Australia PM puts economy at heart of re-election

July 15 (Reuters) – Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard sought to sell her Labor government’s economic credentials on Thursday, warning that the conservative opposition’s policies could risk a robust economy.

In her first major economic speech since becoming prime minister on June 24, Gillard set out her platform for re-election at polls expected within months, centering on job creation.

“I believe a strong economy is the foundation of everything else that as prime minister I want for this great country of ours,” Gillard told the National Press Club in Canberra.

“As prime minister I will make my economic judgments based on what gives Australians the best opportunity for access to work.”

The government, on course for a narrow election victory according to opinion polls, tweaked its economic forecasts on Wednesday, predicting robust commodity prices due to Chinese demand will ensure the budget returns to surplus in 2012/13, far ahead of most other rich nations.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For Reuters Poll Tend [ID:nSYU010167]

For updated economic forecasts [ID:nSGE66D04I

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

It also forecast unemployment would fall to 5 percent in 2010-11 and 4.75 pct in 2011-12.

Gillard said the economy had emerged from the global financial crisis stronger than many other developed nations due in part due to the government’s A$52 billion ($46 billion) stimulus package in 2009.

“I say to the Australian people, now is not the time to take risks with the Australian economy,” said Gillard, Australia’s first female prime minister who appears far more at ease dealing with the media than her predecessor Kevin Rudd.

“It is a time for prudent and careful economic management, not a time to take risks with a Liberal Party that got it wrong on the global financial crisis, that opposed (stimulus) action to support Australian jobs and that would have allowed hundreds of thousands of jobs to be destroyed.”

Gillard said a new mining tax, which is forecast to raise A$10.5 billion in revenue from 2012, would fund a cut in corporate tax and a rise in pensions but would be dumped by conservative leader Tony Abbott if he was elected.

“Remarkably, my opponent would deny Australians these benefits because he is refusing to accept the tax that our biggest mining companies have agreed to pay,” she said.

PM SELLS ECONOMIC CONSERVATISM

Economic management is traditionally a major issue in Australian elections. And while Australia’s healthy economy, in its 17th year of growth, should be a winning ticket for the government, voters still believe the opposition has the edge in economic management, according to opinion polls this week.

The opposition, which ruled for 12 years before Labor was elected in 2007, is also committed to achieving a budget surplus, and has said it would put downward pressure on interest rates, cut debt and cap spending.

But it differs from the government over its opposition to a new mining tax and a planned carbon price to fight climate change.

Despite her left-wing background, Gillard has sold herself as an economic conservative, dismissing concerns her government would be an old-style, big-spending Labor administration.

Gillard said growth in spending would be capped at 2 percent a year once the economy was growing above trend.

She also said Australia could not rely solely on its resource sector for future economic prosperity, warning doing so could create a two-speed economy of haves and have nots.

“Australia today is a great beneficiary of the economic growth in China and the demand for our mineral resources in our region. But if anyone thinks that gives us a free ticket to easy prosperity, they are mistaken,” she said.

She said a re-elected Labor government would push for micro-economic reforms to ensure Australia remained a competitive and modern economy, but also provided social dividends.

“The microeconomic challenges of the future are not a simplistic choice between the market and the state,” said Gillard.

“Simply applying the extreme free-market medicine of liberalisation and privatisation without thought or care is not a solution. Maintaining an instinctive hostility towards the public sector and all it provides is equally wrong.” ($1 = 1.131 Australian Dollar) (Editing by Ed Davies and Sugita Katyal)

Abbott makes economic pitch

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has pitched his economic credentials to voters, vowing the next Coalition government will not bow to any resistance against economic reforms.

He also signalled the Coalition may support the Government’s $50 billion hospital takeover plan and says he will release a workplace relations policy “soon”.

In a speech that was light on policy detail but strong on attacks against Government “waste”, Mr Abbott said the overriding priority of the Coalition was to return the budget to surplus.

“Just as Bob Hawke was prepared to argue for floating the dollar and John Howard was prepared to argue for the GST, the next Coalition government must be prepared to argue for necessary reform against the power of vested interests and people’s mistrust of change,” he said.

“Reform can’t be avoided if prosperity is to be secured.”

Mr Abbott said the only economic legacy the Government could lay claim to was that it rolled back the workplace relations reforms of the past two governments.

He ridiculed many of the Government’s spending programs, such as the home insulation program, as a “parody of productive work” and said the global financial crisis was an excuse to spend more.

“GroceryChoice was set up and shut down at a cost of $10 million and the National Broadband Network’s $43 billion investment was announced without even a business plan,” he said.

Mr Abbott pledged all policies would be fully costed and released well before the next election.

He reiterated the Coalition would keep spending below 25 per cent of GDP and would sell Medibank Private to help pay off debt.

Mr Abbott said while the Opposition would continue to oppose the emissions trading scheme and the private health insurance rebate changes, it would “not necessarily” block the hospitals funding takeover, as long as it was not “a great big bureaucracy”.

During last week’s leaders’ debate Mr Rudd accused Mr Abbott of being too negative about the Government’s planned health overhaul.

But Mr Abbott defended his actions, saying it was the Opposition’s job to do so.

“The Opposition can’t avoid sounding negative sometimes because it’s their duty to try to stop or improve poor policy,” he said.

Mr Abbott said he would release the Coalition’s workplace relations policy “soon” and while it would not be the “son of WorkChoices”, it would seek to “restore the balance”.

Before Mr Abbott’s speech today, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was already on the attack, warning voters Mr Abbott could not be trusted.

“He said that the Liberal Party, under his leadership, would not introduce any new taxes,” Mr Rudd said.

“Five weeks later, Mr Abbott brought about his great big new tax to fund his version of a paid parental leave scheme.”

Tony Abbott on the run

Tony Abbott lost the Great Health Debate this week. Going all-out negative against a prime minister that had a plan – maybe not much of a plan, but a plan nevertheless – was the wrong call.

After looking like a strong Opposition Leader and keeping the Government on the hop for months he suddenly looked distinctly “un-prime ministerial” when invited to share the leaders platform alongside Kevin Rudd at the National Press Club this week.

But two days later he’s put that loss of momentum behind him and lost no time in acting decisively to reshuffle his frontbench after the resignation of Nick Minchin.

The decision to move Barnaby Joyce from the finance portfolio was the correct one. He should never have given him the job in the first place and he can’t blame Labor for what he describes as an undeserved attack on the finance shadow.

Senator Joyce brought himself undone all on his own. In trying to pin Labor as the party of debt and deficit he went too far too often, warning that Australia was at risk of defaulting on its debts, and sometimes appearing to move beyond his understanding of the economy and the economic terms within – “gross net debt public and private???”

This made him an easy target, diverted the Opposition from its attacks on the Government on matters like the insulation rollout and along the way it weakened the Opposition’s economic credentials.

So when the chance to reshuffle presented itself today, Tony Abbott took it.

And the Opposition Leader is right – Senator Joyce is a talented politician who will inflict damage on the Labor Government now that he’s free “to get out from behind his desk and travel right around the country spruiking the Labor debt message”. Shadow minister for regional affairs is just the portfolio for doing that, and to start causing trouble for Labor in a swag of regional and rural seats across Queensland and New South Wales in particular.

Barnaby Joyce is strong on politics and weak on policy.

Andrew Robb by contrast is the opposite. He’s not the retail politician that Barnaby Joyce is but he’s a safe pair of hands in the finance portfolio with a strong policy background thanks particularly to his work for the last few months drawing together the Coalition’s policies for the next election.

The perfect background for the pre-budget, pre-election shadow ERC process.

So with the shadow finance ministry sorted that just left one remaining elephant in the room – Malcolm Turnbull.

The former Liberal leader, hurt and hollowed out after being dumped by his party, has spent the past months trying to decide whether to stay in the Parliament and recontest his marginal seat of Wentworth or to move on now that the leadership was out of his grasp.

In recent days he’s signalled he wanted to come in from the cold – back to the frontbench and presumably back after the election.

This was always going to be tricky for Tony Abbott. A big call to offer the man he rolled from the top job a senior economic role on his team but a big call for him not to too.

In the end it seems Tony Abbott has said no to Malcolm Turnbull.

The Opposition Leader said the two men had several discussions, but in the end it was a matter of timing, Tony Abbott deciding it was untenable to have Malcolm Turnbull there as a senior frontbencher when the ETS was brought back into the Senate again in May.

Decoded this suggests that Malcolm Turnbull would not pledge to support shadow cabinet policy to vote against the ETS when the bill came up again.

And how could he give such a promise? He was the man of principle who crossed the floor on this bill last time mounting a devastating attack on his own party’s climate policies along the way. Tony Abbott couldn’t risk a repeat performance – this time from a senior position on the frontbench – in May, just a few months out from an election.

Earlier in the day, New South Wales Liberal leader Barry O’Farrell made a pitch for Malcolm Turnbull to be resurrected to the shadow ministry arguing on Radio National Breakfast that “Turnbull would give grunt and heft to the parliamentary team”.

He would, it’s’ true, and it does seem as though that’s what he now wants to do. It also looks like his leader, the man who took his job by just one vote, has promised Malcolm Turnbull a senior job on the frontbench – after the election.

Of course if Kevin Rudd calls a double dissolution election and wins he’ll presumably bring the Emissions Trading Scheme back yet again to be passed by a joint sitting of Parliament.

That means Malcolm Turnbull will have to vote, yet again, with his conscience and against his party. Delaying, yet again, his return to the frontbench.

Fran Kelly is a presenter on the ABC’s Radio National Breakfast program.

Joyce shunted in Coalition reshuffle

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has dumped Barnaby Joyce from the finance portfolio, replacing him with Andrew Robb.

Mr Abbott was forced to make the reshuffle just four months into his leadership after Senator Nick Minchin yesterday quit the frontbench and announced he would not contest the next election.

Announcing the changes, Mr Abbott said Senator Joyce had been a “first-class member” of the Coalition team.

“I think that really I’m very lucky to have Barnaby in the frontbench,” he said.

“I think this is a really excellent position for him.

“I want him to be right around Australia. I didn’t want him necessarily chained to a desk costing policies.”

Just yesterday Mr Abbott said Senator Joyce was doing an “outstanding job” in the finance portfolio.

Senator Joyce took up the finance position after Mr Abbott became leader last December, but the often outspoken Senator was seen by some as a risk to the Coalition’s economic credentials.

He will now be spokesman for regional development, infrastructure and water.

And Ian Macfarlane will take on energy and resources.

Senator Minchin’s resignation yesterday also ignited speculation that former leader Malcolm Turnbull would make a frontbench return.

But Mr Abbott says that is not on the cards for now.

“Should we win the election I would anticipate offering Malcolm a senior role,” he said.

“But given that the emissions trading legislation is still before the Parliament I thought it would be premature to bring Malcolm Turnbull back to the frontbench.”

Outspoken senator

There had been speculation Senator Joyce would be moved after criticisms of his performance in the finance portfolio following a series of gaffes.

In a speech to the National Press Club, the Nationals Senator confused millions with billions while discussing the country’s debt levels and once referred to “net gross public and private debt”.

He was also ridiculed by the Government for claiming that Australia could be forced to default on its debts.

And today Queensland Senator Ian Macdonald publicly urged Mr Abbott to consider using Senator Joyce in another portfolio.

Speaking just moments after Mr Abbott’s announcement, Senator Joyce accused some of his own colleagues of backgrounding the media against him.

But he said Mr Abbott did not tell him to go.

“It was an open and honest, frank discussion, which was completely cordial,” he said.

When asked if he was disappointed by the move he replied: “Not really”.

“It’s an increase in workload, to be perfectly truthful,” he added.

Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner was quick to seize on news of the reshuffle to attack Mr Abbott’s economic credibility.

“It took the resignation of a senior member of the Coalition due to personal circumstances to force Mr Abbott to remove Barnaby Joyce from the role,” he said in a statement.

“This demonstrates just how little Mr Abbott cares about the Australian economy by allowing Senator Joyce to retain one of the senior economic positions within the Coalition for more than four months.”

Senator Joyce will still represent the finance portfolio in the Senate.

Mr Robb last year served as the Coalition’s emissions trading spokesman before moving to the backbench because he was suffering from depression.

After Mr Abbott became leader last December Mr Robb took charge of the Coalition’s policy development committee.

Mr Robb says that after five months without a portfolio he is “well and ready to take such responsibilities”.

Mr Robb paid tribute to Senator Minichin and described Senator Joyce as a “significant and effective member of the Coalition”.

“I enjoy a strong working relationship with Barnaby and look forward to his leadership in the regional development, infrastructure and water portfolio,” he said.