FEATURE-Syria grapples with surging population

DAMASCUS, June 3 (Reuters) – Ibrahim Issa, a jovial Syrian taxi-driver who wears a blue robe over an ample belly, has nine children from two wives. He plans to marry a third wife soon.

He says it is up to Allah whether more children arrive, and not for him to interfere, say, by using contraception. Like all Damascus taxi-drivers, he complains about the cost of living and how hard it is to make ends meet on the $300 a month he earns.

Issa, 43, shrugs when asked if all those mouths to feed don’t make life harder for him. “No, I’m delighted,” he grins.

Syria now has a population of 20 million people, with a growth rate that remains one of the world’s highest at about 2.4 percent. But it has declined since averaging 3.2 percent from 1947-94, according to the Syrian Commission for Family Affairs.

“We have a population problem, no question,” said Nabil Sukkar, a Syrian economist formerly with the World Bank. “Unless we cope with it, it could be a burden on our development.”

He said labour supply was growing about 4.5 percent a year, due to rapid population expansion in earlier decades, outpacing the capacity of Syria’s economy to create jobs for the quarter of a million youngsters arriving on the job market every year.

“Too big a population means a high burden on government services, such as education, electricity and health care,” he said. “Perhaps in 20 years the growth rate will go down to 1.5 percent as in Egypt, but in the meantime we do have a problem.”

The official unemployment rate is around 10 percent, but independent estimates put it at anywhere up to 25 percent.

DISPARATE FERTILITY RATES

Syrian women have an average of 3.6 children each, but this masks big disparities between cities and the countryside.

Despite the efforts of men like Issa the taxi-driver, fertility rates in Damascus and three other governorates are set to fall from 2 to 2.5 children per woman now to 1.4 to 2 by 2025, below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman.

In the seven least-developed of Syria’s 14 governorates, women have between 3.8 and 6.2 children. Their fertility rates are not expected to decline much in the next 15 years.

Demographers say urbanisation and the spread of education, especially among girls and women, are among the most potent forces that eventually curb population growth across the world.

Syria’s minority Christians, who tend to be well-educated citydwellers with high aspirations, provide a good example.

“My grandfather had eight children, my father had four and I have only two,” said Samer Lahham, who runs ecumenical affairs at the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in the Syrian capital.

“Now maybe after five years each family will have only one because of economic problems, education costs, living costs.”

Religion as such is irrelevant, said Lebanese demographer Riad Tabbarah. “Development brings education, which is a crucial factor because it increases the cost of raising children. Once education and modernisation set in, fertility falls.”

Syria, only now emerging from a socialist-style command economy, has modernised more slowly than nearby Lebanon, where fertility is already below the replacement rate and where the Lebanese have long yearned for lifestyles beyond their means.

“What affects fertility is also the difference between your income and your conventional standard,” Tabbarah said.

Contact with the outside world often gives people a taste for cars or other goods they can only afford by having fewer children, he said. “In Syria, that exposure came slowly and they still have a high fertility level, but it’s coming down.”

COMMUNICATION REVOLUTION

The aspirations of Syrians, like Arabs elsewhere, are now rising because of satellite TV, mobile phones and the Internet. “Young citizens are likely to have greater expectations than their parents, with readier access to regional and international media,” a Western diplomat said. “Even remote villages have satellite dishes. Many Syrians work abroad and return.”

Youngsters may be delaying marriage in places like Damascus, partly because they spend years in higher education and partly because they then cannot meet the traditional marriage costs.

A 32-year-old philosophy graduate said he was still single and lived with his parents because he could not afford the apartment that any bride would demand, even though he drives a taxi to supplement what he makes working at a government clinic.

“There are so many like me,” said the frustrated young man, refusing to be named. “It’s enough to drive people to crime.”

In rural areas, families are often large because it is relatively cheap to raise children until they are nine or 10 and can start working in the fields or earning money elsewhere.

Until modernisation prompts people who lack knowledge or access to contraceptives to desire fewer children, family planning advice is likely to fall on deaf ears. “Before that, nobody wants it. After that, nobody needs it,” Tabbarah said.

Giving girls a chance to go to school is a vital element in tackling Syria’s population challenges, said Etab Altaqee at the U.N. Population Fund, which works with the Syrian government.

Altaqee said some community-level efforts in the northeast had yielded small but encouraging results.

“In one of the poorest villages, the girls were saying we want to continue our education, but we need a bus because our fathers won’t allow us to go to school by ourselves,” she said. “It was as easy as that, just to provide them with transport.” (Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Foreigners use the pill more, sterilisation less

The pill is still the No 1 contraceptive for American women, but it’s even more popular in other countries, according to the first US government report comparing nations.

More US women, however, get their tubes tied than elsewhere, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention has reported.

In the US, 16 per cent of married women say they use the pill. That compares to 29 percent in the United Kingdom and more than 40 per cent in the Netherlands and France.

About one in four US married women opt for sterilisation, also known as tubal ligation, or tube-tying.

Sterilisation rates were below 10 per cent for most of the six countries included who collect those figures.

The patterns appear to be similar for all women, not just the married ones, said William Mosher, an author of the new report.

International comparisons are sometimes difficult because some nations only have information on married women, added Mosher, a statistician with the CDC’s National Centre for Health Statistics.

The US numbers are based on in-person interviews of more than 7,300 women of childbearing age nationwide from 2006 through 2008. The rates were compared to those of eight other industrialised countries – France, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Portugal, Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

The new report is the government’s first national data on contraception use in more than five years. It found that the pill was the most used contraceptive by all women, but sterilisation was a close second. About 17 per cent of women say they use the pill, and nearly the same proportion said they were sterilised.

The US has seen a variety of new contraception options for women in the last decade, including a vaginal ring and a skin patch. Though many women have tried them, fewer than 2 per cent said they used one of those methods.

Contraception choices by US women have remained remarkably stable for decades, Mosher said.

“We seem to be stuck in this pattern of the pill and sterilisation are the leading methods,” he said.

The pill was much more popular among women who have never had children – more than half of them use it. It was also more commonly used by white women and those who were more educated. More popular among older women is sterilisation.

Many Americans get their tubes tied after they have children, as a don’t-have-to-worry-about-it-anymore measure, experts say. Younger women with less education more often turn to sterilisation, as well.

Sex-ban on US troops not working, 15 female soldiers get pregnant in Afghanistan

London, May 16 (ANI): The American Army’s ban on sex hardly seems to be working with over fifteen pregnant women soldiers being sent home from Afghanistan.

The army had launched a vigourous campaign to counter rising incidents of pregnancy among women soldiers in Afghanistan, and measures like posters urging use of contraception have been put up in the medical centre and free condoms are being supplied in army camouflage tins.

But it has clearly met with little success.

“There have been so many pregnancies and the Army is starting to worry,” the Daily Express quoted a source, as saying.

Pregnant soldiers cause operational problems because they have to be replaced and seldom return within six months of giving birth, the paper reports. (ANI)

Ultrasound could be used as a male contraceptive

London, May 12 (ANI): University of North Carolina experts believe a blast of ultrasound to the testes can safely stop sperm production for six months.

The boffins, in fact, are beginning to conduct tests to see if ultrasound can be used as a reversible male contraceptive, reports The BBC.

Lead researcher Dr James Tsuruta said: “We think this could provide men with up to six months of reliable, low-cost, non-hormonal contraception from a single round of treatment.

“Our long-term goal is to use ultrasound from therapeutic instruments that are commonly found in sports medicine or physical therapy clinics as an inexpensive, long-term, reversible male contraceptive suitable for use in developing to first world countries.”

According to the boffins, once the testis has stopped producing sperm and all “sperm reserves” have been depleted, the man will be temporarily infertile. (ANI)

1 in 4 women have mixed feelings towards pregnancy

Washington, May 7 (ANI): A new study has suggested that contrary to the belief that women of childbearing age fall into two categories: those trying and not trying to have children, a third has shown that there are women who are fine either way.

Nearly a fourth of women consider themselves “OK either way” about getting pregnant, a wide swath of ambivalence that surprised researchers, and that could reshape how doctors approach many aspects of women”s health care.

In a study of nearly 4,000 women ages 25 to 45 who are sexually active, about 71 percent said they were not trying to get pregnant, while 6 percent said they were.

But nearly one in four, 23 percent, told researchers they were “OK either way”, they were neither trying to conceive, nor trying to prevent a pregnancy.

Among women who had no children, 60 percent said they were trying to not get pregnant, 14 percent were trying to get pregnant and 26 percent responded that they were fine any which way.

“This finding dramatically challenges the idea that women are always trying, one way or another, to either get pregnant or not get pregnant,” Julia McQuillan, professor of sociology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the study”s lead author, said.

“It also shows that women who are OK either way should be assessed separately from women who are intentional about pregnancy,” she stated.

The study also gave more accurate measures of women”s pregnancy intentions, which are important for estimating unmet need for contraception, building more effective family planning programs, promoting infant health and helping maternal and infant well-being.

“If health-care providers only ask women if they are currently trying to get pregnant and women say no, then the assumption is that they are trying not to get pregnant,” McQuillan said.

“Clearly, many women are less intentional about pregnancy. Yet this group should be treated as if they will likely conceive and should therefore get recommendations such as ensuring adequate folic acid intake and limiting alcohol intake,” she added.

Women who said they were OK either way reported the highest number when asked what the ideal number of children would be – 3.17 on average. They also tended to be slightly more religious than women who were either trying to get pregnant or not trying to get pregnant.

Seventy-three percent of women who said they were OK either way said they would like a baby, compared with 34 percent of women who were not trying to get pregnant, and 95 percent of women who said they were trying to get pregnant.

Those who were trying to get pregnant were more likely to report that having a child – or another child – was very important to their partner compared with women in the other two groups. Among women who had not yet had children and who said they were trying, 40 percent said it was important to their partner.

Half of all women in the survey said their career was very important to them, while 45 percent said the same about having an adequate amount of leisure time.

All three groups – women who were trying, women who weren”t trying, and women who were OK either way – reported similar attitudes about work and leisure. (ANI)

The Pill could put women off sex

Washington, May 4 (ANI): Researchers have found a link between using hormonal contraception and Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD), a condition most often caused by a lack of desire.

The study of female German medical students has been published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine.

Interestingly, women taking non-hormonal contraceptives were at lowest risk for FSD, more than women not using any contraceptive, the study said.

“Sexual problems can have a negative impact on both quality of life and emotional well-being, regardless of age,” said researcher Dr. Lisa-Maria Wallwiener of the University of Heidelberg, Germany. “FSD is a very common disorder, with an estimated prevalence of about two in five women having at least one sexual dysfunction, and the most common complaint appearing to be low desire.”

“The causes of FSD are multifunctional and in recent years the possible role of hormonal contraception has been discussed,” said fellow researchers Drs. Christian and Markus Wallwiener, University of Tuebingen, Germany. “Women tend to be aware that sexual dysfunction is often influenced by various factors such as stress and relationships, but our study has shown it might also be influenced by exogenous hormone application.”

1,086 women were included in the study, who completed questionnaires designed to identify problems with sexual function, as well as other lifestyle factors including desire for children, pregnancy and whether they were smokers. 87.4 percent had used contraceptives in the last 6 months, and 97.3 percent had been sexually active within the last four weeks.

To analyse the effect of contraception on sexual function, women using multiple forms of contraception or who had not been sexually active within the last four weeks were excluded, leaving 1046 participants. Of this figure, 32.4 percent were considered at risk for FSD: 5.8 percent at high risk for hypoactive sexual desire disorder, 1 percent for arousal disorder, 1.2 percent for decreased lubrication, 8.7 percent for orgasm disorder, 2.6 percent for satisfaction problems, and 1.1 percent for pain.

“In future research it would be interesting to see if there is a difference between the dosage of estrogen and the various synthetic progestins used in hormonal contraceptives in terms of an impact on female sexual function,” added study researcher Dr. Harald Seeger, also of University of Tuebingen, Germany. (ANI)

Advance emergency contraception doesn’t reduce pregnancy rates

Washington, Mar 17 (ANI): Women who take emergency contraception in advance of need do not reduce their chances of getting pregnant, despite increased and faster use of such medications after unprotected sexual intercourse, concludes a new study.

Women who take emergency contraception up to five days after unprotected sex are less likely to become pregnant.

However, there are chances that women may not be able to access emergency contraception within this time frame.

In some countries, for instance, emergency contraceptives are not available over the counter and it can be difficult to arrange an appointment with a doctor on public holidays or weekends.

One solution could be that the women should keep a set of emergency contraceptive pills for immediate use, should it be needed.

The review included 11 trials and involved a total of 7,695 women from the US, China, India and Sweden.

The researchers studied the effect of advance provision of emergency contraception on rates of pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), as well as on sexual behaviour and contraceptive use.

They found that women with advance access to emergency contraception had similar rates of pregnancy as women who did not receive the medication in advance.

Women given emergency contraception in advance were no more likely to have unprotected sex, to contract STIs, or to change their use of other contraceptive methods.

But, women with advance provision did take the medication an average of 13 hours sooner after sex, and were more likely to use emergency contraception at all.

“Our review suggests that strategies for advance provision of emergency contraception which have been tested to date do not appear to reduce unintended pregnancy at the population level. At the same time, advance provision does not appear to increase the risk of unprotected sex or sexually transmitted infections, and does not change use of other contraceptive methods,” said lead researcher Chelsea Polis of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

“Some women may not use emergency contraception when needed, even if they have it in advance. Like condoms, emergency contraception will not work if it is not used. Women should still be given information about and easy access to emergency contraception, because it is a safe and effective way to prevent unintended pregnancies for individual women who will use it when needed,” added Polis.

The findings have been published in The Cochrane Library. (ANI)

Women on pill may live longer

Australian experts are divided over fresh British research which says the oral contraceptive pill is good for women.

The study published in the British Medical Journal says women who have taken the pill are less likely to die from any cause, including all cancers and heart disease, compared with those who have never used it.

The UK researchers followed 46,000 women for nearly 40 years, in what is now one of the world’s largest contraceptive pill studies.

Some Australian academics back the findings but others warn the study is flawed and fails to consider the pill’s effect on mental health.

Professor Jayashri Kulkarni from the Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre in Melbourne says she is concerned about the size of the study and the conclusions drawn from it.

“There are all sorts of anomalies that worry me,” she said.

“Big epidemiological studies that have many flaws such as this one are not predictive in side effects and other effects of medication.

“It will create a lot of interest and excitement but won’t be helpful for individual women as it is not designed for that.

“The study results could give the false impression that the pill somehow decreases cancer when in fact the finding may be due to the loss of follow up of women who actually died from clotting problems on the pill.”

Professor Kulkarni says while the study addresses the pill’s physical impact it is also important to look at how the pill influences women’s general wellbeing.

She has spent years researching the link between oral contraceptives and depression in Australian women.

“We have been very concerned about the impact of the progesterone component of the pills that are most commonly used, in that progesterone seems to have a depressive effect and many women describe an insidious, slow onset of depression,” she said.

“That’s not something that’s significantly looked at in research studies.

“The studies focus on physical wellbeing, but in fact it’s the mental wellbeing that really is the biggest contributor to women deciding to go off the pill or change pills.”

The UK study did find a higher rate of violent death, such as suicide, among pill users.

Protects against cancer

But Professor John Hopper from the University of Melbourne’s School of Population Health believes the pill can be beneficial for women and says he has found it can protect against cancer.

In a recent study he found that women with mutations in genes BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 – which places them at a higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer – may in fact be protected by the pill.

“We’d been conducting studies of women with mutations in those genes to find out what might increase or decrease risk for those women,” he said.

“We had the hypothesis that use of oral contraceptions would actually be bad for these women.

“To our surprise, we found that for women who had a mutation in BRCA 1, the data was telling us that if they used oral contraception they may be protected from ovarian cancer.

“So for women with a certain high risk of breast cancer, the pill might actually be protective against breast cancer and ovarian cancer.”

Professor Hopper admits there is research which shows increased risks for women who take the pill, but says oral contraception has come a long way since it was introduced in the early 1960s.

“Although there might be reports of it having side affects… now, in the longer term, you have bigger studies and you may be getting a better answer than what you were at the time when it [the pill] first came out,” he said.

“There were problems with the pill, they seem to have been addressed. We’ve got to keep on monitoring these things, but it may be surprisingly protective for some women and this could be an important finding.”

Professor Kulkarni says there need to be more well-designed trials of different pills so that women and their doctors can determine the best oral contraceptive for them.

“The pill is a significant, empowering development for women and the next important step forward is the further development of an effective contraception with optimal physical and mental health safety,” she said.

While the British study did find a slightly higher risk in women under 45 years of age who are current or recent users of the pill, the researchers found that the effects in younger women disappear after about 10 years and the benefits in older women outweigh the smaller excess risks among younger women.

Roxon ‘uncomfortable’ over parents picking children’s sex

The Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon says she would be very uncomfortable about allowing parents to choose their children’s sex.

The Health and Medical Research Council is reviewing whether to allow any parents who use IVF to select their baby’s gender.

The practice is currently only allowed when there is a risk that parents will pass on genetic diseases.

The Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon says the Government has no plans to overturn the ban.

“I must say on a personal level I am very apprehensive about such a change,” she said.

“I’m happy to see any review of the science and the arguments that people might want to make for and against the case.

“But I need to flag that the governments had not set down the path because we want to make any changes, and at a personal level I’m very uncomfortable about the suggestions that a change might be made.”

Leading IVF specialist Professor Gab Kovacs says that is ridiculous and not allowing parents to choose the sex of their child could have negative results.

“If a couple are determined enough to go through IVF rather than natural pregnancy to have a child of one particular sex, then it’s possible that if they have a child of the opposite sex, that child may not be as appreciated and well looked after,” he said.

Professor Kovacs says parents can already travel to countries like the US and Thailand to choose their child’s gender.

He says if parents are willing to pay up to $15,000 for the technique, then they should be allowed.

“There are a small number of couples who are so determined they want a child of a particular sex, they’re prepared to go for the cost and the difficulty of IVF to get pregnant, rather than just do it naturally,” he said.

“I can’t see any reason why it should be forbidden. I’ve seen a number of couples who have maybe three or four children of one particular sex and they’re very keen on family balancing. That’s the type of couple that most often ask about sex selection.”

Dr Sandra Hacker, chair of the council’s Australian Health Ethics Committee, says the review will consider all sides of the controversial and emotive issue.

She says previous consultations have found the majority of Australians are opposed to the practice being widely available.

“There is considerable interest from the general public about this,” she said.

“But on the other hand, the idea that gender selection should be available for reasons other than genetic abnormalities seems to be one that has a general disaffection within the general population.”

Gene linked to male infertility identified

Washington, Sept 16 (ANI): Scientists from Virginia Commonwealth University have identified a gene that may contribute to male infertility.

The research team hopes that the new findings would lead to new approaches to male contraception.

Sperm are produced in the testicles through a three-step process called spermatogenesis.

During the final stage, known as spermiogenesis, a lot of changes take place, including the packaging of DNA into the sperm head and the formation of the sperm tail, which propels the sperm cell toward the egg.

The study conducted using mouse model showed that mice lacking a protein called meiosis expressed gene 1, or MEIG1, were sterile as a result of impaired spermiogenesis – the process that encompasses changes in the sperm head and the formation of the tail.

The team also found that MEIG1 associates with the Parkin co-regulated gene protein, or PACRG protein, and that testicular PACRG protein is reduced in MEIG1-deficient mice.

PACRG is thought to play a key role in assembly of the sperm tail, and the reproductive phenotype of PACRG -deficient mice mirrors that of the MEIG1-mutant mice.

“We discovered that MEIG1 is essential for male fertility. Moreover, our findings reveal a critical role for the MEIG1/PACRG partnership in the function of a structure that is unique to sperm, the manchette. The absence of a normal manchette in mice lacking MEIG1 totally disrupts the maturation process of sperm,” said Dr Jerome F. Strauss III, dean in the VCU School of Medicine.

“In addition to having an impact on fertility, the discovery identifies a new target for drug discovery for a much needed reversible male method of contraception,” he added.

The study is published in the Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (ANI)

‘Pullout method’ nearly as effective as using condoms: Study

Washington, May 29 (ANI): A new study has indicated that the old “pullout method”, pulling out just before ejaculation, works nearly as well as condoms in preventing pregnancies.

The study, titled “Better than nothing or savvy risk reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal,” appears in the June edition of the journal Contraception, reports CBS News. he authors find:

“If the male partner withdraws before ejaculation every time a couple has vaginal intercourse, about 4 percent of couples will become pregnant over the course of a year. However, more realistic estimates of typical use indicate that about 18 percent of couples will become pregnant in a year using withdrawal.

“These rates are only slightly less effective than male condoms, which have perfect- and typical-use failure rates of 2 percent and 17 percent, respectively.” (ANI)

A woman’s partner status influences her interest in the opposite sex

Washington, May 29 (ANI): A woman’s interest in the opposite sex does get influenced by her partner status, according to a study.

Indiana University neuroscientist Heather Rupp asked 59 men and 56 women rated 510 photos of opposite-sex faces for realism, masculinity/femininity, attractiveness, or affect.

The participants were instructed to give their “gut” reaction and to rate the pictures as quickly as possible.

The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and were not using hormonal contraception.

Twenty-one of the women reported that they had a current sexual partner, compared to 25 of the men.

Rupp observed that women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness.

However, the researchers revealed, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos.

Rupp further revealed that the study did not find any difference between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

“That there were no detectable effects of sexual partner status on women’s subjective ratings of male faces, but there were on response times, which emphasizes the subtlety of this effect and introduces the possibility that sexual partner status impacts women’s cognitive processing of novel male faces but not necessarily their conscious subjective appraisal,” the authors wrote in a research article.

They also noted that influence of partner status in women could reflect that women, on average, are relatively committed in their romantic relationships, “which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners.”

Rupp, assistant scientist at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, added: “These findings may reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies that may act early in the cognitive processing of potential partners and contribute to sex differences in sexual attraction and behaviour.”

The study has been published in the journal Human Nature. (ANI)

Carla Bruni takes a pop at Pope Benedict XVI over Aids comment

London, May 19 (ANI): French First Lady Carla Bruni has launched a scathing attack on Pope Benedict XVI accusing him of ‘damaging’ Africa with his approach to contraception.

The 41-year-old singer and supermodel said that the Church’s teachings had left her feeling “profoundly secular”.

Bruni said she was so upset by Benedict XVI’s views that she was no longer a practising Roman Catholic, reports The Telegraph.

Her outburst risked angering believers in France, who said she had ‘shamed’ her husband, Nicolas Sarkozy’s, presidency.

In March, while on an Africa tour the Pope sparked controversy by saying that the Aids pandemic which has crippled the continent “can’t be resolved with the distribution of condoms; on the contrary, there is the risk of increasing the problem”.

While commenting on the subject, Bruni-Sarkozy said: “I was born Catholic, I was baptised, but in my life I feel profoundly secular.

“I find that the controversy coming from the Pope’s message – albeit distorted by the media – is very damaging.

“In Africa it’s often Church people who look after sick people. It’s astonishing to see the difference between the theory and the reality.”

“I think the Church should evolve on this issue. It presents the condom as a contraceptive which, incidentally, it forbids, although it is the only existing protection,” she told Femme Actuelle, the women’s magazine. (ANI)

Now, a home kit for men to monitor reproductive status post vasectomy

Washington, May 14 (ANI): Men, who don’t know when to stop using contraceptive methods after vasectomy, can now resort to a medical home test kit based on a protein discovered at the University of Virginia Health System, called SpermCheck Vasectomy.

The new product line could revolutionize the way men around the world monitor their reproductive status.

“The SpermCheck family of products is intended for use by men on both sides of the fertility equation – those who don’t want to father children and those who do,” said Dr. John C. Herr, inventor of SpermCheck technology who is professor of cell biology.

SpermCheck Vasectomy is based on antibodies that bind to SP-10, a protein discovered in Herr’s laboratory, and is the only FDA approved immunodiagnostic test for monitoring sperm after vasectomy.

The device looks and functions much like a home pregnancy test.

It measures SP-10, which is present at constant levels in each sperm head, and enables men to quickly and accurately monitor their post-vasectomy sterility.

Such monitoring is important because sperm can remain in the male reproductive tract for weeks or months after a vasectomy.

Thus, to avoid unexpected pregnancies, vasectomized men must practice birth control until their sperm count falls below fertility levels.

According to Herr, at-home privacy, convenience and affordability of SpermCheck Vasectomy will boost post-operative monitoring and make it easy for couples to accurately determine when contraception methods are no longer needed. (ANI)

Bristol Palin now says abstinence is a ‘realistic’ option for teens

Washington, May 7 (ANI): Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s daughter Bristol, an 18-year-old unwed mother, says that abstinence is a ‘realistic’ option for teenagers.

Bristol, who is a Teen Ambassador to The Candie’s Foundation, did a turnabout on May 6 with her views on teen sex, and told ABC’s “Good Morning America” that she wished she had waited to have sex.

She also said that abstinence was a realistic way for teens to avoid unwanted pregnancy.

“Regardless of what I did personally, I just think that abstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100 percent foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy,” Fox News quoted her as saying.

The teenage mom had in a February 16 interview said that while teens should wait to have sex, advocating abstinence was unrealistic.

“I think abstinence is … I don’t know how to put it … everyone should be abstinent or whatever, but it’s not realistic at all,” she had said at the time.

Levi Johnston, Palin’s former fiance and the father of her baby Tripp, echoed that earlier view, saying that abstinence was “not realistic” for young people.

He said that sexually active teens needed to learn about contraception as well.

“Abstinence is a great idea,” Johnston told “CBS This Morning” in an interview.

“But I also think you need to enforce, you know, condoms and birth control and other things like that to have safe sex. I don’t just think telling young kids, ‘You can’t have sex,’ it’s not going to work,” he added.(ANI)

Oz Catholic Church head says AIDS-afflicted countries ‘awash with condoms’

Sydney, Apr.10 (ANI): The head of Australia’s Catholic Church, Cardinal George Pell said today that most AIDS-afflicted countries were ‘awash with condoms’.

Cardinal Pell said he agreed with Pope Benedict XVI that condoms were aggravating the African AIDS epidemic by encouraging promiscuity.

“The idea that you can solve a great spiritual and health crisis like AIDS with a few mechanical contraptions like condoms is ridiculous,” Cardinal Pell said.

Mr Phillip Jensen, Anglican Dean of Sydney, said he sympathised with Cardinal Pell’s views on promiscuity, but did not believe condoms alone had made society more promiscuous.

“In terms of adultery, in terms of divorce, in terms of grandchildren, yes we are in big trouble as a society because of the sexual revolution,” Fox News quoted him, as saying.

“It came out of Virginia Woolf and that crowd (in England in the early 20th century). It’s a century-long movement that has happened. In my view, it’s a disaster. It has ruined lives. It is ruining our society,” Jensen added.

Jensen said he could not comment specifically about AIDS in Africa, and said that the Anglican Church was not opposed to contraception.

Cardinal Pell said a non-Catholic health worker in Africa had told him condoms were not an effective solution to Africa’s AIDS problem. (ANI)

12yr-old school kids engaging in risky sexual activity

Washington, Apr 9 (ANI): A new study by researchers at The University of Texas School of Public Health has shown that school kids as young as 12 are engaging in risky sexual activity.

A team led by Dr. Christine Markham, assistant professor of behavioural science at the UT School of Public Health, examined sexual risk behaviours among middle school students in a large southeastern U.S. urban public school district.

“This is one of the few school-based studies conducted with this age group to look at specific sexual practices in order to develop more effective prevention programs,” Markham said.

“This study shows that although most seventh graders are not engaging in sexual risk behaviours, a small percentage are putting themselves at risk,” she stated.

Markham and colleagues define sexual intercourse as vaginal, oral or anal sex.

And as per their research, by age 12, 12 percent of students had already engaged in vaginal sex, 7.9 percent in oral sex, 6.5 percent in anal sex, and 4 percent in all three types of intercourse.

“These findings are alarming because youth who start having sex before age 14 are much more likely to have multiple lifetime sexual partners, use alcohol or drugs before sex and have unprotected sex, all of which puts them at greater risk for getting a sexually transmitted disease (STD) or becoming pregnant,” Markham said.

The study found one-third of sexually active students reported engaging in vaginal or anal sex without a condom within the past three months, and one-fourth had four or more partners.

The more experienced students in all three types of intercourse were more likely to be male and African-American.

“We need to develop prevention programs that address the needs of students who are not yet sexually active in order to promote skills and attitudes to help them wait until they are older to have sex,” Markham said.

“And we need to provide skills and knowledge related to condoms and contraception for youth who are already sexually active.”

The study recommends that sexually active students also need to receive accurate and factual information and services related to STDs and pregnancy testing, as well as skills for future abstention and risk reduction for those who intend to remain sexually active.

More than one-third of youth in the study reported engaging in precoital touching behaviours. Among the students who engaged in precoital behaviour, 43 percent reported having engaged in sexual intercourse.

“We need more research to develop effective interventions, in particular for youth of color living in underserved areas,” Markham said.

“A common misperception among adolescents is that oral or anal intercourse is not as risky for STD transmission.

“But transmission of non-viral and viral STDs can occur through all three types of intercourse when condoms are not used.

“It is critical that health education teachers and school nurses feel comfortable addressing these issues with their students and that their efforts are supported by parents and the school administration,” she added.

The study has been published in the Journal of School Health. (ANI)

Oral contraceptives ‘increase lupus risk’

Washington, April 8 (ANI): Use of oral contraceptives is associated with an increased risk of autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus, a new study has shown.

The study found that the risk was mostly limited to current users, those who had just started using contraception, and those using older first- and second-generation oral contraceptives instead of third-generation ones.

Led by Dr. Samy Suissa of the Centre for Clinical Epidemiology at Jewish General Hospital of McGill University in Montreal, researchers obtained data on more than 1.7 million women ages 18-45 from the U.K. General Practice Research Database, which contains more than 6 million people.

The women all had prescriptions for combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing estrogen and progestogen.

During an average of eight years of follow-up, 786 women had a first-time diagnosis of SLE. Each case was matched with up to 10 controls among women without SLE at the time of the case’s diagnosis.

The results showed that the use of COCs was associated with a significant increased risk of newly diagnosed SLE.

This was mostly limited to the first three months of use with first- and second-generation contraceptives containing higher doses of estrogen, suggesting “an acute effect in susceptible women and possibly a dose-response effect of estrogen on SLE onset,” according to the researchers.

They note that estrogen can directly modulate the immune response, which could complete the action of some sex-linked genes and contribute to the genetic predisposition of the disease, and it has also been shown to have an effect on the breakdown of immune tolerance seen in SLE.

“Our findings that longer-term use of contraceptives is associated with an increased risk of incident SLE (albeit of lower magnitude) and that current use of contraceptives with higher doses of ethinyl estradiol is associated with an increased risk of incident SLE, suggest a possible dose-response effect of estrogen on SLE onset, which could be an alternative or additional mechanism to favor occurrence of the disease,” the authors said.

They note that the absence of significant increased risk in third-generation contraceptives may be related to the lower doses of estrogen compared to earlier generations.

The study was published in the April issue of Arthritis Care and Research. (ANI)

Gene discovery may pave way for male contraceptive

Washington, April 3 (ANI): Scientists are concentrating on a newly discovered genetic abnormality, which appears to prevent some men from conceiving children, in order to develop a male contraceptive.

While female oral contraceptives have been available for about 40 years, the only contraceptives available for men are condoms or a vasectomy.

“We have identified CATSPER1 as a gene that is involved in non-syndromic male infertility in humans, a finding which could lead to future infertility therapies that replace the gene or the protein. But, perhaps even more importantly, this finding could have implications for male contraception,” said Dr. Michael Hildebrand, co-lead author of the study and a University of Iowa (UI) postdoctoral researcher in otolaryngology at the UI Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine.

The male infertility gene was discovered during a study on the genetics of families from Iran – a population that has relatively high rates of disease-causing gene mutations.

Studies on mice lacking the CATSPER1 gene have shown that mutations in it affect sperm motility, specifically the very vigorous hyperactive motion the sperm uses when it is entering the egg during fertilization.

“Our research suggests that the defect in sperm hyperactivity that is seen in mice without CATSPER1 will also occur in humans with the genetic mutation,” Hildebrand said.

“Identification of targets such as the CATSPER1 gene that are involved in the fertility process and are specific for sperm — potentially minimizing side effects of a drug targeting the protein’s function — provide new targets for a pharmacological male contraceptive,” he added.

While many ideas regarding male contraception are being investigated, the researchers say that one approach that may potentially target CATSPER1 is immunocontraception, where antibodies are developed that bind to a targeted protein and block its function.

They, however, noted that immunocontraception is still in early stages of development, and that in order to be useful, it will need to be proven effective, safe and reversible.

The study has been reported online in the American Journal of Human Genetics. (ANI)

Middle-aged Brits are ignoring sex disease risks

London, April 2 (ANI): Health experts are worried that middle-aged people are continuing to ignore sex disease risks.

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain has revealed that about one-fifth of the 2,258 adults polled, aged 45 to 54, confessed to having had unprotected sex with someone other than a long-term partner in the past five years.

The society’s said that people were found to have a misconception that their risk of catching a sexually transmitted infection (STI) was “next to nothing”.

The experts observed that older people were more likely to be single or undergoing relationship changes, and less likely to consistently use condoms, perhaps because the risk of pregnancy no longer exists.

The RPSGB’s survey revealed that older generations were flippant about the risks of catching an STI.

One-fourth of the people surveyed said that they did not use contraception because they trusted the person they were sleeping with not to have an STI.

About 10 per cent said that they did not like the feeling of condoms.

The surveyors further revealed that about a third of the subjects described their risk of getting an STI via unprotected sex with a new partner or someone other than their current partner as unlikely or very unlikely.

A further 20 per cent thought that their chances of picking up an infection were “next to nothing”.

About 25 per cent of those over 55 believed that their chances of acquiring an STI from unprotected sex were next to nothing, compared to 13 per cent of those aged 18-24.

“The majority of safe sex messages are targeted at teenagers, but as more adults begin new relationships later in life, they quite clearly need advice too,” the BBC quoted RPSGB spokeswoman Heidi Wright as saying.

“You can’t always tell who has an STI and infections don’t discriminate on the basis of age,” Wright added.

Lisa Power of the Terrence Higgins Trust said: “Teenagers aren’t the only people who think they’re immune from harm. Whatever your age, if you have a new sexual partner or more than one, condoms should be a basic part of ensuring your sexual health and theirs. It’s more embarrassing to get an infection than to use a condom.”

A Department of Health spokesperson said: “The message is the same for everyone – anyone having unprotected sex potentially puts themselves at risk of an STI. Infections rates have risen in all age groups, including older people.

The spokesperson added: “Older people also need to be aware of the need to use condoms consistently, particularly those who are newly single and entering relationships with new partners.” (ANI)