Obama: Republicans “out of touch” over bank reform

Wisconsin (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama launched a broad attack against Republican lawmakers on Wednesday, calling them out of touch with ordinary Americans for opposing Wall Street reform and siding with Big Oil.

Democrats on Capitol Hill are battling to send a landmark overhaul of U.S. financial regulation to Obama’s desk in the coming days to be signed into law.

Obama used a campaign-style speech in Wisconsin to defend his record on the economy and stress that he understands people are hurting under the weight of a U.S. jobless rate of 9.7 percent.

“We can return to the failed economic policies of the past, or we can keep building a stronger future. We can go backward, or we can keep moving forward.”

The president, whose Democratic Party faces potentially large losses in November 2 congressional elections, accused Republicans of leading the country into the recession and said they have opposed his policies aimed at fixing the economy.

And he singled out the Republican leader of the House of Representatives, John Boehner, for telling the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review that the financial regulation overhaul moving through Congress was so extensive that it “is like killing an ant with a nuclear weapon.”

“He can’t be that out of touch with the struggles of the American families,” Obama said of Boehner. “And if he is, he has to come here to Racine and ask people if they think the financial crisis was an ant,” Obama said, speaking two days before the release of closely-watched monthly jobs data.

Unemployment in Racine was 14.2 percent in May, well above the state-wide rate. At the national level, U.S. unemployment is forecast to edge up to 9.8 percent in June as the economy shed an expected 110,000 jobs, analysts polled by Reuters say.

JOBLESSNESS

Some Republicans key to the Wall Street measure becoming law are holding back support although they are expected to eventually approve the bill, which would set up a new consumer-protection bureau and force banks to reduce risky trades and investments.

Obama is seeking to marshal public anger over Wall Street, which many Americans blame for the 2008 financial crisis, to boost his reform agenda in an election year. In Racine, he also promoted his policies to lift the economy.

“The economy is headed in the right direction. But I know that for a lot of Americans — for Racine and many other communities — it’s not headed there fast enough,” he said.

Stubbornly high jobless levels are denting the president’s popularity and could sap his Democratic Party’s power on Capitol Hill in November mid-term congressional elections.

Republicans told Obama to concentrate on fixing the nation’s problems.

“The President should be focused on solving the problems of the American people — stopping the leaking oil and cleaning up the Gulf, scrapping his job-killing agenda, repealing and replacing ObamaCare — instead of my choice of metaphors,” Boehner said in a statement.

Republicans last week blocked a Democratic plan in the Senate to provide additional aid to jobless workers, businesses and cash-strapped states.

Obama said opposing the reform shows Republicans were siding with big banks and Big Oil.

“There are some folks in the other party who are also against raising the limit on what companies like BP have to pay for the environmental disasters they cause,” said Obama.

“The top Republican on the energy committee even had the nerve to apologize to BP for the fact that we made them set up this fund. Apologize to BP! He actually called the fund ‘a tragedy’,” Obama said.

(Writing by Alister Bull, editing by Philip Barbara)

India plays a critical role in Afghanistan: Cornyn

Praising New Delhi’s reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, a top US Senator on Thursday said India plays a critical role in Afghanistan where the United States has been fighting war against terrorism in the last eight years.

“As it stands, India plays an active and critical role in supporting the reconstruction effort in Afghanistan, having committed more than USD 1.2 billion to this cause,” top Republican Senator John Cornyn said in a statement.

The statement follows a meeting between Senator Cornyn and Indian Ambassador to the US Meera Shankar held at the Capitol Hill on April 19.

Cornyn is also the founder and co-chairman of the Senate India Caucus.

They discussed the current state of US-India bilateral relations and the importance of the two nations’ shared efforts regarding Afghanistan, the statement said.

Cornyn and Shankar also discussed trade policy and the US export control reform initiative, it added.

U.S. sees sanctions by May; Iran lobbies against West

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said on Thursday he expects new sanctions on Iran by May as Tehran began lobbying the U.N. Security Council to oppose new steps against the Islamic Republic over its atomic plans.

Biden issued the latest U.S. warning to Iran, locked in a standoff with the West over a nuclear program Tehran insists is entirely peaceful, in an appearance on ABC television’s “The View” talk show.

“Everyone from the Israeli prime minister straight through to the British prime minister to the president of Russia, everyone agrees the next step we should take is the U.N. sanction route,” Biden said.

“I believe you will see a sanction regime coming out by the end of this month, beginning of next month,” he said. Asked if Israel might attack Iran’s nuclear facilities without consulting Washington, Biden said Israel had agreed to wait and see what the impact of new U.N. sanctions would be.

As closed-door negotiations continue on a draft resolution for the U.N. Security Council, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki heads to Vienna and other capitals to lobby council members to oppose any new U.N. sanctions.

If negotiations on a fourth round of U.N. punitive measures against Tehran run past May, the U.S. House of Representatives has declared Congress should finalize legislation to impose new unilateral U.S. sanctions on Iran by the end of next month — whether or not the Security Council has acted.

The 403-11 vote signaled growing impatience on Capitol Hill with efforts by U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration and its allies to get a fourth round of U.N. sanctions to pressure Iran to curb a nuclear program the West fears is aimed at making a bomb.

Diplomats from the five permanent Security Council members — the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China — and Germany are meeting nearly every day in New York to revise a U.S.-drafted sanctions proposal that Moscow and Beijing would like to see watered down, Western diplomats say.

The proposed U.S. congressional measures are much tougher than those included in the U.N. draft proposal, agreed upon with Britain, France and Germany over a month ago before Washington passed it on to Russia and China for comment.

U.N. SANCTIONS TALKS COULD DRAG ON

The majority of U.S. lawmakers from both political parties are ready now to block Iran’s vital gasoline imports by imposing sanctions on its gasoline suppliers, a tough measure also favored by Israel. Both the House and the Senate passed legislation months ago to do this.

The U.S. draft for the 15-nation Security Council proposes some new curbs on Iranian banking, a full arms embargo, tougher measures against Iranian shipping, moves against members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and firms they control and a ban on new investments in Iran’s energy sector.

But the U.N. draft does not seek to block imports or exports of oil or gas products to or from Iran — measures that Russia and China have made clear they could not support.

Western diplomats familiar with the U.N. talks say the six powers are far from agreement on a draft to present to the full council and expect negotiations to drag on until June.

Diplomats said China proposed cutting some of the measures from the U.S. draft. Both Russia and energy-hungry China have close trade ties with Iran and fought hard to dilute three previous rounds of U.N. sanctions before voting for them.

The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, Ali Akbar Salehi, told Reuters in Tehran that Foreign Minister Mottaki would soon “meet and discuss with representatives of (council) member countries” the sanctions issue. Diplomats said Tehran was launching a lobbying campaign to avoid new sanctions.

Mottaki’s first stop will be Austria, which is on the council until the end of this year and also the seat of the U.N. nuclear watchdog. He is expected to meet with senior Austrian officials on Sunday, as well as the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Yukiya Amano.

Mottaki met with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu earlier this week in Tehran. Davutoglu told reporters his country, which is also on the Security Council and has made clear it would have trouble supporting new sanctions on Iran, was ready to help resolve Tehran’s standoff with the West.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was in Harare for talks with Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe, a visit Mugabe’s opponents condemned as a meeting of despots.

Zimbabwean state media said Ahmadinejad’s visit was part of a drive to boost ties between nations at odds with the West.

The U.S. unilateral measures under discussion in Congress could make life difficult for countries trading with Iran.

A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that 41 foreign firms had commercial activity in Iran’s oil, natural gas and petrochemical sectors from 2005 to 2009.

Separately, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards successfully deployed a new speed boat on Thursday that is capable of destroying enemy ships in war games in a waterway crucial for global oil supplies, Iranian media reported.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell in Washington, Louis Charbonneau in New York, Sylvia Westall in Vienna, Parisa Hafezi in Tehran, Marius Bosch in Harare; writing by Louis Charbonneau; editing by Todd Eastham)

U.S. ‘optimistic’ on Japan base decision – military

A top U.S. military commander said on Wednesday he was optimistic Japan would soon agree to the planned relocation of a U.S airbase, a dispute that has strained U.S.-Japan ties.

Admiral Robert Willard, head of U.S. Pacific Command, told lawmakers he believed Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama would stick to a 2006 accord that included shifting the Marines’ Futenma airbase to a less crowded spot on Japan’s Okinawa island.

“We are optimistic that the government of Japan will fully reaffirm the 2006 (government of Japan)-U.S. agreement by May 2010,” Willard said in testimony on Capitol Hill.

During the campaign that swept his party to power last year, Hatoyama raised hopes Futenma could be moved off the southern island, host to the bulk of America’s 47,000 military personnel.

But there is still no sign of a feasible alternative ahead of Hatoyama’s self-imposed May deadline to resolve the matter.

Willard also said he thought the Japanese government understood the time pressure and would stick to the timetable.

“There is a level of urgency in getting Futenma resolved,” Willard told reporters after a congressional hearing on military construction in the Pacific command. Moving the base elsewhere on Okinawa is a critical element of the Pentagon’s plan to relocate of 8,000 Marines to Guam, Willard said.

“We’re very anxious to hear what the government (of Japan) thinks.”

A poll published in the Sankei newspaper on Tuesday showed nearly half of those who responded said Hatoyama should quit if he fails to resolve the airbase row.

More than 73 percent of voters polled by the Sankei said they were unhappy with his management of the problem, while nearly 85 percent of respondents said they were unimpressed with Hatoyama’s leadership skills overall.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell, Editing by Stacey Joyce)

Women lawmakers outperform male counterparts, says study

Washington, Sep.16 (ANI): A study conducted by Stanford University and the University of Chicago reaerchers has concluded that women lawmakers in Congress introduce more bills, attract more co-sponsors and bring home more money for their districts than their male counterparts do.

The study, accessed by Politico, examined the performance of House members between 1984 and 2004, and found that women delivered roughly nine percent more discretionary spending for their districts than men.

While there are obviously variables beyond gender – seniority, party affiliation, majority/minority status and the differing priorities of a freshman and a veteran lawmaker – the researchers say they’ve accounted for those in making their male-to-female comparisons.

The researchers also found that women introduced more legislation than men who served in their same districts, often hitting the ground running in their first terms.

“We find that, on average, women sponsor about three bills more per Congress per term than their male counterparts. They co-sponsor more bills than other members, and they also obtain more co-sponsors for their own bills,” said one of the researchers.

Since 1789, women have constituted just two percent of the total congressional population. The ratio of female to male representatives has increased in recent years, but the pace is still fairly glacial: Nearly 17 percent of House members are women today, compared with about 3 percent in 1979.

Researchers say the small number of female members may have something to do with their effectiveness. Women who run and win are likely the most politically ambitious and talented of their pool, having potentially overcome hurdles including voter bias and self-doubt about their ability to win.

Female candidates also tend to attract more challengers. Politically eligible women tend to doubt their ability to get elected and raise money more than men do, multiple studies have indicated.

Once women get to Capitol Hill, those hurdles may drive them to perform better, on average, than male counterparts who have faced a less contentious road. (ANI)

50,000 American Muslims to attend prayer meeting on Washington Mall on Sep.25

Washington, Sep.13 (ANI): At least 50,000 American Muslims will participate in a national prayer gathering for September 25 in Washington, D.C.

According to a report filed by The Star-Ledger, the gathering is taking place in the city’s National Mall area and is being organised by representatives of a mosque in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

The paper quoted Hassen Abdellah, president of the Dar-ul-Islam mosque and an event organizer, as saying: “Most of the time, when Muslims go to Washington, D.C., they go there to protest some type of event…This is not a protest. Never has the Islamic community prayed on Capitol Hill for the soul of America. We’re Americans. We need to change the face of Islam so people don’t feel every Muslim believes America is ‘the great Satan,’ because we love America.”

The Star-Ledger reports that “A permit from the Capitol Hill police, granted July 28, allows access to the area by the West Front of the Capitol building from 4 a.m. to 7 p.m. on September 25, but the main gathering will occur at 1 p.m., for the Friday prayer service.

Abdellah said he expects 50,000 people to attend, from mosques around the country, though non-Muslims are welcome, too.”

Abdellah stated the idea germinated after President Obama’s inaugural speech, and was reinforced by this summer’s Cairo address: “For the first time in my lifetime,”

Abdellah said, “I heard someone of his stature speaking about Islam and Muslims not in an adversarial sense, but in the sense of being welcome and acknowledging we are integral citizens in the society-that we’re gainfully employed, we’re educated.”(ANI)

Obama’s health care reform less popular than Bill Clinton’s ’94 proposal

Washington, Aug. 28 (ANI): Americans are more sceptical about President Barack Obama’s health care reform than they were about Bill Clinton’s health care proposals in 1994, a survey conducted by a Republican polling firm has found.

Thirty seven percent of Americans are opposed to the Obama plan compared with 25 percent who favor it, a poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies shows.

In June of 1994 – just a few months before a White House-led health care reform push effectively died on Capitol Hill – 35 percent of Americans said they opposed the Clinton administration’s plan while 23 percent favored it, Politico cited a survey conducted by the same firm, as saying.

But in 1994 as well as now, the polls showed that large numbers of Americans remain undecided about health care reform.

At that time, 42 percent of those surveyed said they had no opinion about Clinton’s plan and this August, 37 percent also had no opinion about Obama’s proposal.

The recent Public Opinion Strategies Poll surveyed 800 registered voters Aug. 11-13 and has a 3.5 percentage point margin of error.

The poll asked about Obama’s plan, but in reality, there are several versions of health care reform currently working their way through Congress.

Bill McInturff, a partner at the firm who poll-tested the “Harry and Louise” advertising campaign that played a key role in the defeat of the Clinton administration’s health care reform efforts in the 1990s, said that opposition to the Obama plan has been fuelled, in part, by the notion that “government has gotten way too big and is going way too far.”

McInturff also predicted that the death of Senator Ted Kennedy would not have much of a practical impact on the health care debate.

“Individual members will make those votes based on their own calculus, for their own situation and not as a memorial to his long and distinguished career,” McInturff said. (ANI)

Pak minister asks US not to attach strings with economic aid

Washington, July 8 (ANI): Pakistan’s Parliamentary Affairs Minister Babar Awan has asked Washington not to attach conditions with the US aid to Pakistan, as the country requires string-less assistance to fight the global war on terror.

“This is not the time for attaching conditions to assistance. We are fighting not only for Pakistan, but for global peace,” the Daily Times quoted Awan, as saying.

Awan’s remarks come in the backdrop of recent proposals on Capitol Hill conditioning future US assistance for Pakistan.

Both the US House of Representatives and the Senate had passed their respective legislative measures to triple economic assistance for Pakistan to 1.5 billion dollars annually.

Lawmakers from the two chambers are expected to reconcile their versions in order to send a final version to President Barack Obama for endorsement.

Awan welcomed the desire to help Pakistan but argued the aid should be utilised by the democratic government – which includes all major political parties in the ruling coalition – and it should not be administered through non-governmental organisations.

He urged Pakistan’s critics to understand that the country was being run by an elected government, which was committed to utilise foreign aid transparently for the benefit of the people. (ANI)

Pakistan rapidly expanding its nuclear capability: US

Washington, May 18 (ANI): Amid political turbulence in Pakistan, and heightened fears about the Taliban and other extremist groups seizing the country’s nuclear assets, there has been a rapid expansion of Islamabad’s nuclear armaments.

US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, in a confidential briefing, told members of Congress that there are certain reports which confirm that Islamabad is rapidly adding to its nuclear arsenal.

When enquired whether he had seen evidence of an increase in the size of the Pakistani nuclear arsenal, Admiral Mullen just said: “Yes”.

This certainly raises questions over the proposed billions of dollars of US military assistance to Pakistan that might be sidetracked to expand its nuclear capability rather than utilizing it to counter insurgency.

Officials of the Obama administration have said that they had communicated to Congress that their intent was to assure that military aid to Pakistan was directed toward counterterrorism and not diverted, The New York Times reports.

Now, that Washington has ‘officially’ admitted that Pakistan is expanding its nuclear activities, it still remains to be seen whether it would reduce or delay the aid to Islamabad promised earlier.

The US Congress is considering proposals to spend 3 billion dollars over the next five years to train and equip Pakistan’s military for counterinsurgency warfare. This is in addition to 7.5 billion dollars that the Capitol Hill has promised in civilian assistance.

However, the United States still does not have any detail about the dimensions of Pakistan’s nuclear expansion programmes.

“We see them scaling up their centrifuge facilities,” President of the Institute for Science and International Security, David Albright said.

Albright blamed the previous US regime for the problem which might aggravate the already tense situation of South-Asia.

“The Bush administration turned a blind eye to how this is being ramped up.And of course, with enough pressure, all this could be preventable,” he said.

Senators were of the view that unless Pakistan commit to fight and eliminate insurgents completely, and pursue its objectives sincerely, the hefty aid being offered would serve no purpose.

“Unless Pakistan’s leaders commit, in deeds and words, their country’s armed forces and security personnel to eliminating the threat from militant extremists, and unless they make it clear that they are doing so, for the sake of their own future, then no amount of assistance will be effective,” Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin said.(ANI)

Official Washington prefer more-breezy, fly-in, fly-out casual partying events

Washington, Apr.30 (ANI): Socialising and partying in official Washington has undergone a change in the last decade and a half.

Washington doesn’t demand or even want a sit-down dinner with an evening port.

According to Politico, partygoers tend to prefer more-breezy, fly-in, fly-out casual events, like birthday parties for A-list reporters and staffers.

Faced with the most terrifying economic crisis since the Great Depression, two wars, the looming collapse of the auto industry, a swine flu epidemic and even a few pirate attacks, the city’s new establishment hasn’t had the time – or perhaps the inclination – to elect a new power hostess.

“The first 100 days, the economy wasn’t solved and the new hostess hasn’t been identified,” says journalist Margaret Carlson, who has a knack for bringing people together.

Its essentially par for the course that every incoming administration reshuffles the Washington deck – effectively determining who’s powerful and who’s not. But as any decent lobbyist will tell you, access is the key to power, and few control the access to the city’s political hierarchy more directly than the reigning social chair.

The doyennes of yesteryear — Democratic powerhouse Esther Coopersmith, the well-known Sally Quinn, and Beth Dozoretz, a friend of the Clintons, remain social fixtures. These women still host fabulous parties.

Several years ago, two new party players – Juleanna Glover and Nancy Jacobson Penn – popped up on the horizon, offering food, drink and expansive homes for White House officials, members of Congress, senators, Capitol Hill staff, lobbyists, reporters and even then-Vice President Dick Cheney.

Glover, a Republican, was more than willing to throw a party for anyone from the newly minted head of CNN’s Washington bureau to visiting A-listers such as businessman John Tisch.

Jacobson Penn, conveniently a Democrat, used her impressive Rolodex to transform her palatial Georgetown home into a sort of social foxhole for Democrats in a town that was run by Republicans.

Between them, Glover and Jacobson Penn had the social cartography of political Washington covered.

Still, the grandeur of a Katharine Graham soiree is missing – the utter sophistication and French chefs replaced by appetizers from Costco.

So who’s in line for the new throne?

Communications guru, avid party-thrower and overall Washington political scene expert Jim Courtovich says that “the list is still emerging.” (ANI)

US to ensure increased aid is used to uplift Pakistanis

Washington, Mar 29 (ANI): The United States fully supports the elected leadership of Pakistan and will work with them closely to ensure that the enhanced American assistance is used toward socio-economic uplift of the people as part of efforts to deal with violent extremism afflicting the country.

US official Bruce Riedel, chair and lead author of the panel that crafted the policy for the Obama Administration’s way forward in the Pakistan-Afghanistan region, called for proceeding cautiously on putting any overly-legislative or other restrictions on aid for Pakistan.
We support the elected leadership of Pakistan as the US president indicated in his speech, we’re going to make sure that there is rigorous oversight (of aid) by an inspector general’s office.

“And we’re going to work very, very intensively with our Pakistani partners, the democratically elected civilian leadership in Pakistan, to see that we are moving in the right direction, in the same direction that we want to go,” the Daily Times quoted Riedel, as saying.

Riedel said that any moves towards strict restrictions should not push Washington into a corner, as has been the case in the past when US legislative conditions on Pakistani aid backfired.

“The United States has a long history of legislative-required sanctions on Pakistan. I think one of the things that we have learned from that history is that we need to be very careful in how we do this, and that we need to work with the Pakistanis and not box ourselves in or box them in.

“So it’s going to be a complex process. We will work very closely with the [Capitol] Hill on the legislation,” he said.

Meanwhile, US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Richard Boucher has confirmed that the actual American assistance for Pakistan will be higher than 1.5 billion dollars to be mandated under Kerry-Lugar legislation, and in addition, there would be a substantial increase in military aid.(ANI)

New US strategy would focus on reconciliation with militants in Pak, Afghanistan

Washington, Mar. 14 (ANI): The new United States strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan would revolve around reconciliation with militants operating in tribal areas, because the US regards that at least seventy per cent insurgents in the region are reconcilable.

Dawn sources claimed that the Commander of US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, General David Petraeus and special envoy Richard Holbrooke, met on Friday at Capitol Hill, and spent two hours explaining salient features of the new strategy to lawmakers.

The duo is also believed to have informed them about the efforts made by the US to disengage collision between the Pakistan Government and the opposition.

The new strategy, expected to be make public next week, reflects a conclusion by the review team, that a vast majority of insurgents can be persuaded to quit insurgency if provided with proper incentives.

Pakistan, which is already negotiating deals with militants in Swat, would be encouraged further to expand its peace efforts.

However, the drone attacks inside Pakistan territory will continue to play a key role in the new strategy as well.

The members of the review team, including senior policy makers, think-tank experts and intelligence officials, concluded that the US military has successfully driven out hardcore Taliban and al-Qaeda activists from Afghanistan to FATA. Now they can be flushed out using drones.

The sources said that the Zardari Government also supports this strategy.The new plan is expected to offer more economic and military aid to Pakistan. (ANI)

US concerned over Netanyahu heading right-wing Israeli government

Jerusalem, Feb 12 (ANI): US officials are publicly taking a wait-and-watch approach to the formation of a new Israeli Government, but privately have expressed concern over Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu heading a right-wing coalition.

There would be great unease at the prospect of such a government; the Jerusalem Post quoted one Capitol Hill source, as saying.

He predicted that a governing coalition of parties from the Right could embolden the Left flank of the democratic party and turn up pressure, particularly in the US Congress, to pass measures that made clear demands on Israel.

He distinguished, however, between a Netanyahu-led right-wing coalition and Netanyahu-led national unity government.

The source noted that Netanyahu had made a strong effort to reach out to the Obama Administration and made the case to the US and the Israeli public that he could work with the White House.

He said that attitude could help assuage US concerns when presented in a national-unity package, whose positions – whether under Netanyahu or Livni – would be more in line with the US’s own policies of engagement on Arab-Israeli reconciliation.

“The hope is that there is a government that is really committed to peace with the Palestinians,” The Washington Post quoted one senior administration official saying.

Even if Netanyahu prevails, the official added, “he’s grown over the years. Getting back to the talks with the Palestinians is really the only solution.”

Ron Dermer, a senior adviser to Netanyahu, said Wednesday that the Likud leader strongly preferred to put together a national-unity government that looked toward the center of the country’s political spectrum rather than a right-wing coalition. (ANI)

Obamas’ seek to bring ‘Camelot’ back to the White House

Washington, Feb.11 (ANI): President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are unleashing a bipartisan charm offensive and exploiting every square inch of their new home to make friends and influence rivals.

According to Politico, since moving into their new digs, the first couple has hosted a half-dozen gatherings – from bipartisan cocktail receptions to a public open house to the more intimate Super Bowl party two Sundays ago – ending many of their days past midnight.

Most recently, on Wednesday, the Obamas opened the White House doors to House caucus leaders from the moderate Blue Dog Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus.

White House aides say the couple hopes to make the Wednesday cocktail parties a tradition.

Friends say the Obamas are looking to maintain the dizzying social calendar they had in their pre-White House days, while using their knack for socializing to find new friends and win hearts on Capitol Hill and in other Washington power centers.

“They want to replicate the same kind of environment they had in Chicago,” said a longtime friend of the Obamas, adding that White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers is “the perfect person” for the job because she knows the couple’s former life inside out and is “designing the calendar to reflect the kinds of things they like to do.”

“If there was a party or an event [in Chicago], they were there. They’ve always liked to go to lots of restaurants and be a part of the community. Now, they want to be a part of D.C. Barack and Michelle have always been interested in the details of people’s lives,” the confidant said, calling them “people people,” a friend of theirs said.

“They know who’s engaged to whom, what people’s spouses do for a living, all about their parents, where they grew up, names of children,” the friend said further.

The president, the friend added, “likes to be in the know.”

Senator Claire McCaskill, one of the president’s closest friends in the Senate and a guest at a recent White House party, said Obama likes a mixed crowd because he “knows if he’s around people like that, he won’t get everything sugarcoated. He wants to make sure he stays grounded and wants to hear the good, the bad and the ugly.”

At the bipartisan Super Bowl blast, the Obamas kept it casual, serving up hot dogs, pizza, and vanilla and chocolate ice cream, with no mention of politics, guests said.

Conversations centered on football, basketball and day-to-day life.

At the start of the affair, the first couple worked their way around the East Wing, where guests initially gathered. Then, just before the start of the game, Obama shouted, “Kickoff!” and pointed revelers toward the White House theater.

During the game, guests said he groaned at bad plays and threw his hands up in the air when the Steelers – the team he was rooting for – scored.

The couple’s social calendar is markedly different from that of other recent inhabitants at 1600. The Bushes 43 often were in bed by 9 p.m. and kept a tame social life, gravitating toward old pals from Texas and a tight circle of Washington friends.

Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton also kept lighter social schedules.

Dee Dee Myers, former White House press secretary to Clinton, said he and Hillary “were not as social as the Obamas appear to be.”

“We haven’t seen this kind of entertaining in a really long time,” she said. (ANI)

‘Obama is the biggest ever assassination target in American history’

London, Jan 20 (ANI): Barack Obama, who will become the 44th President of the US today, is the biggest ever assassination target in American history.

According to the Daily Star, the 47-year-old has taken the responsibility of doing the most important job in the world, which is to save the global economy from meltdown, but it is also the most dangerous.

He will enter the White House as the first black president knowing that white supremacists have vowed to kill him.

And therefore, security-surrounding Obama has been stepped up.

CIA chiefs are throwing a ring of steel around his inauguration to make sure he does not meet the same fate as assassinated 1960s president John F Kennedy.

They have turned Washington DC into an impenetrable fortress for the historic ceremony. It will be guarded by 45,000 soldiers, police, secret agents and National Guards.

Jet fighters will also be on standby for the ceremony.

Obama will be protected behind bullet-proof glass and ride in a bomb-proof limo with the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and al-Qaida all gunning for him.

US military leaders have tried to cater for every possible type of terror strike from a gunman to a chemical attack.

Intelligence chiefs, who have reported a huge increase in threats running up to inauguration day, have placed snipers on every rooftop around Washing-ton’s Lincoln Memorial and Capitol Hill, where Obama will deliver his first speech as US head of state.

Leaders of the racist KKK have issued a call for members to wear black armbands and fly the US flag upside down in protest at him taking office.

And FBI assistant director Joe Persichini confirmed the white supremacy movement is itching to take out Obama.

“We have seen a lot of chatter. We have seen a lot of discussions and we have seen some information via the Internet,” Persichini said. (ANI)

Ninja skills a must to prevent Obama Inauguration ticket theft!

Washington, January 13 (ANI): Knowing martial arts may be the best way to prevent thugs from laying their hands on US President-elect Barack Obama’s Inauguration tickets.

Capitol Hill, a metonym for the United States Congress, was said to have been flooded with calls for the tickets almost as soon Obama won the election in November.

And now, with the 10 official inauguration balls beginning on January 18, the tickets were selling “like crack cocaine”, potentially bearing a similar street value, according to a Congressional aide.

While one staffer claimed that she needed “Secret Service protection” to deliver the tickets, another aide alleged “knowing martial arts” would help her scare away thugs.

“They trust me to be my own body guard, I guess,” Fox News quoted the aide as saying.

Another Capitol worker added: “These are the most desired things in Washington.” (ANI)