full perspective is that businesses are finding business rationales for investing in sustainability. Rather than regulation being imposed from without, companies are finding reasons from within to improve their environmental postures.

Their actions are driven by self-interest — appeal to customers, improve margins, increase operational efficiency — and are therefore more likely to be driven deep into the fabric of corporate policies and practices. So while we would rather have seen the Senate step up to responsible climate change legislation, and that would undoubtedly be an incremental spur to corporate action, we remain optimistic that sustainability programs are becoming part of mainstream business operations for most companies and institutions. The same week that the Senate punted on legislation, the executive branch announced that it will reduce indirect GHG emissions by expanding telecommuting and teleconferencing options for federal employees.

The federal government is the single largest energy consumer in the U.S. economy, and as such, its influence as an implementer of sustainability programs, as a role model for state and local governments, and as a purchaser of green technology products and services, will have more influence over the next few years than any climate change would have had.

Chris Mines is a vice president and research director at Forrester Research, advising tech industry strategists. He leads a research team that predicts and quantifies growth and disruption in the technology industry, focusing on the economics and business models of IT suppliers, and emerging trends in technology adoption. Currently, his research is centered on the role of information technology in enabling sustainability initiatives and improving corporate environmental responsibility.

GE Discovers Demand for Its Energy Efficiency Treasure Hunts

Over the last five years, teams of General Electric (GE) employees have scoured the company’s various facilities in pursuit of a common enemy: wasted energy.

With eyes peeled for unnecessary lights and underperforming equipment, the teams’ sole mission revolved around making the sites more efficient. Since 2005, more than 200 of these exercises, called Treasure Hunts, revealed energy savings exceeding $130 million.

Now the company is expanding the program beyond its facilities to include hospitals, universities, city buildings and private sites through a new collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). The sites, which include existing GE customers, will learn how to conduct treasure hunts, while GE and EDF will work to verify the energy savings and identify and disseminate industry best practices.

GE has already demonstrated that the Treasure Hunt program, which is part of the company’s wide-ranging ecomagination initiative, works in other settings. A Treasure Hunt held last month at Continuum Health Partners’ (CHP) Roosevelt Hospital in New York uncovered energy savings opportunities totaling $2.1 million, with an average payback of 2.6 years. That translates to more than 7,500 metric tons of emissions reductions each year.

The next sites for Treasure Hunts will include facilities for Merck, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and the cities of Orlando and Atlanta.

The No. 1 criteria for an ideal Treasure Hunt site is enthusiasm, said Beth Trask, EDF’s Innovation Exchange deputy director who also works with the organization’s Corporate Partnership Program.

“There needs to be buy-in at the management level, front line level, and everywhere else for a Treasure Hunt to work,” Trask said. “It’s about an entire site team getting involved. You have to really want to do this.”

Trask described a Treasure Hunt as a “high-energy event.” After participants complete the training and planning stages, teams spend about 2.5 days doing nothing but looking for energy efficiency opportunities, typically beginning on a Sunday when there is less activity at the facility. At the end of the exercise, the teams compile a report that quantifies the potential savings with estimated return on investment and recommended plan of action.

“Everyone is involved,” Trask said. “Not everything has a dollar attached — maybe they just turned lights off.”

Commercial Building Retrofits Could Save $41B a Year, Study Says

Owners of commercial buildings in the U.S. could save more than $41 billion a year in energy costs, if all currently existing commercial space were placed in a decade-long energy efficiency retrofit program requiring an annual investment of about $22.5 billion, according to a new report by Pike Research.

The report by the cleantech market intelligence firm acknowledges that while the figures are impressive, they reflect the market potential for energy efficiency retrofits — rather than the actual market, which under current conditions is a fraction of the potential.

“The building retrofit industry faces a number of key challenges,” Pike Managing Director Clint Wheelock said in a statement accompanying the release of the report. “The current financial crisis has had a significant dampening effect on property owners’ investments in their properties. Financing for such projects is scarce, and the limited investment in building efficiency is not keeping pace with the growing national demand for energy.”

Private commercial buildings present the largest untapped opportunity for energy efficiency retrofits and account for nearly all existing commercial space, the research firm noted. In contrast, federal non-industrial buildings comprise less than 3 percent of existing commercial space, but major retrofits in federal facilities and other institutional buildings are far more likely to receive funding than projects outside the sector.

The Pike study, “Energy Efficiency Retrofits for Commercial and Public Buildings,” examines market drivers, barriers and scenarios that could contribute to the market reaching its potential — and those that would impede it if left unaddressed.

The report said:

“If the goal of the energy retrofit industry is to spend a little money on efficiency, while total national demand for energy continues to grow, then present policy is functioning well. However, if the goal is to reduce the total demand for energy in buildings over time, by the 50 percent or more needed to address international competitiveness, global warming, and energy independence, then present energy policy needs a substantial retrofit.

If code policy, design tools, financial incentives, and regulations focus on energy efficiency at the following intervention points [as identified by nonprofit research organization Architecture 2030], the incremental cost of efficiency will be very small:

* ‘Building design – schematic design, material and building systems selection
* Existing building purchases
* Leasing/tenant improvements
* Building renovation cycles
* Rebuilding (after a natural disaster)’

Programs that do not recognize these intervention points or take advantage of them face unnecessary obstacles, costs, and potential failure. A national carbon trading system could have a major effect on the retrofit market. If national carbon-emissions legislation addressed energy use in commercial buildings with a combination of high energy prices and reinvested incentives, then the market for energy efficiency retrofits (and for educating the workers in this market) would explode with activity.”

The executive summary of report is available for free download from Pike Research. The full report is available for a fee.

Image of 300 West Sixth Street, named one of BOMA’s Outstanding Buildings for 2010, courtesy of the Thomas Property Group.

Climate Corps 2010: Making the Bloomberg Experience More Efficient

On my first day as an EDF Climate Corps fellow, I walked into the Bloomberg L.P. offices in New York City and was completely blown away by the remarkable lighting displays throughout the building.

A quick tour revealed that the building has three primary functions:

• Office space
• Data centers
• Broadcast studios

I immediately realized that the bright, colorful lighting in the building was primarily installed for its artistic value and not for its functionality. I understood that my goal for the summer was to find ways of increasing energy efficiency for Bloomberg, and removing this type of lighting would be an easy way to do just that.

But it wasn’t that easy. By recommending that the lighting be replaced, I would be taking away from the building’s aesthetics, a unique part of the company’s culture. I knew that I needed to dig around for other options that wouldn’t compromise the building’s multiple purposes — not even the artistic ones.

Bloomberg has already reduced its energy consumption by 11 percent in three years, while simultaneously adding space and employees. I figured that if Bloomberg could benefit the environment while expanding its business, I could certainly get creative with my dilemma.

After the tour, I went back to my desk determined to develop a plan for tackling this complex situation. I came up with three rules to help structure my approach, and I have used them to formulate recommendations.

1. Look for Changes that Affect the Entire Building

I started by looking into what major components were used in all three types of space. I realized that focusing on mechanisms, such as ducts and HVAC systems, would yield substantial improvements and prove cost effective. These components have a large scale effect on overall energy efficiency because of their presence throughout the entire building. Cross-building projects seem complex at first, but are manageable and lead to substantial improvements in energy efficiency.

2. Separate by Primary Use

My next step was to look at the different parts of the building. I started with the office space, concentrating on the lighting. By breaking the building apart and focusing on manageable situations, it was easier to find meaningful efficiency gains. The key was focusing on specific projects that could be accomplished, instead of getting bogged down by the differences between the spaces.

3. Work Within the Culture

When determining projects, it is important to look through the lens of Bloomberg’s vibrant and energetic culture. The building’s interior aesthetics and design are an important part of what makes the Bloomberg experience so enchanting. In an attempt to keep that experience in tact, I decided to install lower watt lamps and ballasts that use less energy and do not affect the building’s aesthetic charm.

Following these three steps for identifying energy efficiency improvements in a multi-purpose building with a unique culture has allowed me to formulate a structured plan, focusing on high priority initiatives that will lead to meaningful improvements.

Brian Hartmann is a 2010 Climate Corps Fellow at Bloomberg, an MBA candidate at the Erb Institute at the University of Michigan, and a Net Impact member. Further coverage of the Climate Corps program is available at GreenBiz.com/edfclimatecorps. This content is cross-posted at the Environmental Defense Fund Innovation Exchange Blog.

Energy Department Has a New Commitment to Solar (and a New Blog)

The Department of Energy launched a new blog last week, the aptly named (yet uninspiring) Energy Blog. Among other announcements and musings (OK, really more statements than deep thoughts) is a call to develop three Energy Innovation Hubs, one of which will drive research to turn sunlight into fuels.

This is not the first time the Obama Administration has shelled out for sunlight fuels. Last October, ARPA-E, the advanced projects research group at the Department of Energy, gave out $23.7 million in grants to startups and universities experimenting in the relatively new field of direct solar fuels. The current award will give out up to $122 million over the next five years to one Hub for developing this one technology.

The Energy Innovation Hubs will be modeled after the Manhattan Project, the AT&T Bell Laboratories and on the three $25 million-per-year DOE Bioenergy Research Centers. The other two Hubs will research energy efficiency in buildings systems and modeling and simulation for nuclear reactors.

For the sunlight fuels, there are already various universities that are working on direct solar fuels, including the University of Minnesota, MIT, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Penn State. BioCee and the University of Minnesota wants to take sunlight, carbon dioxide and two organisms (cyanobacteria for sunlight capture and shewanella for metabolic transformation) to produce a liquid hydrocarbon, while MIT-spinoff Sun Catayltix uses sunlight to spilt water to produce hydrogen.

The DOE is hoping that these Hubs will be able to lay the groundwork with critical research to the point where the technology can be handed off to the private sector.

Among the other chatter from Scott Blake Harris, DOE blogger and General Counsel for the Department of Energy, is a call for public written comments on how to meet smart grid goals. The blog has a link to check out what’s already been gathered and also to submit additional feedback via email by August 9, 2010 to help shape a report due out this fall about modernizing the grid.

The Energy Blog feels a lot like the DOE News page, although you don’t find a lot of calls to tweet the DOE on the news page. The information, like updates on the Global Energy Efficiency Challenge (super-efficient appliances, energy efficiency for large commercial buildings, smart grid action, getting 20 million EVs on the road by 2020 — all lofty ideals with vague roadmaps and funding), is presented in the nearly same format as it would be in other sections of the DOE website.

Also, as this is not Twitter, and certainly not Gawker, there is not likely to be any real additional breaking information, insider views or gaffes that come across this blog. Not unless you count the fact that their RSS feed tab was broken today.

Climate Corps 2010: Reaching Beyond the ‘Low-Hanging Fruit’

When I originally set out to spend the summer as an EDF Climate Corps fellow at eBay Inc., I anticipated spending my 10-week fellowship focused on making the business case for energy efficiency in the company’s data centers. On my first day at eBay headquarters, I realized I had been mistaken. The greatest energy efficiency gains would actually not be in the data centers, but found elsewhere.

Near the start of my fellowship, eBay Inc. unveiled a new data center named Project Topaz that was 30 percent more efficient than any other data center in the company’s portfolio. In “geek speak,” it has a power usage effectiveness (PUE) rating of 1.4 thanks to water-side economization, in-row cooling and 400V power distribution.

As a Climate Corps fellow who has been trained on data center efficiency measures aimed at enabling companies to pick low-hanging fruit and cut costs on wasted energy, it has been nearly impossible to make any recommendations for a facility that is already so advanced in its green initiatives.

Obviously I needed to refocus the scope of my project.

Thankfully, my supervisor introduced me to colleagues throughout the organization in workplace resources, procurement, IT and corporate communications. Considering over 2,400 of eBay Inc.’s employees are members of the Green Team, I was not surprised by the contagious enthusiasm for sustainability.

Academic studies on energy efficiency in California show that while commercial consumption has grown, efficiency has remained the same. Despite this marketplace reality, I was not surprised to hear that as of May 2010, the number of watts per listing on eBay had declined 55 percent since the second quarter of 2008. Members of the Green Team are efficiency experts in a company that has championed sustainability in both its e-commerce business as well as its own operational footprint. Atop the building I’ve been sitting in this summer, stands the largest commercial solar installation in San Jose. Next to it is a 500kW installation of Bloom Energy boxes that together account for more than 30 percent of the campus’s energy needs.

All of these factors do, however, make my 10-week treasure hunt for energy efficiency that much more difficult.
!–pagebreak–

While other Climate Corps fellows this year have reported massive savings from finding lights on at night and changing fluorescent lighting to T-8s from T-12s, eBay’s facilities and operations have yet to yield such low-hanging fruit.

The Green Team has already installed automated lighting schedules and motion sensors, upgraded to T-8s years ago, employed direct digital control and air-side economization in HVAC, and certified a building as LEED Gold back in 2008. I even eat from the “Low-Carbon Diet” line at the cafeteria.

Very rapidly, I’ve adjusted any expectations of sweeping in to heroically discover major energy efficiency gains. This is not to say that eBay Inc. has finished a “job well done.” On the contrary, I have found my value add this summer as a needed resource for ongoing projects as colleagues try to manage the energy usage and carbon output of their business unit or department. Although energy efficiency is a continuing goal, rarely does a decision-maker understand the energy impacts of each option up for consideration without relying on other expertise.

And who knows? I still have three weeks left this summer — plenty of time to continue digging around for that hidden goldmine of energy efficiency treasure.

Megan Rast is a 2010 EDF Climate Corps fellow at eBay Inc. and a member of Net Impact. She is an MBA candidate at Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley. Further coverage of the Climate Corps program is available at GreenBiz.com/edfclimatecorps. This content is cross-posted at Environmental Defense Fund Innovation Exchange Blog.

Navigating the Laws and Ecolabels for Energy Efficiency

To be successful in the marketplace, manufacturers of any product using energy must be current on efficiency standards. And to be competitive, those companies should also consider third-party certification that their goods meet or exceed efficiency requirements.

That can be a tremendous challenge for businesses. Regulations differ across the globe and are subject to change.

As for ecolabels, there are at least 500 in existence and new ones continue to emerge. Sorting through them for credible third-party assessment systems can be like trying to find your way through a jungle, says Marcello Manca, vice president and general manager of UL Environment, the spinoff of safety testing giant Underwriters Laboratories that investigates and certifies the environmental claims of products.

The good news is there are ways to keep abreast of regulatory changes for energy efficiency and strategies for finding respected, reliable third-party certification programs. Manca and three fellow panelists shared their tips for doing so in a recent webinar presented by UL Environment, the U.S. Department of Commerce and GreenBiz.com.

The webinar has been archived and is available for free viewing at:
here

With Manca, who is based in Milan, Italy; Sylvia Mohr, Commerce Department standards specialist for the U.S. mission to the European Union, based in Brussels; Karen Barnes, director of insight for the Shelton Group and an expert on consumer mindsets, based in Tennessee; and GreenBiz.com Executive Editor Joel Makower moderating from California, the panel provided viewpoints from the standards and certifications arena, the regulatory field and the marketplace, as well as international perspective.

“There is a growing need to sort out fact from fiction,” said Makower, when it comes to product claims.

“Independent, third-party certification is a powerful resource against accusations of greenwashing,” said Manca, whose presentation included an overview of energy efficiency standards in North America. “If you have a good third-party [program] by your side, this is going to be the best defense.”

Increasingly, energy efficiency programs in North America want manufacturers to provide proof that their products meet the performance thresholds.

“In Canada, they’ve already come to the conclusion that all products should be tested by an accredited third-party entity,” Manca said of Natural Resources Canada, the government ministry that sets the energy efficiency requirements for products.

In the U.S., the Department of Energy sets federal requirements for energy efficiency of products and the California Energy Commission maintains one of the more rigorous programs for state standards. Both require products to be tested by accredited laboratories (this is limited to certain categories on the federal level).

Energy Star, the voluntary program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the DOE that seeks to identify the most energy efficient products available, is moving from a system that permitted companies to declare that their products have met performance thresholds to one that requires proof of conformance, Manca noted.

The change in the 18-year-old program follows reports that some products bearing the famous label failed to meet Energy Star standards. The reports included one released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office in March that declared the process for products to obtain the label was “vulnerable to fraud and abuse.”

The program’s shift from a “self-declaration type of program to a pre-market testing and certification type of approach” is significant, Manca said. “I think they are heading in the right direction,” he added.

Despite criticism of the program, Energy Star remains a widely recognized brand and continues to be perceived as a global leader. “What we see in the consumer pool is that Energy Star is by far the most trusted ecolabel,” said Barnes of the Shelton Group.

Manca advised firms seeking certification of their product claims to “look for the science and … for the expertise” when conducting due diligence reviews of prospective providers. “Make sure your trust is put in the right place,” he said.

Manca also emphasized that product performance standards are not static, and that strong programs take into account the need for continuous improvement. “It’s not sufficient to test a product today and expect that to be adequate for its shelf life,” he said.

Next Page: Monitoring energy efficiency standards in the EU and a reality check from the consumer marketplace.
!–pagebreak–

In the European Union, energy-elated products — televisions, lighting, fans and other products that use energy — will soon be subject to new energy efficiency requirements, and it’s important for companies to be aware of those changes, said Mohr.

She provided more than a half-dozen websites as resources for firms that have, or wish to have, products in the European Union, where the regulatory approach and the framework for setting and revising safety, environmental and energy efficiency standards are different from the processes in the U.S.

The sites can help firms keep tabs on regulatory changes in the EU, she said, strongly urging that companies doing business internationally “monitor what’s going on in the EU.”

“It’s always good to be prepared,” Mohr said. “What you know today as a regulatory standard may change.”

Barnes shared findings of consumer surveys conducted for her firm and provided a reality check for companies dealing in energy efficiency products and solutions. She also highlighted three key insights from her company’s research:

1. Consumers know less than you think they do. Even though more companies are emphasizing energy efficiency, less seems to be registering among consumers surveyed. Fewer were able to name one or two green home features last year than those surveyed in 2008.

2. They’ve got high expectations (and it’s up to you to manage them). Slightly more than half, 53.3 percent, of consumers who invested in energy efficiency products or home renovations said their utilities bills dropped as they had expected. But almost 33 percent said their bills hadn’t dropped and their vocal disappointment has produced “a lot of backlash going around about this,” Barnes said.

3. Importance doesn’t always equal action. Seventy-three percent of consumers surveyed said saving energy is important or very important. But only 31 percent said they routinely place energy saving ahead of personal comfort by setting their heating or air conditioning to recommended levels.

What’s the upshot? “Consumers are concerned about spending money right now and care about other things,” said Barnes, who recommended that companies “perform an energy intervention” to get consumers’ attention.

“You have to wake them up and tell them this is a personal problem and they need to take responsibility for it,” she said.

More details about the Shelton Group consumer poll and the advice from Manca and Mohr are provided in the archived webinar, which will be available from GreenBiz.com until July 15, 2011.

Climate Corps 2010: Pairing a Green Plan With a Corporate Culture

In a press release issued just three weeks prior to the start of my EDF Climate Corps fellowship at J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (JCP), the company publically announced its environmental goal to “reduce facility energy consumption 20 percent per gross square foot by 2015.”

A goal of this magnitude may seem daunting to most companies, but JCP’s long list of energy management conquests demonstrates that this is just another day at the office for one of the world’s leading retailers.

Already with 141 Energy Star qualified stores and counting, more than $130 million invested in energy efficiency facilities upgrades, the world’s third largest LEED Gold certified headquarters building, and a recently LEED Silver certified store in Fairview, TX, JCP is looking to other means to tackle its new energy reduction goals: employee engagement.

This is where I come in. While the majority of the 2010 EDF Climate Corps fellows will be scouring their respective company buildings for capital projects such as lighting retrofits and HVAC upgrades, I have been asked to design a strategic initiative to engage the approximately 5,500 corporate associates in JCP’s Home Office building. The goal will be to incentivize and motivate the associates to think, act, and behave with energy conservation at the forefront of their attentions.

Over the last seven weeks, my project has taken me to the four corners of the company. I’ve visited stores from San Jose, Calif., to Waxahachie, Texas; interviewed Home Office associates in departments from product development to engineering and women’s accessories; and even crossed paths with supermodel-turned-fashion designer Cindy Crawford and five-time Olympic medal winning gymnast Nastia Liukin!

NetApp Scores First-Ever Energy Star Label for Data Centers

The new Energy Star for Data Centers certification has started off with a bang, with the first facility to earn the label earning 99 out of 100 possible points for its certification.

NetApp’s RTP data center, which opened in 2009, far surpassed the needed score of 75 points to earn the EPA’s Energy Star rating for data centers, which opened for business in early June.

The facility, which is used primarily for research into storage efficiency and cloud computing services, incorporates a number of green solutions to data center energy efficiency. The data center runs at an average temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit and it uses outside are cooling for two-thirds of the year, both of which allow the company to dramatically cut down on cooling costs.

NetApp also built the facility to use less energy in distributing cooling. Rather than using raised-floor systems to fan cool air up into servers, the data center uses overhead air distribution to let the cooling system drop cold air into racks.

All told, the green design of the data center has a significant impact on NetApp’s carbon footprint, as well as its customers’: The energy efficiency of the facility saves more than 95,000 tons of CO2 emissions every year.

The RTP data center has also been used as a showcase for other companies and organizations looking to incorporate green technologies inito their data centers. NetApp says that 500 groups have toured the facility since it opened.

Though the Energy Star for data centers certification is newly launched, two members of the Environmental Defense Fund’s Climate Corps program last week laid out three ways to improve the rating, including a way to incorporate a data center’s location into its overall Energy Star score and the need for the EPA to work with utilities around the country to encourage incentives for data center efficiency.

Colt Launches Highly Efficient, Modular Data Centers

Colt, a communications and IT services company, has launched a new method for building data centers and bringing them to customers.

The Colt Modular Data Centre approach includes building and testing the entire data center, including all power and cooling equipment, in a manufacturing facility and then transporting it to its destination in either in a Colt-managed data center site or a customer’s site.

Colt says the process will allow it to deliver data center halls to customers in less than four months and the ability to build large data centers in 500 square meter (5,300 square feet) increments.

The data centers would have a target power usage effectiveness (PUE) of 1.21; PUE is a measure of a data center’s energy efficiency, with a PUE of 1 being the best efficiency rating.

Colt’s Modular Data Centre services and solutions will be handled by the newly created Colt Data Centre Services division.

Hospitals More Likely to Invest in Efficiency Than Other Industries

Healthcare organizations are more likely to invest in energy efficiency upgrades and efforts at their facilities than other industries in North America, according to research from Johnson Controls Inc. and the American Society for Healthcare Engineering.

The organization and Johnson Controls’ Institute for Building Efficiency are reporting the findings (pdf) today at the ASHE Annual Conference and Technical Exhibition, which is being held in Tampa, Fla.

In a survey conducted earlier this year, 58 percent of the professionals with decision-making authority for healthcare facilities in North America said energy management is very or extremely important to their organization. By comparison, 52 percent of decision-makers for buildings across all sectors in North America said the same, the research for Johnson Controls and ASHE found.

Complementing the findings on attitudes toward energy efficiency, facilities decision-makers said they plan energy efficiency capital investments in the next 12 months — with respondents in the healthcare sector again making a stronger showing than their counterparts across industries: 62 percent in healthcare said they plan capital investments in energy efficiency over the next 12 months compared to 52 percent across North American industries.

The survey also found that respondents in the healthcare sector said they have already taken several steps to improve energy efficiency. Lighting retrofits topped the list as shown below.

The findings represent a segment of Johnson Controls’ broad annual survey on attitudes and efforts regarding energy savings called the Energy Efficiency Indicator. The poll of 2,882 executives and managers with authority over energy investment at facilities worldwide was conducted in March, and North American were results presented in April. The respondents included 288 professionals in the healthcare industry. The International Facility Management Association was a partner in the research in addition to Johnson Controls and ASHE.

The response from healthcare facilities leaders this year compared favorably to results from 2008, when the groups last published study findings on the industry. This year, 80 percent of the building executives in healthcare surveyed said they have a goal of achieving green building certification or incorporating green elements in new construction projects. Seventy-two percent reported the same in 2008.

As in other industries, the leading driver for energy efficiency in healthcare is cost savings with brand and image enhancement taking second place as a motivator, the survey found (see chart below).

Next Page: Perceived barriers, possible solutions and more.
!–pagebreak–

Capital constraints and concerns about return on investment were cited as the chief barriers to energy efficiency investment — reasons that generally top the list perceived impediments across industries.

However, the survey results indicate an opportunity for healthcare organizations as well as energy services companies.

Relatively few hospitals and healthcare firms are taking advantage strategies that allow them pursue upgrades with no upfront capital such as power purchase agreements, shared savings agreements and energy efficiency mortgages (see chart below).

More than three-quarters said they plan to tap their facilities capital budget instead of exploring other funding mechanism.

The report on the survey concluded that while perceptions and commitments toward energy efficiency are improving, energy services practitioners can go a long way toward helping the health care sector achieve its potential for high performance, high efficiency facilities.

“it is clear that good intentions are not enough to get these types of projects implemented on a large scale,” the report said.

“There are natural barriers to an efficient market that practitioners throughout the value chain are working to correct, and with the right mix of good policy, innovative technology and new financial structures, there is hope that the efficiency of the existing healthcare building stock can be dramatically increased.”

An executive summary of the report (pdf) is available from Johnson Controls Institute for Building Efficiency.

The survey results mark the most recent report on hospitals’ and healthcare organizations’ attitudes and efforts regarding environmentally responsibility. Other research findings released this year about the need to green the industry and coverage of measures taken thus far include:

Priorities: Cost vs. Sustainability — When purchasing equipment and materials, initial cost trumps consideration of sustainable features or life expectancy for the majority of healthcare professionals surveyed by the IFMA Health Care Council and the Corporate Realty, Design and Management Institute. The organizations released results in June of surveys given to attendees at five seminars on energy, economics, the environment and healthcare.

“Envisioning the High Performance Hospital” — Hospitals can reduce energy consumption by 60 percent, and a newly built, code-compliant facility can save about $730,000 a year by redesigning the way they use energy, according to research by the University of Washington’s Integrated Design Lab and healthcare architectural firm NBBJ. The study released in May at the 2010 CleanMed Conference in Baltimore was primarily funded by the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance through its BetterBricks initiative.

Health and Green IT — Healthcare heavyweights Kaiser Permanente, Catholic Healthcare West, supply chain solutions provider Broadlane and the performance-oriented hospital group Premier announce that they are endorsing environmental standards for purchasing and managing IT equipment used in their industry. The declaration made at the annual CleanMed conference came none too soon: UK firm BridgeheadSoftware released global survey results in April showing that for the most part, green IT barely registers a pulse in healthcare.

Giving the OR a Heavy Dose of Green — Practice Greenhealth focuses on one of the largest waste-generating center in hospitals and launches its Greening the OR Initiative at the CleanMed conference.

Greening the Supply Chain — Kaiser introduces a green scorecard to its $1-billion supply chain for medical products. The largest HMO in the U.S. hopes that its best practices for the purchase of everything from gauze to MRIs will influence the industry.

Solar-Powered Hospitals — Kaiser launches a solar initiative. Its first wave involves installation of solar power systems totaling 15 megawatts at California facilities.

Greener Products — General Electric’s ecomagination line adds five new healthcare products in February: a new digital mammography platform; high-efficiency magnetic resonance systems; an enterprise software solution that enables healthcare operations to electronically record patient demographic and clinical information; a bioreactor system for vaccine and other biotherapeutics production that uses disposable bags instead of stainless steel tanks for cell culturing; and a bottle made from plastic instead of glass for contrast media, the substances that are used to make structures and fluids in the body more visible in x-ray and other imaging.

For more GreenBiz.com coverage on greening healthcare, see Thera Kalmijn’s articles “Healthcare Heal Thy Footprint” and “Pharma and Medical Supply Leaders’ Rx for Greener Operations.”

Climate Corps 2010: Inside the Energy Efficiency Cubicle

I generally don’t like cubicles. Before I started my MBA at the George Washington University, I spent five years working at a cubicle. When I left my job in public accounting, I was relieved at the thought of abolishing cubicles from my life forever. But now as a 2010 EDF Climate Corps fellow at PHH Arval, I have never been so proud to have my very own cubicle. In fact, I don’t even call it a cubicle – this is now my workstation. I’ve even decorated it with EDF and Net Impact signs. I think the reason for my renewed enthusiasm for office life is that I have never felt more passionate about my work.

As an EDF Climate Corps fellow, I am responsible for making the business case for sustainability. I’m helping my host company, PHH Arval, simultaneously improve its bottom line while increasing environmental performance. This win-win situation is created by recommending projects that reduce energy usage and in turn lower utility bills in a commercial office building while cutting harmful greenhouse gas emissions.

PHH takes sustainability seriously. Their award-winning PHH GreenFleet program, for example, works with many of today’s leading transportation companies to encourage less fuel consumption, more efficient driving and the improvement of fuel economy for fleets. PHH also practices what it preaches. Through the dedication of an environmentally conscious facilities department and the commitment of a voluntary Green Team, PHH has already reduced electricity consumption by 20 percent in the past 5 years, obtained an EnergyStar rating that puts it in the top 25 percent of all office buildings in its class and is well on its way to meeting its Environmental Protection Agency Climate Leaders goal.

Even for such an environmentally responsible organization, I am finding that significant opportunities for lowering energy consumption still remain in all the primary areas of the office building. As I learned during EDF’s week-long Climate Corps training, “low-hanging fruit always grows back.” So, even for the most environmentally conscious organizations, a renewed look at energy consumption is bound to turn up new opportunities to save money as technology changes, cost barriers drop and new standards, regulations and incentives are offered.

After noting that an above-average amount of electricity usage at PHH is attributed to lighting, I’ve been analyzing several projects that I hope will reduce lighting costs:

* The installation of occupancy sensors in closed spaces
* Daylight harvesting to take advantage of the natural light that flows in through the wall-to-wall windows
* A review of nighttime and weekend lighting policies

I’m also reviewing the HVAC system and believe that the heating and cooling loads can be reduced through improvements to insulation, air sealing and window film. Computer Power Management software can also be installed to minimize energy waste from office equipment, and Vending Misers can be installed on all vending machines in the building.

Furthermore, I’ve been thinking about data centers. EDF organizes weekly expert calls by leaders in energy efficiency. On one of those calls, Don Beaty, a lead consultant for datacom facilities and designer for all Google data centers worldwide, explained that there is absolutely no reason for data centers to be cooled to a frigid 68 degrees or lower. Instead, ASHRAE environmental specifications allow for the intake temperature to be set as high as 80 degrees without risk to equipment and without impacting performance. Before the call took place, I reserved a conference room and invited the IT managers from PHH to attend. The message about temperatures in data centers immediately reached its intended audience from a very credible source. Now, I’m working with the energy-conscious IT department to increase the temperature in the data centers at PHH. I am currently working on quantifying the savings from this increase; which I believe will be substantial.

As this example illustrates, energy efficiency is easy money and good business. While there is no upfront cost of increasing the temperature set-point in a data center, some of the other projects I am considering do require an initial investment. Yet, by analyzing these projects from a financial perspective, just like a company does with any other investment they make, I am finding that these projects are smart business ventures with high returns, low risk and quick pay-backs. So, as a business student and environmentalist, I’m proud to sit at the energy efficiency cubicle, formed by the benefits these projects have on the environment, energy usage and to a company’s bottom line.

Jeremy Dommu is an 2010 EDF Climate Corps fellow at PHH Arval and a Net Impact member. He is an MBA candidate at the George Washington School of Business, George Washington University. This content is cross-posted at the Environmental Defense Fund Innovation Exchange Blog. Further coverage of the Climate Corps program is available at GreenBiz.com/edfclimatecorps.

Legrand Accelerates Development in Emerging Markets and Energy Efficiency by Acquiring Inform in Turkey

LIMOGES, France–(Business Wire)–
Regulatory News:

* Legrand (Paris:LR) takes control of Inform, the undisputed leader for UPS1 in
Turkey
* Legrand reinforces its presence in emerging markets and the promising energy
efficiency sector

Continuing its strategy of targeted acquisitions, Legrand today announced -
subject to the approval of Turkish competent authorities – the acquisition of
Inform, Turkey`s number-one contender in UPS1 and secured electrical equipment.

With this new move, Legrand is stepping up its expansion in emerging markets,
which have now returned to their pre-crisis growth rate. In 2010, they should
account for over 30% of consolidated sales, with margins in line with the group
average. Inform reinforces Legrand’s presence in Turkey, where the group already
has leading positions in wiring devices, power distribution and cable
management. Since its acquisition of Estap in 2008, Legrand has also been the
country’s uncontested leader in cabinets and enclosures for digital
infrastructures.

Moreover, the acquisition of Inform enables Legrand to accelerate its
development in energy efficiency, a fast-expanding market where group sales have
seen average growth in double digits for the past ten years, driven in
particular by steady innovation and the takeovers of Alpes Technologies, a
French leader in the optimization and measurement of electricity quality, and
Zucchini, a specialist in low-loss transformers in Italy and the leader in
prefabricated busbar systems.

Inform rounds out Legrand’s ranges with a secured electrical equipment offering
that includes UPS1 , voltage regulators, rectifiers, and static transfer
switches covering all market needs from low-power applications to sophisticated
solutions for industrial and IT applications. This comprehensive offering will
enable the group, building on its global presence in most major markets, to
accelerate expansion in the digital infrastructure and power distribution
sectors, where demand for reliable, secure electricity in both mature and
emerging markets is rising rapidly.

Based in Istanbul, Inform employs 360 people and generated sales close to $70
million in 2009, with an operating margin in double digits.

————————

Key financial dates

* 2010 first-half results: July 29, 2010
* 2010 nine-month results: November 4, 2010

ABOUT LEGRAND

Legrand is the global specialist in electrical and digital building
infrastructures. Its comprehensive offering of solutions for use in commercial,
industrial and residential markets makes it a benchmark for suppliers worldwide.
Innovation for a steady flow of new products with high added value is a prime
vector for growth. Legrand reported sales of €3.6 billion in 2009. The company
is listed on Euronext and is a component stock of indexes including the SBF120.
FTSE4Good, MSCI World and ASPI (ISIN code FR0010307819). www.legrandgroup.com

1 UPS: Uninterruptible Power Supply

Investor Relations:
Legrand
François Poisson
Tel: +33 (0)1 49 72 53 53
Fax : +33 (0)1 43 60 54 92
E-mail : francois.poisson@legrand.fr
or
Press relations:
Publicis Consultants
Vilizara Lazarova
Tel : +33 (0)1 57 32 86 46
Fax : +33 (0)1 57 32 85 84
E-mail: vilizara.lazarova@consultants.publicis.fr

Copyright Business Wire 2010

What Will it Take to Create a ‘Netscape Moment’ for Cleantech?

John Doerr, the brilliant and hard-charging venture capitalist (pictured left), has told me several times that cleantech is still awaiting its “Netscape moment.”

What he means, I think, is that investors will get excited about start-up companies across a range of so-called clean technologies — solar, wind, biofuels, energy efficiency, green chemistry, lighting — when one of them has an attention-grabbing initial public offering like Netscape’s in 1995 which, by some accounts, set off the Internet investing craze.

I don’t see a “Netscape moment” on the immediate horizon for cleantech but, of course, no one knew that the Internet browser company would take off before its IPO. But if we are to get the clean-energy transformation we need, enormous amounts of capital will be required. So any evidence that investors are warming to cleantech companies is welcome. I’ve seen several encouraging signs lately.

The first, of course, was Tesla’s electrifying IPO. (Sorry, couldn’t resist.) The stock, priced at $14 to $16 a share, climbed to nearly $24 on its first day before falling below $20 by week’s end. The investor enthusiasm, I’d guess, was more about the potential for the electric car industry than about Tesla. The company has piled up $290 million in losses and would be stalled were it not for a $465-million loan from the U.S. Department of Energy, which makes all of us investors in Tesla, in a way. It will need a lot more capital than the $226 million that it raised during its initial offering to produce cars at scale and make money. Tesla had sold only about 1,000 cars through March.

Still, electric cars are coming. BMW is getting serious about building one, as The Times reported last week. The paper quoted Kai Petrick, a BMW strategist, as saying: “The departure from fossil fuels is an irreversible trend.” The Chinese firm BYD is moving ahead, as are Chevrolet with its Volt and Nissan with the Leaf. Whether or not Tesla succeeds, money will be made in this sector and investors appear ready to jump in.

The second promising development is the fact that about $2 billion in investments went into 140 cleantech companies during the second quarter of 2010, according to the latest report on cleantech venture investments from the Cleantech Group and Deloitte. That’s about the same as the first quarter, and up by 43 percent from the very sluggish Q2 in 2009.

Some money is coming from traditional VCs but much is coming from big companies, who are more cautious in their investing approach; this is a sign that the startups have good prospects. Top deals included investments from Intel Capital, GE Capital, Shell, the Brazilian conglomerate Votorantim, the French power firm Alstom and Cargill Ventures. Utilities also stepped up their investments in wind and solar generation.

Scott Smith, Deloitte’s cleantech leader in the U.S., is quoted as saying:

The significant strengthening of corporate and utility investment into the cleantech sector, relative to 2009, is very encouraging, given the key role they will play in enabling broader adoption of clean technologies at scale.

Breaking the investments down by sector, the report says:

About $811 went to 26 solar companies including Solyndra (which withdrew its plans for an IPO), BrightSource Energy and Amonix, whose investors include Kleiner Perkins, where John Doerr and Al Gore are partners.

About $302 million went to 13 biofuels companies including Amyris Biotechnologies, another Kleiner Perkins portfolio company, and Virent Energy. Amyris, which makes malaria vaccines as well as biofuels, has filed for an IPO.

About $256 million went to 11 smart grid companies, including Landis + Gyr, OpenPeak and GreenWave.

!–pagebreak– Finally, I recently spoke to a cleantech analyst named Tim Sullivan, who works with an interesting website called Sharespost, which enables the buying and selling of shares in private, venture-backed companies, including those in cleantech. The sellers are primarily former employees of startups who want to unload their stock; the buyers must be so-called accredited investors, with a high net worth.

“People who have been with the company, investors or employees, may need liquidity,” Sullivan told me. “The financial markets are still in turmoil. It’s not a great time to have an initial public offering.”

Sharespost offers a window into what some buyers and sellers think private companies are worth. Tesla shares, for example, traded late in 2009 and early this year for between $4.75 and $9 a share, so the buyers did very well if they chose to sell their shares after TSLA went public last week.

Currently, you can find sellers offering shares of Nanosolar for $2 to $2.60 per share, giving the company an implied valuation of between $370 million and $481 million. Buyers, meanwhile, have offers outstanding for Solar City that value that company at between $240 million and $302 million. Silver Spring Networks, a Kleiner Perkins-backed smart grid company, has both buyers and sellers who value the company at $1.7 billion to $2 billion. Sharespost also offers free research and news on the companies that it tracks.

When I asked Sullivan to name a company that he thought was ready for an IPO, he mentioned Silver Spring. “Most of the large utilities are customers,” he said. “They are doing quite well from a revenue perspective.”

Sullivan identified three obstacles that are holding back cleantech companies. First, many are capital intensive. Second, they are policy-dependent and “politically, oil, coal and natural gas have a lot more muscle.” Third, they are complicated. “The thing about cleantech,” he said, “is that there are so many technologies, and they are so different from an engineering perspective and they have very different businesses.” Investors and analysts have a hard time understanding them.

So, as I said, cleantech isn’t ready yet for its “Netscape moment.”

And that may be O.K. Netscape set off a bubble, followed by a collapse. And Netscape itself? It was acquired by AOL and gradually withered away.

GreenBiz.com Senior Writer Marc Gunther is a longtime journalist and speaker whose focus is business and sustainability. Marc maintains a blog at MarcGunther.com. You can follow him on Twitter @marcGunther.

UPS’s Green Shipping Program Goes Global

United Parcel Service is expanding its carbon neutral shipping program to 35 countries and territories in Europe, Asia and the Americas following the launch of the service last fall in the United States.

Under the program, shippers in the U.S. can offset the carbon footprint of their packages by paying a small fee that covers cost of the offsets, emissions calculation and administration: Five cents for a ground package, 20 cents for an air package and 75 cents for an international package. Outside the U.S., the flat fee varies slightly depending on the country of origin and the destination of the package and the service selected by the shipper.

In the U.S., program expansion includes availability to all shippers using UPS.com; customers using UPS CampusShip, a service for firms with multiple locations; retailers that use UPS in their e-commerce operations; and UPS stores. A contract version of the program also is available to customers who want to offset all their UPS shipments. (A chart on the program and a map of the expanded service are below.)

A rollout of the expanded program begins July 12 starting with the services to UPS online customers large and small, the contract offering and availability in company’s 35 largest international markets. The program is expected to be available to UPS stores by early August, said UPS Marketing Director Rimas Kapeskas.

UPS is matching offset purchases up to $1 million through 2010.

Introduced in October and the first service of its kind in the country, the program was initially available on a comparatively limited basis.

“It gave us a chance to test out the whole carbon off-setting process,” Kapeskas said. “We got good strong feedback from those customers and it gave us the confidence to expand.”

Some of that feedback came from came from long-time UPS customer TOTO USA, which in June became the first major company to adopt the program as part of its energy efficiency supply chain initiative. TOTO projects that it will ship 75,000 carbon neutral packages in its first year of participation in the UPS program.

“We use less and recycle more than any other plumbing manufacturer,” TOTO USA spokesperson Lenora Campos said in a statement. “TOTO is proud to be the first company worldwide to incorporate UPS’s carbon neutral initiative into its small package supply chain.”

The third-party verification and certification UPS’s program was major plus for TOTO, the company said.

UPS’s methodology and processes for its carbon calculations are verified by Société Générale de Surveillance, the inspection, verification, testing and certification company that also validated the delivery company’s assessment process for the Eco Responsible Packaging Program introduced in April. UPS’s carbon offset process is certified by The CarbonNeutral Company, and its calculator is based on Greenhouse Gas Protocol.

UPS has purchased offsets from the Garcia River Forest Climate Action Project, which is overseen by The Nature Conservancy and The Conservation Fund. In the future, the firm is looking to make offset purchases in other regions around the world, Kapeskas said, adding that the firm will focus on offsets that are certified by the Gold Standard, Voluntary Carbon Standard or the Climate Action Reserve. The offsets will be retired according to industry standards.

S.Korea SK Group says to invest $14.3 bln by 2020

SEOUL, July 1 (Reuters) – South Korea’s SK Group, whose major businesses are crude oil refining and telecom via SK Energy (096770.KS) and SK Telecom (017670.KS), said on Thursday it would invest 17.5 trillion won ($14.32 billion) by 2020 to develop energy resources and technologies.

The group also said in a statement that it would strengthen its global businesses mainly in China, South America, Middle East and Southeast Asia.

Of the total investment, the group would spend 4.5 trillion won to secure low-carbon energy, including solar, bio fuel and rechargeable battery, along with overseas natural resources such as oil, gas, iron ore and rubber, it said.

The group, via this overseas resource development, aims to raise its contribution to energy independency rates of South Korea, the world’s No.5 crude oil and No.2 liquefied natural gas

(LNG) buyer, to 13 percent by 2013 from 6 percent in 2008.

SK Energy said last month it would focus on exploration and production (E&P) of oil, and research and development (R&D) of energy by doubling the success rate of exploration to 20 percent and enhancing E&P business through various strategies, while enhancing its Chinese businesses. [nSGE65K026]

According to Thursday’s statement, SK Group would focus on developing crude oil, LNG and iron ore in South America, and petroleum, coal, rubber along with enhancing its telecom infrastructure business in Southeast Asia.

In the Middle East, the group said it would work on construction business of power-generating facilities and plants.

Of the total investment, 4.2 trillion won would be to establish “smart” environment, like a smart grid to raise energy efficiency via computerised monitoring of electricity flowing through a power grid, the statement said.

It added the remainder of the investment would go for developing innovative technologies, such as for bio businesses.

($1=1222.1 Won)

(Reporting by Cho Mee-young; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)

((meeyoung.cho@thomsonreuters.com; +82 2 3704 5653; Reuters Messaging: meeyoung.cho.reuters.com@reuters.net))

((If you have a query or comment on this story, send an email to news.feedback.asia@thomsonreuters.com)) Keywords: SKGROUP KOREA/

(C) Reuters 2010. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution ofReuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expresslyprohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuterssphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group ofcompanies around the world.nTOE66003F

Fireman’s Fund Offers Insurance Discount to Energy Star Buildings

Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company is offering a 5 percent discount to policyholders with Energy Star buildings in the latest expansion of the firm’s green insurance coverage.

Just last week, Fireman’s Fund introduced several new endorsements for policyholders who have made energy efficiency and other environmental upgrades to their property.

The new offerings include Green Financial Incentive Coverage for policyholders who paid for green improvements to their property with help from a tax incentive, financial grant or a similar benefit — but then suffered a loss to that upgrade and are obligated to refund the incentive they received.

The expanded coverage and the discount for Energy Star buildings come as Fireman’s Fund approaches the fourth anniversary of the launch of its green building insurance for commercial properties.

Fireman’s Fund was the first carrier to broadly offer such coverage in the U.S. commercial marketplace. The firm followed that 2006 debut with the introduction of green insurance for homeowners in July 2008 and the establishment later the same year of its Green RiskAdvisor program.

The company’s green insurance for commercial property includes offerings that cover:

* Certified green buildings.
* Green renovations and upgrades to existing buildings.
* Rebuilding traditional structures to green standards following a loss.
* Rebuilding certified buildings to the next highest certification level following a loss.
* Any post-loss upgrade to real and personal property that “more efficiently uses energy or water, improves human health or reduces the impact on the environment.”

The firm’s discount for Energy Star buildings is “groundbreaking in its recognition of the greater value and lower risks of energy efficient buildings,” Alyssa Quarforth, program manager for Energy Star Commercial Properties at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said in statement announcing the program yesterday.

She added the discount provides “another tangible financial benefit to owners and operators of top-performing buildings, in addition to the reduced energy costs that they are already realizing.”

The Energy Star program estimates that the buildings that have earned its label as a result of efficiency measures generally use 35 percent less energy and emit 35 percent less carbon dioxide than average buildings. There are now more than 10,000 Energy Star buildings in the United States. The program provides free online sources to help property owners and managers improve the energy efficiency of their buildings.

Through its Green RiskAdvisor program, Fireman’s Fund consultants can help customers benchmark energy and water use with Energy Star’s Portfolio Manager and assist them in using the insurance company’s tools to manage environmental risks.

Major Australia investors urge quick action on climate

(Reuters) – A group of major investors on Friday urged Australia’s new Prime Minister Julia Gillard to take swift action to fight climate change and cut carbon emissions blamed for heating up the planet.

Green Business | COP15

Gillard should outline her road map on climate change as soon as possible and set priorities for consensus building over the issue, said the Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC) that represents institutional investors with more than $500 billion under management.

“We consider that climate change presents real risks to the Australian economy, which must be addressed,” the group said in a statement.

Gillard moved to revive a stalled carbon trading scheme on Thursday, within hours of becoming prime minister after incumbent Kevin Rudd stepped down. Opinion polls had shown a slump in support for Rudd and he was also unpopular within his own party.

Gillard pledged more consultation with industry and voters to win support for a price on carbon pollution, an issue that has split the nation.

Rudd had championed the carbon trading scheme but it was rejected by a hostile Senate for a third time in March.

His decision in April to shelve the scheme till 2013 angered voters who wanted action on climate change and was a major reason for the plunge in his popularity in opinion polls.

IGCC said its members would continue to support strong climate change policy action but neither the government or the main opposition party had an adequate policy to address risks to the Australian economy from global climate change.

Australia is the world’s top coal exporter and among the highest per-capita emitters of planet-warming carbon dioxide, with coal used to generate about 80 percent of electricity.

While the government has embraced renewable energy and energy efficiency, analysts say putting a price on carbon emissions is the most effective way for Australia to cut greenhouse gas pollution.

“We see indications of significant policy progress in China, Europe and in many U.S. states and do not accept that stalled international progress is sufficient reason for further policy delay in Australia,” said IGCC chief executive Nathan Fabian in the statement.

U.N. climate talks on a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, whose first phase ends in 2012, have bogged down and agreement on a broader pact covering all of the world’s major greenhouse gas emitters is now thought to be more likely by the end of 2011.

(Reporting by Bruce Hextall; Editing by David Fogarty)

Energy Star Helps Automakers Cut 750K Tons of CO2

An Energy Star program aimed at increasing the energy efficiency of manufacturing plants has helped the auto industry cut the amount of electricity and fuel needed to make vehicles, slashing greenhouse gas emissions by 750,000 tons.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency created the Energy Star Energy Performance Indicator (EPI) program to set benchmarks for energy efficiency at manufacturing plants and develop a way for companies to compare their performance to others in their industry and share efficiency information.

The first EPI for auto plants was released in 2006, using data from 2000. Due to demand from the auto industry for more recent data, an updated version of the EPI was developed with 2005 data from 33 plants from six companies in the U.S., and Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions took a look at the data gathered by the EPI to see how efficiency changed.

In a report on the EPI program, “Assessing Improvement in the Energy Efficiency of U.S. Auto Assembly Plants,” (PDF) the Nicholas Institute found that electricity use per vehicle at the best in class plants improved by 2 percent and fuel use per vehicle improved by 12 percent, leading to CO2 reductions of about 348,000 tons (696 million pounds).

The range of fuel use efficiency also narrowed, showing that plants that had been lagging are catching up to the leading plants, resulting in an additional CO2 reduction of 383,000 tons (766 million pounds). Altogether, the program saw CO2 emissions from auto plants reduce by nearly 750,000 tons (1.5 billion pounds).

The EPA has created or is developing EPIs for over 20 other industries, with updates to its EPIs for cement manufacturing and wet corn refining in the works. Plants evaluated for an EPI are scored on a range of 1-100, with scores around 50 considered average and scores of 75 or higher considered efficient.

GE to Invest $10B More in Ecomagination R&D by 2015

General Electric is committing $10 billion to ecomagination research and development in the next five years after reaching a $5 billion investment milestone for its portfolio of environmentally sensitive products, services and technology.

GE, the world’s largest industrial company, announced the new goal today with the release of its annual ecomagination report. The 50-page report details the firm’s progress in 2009 toward a series of ambitious environmental goals that were set in 2005 — when the company launched ecomagination — and include increasingly higher benchmarks for performance.

The report highlights the company’s accomplishment of surpassing its goal for ecomagination R&D investment by hitting the $5 billion target in 2009, a year early. The commitment to double the investment in the next five years means that GE plans to put a total of $15 billion toward ecomagination by 2015 when the initiative marks its 10th anniversary.

GE also reported:

* A 6 percent increase in revenue, bringing it to $18 billion in 2009 for more than 90 products. There were just 17 products when ecomagination launched and about 80 were in place by the end of 2008. GE hailed the 2009 sales figure, pointing out that revenue rose despite persisting challenges in the economy. The growth was modest, however, compared to the 21 percent jump recorded in 2008.

For coming years, the company is reframing its stretch goal for revenue, which in 2005 was set at $20 billion in ecomagination sales by 2010 and then was bumped up in last year’s report to $25 billion by 2010. GE says it is well on its way to the $20 billion mark in sales and is now committing that “ecomagination revenue will grow at twice the rate of total company revenue in the next five years, making ecomagination an even larger proportion of total company sales [as illustrated in the chart below].”

* Reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improved energy efficiency of operations. GE reduced its GHG emissions by 22 percent last year compared to 2004. GE improved its energy intensity by 34 percent compared to 2004; its goal was a 30 percent reduction by 2010. GHG intensity also improved by logging a 39 percent reduction compared to 2004. Goals for 2015 include improving energy intensity of operations by 50 percent and reducing absolute GHG emissions by 25 percent when compared against a 2004 baseline.

* Reduced water use. The company cut water consumption 30 percent compared to a 2006 baseline. Its original goal was 20 percent by 2012.

The company also pledged to maintain its engagement with the public and said it will update ecomagination.com to foster the dialogue.

GE summarized its progress and ongoing goals in this chart:

Ecomagination offerings range from energy efficient smart appliances for the home to high-performance engines for industry, and GE investments in projects and technology to generate and save energy span everything from solar power systems to using cow manure to produce biofuel.

The firm’s commitment to boost its ecomagination R&D investment reinforces its strategy to bet big on cleantech as Kevin Skillern, managing director of Venture Capital for GE Energy Financial Services, outlined in a podcast interview with GreenBiz Senior Writer Marc Gunther last fall.

In the report today, the company noted:

“Global energy use continues to grow, while interest in renewable energy is at an all-time high. World demand for electricity is expected to double by 2030, driven in part by the increased needs of developing nations.”

“Ecomagination is one of our most successful cross-company business initiatives. If counted separately, 2009 ecomagination revenues would equal that of a Fortune 130 company and ecomagination revenue growth equals almost two times the company average,” GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt said in a statement. “We have made bold investments in ecomagination research and development and it has resulted in strong returns for shareholders.”

The 2009 and previous ecomagination annual reports are available at www.ge.ecomagination.com/report/.