FACTBOX – Key facts about UK’s Ed Miliband

REUTERS – Here are key facts about Ed Miliband, Britain’s former energy and climate change secretary, who announced on Saturday he was running for the leadership of the Labour party.

– Miliband is the younger brother of former Foreign Secretary David Miliband, the only other candidate so far to announce he is running for the leadership.

– Supporters say Ed, who wrote the Labour party’s 2010 election manifesto, has a more relaxed presentational style than his brother that would make him the best candidate to deal with slick Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron.

– Born in December 1969, the son of Jewish immigrants, he studied at Oxford University and the London School of Economics, and is seen as one of the party’s rising stars.

– Before becoming a member of parliament, Miliband chaired the Treasury’s council of economic advisers and then served as an adviser to then finance minister Gordon Brown.

– Elected the Labour MP for Doncaster North in May 2005, he is less well known among the British public than his brother but is popular within the party and has the support of the trade unions, Labour’s biggest financial backers.

Race for UK Labour leadership becomes family affair

Former Energy and Cimate Change Secretary Ed Miliband joined his elder brother in the race for leadership of Britain’s Labour party on Saturday, saying the centre-left party had lost touch with its progressive values.

On Wednesday former Foreign Secretary David Miliband was the first senior party figure to announce his bid for the leadership, a day after Gordon Brown resigned as prime minister and leader of the centre-left party.

“I have decided to stand to be leader of the Labour party,” Ed Miliband, 40, said in a speech to the Fabian Society, a centre-left think tank.

“We lost touch with the values that made us a progressive force in politics and we lost touch with the people we sought to represent.”

The Labour leadership race is likely to turn into a battle between left and right wings of the party, both of which will draw different lessons from its defeat in last week’s election.

David Miliband, regarded as a “Blairite”, is the favourite of the right of the party. The brothers are likely to face a challenge from a more left-leaning candidate such as former Schools Secretary Ed Balls.

While Ed Miliband is less well known to the public than his brother, he is popular within the party and has the support of the trade unions, Labour’s biggest financial backers, giving him support from both left and right.

The party, which grew out of the trade union movement and was founded in 1900, swung to the left in the 1980s and lost a string of elections before Tony Blair moved it to the centre. He was prime minister for a decade from 1997 before handing over to Brown.

In a speech that was highly critical of his party’s 13 years in government, Miliband said that while Labour had done much to be proud of in the early years, it had been left behind on many issues, including the economy, fairness and immigration.

“My message to the British people is we will learn from our mistakes, we will be part of your values again, we will be part of your community again and we will work with you to build the kind of country we want to see,” he said.

(Editing by Tim Pearce)

Brit PM Brown resigns in a dramatic move

London, May 11 (ANI): British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, in a dramatic move, has announced that he will step down as leader of the Labour Party in order to pave the way for talks with the Liberal Democrats to facilitate formation of the next government.

The announcement made by Brown is likely to derail an imminent deal between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, as the latter had reportedly made leadership change a condition for them to work with the Labour Party.

Brown seized on David Cameron’s failure to secure a pact with Nick Clegg by opening formal talks to agree to a so-called coalition of losers, The Telegraph reports.

Brown in a surprise move offered to oversee talks between the two parties before stepping down by the time of the Labour conference in September, when a new leader would be chosen by party members.

In a statement, Brown said if it was in “national interest” for Labour and Liberal Democrats to form a coalition government that would enjoy a majority in a hung Parliament, he had “no desire to stay on longer than needed”.

“”We have a parliamentary system, not a presidential system, in this country. As I said on Friday, with no party able to command a parliamentary majority arising from the General Election, my constitutional duty as Prime Minister is to ensure government continues while parties explore options for forming a new administration with majority support in the House of Commons.”

“As we know, the Liberal Democrats felt they should first talk to the Conservative Party. Clegg has just informed me that, while he intends to continue his dialogue that he has begun with the Conservatives, he now wishes also to take forward formal discussions with the Labour Party,” The Telegraph quoted Brown, as saying.

If the Labour Party accepts Brown’s proposal that would mean he would remain at Downing Street for another five months.

The leadership campaign, which is likely to be contested by David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, his brother Ed, the Climate Change Secretary, and Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, and others, will only begin after any talks are concluded.

The paper reports that on Monday night senior Conservatives accused the Lib Dem leader of “treachery” after it emerged that Clegg had changed the basis of a deal with Cameron just minutes before Brown made his statement. (ANI)

Miliband may take over from Brown: Report

London, May 7 (IANS) With the Labour party suffering heavy electoral losses, Foreign Secretary David Miliband was set to challenge Prime Minister Gordon Brown for the party leadership, a report said Friday.

The Sun reported that Thursday night saw Miliband preparing to strike as a disaster was predicted for Labour in the Thursday general elections.

Miliband is a favourite to succeed Brown. He has received support from former prime minister Tony Blair and Business Secretary Peter Mandelson.

Miliband won from the South Shields constituency with 52 percent of the votes. Conservative candidate Karen Allen stood second while Liberal Democrat Stephen Psallidas was third.

Miliband’s allies are keen that MP Jon Cruddas becomes Miliband’s deputy in what they call a ‘dream ticket’ for the leadership.

The media report said that Miliband was urged to have a proper contest for the leadership instead of an unelected takeover like Brown when he succeeded Blair.

Miliband may attempt to take over from Brown: Report

London, May 7 (IANS) With the Labour party prepared for electoral losses, Foreign Secretary David Miliband was closely looking at the voters’ verdict as he may challenge Gordon Brown, a media report said Friday.

The Sun reported that Thursday night saw Miliband preparing to strike as a disaster was predicted for Labour at the general elections.

He is a favourite to succeed Brown and has received support from former prime minister Tony Blair and and Business Secretary Peter Mandelson.

Miliband won from the South Shields constituency with 52 percent of the votes. Conservative candidate Karen Allen stood second while Liberal Democrat Stephen Psallidas was third.

Miliband’s allies are keen that MP Jon Cruddas becomes Miliband’s deputy in what they call a ‘dream ticket’ for the leadership.

The media report said that he was urged to have a proper contest for the leadership, instead of an unelected take over like Brown when he succeeded Blair.

Labour woos Liberal Democrats in bid to retain power

London, May 7 (IANS) Labour seemed to be reaching out to the Liberal Democrats in an apparent last ditch bid to retain power with a senior Labour leader saying he has ‘no problem in principle in trying to supply this country with a strong and stable government’.

Soon after balloting came to an end, Lord Mandelson, Labour’s election director, said: ‘There has to be electoral reform because clearly first past the post is on its last legs.’

‘The constitutional conventions are very clear. The rules are that if it’s a hung parliament, it’s not the party with the largest number of seats that has first go – it’s the sitting government,’ The Telegraph quoted Mandelson as saying.

On whether he would seek an alliance with the Liberal Democrats, he categorically said: ‘I have no problem in principle in trying to supply this country with a strong and stable government.’

Foreign Secretary David Miliband observed that the exit poll showed no party can have a ‘monopoly of power’ and voters have given politicians ‘an injunction to talk to each other’ to see if ‘strong and stable’ government could be achieved.

‘One point that is very important is that if no party has a majority in the House of Commons, then no party has the right to power. Obviously, we have to wait until the end of the night. If no party has a majority, no party has a moral right to power.’

Exit polls released after polling stations closed Thursday evening predicted a hung parliament, in which neither of Britain’s two main parties would gain an overall majority.

The exit polls, based on surveys of 18,000 voters, showed a disappointing outcome for the Liberal Democrats, whose leader Nick Clegg had been declared the undisputed star of the four-week election campaign.

The exit polls gave the David Cameron-led Conservatives 307 seats, 19 short of an outright majority. The Labour Party would win 255 seats, compared with 356 in 2005, and the Liberals were given 59 seats, remaining behind expectations.

On the possibility of a hung parliament, Labour’s election coordinator, Douglas Alexander, said: ‘Ultimately you need to be able to command a majority in the House of Commons. It will be for us to decide – along with every other party – what is the best way forward as these results play themselves out.’

Conservatives didn’t take kindly to the suggestion that Labour was willing to try and forge a deal with the Liberal Democrats that would keep them out of power.

‘It’s pretty clear that Labour cannot continue in government. Labour ministers need to get real. I find it extraordinary listening to these Labour politicians,’ George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, was quoted as saying.

Labour looking for coalition as exit polls predict a hung parliament

London, May 7 (ANI): Britain might be heading for its first hung parliament in 36 years if exit poll predictions are to be gone by.

As the election counting begins in a closely contested general election, the Conservatives are struggling to obtain necessary battleground gains to claim power outright, despite some considerable swings.

Nevertheless, the Tories seemed optimistic about the election outcome believing that winds of change are sweeping through Britain with the Labour Party heading for a possible defeat for the first time in thirteen years.

The Sky News/BBC/ITN poll expects the Conservatives to win 305 seats, with Labour on 255 and the Lib Dems on 61.

According to Sky News, the result would see David Cameron”s party fall short of the 326 MPs needed for an overall majority by 21 seats.

Earlier, a Tory spokesman said the projected result was a “decisive rejection of Labour” and enough for the Conservatives to form a minority government.

After sweeping to victory in his Witney constituency, Mr Cameron said, “We have to wait for the full results, but it is clear the Labour government has lost its mandate to govern this country.”

But if the exit poll prediction is realised, it would present Labour with enough seats to align with Nick Clegg”s party to form an administration.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband told Sky News dismissed Tory claims to office and indicated that a Lib-Lab pact was likely.

“If no party has a majority in the House of Commons, no party has a moral right to a monopoly of power,” he said.

Business Secretary Peter Mandelson said early results were proof “people are not flying into the arms of the Tories”.

Meanwhile, the projected figure of 61 seats is a huge setback for the Lib Dems after such a buoyant election campaign.

Lib Dem Economics spokesperson Vince Cable deemed the exit poll a “strange result” amid disbelief from party activists.

Sky News business reports that the fluctuations of voting patterns have had a significant effect on the British markets with the pound registering a slight depreciation, in the minutes after the exit poll was published the pound slipped by around one cent against the dollar. (ANI)

UK would not have invaded Iraq ‘if we knew what we know now’: Miliband

London, Apr 20(ANI): British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has said that the UK would not have invaded Iraq in 2003, if it had been clear that the then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

When asked if he would still have supported the invasion of Iraq if he had known then what was known now, Miliband said: “Obviously there would have been no such decision”.

“If we had known then what we know now, if we”d have known that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, there would have been no UN resolutions and no vote in the House of Commons,” The Scotsman quoted Miliband, as saying.

His position appears to clash with comments made by then-British Prime Minister Tony Blair and then -Chancellor Gordon Brown, who have insisted that removing Saddam would “still have been the right decision”.

In January, Blair told the Iraq Inquiry he felt “responsibility, but not regret” for removing Saddam.

“I believe he threatened not just the region, but the world. And in the circumstances that we faced then, but I think even if you look back now, it was better to deal with this threat, to remove him from office,” Blair said.

Brown giving evidence to the same inquiry last month, said it had been the “right decision” to overthrow Saddam, who he said had been a “serial violator” of international law.

“These were difficult decisions, these were decisions that required judgment, these were decisions that required strong leadership, these were decisions that were debated and divided a lot of opinion in the country,” Brown had said.

“I believe they were the right decisions for the right reasons, but I also believe it is our duty to learn the lessons from what has happened,” he added. (ANI)

No action till passport probe ends: Smith

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith says the Government will wait for the results of a Federal Police investigation before deciding whether to take action against Israel over forged Australian passports.

Britain has expelled an Israeli diplomat after an investigation by its Serious Organised Crime Agency found that 12 forged British passports used in the assassination of a senior Hamas commander in Dubai were copied from real documents.

It said the copies were made after the passports were handed over for inspection “to individuals linked to Israel”.

Four forged Australian passports were also used in the hit on Mahmoud al-Mabhouh and an Australian Federal Police (AFP) team has travelled to Israel to investigate the matter.

Mr Smith has told The World Today the Government will not take any action against Israel until the AFP concludes its investigation.

“The AFP have been liaising with their British counterparts [and] they’ll take this report into account when they make and conclude their investigations,” he said.

“We’re treating this matter very seriously. Israel understands that.”

Mr Smith would not elaborate on how long the AFP investigation might take.

But he did say Australia would take into account what other countries had done when deciding on any action against Israel.

Mr Smith has spoken to Israeli ambassador Yuval Rotem over the matter and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said he was not satisfied with his explanation.

UK foreign secretary David Miliband briefed Mr Smith on the report earlier today and told the House of Commons the misuse of UK passports was “intolerable”.

“It presents a hazard for the safety of British nationals in the region. It also represents a profound disregard for the sovereignty of the UK,” he said.

Nicole McCabe, Joshua Bruce, Adam Korman and Joshua Krycer have been named as the Australians whose passports were forged.

All four live in Israel and Mr Smith reiterated that no evidence had been found to suggest that they were anything other than innocent victims of the forgery.

Dubai authorities say they are almost 100 per cent certain the Israeli spy agency, Mossad, was responsible for the hit and claim the assassins also used Irish, French and German passports to travel through the state.

Israel says there is no proof it was behind the assassination.

Britain to expel Israeli diplomat – reports

Britain was expected on Tuesday to expel an Israeli diplomat over the use of forged British passports by suspected killers of a Hamas commander in Dubai.

The Foreign Office declined to comment on media reports but said Foreign Secretary David Miliband would make a statement on the matter at 1530 GMT.

The head of Britain’s diplomatic service, Peter Ricketts, met Ron Prosor, the Israeli ambassador to London, on Monday, a spokesman for British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, but he gave no details of what was discussed.

Israel has neither confirmed nor denied a role in the January killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a military commander from the Palestinian organisation Hamas, in a Dubai hotel room.

Dubai’s police chief says he is almost certain Israeli agents were involved and has accused the intelligence agency Mossad of insulting Dubai.

Dubai authorities have named 27 alleged members of the team that tracked and killed the Palestinian, and said they used fraudulent British, Irish, French, German and Australian passports to enter and depart from Dubai. The misuse of passports has drawn condemnation from the European Union.

Britain’s Sky News said it did not know the level of seniority of the Israeli diplomat who faced expulsion.

The Israeli foreign ministry had no immediate comment.

Britain called in Prosor last month over the issue but he said he was “unable to assist” with more information.

BRITISH PROBE

Brown ordered a probe into the use of British passports and investigators from Britain’s Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) travelled to Dubai to investigate.

The agency has submitted a report to other government departments but “there are still some areas of enquiry”, a spokeswoman for SOCA said.

Britain expelled an Israeli diplomat in 1988 in an espionage row. The man, Arie Regev, was described at the time by informed British sources as a Mossad agent.

Israel was Britain’s third largest export market in the Middle East in 2007 with two-way trade worth 3 billion pounds ($4.50 billion), according to the latest figures available on the website of Britain’s investment promotion agency.

But relations between the two countries have been strained recently by a number of issues, including the threat of arrest for alleged war crimes faced by senior Israeli officials visiting Britain.

In July last year, Britain said it had blocked some arms sales to Israel over the Gaza offensive six months earlier.

British guidance to supermarkets last year that food from the West Bank should be labelled to show whether it came from Palestinian farms or Israeli settlements also irritated Israel.

The latest spat comes at a time of friction between Israel and its key ally, the United States, since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government announced plans to build 1,600 homes for Jews near East Jerusalem.

(Reporting by Estelle Shirbon in London and Ori Lewis in Jerusalem; Editing by Ralph Boulton)

Britain to expel Israeli diplomat – Sky TV report

Britain will expel an Israeli diplomat over the use of forged British passports in an assassination in Dubai, Sky News television reported on Tuesday, without disclosing its sources.

The Foreign Office declined to comment but said Foreign Secretary David Miliband would make a statement on the matter at 1530 GMT.

Sky News said it did not know the level of seniority of the diplomat who faced expulsion.

The Israeli foreign ministry said it had no immediate comment on the report. Spokesman Yigal Palmor said he was checking the details of the report.

Israel has neither confirmed nor denied a role in the killing of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a military commander from the Palestinian organisation Hamas, in a Dubai hotel room in January.

Dubai authorities have named 27 alleged members of the team that tracked and killed the Palestinian, and said they used fraudulent British, Irish, French, German and Australian passports to enter and depart from Dubai.

(Reporting by Estelle Shirbon in London and Ori Lewis in Jerusalem; Editing by Jon Hemming)

Chidambaram insists India will have access to Headley

London, Mar 24 (ANI): Union Home Minister P Chidambaram on Tuesday (GMT) refuted the media reports that US has denied India access to question Lashkar operative David Headley.

Addressing the media at the end of his three days London visit, Chidambaram said: “I don”t think so, I think channels are interpreting it under the pressure of deadlines and if you reflect more carefully that sentence no more contradicts what the US Attorney General told me,”

Chidambaram’s comment came after US envoy to India Timothy J. Roemer reportedly said the US had to follow legal procedures before India will get access to Headley.

Interacting with the media in New Delhi, Roemer had said the US is committed to full information sharing in our counter-terror partnership and in fact, in this case we have provided substantial information to the Government of India and we will continue to do so.

Issues related to police cooperation and security of Commonwealth Games figured during Chidambaram’s meeting with his British counterpart Alan Johnson.

“We discussed co-operation; He suggested an MoU on Police Co-operation, I say yes, there is nothing wrong with the MoU, but we must have more practical co-operation,” Chidambaram said.

“There are a number of areas where we can co-operate at practical levels between the agencies, forensic science labs, our scientists and technicians can get a chance to work with their scientists and technicians,” he added.

Chidambaram informed that the UK would send a team of security experts to assist Indian forces for Commonwealth Games.

“They are going to send a team on Commonwealth (Games) security. I said yes. So I think on practical level there are a number of things we can do,” Chidambaram said.

During his three days visit, Chidambaram held parleys with Foreign Secretary David Miliband and discussed issues related to India-UK bilateral dialogue on security and intelligence-related issues.

He also held parleys with senior British security officials and counter-terror experts besides visiting major intelligence and security institutions. (ANI)

China more concerned about Iran, wary on sanctions

China has become more concerned about international tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, but remains doubtful that sanctions can resolve the stand-off, the Chinese foreign minister said on Tuesday.

World | China

Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi was speaking after talks with visiting British Foreign Secretary (minister) David Miliband, where one of the key issues on the table was Iran.

Yang’s comments suggested that he had given little ground on Western calls that Beijing back proposed new sanctions over Tehran’s disputed nuclear activities, which China could block as a veto-wielding permanent member of the U.N. Security Council.

“Regarding the Iran nuclear issue, I wish to point out that this issue is the subject of widespread attention in the international community,” Yang told reporters.

“China has become more concerned about the current situation,” he said, adding that Beijing was still seeking a diplomatic solution.

Western powers say Iran wants the means to make nuclear weapons and has violated non-proliferation safeguards. German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Monday that the time had come for new sanctions.

Iran says its uranium enrichment activities are to make fuel for planned nuclear power plants.

China has resisted calls to tighten the economic screws on one of its major suppliers of oil, and Yang repeated Beijing’s long-standing position that sanctions could not resolve the tensions. But he stopped short of outright opposition.

“I have said before that sanctions do not provide a fundamental solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, ultimately this issue has to be resolved through peaceful negotiations,” he said.

“We will continue to make active efforts to bring about a diplomatic solution to the Iran nuclear issue.”

“SHARED GOAL”

A draft Western proposal calls for restricting more Iranian banks abroad, but does not press for sanctions against Iran’s oil and gas industries.

At the news briefing, Miliband described tackling Iran’s nuclear program as a “test for all of us” and noted that China had registered its increasing concern.

“We have a shared goal in ensuring that Iran lives by its commitments under the non-proliferation treaty, and we are going to work very closely together to achieve it,” he added.

China is one of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, each holding the power to veto resolutions. It backed previous Iran resolutions, after working to cut measures that could threaten flows of oil and Chinese investments.

In 2009, Iran was China’s third biggest source of imported crude oil, behind Angola and top supplier Saudi Arabia. Iran supplied China with 23.1 million metric tonnes of crude, or 11.4 percent of China’s total crude imports.

While Beijing abstains from Security Council votes on decisions it dislikes, it is much less willing to use its veto and risk diplomatic isolation, especially if fellow Security Council member Russia backs a resolution.

(Reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison; Editing by Alex Richardson)

Britain looks to China to pressure Iran

(Reuters) – China and Britain agree on pressing Iran about its nuclear activities while seeking engagement, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said on Monday at the start of a visit to China that is likely to focus on the dispute.

World | China

Miliband said the two powers — both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — shared an interest in ensuring Tehran abides by Security Council resolutions seeking to curb the “real threat” of its nuclear activities.

“Britain and China have not only agreed on the goal that Iran should respect the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but also respect that we need to keep a combination of engagement and pressure,” Miliband told reporters at the Shanghai World Expo site, shortly before flying to Beijing.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the pact seeking to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons beyond the formally recognized nuclear-armed states, including China and Britain.

But despite Miliband’s upbeat comments, his talks in Beijing about Iran — one of China’s major oil suppliers — could be one of the most difficult parts of his three-day trip.

Western powers want China to approve a proposed U.N. resolution imposing new sanctions on Tehran, which they say is seeking the means to make nuclear weapons and has violated non-proliferation safeguards.

Beijing however has previously resisted calls for harsh sanctions against Iran. And as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, it has the power to veto any resolution.

Miliband’s meetings in the Chinese capital include one with Premier Wen Jiabao, when they will discuss “how we can address the real threat that the Iranian nuclear program poses to international stability and security,” the foreign minister said during an afternoon visit to a training center for peacekeeping police outside Beijing.

Tehran denies that its nuclear program is aimed at developing weapons and says it wants to enrich uranium to power planned electricity plants.

GREATER OPENNESS

Miliband also urged China to do more to open its economy and improve intellectual property rights protections.

“Foreign investors seek transparency and fair competition so they can be confident in their investment,” Miliband said.

China and Britain have recently sparred over climate change negotiations and Beijing’s stance on human rights, after China executed a Briton for drug smuggling, although his family said there was convincing evidence that he was mentally ill.

“We don’t pretend to agree on everything,” said Miliband. “Our relationship is one of many layers and one of growing strength and growing engagement.”

(Editing by Emma Graham-Harrison)

Russia too blasts Ahmadinejad’s ‘Holocaust-a myth’ remark

Jerusalem, Sep 20 (ANI): Following the US and UK deploring Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s ‘Holocaust- a myth’ remark, Russia too has called his statement “totally unacceptable.”

The Jerusalem Post quoted Russian foreign ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko as saying that “such statements, wherever they come from, contradict the truth and are totally unacceptable.”

“Attempts to rewrite history, especially as the 70th anniversary of the start of World War II is being marked this year, are an offense to the memory of all victims and all those who fought fascism,” Nesterenko added.

On Friday, Ahmadinejad had told a rally in Tehran that the Holocaust was “a false pretext to create Israel.” He also called on all Muslims to confront the “Zionist regime [as] a national and religious duty.”

US ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice had termed Ahmadinejad’s comments as “hateful.”

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was quoted as saying: “Obviously we condemn what he said.”
British Foreign Secretary David Miliband also criticized Ahmadinejad’s ‘myth’ remark.
In a statement communicated by the UK Embassy in Israel, Miliband had said: “Ahmadinejad’s repeated denials of the Holocaust are abhorrent as well as ignorant. It is very important that the world community stands up against this tide of abuse. This outburst is not worthy of the leader of Iran.”
“Iran’s people have a great history and culture. I cannot believe that the vast majority of them want to rewrite this chapter of history rather than focus on the future. The coincidence of today’s comments with the start of Jewish New Year only adds to the insult,” he added. (ANI)

US, Britain deplore Ahmadinejad’s ‘false Holocaust’ remark

Jerusalem, Sep 19 (ANI): The United States and Britain have both condemned Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s recent “hateful” speech in which he had said the Holocaust was “a false pretext to create Israel.”

The Jerusalem Post quoted White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, as saying: “Obviously we condemn what he said.”

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband also criticized Ahmadinejad’s ‘myth’ remark.

In a statement communicated by the UK Embassy in Israel, Miliband said: “Ahmadinejad’s repeated denials of the Holocaust are abhorrent as well as ignorant. It is very important that the world community stands up against this tide of abuse. This outburst is not worthy of the leader of Iran.”

“Iran’s people have a great history and culture. I cannot believe that the vast majority of them want to rewrite this chapter of history rather than focus on the future. The coincidence of today’s comments with the start of Jewish New Year only adds to the insult,” he added. arlier, Miliband issued a blessing for the Jewish New Year.

“Rosh Hashanah is a time of celebration for Jewish communities in the UK and around the world. A chance to look forward to the coming year and make plans, but also a period of reflection and soul searching,” he had said. (ANI)

One call from Saudi Arabia would seal Musharraf trial seekers’ mouth: PML-Q

Lahore, Sep.2 (ANI): Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) Secretary General Mushahid Hussain Sayed has said that former President General Pervez Musharraf had left the country after inking a deal with the present government regarding not being prosecuted under high treason charges, and that one call from Saudi government would silence Musharraf’s trial seekers.

Speaking on a television chat show, Sayed said only a single telephone call from Saudi Arabia would stop demands for Musharraf’s trial.

While ruling out any involvement of the Armed Forces in the present crisis, he said Musharraf’s trial under Article Six was impossible.

“The present system had no problem from the army or the Inter-Services Intelligence or any so-called secret agencies,” The Daily Times quoted Sayed, as saying.

Commenting on the PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif’s threat to hold a long march demanding Musharraf’s trial, he said Pakistan could ill-afford midterm elections or long marches against the ‘democratic’ government.

Sayed said the country’s leadership should have the courage to decisions on their own rather than depending upon calls from British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs David Miliband or US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke. (ANI)

Britain outraged by inclusion of embassy official in Iran mass trial

London, Aug. 9 (ANI): Troubled relations between Britain and Iran have been further aggravated by the inclusion of a British embassy official at a mass trial in Tehran.

The British Foreign Office has said it was “outraged” that Hossein Rassam, a political analyst with the embassy, was on trial.

It said his appearance in the trials was completely unacceptable and it also contradicts the assurance provided by senior Iranian officials.

“Hossein is a member of our embassy staff going about his legitimate duties. Iranian action against him, and others would only bring further discredit on the Iranian regime,” Sky News quoted David Miliband, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, as saying.

Miliband further said that he was extremely concerned at the unjustified charges which were laid against Rassam.

Rassam was one of nine embassy staff arrested in the wake of protests against the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. (ANI)

Britain to stand by Pak through “thick and thin to help quell terror”: Miliband

Islamabad, July 10 (ANI): Britain would continue its support to Pakistan and stand by the troubled nation through ‘thick and thin’ in its quest to rid the nation of terror, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband has said.

Miliband, who held separate talks with President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani here, assured the leaders that Britain would continue its support to Pakistan to overcome the number of challenges facing the country.

“The United Kingdom will stand by Pakistan through thick and thin to help it succeeds against militancy,” The Daily Times quoted Miliband, as saying.

Commenting on the problems of Swat displaced, who have been forced to vacate their home in the Valley due to the military operation, Miliband assured of Britain’s complete support for the rehabilitation of the internally displaced persons (IDPs).

“The displaced people have rendered immense sacrifices in the war against terror and need more attention of the world,” he said.

During his meeting, Zardari told the British Foreign Secretary that Pakistan’s economy has been greatly affected by the ‘war on terror’, and that it needed more support from both the European Union (EU) and the United States.

Zardari also highlighted the need for greater access for Pakistani products into the EU and US markets.

During their meeting, Gilani told Miliband that reconstruction and rehabilitation work has been started in the war hit Malakand Division of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), and people have started to return to their native places.

Gilani said that capacity building of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) would be one of the prime objectives of the government in the region, in order to enable them to counter extremism effectively after the withdrawal of the security forces.

However, he also said that international promises for the capacity building of LEAs are yet to be fulfilled. (ANI)

Indo-Pak talks only possible if Mumbai accused successfully prosecuted: Miliband

Islamabad, July 9 (ANI): The resumption of the stalled peace talks between India and Pakistan rests on the successful prosecution of the perpetrators of the 26/11 Mumbai carnage, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs David Miliband has said.

Addressing a joint press conference with his Pakistan counterpart Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Miliband said the thaw in Indo-Pak relation is directly related to the trial of the Mumbai terror attack masterminds.

“In respect of the restarting the frozen dialogue process, the key next step is the successful prosecution of the people who are involved in the Mumbai attacks,” The Nation quoted Miliband, as saying.

Miliband said the Mumbai issue is very critical for confidence building between India and Pakistan.

He asked Islamabad to speed-up its probe on the issue, and said that the perpetrators should be duly punished.

“It is important that the Pakistan government moves faster and punishes the culprits if they are found guilty within the Pakistani legal system,” Milibad said.

Commenting on the Kashmir issue, Miliband said that the long pending dispute needed to be resolved with mutual consent.

“The dialogue needs to be held in light of aspirations of Kashmiris and it is needed to resolve the problem with mutual discussion,” he said.

Miliband, who arrived in Multan on a one-day visit on Wednesday, said Britain would continue its support to Pakistan, and added that it will help Islamabad to improve its relationship with the European Union.

Referring to the EU summit held last month, Miliband said: “The historic summit two weeks ago was very important. The whole of the 27 European Union countries and 500 million people are now increasingly focused on Pakistan.”

He rejected reports about British arms falling into the Taliban’s hands, but admitted the fact that there is a general global problem regarding the spread of illegal arms. (ANI)