Analysis: Obama may not see big boost from Wall Street reform

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama may struggle to reap political rewards from his big win on Wall Street reform — at least in the near term.

Passage of the most sweeping overhaul of the financial regulatory system since the Great Depression of the 1930s comes as Obama is trying to bolster his sinking poll numbers and avert an election catastrophe for his Democrats.

The financial bill could prove more helpful to Obama when he seeks re-election in 2012 than for Democratic lawmakers trying to keep their seats this November.

Wall Street reform marks the latest in a series of major legislative achievements for the president, who campaigned on a promise of change.

Americans are focused on high unemployment and ballooning budget deficits, and some worry Obama is overreaching with his agenda. That has prevented Obama from gaining a lot of traction from two other signature initiatives: health care reform and the $862 billion stimulus package.

Financial reform could fit the same pattern.

“It will have relatively little positive effect on 2010,” said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University. “It’s something Obama can take to the voters in 2012.”

The complexity of the 2,300-page financial reform bill is one reason Baker says it might not help Democrats much in the November congressional elections.

“It has yet to play out and affect the lives of Americans,” Baker said. “It will be a long time before people get a sense that somehow their debit cards are better protected than they were before financial regulation reform was passed.”

BILL UNFAMILIAR

Many U.S. voters are unfamiliar with the financial overhaul, according to an Ipsos Public Affairs online poll.

The poll found 38 percent of Americans had never heard of the overhaul and 33 percent had heard of it but knew almost nothing about the legislation. Another 18 percent said they knew “a little bit” about it.

The healthcare measure is also complex, though Baker said voters might come to better appreciate both pieces of legislation by the time Obama seeks re-election in two years.

For now, the jobless rate, which stands at 9.5 percent, trumps healthcare and financial reform.

“If he can get job creation going and we start seeing a decline in unemployment, that’s really the only thing that’s going to rescue Obama and the Democrats,” said Chris Arterton, a political scientist at George Washington University.

That may be why Obama focused his weekly radio and Internet address on Saturday on his push for extensions in jobless benefits and a program to spur lending to small businesses.

The Senate scheduled a vote on the unemployment benefits on Tuesday — the day before the signing of financial reform.

The White House has openly expressed fear that Democrats could lose their dominance in the House of Representatives.

Democrats are seen as having a better chance of holding onto the Senate though they are expected to lose seats. That would make it harder for Obama to tackle other items on his agenda like energy and immigration legislation.

The White House depicts the financial reform debate as a choice: Setting responsible rules of the road for Wall Street versus allowing greed and recklessness to run rampant.

Obama has argued Wall Street must be reined in to protect consumers and prevent a repeat of the financial implosion that plunged the country into its longest recession in decades.

CREDIT CARD FINE PRINT

Senior Obama aide David Axelrod disagreed with those who see the financial bill as too complex to resonate with voters.

“I don’t think it’s complicated to tell credit card holders that they have new rights relative to their credit card companies or mortgage holders that their prepayment penalties are now limited,” Axelrod said.

“I understand that not everybody is steeped in the knowledge of derivatives and all of this kind of exotic instruments that were part of the saga of the financial crisis,” he added. “But everybody in America deals with the headache of credit card fine print and variable mortgages.”

The Wall Street measure passed almost entirely along party lines, with only three Republicans breaking ranks to back it.

One obstacle for Democrats is a dampening of liberal enthusiasm because of concerns that industry lobbyists won too many concessions and loopholes in the final bill.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, an outside adviser to Obama, was disappointed in a rule named after him to prohibit banks with federal deposit insurance from betting with their own money. Volcker felt the rule was too watered-down.

But Republicans are prepared to attack the financial bill from a different vantage point. They hope that the bill and Obama’s populist, anti-Wall Street rhetoric will reinforce an “anti-business” image they are trying to pin on him.

House of Representatives Republican leader John Boehner has called the financial legislation ill-conceived and said he wants to repeal it.

“It’s going to make credit harder for the American people to get, clearly harder for businesses to get,” Boehner said. “It’s going to punish every banker in America for the sins of a few on Wall Street.”

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Xavier Briand)

Small U.S. banks protest debit fee restrictions

NEW YORK, June 9 (Reuters) – U.S. community banks said a proposal to require big banks to reduce fees they charge merchants would in fact force smaller lenders to boost the fees they charge consumers.

Lawmakers are hashing out a financial reform bill that includes limits on interchange fees, which banks charge merchants for processing debit card transactions.

The fees apply to the biggest banks, but small banks say credit card companies will force all lenders to accept lower fees.

Reduced fees will not cover the small lenders’ costs, said Dan Mica, a former Democratic congressman from Florida who now heads the trade group Credit Union National Association.

“There’s millions, if not billions, of dollars of costs involved (in operating debit cards), and somebody has to pick it up,” Mica said on an online teleconference on Wednesday.

If merchants do not pay the fees, consumers will have to, Mica said.

Merchants pay banks a fee whenever customers pay with credit or debit cards. These fees alleviate the costs of providing fraud protection, said Camden Fine, chief executive officer of the Independent Community Bankers of America, the primary trade group for small U.S. banks.

For example, after a ring of hackers stole millions of credit and debit card numbers from major U.S. retail chains including TJX Cos (TJX.N), banks had to replace their customers’ cards, he said.

“Banks paid for that,” Fine said. “We don’t want to be left holding the bag the next time there’s a card breach.”

The measure under consideration as part of the Senate’s financial reform bill would only apply to banks with assets of more than $10 billion, according to the draft legislation.

“This amendment, while perhaps well intentioned, has no place in a regulatory reform bill,” Fine said during the Web conference, which was sponsored by the Electronic Payments Coalition, a collection of trade groups for banks and credit card companies. “This has nothing to do with the financial crisis. It didn’t trigger the financial crisis.”

There are nearly 8,000 banks in the United States. Most of them are community banks and credit unions, but the biggest banks hold most of the country’s banking assets. (Reporting by Maria Aspan; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

Aussies can do without breakfast, but not mobiles, fav bags

Melbourne, July 16(ANI): Call it “materialism” or simple liking, but most people prefer to sacrifice breakfast than live without their mobile phones or favourite bag, a new Australian study has found.

The research conducted by arnold and bolingbroke on the bequest of American Express focussed on the attachment Aussies have to the personal possessions they carry every day.

It came out with results that 61 per cent of the 1001 citizens polled can’t live without their plastic credit and debit cards, while 60 per cent must have mobile phones, News.Com.Au reports.

Also 32 per cent said they couldn’t sustain without their favourite bag and 24 per cent said their laptop was their most treasured possession.

The analysis divulged to examine who would be willing to live without watching their favourite television show for a fortnight for the sake of their personal possessions, to which 52 per cent said ‘yes’.

Making the scan even broader 48 per cent said they would give up exercising, 34 per cent would give up eating breakfast for a fortnight, 11 per cent would sacrifice quality time with their partner and six percent would cease showering.

American Express head of insurance Fady Taouk said the survey suggested items such as plastic credit and debit cards, mobile phones and gadgets were no longer considered luxuries.

He said: “They are modern day essentials that provide convenience, peace of mind and security.” (ANI)

No charge on withdrawing cash from other bank ATM’s from April 1

New Delhi, Mar 29 (ANI): The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) directive to the banks to stop charging fee for cash withdrawals using ATM and debit cards issued by other lenders will be implemented from April 1 onwards.

According to the directive, the people would be saved from paying an extra fee for taking out money from an Automated Teller Machine that does not belong to their own bank.

However, the banks are still allowed to charge extra for the services like cash withdrawal from ATM’s outside India.

The RBI, last year on March 20 had limited the fee charged for using other ATM’s by customers to Rs 20. The move had permitted the use of ATM’s for purposes like checking the balance enquiry free of charge.

This had led to various banks entering into bilateral and multi-lateral arrangements with other banks to have inter-bank ATM networks. (ANI)