Q+A: Sudan’s north-south referendum negotiations

(Reuters) – Northern and southern Sudanese leaders began negotiations on Saturday on issues including how to share oil revenues after a January 2011 referendum on southern independence.

Here are some questions and answers on the talks, which are expected to last six months.

WHAT IS AT STAKE?

The referendum was promised in a 2005 peace deal that ended Africa’s longest civil war — a decades-long conflict between north and south Sudan in which an estimated 2 million people were killed and 4 million forced to flee their homes.

The accord gave southerners the right to decide whether to stay in Sudan or declare independence.

Analysts have warned there is a risk of a return to war unless the two sides resolve many contentious issues before the vote.

A southern vote for secession and the creation of a new country could fuel separatist dreams in other African states.

WHAT ARE THE NEGOTIATIONS ABOUT?

The two sides will produce plans for two scenarios — a vote for unity and a vote for separation.

If, as many analysts expect, separation is the outcome, the negotiators will have to package it in a way that is acceptable to both parties. If either side feels like losers, the opportunities for conflict will increase.

WHAT ARE THE MAIN TOPICS?

North Sudan’s dominant National Congress Party (NCP) and the south’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) have agreed to cover four main areas:

FINANCIAL, ECONOMIC AND NATURAL RESOURCES

The most intense negotiations will focus on the division of Sudan’s natural assets and massive debts.

Most of Sudan’s oil — about 78 percent according to the Economist Intelligence Unit — is produced in the south, which would have to share the oil revenue with the north after a split. At present, the only way for the south to get its oil to market is through northern pipelines to Port Sudan on the Red Sea.

Persistent distrust between the civil war foes means they will have to find a clear way of reporting those revenues so that neither feels short-changed, campaign group Global Witness said in a report this week.

The south will also have to negotiate its share of the White Nile water that flows through its territory at a time of growing tension between Nile-side countries over water supplies.

NATIONALITY

There are up to 2 million southerners living in north Sudan as refugees or long-term migrants, and a smaller number of northerners living in the south. The campaign group Refugees International says many of these will be left stateless and vulnerable if the country splits. The talks will cover their nationality as well as property and investment rights. Negotiators will also tackle the nationality of nomadic groups who move their livestock over the border.

SECURITY

Talks will focus on the status of thousands of northern and southern soldiers serving together in the Joint Integrated Units set up under the 2005 accord, many of them in contentious border areas. Northern and southern leaders are at loggerheads over the position of their shared border. Given the lack of progress over the past five years, southerners may have to vote for independence without a clear idea of where their new territory starts and ends. The two sides will have to agree on ways of resolving conflicts and policing the border.

INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND LEGAL ISSUES

The two sides will list the international organizations and treaties that Sudan has joined over the years and work out how far they would cover an independent south.

(Reporting by Andrew Heavens, editing by Tim Pearce)

G20 still has to prove itself after promising start

June 2 (Reuters) – If the Group of 20 were a wine, a connoisseur would say that it has great potential but that a lot depends on how it matures over the years.

The old root stock of the Group of Seven industrial nations has been freshened up with fast-growing emerging economies including China, India and Brazil. The likes of Indonesia and Argentina add spice to the assemblage.

Now comes the hard part: making a finished product that is well-balanced and harmonious.

“It’s not going to be about the G7 any more. That’s very clear. It’s just that the G20 is not yet a well-functioning team,” Alicia Garcia-Herrero, Hong Kong-based chief economist for emerging markets at Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

TAKE A LOOK on the G20 meeting [ID:nSGE64R00R]

G20 ministers face wrangling over bank tax [ID:nLDE64O0MP]

Q+A - G20 efforts to agree a bank tax [ID:nLDE64Q135]

FACTBOX-What the G20 will discuss in Busan [ID:nLDE64Q1LB]

FACTBOX-G20 progress on financial regulation[ID:nLDE64N0NC]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

For sure, near-term expectations are low.

A meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank chiefs in this port city on Friday and Saturday is unlikely to make much headway on the contentious issues of international financial regulation and a global bank tax to pay for any future bailouts.

Ministers are expected to fudge the tax issue by drawing up a “list of principles” for the group’s leaders to consider at a summit in Toronto on June 26/27, according to a G20 source.

Papering over differences would reinforce criticism voiced by officials — from both rich and emerging countries — that the G20 is more of a talking shop than an executive committee to steer the world economy.

“There is still a transition, in that having many more players at the table in a relatively disorganised way makes it hard to take decisions,” Garcia-Herrero said.

LEGITIMACY

Although world leaders last September elevated the G20 to be the premier international economic policy forum, it was telling that it was G7 finance ministers who held a conference call last month to discuss Greek and euro zone debt woes — an issue set to feature prominently in Busan. [ID:nN14134540]

Consensus over a bank tax would have eluded even the tighter membership of the G7, given Canada’s fierce opposition.

Still, the bickering is taking some of the shine off the G20′s impressive response to the 2008/09 financial meltdown. The group’s governments pledged $5 trillion in stimulus spending and loan guarantees in a display of urgency that some fear is fading.

“As the economy has started to recover, we observe a very diluted imperative for global cooperation and standard setting, in favour of more technical and nationalistic proposals,” Li Daokui, an economics professor at Beijing’s Tsinghua University, and Suzanne Nora Johnson, a trustee of the Carnegie Institution for Science in the United States, wrote in a paper for the World Economic Forum issued last week.

Yet markets ignore the G20 at their peril.

Accounting for 85 percent of global GDP, the group unquestionably enjoys greater political legitimacy than the G7.

And not least because China is a member, it is the G20 that holds the key to ironing out global economic imbalances.

“Increasingly the G20 is a big focus,” said Michael Buchanan, chief Asian economist for Goldman Sachs. “Given China’s preference for multilateral institutions, the G20 seems a much more appropriate forum for China to make its voice heard.”

Buchanan agreed that it would be better to have a smaller group — with the United States, China and a single euro zone representative at its core — to thrash out currency policy.

“But if you want to have a discussion about the risk to global growth and you don’t include China with a proper seat at the table, that’s not too sensible,” he said.

To improve the workings of the G20, governments are debating the merits of a permanent secretariat to ease the burden on the rotating presidency, a Chinese official said.

Garcia-Herrero with BBVA said that in addition to a stronger secretariat, the G20 could call on regional and international institutions to work on various issues.

“It would become more multilateral than it was at the G7 because there are more people involved. But that doesn’t mean it won’t work,” she said. (Additional reporting by Brian Love in Paris; Editing by Ken Wills and Neil Fullick)

Nepal parties fail to forge consensus on CA term extension

Kathmandu, May 26 — Nepal seems headed for a crisis with the much-expected meeting of the three main political parties failing to forge a consensus on extending tenure of the Constituent Assembly on Friday evening. The meeting between the ruling Nepali Congress and CPN (UML) and the opposition Maoists failed as both factions stuck to their previous demands.

They have agreed, however, to meet again on Thursday. While the Maoists sought resignation of Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal as condition to support extension of the CA tenure the ruling parties refused and asked the main opposition party to agree on contentious issues like integration of former Maoist rebels first.

“The ruling parties are pushing the country to the brink of confrontation and a conspiracy is being hatched to derail the peace process,” said UCPN (Maoist) vice chairman Narayan Kaji Shrestha after the meeting. The tenure of the Constituent Assembly expires on May 28 and there is no possibility of the new constitution getting promulgated on time.

Nepal Maoists general strike enters second day

Kathmandu, May 3 (ANI): The second day of general strike called by the Unified CPN (Maoist) as part of its fourth phase agitation against the government has further crippled normal life across the country on Monday.

Large number of Maoist cadres brought from various districts to Kathmandu are staging demonstrations on the streets of Kathmandu by singing, dancing and occasionally chanting slogans against the government.

Although, the major marketplaces are shut, smaller shops in the city interiors were open briefly in the morning. Vegetable markets had only stale vegetables.

Likewise, due to the stringent imposition of the shutdown people were forced to walk to their offices and destinations. So far, the strike has been peaceful with no reports of clashes and unruly activities.

Maoist activists have marked their presence in major thoroughfares of the capital including Kalanki, Koteshwor, Baneshwor, Chabahil.

Meanwhile, Maoist vice-chairman Dr Baburam Bhattarai has said that there is no alternative left than to continue with the indefinite strike unless there is guarantee of a pro-people constitution and peace.

Nepalnews quoted him as, saying that the nationwide movement his party is waging would be decisive and topple the current government to replace it with a national unity government.

He also expressed his disgust at efforts to give continuity to the current government by issuing threats of army deployment, but said they will never be successful.

Dr Bhattarai, however, said that the party is open to dialogue to resolve contentious issues and find a way out of the current crisis. (ANI)

Domestic issues won’t hurt Cup bid: FFA

Football Federation Australia (FFA) chief executive Ben Buckley has denied the current turmoil surrounding the A-League will damage the country’s World Cup bid.

Gold Coast United joined fellow expansion club North Queensland Fury on the list of A-League franchises facing uncertain futures on Friday, the same day the competition’s chief executive Archie Fraser quit his post.

But Buckley says Australian football has a “positive story”, and he denies the issues surrounding the A-League would hurt the 2022 World Cup bid.

“If you look right across the world and football in many parts of the world suffer the same sort of issues that we do on a local and domestic basis,” he said.

“Whether that’s clubs who are in financial difficulty, finding ways to increase crowds, increase the marketing profile of competitions, we’re not unique to those challenges.

“Many, many countries, even some that are bidding, face those challenges.”

Australia and the United States are rated the front runners to host the 2022 World Cup.

Australia’s bid book – the blueprint for how the nation would host a World Cup – is due on May 14 and the final decision on which nations will host the 2018 and 2022 tournaments will be made in December.

Buckley says the contentious issues of stadium availability and obtaining the cooperation of Australia’s other football codes are being addressed.

“We’re inches away. We’re getting very close,” Buckley said.

“We’ve had a lot of very positive momentum in the last few weeks, assisted by the government task force.

“We’ve worked closely with the task force and the other codes to address some of the issues that we have had.

“But we’re getting very close to having a fantastic document to put forward to FIFA.”

Trinidad leader hints at general election soon

Wed, Mar 31 08:46 AM

Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Patrick Manning has been talking about holding an early general election, as parliament prepares to debate a no-confidence motion against him next week.

“It is coming as sure as night follows day, I’m talking about general elections,” Manning told supporters on Monday night.

A geologist by profession, the 64-year-old Manning has ruled Trinidad and the smaller island of Tobago for 13 of the past 17 years.

He easily won re-election in November 2007 but has faced growing criticism for alleged corruption and spending on big ticket items including public buildings and summit meetings in the energy-rich Caribbean nation, which is a leading supplier of natural gas to the United States.

“One of the most contentious issues is whether the people have been getting value for money given the vast amount of revenues that have passed through the country over the past seven years,” Derek Ramsamooj, a leading political analyst, told Reuters on Tuesday.

Last weekend, at a special convention of the ruling People’s National Movement, Manning told party members that a pre-selection of candidates for the general election will be held on April 7.

He has set no date for the actual vote, however, and a general election is not constitutionally due until 2012.

The no-confidence motion, brought against Manning by opposition leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar, is due to be debated in parliament on April 9. Barring major surprises, it is widely expected to fail since the People’s National Movement holds 26 seats in the 41-member parliament.

For that reason, according to Ramsamooj, Manning’s talk about an early election may amount to little more than a ruse.

It could be aimed at testing the resolve of Trinidad’s two leading opposition parties, which have pledged to form an alliance against Manning’s party, Ramsamooj said.

“On the previous occasion when he called a snap election, Mr. Manning lost and I think he would have learned his lesson from it. So I think the prime minister’s public posturing of contemplating calling general elections is part of a political strategy,” said Ramsamooj, who heads an independent political consultant company, Caribbean Development Strategies.

If the no-confidence motion fails, Manning would not be required to call a general election until 2012.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)
Linda Hutchinson-Jafar

INTERVIEW – U.S.mulls options for South Sudan secession vote

The United States hopes next month’s presidential election in Sudan will set the stage for a “civil divorce, not a civil war” over moves by the oil-rich south to secede, the Obama administration’s special envoy said on Thursday.

Scott Gration acknowledged problems with preparations for the April vote. But he said it should still occur on time so democratic structures are put in place to deal with the looming issue of the status of southern Sudan, which will be decided by a referendum next January.

He said the United States was prepared for any eventual secession vote and was working to resolve contentious issues in hopes of avoiding a reprise of the two-decade civil war that ended five years ago.

“I don’t see that the north has to reinvade the south and start the war again,” Gration said. “If we can resolve these issues, I think there is a fairly good chance that … the south can have a civil divorce, not a civil war.”

Sudan’s north-south civil war claimed 2 million lives and drove more than 4 million from their homes, destabilizing much of East Africa. It was fought over issues of ethnicity, ideology, religion and oil, all of which still fester.

Gration said next month’s elections, even if flawed, would mark a step toward establishing a democratic framework of voter rolls, electoral authorities and monitors that will underpin political decision-making.

“It is important that the election takes place on time, and is done in a way that the people themselves see as credible,” Gration told Reuters in an interview.

“What we are trying to do is get as much done as we can now and then make adjustments that we need to.”

Accusations of fraud have mounted before the vote, Sudan’s first multiparty election in more than two decades, and many opposition parties have called for a delay, saying more democratic reforms are needed.

The only long-term international observer mission in Sudan, the Carter Center, has said the election remains “at risk on multiple fronts” and urged Sudan to lift harsh restrictions on rallies and end fighting in Darfur before the ballot.

Gration, named U.S. special envoy for Sudan last year, has sought to ease tensions that threaten the fragile 2005 peace deal between Khartoum and the semi-autonomous south.

That agreement called for both the elections and the referendum on secession for southern Sudan, which many analysts say could trigger new conflict.

SECESSION IN THE CARDS?

Gration said Washington was already factoring in projections the south will secede.

“Looking at the realities on the ground, it is highly likely that the south will chose independence,” Gration said.

He added Washington was “looking at all options” on how it might support a future independent South Sudan, but was focused for now on trying to ensure a peaceful transition.

Gration said the issues being addressed included the question of citizenship, border demarcation and how to apportion profits from Sudan’s oil wealth, much of which is pumped in the south but shipped out through the north.

“It is a win-win situation that we are trying to get,” Gration said.

He added that would be hard to achieve unless the Khartoum government was willing to discuss better deals for the south as well as for Darfur and other restive parts of the country — something he said was starting to happen.

“While the progress is slow, we are making it,” he said.

(Editing by Peter Cooney)

‘Contentious’ saleyards issue set to be decided

There will be a special meeting of the Warrnambool council tonight to decide the fate of the city’s saleyards.

The meeting will consider closing the council-run saleyards on Caramut Road, and whether to support a proposal by the Victorian Livestock Exchange (VLE) to build and run new saleyards at Cudgee.

The Warrnambool Stock Agents Association president, Kieran Johnstone, says there is a lot of interest in the meeting.

“We would be expecting a lot of people. It’s going to have a very big impact in the economy of Warrnambool,” he said.

The VLE director, Greg Walsh, says whichever option is chosen, it is likely to be controversial.

“Statements have been made that it’s one of the more contentious issues to be dealt with by local government in this region and I think that’s true,” Mr Walsh said.

A council report has recommended the closure of the saleyards and support for the VLE proposal.

‘Bet dieting’ is the latest fad among Brits

London, May 24 (ANI): Brits are increasingly taking to a new method of loosing weight-bet dieting.

This is a trend wherein people join a website, and bet on their own successes in losing certain amounts of weight over definite periods of time.

All weight loss claims are verified by a referee.

Money is withdrawn from the accounts of those failing to meet their targets, and paid to the charities of their choices.

The scheme, which started in the US, presently has over 1,000 followers in the UK.

According to its founders, a particularly effective way to encourage people to lose weight is to get them to nominate a charity with whose views they disagree to receive money should they fail.

“The anti-charity aspect is where we take your money and we send it to an organisation that you oppose should you fail,” the BBC quoted Jordan Goldberg, co-founder of the StickK bet dieting website, as saying.

“We chose some highly contentious issues, for instance global warming, abortion and gay marriage.

“The idea is you choose an organisation whose views are contrary to your own as an added incentive to stay motivated to succeed,” Goldberg added.

The scheme is receiving mixed reactions from people who have been bet dieting.

“I passed the first week, I lost my pound and half. I only lost a pound in the second week and so I failed, so I have given my 3.60 pounds to the charities,” said Robert Carter, an investment analyst from Dorset who has been bet dieting for over a month.

“I think I will lose the weight, it is certainly an incentive. I’m not sure I if have over-gambled, I might end up giving them #3.60 every week, and falling slightly behind.

“But I think it is certainly a good project,” he added.

Professor Richard Ashcroft, of the Centre for the Study of Incentives in Health, remained to be convinced by the long-term effect of the schemes.

“When somebody is in the middle of an incentive scheme they can be quite effective,” he said. .

“People can be quite good at their weight loss programmes, eating less or taking more exercise.

“The problem is once the incentive scheme has finished we don’t know if they carry on being successful after that – we don’t know if people manage to stay with the weight loss or exercise regime once the incentive is taken away,” he added. (ANI)

‘Indian water terrorism’ greater threat than Taliban: Pakistan

Lahore, May 5 (ANI): Taking the Kishanganga dam issue a step further, Pakistan has termed India’s initiative to build a dam on the Indus River as ‘Indian water terrorism’ and said the issue posed a bigger threat to country than the Taliban.

Chairman Indus Water Council Pakistan, Zahoorul Hassan Dahir said India is trying to establish its full control over the Indus River and deprive Pakistan from its share of water.

“After Chenab and Jhelum now India is pursuing a plan to get complete control over Indus River,” The Nation quoted Dahir,as saying.

Dahir said the problems of terrorism, insurgency and Talbanisation were created intentionally to divert attention from ‘Indian water terrorism’.

He said urged the government to take immediate step and approach the International Court of Justice to counter the aggressive Indian move and secure the country’s water rights.

“Pakistan’s efforts for sorting out contentious issues about Baglihar Dam and Kishan Ganga Hydro Power project have failed, therefore government should approach International Court of Justice,” he added. (ANI)

Obama to critics: I’ll bend, but not break

Obama to critics: I'll bend, but not breakWASHINGTON – With Congress pushing back against his proposals for energy, taxes and other matters, President Barack Obama is taking a bend-but-don’t-break posture.

He will compromise on certain details if he must, he signaled at his news conference Tuesday evening, but not on the heart of his key initiatives.

His strategic retreats are a nod to political reality. He is angling to avoid confrontations he probably can’t win, but to sacrifice no more than is absolutely necessary.

On energy, for instance, influential Democratic lawmakers have joined Republicans in opposing Obama’s bid to reduce greenhouse gases through a program that would let companies buy and sell a limited number of permits to pollute.

“When it comes to cap and trade,” the president said, using the proposal’s nickname, “the broader principle is that we’ve got to move to a new energy era. And that means moving away from polluting energy sources towards cleaner energy sources.”

“I think cap and trade is the best way,” Obama said, but he stopped well short of insisting on it.

He did not retreat on contentious issues on which he holds the upper hand. Lifting a federal ban on embryonic stem cell research, he said, was the “right thing to do” despite criticisms from various quarters. Asked why he hasn’t asked Americans to do more to weather the economic crisis, he said, “I think folks are sacrificing left and right.”

Obama was less certain and dismissive on topics in which he faces potentially bruising battles with Congress. For example, he minimized a Senate leader’s proposal to end Obama’s signature tax cut for most working families after 2010.

“When it comes to the middle-class tax cut,” the president said, “we know that that’s going to be in place for at least the next two years.”

“If Congress has better ideas in terms of how to pay for it, then we’re happy to listen,” he said.

Obama said the main thrust of his massive budget proposal is moving the nation in the right direction to turn around the ailing economy. “This budget is inseparable from this recovery,” he said, “because it is what lays the foundation for a secure and lasting prosperity.”

He said he expects “serious efforts at health care reform,” but not lawmakers’ approval of every proposal in his $3.6 trillion budget. “We never expected, when we printed out our budget, that they would simply Xerox it and vote on it,” he said.

Obama used the 55-minute news conference’s last question, on Middle East peace efforts, to summarize his strategy of pressing his main goals while letting critics nibble at the margins if they must.

“When it comes to domestic affairs,” he said, “if we keep on working at it, if we acknowledge that we make mistakes sometimes, and that we don’t always have the right answer, and we’re inheriting very knotty problems, that we can pass health care, we can find better solutions to our energy challenges, we can teach our children more effectively, we can deal with a very real budget crisis that is not fully dealt with in my — in my budget at this point, but makes progress.”

The closest he came to smugness was in noting that once-fierce criticism of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has abated this week.

“It was just a few days ago or weeks ago where people were certain that Secretary Geithner couldn’t deliver a plan,” Obama said of proposals to bail out the financial sector. “Today, the headlines all look like, ‘Well, all right, there’s a plan.’ And I’m sure there will be more criticism, and we’ll have to make more adjustments, but we’re moving in the right direction.”

Obama’s bend-not-break strategy will get a test Wednesday, when he travels to the Capitol to meet privately with Senate Democrats. Some of them are his most troubling critics on energy, health care, taxes and spending.

EU, South Korea postpone concluding free trade pact

Seoul – The European Union and South Korea on Tuesday postponed concluding a Free Trade Agreement after reaching a tentative deal on almost all points, officials said.

Talks over the outstanding issues are to continue in early April on ministerial level at the sidelines of the G20 meeting in London, the chief negotiators of both sides said after the end of the formal negotiations in Seoul.

South Korean chief negotiator Lee Hye Min said that a “provisional” agreement has been reached on almost all pending issues after nearly two years of talks but the deal would only be binding when a final agreement was concluded.

Lee and his EU counterpart Ignacio Garcia Bercero said outstanding contentious issues included rules of origin for products and customs rebates in South Korea.

Talks about the ambitious agreement began in May 2007. The EU is South Korea’s second-largest trading partner after China. (dpa)

Some parties in Nepal trying to topple government

Kathmandu, Feb 10 (ANI): Nepal Minister for Information and Communications Krishna Bahadur Mahara today accused some among the 18 political parties represented in the Constituent Assembly (CA) of trying to topple the government.

His remark comes at a time when the 18 Constituent Assembly parties including the Nepali Congress are demanding to immediately convene the legislative session of the Assembly to settle the contentious issues of new ordinances.

Mahara said it is pointless for the political parties to go against the ordinances at a time when the government is trying to work positively with the new ordinances.

He further urged the parties to assist the government rather than being united to fail the government.

He warned that he will direct party cadres to launch upraise if conspiracies are carried out to topple the government taking advantage of the transitional phase.

Mahara said that the new ordinances are brought as per the constitution, so, it will be promulgated as per the government’s decision, Kantipur reported. (ANI)