Commuters welcome Mamata’s Railway budget

Mumbai/Kolkata, July 4 (ANI): Commuters in Mumbai, by and large, have welcomed this year’s Railway Budget, which Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee tabled in Parliament on Friday.

Most of Mamata’s 13.6 million local train commuters described the budget provisions from travel as satisfactory.

“Bandra-Kurla complex and between Churchgate-Vihar there is a lot of land left for commercial exploitation. I feel it is a good step that a pubic-private partnership will be brought out to begin work on this land. But I hope this partnership gets implemented in a time bound manner,” said Anand Mishra, a daily commuter.

Meanwhile, in Kolkata, people expressed their delight over the budget proposals.

“I feel happy to know about the rail budget. I think it has been presented for all, which include old men and women. New schemes have been initiated for the poor. There are point-to-point trains. Doctors have been provided for long distance travel. Fifty stations will be modified to international standards,” said Sanjay Singh, an office employer.

Banerjee unveiled a mix of populist measures, including cheap tickets for the poor and no increase in freight or passenger fares, as well as steps to boost the sprawling system’s efficiency and finances. (ANI)

Boys feel closer bonds to TV characters than their time-pressed parents

London, May 26 (ANI): Young boys are forming closer ties with TV characters such as Bob the Builder than with their own parents, an expert has warned.

According to leading child expert Sue Palmer, marketers are exploiting children’s trait of becoming attached to a favourite toy or story character by creating a whole industry around it of DVDs, books and toys.

“If parents aren’t careful, and especially if they aren’t around, their son’s relationship with Elmo, Bob the Builder or Fireman Sam could rival his relationship with them,” The Telegraph quoted her, as saying.

“Talking and singing to children is critical to the development of empathy and language, but it does not work with screens.

“The danger is that the child will be more fascinated by the things they see on screen, and not learn and be fascinated by real-life human beings and real-life play,” she added.

While Palmer admits that children of both sexes are increasingly in thrall to technology, boys seem to succumb more to the “unholy alliance between technology and consumerism”, and are more susceptible to the need for “toy consumption”.

According to her, Bob the Builder is particularly appealing to boys because of the “boy-friendly ingredients of tool use, basic mechanics and male status”, and they will come to associate their favourite character with “safety and happiness.”

In her new book, 21st Century Boys, Palmer says the attachment to television characters is part of the toxic childhood that seeks children damaged by a combination of “junk food, junk play and junk culture”.

“Children have, of course, always become attached to favourite toys or other special objects and used them as comforters,” she said.

“What’s different here is the commercial exploitation of a deep human need in children under three years old,” she added.

Colwyn Trevarthern, a developmental psychologist, said allowing children to be dominated by media-driven toy consumption was “tantamount to neglect”.

“There is a sense of poverty in these activities compared with those that develop the natural creativity of children,” he told the Daily Mail. (ANI)

Octomom faces lawsuit for exploiting her kids

New York, May 5 (ANI): Nadya Suleman, the mother of octuplets, has been slapped with a lawsuit for exploiting her eight babies.

Celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred filed a petition in Orange County, California, alleging the history-making mum was taking advantage of the newborns and raking in money without proper consideration of their interests.

Allred argued the babies should have a court-appointed guardian and a separate theatrical agent to ensure they receive their share of any money earned by their fame.

“Rather than choosing to provide her children with a normal life,” The New York Daily News quoted Allred as saying.

“Nadya Suleman, has chosen instead to commercially exploit them, and it appears she plans to continue commercial exploitation of them in the future as well.

“Since she has chosen this path, we believe that the babies are entitled to remuneration,” Allred added.

Allred, who sued the 33-year-old on behalf of former child actor and child labor advocate Paul Petersen, further said that media filming the infants with paid contracts could violate child labor laws.

Peter Scheer, a lawyer and executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition, nodded to the possibility.

Scheer explained: “If a media organization has bought and paid for special access to these children in a way that legitimately can be construed as compensation to them for their services, then it may be that labor laws come into play.”

It was previously revealed that Nadya, the single, unemployed mum-of-14, was living at home with her parents and used in-vitro fertilization to conceive the octuplets and her previous six kids, ages 2 to 7.

The case will be heard on June 22. (ANI)

Selling Obama merchandise might land you in jail

Washington, Jan 12 (ANI): While people might be making a fortune by selling Obama-branded can openers, chocolate chip cookies, chocolate bars, those thriving on the sales of such merchandise might land in jail from January 20 onwards.

In a bid to prevent the commercial exploitation of Obama’s name, Gregory B. Craig, the would be White House counsel for President-elect Barack Obama will have to take action to prevent the selling of Obama merchandise.

Following Obama’s inauguration ceremony, Craig will make sure that the official presidential seal doesn’t get used on T-shirts or beer bottles.

Using the seal on commercial products is contrary to White House policy or even federal law.

For a long time, the counsel’s office has been in charge to complain to businesses about the use of the presidential or White House seals on mugs and such.

In fact, there’s also a federal criminal statute (18 USC 713) against improper use of the “likeness of the great seal of the United States,” or those of the Senate and House.

Those who violate the law could be fined or even hit with six months in jail, reports The Washington Post. (ANI)