Q+A: Should Avandia be pulled? Questions remain

(Reuters) – U.S. advisers opened a two-day meeting on Tuesday to consider whether GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug Avandia is too dangerous to stay on the market.

Regulators in Europe also will meet this month to debate whether the pill should be restricted or even banned.

Documents released on Friday show the experts strongly disagree about the drug’s safety.

Here are some questions and answers about Avandia:

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH THIS DRUG?

Diabetes is a serious chronic illness and is a direct cause of heart disease, but several studies have shown that Avandia, known generically as rosiglitazone, may itself damage the heart. Both Avandia and rival drug Actos, made by Takeda Pharmaceutical Co and known generically as pioglitazone, raise the risk of heart failure.

Two studies published last month showed that Avandia raises the risk of heart attack and stroke compared to Actos, but a third study showed that diabetics who took Avandia had a lower risk of heart attack, stroke or death than patients taking drugs of a different type.

Avandia is a member of a drug class called thiazolidinediones or glitazones. They affect a gene called PPAR-gamma and help the body use insulin more effectively. The first drug in the class, Rezulin or troglitazone, was pulled from the market in March 2000 after 63 people who took it died from acute liver failure and nearly 40 others needed liver transplants.

WHO DID THE STUDIES?

One of the studies was a “meta-analysis” of 56 trials involving people taking Avandia or other diabetes drugs. Done by longtime Avandia critic Dr. Steven Nissen at the Cleveland Clinic it found those taking Avandia were 28 percent to 39 percent more likely to have a heart attack.

The second study by David Graham and colleagues at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services found people taking Avandia had 1.25 times the risk of heart failure compared with those taking Actos, 1.27 times the risk of a stroke and 1.14 times the risk of dying.

The third study, paid for by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, found that adding Avandia to the mix of diabetes drugs lowered the risk of heart attack, stroke or death by 28 percent.

WHY IS THIS DRUG STILL ON THE MARKET?

That is just what consumer groups such as Public Citizen and Consumers Union are asking.

But it can be difficult to show that a drug is dangerous, especially in a disease like diabetes, which is already usually complicated with heart disease and other symptoms as well.

More than 700 pages of internal documents released on Friday showed FDA staffers disagree about how to interpret the studies.

Members of the U.S, Congress, including Republican Senator Charles Grassley, Democratic Representative Rosa DeLauro and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, have questioned the FDA’s regulation of Avandia.

A current trial called Tide is designed to directly compare Avandia and Actos.

The FDA has scheduled an advisory panel meeting on the heart safety of Avandia on July 13-14. The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use will discuss the issue in London on July 19-22.

HAVE PEOPLE SUED OVER THIS?

Yes. In May, a lawyer involved in some of the suits said Glaxo had settled with nearly 700 people who said they suffered harm because they took Avandia.

Joseph Zonies, one the lead plaintiffs’ lawyers in the federal case pending in a U.S. District Court, estimated that 3,000 cases have been filed in the federal litigation and says another 4,000 to 6,000 could be filed later.

WHY IS THIS DRUG NECESSARY?

The World Health Organization estimates that 171 million people globally had diabetes in 2000 and projected that number will nearly double by 2030 to 366 million.

Diabetes raises the risk of heart disease, stroke, kidney failure and other illnesses. Uncontrolled blood sugar levels can damage the blood vessels, and patients can lose toes, feet and legs to diabetes, while kidneys can fail and damage in the eyes can cause blindness.

While diet and exercise can control diabetes, many people also take prescription drugs.

WHAT OTHER DRUGS ARE THERE?

Diabetics have 12 classes of drugs to choose from.

New drugs include Merck’s Januvia and AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Onglyza. Many other drugs are in clinical trials, attacking diabetes with a variety of approaches.

Older drugs such as metformin and a class known as sulfonylureas are available generically and can also help lower blood sugar.

(Writing by Maggie Fox; Editing by Lisa Richwine and Tim Dobbyn)

Removing kidney of elderly patients with localized kidney cancer does not prolong their lives

Washington, May 10 (ANI): If a new study is to be believed, then removal of an entire kidney doesn’t prolong lives of patients aged 75 and above who have confined kidney tumours.

In fact, they suffer from other medical problems, which should be given due cancer-related care, such as observation or treatments that spare the non-cancerous parts of their kidneys.

To investigate if surgical kidney removal, or nephrectomy, improves survival when compared with active monitoring or kidney-sparing surgery, Steve Campbell, of the Cleveland Clinic and his colleagues conducted a study.

The doctors analysed information from 537 patients with localized kidney tumours that were 7cm in diameter and were detected at age 75 years or older.

Twenty percent of these patients were closely observed, 53 percent had kidney-sparing surgery, and 27 percent underwent a nephrectomy.

After following up for 4 years, 28 percent of patients died, the most common cause of death being heart-related (29 percent). Cancer progression was responsible for only four percent of deaths. Older age and additional medical conditions increased patients” risk of dying during the follow-up period, but choice of treatment did not.

Surgical removal of kidney seemed to indicate accelerated dysfunction of the remaining kidney and also appeared to increase patients” risk of dying from cardiovascular causes.

“Current research is indicating over-treatment of localized renal tumors, and our data suggest that active surveillance is a reasonable strategy and one that is greatly under-utilised in the elderly population,” the authors wrote.

They added that the potential benefit of kidney-sparing surgery in elderly patients who have the lowest risk for heart-related deaths and the greatest life expectancy warrants further investigation.

The study is published online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society. (ANI)

Weight loss can prevent kidney disease progression in obese patients

Washington, Sept 18 (ANI): Shedding extra pounds can preserve kidney function in obese people with kidney disease, according to a new study led by Indian origin scientist from Cleveland Clinic.

Weight loss can improve a number of health problems, like it can improve control of diabetes, lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels, and reduce the effects of heart disease.

During the study, Dr Sankar Navaneethan, and his colleagues analysed the studies that examined the effects of weight loss interventions in obese kidney disease patients.

It showed that weight loss attained through diet and exercise reduces proteinuria (excess excretion of protein in the urine-a hallmark of kidney damage) and may prevent additional decline in kidney function in obese patients with kidney disease.

Studies also showed that surgical interventions normalize the filtration rate of the kidneys in obese patients with high filtration rates (a risk factor for the development of kidney disease).

While the findings imply that weight reduction may prevent the progression of kidney disease in obese kidney disease patients, the authors noted that there were only a small number of studies available for analysis and additional high-quality long-term studies on this topic are needed.

The study appears in Clinical Journal of the American Society Nephrology. (ANI)

Soon, simple jab to prevent prostate cancer

Washington, Sept 8 (ANI): A simple jab may soon help prevent prostate cancer, say researchers.

The research team from University of Utah and University of Columbia have identified a virus, known to trigger leukaemia, in malignant human prostate cancer cells.

The research team hopes that the virus, XMRV (Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus), would open opportunities for developing diagnostic tests, vaccines, and therapies for treating the cancer.

“We found that XMRV was present in 27 percent of prostate cancers we examined and that it was associated with more aggressive tumours,” said Dr Ila R. Singh, associate professor of pathology at University of Utah and the study’s senior author.

“We still don’t know that this virus causes cancer in people, but that is an important question we’re going to investigate,” Singh added.

The study also makes it evident that XMRV is present in malignant cells, and that XMRV is a gammaretrovirus, a simple retrovirus first isolated from prostate cancers in 2006 by researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and the Cleveland Clinic, known to cause cancer in animals.

During the study, the researchers examined more than 200 human prostate cancers, and compared them to more than 100 non-cancerous prostate tissues.

They found 27 percent of the cancers contained XMRV, compared to only 6 percent of the benign tissues.

The viral proteins were found almost exclusively in malignant prostatic cells, suggesting that XMRV infection may be directly linked to the formation of tumors.

The study is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (ANI)

First US near-total face transplant recipient unveils results of her surgery

London, May 6 (ANI): Forty-six-year-old Connie Culp, a shotgun attack victim who was the first person in the U.S. to receive a near-total face transplant, has unveiled the results of her surgery.

The woman was left without a nose, a palate or lower eyelids after being attacked by her husband in 2004.

Her operation at the Cleveland Clinic in the state of Ohio lasted 22 hours.

A team of 11 surgeons, who operated on her, transplanted about 80 per cent of her face using facial tissue from a dead woman that was placed like a mask atop her own.

They said that Culp, who was missing bone support and had been unable to eat or breathe without a tube in her windpipe, could now perform functions normally.

“We think this … procedure has changed her life dramatically,” Sky News quoted Maria Siemionow, the clinic’s director of plastic surgery research, as telling reporters.

Even though it was reported in December that America’s first face transplant had been conducted, Culp’s identity and the incident that had disfigured were kept secret.

“Well, I guess I’m the one you came to see today,” she said after being helped up to a podium at a press conference.

She, however, added: “I think it’s more important that you focus on the donor family that made it so I could have this person’s face.”

Culp recalled that when plastic surgeon Risal Djohan first looked at Ms Culp’s injuries, “he told me he didn’t think, he wasn’t sure, if he could fix me, but he’d try.”

“Here I am, five years later. He did what he said – I got me my nose,” she said with a laugh.

Siemionow said that the transplant “was the most complex functional restoration in the world today”. (ANI)

Face Transplant For “Connie Culp” Photos and Video

Face Transplant For AP: CLEVELAND — Five years ago, a shotgun blast left a ghastly hole where the middle of her face had been. Five months ago, she received a new face from a dead woman.

Connie Culp stepped forward Tuesday to show off the results of the nation’s first face transplant, and her new look was a far cry from the puckered, noseless sight that made children run away in horror.

Culp’s expressions are still a bit wooden, but she can talk, smile, smell and taste her food again. Her speech is at times a little tough to understand. Her face is bloated and squarish, and her skin droops in big folds that doctors plan to pare away as her circulation improves and her nerves grow, animating her new muscles.

Scroll down for graphic photos, video.

But Culp had nothing but praise for those who made her new face possible.

“I guess I’m the one you came to see today,” the 46-year-old Ohio woman said at a news conference at the Cleveland Clinic, where the groundbreaking operation was performed. But “I think it’s more important that you focus on the donor family that made it so I could have this person’s face.”

Up until Tuesday, Culp’s identity and how she came to be disfigured were a secret.

Culp’s husband, Thomas, shot her in 2004, then turned the gun on himself. He went to prison for seven years. His wife was left clinging to life. The blast shattered her nose, cheeks, the roof of her mouth and an eye. Hundreds of fragments of shotgun pellet and bone splinters were embedded in her face. She needed a tube into her windpipe to breathe. Only her upper eyelids, forehead, lower lip and chin were left.

Connie Culp Photos

Connie Culp Video First Full Face Transplant Recipient Speaks

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp26HIdPyYY[/youtube]