ANALYSIS – Syria seeks room to manoeuvre in harsh region

Syria, a middling Arab country formally at war with Israel over the occupied Golan Heights, must juggle its alliances to survive in a volatile Middle East.

Threats of a new conflict have ricocheted between Syria, Israel, Iran and Lebanon this year, especially after Israeli and U.S. talk of alleged Syrian arms transfers to Lebanese Hezbollah fighters, although leaders on all sides deny they want a fight.

Impatient with the United States, but keeping the door ajar, President Bashar al-Assad is clinging to an Iranian-led “resistance” camp, while signalling readiness to resume indirect peace talks with Israel via Turkey, a former foe turned friend.

“We cannot wait any longer,” he told Italy’s La Repubblica newspaper this week. “President (Barack) Obama’s America had raised expectations regarding a new Middle East policy. But now the clock of history is striking a new hour.”

Syria was now forging a regional order with Russia as well as Turkey and Iran, rather than relying on Western powers.

“This is not a turnabout,” said Assad, who has ruled Syria for nearly 10 years. “We want good relations with Washington. Rather it is about recognising reality: the failure by America and Europe in solving the problems of the world, in our region.”

Whether any new alignment will have better luck remains to be seen — even Assad acknowledged that the United States would play a decisive role in the final stage of any peace settlement.

Syria has emerged from the isolation it endured after the 2005 assassination of Lebanese statesman Rafik al-Hariri. It denied responsibility but was forced to pull its troops out of Lebanon after an outcry led by Washington, Paris and Riyadh.

SLOW GOING

Obama’s “engagement” with Syria has proved frustrating for both sides — Congress has yet to confirm a U.S. ambassador to Damascus named in February after a five-year hiatus. Obama has renewed sanctions on Syria, while easing some in practice.

Some Syrians view the glass as half-full.

“The American school is about to re-open, the ambassador has been named, there have been high-level visits from U.S. officials and a blind eye to some of the sanctions,” said Sami Moubayed, a historian. “Relations are nowhere as bad as they were under George W. Bush. Are we in a honeymoon? Not yet.”

Reviled as an “evil-doer” by Obama’s predecessor Bush, Syria has calmed some Western concerns about its behaviour in the region, just as the intended U.S. troop pullout from Iraq has assuaged some Syrian fears about Western militarism.

“Their external isolation is reduced,” a Western diplomat said. “It’s not that Syria has done nothing. Across the regional issues there has been limited progress in all areas.”

Ticking them off, he said Damascus had re-set relations with Lebanon after improving ties with Saudi Arabia. The flow of foreign militants into Iraq had all but ceased as U.S. pullout plans crystallised. Syria clearly wanted a stable, unified Iraq.

Turkish-mediated talks with Israel had made progress until the Gaza war halted them in December 2008. Syria had neither helped nor hindered U.S.-led efforts on the Palestinian track.

“Where concerns remain is weapons transfers to Hezbollah — real concerns about that — and to a lesser extent the relationship with Hamas, although Syria isn’t seen as a primary supplier of weapons in that case,” the diplomat said.

For Syria, the end-goal of any U.S. engagement is the return of the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in 1967, Moubayed said.

“A credible, sustainable deal needs the United States. So far Obama has been helpless at moving that track forward. You need to jump-start talks on the Golan,” he declared.

Prospects for renewing indirect talks via Turkey seem dim after Turkish criticism of Israeli policy in recent months.

“The Turks and Syrians are ready, but the Israelis aren’t. They say the Turks are no longer impartial,” Moubayed said.

Instead, Syria and Israel have been talking more of war than peace, although for now neither seems to want a confrontation.

INFLUENCE IN LEBANON

In Lebanon, arena of a 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah war, Syria’s allies have effective veto power in the government. Hariri’s son Saad has visited Damascus twice as Lebanese prime minister.

That alone indicates how much influence Syria has regained in the neighbour it dominated during its 29-year troop presence.

“In Lebanon, Syria has never been this close to having a full house,” said Peter Harling, the International Crisis Group’s Syria analyst, citing a spectrum of relationships.

Apart from its warm ties with Shi’ites through Hezbollah, Syria can manage Lebanon’s Sunni community via Hariri and the Saudis, and has won over key Christian leaders, as well as Druze chieftain Walid Jumblatt, once its bitterest critic.

Syria has made such gains without heeding U.S-Israeli pressure to ditch its alliances with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas.

Assad mingles with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah as easily as he does with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan and the Emir of Qatar.

“Syria is trying to keep one foot in the resistance camp and one in this more pragmatic camp in the middle,” Harling said.

“Its strength lies in its ability to juggle relationships and the ambiguity and ambivalence of its foreign policy.”

(Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

UN’s Ban urges Bissau order after army boss ousting

* President, PM hold talks after army chief ousted

* PM Gomes receives threat by new army boss

* UN’s Ban urges talks between civilians, military

By Alberto Dabo

BISSAU, April 2 (Reuters) – Guinea Bissau’s leaders held emergency talks on Friday after renegade soldiers ousted the army chief, with the United Nations appealing for a return to order in the fragile West African state.

The new chiefs of the country’s armed forces, long a source of instability in a country which is a major drugs trafficking route to Europe, denied their seizure of military command on Thursday had been an attempt to overthrow the government.

Prime Minister Carlos Gomes Junior, who was briefly held by soldiers on Thursday, rushed in a police convoy to the palace of President Malam Bacai Sanha on Friday morning, a Reuters witness in the capital said.

Sanha played down the affair as an internal army dispute, but there was concern it would undermine his efforts to bring stability to the country since soldiers assassinated his predecessor Joao Bernardo Vieira in March 2009.

“(U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon) calls on the military and political leadership … to resolve differences by peaceful means and to maintain constitutional order and ensure respect for the rule of law,” Ban’s office said in a statement.

Yet Gomes Junior’s political future remained in question after the new armed forces chief issuing a stark warning to him and supporters who had protested against his temporary detention by the soldiers behind the command grab on Thursday.

“If the demonstrators do not leave the streets, I will kill them all, and I will kill Carlos Gomes Junior,” General Antonio Njai told a news conference shortly after former armed forces chief of staff Admiral Jose Zamora Induta was arrested.

FORMER COUP SUSPECT

The core of the grievances between Njai and Gomes was not clear in a country where the army — which credits itself with a decisive role in wresting independence from Portuguese in 1974 — has long jostled for power with civilian leaders.

But a Western diplomat in the capital said it was linked to a simultaneous incident on Thursday in which soldiers entered a U.N. compound in the capital and emerged with the chief suspect in a failed 2008 coup bid who had sought refuge there.

The suspect, former navy chief Bubo Na Tchuto, is an ally of Njai and was due to be handed over to Gomes’s government. Na Tchuto was by Njai’s side at the news conference on Thursday.

The instability in Guinea-Bissau, whose meagre $400 million-a-year formal economy is based on cashews and phosphates, has not tended to spill over to neighbouring Senegal or its equally unstable larger neighbour Guinea.

But it has become a hub for hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Latin American cocaine trafficked into Europe, and U.S. officials had raised concerns of it becoming a “narco-state” comparable to Afghanistan under its former Taliban rulers.

Nepal peace process assured of EU support

Kathmandu, May 26 (ANI): European Union (EU) envoys on Tuesday assured to extend full support to Nepal peace process and Constitution drafting.

The ambassadors from EU nations met newly elected Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal and congratulated him for being the second prime minister of the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal.

Envoys from the United Kingdom, Finland, including other EU nations stressed on the need for the re-verification of the Maoist Peoples Liberation Army in the cantonments at the earliest.

Nepalnews quoted Prime Minister’s foreign affairs advisor Rajan Bhattarai as saying that the ambassadors also assured to provide assistance in package for the rehabilitation of the Maoist combatants.

They also urged the Prime Minister to hold the meeting of Nepal Development Forum (NDF) at the earliest.

In response, Madhav Kumar said he would not compromise with any one on peace process and civilian supremacy.

“Taking the peace process to a logical conclusion and Constitution drafting would be the chief priorities of the new government,” he added.

Meanwhile, the Madheshi Janadhikar Forum (MJF), which has a decisive role in the current coalition, has claimed for six ministries in the new cabinet.

The claim came after a joint meeting of the alliance of Madhesh based parties headed by MJF chairman Upendra Yadav. The meeting also decided to claim two ministries for the Terai Madhesh Loktantrik Party (TMLP) and one ministry for the Sadbhawana party (SP).

The Nepali Congress and the CPN (UML) have offered four ministries to MJF, two to TMLP and one to SP and decided to keep six ministries each themselves.

According to sources, MJF’s claim is one of the reasons for the delay in cabinet formation. The party claimed six ministries, as it was essential to pacify the growing rift between the two factions within the party.

A meeting of the major coalition partners will take place later today to discuss the distribution of ministries. (ANI)

Madhav Kumar could become new Nepal PM: Report

Kathmandu, May 17 (IANS) Madhav Kumar Nepal could become the new prime minister of Nepal with his CPN-UML-led alliance getting the crucial support from a Madheshi Janadhikar Forum (MJF) faction, media reports said Sunday.

The Bijay Gachchhadar led MJF faction’s decision to support the CPN-UML led government came after a meeting of leaders of UML, Nepali Congress, MJF and Bijay Gachchhadar-led faction of MJF Sunday morning, Kantipuronline news portal reported.

During the meeting that was held at Nepali Congress chief Girija Prasad Koirala’s resident in Maharajgunj, the 35-member Gachchhadar-led faction of MJF agreed to lend its support to the UML-NC alliance, the Nepalnews reported.

‘The party took this decision (to support the UML-NC alliance), coming to conclusion that the country should not remain without a government for long,’ Gachchhadar told media persons.

There were also reports that Gachchhadar was promised the plum post of deputy-prime minister/home minister, which was earlier held by CPN-UML leader Bam Dev Gautam.

MJF, which holds a decisive role in the new government formation process, is deeply divided on which party to support for the new coalition. While the Gachchhadar-led faction supported the UML-led alliance, another faction led by party Chairman Upendra Yadav – with 18 members – has announced its support to the Maoists.

CPN-UML has elected its 54-year-old veteran leader Madhav Kumar Nepal to head an alliance government, and if things go smoothly, Nepal will form the next government soon.

Nepal has been struggling to stitch a government since Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda’s resignation May 4 over his dispute with President Ram Baran Yadav, who reinstated Army Chief General Rukmangad Katawal, dismissed by the Maoist supremo.

For India, Singh-Obama meet may overshadow G20

Much is at stake in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to London to participate in a summit of G20 (Group of 20) nations on April 2. And kick-starting the world economy (as well as India’s) will probably be priority No.

2 in a summit that hopes to fix the global downturn. The more important meeting will probably be with US President Barack Obama the same evening.

Of course, the two leaders will discuss the world economic crisis. But the bigger issue for the India-US relationship would possibly be regional – Pakistan and Afghanistan in particular and South Asia in general.

They will also discuss “more open disclosures, easier access to this information, particularly if it is linked to illegal activities by Swiss Banks”, said foreign secretary Shivshankar Menon. “The issue is broader,” he said.

Setting new rules for tax havens is something that G20 nations are likely to converge on in the summit. “The new ‘rules of the road’ for Caribbean and other tax havens will be included in a communique issued by G20,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

The creation of G20 as an informal group in 1999 followed the Asian financial crisis. This week will either see the group mature through the release of a “declaration document” or get countries that comprise 90 per cent of world GDP and 80 per cent of world trade to look inwards.

Backed by his trusted “sherpa” Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia and his team of liberal economists, the Indian agenda has not been clearly defined so far. “We were very involved in the preparatory process, that’s why you have this impression,” Menon said.

For a country that hopes to stay on the high table of finance and play a decisive role in the construction of a new global regulatory architecture, not having a stated position is unexpected. But speaking to government officials and industry captains, if there’s one overarching Indian stance, it is to fight protectionist tendencies.

“We are against protectionism,” Menon said. “We would like to see a very strong statement coming out of G20 against protectionism.

” The big negotiation issue here is Obama’s calls on making outsourcing less attractive by removing tax credits companies get, “buy American”, and lend to American companies. “Even giving a bailout to auto companies is some form of protectionism,” an industry official said.

“This beggar-thy-neighbour policy results in retaliation and falling trade.” Closing the Doha round is the other Indian priority.

The attempt here is to ensure that India is not seen to be a hindrance to Doha. “We don’t think we are protectionist,” Menon said.

“Each country will define protectionism in its own way.” Finally, creating a blueprint for a global regulatory framework that brings in transparency and disclosures to complex financial products such as hedge funds and credit derivatives.

What India seeks is to “strengthen national regulation along global principles”. All of which are medium- to long-term fixes.

What about the immediate crisis? “With the preparatory process, the details are out of the way,” Menon said. “At this summit, we will look at the big issues.

” It is the details where the G20 is divided into four clear groups: the US-UK-IMF combine, continental Europe, emerging economies and China. For now, India seems to be standing like a solitary reaper.

Sharif demands FIR against Benazir’s killers

Faisalabad, Mar 8 (ANI): Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz chief Nawaz Sharif has demanded that the government should immediately register an FIR in connection with the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and arrest the accused in the case.

Addressing a public meeting at the Iqbal Park here, he said despite the passage of more than one year, the ruling party has registered no FIR.

After the end of the lawyers’ long march, he said, the PML-N would stage rallies for the arrest of Benazir Bhutto’s killers.

He denied the involvement of PML-N workers in vandalising the memorial of Benazir Bhutto, and asked the PPP workers to take out a rally along with him for unearthing the assassins of Benazir Bhutto.

Sharif called upon workers of all political parties, especially the PPP, to participate in the long march, The News reported.

He said the PML-N fully supported the just cause of lawyers for the restoration of the deposed judges and Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

He said political workers could play a decisive role at this critical juncture to bring true and lasting democracy in the country.

The PML-N leader said that he had signed an agreement with slain PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto for the restoration of democracy and all the deposed judges, and that Benazir had announced at her public meetings in Karachi and Rawalpindi that she herself would hoist the Pakistani flag at the residence of the deposed chief justice.

Before assuming power, he said, President Asif Ali Zardari also signed the agreement on March 9 at Murree and then on August 5 in Dubai and on August 7 in London, pledging that both the PPP and PML-N leaders would honour the agreements and restore the deposed judges within 24 hours.

He said the PML-N was still sticking to the agreements, President Zardari had betrayed them. “Nawaz Sharif is made in Pakistan” who would live and die for Pakistan, he said.

If President Zardari announced the restoration of all the judges, he said, he would not claim anything more from him during the remaining tenure of four years. (ANI)