Senator calls Nikki, Obama ‘ragheads’

Nikki Haley, the Indian American woman running for South Carolina’s Governor seat, was attacked with racial slur by a state lawmaker who called her a “raghead”.

Republican state Senator Jake Knotts also attacked US President Barack Obama in comments on an Internet political show called Pub Politics.

Haley, who was born a Sikh and describes herself as a Methodist, became target of racial slur typically used against ethnic groups that wear turbans or headdresses.

“We already got one raghead in the White House,” Knotts said. “We don’t need another in the Governor’s Mansion,” he was quoted as saying by The State newspaper. Knotts reportedly also talked at length about Haley’s parents, religion and family.

Haley campaign manager Tim Pearson said Knotts was an embarrassment to the state, and that South Carolina voters would make it clear on Tuesday they are better than this.

Knotts now insists that his comments were made in zest and also agreed to apologise.

“My ‘raghead’ comments about Obama and Haley were intended in jest,” he said. “Bear in mind that this is a freewheeling, anything-goes Internet radio show that is broadcast from a pub. It’s like local political version of Saturday Night Live,” he said in a statement.

Since my intended humorous context was lost in translation, I apologise. I still believe Haley is pretending to be someone she is not, much as Obama did, but I apologise to both for an unintended slur,” the Republican politician added.

McCain, Hayworth Bicker Over Meaning of ‘Oscar’ Attack Ad

A campaign attack ad that depicts Sen. John McCain as an “Avatar” has the Arizona Republican crying foul over what he sees as a slap to Native Americans. But his primary opponent, J.D. Hayworth, may well be wondering what planet he’s on.

This much we know for sure: J.D. Hayworth thinks John McCain is not really, truly a conservative. He makes that clear in an online campaign ad that depicts the Arizona senator as “Nominee for Best Conservative Actor.”

The ad (click here to view it), clearly an Academy Awards sendoff, portrays McCain bursting out of a gold Hollywood star, with a statuette and an envelope …

And blue warpaint splashed across his face.

That’s the part that has riled McCain, who is accusing his Republican primary opponent of insulting Native Americans.

But it’s also the part that may have Hayworth wondering what planet McCain is on — since the ad appears to be a sendoff of the blockbuster film Avatar, in which case the blue warpaint is a reference to the fictional, blue-skinned Na’vi people on the distant world of Pandora.

Regardless, McCain is demanding that Hayworth apologize.

“Ex-Congressman J.D. Hayworth should immediately apologize and take down his latest online ad, which is an outrageous offense to John McCain’s lifetime of honorable service to our state and nation, and insulting to Native Americans here in Arizona and across America,” McCain campaign manager Shiree Verdone said Thursday in a written statement.

“Mr. Hayworth is welcome to debate the challenges facing our state and nation, but this kind of character assassination has no place in the Republican Party, and Mr. Hayworth should be ashamed of his campaign for running it,” she wrote.

The Hayworth campaign refused to apologize; it said the ad will remain up and, in fact, it expects that the controversy will increase its visibility.

“We would encourage him to get a sense of humor,” Hayworth campaign spokesman Jason Rose told FoxNews.com. “And the reality is John McCain has been attacking J.D. Hayworth viciously for three straight months and if he can’t take a joke, or take the heat, it might be time for him to get out of the Senate.”

Rose said he thought the ad was nicely timed with the Academy Awards to convey a core message of Hayworth’s campaign.

“And that is every six years McCain promises to be a conservative, and then after he’s elected he goes back to poking Republicans in the eye,” he said, noting McCain’s moderate positions on immigration reform and climate change.

Rose said he didn’t understand the link the McCain campaign made between the ad and Native Americans.

“This shows you how insulated he is,” he said, suggesting that McCain has not seen the record-grossing film.

The McCain campaign did not return a message seeking comment.

A spokesman for a Native American tribe said McCain’s criticism seemed to miss the mark.

“This whole thing is a joke,” said Tony Phillippe, the public administrator for the Kaibab-Pauite Tribe, who burst into laughter when told about the ad.

“People do anything to get their points across. It’s funny,” he said, adding that he’s not offended. “I think the whole concept is ludicrous.”

Phillippe noted that he’s white with no Native American blood.

But the president of the Navajo Nation, part of the largest tribe in the U.S., said despite his Master’s degree, he can’t figure out what Hayworth is trying to say, according to a Nation spokesman who spoke with FoxNews.com after the ad was e-mailed to the tribe.

“Several staff assistants in the president’s office (who are Navajo) took a look and agreed that, at best, whatever message is trying to be conveyed is muddled and, at worst, some native people will find it offensive,” spokesman George Hardeen said in an e-mail message.

“No other ethnic group is so frequently publically maligned in this very fashion, and here we have a candidate for U.S. Senate succumbing to the temptation of using images of race to bait an opponent,” he said.

Hardeen noted that McCain has been an active supporter of Native American issues and has typically been endorsed by all Arizona tribes when seeking re-election.

“I’m certain he’ll get Navajo support again in November,” he said, adding that the ad “may very well change some minds against Mr. Hayworth.”

How Royals blew Brit taxpayers’ money

London, Jun 30 (ANI): Brit taxpayers had to dole out 250,000 pounds for a makeover of Princess Beatrice’s university digs, stated a bill revealed by the Queen on June 29.

The fund was used to redecorate a private four-bed apartment at St James’s Palace for Beatrice, 20, who started her history of art degree at Goldsmiths University, London, last September.

The annual report into Royal finances revealed the money was spent on rewiring the rooms, plus installing a new kitchen, two new bathrooms and a wood floor in two reception rooms.

Graham Smith, from the campaign group Republic, has branded the huge cost a “scandal”.

“This puts the rows about MPs’ expenses and duck houses in perspective. This bill eclipses any put in by MPs in their expenses,” the Sun quoted him as saying.

“The level of scrutiny being given to MPs expenses should apply to Royal spending,” he said.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance has also condemned the St James Palace expenditure.

“It’s staggering,” campaign manager Susie Squire said.

“Many taxpayers will find this unjustifiable, not least because Beatrice does not carry out official engagements,” she stated.

But a senior Royal aide has defended the 256,000-pound bill, saying the age of the property meant high restoration costs.

“The apartment had been used by a member of household staff,” he said.

“It’s a normal apartment which was on our list for improvements for some time.

“It co-coincided with the Princess going to university in London and it was therefore appropriate for her to occupy it,” he added. (ANI)

20pct recession-hit Brits planning sunbed holiday

London, May 11 (ANI): The ongoing recession has forced British people to give up sunny holidays and spend more time under tanning lamps, according to a poll.

Almost a third of people surveyed by YouGov have revealed that they were less likely to go on a sunny summer holiday, and almost 19 pct sunbed users plan to spend more time under tanning lamps.

The charity, which runs an annual SunSmart campaign, has warned of the lifetime skin damage caused by sunbeds.

SunSmart campaign manager Katy Scammell said that the intensity of some UV rays from sunbeds could be up to 15 times higher than that of the midday sun.

Moreover, using a sunbed more than once a month or more could increase the risk of skin cancer by more than half.

“Exposure to these rays increases your risk of melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer,” the Daily Express quoted Scammell as saying.

“Not only do the harmful rays increase your risk of skin cancer, but they also lead to premature ageing and the appearance of lines, wrinkles and coarse, leathery skin,” she added. (ANI)

Sex email costs Brit taxpayers more than £14k!

London, May 2 (ANI): After a joke email about Viagra was circulated with an explicit picture attached to it, it cost taxpayers in a seaside town more than 14,000 pounds.

Bournemouth Council is said to have spent 14,100.17 pounds paying 15 employees to stay at home, after the Viagra email, as council chiefs checked some of the staff’s email accounts.

Messages that were found from the inboxes were deemed to be pornographic or racist.

The emails were those of social workers, occupational therapists and secretarial staff, and they were among those kept off for a week or two weeks from late February to early March, with one employee kept at home for 16 days.

When they were allowed back to work, they faced disciplinary hearings, management advice and guidance.

“These council employees have behaved in a manner that is wholly inappropriate,” the Sun quoted Susie Squire, campaign manager for the TaxPayers’ Alliance, as saying.

“It’s absolutely right to discipline them but there’s no reason it should have cost taxpayers quite so much.

“It seems like a very long time to clear up quite a straightforward case,” she added.

The cost came to light following a freedom of information request. (ANI)

Women under 30s warned against cancer caused by ‘Binge Tanning’

London, Apr 8 (ANI): “Binge tanning” and excessive sunbed use have made melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, the most common disease for women in their 20s, cautioned a charity.

A survey of 4,000 people carried out last year has revealed that 340 women in their 20s are annually diagnosed with malignant melanoma, indicating a rate of almost one a day.

The above figure is almost double the number found to have breast cancer in the same age bracket.

The survey also found that one in three women has used a sunbed at some point, and a big 80 percent of them first used one before the age of 35 years.

“Spending time on sunbeds is just as dangerous as staying out too long in sun,” Sky News quoted Caroline Cerny, campaign manager for Cancer Research UK’s SunSmart campaign, as saying.

“Sunbeds don’t offer a safe way to tan. The intensity of UV rays in some sunbeds can be more than 10 times stronger than the midday sun.

“Excessive exposure to UV damages the DNA in skin cells which increases the risk of skin cancer and makes skin age faster.

“But, importantly, if people take care not to burn in the sun and don’t use sunbeds, the majority of malignant melanoma could be prevented,” she added. (ANI)