Why the Glass is Half-Full on Climate Change Legislation

Last week, Democrats in the U.S. Senate called off their efforts to craft comprehensive climate change legislation, a bill that would have put a price on carbon via a cap-and-trade mechanism. It’s another in a series of disappointing moves by the Senate of late, but that’s a topic for another time…. Instead I’d like to argue that the lack of cap-and-trade legislation won’t actually affect the behavior of most businesses all that much, since they are pursuing energy efficiency and other steps toward sustainability for other reasons.

Our ongoing surveys of businesses around the world reveal that the potential for cost-reduction is the primary motivation for green IT and sustainability investments and initiatives. Reducing energy-related operating expenses in particular was cited by almost 70 percent of survey respondents in our latest reading of April 2010 (see chart below). And we found that other drivers, like improving brand perception (cited by 35 percent of respondents) and simply doing the right thing for the environment (28 percent), are cited more frequently in our survey results than regulatory compliance (17 percent).

In fact, complying with present or prospective regulation has been declining as a motivation for sustainability initiatives over the last 3 years. The figure below shows what’s really driving green actions (click on the image to see a larger version).

What’s going on here? Our half-full perspective is that businesses are finding business rationales for investing in sustainability. Rather than regulation being imposed from without, companies are finding reasons from within to improve their environmental postures.

Their actions are driven by self-interest — appeal to customers, improve margins, increase operational efficiency — and are therefore more likely to be driven deep into the fabric of corporate policies and practices. So while we would rather have seen the Senate step up to responsible climate change legislation, and that would undoubtedly be an incremental spur to corporate action, we remain optimistic that sustainability programs are becoming part of mainstream business operations for most companies and institutions. The same week that the Senate punted on legislation, the executive branch announced that it will reduce indirect GHG emissions by expanding telecommuting and teleconferencing options for federal employees.

The federal government is the single largest energy consumer in the U.S. economy, and as such, its influence as an implementer of sustainability programs, as a role model for state and local governments, and as a purchaser of green technology products and services, will have more influence over the next few years than any climate change would have had.

Chris Mines is a vice president and research director at Forrester Research, advising tech industry strategists. He leads a research team that predicts and quantifies growth and disruption in the technology industry, focusing on the economics and business models of IT suppliers, and emerging trends in technology adoption. Currently, his research is centered on the role of information technology in enabling sustainability initiatives and improving corporate environmental responsibility.

Are Your Cheeseburgers Causing Deforestation?

Consider this thought experiment: Given the importance of the Amazon rainforest to the effort to curb climate change, and the potential value of the thousands of species that live only in the Amazon, and the vastness of the place (See Just how big is the Amazon?), what benefit, if any, can justify destroying a few trees, or a few thousand trees, or even a few thousand square miles of trees? Feeding a hungry family? Providing energy, at a lower cost to a nearby city? Making meat or cheese cheaper in the U.S. or Europe?

These are obviously not theoretical questions. They’re the kinds of questions facing the Brazilian government, and they are relevant to the rest of us because decision we make — about the government leaders we elect or about what to eat for dinner — can have an impact on the Amazon. These are also the kinds of questions that arose frequently during my six-day tour of Brazil last week. The government-organized trip for international reporters focused on the Amazon.

The good news is that the rate of deforestation of the Amazon is decreasing, and dramatically. Six years ago, 27,700 square kilometers of trees were cut down — that’s about 10,700 square miles, an area bigger than the state of Massachusetts. Last year, about 7,000 sq. km. were cut down, and this year the pace is slowing further, satellite photos show.

Americo Ribeiro Tunes, who’s in charge of protecting the forest for IBAMA, Brazil’s equivalent of the EPA, told us: “Brazil is on the verge of a major victory over deforestation.”

Well, maybe, but, along with stepped-up law enforcement, a big reason for the decline in deforestation is the global recession, which drove prices down timber, soy and beef, easing pressures on the Amazon. A strong global economy recovery will likely renew the pressure to destroy forest land to raise cattle or harvest timber, no matter what the laws say.

Besides, there’s plenty of opportunity for legal deforestation of the Amazon. Today, landowners are permitted to cut down up to 20 percent of their land under Brazil’s Forest Code; proposed revisions would raise that to 50 percent. Government-approved plans for industrial development include the controversial Belo Monte Dam, which would be the world’s third largest dame, and the potential expansion of the Urucu Oil Province, which we visited (See Deep in the Amazon, learning to like fossil fuels) also pose a threat. Revenues from Amazon development can be used to promote social and education programs in Brazil, the government says.

This may — may — justify drilling for more oil and gas at Urucu. The Petrobras project has done minimal damage to the rainforest, while providing tax benefits to the region, as well as cleaner energy and cheaper electricity to Manaus, where 2 million people live.

Similar arguments can be made for hydroelectric projects like the Belo Monte Dam, which has been in the works for years. The environmental costs are significant, Reuters reports:

The 6 kilometer-long (3.75 miles) dam will displace 30,000 river dwellers, partially dry up a 100-kilometer (62.5 mile) stretch of the Xingu, and flood a 190-square-mile (500-sq-km) area three times the size of Washington D.C.

And the benefits? According to Amazon Watch, which opposes the project,

The electricity may be exported in large part to eight industrial mining and construction companies: Alcoa, ArcelorMittal, Camargo Corrêa, CSN, Gerdau, Samarco, Vale, and Votorantim.

!–pagebreak–

Without knowing more about what these companies do, how much they pay in taxes and how many people they employ, it’s hard to whether the dam will be worth building. In an interview last week, Brazil’s energy minister, Marcio Zimmerman, said the dam is valuable because it’s a source of carbon-free electricity.

As an outsider, and someone just starting to learn about Brazil, I’m not prepared to offer an opinion about these big infrastructure projects. It turns out, though, that while they attract a lot of controversy — movie director James Cameron of Avatar fame last spring joined a protest against Belo Monte — they aren’t the major cause of deforestation. Cattle ranching is, by far, No. 1:

Which brings us to gouda cheese and weinerschnitzel. The oil and gas from Urucu are necessities, so long as we drive cars and fly in airplanes. Likewise electricity — energy is a driver of economic growth, jobs and wealth. But the soy plantations and cattle ranches? They occupy a great deal of land, employ relatively few people and produce animal feed and meat, much of which is shipped to Europe at the U.S. Ocean-going ships filled with soy, for example, travel from the Amazon port of Santerem to Amsterdam, to feed Dutch and German cows. Meat’s a luxury — millions of people can, and do, live without it.

Destroying rainforests to make cheese, veal and burgers seems like a bad trade-off. At the very least, it’s another reason to eat less meat — not that we really need one. (Among them: Meat is an inefficient and expensive way of getting calories, it contributes to heart disease and obesity, causes of animal suffering, pollutes waterways, etc.) Now that I’ve seen the Amazon, and come to understand the connection between deforestation, cattle and soy, I’m going to curb my own consumption of meat. It’s easy, and it seems like the very least we can do.

Disclosure: My week-long trip to Brazil, with a focus on the environment in the Amazon, was organized by Apex-Brasil, a government-backed agency that promotes trade and investment. It’s sponsored by Electrobras, Petrobras and Banco do Brasil.

China Three Gorges dam can’t tame all floods-paper

July 23 (Reuters) – China’s Three Gorges dam, the world’s largest hydropower project that was built partly to tame flooding, cannot be counted on to hold back all surges that might hit the Yangtze River, state media reported on Friday.

The dam’s own safety would be at risk if floodwaters rushed through at more than 122,000 cubic metres per second, the official China Daily quoted Zhao Yunfa, deputy director of the Three Gorges Corporation’s cascade dispatch centre, as saying.

“The dam’s flood-control capacity is not unlimited,” he said.

Waters near that volume are unlikely to test the dam often. Torrential rains across China brought a peak of 70,000 cubic metres per second flowing into the reservoir earlier this week.

During devastating floods that killed over 4,000 people in 1998, before the dam was completed, the surge was lower.

At least 701 people have died since the start of the year as a result of torrential rains which have swept large parts of southern and central China, and another 347 are missing, the government said on Wednesday.

Future floods could possibly be worse, with climate change raising that possibility. Melting glaciers and more rain in the southwest could both contribute to unusually high water levels.

China’s media have started fretting about whether the Three Gorges project will live up to one of its main long-term objectives. Officials have been toning down claims of the dam’s flood-taming abilities, the China Daily reported.

A report released in June 2003 claimed the dam could control the worst flood in 10,000 years. Four years later that claim was down to the worst flood in 1,000 years, and in 2008 it was trimmed again to the worst in 100 years, the paper said.

Enormously expensive and disruptive, the dam has cost over 254 billion yuan ($37.47 billion) and forced the relocation of 1.3 million people to make way for the reservoir. Towns, fields and historical and archaeological sites have been submerged.

Officials said the dam is opening up China’s interior to economic development, providing clean, cheap energy, and will end centuries of deadly flooding along the lower reaches of the Yangtze river.

Environmentalists have warned for years that the reservoir could turn into a cesspool of raw sewage and industrial chemicals backing onto Chongqing, and feared that silt trapped behind the dam could cause erosion downstream.

China has made scant progress on schemes drawn up nearly a decade ago to limit pollution in and around the reservoir. ($1=6.779 Yuan) (Reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison; Editing by Ben Blanchard)

2 Tools for Cities Crafting Green Building Laws

This week, the EPA released its Sustainable Design and Green Building Toolkit for Local Governments. The Toolkit:

The Toolkit is designed to assist local governments in identifying and removing permitting barriers to sustainable design and green building practices. It provides a resource for communities interested in conducting their own internal evaluation of how local codes/ordinances either facilitate or impede a sustainable built environment, including the design, construction, renovation, and operation and maintenance of a building and its immediate site.

The toolkit can be downloaded here.

The Toolkit was developed by EPA Region 4, and we are very excited to have Karen Bandhauer, an Environmental Scientist at EPA Region 4 for an interview about the Toolkit on August 4.

Yesterday, the Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School issued for comment a draft model municipal green building ordinance. The Model Ordinance is available for download here. According to the Center for Climate Change Law:

Unlike other model ordinances that detail technical specifications, this ordinance presents a framework for the implementation of existing technical standards and a streamlined procedure for their compliance and enforcement. The model ordinance accommodates the rapidly developing field of substantive green building standards by allowing for the adoption of new standards within the ordinance’s framework.

Notably the Model Ordinance attempts to deal with the issues related to preemption, non-delegation, and antitrust, and a separate analysis document is available on the site as well.

I look forward to working through these documents and commenting on them further, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts on these resources.

Shari Shapiro, J.D., LEED AP, is an associate with Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP in Philadelphia. Shari heads the company’s green building initiative. She also writes about green building and the law on her blog a www.greenbuildinglawblog.com, where this post originally appeared.

Australia’s Carbon Neutral Pixel Building is the Greenest Down Under

The Pixel building by Australian development and construction firm Grocon is not only the country’s first carbon neutral office building, it is also the greenest.

Completed this month, Pixel attained a green building score of 100, which exceeded the 75-point threshold for a 6 Star Green Star rating, the highest available under the Green Building Council of Australia’s assessment system.

The building also is seeking certification at the high levels from the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED system and the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodd, better known as the BREEAM, which is based in the United Kingdom.

The innovative building, Grocon CEO Daniel Grollo and project designers were praised by the Australian government and green building leaders at an opening ceremony last week that included Minister for the Environment, Climate Change and Innovation Gavin Jennings and Australian Green Building Council Chief Executive Romilly Madew.

“This building will redefine the way buildings are built in the future. We congratulate Grocon for this outstanding achievement,” Madew said.

Elements contributing to the building’s energy and resource efficiency include:

* Rooftop wind turbines and sun-tracking photo photovoltaic panels that generate electricity.
* A boldly colored and distinctively shaped sun-shade system on the building’s exterior that allows the maximum amount of daylight into occupied space, but prevents excessive glare and heat from penetrating the building envelope.
* Smart windows that open automatically in the evening to enable “night purging,” which enables the heat in the building to escape while allowing fresh air to cool it.
* A vacuum toilet system and other water-saving features and systems that can make the building water-neutral in addition to carbon neutral.
* Rainwater harvesting, stormwater runoff prevention and use captured water that includes irrigation of the building’s reed bed system and vegetative roof.
* An anaerobic digestion system.
* Use of a specially developed concrete, called Pixelcrete, which halves the embodied carbon in the mix.

Project partners include architects at the firm studio 505, building services engineering and sustainability consultancy Umow Lai and structural engineering company VDM Consulting.

Democrats Walk Away from Climate Bill

Senate Democrats on Thursday gave up trying to pass a climate bill before their August recess that would have capped greenhouse gas emissions, citing a lack of time and Republican support.

Instead Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will pursue a drastically pared down bill that will focus mostly on raising the liability cap for oil spills, along with measures promoting energy efficiency, natural gas for transportation, and land conservation. A cap-and-trade program and renewable energy standard will not be included in the bill, expected to be introduced next week.

The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a climate change bill that would have reduced greenhouse gas emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020. In the Senate, two cap-and-trade bills stalled, leading John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) to explore a narrower but similarly-fated bill that would have capped emissions from the utility sector.

Thursday’s development puts the future of climate change legislation in further doubt, with Democrats bracing for midterm election losses that will erode their majorities in the House and Senate.

Although Reid blamed Republicans for failing to support a climate change bill, he never had the full support of all Democrats. Several Democrats from coal-producing regions had long voiced concern over how such a bill would impact their home states.

Reid and Kerry made assurances Thursday that the Senate would continue working on comprehensive climate change legislation.

“As Senator Reid said, this legislation that he has proposed does not replace climate legislation,” Kerry said in a press conference. “It does not replace comprehensive energy legislation. Now President Obama called me before this meeting and said point blank that he is committed to working in these next days at a more intensive pace together with Carol Browner and other members of the administration to help bring together the ability to find 60 votes for that comprehensive legislation.”

There is a chance that Senators may add more provisions to the slimmer bill, but such measures would likely be minor.

Big Business, Big Responsibilities Provides Insider View on Business’ Role in Tackling Sustainability Challenges

SAN FRANCISCO, July 20 /PRNewswire/ — Big Business, Big Responsibilities (Palgrave Macmillan 2010)—a new book coauthored by Dunstan Allison Hope of BSR, Andy Wales of SABMiller, and Matthew Gorman of BAA Ltd—challenges popular perceptions about the role of global business in solving the world’s greatest problems, arguing that companies can take the lead in solving poverty, addressing climate change, and protecting human rights.

“Businesses have a culture that encourages change, innovation, and rapid decision-making, and those are the exact same characteristics that are needed to tackle sustainability challenges,” said Hope, Managing Director at BSR.

With more than 30 years of combined experience leading change toward sustainability in industries as diverse as consumer goods, technology, and transportation, the authors share the inside track on why some of the world’s best-known brands are addressing global challenges as a core part of their business strategy.

“Addressing big challenges such as water scarcity and climate change must be done as part of their core strategy,” said Wales, Global Head of Sustainable Development, SABMiller. “Business success ultimately depends on healthy, thriving communities and the protection of the scarce environmental resources we all share.”

However, the authors maintain that there is more work to be done to advance the sustainability agenda. The book outlines their five main conclusions:

* Shared risks mean shared responsibilities. Big business must understand the real risks posed by challenges such as climate change and water scarcity. Only by sharing the responsibility of addressing these issues will business succeed in the long term.
* Shared risks are best addressed through collaboration. By working with others in their industries and value chains, and in governments and civil society, business will help solve these shared challenges sooner.
* Public trust is more important than ever. Public disclosure of sustainability performance should be as regular and comparable as financial disclosure.
* New regulations and fiscal incentives are required to support business activities for sustainability. Leading companies should play a constructive role in shaping new legislation that will promote real, systemic change on issues such as climate change.
* Successful companies will view sustainability as an opportunity for innovation, not as a risk to be mitigated. Global sustainability challenges can be used to drive the next generation of innovation and develop the successful products of tomorrow.
*
* “The big responsibilities of business are clear: Business must protect the environmental systems they depend on, build consumer trust, and create new, sustainable markets to ensure long-term success,” said Gorman, Director of Corporate Responsibility and Environment at BAA Ltd.
*

Visit www.bigresponsibilities.org for more information about the book, complete author bios, and the latest author blogs.

Endorsements for Big Business, Big Responsibilities

“[The authors] have written a book that captures beautifully the realistic idealism that is at the heart of the modern sustainability movement. Their book is a great guide to the ways that companies are making a difference in the world while also enhancing their competitiveness.”

—Aron Cramer, President and CEO, BSR

“Optimistic, yet grounded in the day-to-day realities of running a business, the authors offer a leadership agenda for the 21st century corporation and for the consumers, regulators, activists, executives, and, above all, employees, who are helping drive this agenda forward.”

—Jane Nelson, Director, Corporate Responsibility Initiative, Harvard Kennedy School

“This unusual book highlights and humanizes the challenges facing those who wish to effect social progress from within a system rather than outside of it. It provides a useful and timely map through the distrust and conflict that can too easily arise where capitalism and activism meet.”

—Jonathan Zittrain, Professor, Harvard Law School, and author, The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It

“This is a book that many of us have been waiting for! Written by three ‘insiders,’ it describes how social pressures are influencing corporate behavior. It will change, for the better, both the tone and substance of debates over corporate social responsibility.”

—Ethan B. Kapstein, Chair in Political Economy, INSEAD Business School

“A new generation of leaders give the inside story on how to become a sustainability-responsible leader. Indispensable.”

—Sara Parkin, Founder Director, Forum for the Future

About BSR

A leader in corporate responsibility since 1992, BSR works with its global network of more than 250 member companies to develop sustainable business strategies and solutions through consulting, research, and cross-sector collaboration. With offices in Asia, Europe, and North America, BSR uses its expertise in the environment, human rights, economic development, and governance and accountability to guide global companies toward creating a just and sustainable world. Visit www.bsr.org for more information.

Charting a Course for Cleaner Cargo in the Transport Sector

Editor’s note: This article was authored by BSR, a global business network and consultancy focused on sustainability.]

During the past 20 years, global commerce has come to depend on an intricate web of supply chains that have revolutionized the way even the most basic products are sourced, assembled, and distributed.

The transportation and logistics sector linking these networks has become critical in supporting greater speed to market, more efficient and cheaper production, higher profits, and sustainable growth.

In spite of this function and its decade-long focus on creating more responsible supply chains, transportation and logistics remain a mostly overlooked area for potential risks and certain opportunities related to climate change.

Understanding greenhouse gas emissions across this complex system — which includes vehicle and vessel owners, logistics providers and freight forwarders, and warehousing and distribution points — will require a greater level of collaboration to support two key things:

• Common language: Most supply chains today are measured by key performance indicators (KPIs), and although current KPIs can be used to measure supply chain efficiency, they do not adequately address sustainability. Partnerships across these networks need to develop common standards, tools, and methods across entire value chains.

• Increased transparency: For reduced carbon emissions in the freight sector as a whole, shippers can shift to more carbon-efficient modes of transportation, optimize routes, and rethink supply chains only if they can quickly and accurately compare options. In order to do this, both carriers (companies that transport products) and shippers (companies that produce the products) need to increase visibility into the transportation supply chain.

This article uses BSR’s Clean Cargo Working Group as a case study to examine how one part of the sector — ocean freight — has begun working on common metrics and increased transparency. It also discusses the opportunities that remain for transportation and logistics industry as a whole to collaborate to reduce emissions.

Clean Cargo Working Group: Starting with Ocean Freight

Ocean transport carries more than 90 percent of the world’s traded goods and contributes between 3 percent and 4 percent of global emissions — or more than those generated by Germany.

Although ships trail behind road and air freight when it comes to emissions, the fact that a large shipping line can transport more than 3 percent of the globe’s gross national product at any given time places the industry in the spotlight. And driven by efforts from retailers and major companies to reduce costs and increase efficiency in the supply chain, carbon emissions represent the most material impacts from container shipping today.

To promote sustainable growth, organizations such as BSR’s Clean Cargo Working Group (CCWG), a supply chain collaboration between carriers (in this case, ocean freight companies) and shippers, are working to collectively address issues such as emissions. The CCWG has done this by developing tools and standards that allow carriers to benchmark performance, and allow shippers to access accurate data on which to base decisions about which carriers to use on a given route.

In 2007, CCWG created a standardized data-collection process that has resulted in the launch of current, industry-leading emissions factors, based on actual data, for ocean freight on all global trade lanes. Already, these efforts have allowed shippers to begin comparing carrier performance and have allowed carriers to identify higher- and lower-performing routes. The group is also finalizing a process to verify the annually collected data, and is seeking to align with other leading supply chain efforts to encourage consistent assessment and quantification of environmental impacts.

!–pagebreak– While these developments signal progress, they represent only one part of the transportation and logistics sector. In practice, shipments move across multiple modes of transport: truck to rail to ship to truck. In order consider all challenges and opportunities, increased levels of transparency and collaboration are needed among all modes of transport.

What’s Next: The Power of Networks

Standards developed to quantify GHG emissions across the supply chain, including the variety of product-related footprinting protocols, are only beginning to experiment with methods that measure transportation impacts.

The sector should begin sharing its tools and processes through an “open source” approach that will allow parallel efforts to be complementary, rather than overlapping.

To take advantage of networks, several things are needed:

• More shipper involvement: Efforts such as CCWG have made progress in bringing a significant portion of the sector together, with more than 60 percent of the container capacity being actively engaged. But it “takes two to emit,” meaning that in order to have a meaningful impact on the sector, more shippers are needed to play more active roles, including retailers, manufacturers, and all those whose goods need to be shipped. To support carriers’ investments in cleaner technologies and processes, shippers must clearly and strongly indicate their commitment to use greener carriers.

• Increased alignment among groups focused on logistics and transportation emissions: A growing number of organizations are currently working on overlapping efforts. CCWG, EPA’s SmartWay Transportation Partnership, EcoTransIT, NTM, and other transportation-focused groups have all made strides in developing tools and methods for different parts of the sector. Additionally, the field of calculator tools for GHG accounting is growing.

What’s missing is active alignment among these tools so that the best methodologies are used consistently and various efforts combine to create a more complete global emissions picture for the sector. Companies seeking to implement these tools can benefit by understanding what is behind them and influencing their development. If companies signal the need for more accurate data across the transportation supply chain, collaboration among organizations will help the industry combine, or make available, the best of each approach.

The payoff for pursuing collaboration is also positive in other regards: Collaboration can enable longer-term solutions such as product innovation among competitors, as evidenced by Maersk Line and NKK’s joint development of emission-reduction technologies and initiatives including waste-heat recovery, emission-abatement technologies, emission-cleaning systems, ballast-water treatment, and alternative fuels. Collaboration can also lead to new service opportunities and increased power to shape public policies that reduce barriers and enable incentives for sustainability.

By taking advantage of opportunities within networks, shifting to lower-emitting modes of transportation, and slowing down supply chains for greater fuel efficiency, collaborative groups have developed the most promising near-term solutions for portions of the supply chain.

The next opportunity — to significantly reduce emissions across the entire sector — will require a step-change in the amount of coordination between networked partners: a greater number of shippers engaged with all modes of transportation.

Indian Ocean sea level rise threatens millions

(Reuters) – Sea levels are rising unevenly in the Indian Ocean, placing millions at risk along low-lying coastlines in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Sri Lanka, scientists say in a study.

Researchers from the University of Colorado and the National Center for Atmospheric Research say the rising sea levels are caused in part by climate change and are triggered by warming seas and changes to atmospheric circulation patterns.

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize last year, President Barack Obama warned that if the world does nothing to confront climate change, “we will face more drought, famine and mass displacement that will fuel more conflict for decades”.

The authors of the latest study say higher seas could exacerbate monsoon flooding, placing crops, homes and livelihoods at greater risk. They argue a better understanding of the changes are needed to improve risk assessment planning for the future.

Sea levels in general are rising globally by about 3 mm (0.1181 inch) a year. Scientists blame rising temperatures caused by the growing amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, that trap heat in the atmosphere.

Oceans are absorbing a large part of this extra heat, causing them to expand and sea levels to rise. Warmer temperatures are also causing glaciers and parts of the ice blanketing Greenland and West Antarctica to melt.

The team of researchers in their study used long-term tide gauge data, satellite observations and computer climate models to build a picture of sea level rises in the Indian Ocean since the 1960s.

They found that sea-level rise is particularly high along the coastlines of the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea, Sri Lanka, Sumatra and Java and that these areas could suffer rises greater than the global average.

But they also found that sea levels are falling in other areas. The study indicated that the Seychelles Islands and Zanzibar off Tanzania’s coast show the largest sea-level drop.

WARM POOL

“Global sea level patterns are not geographically uniform,” said co-author Gerald Meehl of NCAR in Boulder, Colorado.

The study is published in the latest issue of the journal Nature Geoscience.

A key player in the process is the Indo-Pacific warm pool, a large oval-shaped area spanning the tropical oceans from the east coast of Africa to the International Date Line in the Pacific.

The pool has warmed by about 0.5 degrees Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit) over the past 50 years, primarily because of mankind’s greenhouse gas emissions. The warmer water has strengthened two major atmospheric circulation patterns that have a major impact on sea levels.

“Our new results show that human-caused atmosphericoceanic circulation changes over the Indian Ocean, which have not been studied previously, contribute to the regional variability of sea-level change,” the researchers say in the study.

The two main wind patterns in the region are the Hadley and Walker circulations.

In the Hadley circulation, air currents rise above strongly heated tropical waters near the equator and flow poleward at upper levels, then sink to the ocean in the subtropics and cause surface air to flow back toward the equator.

The Walker circulation causes air to rise and flow westward at upper levels, sink to the surface and then flow eastward back toward the Indo-Pacific warm pool.

Strengthening of these two patterns could have far-reaching impacts on AsianAustralian monsoons, Indonesian floods and drought in Africa, the study says.

Indian Ocean sea level rise threatens millions -study

SINGAPORE, July 14 (Reuters) – Sea levels are rising unevenly in the Indian Ocean, placing millions at risk along low-lying coastlines in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Sri Lanka, scientists say in a study.

Researchers from the University of Colorado and the National Center for Atmospheric Research say the rising sea levels are caused in part by climate change and are triggered by warming seas and changes to atmospheric circulation patterns.

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize last year, U.S. President Barack Obama warned that if the world does nothing to confront climate change, “we will face more drought, famine and mass displacement that will fuel more conflict for decades”.

The authors of the latest study say higher seas could exacerbate monsoon flooding, placing crops, homes and livelihoods at greater risk. They argue a better understanding of the changes are needed to improve risk assessment planning for the future.

Sea levels in general are rising globally by about 3 mm (0.1181 inch) a year. Scientists blame rising temperatures caused by the growing amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, that trap heat in the atmosphere.

Oceans are absorbing a large part of this extra heat, causing them to expand and sea levels to rise. Warmer temperatures are also causing glaciers and parts of the ice blanketing Greenland and West Antarctica to melt.

The team of researchers in their study used long-term tide gauge data, satellite observations and computer climate models to build a picture of sea level rises in the Indian Ocean since the 1960s.

They found that sea-level rise is particularly high along the coastlines of the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea, Sri Lanka, Sumatra and Java and that these areas could suffer rises greater than the global average.

But they also found that sea levels are falling in other areas. The study indicated that the Seychelles Islands and Zanzibar off Tanzania’s coast show the largest sea-level drop.

WARM POOL

“Global sea level patterns are not geographically uniform,” said co-author Gerald Meehl of NCAR in Boulder, Colorado.

The study is published in the latest issue of the journal Nature Geoscience.

A key player in the process is the Indo-Pacific warm pool, a large oval-shaped area spanning the tropical oceans from the east coast of Africa to the International Date Line in the Pacific.

The pool has warmed by about 0.5 degrees Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit) over the past 50 years, primarily because of mankind’s greenhouse gas emissions. The warmer water has strengthened two major atmospheric circulation patterns that have a major impact on sea levels.

“Our new results show that human-caused atmosphericoceanic circulation changes over the Indian Ocean, which have not been studied previously,contribute to the regional variability of sea-level change,” the researchers say in the study.

The two main wind patterns in the region are the Hadley and Walker circulations.

In the Hadley circulation, air currents rise above strongly heated tropical waters near the equator and flow poleward at upper levels, then sink to the ocean in the subtropics and cause surface air to flow back toward the equator.

The Walker circulation causes air to rise and flow westward at upper levels, sink to the surface and then flow eastward back toward the Indo-Pacific warm pool.

Strengthening of these two patterns could have far-reaching impacts on AsianAustralian monsoons, Indonesian floods and drought in Africa, the study says. (Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

The Truth About Sustainability Compensation

Sustainability or CSR professionals state that factors other than compensation are largely what drew them to the field; however, they still want to be compensated fairly. As a CSR recruiter, I work directly with hiring managers. It’s my experience that hiring managers want to compensate CSR professionals fairly. Yet, I have also found that neither job seekers nor hiring managers know what is fair.

Given that transparency is a tenet of CSR, it’s ironic that CSR salaries are not more transparent. The truth is that human resources policies, and salaries for that matter, still function on the traditional operating principles of the corporate sector.

In addition, CSR is still a relatively small and nascent field with scant salary information available. Worth noting is a well done 2010 survey conducted by U.K.-based Acre Resources [PDF], which had 595 respondents, of which 150 were based in North America. However, the report does not provide information specific to the United States, nor does it provide salary information by sector or job title. Also, a valuable new report is the just-released Profile of the Profession [PDF] from the Business Council on Climate Change (BCCC), which includes a gender-specific salary comparison, and is definitely worth checking out.

What is the Truth?

I’m hoping to shed light on CSR salaries with the purpose of helping hiring managers and employees benchmark what is fair. The source of this information is the hundreds of sustainability professionals I have interviewed during my searches. In the course of the recruitment process, these professionals disclose their salary.

While the information is anecdotal, I have observed consistency across so many candidates that I am confident that the salary information I share here is valid. As such, this article has useful information for both employers and employees.

Salaries Vary at the Surface; Dig Deeper for Enlightenment

Overall, salaries vary. The salary range that I have observed for sustainability professionals ranges from $48,000 to $500,000. Not too helpful.

However, this wide range narrows when one adjusts for key factors. After taking these into account, the salaries become much more consistent and predictable.

The key factors are:

* The employer (size, sector, industry)
* Job title
* Number of years post-graduation
* Number of years professional experience plus education
* Location (For example, NYC and San Francisco are among the most expensive cities and, therefore, one often finds higher salaries)
* Reporting relationship (number of direct reports and proximity in reporting relationship to CEO)
* The overall package (benefits, bonus, vacation, etc.)

In fact, when I take these factors into consideration, CSR salaries become so consistent that I am able to guess a candidate’s salary with amazing precision.

Next Page: What are the salaries?
!–pagebreak–

What, exactly, are the salaries?

Two of the most important factors are level of the position and experience. Clearly, these are also interrelated. Let’s take a look:

Heads of Sustainability / CSR: Based on my conversations with more than 30 Director-level CSR candidates, $150,000 is the average (mean) income for Director-level CSR positions. Most commonly, Director-level salaries fall in the range of $120K-$130K. A Vice President-level leader earns about $220,000. These positions can easily reach in the $300-$350K range for base salary.

Recent MBA graduates: Those with less work-related experience, such as recent MBA graduates, can expect to earn $100,000 plus or minus $20,000 for a CSR position.

The assumption that sustainability professionals earn less than other comparable positions is false if you hold all the factors listed above constant. I call this the ceteris paribus assumption, the Latin term for “all things being equal.” If you are a hiring manager wondering what salary to offer your new CSR hire, you don’t have to look far; rather, look at who this hire’s ” “near” colleagues will be.

A CSR professional is likely to earn a similar salary to those working in the same department for which sustainability falls. In other words, if the CSR Director sits within Public Affairs, their salary will be similar to their parallel level colleagues in Public Affairs.

To test the ceteris paribus assumption, let’s visit Salary.com. Note that while Salary.com publishes salary information for such seemingly obtuse titles as “Child Life Specialist, a keyword search for “sustainability” and “responsibility” return nothing at all. Salary.com estimates that a Director of Marketing based in San Francisco with an MBA will earn $147,000. This supports my finding, as discussed above, that other marketing salaries compare evenly with sustainability salaries.

Next Page: Three areas where CSR salaries fall short.
!–pagebreak–

CSR Salaries Don’t Always Measure Up

Still, despite the desire to be fair, CSR salaries are not all together fair. They fall short in three areas:

* Transferability
* Comparing to CSR professionals who fit in departments
* Start-ups

Transferability: Lack of internal upward mobility
Once the CSR professional gets her foot in the door and lands a job, eventually they will be concerned about their own career advancement. What comes next for a CSR Manager? Is it a CSR Director? Is there availability in your company for that role? Because the CSR department within any company tends to be relatively small, the employee has fewer options for professional advancement internally. Her non-CSR co-workers have greater flexibility and internal mobility options over time.

My experience leads me to conclude that CSR employees are more committed to sustainability than they are to their employer. This leaves the employee with fewer options with their company. They have fewer options to move within the company to other departments and are more likely to move to another employer. Taking that one step further to salaries, an employee with less room for advancement and mobility has equally fewer opportunities for salary increases that would accompany a promotion.

Comparisons to other departments within the same company
We have seen that a CSR professional’s salary is in line with that of other staff in the same department as CSR sits. But, CSR departments across companies are all over the org chart. Sometimes they fall under Supply Chain, sometimes Human Resources (HR), sometimes Public Affairs. This is where CSR salaries can fall short. For example, careers in human resources are notorious for low compensation. If a CSR position is based in the HR function, then it will likely fall short compared to a CSR department housed in another company’s legal department. Start-ups: Lack of resources
Where salaries clearly fall short is within start-up situations or amongst fledgling small businesses. The unfortunate reality is that some socially responsible businesses pay their hard-working staff unfair wages. Truth be told, the candidate does not have a lot of negotiating power. One would hope that the socially-responsible employer would compensate their employees fairly, but this is not always the case.

How Do the CSR Salaries at Your Company Measure Up?

Do they fall on the low end? This isn’t necessarily a negative. Low salaries can be good for the employee. A low salary increases the employee’s flexibility and security. She becomes more adept at changing jobs. Potential employers find it attractive when a candidate takes on a lot of responsibility with a relatively low salary. Also, in the time of layoffs, her job is more secure.

Do they fall on the high end? While high salaries sound like a favorable position, they are not all good for an employee. It is those with the high salaries that are more likely to be laid off. During a downsizing exercise, the firm will often let those earning high salaries go and then hire someone new at half the salary.

What Can You Do?

A good first step would be for all involved to be more transparent about salaries, just as the CSR field strives to be more transparent overall. As a hiring manager, benchmark other companies. As an employee, agree to share your salary with someone in a comparable role at a comparable company if they agree to do the same.

Secondly, consider the position in light of the factors identified above. A better understanding of these salaries will make both employees and employers feel they are being compensated fairly.

Wales Plans Stricter Green Building Rules

A series of planned measures announced by the Welsh Government this morning will mean new buildings in the country will have to be greener.

Wales will take over powers for new building regulations on December 31, 2011, giving the Welsh Government the legal right to put greener construction rules in place.

The government says it will consult on detailed proposals during 2012 with plans to put new greener construction rules in place for 2013.

Welsh environment minister, Jane Davidson, announced the measures, which she hopes will not only cut carbon emissions but also boost the economy.

Part of the new measures will see new flats and houses built with combined heating, lighting and hot water bills as low as £7.50 a week by 2013, according to Davidson.

Welsh builders will be legally required to use a combination of green technologies including heat pumps, photovoltaics, solar hot water and higher building standards will help achieve lower carbon emissions and fuel bills.

Davidson emphasised the need to “strike the right balance” between Wales’ ambitious agenda on climate change and setting standards that did not make the cost of new building “prohibitively expensive” with the risk of stalling the housing market and losing the social value of new housing.

Davidson said: “My approach is ambitious but pragmatic. My department has been working to identify the policy ‘sweet spot’ — the standard that gives us the most progressive response to climate change we can manage but allows for a healthy construction and property sector.

“The task in setting a target for the first changes has been to find the most environmentally progressive balance between reducing energy demand and maintaining a healthy housing market attractive to construction companies and developers.”

Davidson set out the targets during a visit to a “super green” housing development in St. Athan in the Vale of Glamorgan.

Chapel Close is a development of 16 houses and apartments which have been made available for affordable rent to residents with a local connection.

U.K.’s Forestry Commission Turns to IT for Climate Solutions

The government body responsible for the protection of British forests is one of the organizations using high-tech IT tools to help cut its carbon emissions.

The Forestry Commission is using a tool created by IT firm COA Solutions to track the carbon emissions of each and every employee, to allow it to better manage them.

The Employee Expense Management system allows the organization to keep track of fleet movements and credit card and has been modified to help the commission measure the carbon footprint of its workers.

This helps with compliance with the Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Act 2006 which requires government bodies to measure and monitor their emissions.

Twelve months of emissions data is now available to the Forestry Commission and they are in the process of merging this with other travel-related data to identify the total usage so that appropriate measures can be taken to bring about reductions.

Steve Atkins, head of finance systems development at the Forestry Commission, said: “It made sense to build a carbon measurement tool into our expense management system, because it provides an easy and reliable method of tracking staff transport emissions.”

When staff enter their personal car mileage into EEM, there are now fields for number of miles travelled and type of car used.

The system captures this information and calculates the carbon output for every car journey.

Similarly, carbon emissions generated during taxi, bus, rail and air travel are captured by EEM, allowing the department to track each employee’s emissions on a journey-by-journey basis.

“The EEM system is key to our ability to comply with climate change legislation,” said Mr Atkins.

“We now have carbon emissions data at our fingertips, which is crucial if we’re to achieve year on-year greenhouse gas reductions.”

Tesla Opens Showroom in Copenhagen

Automaker`s 13th Regional Sales and Service Center Will Serve Scandinavia
COPENHAGEN, Denmark–(Business Wire)–
Electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla Motors will open its newest showroom this
week in Denmark`s largest city.

Tesla`s 13th worldwide store is at Bredgade 35, in the heart of Copenhagen,
recognized internationally as one of the world`s most environmentally friendly
places. Copenhagen, which hosted the most recent UN Conference on Climate
Change, generates a growing percentage of its grid`s energy from the famous
offshore wind farm at Middelgrunden. The city is working to reduce CO2 emissions
by 20 percent by 2015.

“People in Denmark believe in social responsibility, and the Tesla Roadster is
the only electric vehicle that combines a world-class sports car with their
values of environmental stewardship,” said Cristiano Carlutti, Tesla`s Vice
President for European Sales and Operations. “We are thrilled that customers in
Denmark and throughout Scandinavia have embraced not only the Roadster but the
core business philosophy of Tesla Motors.”

The US Ambassador to Denmark, Laurie S. Fulton, will kick off festivities at 2
p.m. July 1. Tesla is hosting a media open house from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.,
including test drives, executive interviews and surprise guests. An
invitation-only VIP gala will follow in the evening, and the store will be open
for prospective customers to test-drive the Roadster throughout the weekend.

The zero-emission Roadster does not pay traditional vehicle taxes in Denmark. By
contrast, people who buy conventional petroleum-burning cars pay up to 180
percent car tax on top of the manufacturers` sales price. Tax waivers combined
with expensive gasoline prices mean that the Tesla Roadster is a tremendous
value relative to comparable cars in Denmark.

Tesla`s founding goal is to produce energy-efficient cars for mass-market,
mainstream consumers. Tesla deliberately started with the Roadster, a premium
sports car aimed at affluent “thought leaders,” in order to establish a proof of
technology and shatter the prevailing stereotype that electric cars are
underpowered and unfashionable. Based in California`s Silicon Valley, Tesla has
already delivered more than 1,000 cars in at least 25 countries, and has forged
strategic alliances with Daimler and Toyota to produce zero-emission cars.

The Roadster accelerates faster than other sports car in its price class yet has
zero tailpipe emissions. It consumes no petroleum and plugs into conventional
sockets – at owners` garages or offices, hotels, parking decks or at a growing
number of charging stations throughout Scandinavia. It`s the only sports car
that can be fully or partially recharged by renewable energy – and several
regional customers charge on 100 percent solar power from their photovoltaic
panels or wind power from turbines.

About Tesla

Tesla has already delivered more than 1,000 zero-emission cars in at least 25
countries. With a relentless focus on customer service, Tesla sells cars
directly to clients, both online and at four showrooms in Europe: Zurich,
Munich, Monaco and London, and in Copenhagen starting July 1. Tesla has eight
additional showrooms in North America.

Tesla Motors
Media:
Rachel Konrad, +44 7872 543 250
rachel@teslamotors.com
Sales:
Esben Pedersen, +45 2010 5063
epedersen@teslamotors.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

ANALYSIS-Tussle over forests shows India’s growth dilemma

NEW DELHI, June 24 (Reuters) – India’s maverick environment minister is resisting pressure from some cabinet colleagues to clear forests for mining and roads in a tussle that underlines the country’s struggle for sustainable growth.

Jairam Ramesh wants to protect and expand India’s remaining forest land as part of a strategy to fight climate change, but that could mean giving up mining about a quarter of the country’s mineral reserves, needed to power Asia’s third-largest economy.

He has scrapped or delayed clearance for some 100 mining projects, including those backed by India-focused miner Vedanta Resources Plc (VED.L) and South Korea’s POSCO (005490.KS), drawing protests that he is hurting development in a country acutely short of power and raw materials.

“What you see in this debate is the challenge of the balance between growth and environment protection,” said Sunita Narain, head of New Delhi-based Centre for Science and Environment.

But saving forests in India is more than just about protecting the environment.

Years of uncontrolled mining has pushed tribal people off their forest land, alienating them and fuelling insurgencies that feed off a perceived neglect of the poor.

In India, two-thirds of the population makes a living from farming and a growing Maoist rebellion has capitalised on farmers’ resentment over the government’s seizure of their land for industry.

For example, violence has flared over POSCO’s proposed 12-million-tonne capacity steel plant in the eastern state of Orissa. The steelmaker needs 1,600 hectares (4,000 acres) of land and a large portion of the proposed site is forested. [ID:nSGE64E02M]

Vedanta wants to push ahead with a long-stalled bauxite mine in eastern India but a government panel accused Vedanta in March of violating environmental guidelines. [ID:nSGE62E0TM]

COLLISION COURSE

About 65 million hectares, or 20 percent of India’s land, is forested. And this is also where most of India’s mineral resources lie, including huge deposits of iron ore, and the coal that fuels about 60 percent of India’s power output.

Forests also absorb about 11 percent of India’s greenhouse gas emissions every year.

Ramesh is among a handful of political leaders watched closely for their ability to push an agenda to modernise India against conservative figures in the ruling Congress party focused more on political expediency.

He wants to extend forest cover by about a million hectares every year, putting him on possible collision path with his colleagues from the mining and highways ministries because it could put more areas out of bounds for them.

In his quest to better regulate the mining sector, Ramesh has identified “no-go” zones in forest land that could put about 620 million tonnes of coal, among other minerals, out of reach.

An angry mining ministry has sought the intervention of the prime minister’s office. Officials say it is a tough decision to make in view of the environmental, social and political fallout.

The mining sector’s clout means there could be some redrawing of Ramesh’s “no-go” zones.

But a spotlight on steps the world’s number four greenhouse gas polluter takes to cut carbon emissions, and realisation that taking away forest land from poor tribes will only worsen the Maoist insurgency, could limit changes.

Thousands have died in the rebellion since the armed struggle began in the late 1960s, and the prime minister has described the insurgency as the nation’s biggest security challenge. [ID:nSGE64U07I]

Industry says it is pricing in stronger environmental rules.

“I think environmental norms are going to get tougher and tougher,” Haresh Melwani, chief executive of mining and exporting firm HL Nathurmal & Co, told Reuters.

“It is being seen not only in India, but globally because of public awareness. One has to build in environmental costs into total costs and move on.”

CRACKDOWN ON ILLEGAL MINING

Ramesh has also cracked down on illegal mining, often done with help from local politicians, and brought more accountability in a sector that had minimal environmental regulations.

Stringent environmental checks are seeing some fallout in the mining sector.

“Gestation periods for mining projects are going up because of clearance issues,” said a mining ministry official on condition of anonymity as he is not authorised to speak to media.

Extracting minerals such as coal will be crucial for India if it has to keep growing at about 10 percent in the medium term.

In 2009/10, India’s coal output was 531 million tonnes, about 70 million tonnes short of domestic demand. Coal imports are forecast to rise beyond 100 million tonnes by 2012.

Coal Minister Sriprakash Jaiswal said on Wednesday that the threat of Maoist attacks was hampering coal mining in several states, keeping production lower than the demand from growing industries [ID:nSGE65M04J].

Stronger environmental laws could also impact iron ore, of which India is the world’s third largest supplier, shipping out around 107 million tonnes of the mineral mostly to China in 2009.

But many in the industry are happy at what they say is much-needed clarity in policy.

“I think the industry has been saying for a long time that rather than on a reactive basis, tell us proactively what is permissible and what is not in terms of areas,” Kameswara Rao, executive director, PricewaterhouseCoopers, told Reuters. (Writing by Krittivas Mukherjee; Editing by David Fogarty)

Yellow sub finds clues to Antarctic glacier’s thaw

(Reuters) – A yellow submarine has helped to solve a puzzle about one of Antarctica’s fastest-melting glaciers, adding to concerns about how climate change may push up world sea levels, scientists said Sunday.

Science | Green Business

The robot submarine, deployed under the ice shelf floating on the sea at the end of the Pine Island Glacier, found that the ice was no longer resting on a subsea ridge that had slowed the glacier’s slide until the early 1970s.

Antarctica is key to predicting the rise in sea levels caused by global warming — it has enough ice to raise sea levels by 57 meters (187 ft) if it ever all melted. Even a tiny thaw at the fringes could swamp coasts from Bangladesh to Florida.

The finding from the 2009 mission “only adds to our concern that this region is indeed the ‘weak underbelly’ of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet,” co-author of the study Stan Jacobs at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory said in a statement.

West Antarctica’s thaw accounts for 10 percent of a recently observed rise in sea levels, with melting of the Pine Island glacier quickening, especially in recent decades, according to the study led by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Loss of contact with the subsea ridge meant that ice was flowing faster and also thawing more as sea water flowed into an ever bigger cavity that now extended 30 km beyond the ridge. The water was just above freezing at 1 degree Celsius (33.80F).

SATELLITE BUMP

Satellite photographs in the early 1970s had shown a bump on the surface of the ice shelf, indicating the subsea ridge. That bump has vanished and the 7 meter (22 foot) submarine found the ridge was now up to 100 meters below the ice shelf.

Adrian Jenkins, lead author at BAS, said the study raised “new questions about whether the current loss of ice from Pine Island Glacier is caused by recent climate change or is a continuation of a longer-term process that began when the glacier disconnected from the ridge.”

Pierre Dutrieux, also at BAS, said the ice may have started thinning because of some as yet-unknown mechanism linked to climate change, blamed mainly on mankind’s use of fossil fuels.

“It could be a shift in the wind, due to a change in climate, that pushed more warm water under the shelf,” he told Reuters.

The U.N. panel of climate scientists projected in 2007 that world sea levels could rise by between 18 and 59 cm (7-24 inches) by 2100, excluding risks of faster melting in Antarctica and Greenland. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said the 21st century rise might be 2 meters in the worst case.

Yellow sub finds clues to Antarctic glacier’s thaw

ATHENS, June 20 (Reuters) – A yellow submarine has helped to solve a puzzle about one of Antarctica’s fastest-melting glaciers, adding to concerns about how climate change may push up world sea levels, scientists said on Sunday.

The robot submarine, deployed under the ice shelf floating on the sea at the end of the Pine Island Glacier, found that the ice was no longer resting on a subsea ridge that had slowed the glacier’s slide until the early 1970s.

Antarctica is key to predicting the rise in sea levels caused by global warming — it has enough ice to raise sea levels by 57 metres (187 ft) if it ever all melted. Even a tiny thaw at the fringes could swamp coasts from Bangladesh to Florida.

The finding from the 2009 mission “only adds to our concern that this region is indeed the ‘weak underbelly’ of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet”, co-author of the study Stan Jacobs at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory said in a statement.

West Antarctica’s thaw accounts for 10 percent of a recently observed rise in sea levels, with melting of the Pine Island glacier quickening, especially in recent decades, according to the study led by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Loss of contact with the subsea ridge meant that ice was flowing faster and also thawing more as sea water flowed into an ever bigger cavity that now extended 30 km beyond the ridge. The water was just above freezing at 1 degree Celsius (33.80F).

SATELLITE BUMP

Satellite photographs in the early 1970s had shown a bump on the surface of the ice shelf, indicating the subsea ridge. That bump has vanished and the 7 metre (22 foot) submarine found the ridge was now up to 100 metres below the ice shelf.

Adrian Jenkins, lead author at BAS, said the study raised “new questions about whether the current loss of ice from Pine Island Glacier is caused by recent climate change or is a continuation of a longer-term process that began when the glacier disconnected from the ridge”.

Pierre Dutrieux, also at BAS, said the ice may have started thinning because of some as yet-unknown mechanism linked to climate change, blamed mainly on mankind’s use of fossil fuels.

“It could be a shift in the wind, due to a change in climate, that pushed more warm water under the shelf,” he told Reuters.

The U.N. panel of climate scientists projected in 2007 that world sea levels could rise by between 18 and 59 cm (7-24 inches) by 2100, excluding risks of faster melting in Antarctica and Greenland. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has said the 21st century rise might be 2 metres in the worst case.

Latest Climate Bill Study Finds Environmental Gains, Modest Costs Climate

The latest analysis from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency shows the most recent climate change bill making its way through Congress would have a modest impact on U.S. households, costing each an average of $79-$146 a year.

But the analsyis of the American Power Act, sponsored by John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), doesn’t factor in the benefits of addressing climate change, such as the avoided costs of climate change-related damages.

A separate study from the ClimateWorks Foundation estimated the bill would increase employment levels by 440,000 between 2012 and 2020, with 45 percent fewer emissions by 2030 compared to a business-as-usual scenario.

The EPA released the findings Tuesday, the same day President Barack Obama addressed the nation from the Oval Office for a status report on the BP oil spill. In the speech, Obama used the incident to highlight the need to move the U.S. economy away from fossil fuels.

“Now, there are costs associated with this transition,” Obama said in the speech. “And there are some who believe that we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy -– because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.”

The use of international carbon offsets will help to keep costs low, the EPA found, pegging the price of one metric ton of carbon dioxide-equivalent at $16-17 in 2013, and at $23-24 in 2020 under APA. APA allows up to one billion tons of international offsets per year.

It would include massive subsidies for nuclear power generation, carbon capture and storage technology development, and natural gas, while also using proceeds from a cap-and-trade program to heavily shield consumers and low-income households. Industry experts predicted when the draft was released that the bill it could be the best climate deal businesses will get.

The APA aims to reduce emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and by 80 percent by 2050. The Group of Eight (G8) nations agreed last year to reduce their emissions to 80 percent or more by 2050, with the overarching goal of halving total global emissions by that time. This is under the assumption that developing countries cap emissions in 2015 and reduce emissions 26 percent below 2005 levels by 2050.

The EPA analysis found there was virtually no chance of keeping temperature rise below 2 degrees in a business-as-usual scenario without any climate policy changes. Instead there was a 32 percent chance temperatures would increase by more than 4 degrees Celsius.

If the U.S. and other G8 nations follow through on their commitments, the chances of keeping temperature change below 2 degrees Celsuis in 2100 increase to 75 percent.

In a nod to concerns that U.S. action would be pointless without China and India committing to emissions reductions, the EPA calculated that the chances of keeping temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius would be about 11 percent if the APA went into effect but developing countries took no action.

“If Congress irresponsibly refuses to back up the commitments the administration made at the G8 and in Copenhagen, we would send a signal to other countries that inaction is acceptable — and we would lock in some of the worst effects of global warming,” Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement. “The EPA’s analysis shows we’re already perilously close to exceeding a 2 degree Celsius global temperature increase, which the world community set as a goal to avoid devastating consequences. As the global temperatures go up, so would the pain.”

All Energy 2010 Sparks Strong Presence From Nimlok

NORTHAMPTON, UNITED KINGDOM, Jun 15 (MARKET WIRE) —
Nimlok, part of the P3 Group, are this year celebrating their 40th year
of manufacturing and supplying exhibition stands. Being the leader in the
exhibition industry, Nimlok’s display stands are often found in the big
shows, including this year’s All Energy 2010 event.

All Energy is the UK’s largest renewable energy exhibition and
conference. Rt Hon Chris Hulne MP, Secretary of State, Department of
Energy and Climate Change visited the show where there were over 50
conference sessions held and over 450 exhibiting companies. Among those
companies were Marine Scotland, ATR Group, Vattenfall, MPI and
Southboats, all of which had their exhibition display stands provided by
Nimlok.

Between them, Nimlok supplied just over 175sqm of exhibition stand! The
exhibition stands ranged from portable self build displays, through to
full service custom modular stands. For all five companies, Nimlok
designed the stand, manufactured the stand components, created the
graphics, serviced the whole stand and made the stand available to
pre-view at Nimlok’s headquarters before it went to the show. Nimlok’s
sister agency ‘VU:’ supplied the graphic design and AV content for the
exhibition stands making up a full exhibition service delivery from the
P3 Group.

Last year, Nimlok achieved the ISO14001 environmental standard and also
placed in the top twenty Sunday Times Best Green Company awards. These
achievements were one of the deciding factors for the clients choosing
Nimlok to supply their exhibition stand.

Contacts:
Nimlok Ltd
Mel Page
01933 409409
www.nimlok.co.uk

Copyright 2010, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

-0-