Soon, clinical treatment for cocaine toxicity

Washington, April 27 (ANI): A new American research promises an advanced and effective therapy for cocaine toxicity.

Scientists have developed and tested a modified enzyme that can break down cocaine into inactive products nearly 1,000 times faster than the human body does regularly.

This engineered enzyme, called CocE, may be an excellent candidate for clinical use.

The difficulty in designing a therapy for cocaine toxicity stems from the drug”s complex mechanism of action.

Cocaine can block multiple targets in the brain and body, which accounts for this drug”s cardiovascular and anesthetic effects, as well as its strong addictive properties.

Moreover, many of the metabolites of cocaine formed by the body (such as norcocaine and cocaethylene) have similar and sometimes stronger effects than cocaine itself.

Due to the myriad of action sites that would need to be blocked to eliminate the toxic physiological effects of cocaine and its by-products, the best strategy to treating toxicity from overdose is to directly eliminate the drug.

Remy L. Brim and colleagues at the University of Michigan, in collaboration with Columbia University and the University of Kentucky, have been researching the potential of cocaine esterase (CocE) to block cocaine toxicity by eliminating cocaine.

CocE is an enzyme originally isolated from a soil bacterium found around the roots of the coca plant, that can break down cocaine into the same metabolites as the natural human enzyme butyrylcholinesterase, only much more rapidly.

CocE, however, is naturally unstable at the normal body temperature.

To enhance the thermal stability of the enzyme, the investigators used a series of biochemical and computational approaches to modify the enzyme.

The thermally stable CocE was found to effectively degrade cocaine and two of cocaine”s active metabolites, norcocaine and cocaethylene, and not degrade benzoylecgonine, the metabolite used in urinalyses for recent cocaine use.

The researchers also evaluated CocE”s ability to break down cocaine in the presence of drugs commonly co-abused with cocaine, and observed no reduction in CocE”s action in the presence of alcohol, nicotine, and morphine, among others.

These promising results, in combination with previous studies that show CocE can reverse cocaine-induced cardiovascular changes, seizures, convulsions and lethality in rodent models, suggest that CocE may be a good candidate for clinical treatment of cocaine toxicity. (ANI)

Simple blood test may predict Alzheimer’s risk

Washington, July 14 (ANI): Scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) are working on a simple blood test that may help predict Alzheimer’s risk.

They say amyloid beta forms the plaques considered the hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, and if the immune system isn’t adequately clearing amyloid beta, it may indicate Alzheimer’s risk.

MP Biomedicals LLC, a global life sciences and diagnostics company dedicated to Alzheimer’s disease research, has received an exclusive, worldwide license to commercialize the UCLA technology and to create a diagnostic blood test for public use to screen for Alzheimer’s risk.

“Early diagnosis is the cornerstone of preventive approaches to Alzheimer’s disease,” said Dr. Milan Fiala, lead author of the UCLA study and a researcher at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

“We are pleased that the process we’ve identified using immune cells to help predict Alzheimer’s risk will be further developed by MP Biomedicals,” Fiala added.

“We are excited by the opportunity to forward the UCLA science in creating a cost-effective blood test to screen for Alzheimer’s risk that could be used in any hospital or lab,” said Milan Panic, CEO of MP Biomedicals.

During the study, researchers took blood samples and isolated monocytes, which from birth act as the immune system’s janitors, travelling through the brain and body and gobbling up waste products – including amyloid beta.

The monocytes were incubated overnight with amyloid beta, which was labelled with a fluorescent marker.

Using a common laboratory method known as flow cytometry, the researchers then measured the amount of amyloid beta ingested by the immune cells by assessing how much fluorescence was being emitted from each monocyte cell.

The 18 Alzheimer’s disease patients in the study showed the least uptake of amyloid beta.

The results were found to be positive in 94 percent of the Alzheimer’s patients, and negative in 100 percent of the university professor control group.

In addition, the results were found to be positive in 60 percent of study participants who suffered from mild cognitive impairment, a condition that increases the risk of developing Alzheimer’s.

“Similar to screening patients for heart disease risk by a cholesterol test, a positive result for Alzheimer’s risk in some patients may suggest further interventions and advanced diagnostics, such as a brain PET scan and neurocognitive testing,” said Fiala.

The study has been reported in the Journal of Neuroimmunology. (ANI)

Chinese mind-body training technique improves attention, reduces stress

Washington, May 20 (ANI): Just five days of practicing a newly emerging mind-body technique may produce effective changes in attention and stress reduction, say Chinese researchers.

Now undergraduates at the University of Oregon are being taught the practice-called integrative body-mind training (IBMT)-which was adapted from traditional Chinese medicine in the 1990s in China, where it is practiced by thousands of people.

In a 2007 study, the researchers had reported that doing IBMT prior to a mental math test led to low levels of the stress hormone cortisol among Chinese students, along with lower levels of anxiety, depression, anger and fatigue than students in a relaxation control group.

“The previous paper indicated that IBMT subjects showed a reduced response to stressWhy after five days did it work so fast?” said UO professor Yi-Yuan Tang.

He says that the new findings point to how IBMT alters blood flow and electrical activity in the brain, breathing quality and even skin conductance, allowing for “a state of ah, much like in the morning opening your eyes, looking outside the grass and sunshine, you feel relaxed, calm and refresh without any stress, this is the meditation state.”

Using several technologies, the researchers conducted two experiments involving 86 undergraduate students at Dalian University of Technology and analyzed the data collected.

“We were able to show that the training improved the connection between a central nervous system structure, the anterior cingulate, and the parasympathetic part of the autonomic nervous system to help put a person into a more bodily state. The results seem to show integration-a connectivity of brain and body,” said UO psychologist Michael Posner.

In each experiment, participants who had not previously practiced relaxation or meditation received either IBMT or general relaxation instruction for 20 minutes a day for five days.

After conducting single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), the researchers found that both groups experienced some benefit from the training-those in IBMT showed dramatic differences based on brain-imaging and physiological testing.

Physiological tests also revealed that IBMT subjects had lower heart rates and skin conductance responses, increased belly breathing amplitude, and decreased chest respiration rates as compared with the relaxation group.

Finally, the researchers noted that IBMT subjects had more high-frequency heart-rate variability than their relaxation counterparts, indicating “successful inhibition of sympathetic tone and activation of parasympathetic tone (in the autonomic nervous system).”

IBMT avoids struggles to control thought, and instead relies on a state of restful alertness, allowing for a high degree of body-mind awareness while receiving instructions from a coach.

The study has been published online ahead of regular publication in PNAS. (ANI)

Women ‘handle stress better than men’

Washington, Apr 7 (ANI): It might not come as a surprise to most wives, mothers and female workers, but a new study has found that women cope better under strain than men.

What’s more, people of either sex with certain genetic advantages handle stress nicely.

Some people appear to be resilient to difficult conditions, whereas others react adversely to such challenges, incurring a range of physical and mental disorders. Much research has shown that the way in which the brain and body adapt to acute and chronic stress are critical for physical and mental health.

It is generally believed that the genetic code plays a prominent role in different responses to stress. It has been estimated that the heredity factor determines by some 62 percent the level of the stress hormone (cortisol) in our bodies. However, not much research has been done in this context.

Now, in an effort to reveal a genetic basis for coping with stress, Hebrew University researchers devised a laboratory-based social stress test.

The trials were carried out on students at the Hebrew University Department of Psychology and at the Aaron Beare Research Laboratories at Herzog Hospital by Idan Shalev, a doctoral student of Hebrew University Psychology Prof.
ichard Ebstein, and in collaboration with Dr. Marsha Kaitz of the Department of Psychology. The results were published recently online in the journal Psychoneuroendocrinology.

In the test, the researchers examined the salivary cortisol response in 97 university students via the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) devised at Trier University in Germany. The TSST measures changes in salivary cortisol to assess stress reactivity to challenging social situations.

The students were told that they would play the role of an interviewee for a job and had five minutes to convince the interviewers to hire them. The interview was carried out with a microphone and camera in front of a panel of three straight-faced judges. Additionally, in a second phase of the interview, subjects were tested in a mental arithmetic task in which they were asked to count backwards (out loud) from 1,687 in multiples of 13 as quickly and accurately as possible.

If the subject made a mistake he or she was asked to start the series again. In addition to testing the cortisol level, mouthwash samples were taken and subjects were genotyped for the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene, which is involved in supporting the growth and differentiation of brain cells. Importantly, animal studies show that BDNF expression is reduced in chronic stress and restored by antidepressant treatment.

The BDNF gene is characterized by a variant that codes for either the valine (Val) or methionine (Met) amino acids. Individuals carry two copies of each gene, with the Val variant being more common. In the study, subjects carrying two copies of the VAL variant (Val/Val), were compared in their cortisol response to those carrying one copy of the Val and one of the Met (Val/Met).

When looking at the responses of the subjects in the stress testing, it was seen that the Val/Met men and women carriers had nearly equal cortisol levels. However, the men with the Val/Val variant had a higher cortisol response (and therefore a higher reaction to social stress) than the men carrying the Val/Met variant. For the women, surprisingly, the opposite was found: the Val/Val women had a lower cortisol response than the Val/Met women. Why the Val/Val variant produces opposite stress reactions (raising it for the males and lowering it for the females) remains an enigma.

Because of the predominance of the Val/Val type for both sexes, the males showed overall greater stress in the testing than the females.

In conclusion, say the researchers, the study specifically indicates that women with the BDNF Val/Met genotype and men with the Val/Val may be particularly vulnerable to social stress mediated by brain stress system activity. (ANI)

Cooking may have given humans edge over apes by reducing energy cost of eating

Washington, February 14 (ANI): A study presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual meeting in Chicago this week suggested that cooking gave humans an evolutionary edge over apes in terms of growth.

The researchers presenting the study said that cooking, a “signature feature” of the human diet, might have originated in the extinct species Homo erectus 1.8 million years ago.

“The hallmark of dietary evolution is our flexibility and plasticity. What made humans humans is the ability to find or make a meal in the environment,” National Geographic quoted William Leonard, an anthropologist at Northwestern University who was not involved in the new research, as saying.

H. erectus had a large brain and body size, and many believe that the species’ hunter-gatherer lifestyle, associated with more cooked meat, fuelled its growth.

Scientists, however, have been unclear as to why they initially put food to fire.

Suggesting a reason for that, Harvard University biological anthropologist Richard Wrangham said that the earlier chefs might have started cooking because it decreases the energy cost of eating.

For primates, including humans, “energy is absolutely critical, and (it’s) what natural selection is constantly trying to maximize,” Wrangham said.

The researcher said that cooking makes starchy things gelatinous, breaks up proteins, and softens rock-hard edibles.

According to Wrangham, such textural and chemical changes make foods easier to eat and digest.

The researcher also said that the shift to cooking was reflected in modern human anatomy, as human jaws are considerably smaller and less able to bite into hard foods.

He further said that human gut is not set up for processing raw items as effectively as cooked food.

Leonard said that what set humans apart from apes was a need for a high-quality, high-calorie diet, combined with a drive to be active over a large area.

He said that humans’ “remarkable ability” to find and process many types of food is what probably led to the tremendous diversity of healthy diets across the globe.

The researcher, however, called humans “a victim of evolutionary successes” because people these days consume many calories, but don’t get nearly as much exercise as early humans. (ANI)