Mirwaiz proposes, Omar doubts

Srinagar, June 5 — What might have been a positive step by the Hurriyat on the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Jammu and Kashmir has been somewhat offset by a note of disquiet expressed by Chief Minister Omar Abdullah. Jammu and Kashmir separatist outfit All Parties Hurriyat Conference (moderate) said on Saturday the group had never ruled out dialogue with the Centre on what the constitutional status of the state should be.And, just two days ahead of the Prime Minister’s visit to the state on Monday, Abdullah expressed doubts on Saturday on the genuineness of encounters reported from the line of control. The context of Abdullah’s statement is the three killings in the fake encounter in Machil, 65 km north of Srinagar, by the Army. “The Jammu and Kashmir police have been flooded with complaints questioning the genuineness of encounters, all of which are being reinvestigated,” Abdullah said. The statement has come just days after three families from Nadihaal in north Kashmir said the boys the Army called militants were their relatives and not terrorists. Abdullah criticised the lack of transparency in the Army, stressing that “they act as the judge, the jury and the executioner in the state”. In an exclusive interview on Saturday, Hurriyat Chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said: “The Hurriyat never closed its doors to dialogue, but the dialogue needs some substance and sustainability.”

“It is for the Prime Minister to repeal draconian laws such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act and also address the issue of human rights with commitment to honour them.” the Mirwaiz said.

Australia on internet enemy watchlist

A top media rights watchdog has listed Australia along with Iran and North Korea in a report published on countries that pose a threat of internet censorship.

Paris-based media rights group Reporters Without Borders (RSF) put Australia and South Korea on its list of countries “under surveillance” in its Internet Enemies report.

Australia was listed for the Federal Government’s plan to block access to websites featuring material such as rape, drug use, bestiality and child sex abuse. Critics say the plan is a misguided measure that will harm civil liberties.

In South Korea, the RSF report added, “draconian laws are creating too many specific restrictions on web users by challenging their anonymity and promoting self-censorship.”

“These countries are worrying us because they have measures that could have repercussions for freedom of expression on the internet,” RSF secretary general Jean-Francois Julliard said at an internet rights award ceremony.

Russia and Turkey were also added to the watchlist, which is a category below RSF’s top “Enemies of the Internet”, the countries it considers the 12 worst web freedom violators.

These include Saudi Arabia, Burma, China, North Korea, Iran and Vietnam.

“The world’s largest netizen prison is in China, which is far out ahead of other countries with 72 detainees, followed by Vietnam and then by Iran, which have all launched waves of brutal attacks on websites in recent months,” RSF’s report said.

A senior manager of US internet giant Google, David Drummond, said there was an “alarming trend” of government interference in online freedom, not only in countries that are judged to have poor human rights records.

He cited Australia’s plans as an example, saying that there “the wide scope of content prohibited could include socially and politically controversial material.”

The Australian case “is an example of where these benign intentions can result in the spectre of true censorship,” he added, speaking at Thursday’s ceremony.

“Here in Europe, even in France, at this very moment, some are tempted by this slippery path of network filtering.”

- AFP

Formation of regulatory authority only after consultation with industry: Soni

New Delhi, Aug 26 (ANI): Information and Broadcasting Minister Ambika Soni has said that a regulatory mechanism would be formed for broadcasting only after consultations with stakeholders

Soni assured the broadcasters that the industry’s larger interests would be taken into consideration while forming the mechanism.

” Some ground rules are needed. But no laws would be imposed on broadcasters,” Soni said.

Addressing a seminar of broadcasters Soni informed the media that the I and B Ministry is holding consultations with broadcasters on the nature of the regulatory authority.

“I don’t see why broadcasters should have apprehensions about content regulation. I would like to categorically say that the government does not want to put draconian laws on electronic media.”

She said the consultations with the broadcasters are not taking place with any pre-conceived notion and expressed hope that a positive outcome will emerge from the consultation.

” As channels operating in the country are increasing it is difficult to monitor all of them, therefore the proposed authority will also measure impact of these channels,” Soni said. (ANI)