Obama to delay Australia trip

US president Barack Obama will delay his trip to Asia and Australia and there is a possibility he could cancel the trip altogether.

It all rests on the fate of Mr Obama’s healthcare reform.

The president was due to leave Washington late next week, travelling to Guam, Indonesia and Australia.

His spokesman Robert Gibbs says that is still the itinerary.

“We can’t lead in this region of the world without string bilateral relationships with Indonesia and Australia,” he said.

“They’re key in our ability to grow our country economy through increases export, and they’re key to tackling big challenges.”

The White House has portrayed this trip as an important moment for the president’s foreign policy agenda and just yesterday indicated there would be no delay.

But health care is more important for the president right now and the chances of a house vote by the White House deadline of March 18 appear unrealistic.

“We’ve been talking about this for more than a year,” Mr Gibbs said.

“I think the president wants – members of congress want – a vote as soon as possible that will lead to improved health care for millions of Americans.

“I will leave deadlines up to the speaker.”

Mr Obama met with Democrat leaders who agreed that the trip was important because of the large Muslim population in Indonesia and the important trading and defence ties with Australia.

Ron Brownstein, who writes for the Atlantic and National journal thinks there is still a possibility the trip could be cancelled.

“There’s no confusion in the White House about what the stakes are in this vote, not only in the historic sense of pursuing healthcare reform, which has defeated every president who has attempted it for 70 years, but also the broader implications for his presidency, for his ability to drive forward an agenda they understand,” he said.

“If they fail on this vote, their capacity to move forward on other issues is going to be severely diminished as well.”

Commentators were already suggesting his decision to take his family would require some skilful spin from the White House PR team.

Mr Gibbs says the changes to the itinerary meant the president’s daughters would miss school, so the decision was made to leave them at home.

Walter Lohman from the conservative think-tank The Heritage Foundation says there is nothing wrong with planning a trip where there is no concrete agreements to be signed or issues that must be resolved immediately.

“He is going to Bali,” he said. “It’s not exactly hardship duty, so he’ll have to limit the number of shots he takes from the beach.

“I think it’s fine for it to be largely symbolic. He’s got to start somewhere and that’s where he needs to start.

“I think putting too much pressure, especially on the Indonesia part of this, to come back with deliverables would be a mistake.”

The foundation’s Ted Bromund says the president needs to work on developing the kind of closeness George W Bush shared with some leaders.

“In addition to broader national and White House perspectives, if this trip leads to the creation of stronger personal relationships – which are a tremendous assistance in diplomacy – between the US and Australia and US and Indonesia, I think that would be all for the good,” he said.

The White House is yet to say whether the delay will affect the timing of his speech to the Australian Parliament, which is scheduled for Tuesday, March 23.

With the trip details still up in the air, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will just have to keep his diary flexible.

Hilary Clinton says US will not cede Asia-Pacific to anyone

London, May 20 (ANI): Rejecting Australian Defence White Paper’s claims that the US supremacy is fading in the Asia-Pacific region, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said that the US did not see the rise of China as “a zero-sum game” which would inevitably leave America weakened.

Speaking to the foreign press corps in Washington DC overnight, Clinton rejected that the economic rise of China and other nations in the region would inevitably mean that US power would decline after 2030 – and that Australia needs to prepare for that world.

“We don’t think it’s a zero-sum game. The fact that a country like China is becoming more successful, or Indonesia is now a very successful democracy, we see that as to the good for the entire Pacific region,” The Age quoted Clinton, as saying.

Several nations have expressed concern that the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, problems with Iran and engagement in the Middle East may sap US resources and attention, leaving the Asia-Pacific region as a fertile ground for China to extend its influence through diplomacy, economic leverage and aid.

But Clinton points out that her first official visit as Secretary of State had been to Asia.

“We want Australia, as well as other nations to know that the United States is not ceding the Pacific to anyone. We are a trans-Pacific power as well as a transatlantic power,” she said.

The US has indicated that it will sign the Treaty of Amity and Co-operation which is a necessary precursor to it joining the East Asia Summit.

“We have longstanding bilateral relationships with nations like Australia and others, and we have a very active multilateral agenda that we intend to reinvigorate, such as our membership in ASEAN and other fora within the Pacific region.”

Clinton also said, under the Obama administration, there had been “extremely successful” visits by Rudd and other senior ministers had led to “a broadening and a deepening of the relationship” and that both nations were looking at ways of enhancing cooperation when it comes to regional security. (ANI)

Expectations of Indo-Pak talks without Mumbai attack resolution ‘unrealistic’: Riedel

Lahore, Apr.19 (ANI): Until the issues regarding the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack are resolved between India and Pakistan, it is almost unrealistic to expect New Delhi to restart peace talks with Islamabad, an expert has said.

Former CIA Middle-East expert and a key advisor to President Barack Obama, Bruce Riedel says the Mumbai attack is the core of the issue between India and Pakistan currently.

“The first step in any process of trying to change the dynamics between Pakistan and India is to resolve the outstanding issues from the Mumbai attack,” Riedel told Outlook India.

Riedel said Pakistan must ensure India that it is sincere in the 26/11 investigations.

“India has made a compelling case that the Mumbai attack was launched from Pakistan, that it had a significant support base in Pakistan,” Riedel said , adding ” Pakistan has said it’s willing to cooperate with the investigation and that’s what it should continue to do.”

When enquired that whether he considered the Mumbai attack as an attack on the US-Israel-India cooperation against terror, because the attackers particularly targeted Jews, Christians and Hindus, Riedel said India’s relationship both with the US and Israel was not new.

“I don’t see this as a tripartite relationship, but as a series of bilateral relationships,” he said.

Riedel said the new US policy for Pakistan did not have any mention of sending troops on Pakistani soil to thwart the terror threat originating from there, because the there was not any UN mandate for such step.

“There’s no mandate from the UN for deployment of forces in Pakistan nor any request from the Pakistani government for troops in Pakistan,” The Daily Times quoted Riedel, as saying.

Commenting on Pakistan’s fears of increasing Indian influence in Afghanistan, he said: “India was a ‘major player’ in the rebuilding of the war-torn country and its aid projects were one of the largest of any country in the world.”

Riedel also expressed his concerns over the Pakistan Parliament’s approval to implement Islamic law in Swat Valley saying it was “not a productive way to move forward”. (ANI)