All octopuses are venomous

Washington, April 16 (ANI): Contrary to the belief that only blue-ringed octopuses are venomous, scientists have now found that all octopuses are poisonous.

Scientists from the University of Melbourne, University of Brussels, and Museum Victoria say that all octopuses and cuttlefish, and some squid are venomous.

The researchers say that their study suggests that they all share a common, ancient venomous ancestor and highlights new avenues for drug discovery.

Dr Bryan Fry from the Department of Biochemistry at the Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, revealed that while the blue-ringed octopus species remain the only group that aredangerous to humans, the other species have been quietly using their venom for predation, such as paralysing a clam into opening its shell.

“Venoms are toxic proteins with specialised functions such as paralysing the nervous system” he said.

“We hope that by understanding the structure and mode of action of venom proteins we can benefit drug design for a range of conditions such as pain management, allergies and cancer,” he added.

Scientists have examined many creatures for years as a basis for drug development. However, octopuses, cuttlefish and squid remain an untapped resource.

Fry now says that their venom may represent a unique class of compounds.

For the study, his team obtained tissue samples from cephalopods ranging from Hong Kong, the Coral Sea, the Great Barrier Reef and Antarctica.

Analysing the genes for venom production from the different species, the researchers found that a venomous ancestor produced one set of venom proteins, but over time additional proteins were added to the chemical arsenal.

They say that the origin of such genes also sheds light on the fundamentals of evolution, presenting a prime example of convergent evolution where species independently develop similar traits.

Fry has revealed that the research team will next try to determine why very different types of venomous animals seem to consistently settle on the similar venom protein composition, and which physical or chemical properties make them predisposed to be useful as toxin.

“Not only will this allow us to understand how these animals have assembled their arsenals, but it will also allow us to better exploit them in the development of new drugs from venoms,” said Fry.

“It does not seem a coincidence that some of the same protein types have been recruited for use as toxins across the animal kingdom,” the researcher added.

The study has been published in the Journal of Molecular Evolution. (ANI)

How 3 broad classes of camouflage body patterns achieve visual deceit

Washington, January 16 (ANI): A senior scientist at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) has discovered three broad classes of camouflage body patterns by studying the cephalopods, which include squid, octopus, and cuttlefish.
Roger Hanlon, who has spent 35 years studying animal camouflage, has also found how the three pattern classes – termed uniform, mottled, and disruptive – achieve several mechanisms of visual deceit.

“Cephalopods are the most changeable animal on earth for camouflage. There is no animal group that can equal it for speed or diversity of disguise. They have the widest range of patterns and they have the fastest change. Therefore, they are a good model to help unravel the general principles of camouflage,” the researcher says.

Hanlon is developing a mathematical description of camouflage patterns that can be used comparatively across the animal kingdom to better understand this biological phenomenon.

He and his colleagues have developed a software program that measures the degree of contrast and granularity (spatial scale) in the light and dark patches on the animal’s body.

The researchers have revealed that the two metrics allow them to broadly sort all kinds of photographs of animal camouflage into the three classes of body patterns.

Uniform and mottle patterns are what most people recognize as camouflage, and these patterns function by resembling the background. However, such background matching is not so simple.

Hanlon’s study on cephalopods has revealed that there are few high-fidelity matches to the background, and that there are varying qualities of match in terms of colour, intensity, pattern or 3-dimensional texture of the skin.

He and his colleagues, however, say how to measure these in terms of visual perception by the predator is still a daunting task.

As regards disruptive coloration, the researcher say that these patterns tend to obscure the outline of the animal against certain backgrounds.

They say that a predator may easily detect the patter, but it will not recognise it as prey.

The researchers explain this with an example of a panda bear in a tree, whose large-scale black and white patches would appear to be disjunctive areas of shadow and bright light, rather than being recognized as animal skin, if viewed by looking up into the brightly lit sky.

Hanlon’s research marshals evidence that strongly supports the notion that disruptive coloration is a bona fide mechanism of camouflage.

He is now planning to quantify camouflage body patterns in fish.

“We hope that other investigators will pick up this technique to describe and quantify camouflage patterns in other animal groups. Visual predator-prey interactions are one of the most widespread phenomena known in natural selection. In terms of being an evolutionary force, camouflage is one of the great defences,” he says.

A research article on Hanlon’s work has been published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. (ANI)