Vivendi could face $1.7 billion fine in Brazil: report

(Reuters) – Brazil’s securities regulator could fine French media company Vivendi (VIV.PA) as much as 3 billion reais ($1.7 billion) for allegedly committing fraud in its takeover of Brazilian phone company GVT, newspaper Folha de S. Paulo said on Sunday, without noting how it obtained the information.

The regulator, known as CVM, found that Vivendi had purchased less than the minimum 40 percent stake in GVT when it announced it won control of the Brazilian company last November, Folha reported. Vivendi may have the option of reaching a settlement with the CVM, the newspaper reported.

The fine could be the largest ever imposed by the Brazilian securities regulator, according to Folha, which did not give a timetable for an announcement.

According to Folha, CVM argued that Vivendi probably misled Telefonica and other investors by signaling that it had won control of GVT before it actually had. Vivendi paid 7.7 billion reais for GVT, the fixed-line and data services carrier that is Brazil’s fastest-growing telecommunications company.

“Any talk of a fine is a conjecture,” Simon Gillham, Vivendi’s executive vice president of global communications, told Reuters in a phone interview from Paris. “Vivendi prides itself on its standards of corporate governance.”

Vivendi abided by the Brazilian laws throughout the process that led to the purchase of GVT, Gillham said, adding that the company has not been notified of any decision by CVM. The French company met all legal and regulatory standards during the acquisition process, he said.

The company has until mid-September to turn over to the CVM all the documents related to the GVT transaction, he noted.

Calls made to the mobile phones of two CVM spokeswomen seeking comment on the Folha story were not immediately answered.

Federal prosecutors are awaiting a CVM decision whether to open a probe against Vivendi on the deal, Folha reported.

(Reporting by Guillermo Parra-Bernal, editing by Maureen Bavdek)

Vivendi could face $1.7 bln fine in Brazil-report

SAO PAULO, July 25 (Reuters) – Brazil’s securities regulator could fine French media company Vivendi (VIV.PA) as much as 3 billion reais ($1.7 billion) for allegedly committing fraud in its takeover of Brazilian phone company GVT, newspaper Folha de S. Paulo said on Sunday, without noting how it obtained the information.

The regulator, known as CVM, found that Vivendi had purchased less than the minimum 40 percent stake in GVT when it announced it won control of the Brazilian company last November, Folha reported. Vivendi may have the option of reaching a settlement with the CVM, the newspaper reported.

The fine could be the largest ever imposed by the Brazilian securities regulator, according to Folha, which did not give a timetable for an announcement.

According to Folha, CVM argued that Vivendi probably misled Telefonica and other investors by signaling that it had won control of GVT before it actually had. Vivendi paid 7.7 billion reais for GVT, the fixed-line and data services carrier that is Brazil’s fastest-growing telecommunications company.

“Any talk of a fine is a conjecture,” Simon Gillham, Vivendi’s executive vice president of global communications, told Reuters in a phone interview from Paris. “Vivendi prides itself on its standards of corporate governance.”

Vivendi abided by the Brazilian laws throughout the process that led to the purchase of GVT, Gillham said, adding that the company has not been notified of any decision by CVM. The French company met all legal and regulatory standards during the acquisition process, he said.

The company has until mid-September to turn over to the CVM all the documents related to the GVT transaction, he noted.

Calls made to the mobile phones of two CVM spokeswomen seeking comment on the Folha story were not immediately answered.

Federal prosecutors are awaiting a CVM decision whether to open a probe against Vivendi on the deal, Folha reported. (Reporting by Guillermo Parra-Bernal, editing by Maureen Bavdek)

Aligning the CDP and GRI Guidelines

To standardize the two most widely used mechanisms for corporate emissions reporting, the organizations publish a linkage document comparing indicators and questions.

When the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance earlier this year on disclosure of climate change risks and opportunities at publicly traded companies, the news was met with widespread approval by sustainable investors who had been calling for corporate reporting on climate change for many years.

At the time of the SEC announcement, Lisa Woll, CEO of the Social Investment Forum (SIF), said, “This is perhaps the biggest development so far in the long-term campaign to promote wider sustainability reporting. Today, we renew our call for mandatory corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or sustainability reporting.”

The most widely used mechanisms for corporate reporting of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and climate change are the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), although the GRI Guidelines address broader elements of sustainability reporting of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) factors. At least 2,500 organizations globally use CDP’s questionnaire to report climate change data, while over 1,300 organizations from 64 countries published a GRI-based sustainability report in 2009.

Because climate change reporting is becoming increasingly important, and because considerable overlap exists between GRI’s indicators and CDP’s questions relating to energy consumption and GHG emissions, the two organizations have agreed to collaborate in an effort to standardize the practice. To that end, the two organizations have published a linkage document to coordinate a more efficient reporting mechanism.

The 17-page document consists of a table that “compares the relevant indicators and questions and reveals the similarities as well as the disparities,” according to GRI. According to the linkage document, “This table includes the relevant GRI G3 Profile Disclosures and Performance Indicators (plus Indicator Protocol Compilation section) and relevant CDP questions from the 2010 questionnaire where overlap between the two was found.”

“This will enable reporters to use or adapt the same data in both reporting processes,” the document continued.

GRI is in the process of updating its Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, and plans to incorporate the findings of the linkage document in order to align its new guidelines with those of CDP. In addition, the organizations will collaborate to achieve greater alignment on industry-specific sector questionnaires.

GECINA: Conditions for Accessing the Bond Base Prospectus

PARIS–(Business Wire)–
Regulatory News:

In order to diversify its sources of financing, Gecina (Paris:GFC) has filed
with the French securities regulator (Autorité des marchés financiers, AMF) the
base prospectus of Euro Medium Term Notes (EMTN) for a maximum amount of € 2
billions. The AMF granted its visa number 10-219 on July 5, 2010.

It may be consulted on or downloaded from the following internet sites:

* Gecina (www.gecina.fr), in the “Market transactions” section;
* AMF (www.amf-france.org).

It is also available free of charge to the public on request:

* by mail: Gecina – 16, rue des Capucines, 75002 Paris, France;
* by email: actionnaire@gecina.fr;
* by telephone: 0 800 800 976 (toll-free number only available in France).

The following documents are included in the Reference Document:

* the annual financial report for 2009;
* the Chairman`s report on corporate governance and internal control;
* the statutory auditors’ reports;
* information on the statutory auditors’ fees.

This press release does not constitute a subscription offer.

Gecina, far more than square meters

Gecina owns and manages a diversified portfolio of more than €11.3 billion of
commercial and residential real estate, as well as student residences, logistics
platforms, healthcare facilities and hotels.

The Gecina foundation

Through the commitment shown by its employees to each one of its customers,
Gecina`s strategy is founded on sustainable innovation. To uphold its
commitments, the Gecina Foundation is working to protect the environment and
support all forms of disability.

www.gecina.fr

French limited company (société anonyme) with share capital of 469,366,800.00
euros

Registered office: 14-16, rue des Capucines, 75002 Paris, France

Paris trade and company register: 592 014 476

GECINA CONTACTS
Laurence Chalmet
Tel: +33(0)1 40 40 52 22
or
Régine Willemyns
Tel: +33 (0)1 40 40 62 44

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Private Equity Firm Global Environment Fund Receives 2010 Financial Times Sustainable Investor of the Year Award

CHEVY CHASE, Md.–(Business Wire)–
Private equity firm Global Environment Fund (GEF) has been named the 2010
Sustainable Investor of the Year by the Financial Times. The award was presented
at the Financial Times and IFC Sustainable Banking Conference in London on June
3rd. This is the second straight year that GEF has been selected for the award.

Founded in 1990, GEF is one of the most experienced and successful private
equity firms to focus exclusively on investing globally in emerging companies
whose business operations deliver measurable environmental improvements, cleaner
energy and sustainable management of natural resources. GEF currently manages
approximately US$1 billion in its investment funds.

In accepting the award, Jeffrey Leonard, GEF CEO and co-founder, said, “In a
year when everything in global financial markets was topsy-turvy, GEF is
particularly proud to be singled out as an investment firm that achieves strong
financial returns and makes major contributions to environmental sustainability,
social development and good governance.”

In its citation the judging panel commended GEF as “a leader in demonstrating
that investors can deliver powerful positive environmental impacts while
generating excellent investment returns. In 2009 GEF celebrated its 20th
anniversary and in a year of financial turmoil still secured high levels of
growth and the greatest deployment of investments to date, marrying
sustainability with a determination to bring in superlative returns.”

Since 2006, the Financial Times Sustainable Banking Awards have recognized
financial institutions and institutional investors that are leaders and
innovators in integrating social, environmental and corporate governance into
their core operations. This year GEF was selected as the FT Sustainable Investor
of the Year from among 26 nominees consisting of institutional investment firms
from around the globe.

A complete list of this year`s winners as well as information about the
Financial Times Sustainable Banking Conference can be found at
www.ftconferences.com/sustainablebanking.

About Global Environment Fund

Global Environment Fund is a Chevy Chase, Maryland-based private equity firm
founded in 1990 investing in emerging markets, clean technology, energy
efficiency and timberland in emerging markets. The firm manages approximately
US$1 billion in private equity investments for institutional investors including
university endowments, foundations, fund-of funds, family offices, pension funds
and Developmental Finance Institutions (DFIs). GEF was the 2009 and 2010
Financial Times Sustainable Investor of the Year winner. For more information,
visit www.globalenvironmentfund.com.

About the Financial Times

The Financial Times, one of the world`s leading business news organisations, is
recognised internationally for its authority, integrity and accuracy. Providing
extensive news, comment and analysis, the newspaper is printed at 23 print sites
across the globe, has a daily circulation of 390,203 (ABC figures February 2010)
and a readership of 1.3 million people worldwide. FT.com is the definitive home
for business intelligence on the web, providing an essential source of news,
comment, data and analysis for the global business community. FT.com has over 2
million registered users and 126,281 digital subscribers. For the Financial
Times` website, visit www.ft.com.

About IFC

IFC promotes economic development through the private sector. Working with
business partners, it invests in sustainable private enterprises in developing
countries without accepting government guarantees. It provides equity, long-term
loans, structured finance and risk management products, and advisory services to
its clients. IFC seeks to reach businesses in regions and countries that have
limited access to capital. It provides finance in markets deemed too risky by
commercial investors in the absence of IFC participation and adds value to the
projects it finances through its corporate governance, environmental, and social
expertise. For more information, visit www.ifc.org.

Global Environment Fund
Elizabeth Lewis, Vice President
240-482-8926
elewis@globalenvironmentfund.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

ARC China Presents at The 12th China Venture Capital & Private Equity Forum

SHENZHEN, CHINA, Jun 09 (MARKET WIRE) —
Barry Freeman, a Managing Director in ARC China’s Shanghai office,
presented as a noted speaker at The 12th China Venture Capital & Private
Equity Forum held in Shenzhen, China from June 4-6. ARC China is focused
on investing in China’s domestic consumption-oriented high-growth
enterprises in developing Tier II and III cities.

The 12th China Venture Capital & Private Equity Forum brought together
global investors, entrepreneurs, officials and policy-makers from central
and local governments, as well as experts and professionals, to discuss
the current investment landscape in China. Mr. Freeman discussed ARC
China’s activist investment strategy focused on the Tier II and Tier III
regions of China.

“ARC China feels that the key risks of investing in Chinese public and
private companies are corporate governance, financial transparency, and
control over the exit of our investment,” Mr. Freeman commented. “We
require an active role in these three areas for all of our portfolio
companies. ARC China has found Chinese entrepreneurs to be very receptive
to our advice as they understand the long-term, mutually beneficial value
that is created by implementing systems and processes supporting these
key areas.”

The Forum was hosted by the Central Committee of China National
Democratic Construction Association, the Ministry of Science and
Technology, People’s Government of Guangdong Province, and People’s
Government of Shenzhen Municipality. For more information please visit
www.cvcri.com.

About ARC China

ARC China is an investment firm focused on investments in
entrepreneur-owned small and medium sized enterprises located in Tier II
and Tier III Chinese cities. We seek to create value for our investors
and companies we invest in by applying our professional experience and
relationships to help companies upgrade their management teams,
technology, systems, and business processes. Our team of experienced
investment professionals and in-house due diligence analysts deploy a
proven and unique on-the-ground activist investment strategy of making
value-oriented highly involved, exit-driven equity investments in a
diversified portfolio of domestic consumption-focused high-growth Chinese
businesses. We also provide various financial advisory services, for both
inbound and outbound China transactions. For more information, please
visit http://www.arcchina.cn.

Contact:

Adam Roseman
ARC China 262 Des Voeux Road Central
23 on the Bund
The Bank of China Building, 14th Floor
23 Zhongshan East No.1 Road
Shanghai 200002, P.R. China
Phone: +86 21 6323 1717
Email: info@arcchina.cn

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

Donald Neville Joins Reddwerks as SVP & CFO

AUSTIN, TX, Jun 01 (MARKET WIRE) —
Reddwerks, a leading supplier of warehouse performance management
software and solutions, today announced that Donald Neville has joined
the company as SVP & CFO. Neville brings over 20 years of financial
management experience in the technology sector in a number of leading
technology companies.

“We are extremely pleased to announce Don joining our team,” said Jean
Belanger, CEO/Founder of Reddwerks. “In spite of the economic
uncertainties we face today, we continue to grow at a very rapid pace and
so we will be raising capital later this year. Don has raised total
capital of over $140M acting as CFO and has never failed to deliver for
his companies. As we continue to attract more and more Tier One users to
our mission critical enterprise infrastructure software, our customers
expect rock-solid performance from our software and solutions and a rock
solid balance sheet as we manage our growth properly. Don has the
experience and proven success record that will allow us to continue to
grow systematically to major vendor status.”

Don was most recently EVP & CFO of Argyle Security, a public company
located in San Antonio, TX that provides electronic security solutions
with annual sales of $135 million, where he raised over $55 million in
new capital and supervised the company’s corporate governance and SOX
compliance initiatives. From 2004 to 2007 he was CFO of ClearCube
Technology in Austin where he raised over $70 million in new capital and
managed their financial team and helped established offices in England,
Mexico, Japan, Singapore and China. Since 1999, Don has been a Partner at
Tatum, the largest CFO-for-hire staffing firm in the US which is now a
division of SFN Group which employs more than 160,000 people annually
through its network. While at Tatum, Don helped a number of technology
companies in Texas including Mall.com and Harvard Technologies raise
capital while managing their financial affairs as interim CFO. From 1988
to 1993 Don was with Deloitte & Touche in New York City where he rose to
Audit Manager and where he obtained his CPA. While at Deloitte & Touche,
Don served multinational clients in financial services,
telecommunications and leveraged buy-out industries and focused on
publicly traded clients and initial public debt and equity offerings for
clients including Merrill Lynch, Donaldson Lufkin Jenrette and Kohlberg
Kravis and Roberts.

Don currently sits on the Board of One World Foods which manufactures and
sells Texas’ Stubbs barbecue sauce across the US. Don received his B.Sc.
(Accounting) from Fordham University in New York and served as Captain in
the U.S. Amy Reserves from 1988 to 2003 where he was trained in nuclear,
biological and chemical warfare.

About Reddwerks
Headquartered in Austin, TX, and with an R&D office in
Guatemala as well as sales in Dallas, Nashville, San Francisco and St.
Louis, Reddwerks is an enterprise infrastructure software company
providing market-leading warehouse performance management (WPM) software
and solutions designed to effectively manage all the labor, equipment and
material flow used in large-scale distribution facilities to process
customer orders. Whether distribution facilities are fulfilling
direct-to-consumer online orders
http://www.reddwerks.com/pressreleases.php?id=042010 or helping retailers
stock their store shelves, Reddwerks WPM software and solutions simplify
interaction with supply chain management (SCM) and warehouse management
system (WMS) software by providing a single interface for all labor and
equipment deployed in large-scale distribution facilities. Regardless of
the SCM or WMS software installed in a facility, Reddwerks WPM increases
productivity to such an extent that clients typically realize a payback
in under one year. Over 60% of Reddwerks’ annual revenues are from
existing customers engaging us in helping them increase productivity
across their distribution network. For more information, visit
www.reddwerks.com.

Vanessa McMillan
Reddwerks Marketing
512-597-6810
www.reddwerks.com

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

How CEO salaries skyrocket

Washington, May 26 (ANI): Compensation benchmarking is the main factor behind the giant leap in CEO salaries over the past two decades, according to a new American research.

Benchmarking is a standard practice in American corporations.

When setting pay, compensation committees use peer groups of executives at comparable firms to establish a “fair” market wage their CEOs.

However, the study, led by sociologist Thomas DiPrete from Columbia University, points out that a few CEOs each year “leapfrog” their peers by getting huge raises that have little to do with the performance of their companies.

Other companies then use the oversized pay of leapfroggers in subsequent benchmarks. Over time, this ratchets up pay for everyone through a “contagion effect.”

DiPrete said: “We show that rising CEO pay is not simply a function of what individual companies do, but is influenced by the behavior of leapfroggers at other firms.”

DiPrete and his colleagues (including a former CEO) used procedures laid out in compensation handbooks to reconstruct likely peer groups for CEOs listed in Standard and Poor”s annual compensation surveys.

They could then look for evidence of leapfrogging in those likely peer groups over time.

Their simulation shows that leapfrogging explains about half of the overall increase in CEO pay from 1992 to 2006.

The researchers say that the finding broadens the debate about what is driving CEO salaries upward.

Opinions on the subject have generally fallen into two camps: those who think CEOs are overpaid because of failures in corporate governance at individual firms, and those who think CEOs are paid what they deserve based on the profits they deliver to shareholders and a “superstar” labor market.

However, this study shows that ill-gotten raises for a few CEOs can lead to “legitimate” pay increases for others.

“[T]he linkages among firms produced by the benchmarking process guarantee that firm-level governance failure becomes a factor in the environment of other firms,” the researchers write.

The study will appear next week in the American Journal of Sociology. (ANI)

Business baulks at executive pay changes

Big business has hit out at the Federal Government over its latest push to rein in huge executive pay packets.

The Government has not only endorsed the Productivity Commission’s inquiry into the way executives are paid, it has gone a step further by proposing a rule that would claw back bonuses from corporate cowboys who fail to deliver on their promises.

The Shareholders Association thinks it is a good idea, but company directors question whether the idea is workable.

Finance Minister Chris Bowen says he plans to introduce the legislation later this year which will force boards to be more accountable and give shareholders more power.

“I think this package does improve shareholder engagement and shareholder say over pay, and it introduces more transparency and minimises conflicts of interest,” he said.

The new laws are based on a recent report from the Productivity Commission. Included in its recommendations is a controversial two-strikes policy.

This means company boards would have to step aside and stand for re-election if 25 per cent of shareholders voted against a remuneration package twice.

Mr Bowen says shareholders often vote against directors’ pay packets but they are effectively ignored because their votes are not always binding.

“And I think that will concentrate the minds of directors to ensure that they are taking into account the views of their shareholders when setting pay,” he said.

‘Heavy-handed’

But John Colvin from the Institute of Company Directors says the idea is not workable or needed because there are already board spill laws in place.

“We’re a bit perplexed and quite frankly bemused at why we would have such a heavy-handed, red-taped, legislative approach to this area,” he said.

“Whilst there are examples of, and we acknowledge those, of pay outcomes which haven’t been in line with either company expectations… on the whole Australian remuneration of corporate governance has been very good.”

The Government also wants to make corporate cowboys hand back their bonuses if they do not live up to their promises.

Mr Bowen says there is an anomaly in the law that does not penalise chief executives for making misleading statements.

“Where there’s a material misstatement in a company’s financial statements then that leads to a bonus, there’s no capacity for shareholders to get that bonus back if that is proven to be the case later on,” he said.

“That hasn’t been a big issue in Australia, I have to say in fairness. But it has been an issue some places elsewhere around the world and I think it’s prudent that we make sure the law is robust as possible.

“So I’m consulting about that. That wasn’t part of the Productivity Commission’s recommendations.

“I’m consulting about that and about the best method, but I do think there’s an anomaly there which needs to be fixed.”

Graham Bradley from the Business Council of Australia is curious about the claw-back concept and whether it is needed in Australia.

“There is no reason in principle why executives should be awarded if they’re responsible for material misstatements in company’s affairs, and many large companies already have rules to that effect,” he said.

“We’re not quite sure how the Government intends to legislate this particularly complex proposal that they’ve made and we’re looking forward to consulting with them on the details.”

‘Positive’ step

The Australian Shareholders Association (ASA) says it is surprised by the Government’s whole-hearted endorsement of the Productivity Commission’s report.

Association spokeswoman Claire Doherty says the response is much stronger than they had anticipated.

“We think that it’s a very well-measured, very well-considered report,” she said.

“I think that there are some who think that it hasn’t gone far enough and there are others on the other side who think that it’s gone way too far, which is probably a good indication that it’s quite measured.”

“So from the ASA’s point of view, it certainly went a little bit further than we had asked, but we’re very positive about the recommendations and we’re very hopeful that they’ll have the effect of making boards much more accountable on this issue which is very important to shareholders.”

But with an election looming, Mr Colvin has questioned the timing of the Government’s response.

“I think there might be something in that. I think it might backfire though, if you think that there are over two million directors in Australia and this type of legislation doesn’t apply just to listed companies,” he said.

“These types of legislation, like the termination payments, apply to not-for-profits, to charities, to school boards, to hospitals.

“And if you’re going to have all this type of regulation governing them as well, you’ve got to ask yourself why, what’s the mischief and why are we adding this sort of regulatory burden?”

Dassault Systèmes: Filing of the Annual Report 2009 – Document de référence

VÉLIZY-VILLACOUBLAY, France–(Business Wire)–
Regulatory News:

Dassault Systèmes (DS) (Paris:DSY) reported today the filing of the Annual
Report 2009 – Document de référence with the Autorités des Marchés Financiers
(AMF) on April 1, 2010.

This document is available on Dassault Systèmes` website at http://www.3ds.com
(heading Company/Finance/Overview). Hard copies of the Annual Report 2009 -
Document de référence are also available upon request at Dassault Systèmes`
headquarters, 10, rue Marcel Dassault, CS 40501 – 78946 Vélizy-Villacoublay,
France.

The following documents are included in the “Document de référence”:

* 2009 Annual Financial Report established in accordance with the provisions of
the French Monetary and Financial Code ;
* Annual Management Report from the Board of Directors to the General Meeting
established in accordance with the French Commercial Code ;
* Report of the Chairman on corporate governance and internal control procedures
;
* Information on independent public accountants` fees received by the Auditors
of Dassault Systèmes ;
* Annual Information Document (« Document d`information annuel ») ;
* Description of the share repurchase program proposed to the General Meeting.

About Dassault Systèmes

As a world leader in 3D and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) solutions,
Dassault Systèmes brings value to more than 115,000 customers in 80 countries. A
pioneer in the 3D software market since 1981, Dassault Systèmes develops and
markets PLM application software and services that support industrial processes
and provide a 3D vision of the entire lifecycle of products from conception to
maintenance to recycling. The Dassault Systèmes portfolio consists of CATIA for
designing the virtual product – SolidWorks for 3D mechanical design – DELMIA for
virtual production – SIMULIA for virtual testing – ENOVIA for global
collaborative lifecycle management, and 3DVIA for online 3D lifelike
experiences. Dassault Systèmes` shares are listed on Euronext Paris (#13065,
DSY.PA) and Dassault Systèmes` ADRs may be traded on the US Over-The-Counter
(OTC) market (DASTY). For more information, visit http://www.3ds.com.

CATIA, DELMIA, ENOVIA, SIMULIA, SolidWorks and 3D VIA are registered trademarks
of Dassault Systèmes or its subsidiaries in the US and/or other countries.

Dassault Systèmes:
François-José Bordonado/Béatrix Martinez
+33 1 6162 6924

Copyright Business Wire 2010

The Allco show comes to town

This week’s public examination into the collapse of Allco Finance Group reads like a who’s who of the corporate world and highlights the conundrums created when public companies are run like private firms.

Former Allco chairman and former Optus boss, Bob Mansfield, will take the stand, as will Allco founders, David Coe and Gordon Fell, and the Government’s infrastructure adviser, Sir Rod Eddington.

Up first in the Federal Court in Sydney was former chief executive David Clarke.

He wore a grey suit and patterned grey tie, and sipped water before the cross examination by John Sheahan SC began.

Mr Sheahan is working for the receivers, Ferrier Hodgson, who are being paid by the banking syndicate to find out why the company failed in November 2008, owing more than $1 billion.

Allco’s market value was almost wiped out in 2008 as share markets plummeted amid the global financial crisis.

That from a company which had a market value of $5 billion at its peak.

The cross examination revealed the complexities of Allco’s structure. More than 50 related companies are in liquidation following the collapse.

Mr Clarke admitted that the company was too complex and said that negative perceptions of highly structured finance houses like Allco and Macquarie Bank affected the share price, which fell by nearly half in late 2007.

Under heavy questioning, he conceded that a $50 million loan to a subsidiary, Allco Principals Trust, was partly made to stop margin calls from affecting the Allco share price.

“One of the purposes of the loan was to allow APT to meets obligations… one of set of obligations was the margin loans,” he told the inquiry.

The main shareholders in APT were senior Allco executives and its main asset was Allco shares.

The loan and other transactions with Allco companies are among issues being investigated by Ferrier Hodgson.

Another transaction being investgated is Allco’s decision to takeover property group Rubicon, which was controlled by Gordon Fell.

Mr Clarke conceded “we knew there was a poor response from shareholders,” but Allco went ahead regardless.

Mr Fell, Mr Coe and another top executive got paid $63 million and more than $130 million in shares.

Related party transactions were all the go at Allco, despite dissent from independent directors and big and small investors.

Mr Clarke said the company hoped to stop using such methods as the business model “matured”.

The admissions kept coming.

Mr Clarke said the sale of assets was sped up in 2007 so the company’s financial accounts would look better to the market and to head off another fall in the share price under a “failure is not an option” strategy.

That included $68 million in asset sales to the Singapore Investment Fund, a fund set up by Allco to expand its business.

Mr Clarke said “I felt there was a good reason to be optimistic.”

“We, of course, did not know we were about to enter the global financial crisis.”

The public examinations represent a rare insight into the inner workings of the company.

The former executives have rarely commented on the high profile collapse of a local victim of the global financial crisis.

Essentially, Allco borrowed too much to fund its expansion, which included assets like trains, planes and property.

And the collapse of Allco has already hit reputations.

Mr Clarke, a former Westpac executive, did not stand for re-election to the board of wealth manager AMP last year.

Sir Eddington decided not to take up the role of chairman of ANZ after the collapse.

He was criticised by shareholders for his seat on the Allco board at last year’s Rio Tinto annual general meeting. Sir Eddington is also a non-executive director of the big miner.

The banks are expected to get a substantial proportion of their cash back. Ferrier Hodgson has already managed to sell assets such as the leasing business and shipping business.

There’s little joy for ordinary investors though. They could wait years to see any of their money.

Investors are waiting on the sidelines to launch a class action if this inquiry reveals the company has available assets.

Also waiting on the sidelines is the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

They are probing whether Allco executives broke the law by doing deals in house.

As for Allco’s grand plans to takeover Qantas as part of a failed private equity bid, we are lucky that never happened.

The move was championed by Bob Mansfield, but it may have led to disaster for Qantas as the global financial meltdown hit.

Ariff asked to front Senate probe

Disgraced Newcastle administrator Stuart Ariff could be summonsed to appear before a Senate inquiry which will hold hearings in the city on April 14.

The inquiry began in Canberra last week, with the corporate regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, questioned about why it took five years to ban Ariff, after the first complaints were made about him.

Senator John Williams, who initiated the inquiry, says Ariff will be invited to appear before the committee in Newcastle to answer questions about his failed administrations.

“If he decides not to come along, then we do have the right to summons him to attend the committee,” he said.

“Mr Ariff has agreed to some 83 counts of wrongdoings and hence been scrubbed out for life, so we need to talk to him and ask him questions.”

MSCI Inc. to Acquire RiskMetrics Group, Inc.

Leaders in risk management solutions, portfolio management tools and equity
performance indices join forces to create a preeminent provider of investment
decision support tools
NEW YORK–(Business Wire)–
MSCI Inc. (NYSE: MXB), a leading global provider of investment decision support
tools, and RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (NYSE: RISK), a leading provider of risk
management and corporate governance products and services to the global
financial community, jointly announced today that they have entered into a
definitive merger agreement whereby MSCI will acquire RiskMetrics in a cash and
stock transaction valued at $21.75 per share based on MSCI`s closing price of
$29.98 per share on Friday, February 26, 2010, or approximately $1.55 billion.

The transaction will unite two market leaders and powerful brands including
MSCI, Barra, and RiskMetrics, to create a global, research-based, client-centric
organization, dedicated to delivering world class investment decision support
tools to financial institutions worldwide. The combined company would have
approximately $750 million of revenues and approximately 2,000 employees across
20 countries.

MSCI`s offer consists of $16.35 in cash and 0.1802 shares of MSCI per share of
RiskMetrics. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions,
including approval by the shareholders of RiskMetrics, the receipt by MSCI of
the proceeds of the debt financing for the transaction, antitrust clearance and
other customary regulatory approvals. The transaction is currently expected to
close in MSCI`s third fiscal quarter of 2010.

The transaction is expected to be financed by existing cash and proceeds of
debt. MSCI has received a commitment letter from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding,
Inc. for senior secured credit facilities aggregating up to $1.375 billion,
which would be available, subject to customary conditions, to fund the cash
consideration in the acquisition, the refinancing of existing senior secured
credit facilities of MSCI and RiskMetrics and the ongoing working capital needs
of MSCI and its subsidiaries following the transaction.

“This deal marks a significant milestone in our effort to become the leading
provider of investment decision support tools,” said Henry Fernandez, Chairman
and CEO, MSCI Inc. “The combined scale, complementary product capabilities and
clients and extensive geographic footprint of MSCI and RiskMetrics will drive
significant cost-saving synergies and revenue opportunities. RiskMetrics is the
perfect match for MSCI and we are very excited to welcome them to the MSCI
family.”

“One of the key trends that has been driving the growth of our analytics
business is the increased need to understand, measure, manage, and report risk.
The combination of MSCI`s expertise in portfolio equity risk models and
analytics, and RiskMetrics` powerful multi-asset class risk management platform
creates a comprehensive, best of breed portfolio risk management offering, which
will provide our clients with a seamless view of risk across the front and
middle office,” added Mr. Fernandez.

“This is a truly powerful combination. This transaction with MSCI will benefit
our investors, clients and employees,” said Ethan Berman, Chief Executive
Officer of RiskMetrics Group. “Managing risk is critically important in today`s
financial markets. Our clients will greatly benefit from the combined company`s
expanded product range and enhanced risk management offerings.”

The combined company will have an attractive growth profile with a diversified
revenue base, consisting predominantly of recurring revenues. The strong cash
flow and financial position of the combined company should also facilitate
further investment throughout the business in terms of products, people and
processes, reinforcing the company`s well-established position within and across
its clients` investment processes. In addition, the transaction is expected to
accelerate MSCI`s internal investment spending program, including the build-out
of MSCI`s portfolio management tools for fixed income managers and further
investment in financial indices, and creates the opportunity for an estimated
USD 50 million in cost synergies from duplicate areas such as platforms,
services and offices.

Approvals and Anticipated Closing

The Boards of Directors of both companies have approved the transaction. The
closing of the merger is expected to occur in MSCI`s third fiscal quarter of
2010, subject to certain customary conditions, including approval by
RiskMetrics` stockholders, the receipt by MSCI of the proceeds of the debt
financing for the transaction, and the receipt of antitrust clearance and other
customary regulatory approvals. In connection with the transaction, Ethan
Berman, the Chief Executive Officer of RiskMetrics Group, and certain other
RiskMetrics shareholders, have entered into a voting agreement with MSCI
pursuant to which they have agreed to vote, in the aggregate, approximately 54%
of the outstanding RiskMetrics shares in favor of this transaction.

Advisors

Morgan Stanley served as MSCI`s financial advisor, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
provided legal counsel to MSCI and UBS provided a fairness opinion to MSCI`s
Board of Directors. Morgan Stanley is also providing committed financing in
connection with the transaction. RiskMetrics` financial advisor was Evercore
Group, L.L.C., and it was advised on legal matters by Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP.

Conference Call Information

MSCI and RiskMetrics will host a webcast for investors at 9:00 am Eastern Time
on March 1, 2010. To hear the live event, visit the investor relations sections
of either of the two companies` websites, http://ir.msci.com and
http://investor.riskmetrics.com or dial 1-800-776-0420 within the United States.
International callers dial 1- 913-312-1393. Please visit http://ir.msci.com in
order to download the accompanying presentation document for the call.

An audio recording of the conference call will be available on MSCI`s and
RiskMetrics` websites approximately two hours after the conclusion of the live
event and will be accessible through March 8, 2010. To listen to the recording,
visit the investor relations sections of either of the two companies` websites,
http://ir.msci.com and http://investor.riskmetrics.com or dial 1-888-203-1112
(passcode: 2487893) within the United States. International callers dial
1-719-457-0820 (passcode: 2487893).

About RiskMetrics

RiskMetrics is a leading provider of risk management and corporate governance
products and services to the global financial community. By bringing
transparency, expertise and access to the financial markets, RiskMetrics helps
investors better understand and manage the risks inherent in their financial
portfolios. RiskMetrics solutions address a broad spectrum of risk across
clients’ financial assets. Headquartered in New York with 20 global offices,
RiskMetrics serves some of the most prestigious institutions and corporations
worldwide.

About MSCI

MSCI Inc. is a leading provider of investment decision support tools to
investment institutions worldwide. MSCI Inc. products include indices and
portfolio risk and performance analytics for use in managing equity, fixed
income and multi-asset class portfolios.

The company`s flagship products are the MSCI International Equity Indices, which
include over 120,000 indices calculated daily across more than 70 countries, and
the Barra risk models and portfolio analytics, which cover 58 equity and 49
fixed income markets. MSCI Inc. is headquartered in New York, with research and
commercial offices around the world. MXB#IR

Important Information for Investors and Shareholders

This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. MSCI
will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration
statement on Form S-4 that will include a proxy statement of RiskMetrics that
also constitutes a prospectus of MSCI. MSCI and RiskMetrics also plan to file
other documents with the SEC regarding the proposed transaction. A definitive
proxy statement/prospectus will be mailed to stockholders of RiskMetrics.
INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF MSCI AND RISKMETRICS ARE URGED TO READ THE
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC
CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL
CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATIONABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION.

Investors and stockholders will be able to obtain free copies of the proxy
statement/prospectus and other documents containing important information about
MSCI and RiskMetrics, once such documents are filed with the SEC, through the
website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents
filed with the SEC by MSCI will be available free of charge on MSCI`s internet
website at www.mscibarra.com or by contacting MSCI`s Investor Relations
Department at 866-447-7874. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by
RiskMetrics will be available free of charge on RiskMetrics` internet website at
www.riskmetrics.com or by contacting RiskMetrics` Investor Relations Department
at 212-354-4643

MSCI, RiskMetrics, their respective directors and certain of their executive
officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from
the stockholders of RiskMetrics in connection with the proposed transaction.
Information about the directors and executive officers of RiskMetrics is set
forth in its proxy statement for its 2009 annual meeting of stockholders, which
was filed with the SEC on April 29, 2009. Information about the directors and
executive officers of MSCI is set forth in its proxy statement for its 2010
annual meeting of stockholders, which was filed with the SEC on February 23,
2010. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and
a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or
otherwise, will be contained in the proxy statement/prospectus and other
relevant materials to be filed with the SEC when they become available.

Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to
future events or to future financial performance and involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause MSCI`s, RiskMetrics and
the combined company`s actual results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,”
“plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or
“continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in
some cases, beyond MSCI`s, RiskMetrics and the combined company`s control and
that could materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance, or
achievements. Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited
to: the risk that a condition to closing of the proposed merger may not be
satisfied; the risk that a regulatory approval that may be required for the
proposed merger is not obtained or is obtained subject to conditions that are
not anticipated; the failure to consummate or delay in consummating the proposed
merger for other reasons; the combined company`s ability to achieve the
synergies and value creation contemplated by the proposed merger; the combined
company`s ability to promptly and effectively integrate the businesses of
RiskMetrics and MSCI; and the diversion of management time on merger-related
issues.

Other factors that could materially affect MSCI`s, RiskMetrics and the combined
company`s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements can be
found in MSCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November
30, 2009 and filed with the SEC on January 29, 2010, in RiskMetrics` December
31, 2009 Annual Form 10-K which was filed with the SEC on February 24, 2010 and
in their respective quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form
8-K. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if MSCI`s or
RiskMetrics` underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may
vary significantly from what MSCI or RiskMetrics projected. Any forward-looking
statement in this release reflects MSCI`s or RiskMetrics` current views with
respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties
and assumptions relating to MSCI`s or RiskMetrics` operations, results of
operations, growth strategy and liquidity. MSCI and RiskMetrics assume no
obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any
reason, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available:

http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=6196785〈=en

For further information:
MSCI, New York
Edings Thibault, +1-212-804-5273
or
RiskMetrics, New York
Sarah Cohn, +1-212-354-4643
or
For media enquiries:
Abernathy MacGregor, New York
Steve Bruce, +1-212-371-5999
or
Penrose Financial, London
Sally Todd, +44 20 7786 4888

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Lover of collapsed MG Rover director paid 1.7-mn pounds for a year’s work

London, Sep 12 (ANI): MG Rover’s director paid his lover 1.7 million pounds for a year’s work, according to a report on the collapse of the car manufacturing giant.

In May 2000, the Phoenix consortium-John Towers, Nick Stephenson, Peter Beale and John Edwards-acquired the business for a nominal 10 pounds from BMW.

BMW ensured that MG Rover could survive for a few years. But from the outset, it was clear that it had no long-term future unless it could find a substantial business partner within the motor industry.

The report into the demise of the giant compiled by Gervase MacGregor, a partner at the accountants BDO Stoy Hayward, and the barrister Guy Newey QC condemns the consortium which made a fortune out of the collapsed car maker, The Independent reports.

They reported that the four directors supplied inaccurate and misleading information about Rover’s finances to MPs, and singled out evidence Beale gave to the Commons trade and industry select committee.

They expressed concern over the plainly excessive fee of almost 1.7 million pounds paid to Dr Qu Li for advice she gave the Phoenix management about potential business partners in China.

For some of the time Dr Li was paid by Rover, she and Stephenson were having an affair. The report protested about the poor “corporate governance” of the Phoenix team: some board members were not invited to several board meetings and inaccurate minutes were taken of discussions.

Despite the failure of MG Rover between 2000 and 2005, the Phoenix Four continued to pay themselves generously right up to the group’s demise in 2005.

Towers, who led the buyout, was paid 8.96 million pounds, Stephenson 8.98 million pounds and Edwards received 9.02 million pounds. Beale, who is accused of misleading the parliamentary inquiry into the company’s collapse, was paid 8.98 million pounds over the four years, while Howe pocketed 5.71 million pounds.

The report cleared ministers of blame for MG Rover’s demise. (ANI)

Satyam – Tech Mahindra renamed Satyam – Satyam -Mahindra group and inherent strength of Satyam brand – Satyam Computers is now Mahindra Satyam – scam-tainted Satyam Computer Services – scam-tainted

Satyam – Tech Mahindra renamed Satyam – Satyam -Mahindra group and inherent strength of Satyam brand – Satyam Computers is now Mahindra Satyam – scam-tainted Satyam Computer Services – scam-tainted

June 21 (IANS) Two months after taking over scam-tainted Satyam Computer Services, Tech Mahindra Sunday renamed the IT major as Mahindra Satyam. The logo will be adopted from the Mahindra Group. “This strategic move paves the way for the emergence of a robust brand, which draws from the core values of the Mahindra group and the inherent strength of the Satyam brand,” said a company statement here Sunday evening.

“Customer centricity, high standards of corporate governance, unimpeachable ethics form the cornerstones of the Mahindra Group,” said Mahindra Group vice chairman and managing director Anand Mahindra.

“This rebranding exercise symbolizes an amalgamation of the Mahindra Group’s values with Satyam’s fabled expertise, even as it retains that part of Satyam’s identity which signifies commitment, purpose and proficiency of the organization and its people,” the statement said.

Satyam’s executive vice chairman Vineet Nayyar described the move as “a significant milestone towards the recovery of the company”.

Tech Mahindra, owned by the $6.3 billion Mahindra Group, bought the scam-hit IT company in an open auction in April.

The re-branding comes six months after Satyam’s founder and then chairman B. Ramalinga Raju confessed to a Rs.78-billion accounting fraud.

The government launched a probe, superseded the board, and put the company up for sale in open auction.

Ramalinga Raju, his brother Rama Raju, former chief financial officer Vadlamani Srinivas and five other accused are currently in jail.

Prominent industry experts tackled changing role of CIOs at CIO Strategies India Forum

Bangalore, May 21 (ANI/Business Wire India): naseba, a leading business information firm specializing in organizing high profile conferences and events, announced the successful conclusion of the third annual ‘CIO Strategies India Forum’ that took place in Mumbai.

The two-day Forum brought together over 150 prominent CIOs from leading companies across India.

It focused on education, networking and exchange of ideas on redesigning IT structures in order to optimize costs and sustain the current economic challenges.

One of the attractive panel discussions held during the forum was ‘The changing role of CIOs’ moderated by Vilas Pujari, Joint Secretary of the CIO Klub.

It focused on the changes in the role and responsibilities of a CIO caused by the current economic climate. The panel featured Dhiren Savla, CIO, Kuoni India Travel; Manoranjan Sharma, Chief Economist and Deputy GM, Canara Bank; Lt. Col. H.S. Bedi, CMD, Tulip Telecom and V. Subramaniam, CIO, Otis Elevator who shared case practices from their professional experience. Furthermore, the event highlighted the latest trends and issues in the industry: corporate governance, business ethics, challenges in service-oriented architecture (SOA), development in a down economy, virtualization planning and implementation and enterprise cloud computing.

Suganthi Shivkumar, Managing Director – South Asia, Informatica, said: “The event was a forum of people focused on success! Combining like-minded senior IT professionals, who have been successful, want to be successful, and sharing their success with others. The event was an excellent platform. The diversity of topics presented and discussed, attendee retention, active participation in the workshops, all led to an insightful and successful event.”

A number of industry experts spoke at the forum including: Sriram Naganathan, Chief Technology and Operations Officer (CTOO), Reliance General Insurance; Upal Chakraborty, CIO, DLF India Ltd.; Andrew Knott, VP of Marketing, Asia Pacific, Salesforce; Ramkumar Ramamoorthy, Vice President Corporate Marketing, Research and Communications, Cognizant Technology Solutions; Lakshminarayana, Chief Strategy and M and A Officer of IT, Wipro Limited; Sandeep Phanasgaonkar, President and CTO, Reliance Capital Ltd. along with many others.

Concluding on the Forum, Mohammed Saleem, General Manager – India, naseba said: “We are proud to have hosted the third edition of CIO Strategies India forum this year. We strongly believe that such events are the ideal platform to discuss the latest trends and opportunities in the changing economic environment. We hereby take this opportunity to put forward our sincere gratitude to all our participants and speakers whose continued involvement and support made this forum a success.” (ANI)

Next stimulus package to revive the economy after elections

New Delhi, Mar 28 (ANI): Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia has acknowledged the need for another stimulus package for reviving the economy in next fiscal.

Talking to the reporters on the sidelines of a function in New Delhi today to mark the release of a report on Competition and Regulation in India, Ahluwalia revealed that this could be considered in the budget after the General Elections.

He further informed that the Planning Commission is conducting an exercise to measure the impact of the stimulus packages announced in the former years.

The report released on the occasion dealt with the various regulative ways to leverage economic growth. The report has emphasised the need of a regulatory system in various sectors including higher education, agriculture and railways.

The report has also brought to notice the super cession of regulators by the government in the power sector as well as dishonest practices of excessive subsidy and provision of employment, which has led to deprivation of electricity boards.

It has called for finer corporate governance in the sector. (ANI)

Steria India CSR efforts set new industry benchmarks

New Delhi, Feb 6 (ANI/Business Wire India): Steria India, a leading provider of IT-driven business services, has conferred the “Best Corporate Social Responsibility Practice” award by NASSCOM Foundation, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and Times Foundation under the aegis of the “Social and Corporate Governance Awards – 2008″.

The award validates Steria India’s overall focus on being a responsible corporate and giving back to the ‘Community’ which it recognizes as a very important stakeholder in its business.

Elaborating on Steria’s CSR focus, Gayathri Mohan, VP, CSR – India, Steria said, “We inherently believe that the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) should be an integral focus area for organizations who are looking at new and innovative ways to contribute to the communities they operate in, going beyond just helping immediate customers and shareholders. For us at Steria this sense of broader responsibility for communities we operate in is reflected in all our community engagement programs today and underlines our mission of enabling underprivileged communities to become self reliant and explore sustainable livelihood options.”

The main focus of Steria India CSR campaign is Education for children from marginalized communities in semi-urban and rural areas. The thrust is on providing primary and secondary school education coupled with computer literacy and career counselling.

Steria is also collaborating with the government, district administration and industry bodies across different locations for on-ground implementation of its CSR program.

Steria is also member of the one per cent club, wherein member companies contribute one per cent of their profits for socially relevant causes.

The company also encourages employees to do their bit for the community and under its “Matching Funds” scheme; Steria is committed to match monetary contribution from employees towards CSR initiatives. (ANI)

Court adjourns market regulator’s plea to quiz former Satyam chief

Hyederabad, Jan 31 (ANI): A judge of a trial court in Hyderabad has adjourned to February 9, the hearing of petition of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to grill Ramalinga Raju, the founder of Satyam Computer Services.

The court said it would not pass an order without hearing from Raju and his brother B Rama Raju.
“As far as permission to interrogate in concerned, I pressed for an interim order but the court said it would not like to pass such an order without hearing them. So he said that aspect will also be considered on February 9,” said Goolam E. Vahanvati, Solicitor General and also counsel for SEBI.

On January 7, B Ramalinga Raju confessed to fraudulent manipulation to the tune of rupees 7,136 crores over several years by inflating the company’s profits and assets.

Although the Satyam scandal, India’s biggest corporate fraud, has shattered global confidence in India’s corporate governance, the other IT companies have assured the rest of the world that all relevant services are professionally and ethically in order and as such there should be no room for any doubt about the professional integrity of Indian companies. (ANI)

Kamal Nath to address Partnership Summit 2009 today

New Delhi, Jan 19 (ANI): Commerce Minister Kamal Nath will chair the Partnership Summit 2009 and deliver a special address on “Building Partnerships in a Post-Crisis World” here today.

The inaugural plenary will also be addressed by Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit; Stockwell Day, Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific gateway, Canada; and Peter Mandelson, Secretary of State for Business, Enterprises and Regulatory Reform, UK.

The Summit comes at a crucial period in global economic history. With the financial turmoil impacting economies across the board, there is need for exploring and developing new economic ventures between nations.

Over the years, the Summit has become a respected platform for building partnerships between Indian and foreign participants from Governments, industry, civil society, and academia.

The Summit is a premium forum for international business networking and has immense potential for brand development and strategic marketing.

There will be several plenary sessions on “The Regulatory Landscape – Post Economic Crisis”; “Global Economic Crisis: Challenges for Corporate”; “Corporate Governance: Role and Responsibilities of Auditors” and “Corporate Governance Challenges: Lessons Learnt and Way Forward”. On January 20, various sessions will be held on “Post-Crisis Economic Order: Would Free Market Economics Change?” and “Strategies Security and Economic Inclusion: Is there a tradeoff?”. (ANI)