India, US to discuss terror, Pak at strategic dialogue

Continuing with their deepening ties, India and US will hold their first Strategic Dialogue next week and will discuss a plethora of issues, including the security situation in the region and cooperation in countering terrorism.

The Strategic Dialogue, to be held on June 3 in Washington, will cover 18 sectors, including energy and climate change, education and development, strategic cooperation and science and technology. The Indian side will be led by External Affairs Minister S M Krishna while US will be represented by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The Strategic Dialogue will focus on a wide range of bilateral, regional and global issues of shared interest and common concern. It would give direction to the programmes currently under implementation and take initiatives to further the Indian and US developmental, security and economic interests, External Affairs Ministry spokesman Vishnu Prakash said here on Sunday.

The two sides will discuss the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the issue of continuing support of terror groups by Islamabad is also expected to come up at the dialogue which will also lay the ground for President Barak Obama’s visit to India in November.

Interestingly, the dialogue will take place at a time when Indian investigators will be in the US to question David Coleman Headley.

It (the dialogue) will focus on a wide range of bilateral, regional and global issues of shared interest and common concern. It would give direction to the programmes currently under implementation and take initiatives to further the Indian and US developmental, security and economic interests, Prakash said.

The dialogue will be based on the joint statement that was issued after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met Obama in Washington in November. Currently our interaction, our exchanges, our dialogue is being undertaken in eighteen areas comprising of five pillars of cooperation, under the Strategic Dialogue. These are: strategic cooperation; energy and climate change; education and development; economic, trade and agriculture; and lastly science, technology, health and innovation, the spokesperson said.

The two sides will also seek to operationalise the Obama-Singh Knowledge Initiative that aims at increasing University linkages, faculty exchanges and cooperation in the education sector. Talks will also be held on ways and means to increase cooperation in agricultural research, human resource capacity development and natural resource management.

The Indian delegation will include HRD Minister Kapil Sibal, Minister of State for Science and Technology Prithviraj Chavan and Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao. From the US, National Security Adviser James Jones, Commerce Secretary Gary Locke and Education Secretary Arne Duncan will be present.

Q+A – Where does China stand on Iran sanctions?

Iran’s top nuclear negotiator is heading to China for talks on Thursday as Western governments become increasingly confident that Beijing will back sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear activities.

WHAT IS CHINA’S GENERAL POSITION ON SANCTIONS?

China has long said sanctions are not an effective tool to solve diplomatic disputes, and its diplomats have often repeated that line in answering questions about Iran.

That position partly reflects Beijing’s resentment of Western sanctions it has faced, especially after the 1989 armed crackdown on pro-democracy protests around Tiananmen Square.

It also chimes with China’s stance of “non-interference” in other nations’ domestic affairs, a position that has often amounted to wanting to insulate its economic interests from diplomatic disputes.

But Beijing has backed previous rounds of U.N. sanctions against North Korea and Iran over their disputed nuclear activities. China this year also threatened to put unilateral sanctions on U.S. firms selling weapons to Taiwan, the self-ruled island that Beijing claims as its own.

Since the 1990s, China has cast itself as a responsible supporter of nuclear non-proliferation safeguards.

That desire to be a respected global player and not be isolated from dominant international opinion could weigh in favour of China allowing fresh sanctions against Iran, especially with Russia indicating it may back sanctions.

HOW WILL CHINA HANDLE THE NEW SANCTIONS PUSH AGAINST IRAN?

China is one of five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council with the power to veto any proposed resolution.

While Beijing sometimes abstains from Security Council votes on decisions it dislikes, it is much less willing to use its veto and risk diplomatic isolation, especially if fellow Security Council member Russia backs a resolution.

China is more likely to use its influence to draw out negotiations on sanctions and try to thwart any measures that could threaten its energy and economic ties with Iran, as it has done before.

In July 2006, China backed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1696 that threatened sanctions on Iran, and in December of the same year it supported Resolution 1737, which imposed sanctions on Iranian nuclear imports and exports.

It supported two further resolutions, one in 2007 which broadened the sanctions to cover a ban on Iranian arms exports, and another in 2008 which criticised Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment.

Each time, however, Beijing has worked to rein in Western demands for tougher restrictions on Tehran.

A draft sanctions document circulated by Western powers a few weeks ago proposes restricting more Iranian banks abroad, but does not call for sanctions against Iran’s oil and gas industries.

WHY IS CHINA OPPOSED TO STRICT ECONOMIC SANCTIONS?

Beijing sees Iran as an important oil supplier and trade partner and as a major strategic actor in the Middle East, where China is buying growing volumes of oil. There is scant chance of China risking those ties by backing expansive economic sanctions.

China is the world’s No. 2 crude oil consumer, behind the United States. Iran has the world’s second-largest crude oil reserves, but needs investment to develop them.

In 2009, Iran was China’s third biggest source of imported crude oil. But in the first two months of 2010, China imported 2.53 million metric tonnes of Iranian crude oil, a drop of 37.2 percent compared to the first two months of 2009.

That made Iran the fourth-ranked foreign source of crude for China so far this year, behind Russia, Angola and top supplier, Saudi Arabia.

China is also an investor in Iranian oil and gas, and Chinese state-owned energy conglomerates have been exploring for new fields there, with an eye to expanding their stake.

Industry sources have said China has been selling gasoline to Iran, which lacks refining capacity to meet domestic demand. Chinese customs statistics do not record any shipments, which may go through intermediaries.

(Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

One dead, two injured in Athens bomb blast: Police

Mon, Mar 29 09:46 AM

A powerful bomb exploded in front of an institute for training public officials in the west of Athens, killing a 15-year-old boy and injuring a girl and her mother, police said.

The boy was killed on the spot while his 10-year-old sister was seriously wounded and their mother escaped with slight injuries in the blast which occurred shortly before midnight yesterday.

Police said the family, Afghan nationals, were probably walking past the building when the explosion took place.

The girl was rushed to a nearby hospital in critical condition after the bomb placed in a bag went off without warning in the city’s busy Patissia district at 10:50 pm (local time).

Greek anti-terrorism police cordoned off the area.

Attacks on public buildings and businesses are relatively frequent in Athens and the northern city of Salonika, but rarely injure anyone as there are usually warning calls that allow police to clear the area.

The last attack to have injured anyone was in October 2009, when six police officers were wounded in a machine gun attack on a police station.

Greece has been rocked by a string of attacks against economic interests and offices of politicians since a youth was killed by a police officer in December 2008.
Agencies

Asian countries should engage each other more proactively: Singapore Minister

New Delhi, Mar 20(ANI): Visiting Singapore’s Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong on Saturday said that Asian countries should now start engaging each other more proactively.

Addressing the Asia Society Corporate Conference in the national capital, Tong, who is in India on a two-day official visit, said that cooperation between the countries would go a long way in facilitating a new global architecture revolving around Asia.

“Stability in the relations between the major powers, such as between the US and China, as well as between China and India, will continue to be key. There will always be inherent tensions in these great power relationships as they compete for influence, markets, and resources,” Tong said.

“But there are also built-in stabilizers in the growing interdependence of countries in a globalized and deeply interconnected world,” he said.

He also said that reordering of the global power structure was inevitable as Asia continues to grow, and for the region to make the most of the new order, major and emerging powers would need to learn to adjust and accommodate each other.

“The European Union is not the benchmark for the eventual shape of the regional architecture in Asia. Instead, regional architecture in Asia will be much more fluid with many overlapping layers and mechanisms in order to accommodate the disparate political, cultural and economic interests in the region,” Tong added. (ANI)

Vatican’s Good Friday to focus on Christian persecutions in India

Vatican City, April 7 (DPA) The faithful will be invited to reflect on the persecution of Christians in India in prayers at this year’s traditional Good Friday Way of the Cross ceremony at Rome’s Colosseum, the Vatican said Tuesday.

Pope Benedict XVI is set to preside the evening ceremony – also known as Via Crucis – which commemorates Jesus’ final hours, including his crucifixion.

Archbishop Thomas Menamparampil of Guwahati, India, has been given the task of writing the meditations for this year’s Via Crucis which will focus on ‘evil in the world, on pain and on the various forms of suffering,’ the Vatican said.

‘In this context, he (Menamparampil) will also refer to Christians who suffer persecution in India and in other countries, as well as to the violence that destroys ethnic and religious groups, and to conflicts fuelled by economic interests,’ the Vatican said.

Violence aimed at Christians have increased in India in recent years including in the eastern state of Orissa, which witnessed widespread anti-Christian violence after the Aug 23, 2008 murder of Hindu leader Laxmananda Saraswati an attack police blamed on

Maoist rebels.

Nearly 40 people, mostly Christians, were killed in the Hindu-Christian violence in the state that continued over two months.

The Vatican notes how for the ‘second consecutive year, the Pope wishes to draw attention to the continent of Asia’ given that last year the Way of the Cross prayers then penned by Hong Kong’s Cardinal Joseph Zen Ze-kiun also focused on the ‘persecutions the Catholic Church faces in various part of the world.’

Parliament’s nod will be mandatory for international agreements: BJP

New Delhi, April 3 (IANS) Describing the Indo-US nuclear deal as done in ‘regrettable secrecy’ by the Congress-led UPA, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) said if voted to power it would bring in a constitutional amendment to make parliamentary approval mandatory before the government signs any international agreement that concerns strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interests.

In its party manifesto, released here Friday, the BJP said: ‘In view of the uncalled for and regrettable secrecy with which the Congress and the prime minister dealt with the India-US nuclear deal, the BJP proposes to introduce an amendment to the constitution to make it mandatory for government to seek parliament’s approval/ratification by two-thirds majority before signing any bilateral or multilateral agreement that impinges on India’s strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interest.’

It said the country needs nuclear energy, ‘but not at the cost of our national strategic interests. The Congress has fooled the people of India by selling the over-hyped India-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement as an absolute necessity and how it will help light up people’s homes.’

The UPA government had signed the deal by ‘suppressing two crucial facts’, it said. First, the government ‘did not make the smallest effort to tap India’s own nuclear fuel supplies’, and second, nuclear power is ‘tremendously expensive and not affordable for the aam admi’.

‘The India-US nuclear deal, in the final analysis, is not about empowering India but disempowering India by making us dependent on American supplies and tying us to discriminatory regimes from which Pakistan is free.

‘The BJP believes that India’s strategic nuclear programme has been deeply compromised by the Congress. The gains of Pokhran-II and subsequent development have been frittered away for gains that have accrued to those who wish to see India’s nuclear programme to be contained, rolled back and eventually dismantled.’

The BJP promised to ‘reverse this drift’.

It said India’s indigenous thorium technology programme will be expedited and given financial assistance, ‘correcting the grievous wrong done by the UPA government’.

It said if voted to power, the BJP will honour India’s commitments to prevent proliferation. ‘But it will pursue an independent nuclear policy based on the following:

1. All options will be kept open and all steps will be taken that are necessary for the

technological advancement of India’s civil and military nuclear programmes.

2. Maintain a credible minimum deterrent that is in tune with changing realities.

3. Seek cross-party consensus before agreeing to any control regime, including CTBT,

FMCR and MTCR.’

BJP for parliamentary approval for international agreements

New Delhi, April 3 (IANS) Parliamentary approval should be made mandatory before the government signs any international agreement that concerns strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interests, the Bharatiya Janata Party ahs advocated.

The Indo-US nuclear deal was done in ‘regrettable secrecy’ by the Congress-led UPA, the BJP Friday said.

The party manifesto, released here Friday, said: ‘In view of the uncalled for and regrettable secrecy with which the Congress and the prime minister dealt with the India-US nuclear deal, the BJP proposes to introduce an amendment to the constitution to make it mandatory for government to seek parliament’s approval/ratification by two-thirds majority before signing any bilateral or multilateral agreement that impinges on India’s strategic programmes, territorial integrity and economic interest.’

It said the country needs nuclear energy, ‘but not at the cost of our national strategic interests. The Congress has fooled the people of India by selling the over-hyped India-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement as an absolute necessity and how it will help light up people’s homes.’

It said the UPA government had signed the deal by ‘suppressing two crucial facts’. First, the government ‘did not make the smallest effort to tap India’s own nuclear fuel supplies’, and second, nuclear power is ‘tremendously expensive and not affordable for the aam admi’, it said.

‘The India-US nuclear deal, in the final analysis, is not about empowering India but disempowering India by making us dependent on American supplies and tying us to discriminatory regimes from which Pakistan is free.

‘The BJP believes that India’s strategic nuclear programme has been deeply compromised by the Congress. The gains of Pokhran-II and subsequent development have been frittered away for gains that have accrued to those who wish to see India’s nuclear programme to be contained, rolled back and eventually dismantled.’

The BJP promised to ‘reverse this drift’.

It said India’s indigenous thorium technology programme will be expedited and given financial assistance, ‘correcting the grievous wrong done by the UPA government’.

It said if voted to power, the BJP will honour India’s commitments to prevent proliferation. ‘But it will pursue an independent nuclear policy based on the following:

1. All options will be kept open and all steps will be taken that are necessary for the

technological advancement of India’s civil and military nuclear programmes.

2. Maintain a credible minimum deterrent that is in tune with changing realities.

3. Seek cross-party consensus before agreeing to any control regime, including CTBT,

FMCR and MTCR.’

Vietnam devalues currency by widening trading band

Hanoi – Local analysts were divided on the reasons for Vietnam’s decision to widen the trading band of the dong against the US dollar from 3 per cent to 5 per cent effective Tuesday.

The move effectively devalues the dong against foreign currencies. The government reference rate remained unchanged from Monday to Tuesday at 16,980 dong to the dollar, but the wider trading band allowed banks to raise their rates from 17,489 to 17,700 dong to the dollar.

The government, which controls the exchange rate through its State Bank, had been widely expected to devalue the dong to promote Vietnamese exports.

But economist Vu Thanh Thu Anh, research director at the Fulbright Economic Training Program in Ho Chi Minh City, said Tuesday’s move was not related to export promotion.

“The most difficult problem for exporters is that they do not have a market,” Anh said. “When they do not have markets, devaluing the dong becomes meaningless.”

Anh said the widening of the trading band was a response to the government’s decreased ability to defend the dong’s value, as its foreign currency reserves have been hit by falling industrial exports and low prices for Vietnam’s crude oil.

Tran Du Lich, director of Ho Chi Minh City’s Institute for Economic Research, disagreed.

“I do not think Vietnam is under any pressure leading to expanding the trading band,” Lich said.

Lich said the government was broadening the band as part of a long-term policy of gradually letting the dong float against foreign currencies. He said the move came despite the risk that a lower dong could hurt Vietnam’s economic interests.

“Vietnam is an outsourcing country, so a high exchange rate will put exporters in a difficult situation” because the price of imported components will rise, Lich said. “Moreover, Vietnam owes a lot of money to foreign countries, so a weak dong will make it harder for Vietnam to pay its debt.”(dpa)

Muslims in Ghazipur protest against al-Qaeda

Ghazipur, Feb 12 (ANI): Muslims in Ghazipur staged a demonstration against the recently announced al Qaeda’s threat to India.

They burnt effigies of Abu al-Yazid and al Qaeda Chief Osama Bin Laden and warned the al Qaeda against threatening India.We are protesting against the terrorists. We have burnt their effigies. Whenever they’ll make such statements, we will protest against it. We will give a strong reply back to them, ” said Gauhar, a protestor.

On Tuesday Al-Qaeda Commander Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, in Afghanistan had warned India of more attacks like the one on Mumbai, and said its economic interests would be targeted if it retaliates against Pakistan.

Ironically, Yazid was declared killed by Pakistan in an army operation in August 2008.

Abu al-Yazid has been referred to as al Qaeda’s third most senior figure, after the elimination or capture of five earlier occupants of the number three spot since 2001.

The September 11 Commission described Abu al-Yazid as the network’s “chief financial manager”. He is an Egyptian and served for sometime in jail with al Qaeda deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri after the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981.

India has repeatedly said it is keeping all options open despite Pakistan’s denials on the Mumbai attacks, raising the possibility of Indian attacks on what it sees as militant targets in Pakistan. (ANI)