Court acquits Chandraswami in FERA case

New Delhi, June 5 — A Delhi court, on Saturday, acquitted self-styled godman, Chandraswami, in a 14-year-old Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) case. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had accused the godman of violating the FERA terms in a defamation suit filed by him 26 years ago.

Additional Metropolitan Magistrate A.K. Pandey said the ED failed to establish that the “accused Nemi Chand Jain alias Chandraswami had the knowledge about deposit of the money (6,000 Euros) in a defamation suit filed by him in 1986 in London against Lakhu Bhai Pathak.” Counsel for Chandraswami, Santosh Chauriah, said, “They did not know exactly who paid the money on his behalf.

President Patil to take decision on Afzal Guru”s mercy petition: Sheila Dikshit

New Delhi, May 21 (ANI): Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit on Friday said President Pratibha Devisingh Patil would take the decision on the mercy petition of Afzal Guru, an accused in the Parliament attack case.

Dikshit said the file pertaining on the Afzal Guru case had been sent to both the Ministry of Home Affairs and the office of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, and added that their replies are awaited.

“All orders given by the Supreme Court will be followed. However, at the same time, Guru”s wife has moved a mercy petition to the President of India. The file related to the case is with the Home Ministry and the office of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi,” said Dikshit.

“Clearly, I am not in a position to decide Guru”s fate. Then what comment can I give?” she told the media persons, while attending a blood donation camp organized to commemorate the death anniversary of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday protested against the delay by the Delhi Government in giving its opinion on the mercy petition moved by Afzal Guru, to show that this case was one of terrorism alone and had nothing to do with any community in particular.

Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly V.K. Malhotra also criticised the Delhi Government for delaying the hanging of Afzal Guru due to vote bank politics.

Despite dithering by the government on the question of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru”s hanging, Congress on Wednesday made it clear that it favoured such a step at an early date.

“If the Supreme Court convicted Afzal Guru in the Parliament attack case giving him death sentence, there should be no problem in hanging him,” party general secretary Digvijay Singh.

Congress Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi had said the concerned authorities within the government should decide the matter.

Guru was awarded death sentence by a Delhi court on December 18, 2002 after being convicted of conspiracy to attack Parliament on December 13, 2001, waging war against the country and murder.

Delhi High Court upheld the death sentence on October 29, 2003 and his appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court two years later on August four, 2005.

Following this, Afzal filed a mercy petition with the President, who forwarded it to Union Home Ministry for its comments.

The Union Home Ministry had sent the file to Delhi Government”s Home Department for its comments, as per the laid out procedure.

The 2001 Indian Parliament attack, led to the death of a dozen people; five terrorists, six policemen and a civilian. It also caused increased tensions between India and Pakistan resulting in the 2001-2002 India-Pakistan standoff.

On that day, a group of gun-and grenade-wielding terrorists who stormed the seemingly impregnable Parliament House premises, were stopped dead in their tracks by security men as the nation watched in disbelief. (ANI)

Delhi Govt. backs SC’s verdict on Afzal Guru

New Delhi, May 18 (ANI): Faced by Bharatiya Janata Party’s criticism of the Congress party, the Sheila Dikshit-led Delhi government on Tuesday decided to back the Supreme Court’s verdict to hang Afzal Guru, an accused in the Parliament attack case.

However, while backing the SC’s verdict, the Delhi government has reportedly maintained that it will need to examine the law and order implication in case Afzal was hanged, an NDTV report quoted sources as saying.

The Delhi government has been sitting on the file for nearly four years and the capital punishment awarded to Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab in the Mumbai attacks case brought the issue under fresh focus.

Guru was awarded death sentence by a Delhi court on December 18, 2002 after being convicted of conspiracy to attack Parliament on December 13, 2001, waging war against the country and murder.

The death sentence was upheld by Delhi High Court on October 29, 2003 and his appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court two years later on August four, 2005.

A sessions court also fixed the date of his hanging on October 20, 2006 in Tihar jail.

Following this, Afzal filed a mercy petition with the President, who forwarded it to Union Home Ministry for its comments.

The Union Home Ministry had sent the file to Delhi Government”s Home Department for its comments, as per the laid out procedure.

The 2001 Indian Parliament attack, led to the death of a dozen people; five terrorists, six policemen and a civilian). It also caused increased tensions between India and Pakistan resulting in the 2001-2002 India-Pakistan standoff.

On that day, a group of gun-and grenade-wielding terrorists who stormed the seemingly impregnable Parliament House premises, were stopped dead in their tracks by security men as the nation watched in disbelief. (ANI)

Hurriyat leader Geelani in custody for violating house arrest

Srinagar, Apr 30 (ANI): All Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC) leader Sayyed Ali Shah Geelani was taken into custody by Jammu and Kashmir Police on Friday afternoon for violating house arrest norms.

Geelani was placed under house arrest following his call to march on the UN office in the city.

The hardline faction of the APHC had given call for the march in protest against the Delhi Court’s verdict on the 1996 Lajpat Nagar blast case, which sentenced three of the accused to death.

Police, had told Geelani not to move out of his house on Wednesday.

The APHC has condemned Geelani’s house arrest, describing it as an undemocratic act of the ruling National Conference. (ANI)

CBI remand of Medical Council of India chief extended to May 1

New Delhi, Apr.29 (ANI): A Delhi court has extended the Central Bureai of Investigation (CBI) remand of Medical Council of India (MCI) President Ketan Desai till May 1.

Three other accused – J P Singh, Sukhvinder Singh and Kawaljeet Singh – have also been remanded to CBI custody till May 1.

Desai was arrested for allegedly granting recognition to medical colleges in lieu of money.

Continuing its raids, the CBI in Mumbai seized diamonds and gold worth Rs.38 lakh from bank lockers of Desai.

The CBI also recovered property documents, including that of a shop and an office space in posh Andheri area of Mumbai.

The CBI also found that Desai and his family own five vehicles, including three high-end ones– a Toyota Camry, Honda City and Hyundai Sonata.

Desai was arrested for allegedly receiving Rs.2 crore as bribe from a Punjab-based Medical College for giving sanction to enroll students for year 2010-11 though they lacked adequate infrastructure. (ANI)

Delhi Court to hear Bofors pay-off case today

New Delhi, Sep 8 (ANI): A Delhi court will hear the Bofors payoffs case against Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi today. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) may reveal its course of action following the withdrawal of Interpol’s Red Corner Notice against him.

The matter is to come up for hearing before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Kaveri Baweja.

During the brief hearing on April 30, Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra, appearing for CBI, had informed the court that the Red Corner Notice issued against Quattrocchi was withdrawn in November last year.

The ASG had also sought two months time to decide on the future course of action in the politically-sensitive case on the court’s query as to what options were left with the probe agency following the withdrawal of the Red Corner Notice.

The Bofors scandal was a major corruption scandal in India in the 1980s, when the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and several others were accused of receiving kickbacks from Bofors AB for winning a bid to supply the Indian Army with 155 mm howitzer guns.

The court had on February 10, 1997, sent letters to Malaysia and the UAE seeking the arrest and extradition of Quattrocchi.

The CBI had registered the FIR in the Bofors case on January 22, 1990, three years after Swedish Radio on April 16, 1987, claimed that A B Bofors, the makers of the 155 mm howitzers, had paid kickbacks to top Indian politicians and key defence officials to secure the Rs 1,437 crore gun deal.The contract between the Indian government and the Swedish Company for the supply of 400 field guns was signed on March, 24, 1986. (ANI)

No change in CBI’s clean chit to Amod Kanth in Uphaar Cinema fire case

New Delhi, Aug.29 (ANI): Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Saturday stood by its probe report in a Delhi court on giving clean chit to former Indian Police Service officer Amod Kanth in the 1997 Uphaar fire tragedy case in which 59 people died of asphyxia.

“There is nothing to suggest any criminal intention on the part of Amod Kanth as alleged by the Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT),” the probe agency, in its reply to the protest petition of the AVUT, said.

District and Sessions Judge S P Garg said the judicial records of the case be filed for deciding the matter and adjourned it for September 15.

Seeking dismissal of AVUT’s petition against the clean chit to the former IPS officer, the investigative agency CBI said: “No criminal case is made out against any of the officials other than the persons already chargesheeted.”

Kanth, the then Deputy Commissioner of Delhi Police (Licencing), had allegedly allowed retention of 37 extra seats in the theatre in 1979 in violation of the Cinematography Act.

It consequently blocked the exits at the balcony of the theatre where movie watchers died of asphyxia as they could not go out when fire engulfed the hall. (ANI)

Delhi court rejects Abu Salem’s plea on dropping MCOCA charges

New Delhi, Aug 28 (ANI): A Delhi court on Friday dismissed the plea of city police to drop charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) against underworld don Abu Salem in an extortion case lodged here in 2002.

Delhi Police had filed an application under the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code for withdrawal of the MCOCA charges against Salem on the ground that it was against the condition for his extradition agreed to between India and Portugal.

The Centre had asked Delhi police to move the court in this regard after Salem had approached the High Court at Portugal alleging that Indian authorities were acting in contravention of the extradition terms.

Salem who was arrested in India after his extradition from Portugal in November 2005, was booked under the MCOCA for allegedly making extortion calls to a Delhi-based businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002, demanding Rs five crore as protection money.

He is convicted for the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case and killing of music baron Gulshan Kumar 1997.

In March 2006, a special TADA court filed eight charges against him and his alleged associate Riaz Siddiqui for his role in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case. He stands accused of ferrying and distributing weapons.

Salem is currently in high-security Arthur Jail in Mumbai. (ANI)

Suspected Lashkar terrorist remanded to police custody

New Delhi, Aug 26 (ANI): A suspected Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) terrorist, who was arrested from the New Delhi railway station, was remanded in police custody for 14 days by a Delhi Court on Wednesday.

“Accused is prayed for custodial interrogation for the purpose of obtaining further inputs. He is to be taken to Aurangabad. His previous involvement in the cases in Maharashtra and Gujarat are to be ascertained so he is sent to police custody till September 9,” the court said.

27-year-old Mohd Aslam alias Saleem was produced before Metropolitan Magistrate Manish Yaduvanshi.

The prosecution submitted that Aslam was allegedly carrying explosives in sweet boxes to be delivered to his associates in Aurangabad.

A resident of Jammu and Kashmir, Aslam was found carrying two kg of RDX, a Pakistani passport, handbag and briefcase. (ANI)

Two ex-President Bodyguards get life term in Budha Jayanti Park gang rape case

New Delhi, Aug 22 (ANI): A Delhi court on Friday sentenced two former members of the President’s Bodyguard to life imprisonment in connection with the 2003 Budha Jayanti Park rape case.

The court also sentenced two other convicts to ten years each in prison.

On August 17, Additional Sessions Judge S.K. Sarvaria held Harpreet Singh, Satyender Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Manish Kumar of the elite President’s Bodyguard guilty of gang rape, kidnapping and robbery under the various provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Of four convicts, Satender and Harpeet who were convicted of gang rape, abduction and robbery will get life imprisonment, while Kuldeep and Manish, who were convicted for abduction, robbery and common intention, have been sentenced for ten years of imprisonment.

The court acquitted Kuldeep and Manish, of the charges of gang rape.

The victim, a 17-year-old student of the Delhi University, had gone with her friend to the park – which is located near Rashtrapati Bhavan on October 6, 2003.

The prosecution alleged that Harpreet and Satender raped her while the other two kept guard.

The incident shocked the national capital six years ago.(ANI)

Court to pronounce quantum of sentence to Budha Jayanti Park gang rape convicts today

New Delhi, Aug 22 (ANI): A Delhi court will pronounce the quantum of sentence to four members of the President’s Bodyguard in connection with the Buddha Jayanti Park gang rape case today.

On August 17, at the Patiala House Court, Additional Sessions Judge S.K. Sarvaria held Harpreet Singh, Satyender Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Manish Kumar of the elite President’s Bodyguard guilty of gang rape, kidnapping and robbery under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Of the four convicts, Satender and Harpeet have been convicted of gang rape, abduction and robbery. Though the court acquitted Kuldeep and Manish, of charges of gang rape, they were convicted them for abduction, robbery and common intention.

The victim, a 17-year-old student of the Delhi University, had gone with her friend to the park – which is situated near Rashtrapati Bhavan on October 6, 2003.

The prosecution alleged that Harpreet and Satender raped her while the other two accused, Kuldeep and Manish, kept guard.

The four first roughed up the victim’s friend and then took her to a secluded place inside the park before raping her, the prosecution alleged.

The incident shocked the national capital six years ago. (ANI)

Charges of extortion framed against Abu Salem

New Delhi, July 7 (ANI): A Delhi court on Tuesday framed charges of extortion and criminal conspiracy against underworld don Abu Salem in connection with the Rajat Nagrath extortion case.

Salem, who was brought from Bhopal, was produced before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Kaveri Baweja.

The court ordered the trial of Salem under Sections 387 (extortion), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code.

Salem’s counsel, Arvind Shukla, claimed that there were not enough evidences to frame charges against him. He moved a bail application, which will be considered on July 14.

However, the prosecution said there was a “positive” forensic report of the intercepted calls of Salem, which is sufficient ground for his trial.

The trial against Salem will begin with the recording of witnesses statements from July 21.

In 2003, thee other accused-C P Rai, Istiyaq Ahmed and Sadiq Aliin- have already been charged in the case.

All the accused, including Salem, have been booked for making threat calls to Rajat Nagrath, owner of Delhi-based Allied Communication demanding Rs. one crore in 2002.

Salem was arrested in India after his extradition from Portugal in November 2005 for his alleged role in the 1993 Mumbai blasts and several other cases.

He is convicted for the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case and killing of music baron Gulshan Kumar 1997.

In March 2006, a special TADA court filed eight charges against him and his alleged associate Riaz Siddiqui for his role in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case. He stands accused of ferrying and distributing weapons.

Salem is currently in high-security Arthur Jail in Mumbai. (ANI)

Hearing on Bofors case extended till September 8

New Delhi, Apr 30 (ANI): A Delhi Court on Thursday postponed the hearing of the Bofors pay off case till September 8 after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought two months time to decide its future course of action on the lone surviving suspect, Ottavio Quattrocchi.

The CBI on Tuesday had requested Interpol to remove the Italian businessman’s name from its list of most wanted persons.

Filing the status report before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Kaveri Baweja, the CBI’s counsel, Additional Solicitor General P. P. Malhotra, informed the court that the Red Corner Notice issued against Quattrocchi was withdrawn in November last year.

Malhotra contended that efforts to extradite Quattrocchi from Argentina have been unsuccessful because of various reasons and it did not seem achievable in the near future too.

However, Malhotra made certain that the CBI is keeping all options open and would need two months to consider them.

“It is stated that during the course of investigation, the Red Corner Notice was recalled. Extradition proceedings have not been completed for various reasons,” Baweja said.

The Bofors scandal was a major corruption scandal in India in the 1980s, when the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and several others were accused of receiving kickbacks from Bofors AB for winning a bid to supply the Indian Army with 155 mm howitzer guns.

The court had on February 10, 1997, sent letters to Malaysia and the UAE seeking the arrest and extradition of Quattrocchi.

The CBI had registered the FIR in the Bofors case on January 22, 1990, three years after Swedish Radio on April 16, 1987, claimed that A B Bofors, the makers of the 155 mm howitzers, had paid kickbacks to top Indian politicians and key defence officials to secure the Rs 1,437 crore gun deal.
The contract between the Indian government and the Swedish Company for the supply of 400 field guns was signed on March, 24, 1986. (ANI)

Ex-Minister Sukhram granted bail in disproportionate assets case

New Delhi, Apr 22 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted bail to former Union Minister Sukhram, who was sentenced to three years imprisonment, in connection with a disproportionate assets case.

On February 25, a Delhi court had sentenced Sukhram to three years imprisonment in the case. A court also imposed a fine of Rs two lakh on Sukhram.

The court had suspended his sentence for two months giving an opportunity for him to appeal in the High Court against his conviction.

Earlier, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had pleaded before a court to give the maximum punishment of seven years to Sukhram.

On February 20, the court had said, Sukhram, a cabinet colleague of Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao, amassed disproportionate assets, both movable and immovable, to the tune of Rs 5.36 crore between 1991 and 1996.

He was convicted under various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act dealing with criminal misconduct by a public servant. (ANI)

Tytler granted bail in defamation case

New Delhi, Apr 18 (ANI): Congress leader Jagdish Tytler was on Saturday granted bail by a Delhi court in a case of making alleged insulting remarks against the lawyer of 1984 anti-Sikh riots victims, Harvinder Singh Phoolka in television news programmes.

He has also been excused from appearing personally till his plea for permanent exemption from court appearances is cleared by the court.

Tytler has been granted bail on furnishing of a personal and urety bond of Rs 50,000 each.a

Tytler’s plea seeking an everlasting exemption from appearances before the court, was strongly opposed by Phoolka’s counsel Kamna Vohra.

Vohra contended that Tytler himself had asked for transfer of case from Ludhiana court to the Delhi court. She said that now, he cannot ask for exemption from appearance.

In 2004, Phoolka had slapped a case against Tytler at the Ludhiana court, accusing him of making derogatory remarks in programmes telecasted on a private news channel on September 7 in the same year. (ANI)

CBI gives clean chit to Amod Kanth in Uphaar case

New Delhi, Apr 17 (ANI): The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Friday gave a clean chit to former Delhi Police officer Amod Kanth in connection with the Uphaar fire tragedy case of June 13, 1997.

Kanth was accused of illegally allowing the retention of 37 extra seats in theatre, where a fire claimed 59 lives 12 years ago.

According to reports, no criminal act were found to have been committed by any of the officials of any department other than the 16 persons chargesheeted in the Uphaar case.

District and Sessions Judge I. K. Kochhar has now fixed the matter for consideration for May 13.

Kanth, the then Deputy Commissioner of Police (Licensing), had allegedly allowed Uphaar theatre owners, Sushil and Gopal Ansal, to retain 37 extra seats in the balcony which had led to the closure of an exit gate.

On February 12, 2004, a Delhi court issued a notice to the CBI on an application for summoning Kanth.

The application was moved by the Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC). (ANI)

Delhi court to decide Jagdish Tytler’s fate today

New Delhi, Apr 9 (ANI): The Kakardooma Court will today decide the fate of former Union Minister Jagdish Tytler in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

The court may decide on accepting the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) closure report against Tytler and ordering the quashing of charges against him or order fresh investigation into the case.

On April 2, Tytler was given a clean chit by the CBI in the case. De-sealing its final investigation report in a court, the CBI recommended quashing of FIR against Tytler.

The CBI counsel told Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Rakesh Pandit that we have filed the cancellation report in the matter and want to close the investigation.

H S Phoolka, counsel for the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee, raised objections over the alleged leak of the report to Tytler who had claimed innocence in the case.

On March 28, the CBI filed the report in a sealed envelope before Metropolitan Magistrate Ram Lal Meena.

Tytler was among the three prominent leaders named in the reports on anti-Sikh riots. Two other leaders named were Sajjan Kumar and the late HKL Bhagat.

The 1984 anti-Sikh riots, which claimed the lives of almost 3000 Sikhs, were triggered by the assassination of Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984 by two of her Sikh bodyguards. (ANI)

Delhi court rejects bail plea of 2 POTA accused

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has dismissed the bail plea of two brothers, suspected to be members of the banned Pakistan-based militant organisation
Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), facing trial under the POTA.

A special judge for POTA here refused the plea of Raees-uz-Zama and Atique-uz-Zama who sought release on bail for two months to attend marriage of their younger brother.

“Keeping in view the circumstances coupled with the gravity of the offences with which the accused were charged with, their plea for interim bail was declined,” the court said.

In their bail applications, the Zama brothers submitted that they were required to make arrangements for the marriage of their brother to be solemnised on April 17 as their mother was an old woman. The brothers also said they have been languishing in jail for more than five years.

The Special Cell of Delhi Police, however, opposed their plea on the ground that the accused were not supposed to perform any religious ceremonies in the marriage, while their parents and other members of the family could look after the arrangements.

The two brothers were arrested from Sikandrabad in Uttar Pradesh upon disclosure by suspected JeM terrorists from Kashmir — Noor Mohammed Tantray, Pervez Ahmed Mir and Farooz Ahmed — following their arrest from a place here on August 30, 2003 allegedly with 10 hand grenades, two grenade shells and one grenade launcher.

Soumya case: Cops to question 4 accused

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Saturday allowed Delhi Police to question the four accused in custody in TV journalist Soumya Vishwanathan murder case
after it was told that the car in which they had tailed the victim was yet to be recovered.

Additional chief metropolitan magistrate Kiran Bansal remanded accused Ravi Kapoor, Amit Kumar Shukla and Baljit Malik to five days’ police custody while fourth accused Ajay has been sent to three days’ custody.

“The Wagon-R car used by the accused in chasing down the victim journalist and the weapon of offence are to be recovered and for this purpose, the custodial interrogation of the accused was needed,” Investigation officer (IO) submitted.

They are “hardcore criminals” and have been involved in over 50 cases and their questioning would help in tracking the missing links in the case, the IO seeking their custodial interrogation said. The car in which all the accused chased the slain scribe was being driven by Kapoor, the IO claimed, adding their joint questioning was required to unravel the conspiracy.

Allowing the plea, the court ordered that before taking them in the police custody, the medical tests be done on the accused.

Soumya, an employee of a private news channel, was found shot dead in her car on September 30 last year while returning home from office.

Meanwhile, Tihar Jail superintendent filed his reply denying the allegations of accused Kapoor that he was physically tortured during the judicial custody which resulted in fracture in his leg.

The court had on April 1 asked the jail superintendent to appear in person on April 4 to explain the non-filing of the medical report after Kapoor alleged he was tortured by the police in the prison.

The accused had already refused to undergo the Test Identification Parade (TIP) in connection with the murder case of Soumya and call centre employee Jigisha Ghosh.

Besides Ajay, the three other accused are in judicial custody in connection with the Ghosh murder case. Ghosh (28) was killed in the wee hours of March 18 while returning from a call centre. The recovery of the weapon allegedly used in the murder of Ghosh led to the cracking of the killing of Soumya case also, police say.

Delhi court rejects plea of brothers accused under POTA

New Delhi, Apr. 5 (ANI): Two suspected members of Pakistan-based militant organization Jaish-e-Mohammed have been refused bail by a Delhi POTA court.

Accused brothers, Raees-uz-Zama and Atique-uz-Zama, had sought release on bail for two months to attend marriage of their younger brother, but a special judge for POTA rejected their plea.

“Keeping in view the circumstances coupled with the gravity of the offences with which the accused were charged with, their plea for interim bail was declined,” the judge said.

In their bail applications, the Zama brothers submitted that they were required to make arrangements for the marriage of their brother to be solemnized on April 17, as their mother was an old woman.

The brothers also stated that they have been languishing in jail for more than five years.

However, the Special Cell of Delhi Police argued that the accused were not supposed to perform any religious ceremonies in the marriage, while their parents and other members of the family could look after the arrangements.

Zama brothers were arrested from Sikandrabad in Uttar Pradesh following revelation by suspected JeM terrorists Noor Mohammed Tantray, Pervez Ahmed Mir and Farooz Ahmed

On August 30, 2003, they reportedly were arrested with 10 hand grenades, two grenade shells and one grenade launcher. (ANI)