‘US won’t swallow Pak’s ‘strategic shift’ claims till end of Afghan Haqqani network’

Washington, Mar.27 (ANI): The United States may have described the just concluded strategic dialogue with Pakistan as ‘a new beginning’ in their bilateral relationship, but it would be a mistake to read that as an indication about the long standing trust deficit being bridged.

According to noted Washington Post columnist, David Ignatius, while Pakistan has made certain moves to showcase its commitment to root out militancy from its soil, Islamabad’s relationship with Washington can not turn out to be a truly strategic partnership until the Army takes decisive action against its key long-time ally in Afghanistan, the Haqqani network.

“This is the “trust but verify” detail of the U.S.-Pakistan rapprochement, reminiscent of the U.S.-Soviet détente,” Ignatius said in his article.

“When there is a decisive move to cut them (the Haqqani network) off, the U.S. will see and verify it. At that point, in the minds of the U.S. intelligence chiefs, the strategic shift will truly have taken place and the real celebration can begin,” he said.

Ignatius said he believes that Pakistan is well aware of the fact that any peace talks in Afghanistan would fail unless they include all parties to the conflict, including elements of the fearsome Haqqani group.

However, Pakistan, is also eager to hop on to the ‘US powered peace train’ for Kabul before it gets too late in order to safeguard its cause in the region, he said. (ANI)

US media sees Zardari as weak and uncertain leader

Washington, Apr.12 (ANI): Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari may have some how managed to stick to his post during the recent political chaos in the country, but the US media sees him as a weak and uncertain leader.

According to a member of the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, Matthew Kaminski, Zardari seems to be reluctant to declare an all out war against the extremists in the tribal region of the country, who have created havoc across the region.

“He is politically weak, and sounds disinclined to push the military to wage war against the Pashtun tribes in the mountains,” Dawn reported Kaminski, as writing.

According to a senior Washington Post writer David Ignatius, Zardari give an impression of an accidental President.

“On some major security and intelligence issues, he claimed no knowledge or sought to shift blame to others, and the overall impression was of an accidental president who still has an uncertain grasp on power,” Ignatius viewed.

He pointed out that the gap between the Pakistani officials’ comments in public and their acceptance in private was a major problem.

“Pakistani leaders know the Predator attacks help combat the Taliban in remote Waziristan, but they don’t want to seem like American lackeys. So they protest in public the very strategy they have privately endorsed,” Ignatius said.

Joe Klein of the Time magazine, who also interviewed Zardari along with Kaminski and Ignatius recently, termed Zardari’s regime as ‘fragile’ and said that the Pak presidency was unwilling to admit the extent of the problem confronting the country.

In the interview, Zardari had squarely blamed the eight year long US led war in Afghanistan for Pakistan’s prevailing condition.

“They (Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar) were pushed into Pakistan by your great military offensive in Afghanistan. For eight years nothing has happened and now we are weak and you are unable to do anything about it, in eight years you haven’t been able to eliminate the cancer,” Zardari had said.

The journalists, however, agreed that Zardari has a clear point of view regarding threat perception emanating from the western borders along Afghanistan, but he is unwilling to allow US military onto Pakistani soil. (ANI)