Fini ally warns Berlusconi as confidence votes loom

(Reuters) – Italy’s Gianfranco Fini, the increasingly dissenting co-founder of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s party, has enough support to bring the government down, a Fini ally warned Saturday.

Fini has publicly challenged Berlusconi’s policies and leadership style in recent months, fuelling speculation he might lead a faction against the embattled premier.

Comments published Saturday by Fini associate Italo Bocchino will add pressure on Berlusconi, who faces two confidence votes in parliament — the first is expected on July 15 — on an unpopular 25-billion euros austerity budget.

Berlusconi has said that he would resign, as required by the constitution, if he lost the votes.

Asked by independent news outlet CNR Media how many followers could Fini count on, Bocchino said in a video interview: “At least one more than the number needed to keep the ruling coalition afloat.”

The Italian media were quick to pick up on signs of a widening rift between Fini and Berlusconi. Bocchino later said his words, which were posted on CNR Media website (www.cnrmedia.com), were misinterpreted.

He said in a statement Fini’s backers were “decisive” to keep the government going and would vote with the ruling coalition “until the last day of the legislature.”

Ever since Fini and Berlusconi publicly clashed at a party congress in April, there has been much speculation about whether dissenters within Berlusconi’s People of Freedom party had the numbers to deprive him of his parliamentary majority.

Il Giornale newspaper, which is owned by the Berlusconi family, calculated this week that without Fini and his allies, the government could count on 316 votes in the lower house of parliament — a majority of just one vote.

In the Senate, Il Giornale said that the center right without Fini and his allies had a five-vote majority at 162, but that did not include seven life senators, all of whom are former heads of state or otherwise distinguished public figures.

Fini, who is speaker of the lower house, and Berlusconi have exchanged regular barbs through the media, fuelling speculation that their enmity could destroy the coalition and force the appointment of a new government or snap elections.

The rivalry has leaked into the battle Berlusconi faces to push through parliament the austerity package designed to shore up Italy’s public finances.

The package, including spending freezes and pay cuts in the public sector, faces opposition from groups ranging from the unions to cash-strapped regional governments, with critics saying it bleeds workers and spares the rich.

Even diplomats have called a strike against the measures.

Berlusconi’s approval rating fell nine points to 41 percent over the past six weeks, according to a survey in Corriere della Sera daily this week, and his government appears more vulnerable than it has been since it took office in May 2008.

Two ministers have resigned in as many months over corruption accusations, while protests have been growing over a draft bill that would limit the use of wiretaps by police and punish newspapers that print transcript leaks.

(Editing by Matthew Jones)

Residents rally against nursing home privitisation

There is still hope of keeping a Leeton nursing home in state management, despite no commitment from the Health Minister.

About 30 Leeton residents rallied outside Parliament yesterday and later the Upper House passed a Greens’ motion calling on the Government to scrap plans to sell the Carramar Nursing Home.

The motion was passed on voices, with no dissenters.

Neil Boardman from the Carramar Carers Group says Health Minister Carmel Tebbutt gave them a good hearing.

But he says there has been no commitment so there will be a follow-up rally in Leeton next week.

“Well we’ll still be running a rally in our town to keep Carramar as is,” he said.

“We won’t stop putting the pressure on.

“We’ll continue to try letters until the decision’s handed down and just try and make sure they do understand where we’re coming from on the issue and the effect it’s going to have on our town.”

Mr Boardman says the Minister told them the tender process has two weeks to run and it cannot be stopped.

“We felt strongly that she could see that there’d be a detrimental effect on our community and this just wouldn’t be acceptable of any government to actually put a town in a disadvantaged position, especially out in the country where we’re coming from with such good services we’ve got,” he said.

Late yesterday the Member for Murrumbidgee, Adrian Piccoli, asked Ms Tebbutt a question in Parliament about the nursing home’s sale.

Ms Tebbutt says non-government providers are well placed to give care but the concerns of Leeton residents are understandable.

“Our top priority is to make sure that quality care for residents continues to make sure that there is minimal disruption during any transfer that might take place and Mr Speaker these are important guarantees to residents and their families,” she said.

“We understand that these are nursing homes that provide important services.

“The reason why the State Government is transferring state-owned nursing homes to the non-government sector is because of the depth of experience of non-government providers makes them well placed to provide quality care to residents.”

Twitter diplomacy

US state department sends a delegation of tech luminaries, including world’s most popular tweeter Ashton Kutcher, to Moscow in an attempt to use technology to improve relations.

Call it geek diplomacy. This week, in lieu of the congressmen and capitalists who typically make up delegations to Russia, Washington sent a detachment of Silicon Valley dreamboats: the 33-year-old creator of Twitter; the “chief lizard wrangler” of Mozilla ; the chief executive of eBay; and — for good measure — the actor Ashton Kutcher, who has edged out Britney Spears to become the world’s most popular Tweeter.

The approach is an unorthodox one, punctuated by such strange moments as Kutcher’s tweeted discovery of a Siberian man whose arm bore a large tattoo of his face. But it indicates how seriously Washington takes online networking as a social force. Among the delegation’s goals was to persuade Russia’s thriving online social networks to take up social causes like fighting corruption or human trafficking, said Jared Cohen, who serves on secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton’s policy planning staff.

“These platforms are more than just ways to make money — they’re affecting the lives of people for better or for worse,” Cohen said. “As that realisation takes hold, it’s just a natural human thing. People want to steer it toward the good rather than the negative.”

Russia has already developed the world’s most active social networking audience, with the average adult spending 6.6 hours a month on networking sites, according to the market research company comScore, which is based in Virginia. The government makes little effort to censor the web, which has become a key platform for dissenters like Major Alexei Dymovsky, who last November posted videos saying that the police were under pressure to fabricate charges.

The projects proposed by the delegation were neutral by comparison: a cellphonebased program to assist new mothers; a “safe jobs index” to protect women from human trafficking; and jobs tailored to deter young programmers from becoming hackers. The delegation also encouraged high-tech entrepreneurs to join with social activists, though in Russia, the two groups inhabit different worlds, said Esther Dyson of EDventure Holdings, a member of the delegation.

To many in business, social activists “have lost touch with what is going on,” said Dyson, who has been investing in Russian companies for 20 years. “Their attitude is kind of like: ‘We don’t think that stuff was effective. We’re entrepreneurs. It’s not relevant to us.’ They don’t identify with these heroes of the past.”

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed article last week, Evgeny Morozov chided the State Department for indulging in “techno-utopianism,” the notion that social networking has a natural democratising effect. On the contrary, he argued, crowds mobilised online tend to be chaotic and riven by internal debates , while repressive governments use the same platforms, often anonymously, to distribute propaganda.

He also warned delegations like the one in Moscow tie the platforms too closely to Washington. “The kind of message that it sends to the rest of the world — ie that Google, Facebook and Twitter are now just extensions of the US state department — may endanger the lives of those who use such services in authoritarian countries,” wrote Morozov, a Belarussian and the author of an coming book about the internet and democracy. “It’s hardly surprising that the Iranian government has begun to view all Twitter users with the utmost suspicion.”

The British Empire was terrified of Punjab’s last Maharani

London, May 25 (ANI): It has now been revealed that at the height of its power in the middle of the nineteenth century, the British Empire was wary and quite terrified of Punjab’s last Maharani (Queen), Jind Kaur, who was the fourth wife of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.

That fear, according to The Independent, came to an end on August 1, 1863, shortly after 6:15 in the evening, when a frail and partially blind Jind Kaur died in her bed on the top floor of a Kensington townhouse.

Fifteen years earlier, Jind Kaur, had encouraged the Sikh Empire to wage two disastrous wars against the British which led to the annexation of the Punjab and to her being torn from her son, Duleep Singh, when he was just nine-years-old.

Adopted by a dour colonial surgeon, Duleep swiftly shed his Punjabi customs, converted to Christianity and moved to England to live the life of a respectable country squire, shooting grouse on his estate and hosting decadent parties for Britain’s Victorian elite.

The “Black Prince”, as he was known in London, became firm friends with Queen Victoria, only to fall from grace after he was caught trying to persuade Russia to invade India and return his kingdom to him. His tale has been well documented.

But now for the first time a British historian, Peter Bance, who publishes his findings this week in the book Maharajah Duleep Singh – Sovereign, Squire And Rebel, has uncovered his mother’s remarkable life.

While researching a tome on the Duleep Singh family, which lived in exile on a sprawling country estate near Thetford, Norfolk, Bance stumbled upon the gravestone of Jind Kaur in the catacombs of the Kensal Green Dissenters’ Chapel.

Historians had assumed that the Maharani’s cremation occurred in India but here was a simple white marble tombstone in London with her name on it.

As cremation was illegal in Britain at the time it appears that the Maharani’s remains were kept in the chapel for nearly a year while Duleep arranged for her to be taken home.

The astonishing relic of a person who made no secret of her dislike for the country where she eventually died lay hidden for more than a century.

Bance told The Independent: “It’s an amazing find because Jind Kaur was only buried in Britain for little over year and yet someone went to the trouble of creating this very ornate gravestone for her.”

“The inscription is partly in English and partly in the Sikh Gurmukhi script and what makes it unusual is that very few people in Britain at the time would have been able to translate Gurmukhi, let alone carve it into marble. She is the first documented Sikh woman in Britain.” Bance adds.

To say that Jind Kaur was a thorn in the side of the East India Company would be an understatement. She was born into humble origins, the daughter of the Royal Kennel Keeper at the Sikh court in Lahore, but she was ravishingly beautiful and soon caught the attention of the Punjab’s greatest ruler, the one-eyed Ranjit Singh.

Having kept the British at bay for decades, Ranjit’s empire began to crumble with his death in 1839. Following a series of bloody succession battles, Jind emerged as regent for Duleep who was less than a year old when his father died.

Concerned about the instability (and attracted to the kingdom’s fabulous wealth) Britain began preparing to take the Punjab, goading the Sikh armies into two wars that eventually led to the disappearance of an indigenous Asian empire that stretched from the Khyber Pass to Kashmir.

Jind was instrumental in organising the Sikh resistance, rallying her generals to return to battle and plotting rebellion once the British finally took over the Punjab in 1849.

To halt her influence on the young Duleep, the Punjab’s new colonial masters dragged the Queen away from her son and imprisoned her.

The British press began a smear campaign against the Maharani, labelling her the “Messalina of the Punjab”, portraying her as a licentious seductress who was too rebellious to control.

In a final act of defiance Jind Kaur escaped her jailers dressed as a slave girl and trekked 800 miles to Nepal where she was given begrudging asylum and a place in Sikh folklore as a national hero.

She was only allowed to see her son 13 years later when he returned to Kolkata for a tiger-hunting trip. Duleep asked to bring his mother from Kolkata to England. The British Government decided the last Queen of the Punjab no longer posed a threat and gave him permission.

But a number of historians now believe it was Jind Kaur’s brief reunion with her son in the country she despised that rekindled Duleep’s desire to take back his kingdom.

In the end, Duleep’s attempts to persuade the Tsar of Russia to invade India backfired spectacularly because British spies had followed his every move. Publicly humiliated, Duleep lived his final years in a Paris hotel room desperately seeking the forgiveness of Victoria. (ANI)

YC Dissenters Burn Rahul Gandhi’s Effigy In Surat

Here is a wake-up call for the Congress party in Gujarat.

A group of Youth Congress members burnt an effigy of AICC general secretary Rahul Gandhi in City Light area of Surat on Sunday morning.

These members charged Rahul for selecting wrong people to oversee the recently held Youth Congress elections in Surat.

It is learnt that the activists, led by Rajesh Jain, who was a candidate for the elections from the Majura gate constituency and lost the polls after garnering just five votes shouted slogans against Rahul Gandhi.

The effigy was also garlanded with the shoes by these members.

Speaking on this, an irritated Rajesh said, “I am a victim of corruption. The Congress leaders have done great injustice to me. There is no meaning of such election which was clearly rigged. Rahul Gandhi talks about free and fair elections but that seems just a talk and not reality. We are greatly disappointed by Ashok Tanwar and Rahul Gandhi.”

Meanwhile, many party leaders had condemned the incident and have urged the high command to suspend Jain from the party.

Senior Congress leader Salim Ghadiyali said, “We have also made a recommendation to the Umra police inspector to take strict action against Jain for violating the model code of conduct. His getting just five votes might have driven him to take the step.”