UPDATE 2-India’s Reliance Natural plunges after share swap deal

MUMBAI, July 5 (Reuters) – India’s Reliance Natural (RENR.BO) shed more than a quarter of its value on Monday, after a deal to fold into sister firm Reliance Power (RPOL.BO) valued the company at $1.5 billion, or 31 percent below its Friday closing price.

The companies, both controlled by Indian billionaire Anil Ambani, said on Sunday Reliance Natural Resources (RNRL) shareholders would receive one Reliance Power share for every four they hold. [ID:nSGE663015]

Reliance Natural lost a May ruling by India’s highest court in a gas supply dispute with Reliance Industries (RELI.BO), controlled by Anil’s elder brother, Mukesh Ambani, the world’s fourth-richest man.

Analysts say there was no reason for Reliance Natural to exist independently following the court’s verdict as it would not receive gas at a cheaper rate than the government-approved price.

“The merger was a given, it was just a matter of time,” said Sonam Udasi, head of research at IDBI Capital.

“RNRL was just a shell company, and after the court verdict, it couldn’t have sold gas at a lower price, so it had to be absorbed,” he said.

Based on Friday’s closing price of Reliance Power and the number of outstanding shares of Reliance Natural, the deal values Reliance Natural at about $1.5 billion, or about 43.80 rupees a share, compared with its closing price of 63.65 rupees on Friday, according to Reuters calculations.

By 0609 GMT, shares in Reliance Natural were down 27.3 percent at 46.25 rupees, after falling to 45.50, their lowest since May 21. Reliance Power was up 2.5 percent at 179.60 rupees, after climbing to 189.80, its highest in more than a year.

About 5.6 million shares were traded in Reliance Power, more than double the stock’s average trading volume over the past 30 days. About 10.9 million shares of Reliance Natural were traded versus with their 30-day average trading volume of 12.9 million.

Reliance Natural had wanted Reliance Industries to honour a private deal between the brothers, struck when the Reliance empire was split, to supply it with 28 million standard cubic metres of gas for 17 years at $2.34, about half the government-set price.

India’s Supreme Court ordered the companies to renegotiate the agreement at the government-approved price.

Late last month, Reliance Natural and Reliance Industries said they signed a revised gas supply agreement, but did not disclose details. [ID:nSGE65O09O]

The gas is critical for Anil Ambani’s power business, including projects being built by Reliance Power. Reliance Power went public in early 2008 in a $2.9 billion IPO — India’s biggest — but has never risen above its issue price.

“RNRL’s share in CBM (coal-bed methane) blocks, and proposed coal supply logistics and shipping business plans, are still nascent and will not contribute materially to earnings of the merged entity in the medium term,” JPMorgan analysts said in a note. The merger would dilute earnings at Reliance Power, the note said.

Reliance Industries operates the country’s biggest gas find, in the D6 block of the Krishna Godavari basin off India’s east coast. The government determines who gets the gas from the field and at what price. (Additional reporting by Ami Shah and Sumeet Chatterjee; Editing by Ranjit Gangadharan)

Man sentenced to death for China school stabbings

June 11 (Reuters) – A court in southern China has handed down the death sentence to a man for stabbing 16 students and a teacher in primary school in April, state media reported on Friday.

More than 27 people have died and at least 80 injured since March in a wave of school stabbings, prompting calls for better protection of students and worries about the social malaise that some see underneath China’s rapid economic growth. [ID:nTOE64B03T]

Chen Kangbing, a middle-aged former teacher, broke into a school in the southern city of Leizhou with a knife on April 28, stabbing 16 students and one teacher on the same day another man was executed for stabbing eight students to death. [ID:nTOE63R09O]

Chen was charged with and convicted of murder, even though no one died during his stabbing spree, the official Xinhua News Agency said.

“Chen hacked at the children and teacher in a very cruel manner, causing great harm,” Xinhua cited the court verdict as saying.

The China News Service, in a separate report, said Chen had decided to take revenge on the school after he thought some students were laughing at him while he wandered alone in a local square.

At least three people have been sentenced to death so far this year for school stabbings. One has already been executed. (Reporting by Huang Yan and Ben Blanchard; Editing by Sugita Katyal)

After rap, sports ministry tells Hockey India to put elections on hold

The sports ministry on Tuesday asked Hockey India not to proceed with its elections, scheduled to be held in mid-June, until legal opinion was sought about the same. Last Friday, a Delhi High Court verdict restored administrative authority to the KPS Gill-led Indian Hockey Federation, slamming the sports ministry and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) for arbitrary suspension of the IHF and establishing Hockey India in 2008.

The ministry instructions have put Hockey India in a spot who, after initial bravado dismissed the verdict and insisted their right to govern hockey in the country, now have to rethink their future plans. “In the light of the High Court judgment in the matter of Indian Hockey Federation vs UOI & others, you are advised not to take further action with regard to holding of elections till the entire matter is examined in consultation with Ministry of Law,” the ministry letter, addressed to HI secretary Narinder Batra, states.

So far, in the absence of any official reaction from either the ministry or the IOA, Batra had been claiming that the IHF was a defunct body and HI, recognised by the international hockey federation (FIH), was the sole governing authority for hockey in India. “We are an autonomous body and recognised by the FIH. The high court order does not affect us and HI will continue working as usual,” Batra had said.

However, legal experts have already termed Hockey India as an illegal entity after the judgement. “What Batra seems to be forgetting is that the FIH recognition is subjective to recognition from the national Olympic committee; in this case, the IOA. Once the court verdict has termed the suspension of IHF illegal and restored it as the duly recognised body by the IOA, the very existence of HI is untenable,” advocate Rahul Mehra, at the forefront of trying to bring accountability to federations, said.

Also, while Batra had been claiming that elections to HI will be held in mid-June in the presence of a government observer and a retired judge as the returning officer, it is interesting to note that the sports ministry has already stated in court that they do not recognise the current set-up of HI.

“I have three separate affidavits by the sports ministry to the court, which clearly states that they do not recognise HI as the authority to run the sport. As on date, Batra can only claim recognition from FIH, which is again subject to recognition from the IOA. As a private entity, they can do anything; as a national sports federation, legally, Hockey India is an illegal body and any action by it would be termed illegal,” Mehra said.

A sports ministry official said: “We have written to Hockey India to ensure there is no violation of the court order. If they still continue to go ahead, we will not be a party to any action that will clearly be a contempt of court,” the official said.

FIH muddle

In fact, Hockey India’s position has become even more unenviable after an FIH letter which clearly states that elections have to be held on or before July 5. The letter, circulated just hours before the official communiqué from the ministry, states that, “… provided that elections are held on or before 5 July, 2010; thereafter Hockey India is and remains the sole governing body for hockey in India.”

Ministry officials claimed ignorance of the same and said that, “the FIH cannot unilaterally take a decision on this issue in contravention of court judgement. For one, their recognition is based on ours and IOA’s recognition; and secondly, they are not a party to the verdict but Hockey India is directly affected and can be hauled up,” officials said.

Rathore files review petition before Punjab and Haryana High Court

Chandigarh, May 26 (ANI):Haryana’s former Director General of Police (DGP) SPS Rathore, who was sentenced to a 18-month prison term in connection with the Ruchika Girhotra molestation case on Tuesday, on Wednesday filed a petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking review of the District Sessions Court verdict.

Rathore”s lawyer-wife Abha Rathore filed the review petition on his behalf in the court of Justice S S Saron. She also requested bail for Rathore.

In the petition, Abha Rathore alleged that the Sessions Court had passed the order under media pressure.

Rathore was jailed on Tuesday after the Chandigarh District Sessions Court enhanced his jail term to 18 months.

In the petition, Abha Rathore also sought to appraise the court about her husband’s heart ailment. (ANI)

Khushboo likely to join DMK

Chennai, May 14 (ANI): Popular south Indian actress Khushboo is all set to enter into politics by joining Tamil Nadu’s ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazagam (DMK).

Khushboo who was given the all clear by the Supreme Court on her controversial statement on pre-marital sex, is expected to meet DMK president and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi on Friday evening.

After meeting Karunanidhi, Khushboo is likely to make her announcement.

Khushboo reportedly held two rounds of discussions with some DMK leaders and would have another round in a couple of days.

The DMK is likely to consider her name for the State Legislative Council.

After the apex court verdict, she had hinted her intention to test her luck in politics.

“I am silently involved in lot of social work including in the areas of HIV/AIDS, transgenders and cancer. But being in politics gives a larger platform and to work better,” Khushboo had said.

Khushboo”s entry into the DMK is likely to be a shot in the arm for the party ahead of the Assembly polls.

Tamil Nadu likely to go polls sometime in mid-2011.

Khushboo, who has acted in all four South Indian languages, enjoys a large fan following in the state.

Her fans had even built a temple for her in Permabalur District at the height of her career a few years ago. (ANI)

Moily rules out amending Hindu Marriage Act to accommodate Khaps

New Delhi, May 11 (ANI): Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily on Tuesday ruled out amending the Hindu Marriage Act in order to accommodate the Khap Panchayat”s demands.

“We have suggested to amend the simple marriage act, not the Hindu Marriage Act, he added.”

Moily comment comes just a day after Congress MP and industrialist Navin Jindal said that he had never said anything to support the honour killings committed by the Khap Panchayats.

Earlier, Jindal has reportedly come out in support of the Haryana Khap Panchayats.

It has been reported that Jindal, who is currently abroad, sent a letter to the Khap Panchayats on Sunday affirming his support to them on the issue.

The self-styled Khap Panchayats gathered in Kurukshetra on April 13 and demanded a ban on marriages within the same ””gotra”” or sub caste.

They also protested against a Karnal Sessions Court verdict that awarded death sentences to five accused and a life-term to the leader of a Khap Panchayat for the murder of a newly-married couple.

Representatives of at least 20 Khap Panchayats from Haryana challenged the court ruling and said they would raise money to help the killers of the newly married couple.

They said they wanted the ””Hindu Marriage Act”” to be amended, to include a law that bans marriages within same sub caste or the same village. (ANI)

Naveen Jindal comes out in support of Khap Panchayats

New Delhi, May 10 (ANI): Congress MP and industrialist Naveen Jindal has reportedly come out in support of the Haryana Khap Panchayats, who have been demanding an amendment to the ”Hindu Marriage Act”.

It has been reported that Jindal, who is currently abroad, sent a letter to the Khap Panchayats on Sunday affirming his support to them on the issue.

The self-styled Khap Panchayats gathered in Kurukshetra on April 13 and demanded a ban on marriages within the same ”gotra” or sub caste.

They also protested against a Karnal Sessions Court verdict that awarded death sentences to five accused and a life-term to the leader of a Khap Panchayat for the murder of a newly-married couple.

Representatives of at least 20 Khap Panchayats from Haryana challenged the court ruling and said they would raise money to help the killers of the newly married couple.

They said they wanted the ”Hindu Marriage Act” to be amended, to include a law that bans marriages within same sub caste or the same village.

They issued an ultimatum for a firm decision within two months, adding that they would form a panel to protect their traditions. (ANI)

SC upholds selected UPSC candidates right to quota benefits

New Delhi, May 7 (ANI): A five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Friday upheld the constitutional validity of a Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) rule allowing merit list candidates belonging to reserved category to avail the quota benefit while choosing posts.

The bench consisting of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices S H Kapadia, R V Raveendran, B Sudershan Reddy and P Sathasivam set aside an earlier Madras High Court judgment on the issue.

The court passed the order on a special leave petition filed by the Centre challenging the Madras High Court verdict.

“Such migrations of reserved category candidates taking the benefit of reservation even after making into merit list is not inconsistent with the provision of the Constitution….Appeals are allowed,” the court said in its judgment.

Earlier, the Madras High Court had ordered that if a candidate from reserve category vacates his place in a general category merit list in civil services examination conducted by the UPSC and opts to prop up his position by opting for caste-based benefit, then the vacant general category seat should go to a reserved category candidate. (ANI)

Jessica Lall case: SC upholds Delhi High Court verdict on Manu Sharma

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the verdict given by the Delhi High Court in the model Jessica Lall murder case, convicting prime accused Manu Sharma to life imprisonment.

On February 8, a bench of the apex court consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved its verdict for April 19.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi on April 29, 1999.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Earlier, on February 21, 2006, the trial court verdict had acquitted Sharma.

Sharma had challenged the conviction in the apex court.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Sharma, had argued that the judgment was pre-determined to hold the appellant guilty as one of the judges refused to withdraw from the bench.

Narrating the sequence of events, Jethmalani alleged that from everyday hearing, it was clear that the bench was going to reverse the acquittal by the trial court.

The High Court judgment was ‘nothing but perverse” and every finding of the trial court was rejected, he said.

Appearing for the Delhi Government, Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam, justified the conviction and submitted that there was sufficient evidence to convict and sentence Sharma to a life term. (ANI)

Jessica Lall case: SC upholds Delhi High Court verdict on Manu Sharma

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the verdict given by the Delhi High Court in the model Jessica Lall murder case, convicting prime accused Manu Sharma to life imprisonment.

On February 8, a bench of the apex court consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swantanter Kumar had reserved its verdict for April 19.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi on April 29, 1999.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Earlier, on February 21, 2006, the trial court verdict had acquitted Sharma.

Sharma had challenged the conviction in the apex court.

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Sharma, had argued that the judgment was pre-determined to hold the appellant guilty as one of the judges refused to withdraw from the bench.

Narrating the sequence of events, Jethmalani alleged that from everyday hearing, it was clear that the bench was going to reverse the acquittal by the trial court.

The High Court judgment was ‘nothing but perverse” and every finding of the trial court was rejected, he said.

Appearing for the Delhi Government, Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam, justified the conviction and submitted that there was sufficient evidence to convict and sentence Sharma to a life term. (ANI)

Thai PM ropes in Army Chief to quash Red Shirts’ challenge

Bangkok, Apr 17 (ANI): Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has said that Army Chief General Anupong Paojinda would replace Deputy Prime Minister Suthep Thaugsuban as head of the Centre for the Resolution of Emergency Situations (CRES).

The decision follows the failed attempt to arrest the “Red Shirt” leaders at a city hotel on Friday.

Vejjajiva said that General Paojinda will take charge of the operations to suppress and prevent acts of terrorism, and emphasized that the “unsuccessful efforts taken so far” against the protesters had prompted the government to “review structural issues”.

The announcement came as tens of thousands of anti-government protesters remained camped out in central Bangkok.

Some observers, however, believe the change of guard at the security centre could widen rifts between the government and the army, The Bangkok Post reports.

An army source said that the Thai Government’s move is intended to “force” General Paojinda to take tough action against the Red Shirts.

The Red-Shirt protesters are demanding that Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva should dissolve the parliament and call fresh elections.

They support fugitive ex-premier Thaksin Shinawatra and accuse the government of elitism and being undemocratic, as it came to power after a parliamentary vote that followed a court verdict ousting Thaksin’s allies.

Last weekend, the government had tried unsuccessfully to clear protesters from a part of the city. The failed crackdown left 23 people dead and more than 800 injured.

Meanwhile, leaders of “Red Shirt” said that they would surrender to police next month, but refused to end their rally in Bangkok.

“On May 15, 24 of us will surrender. All of the leaders. For now the 24 of us will keep rallying to show sincerely that we won’t run away,” said Nattawut Saikuar, one of the top Red Shirts. (ANI)

Court verdict on Kasab on May 3

Mumbai, Mar 31 (ANI): A Mumbai Special Court on Wednesday said it would announce the verdict on Ajmal Amir Kasab on May 3.

Over a year after the 26/11 attacks,case began in a special court here.

The trial of the lone Pakistani gunman Ajmal Kasab, and two Indians charged with taking part in the conspiracy concluded on Wednesday.

Special judge M L Tahaliyani would pronounce verdict on May 3.

The prosecution examined over 650 witnesses to prove their case that Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) carried out attacks by sending 10 terrorists from Karachi.

The court also examined four witnesses, including two from the elite National Security Guard (NSG) commandos, who led the teams in operations to fight the terrorists.

On February 26, 2008 police filed the chargesheet and the case was committed from magistrate”s court to a sessions court on March 9, 2009.

A separate court was established in high security Arthur Road Central Jail to hear the case.

On April 17, Kasab had pleaded that he was a juvenile, but the court rejected his claim after examining prosecution witnesses and experts and ruled that he was above 20 years.

Earlier this month, Special public prosecutor Ujawal Nikam opened arguments and said there was evidence to suggest that the 26/11 attack was a state sponsored terrorism by Pakistan.(ANI)

Nepal Vice President’s position defunct from today

Kathmandu, Aug 31 (ANI): Paramananda Jha’s position as Nepal Vice President has become defunct from Monday with Jha’s refusal to take oath in Nepali within the deadline given by the Supreme Court.

Rejecting the Supreme Court ruling that ordered him to take fresh oath in Nepali, Vice President Jha has declared that he will decide whether to retake the oath only if the Constitution is amended.

“The situation is that the mother language of Nepalis people so far has not been respected by the previous decisions of the Supreme Court and the government level. Thus, I can think about the issue of oath-taking only after the government and the Constituent Assembly (CA) honours the mother languages,” Nepalnews quoted him as, saying.

He also criticized the Supreme Court’s order to him to re-take oath in Nepali or else vacate his post.

He called the Supreme Court’s verdict ‘prejudiced’ and against the tenet and spirit of the interim Constitution and said it serves no purpose other than to start a “language war” as it is against the basic right of the people “to take oath in his own mother tongue”.

He also complained that some political parties supported the “anti-constitution” decision by staying quiet.

Supreme Court had issued a verdict on August 25 ordering him to take oath in Nepali within a week and that failure to do so would render his position defunct.

According to the court verdict, Jha cannot perform any duty of the Vice President and that he is not entitled to special security and privileges given to him as the Vice President. (ANI)

Bombay HC accepts Ansari’s petition challenging POTA court verdict

Mumbai, Aug 28(ANI): The Bombay High Court Friday admitted an appeal filed by suspected Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) member Ashrat Ansari challenging capital punishment awarded to him by a POTA (Prevention of Anti Terrorism Act) court.

The POTA court had sentenced Hanif Sayed Anees (46), his wife Fahmida (43) and Ashrat Ansari (32), for their role in implementing the plans of LeT.

They were also sentenced for creating terror in India through bomb attacks.

The 2003 bomb blast near Gateway of India and Zaveri Bazar and in a bus killed over 50 people.

The bench of the High Court comprising of Justice Bilal Nazki and Justice A R Joshi asked the Maharashtra government to produce Ansari and two other convicts Hanif Sayed and his wife Fahmida on the next hearing.

The bench fixed the next hearing after eight weeks.

Meanwhile, the POTA court has made a reference to the High Court to confirm the death penalty awarded to the three convicts.

The bench has also directed the Maharashtra Government to produce the case papers and the verdict of the POTA court before it. (ANI)

PM says court’s verdict on Article 377 to be discussed with cabinet

On Board special flight, July 11 (ANI): Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has said the matter related to the Delhi High Court’s ruling on gay sex legalization will be discussed with his cabinet colleagues to seek their views in this regard.

Addressing a press conference onboard after attending the G8-G5 Summit at L’Aquila in Italy, Dr. Singh said, “I haven’t discussed the matter with my cabinet colleagues. Therefore, when I will go back, I will seek their views as to which anything further needs to be done or said in this regard.”

In a landmark verdict on July 2, the Delhi High Court legalized the homosexual behavior of consensual youths, which received a lot of opposition from the religious leaders.

It was earlier a criminal offence under Section 377 of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

On July 9, a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice K. G. Balkrishnan and Justice P Sathasivam issued notice to the Union Government to explain its stand on a petition challenging the Delhi High Court’s ruling.

The apex court posted the matter for hearing on July 20.

The Bench said that any interim order against the High Court verdict, if necessary, would be considered only after hearing the parties concerned.

The Bench also said they would hear the opinions of all the parties concerned before giving any interim order in this matter.

The apex court was hearing a plea filed by Suresh Kumar Kaushal, an astrologer. Notices were also issued to NAZ Foundation, and other respondents who were parties before the Delhi High Court. By Naveen Kapoor (ANI)

Gay ruling unites diverse religious leaders

New Delhi, July 9(ANI): Religious leaders from Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Sikh and Christian communities met in the national capital on Thursday to vehemently oppose the July 2 ruling of the Delhi High Court, which has been hailed by sections of the media and sociologists as a landmark court verdict towards legalizing same sex relationships.

They expressed concern that the ruling that gay sex was no longer a crime would erode moral values and Indian ethos.

“This is a conspiracy to finish the country’s moral values and they are a part of it. We should be watchful and make sure an atmosphere is created sustaining our moral values and also avoiding such acts to take place,” said Maulana Syed Jalaluddin Umari, president of Jamaat- e-Islami Hind.

Father Dominic Emmanuel, Director of Delhi Catholic Archdiocese, said though they “sympathize” with the sexual minorities and would not want them hounded as “criminals”, yet a legal immunity would be implied as promoting “unnatural” sexual relationships.

“I feel there is only a technical difference in it. Even they (religious leaders) say we do not consider them as criminals and express our full sympathy towards them (gays). But I feel in all religions it is considered a crime as it is unnatural,” Emmanuel said.

Shankara Acharya Omkar Anandji claimed gay sex would place mankind on the path to doom.

“We believe that the ruling should be annulled else our future generations will be finished,” said Anandji. (ANI)

Protest against Delhi High Court decision on Article 377 on homosexuality in Delhi

New Delhi, July 5 (ANI): A group of Sikh and Hindu activists staged a demonstration in the national capital to protest the Delhi High Court’s recent verdict on Article 377.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday decriminalised Article 377, allowing consensual sex between persons of same gender above 18 years of age.

Members of National Akali Dal along with members of Santan Dharam Sabha, a Hindu organisation, staged the protest and demanded government authorities to step in to prevent passing of the law.

“We are planning to meet the President and the Home Minister. If we do not get assurance from them within a week we will move to the Supreme Court and contest our case there,” Manohar Lal Kumar, one of the activists said.

The current law bans “sex against the order of nature,” and is widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex in India.

The court’s decision to overturn a British colonial era law on same-gender sex dismayed various religious groups but led to a wave of delight among gay activists and health workers.

The verdict can still be challenged in the Supreme Court.

The 1861 law prohibiting “sex against the order of nature”-widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex-has not yet been repealed and carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years.

Petitions to change the 1861 law have so far been firmly rejected by the Governments previously. But there has been some softening up on the stand recently with some ministers suggesting the possibility of revoking the ban was being discussed.

Thursday’s court verdict came after nine years of legal proceedings initiated by India’s gay groups. (ANI)

Protest against Delhi High Court decision on Article 377 staged in Delhi

New Delhi, July 5 (ANI): A group of Sikh and Hindu activists staged a demonstration in the national capital to protest the Delhi High Court’s recent verdict on Article 377.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday decriminalised Article 377, allowing consensual sex between persons of same gender above 18 years of age.

Members of National Akali Dal along with members of Santan Dharam Sabha, a Hindu organisation, staged the protest and demanded government authorities to step in to prevent passing of the law.

“We are planning to meet the President and the Home Minister. If we do not get assurance from them within a week we will move to the Supreme Court and contest our case there,” Manohar Lal Kumar, one of the activists said.

The current law bans “sex against the order of nature,” and is widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex in India.

The court’s decision to overturn a British colonial era law on same-gender sex dismayed various religious groups but led to a wave of delight among gay activists and health workers.

The verdict can still be challenged in the Supreme Court.

The 1861 law prohibiting “sex against the order of nature”-widely interpreted to mean homosexual sex-has not yet been repealed and carries a prison sentence of up to 10 years.

Petitions to change the 1861 law have so far been firmly rejected by the Governments previously. But there has been some softening up on the stand recently with some ministers suggesting the possibility of revoking the ban was being discussed.

Thursday’s court verdict came after nine years of legal proceedings initiated by India’s gay groups. (ANI)

Allahabad High Court stalls Ganga Expressway project

Allahabad, May 30 (ANI): The Allahabad High Court has barred the Uttar Pradesh Government from proceeding ahead on the ambitious eight-laned Ganga Expressway project and directed the concerned authorities to obtain prior clearance from environmental board.

A bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhusan and Justice Arun Tandon on Friday passed this order on the petition filed by two voluntary organisations, which questioned the environmental feasibility of the project.

The Court has stayed further work on over 1000 kilometres long project that would connect the eastern and western boundaries of Uttar Pradesh because of environmental concerns.

“The Allahabad High Court has restrained the proceedings of The Ganga-Express way, the 1100 kilometre long expressway from Noida to Ballia because of environmental issues. The project was started by the Mayawati government,” said Arun Kumar Gupta, counsel for petitioners.

Further he informed that court has also asked the state government to obtain clearance from the state-level Environment Impact Assessment Authority.The High Court has also quashed the earlier environmental clearance granted by the Environmental Protection Authority. The court also directed UP government not to proceed with the highway project unless and until it obtains a due clearance from the state-level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA),” Gupta added.

Meanwhile, the petitioners welcomed the court verdict.

“The condition of pollution in Uttar Pradesh is already alarming.

So how anyone can grant permission for 32 new cities and eight new SEZ (Special Economic Zones)? Taking into consideration all these, the Ganga Mahasabha had filed a petition in the High Court. We are extremely happy that the court has come up with a 93 page order. This is the victory of devotees of River Ganga,” said Jitendranand Swami, a petitioner. (ANI)

Swedish court orders jail term for the four defendants in the Pirate Bay case

A Swedish court has finally handed down its verdict to the four defendants in the Internet file-sharing case! Each of the four – Peter Sunde, Frederik Neij, and Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, and Carl Lundstrom, – has been sentenced to a one-year jail term. The court has also ordered them to make a 30-million kronor payment in damages to top entertainment companies, like Warner Bros, EMI, Columbia Pictures, and Sony Music Entertainment.

The ‘notorious’ four, who were associated with the Internet file-sharing service The Pirate Bay, were found guilty of violating copyright law. The court said that the accused had aided copyright infringement by operating the site, thereby providing links to countless songs, films, video games and other content and helping users download them.

With the kind of attention that the case drew from media companies as well as Internet users, particularly because of the enormous size of The Pirate Bay, boasting 20 million users, the court verdict spells a glitzy triumph for the music and movie industries in their efforts to curb online piracy.

Meanwhile, Rickard Falkvinge, leader of The Pirate Party, expressing his disappointment at the verdict told BBC that the sentence was “a gross injustice.” He added: “This wasn’t a criminal trial, it was a political trial. It is just gross beyond description that you can jail four people for providing infrastructure!”