Five killed, 18 wounded in Iraq bomb attack

July 9 (Reuters) – A suicide car bomber killed five people, including three Iraqi army officers, and wounded 18 on Friday in Baghdad, police said, after a series of attacks aimed at Iraqi Shi’ite pilgrims killed dozens in recent days.

The blast took place near an Iraqi army checkpoint in the mainly-Sunni Ghazaliya district of western Baghdad, police said. Out of the 18 wounded, at least two were army personnel, police said.

Thousands of Shi’ite pilgrims have trudged resolutely through blood-spattered streets over the past few days in an annual ritual paying homage to the Shi’ite Imam Moussa al-Kadhim, despite suicide and roadside bombs that killed at least 38 and wounded hundreds. [ID:nLDE66711T]

Iraq is on high alert for insurgent attacks after a March 7 national election produced no clear winner and left the country adrift in political uncertainty.

Overall violence has dropped sharply since the height of sectarian carnage in 2006-7. But daily bombings and killings continue, suggesting insurgents are trying to exploit the vacuum as political rivals jostle for power. (Reporting by Baghdad newsroom; Editing by Rania El Gamal and Jon Boyle)

‘We’re sorry… Target was goods train’

Hours before he was named as the prime suspect in the Jnaneswari train disaster, Bapi Mahato told The Indian

Express that he was “sorry” for what had happened, and that the targeting of the passenger train was a “mistake”.

Speaking to the Express inside the Romroma forests, 8 km from the accident site, after much persuasion, Mahato, a key leader of the PCAPA, said: “We are sorry. We never wanted these innocent civilians to die. Trust me, we targeted the goods train. But somehow, we were fed wrong information that the goods train would cross through this track and we removed pandrol clips from a long stretch. We did not want to harm civilians. There must have been some miscalculation.”

However, when the Express contacted him again after he had been named the “mastermind” of Thursday night’s carnage by Bengal DGP Bhupinder Singh and a manhunt launched for him, Mahato denied all role in the attack.

Speaking over the cellphone, he said: “We are being framed by the CPM and police. I investigated and came to know that our cadres were not involved in the sabotage. CPM goons, including Arjun Mahato and Lolit Sahoo of Pathuri and Kotushol, are the main persons behind the incident… Everybody knows that a CPM minister held a meeting in Barjudi Primary school just the night before the incident happened.”

However, based on intercepts of calls among Maoist activists, police and investigating agencies believe that the Jhargram CPI (Maoist) squad, including 12 cadres led by a 15-year-old boy named Kanu, and the local unit of the PCAPA (People’s Committee Against Police Atrocities) removed the pandrol clips and were helped by villagers. The calls also indicate that some gangmen of the Railways were “engaged” forcibly to remove the clips from both the Up and Down tracks. A senior CID official said they had zeroed in on three of the gangmen.

Raj Kanojia, ADG, CID, who visited the accident site today, said there was no evidence of a blast. “It was sabotage and it was done by Maoists. There is no doubt about it,” he said.

Call intercepts also reveal that a quarrel has broken out between senior leaders over the attack. “One group is blaming another… A blame game has started within the CPI (Maoist) and the PCAPA,” a senior police official said.

Bapi Mahato leads the PCAPA in the Guimara-Lalgeria panchayat area under Jhargram, controlling a vast area covering over 20 villages and railway stations like Khemashuli, Sardiha, Banstala and Jhargram.

Express reporters could enter villages around the accident site only with his sanction. The road leading to Romroma forests and the villages surrounding it were blocked with felled trees. Initially, Mahato was reluctant to surface from his forest hideout and sent emissaries. He said he wasn’t feeling well and hadn’t slept properly because of raids by security forces. It was on persistent request that he agreed to meet.

While regretting the civilian deaths at the meeting with Express, Mahato justified the Maoist anger. “Whatever we do, we do with the sanction of local villagers. Our villagers are being tortured mercilessly by security forces and in the wee hours of Thursday, several teams of security forces came along with ‘Harmads’ (armed goons backed by the CPM) into villages and picked up people indiscriminately. So they were seething with anger… you would understand,” he said.

Asked about his links with Maoists, Mahato evaded a straight answer. “We stay out of our homes for fear of security forces, and to stay in the jungles you need arms. There are animals, elephants and one has to have something to defend himself. The moment we pick up arms, we are branded Maoists,” he defended.

He was more keen to discuss issues concerning the villagers. He showed an irrigation canal which, he said, could bring smiles to 16 villages if maintained properly. “Just Rs 4 lakh is needed from the government to repair the 32 gates. But those are lying in the same condition since 1971,” said Mahato.

With the police on the hunt for him, the PCAPA leader said over the phone that he wasn’t worried. “Nobody can prove my involvement. I am only concerned and tense about my high school results which will be out in a couple of days,” Mahato said. A student of Manikpara High School, this is his third attempt to pass high school.

Aged 25, he joined the PCAPA a year and a half ago and was assigned the task of leading the Anchal Committee after the CPI (Maoist) Central Committee expelled three leaders in the area for the October 2009 detainment of Rajdhani Express. The next month, at a meeting in Romroma forests, attended by senior leaders including Bikash, Mahato was made the leader of the PCAPA.

Mahato’s father Khudiram was reportedly arrested in 1994 when Bapi was just 10. “I wanted to grow up normally. But one day some miscreants hurled a bomb at a neighbour’s house. My father was unnecessarily picked up and jailed for several years.”

In 2008, Mahato said, he applied for a CRPF constable’s job. “I cleared, but I was asked to deposit a huge sum for the job. I did not have the money.”

Sindh High Court issues notices to Musharraf, Interior Ministry over May 2007 carnage

Karachi, May 15 (ANI): The Sindh High Court (SHC) has issued notices to former President General Pervez Musharraf and the Interior Ministry on a petition seeking their nomination as respondents in a case concerning the May 12, 2007 carnage.

Over 50 people were killed and dozen others were injured in violence that erupted on the said date when the then deposed Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry arrived in Karachi to address a lawyers gathering.

The court has also asked Musharraf to appear before it on the next hearing i.e on June 1.

The petition, which was filed by noted human rights activist Iqbal Kazmi, also named Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) chief Altaf Hussain, Sindh Home Adviser Waseem Akhtar, Home Secretary Brigadier (retire) Ghulam Muhammad Mohtarrum, and various other top police officials as respondents in the case, The Daily Times reports.

Earlier, the Abbottabad District and Sessions court while declaring former President General Pervez Musharraf an‘absconder’ directed authorities to confiscate his property. (ANI)

Bathani Tola massacre: Three sentenced to death, 20 get life term

Ara (Bihar), May 12 (ANI): A court here on Wednesday awarded death sentences to three persons and life imprisonment to over 20 others in connection with the infamous Bathani Tola massacre in Bhojpur District in 1996 in which 21 Dalits were killed.

Additional District and Sessions Judge A K Srivastava announced the quantum of punishment for the accused.

Earlier on May 5, Srivastava had convicted 23 accused persons and acquitted 30 others for want of evidence in connection with the carnage that took place under Sahar block of Bhojpur district on July 11, 1996 by suspected activists of Ranvir Sena, a private militia of land owners.

Around 70 Sena men had raided the village and killed 21 Dalits, mostly women and girls, including two babies in the age group of three to nine months. (ANI)

Kasab’s death sentence would not hinder talks with Krishna: Qureshi

Islamabad, May 8 (ANI): The death sentence awarded to Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone surviving November 2008 Mumbai carnage gunman, would not affect any future talks between New Delhi and Islamabad, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has said.

Talking to reporters here, Qureshi clarified that the Mumbai special anti-terror court’s judgement against Kasab would not hinder the proposed talks between the foreign ministers of the two neighbouring countries.

He said the date and venue of the meeting would soon be finalised.

Qureshi said Pakistani experts were yet to review the judgement in the Kasab case.

It may noted that during their meeting on the sidelines of the XVIth South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Summit in Thimpu last month, both Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Yousuf Raza Gilani had mandated their respective foreign ministers and foreign secretaries to meet and work out the modalities for resuming deliberations between the two estranged countries.

Condemning the ghastly Mumbai terror attacks, in which 166 people were killed and over 200 injured, Qureshi said Pakistan has also been a victim of terrorism.

“Those who lost their relatives in terror incidents in the country could feel the pain of people who suffered in the Mumbai attack,” The Daily Times quoted Qureshi, as saying. (ANI)

Kasab death sentence is not lead news in Pakistan

Islamabad, May 7 (IANS) Pakistan’s English media Friday front-paged but did not lead with the death sentence awarded to Ajmal Amir Kasab for his role in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, focusing instead on an emerging dispute between the government and the judiciary on reopening a graft case against President Asif Ali Zardari.

There were no editorials but this was not surprising as Pakistani newspapers normally take more than a day to react to events of this nature.

The only comment, as it were, was by the Dawn’s New Delhi correspondent, who noted: ‘As an Indian judge closed a sordid chapter in Delhi’s ties with Islamabad on Thursday by handing the death sentence to the sole surviving Pakistani gunman involved in the November 2008 carnage in Mumbai, the Indian government signalled that a more serious threat to the country’s internal security came from a Maoist rebellion raging in central and eastern India, not from across the border.’

‘In an unusual advisory that seemed to presage the government’s shift in focus away from Pakistan, whose foreign minister is widely expected to resume talks with his Indian counterpart later this month, the Indian home ministry warned that it was the Maoists that planned to overthrow the Indian state in a bloody revolt, currently located in the central Indian forests,’ Jawed Naqvi wrote.

Dawn, as also The News, carried an identical 400-word agency report on Kasab’s sentence. Daily Times carried a similar report, but compressed it to less than 100 words.

‘Indian judge sentences Kasab to death,’ said the headline in The News. ‘Kasab sentenced to death on four murder counts’, the headline in Dawn said. ‘Ajmal Kasab sentenced to death’ said the headline in Daily Times.

Writing in The News, under the headline ‘Kasab’s sentence draws cautious Pak response’, Mariana Baabar noted that Islamabad’s response might have been ‘cautious’, but ‘the authorities did not mince words while strongly condemning what happened in Mumbai’.

The reference was to Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit’s weekly briefing hours after the Kasab judgment was delivered during which he said the verdict would be closely examined before a comment was offered.

Baabar also pointed out that Pakistan seemed to be distancing itself from Kasab.

‘The spokesman underlined that while it was incumbent upon the government to provide assistance to its nationals abroad, if possible, it was also important to note that ‘we need to make a distinction as to where assistance is legitimate and where it is not’,’ she wrote.

She also said that during the briefing Basit ‘was careful not to use the words ‘composite dialogue’ that the Indians have become allergic to’. India had suspended the sub-continental dialogue in the wake of the Mumbai attack.

The Indian and Pakistani prime minister, at their April 29 meeting on the sidelines of the SAARC summit in Thimphu, had mandated their foreign ministers and foreign secretaries to work out the modalities of restoring trust, paving the way for substantive dialogue covering all issues between them.

Kasab was Thursday sentenced to death for his role in the 26/11 carnage by a special court in Mumbai that said he had no right to live.

Pakistan’s Supreme Court Thursday came down hard on the government after the attorney general informed it that a $60 million graft case against President Zardari could not be reopened. This case, as also those against some 160 others, including the president’s slain wife Benazir Bhutto had been closed after then president Pervez Musharraf had promulgated an amnesty against graft in October 2007.

The Supreme Court had nullified this last year and ordered that all the cases be reopened.

Pak unlikely to take out nurtured ‘India-centric’ terror outfits from its soil: Experts

Washington, May 7 (ANI): In wake of the failed Times Square bombing plot, which apparently had originated from Pakistan, the United States is mounting pressure on Islamabad to take on all those Islamic terror groups flourishing inside its territory, however, history suggests, action if any against these terror outfits, would be selective, analysts have said.

The Pakistan government may have offered immediate and all help to Washington, but the extent of the help may hinge again on which groups are ultimately fingered, a report in the Christian Science Monitor said.

History suggests that Islamabad has been reluctant to take any action against groups, which the state had once nurtured, especially to run a proxy war against India.

More recently, following the Mumbai terror attacks, Pakistan tried hard to deny the role of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and its associate groups in the carnage, but it was forced to act against the LeT and its front face the Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) under immense international pressure.

The Pakistani establishment is not interested in dismantling these groups entirely and prefers to let them lie dormant. Members of the banned outfit are still able to congregate and hold rallies where they raise extremist slogans, the report said.

Observers also underline the fact that Pakistan Army still has a soft corner for these terror groups, and its unlikely that the international community would see action against them.

“We still see some soft corner in the heart of the military establishment for other militant groups. So it”s at least likely that the Pakistani military at this time, after putting so much pressure against TTP, won”t go after other groups and risk losing the ground they have made against the TTP,” said Abdul Basit, a researcher at the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies in Islamabad. (ANI)

Kashmiri agent dubbed ‘Mr. XXXXX’ let into Canada, but UK lawmaker was not

Toronto (Canada), Apr.29 (ANI): A British lawmaker, George Galloway, was barred entry to Canada last March after the government deemed him a supporter of a terrorist organization, but surprisingly, a Kashmiri agent dubbed ‘Mr. XXXXX’ was let in despite giving 40,000 rupees to an Islamist terrorist.

Galloway scuttled his 2009 Canadian speaking tour upon being declared a persona non grata, but a man with a vastly more checkered past landed on the tarmac of Vancouver International Airport.

According to the Globe and Mail, under questioning from federal agents, the South Asian caught with a false passport revealed his secret story.

He said that he had once dreamed of dying as an Islamist terrorist. He had handled guns and fired assault rifles in his youth.

Pressed about his line of work, he told border guards he had been operating as a spy.

And during that December, 2008, interrogation, the border guards heard his views on the previous month’s carnage in Mumbai.

“It’s stupid. It’s crazy,” he said, disagreeing with the terrorists’ tactics. “ … They should not kill people in the streets. They should do it at the border.”

Nearly 18 months later, this man – referred to only as Mr. XXXXX in court documents, owing to refugee-anonymity laws – is living in Canada despite being initially declared inadmissible.

He is one of only 30-odd people that Immigration Minister Jason Kenney declared “inadmissible” that year as national-security threats, Mr. Galloway being a more prominent example.
IRB decision. (ANI)

First World War sketches unveiled in Britain after 94 years

London, Apr 20(ANI): A series of previously unseen drawings of the First World War have been unveiled 94 years after they were deemed to be too sensitive for the British public.

The drawings by Sir Muirhead Bone were first published in newspapers to boost morale at home, and in a 1916 book entitled ‘The Western Front’.

However, they did not make it past the censor, who judged it as too demoralising in light of the need for new recruits.

Now, Sir Muirhead’s family has provided the images for a new edition of the book.

The sketches include a dying soldier, a crippled tank, and stretcher bearers carrying the wounded from battle.

Sir Muirhead was sent to France during the Battle of the Somme, where thousands of British Army personnel were slaughtered as they attempted to drive back the Germans.

The intelligence and propaganda chiefs, however, told him that his job was to record the war in a manner that would not dissuade young men from enlisting.

“It was more propaganda than recording the reality. It was all about presenting the right image to show our war effort was just, with one eye on recruiting more soldiers,”The Scotsman quoted Tim Barlass, publisher of The Western Front’s new version, as saying.

“He wasn’t to show the true horrors of war, the carnage, and for that reason many of the drawings he did never made it on to the pages of The Western Front. These unseen images show the reality,” he added. (ANI)

Modi describes SIT questioning as a difficult moment of his life

Gandhinagar, Mar 29 (ANI): Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi has described his marathon questioning by the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the 2002 Gujarat riots case as a difficult moment of his life.

On Saturday, the SIT questioned Modi for over nine hours, over a petition filled by former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri’s wife Zakia, which named him and 62 others as responsible for 2002 Gulbarg Society carnage.

In a post on his blog, narendramodi.com, Modi thanked the people of Gujarat for standing by him.

“I have cooperated with the process of law and accepted its supremacy. I heartily express my thankfulness to the people for their support and prayers in this difficult moment,” Modi wrote on his blog.

Modi stated that he tried to respect the law of the land and to respect the supremacy of law by appearing before the SIT.

“I have, in all humility, tried to respect the law of our great land and endeavored to respect the supremacy of the law by my behavior,” he said.

Earlier, the SIT chief R K Raghavan had described Modi’s questioning as a big step forward in seeking to deliver justice to 2002 Gujarat riots victims. (ANI)

I have replied to all questions of SIT: Narendra Modi

Ahmedabad, Mar 27 (ANI): Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday claimed that he has replied to all the queries raised by the Special Investigation Team (SIT).

Modi, who appeared before the Supreme Court appointed SIT this morning which questioned him for over five hours.

Interacting with media, after coming out of the SIT office in the old Secretariat Building, Modi said: “I have replied to all the questions asked by the SIT officials.”

Modi claimed that his appearance before the SIT was his answer to critics.

“I am abiding by the Indian Constitution. As I said earlier, no one is above the Indian Constitution, and today, my action has reiterated the same,” he said.

The SIT questioned Modi in connection with the Gulbarg Society carnage in

2002.

There had been reports that Modi”s interrogation would not take place inside the SIT office for security reasons and that he may be questioned at a place mutually agreed by him and the SIT.

The SIT says it would continue Modi’s questioning later this evening.

Confirming this, Modi said: “The questioning is not yet complete, I may come back around 9.30 p. m. Let SIT officials also do some home work.”

Modi said there are no officials of Gujarat origin in the SIT and added that it is expecting a fair outcome.

“There are no officials of Gujarat origin in the SIT, all officials are appointed as per the choice of Supreme Court,” he said.

It was reported that the SIT chief, R K Raghavan, was not present during the questioning. (ANI)

Gujarat riots: Modi says ready to appear before SIT panel

Ahmedabad, Mar 27 (ANI): Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi may appear before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) for interrogation on the 2002 Gujarat riots case on Saturday.

Sources said Modi has verbally responded to the SIT request by asserting that he is ready to appear provided a certain decorum is maintained by the investigators interrogating him on March 27.

There are reports that Modi”s interrogation may not take place inside the SIT office for security reasons and he may be questioned at a place mutually agreed by him and the SIT.

In a strong statement issued earlier after he was reported to have kept the panel waiting, Modi said: “It is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that Narendra Modi has been summoned by SIT on March 21.”

In his statement, Modi pointed out that March 21 happened to be “a Sunday and a public holiday.”

“The purveyors of lies did not even bother to check whether the SIT officers appointed by Supreme Court were present in Gujarat on March 21,” Modi said.

Modi alleged that the date March 21, was given out by “some vested interests and as part of the effort to interfere in the due process of law.”

Modi said in his statement that he would respond to the SIT, “Fully respecting the law and keeping in view the dignity of the body appointed by the Supreme Court.”
The SIT, which is headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director K R Raghavan, is looking into nine cases of the 2002 Gujarat riots.

The SIT has asked Modi to appear before it in connection with the Gulbarg Society carnage case.

Modi has been named as one of the 63 accused in the petition filed by Zakiya Jafri, the widow of the Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, who was killed by rioters in Gulbarg society of Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002.

In the case filed in the Supreme Court, Zakiya stated that Modi and 62 others had conspired during the riots, and that senior ministers had ordered bureaucrats and policemen not to respond to calls for help. Over a thousand people died in the Gujarat communal riots.

The Gujarat High Court has issued a notice to the Nanavati Commission asking it to explain, by April 1, whether it too would summon Narendra Modi as part of its inquiry into the 2002 riots. (ANI)

Modi may appear before SIT on March 27

Ahmedabad, Mar 24 (ANI): Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi may appear before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) for interrogation into the 2002 Gujarat riots case on March 27.

Sources said Modi has verbally responded to the SIT by asserting that he is ready to appear provided certain decorum is maintained by the investigators interrogating him on March 27.

There are reports that Modi”s interrogation may not take place inside the SIT office due to security reasons. He may be questioned at a place mutually agreed by him and the SIT.

Meanwhile, confusion prevailed on Monday as Modi said he was not summoned to appear before a Special Investigating Team (SIT) probing 2002 Gujarat riots cases on March 21.

On Monday evening Modi released an open letter defending his stand.

In a strong statement issued a day after he was reported as having kept the panel waiting for him to appear before it, Modi said: “It is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that Narendra Modi has been summoned by SIT on March 21.”

In the statement, Modi pointed out that March 21 happened to be “a Sunday and a public holiday.”

“The purveyors of lies did not even bother to check whether the SIT officers appointed by Supreme Court were present in Gujarat on March 21,” Modi said.

Modi alleged that the date March 21, was given out by “some vested interests and as part of the effort to interfere in the due process of law.”

Modi said in his statement that he would respond to the SIT, “Fully respecting the law and keeping in view the dignity of the body appointed by the Supreme Court.”

The SIT headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director K R Raghavan, is looking into nine cases of 2002 Gujarat riots.

The SIT had asked Modi to appear in connection with the Gulbarg Society carnage case.

The Gujarat High Court has issued a notice to the Nanavati Commission asking it to explain, by April 1, whether it too would summon Narendra Modi as part of its inquiry on the Gujarat riots of 2002. (ANI)

Modi to cooperate with SIT: Arun Jaitley

Ahemadabad, Mar 22 (ANI): Senior Bharatiya Janata leader Arun Jaitley on Monday said Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi will cooperate with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing Gulbarg carnage case of the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Interacting with the media here, Jaitely, who is also the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, said: “When Modi has to appear there (before the SIT) at designated time, he will. He will cooperate with the SIT.”

Commenting on why Modi didn’t appear before the SIT, Jaitley told reporters: “SIT didn’t fix March 21 for Modi’s appearance.”

“For the past few days, there has been incorrect information circulated in the media from some interested quarters about the date of SIT’s summon. It is an effort to create wrong impression to interfere in the process of law,” he added.

Earlier the day, Narendra Modi issued an open letter where he reasoned out that the SIT don’t summon anyone on Sundays and on public holidays.

“I will respond to the SIT fully respecting law and keeping in view the dignity of the body appointed by the Supreme Court. But it is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that Narendra Modi has been summoned by SIT (Special Investigation Team) on March 21,” read the statement. (ANI)

Narendra Modi denies he was summoned by SIT

Gandhinagar, Mar 22 (ANI): Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Monday said he was not summoned to appear before a Special Investigating Team (SIT) probing 2002 Gujarat riots cases on March 21.

On Monday evening Modi released an open letter defending his stand.

In a strong statement issued a day after he was reported as having kept the panel waiting for him to appear before it, Modi said: “It is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that Narendra Modi has been summoned by SIT on March 21.”

In the statement Modi pointed out that March 21 happened to be “a Sunday and a public holiday.”

“The purveyors of lies did not even bother to check whether the SIT officers appointed by Supreme Court were present in Gujarat on March 21,” Modi said.

Modi alleged that the date March 21, was given out by “some vested interests and as part of the effort to interfere in the due process of law.”

Modi said in his statement that he would respond to the SIT, “fully respecting law and keeping in view the dignity of the body appointed by the Supreme Court.”

The SIT headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director K R Raghavan, is looking into nine cases of 2002 Gujarat riots.

The SIT asked Modi to appear in connection with the Gulbarg Society carnage case.

Earlier in the day, the Gujarat High Court issued a notice to the Nanavati Commission asking it to explain, by April 1, whether it too would summon Narendra Modi as part of its inquiry on the Gujarat riots of 2002.(ANI)

Gujarat High Court asks Nanavati Commission to clarify on summoning Modi

Gandhinagar, Mar 22 (ANI): The Gujarat High Court on Monday asked Justice Nanavati Commission which is probing the 2002 post-Godhra riot cases, whether it would summon State Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The High Court issued the notice to Nanavati Commission through the state’s Advocate General to reply to the court in this regard by April 1.

The Court gave instructions while hearing a petition filed by the Jan Sangharsh Manch, which represents the victims of the 2002 riots.

In April 2007, the JSM had moved an application before the Nanavati Commission demanding that Modi be summoned for questioning, but the commission has not called Modi for questioning.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) summoned Modi for questioning in connection with the Gulburg Society carnage, but Modi failed to show up before the commission. (ANI)

Surf events called off after teenager’s death

Organisers of the national surf lifesaving titles on the Gold Coast have cancelled all water events for the remainder of the carnival after the death of a competitor yesterday.

Saxon Bird from the Queenscliff club in Sydney was competing in the ski leg of the under-19 ironman event when he disappeared into the rough surf.

He was pulled from the water an hour later but died in hospital.

Organisers say beach events will still go ahead.

Before Friday’s event some expressed concerns that the surf conditions were too dangerous, and it is alleged the teenager’s last words to his parents were, “I don’t want to do this.”

Saxon Bird was 150 metres from Kurrawa Beach when he was swept off his surf ski and disappeared into the choppy surf.

It is not clear if he lost control of his own surf ski or was knocked unconscious by another ski, but it took another hour before he was found more than 600 metres from where he was competing.

Ironwoman Hayley Bateup described the conditions as carnage, but says many competitors jumped in the water to join the search.

“Everyone’s in shock and it happened so close in the shore as well,” she said.

“It shows how dangerous our sport can be. Everyone got together and started swimming and if it wasn’t for that, he wouldn’t have been found.”

All competition was cancelled for the rest of the day.

Independent investigation

Surf Life Saving Australia chief executive Brett Williamson says the organisation has launched an independent investigation into the death and is cooperating with the police.

“We’ve asked all competitors and the broader surf lifesaving family to respect the feelings and the trauma that the family and our colleagues in surf lifesaving are going through at this time,” he said.

Competitors say the surf was like a washing machine as two-metre waves and a strong rip pushed people on top of each other.

Many struggled to avoid uncontrolled skis or boards which floated about in the surf.

The organisers are now being asked why the competition went ahead despite the rough conditions.

“Surf lifesavers operate in these sorts of conditions,” said Mr Williamson.

“The issue about the conditions and the competition will be taken in due course in the investigation.”

Cyclone Ului

The dangerous surf is being blamed on Cyclone Ului which is causing rough conditions along the Queensland coast.

Two competitors had been injured the previous day, treated for suspected spinal injuries.

Phoebe Hartin from the chemist across the road from the beach says many competitors had come in with minor cuts and bruising.

“We’ve seen a few broken bones, broken ribs, broken wrists, broken feet, lots of sprained ankles, lots of strained muscles and things like that,” she said.

“I’m really surprised that I haven’t seen more injuries considering the conditions here.”

The Bureau of Meteorology has forecast more strong winds and swells up to 3.6 metres over the weekend.

Jethmalani appeals Supreme Court to recall order on SIT probe

New Delhi, Mar 15 (ANI): Noted advocate Ram Jethmalani on Monday filed an application before the Supreme Court seeking recall of its directions ordering a probe by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) into the 2002 Gujarat riots incidents.

Jetmalani moved the plea while appearing on behalf of former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA, Kalu Marwari who was also summoned by the SIT along with Gujarat Chief Minister Narandra Modi for their alleged role during 2002 Gujarat riots.

Activists who are fighting for the 2002 Gujarat riots victims opined that it’s an attempt by Modi to legally question SIT’s intentions.

On Thursday, the SIT issued summons to Modi asking to depose before it on March 21.

The SIT led by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director R K Raghavan would question Modi on his alleged role in Gulbarg Society carnage where over 60 people were killed on February 28, 2002.

The summons to Modi is in connection to a petition submitted by Zakia Jaffrey, the widow of Ehsan Jaffrey, a former Congress Member of Parliament, who was murdered during the Gulberg Society riots.

The Gulberg case is totally separate from the nine other cases related to the Gujarat pogrom.

Zakia Jaffrey had filed a 100-page complaint alleging the involvement of Modi and 62 others. (ANI)

‘The evidence won’t beat us’: bushfire victim

“The floor’s dirt. The timber floor of the house was burnt. Everything in the house just totally burnt.”

That’s Wayne West’s assessment as he surveys what little he has left from bushfires seven years ago on Wyora Station, 90 kilometres west of Canberra in New South Wales.

Mr West is one of 127 plaintiffs involved in the ACT Supreme Court compensation hearing into the 2003 Canberra bushfires.

Prior to the fire destruction, Mr West grew investment pine trees, lucerne hay and fattened cattle in the protected and isolated valley that is watered by the Goodradigbee River.

The river was a renowned trout fishing mecca and home to numerous platypus and white-tailed water rats.

“The camp ovens … they were on the verandah at the time. They are oval now, we can’t use the cast iron camp ovens. So everything was just lost.”

At the time of the fires Mr West was a semi-retired part-time farmer.

Unlike many of the plaintiffs in the hearing, Wayne West was insured at the time of the blazes.

But on principle, he chose to pursue litigation.

Talking about the fire carnage still brings tears to Mr West’s eyes.

“What I saw on the 8th of January through to the 16th of January was a fire that burnt slowly,” he said.

“I didn’t witness anything of that fire that was dangerous. I walked to the fire. I walked in the fire.

“When I drove back to Canberra on Sunday the 19th the devastation in Canberra was unbelievable.”

Talking about these events is still hard for Mr West, who is visibly shaken reliving the trauma and raw emotions.

Day in court

Mr West has waited seven years to give evidence in a compensation hearing. Today he may get his chance in the ACT Supreme Court.

The aim of his case is to convince NSW fire and park authorities to change their approach to managing bushfires.

“Go and evaluate the situation of the fire when the fire starts. Not sit 30 and 40 kilometres away and make a judgment of a fire,” says Mr West.

“Or sit in front of a fire and look at a fire through a big black ball of smoke and say it is too dangerous.”

He says lessons still need to be learned from the inferno of 2003.

“If what happened in 2003, if things don’t change that will come back and bite a lot of people in this country.”

Mr West’s barrister Bernard Collaery will argue NSW authorities failed to contain the McIntyre’s hut fire in the neighbouring Brindabella National Park, NSW.

“They failed to make any effort to contain a fire with a direct attack to reduce the fire in its size,” said Mr West.

Mr West says he’s hoping to take his family on a holiday when the hearing concludes.

“I have always thought it is not the evidence that is the issue, it is the legal argument,” he said.

“The factual, legal technicalities will be the downfall if we do lose. But the evidence won’t beat us.”

He says he’s feeling quietly confident and hasn’t had time to feel nerves or contemplate losing.

“I went public, I was ridiculed by the authorities. We only wanted the truth to be told,” he said.

“I think I am vindicated now.”

Hearing resumes

The hearing resumes in the ACT Supreme Court this morning with the NSW Government’s senior defence counsel, John Maconachie QC, concluding his closing submissions.

There is expected to be a discussion between Chief Justice Terence Higgins, the plaintiffs’ lawyers and defence about whether evidence from the coronial inquiry into the 2003 Canberra bushfires by Maria Doogan will be admissible.

Lay evidence is expected to begin in the afternoon with plaintiff Wayne West of Wyora Station.

Lay evidence is expected to run for four weeks and will be followed by four weeks of expert evidence.

US Ambassador meets Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Update- US Ambassador)

New Delhi, Sept 18 (ANI): The United States Ambassador to India, Timothy J Roemer, today met Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh at his residence.

The meeting took place after Roemer met Union Home Minister P. hidambaram.

Speaking to reporters, after a meeting with Chidambaram, Roemer said bringing the culprits to justice and going after Saeed were important to both India and the United States.

“Swift and mighty punishment for the six Mumbai suspects in Islamabad, is important for United States and is important for India. And going after Saeed is very important and dismantling the infrastructure of LeT in that region is extremely important to the United States and to India,” said Roemer.

The meeting took after reports of two FIR’s against Saeed came late last night.

He has been charged under Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Act for making anti-state speeches where he urged activists of the Jamaat-ud-Dawa, the frontline organisation for LeT that he heads, to wage a ‘jehad’.

Saeed has also been charged for heading a charity collection drive during the Ramazan month according to the police.

Earlier, Roemer had called on Pakistan to take action against Saeed.

“There are five, probably six, suspects currently being held in Islamabad in connection with the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. It is extremely important that these six people be brought to justice and put behind bars and receive sentences commensurate with their crimes against India, US and the world,” a news channel quoted Roemer, as saying

“I hope that in future the action on 26/11 includes people like Hafiz Saeed. Recently he was put into an Interpol red flag list,” he added.

The remarks follows Chidambaram’s visit to US, where he had briefed several ministers under the Barack Obama administration about Islamabad’s inaction against perpetrators of the Mumbai carnage.

The attacks, which drew widespread condemnation across the world, began on 26 November 2008 and lasted until 29 November, killing at least 173 people and wounding at least 308. Among the dead were 28 foreign nationals from 10 countries.

Ajmal Amir Kasab, the only attacker who was captured alive, has disclosed that the attackers were members of LeT, which is considered a terrorist organization by the Government of India, the United States, and the United Kingdom, among others.

Interpol has also issued a Red Corner Notice against Saeed, and Zaki -ur- Rehman Lakhvi (another mastermind of the 26/11 attacks). The notice was issued after a Mumbai court issued non-bailable warrants against both terrorists. (ANI)