U.S. showed Pakistan evidence on militant faction

(Reuters) – The United States has presented evidence to Pakistan about the growing threat and reach of a militant faction which Washington suspects has ties to Pakistani intelligence, U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

World

In the presentations, U.S. military leaders provided Pakistan’s army chief with information detailing the role of the Haqqani network in a string of increasingly brazen bombings, including one last month targeting the main NATO air base at Bagram in Afghanistan.

Washington has long pressed Islamabad to crack down on the Haqqanis in the North Waziristan tribal zone bordering Afghanistan, who are closely aligned with the Taliban, but U.S. officials acknowledge it is a hard sell because of resistance within Pakistani intelligence.

General David Petraeus, who oversees the Afghan war as head of U.S. Central Command, told a congressional hearing the Haqqanis had “transnational” ambitions, suggesting they could try to strike beyond Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Washington has issued similar warnings about the growing reach of the Pakistani Taliban, which investigators blame for a botched May 1 car bomb in New York’s Time Square.

There are strategic reasons for Pakistan’s hesitancy to attack the Haqqanis, a faction which some in Islamabad see as a strategic asset that will give them influence in any eventual settlement to the war in neighboring Afghanistan.

One U.S. official said “some elements” of Pakistani intelligence, but far from all, still support the Haqqanis.

Without mentioning the Haqqanis by name, Petraeus acknowledged long-standing ties between Islamabad and what he called “bad guys,” suggesting the relationships were useful to gather intelligence on the groups.

But he voiced confidence Pakistanis understood that “you cannot allow poisonous snakes to have a nest in your backyard, even if the tacid agreement is that they’re going to bite the neighbors kids instead of yours.”

“Eventually,” Petraeus said, “they turn around and bite you and your kids.”

Pakistan has denied a report by the London School of Economics that alleges enduring ties between its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency and the Afghan Taliban.

PAKISTAN INTELLIGENCE ROLE

The report said the agency not only funds and trains Taliban fighters in Afghanistan but is officially represented on the movement’s leadership council, giving it significant influence over operations.

Petraeus said there was “no question” Pakistan has maintained “a variety of relationships,” in some cases dating back decades, to groups which, with U.S. support, battled the Soviets when they occupied Afghanistan.

“Some of those ties continue in various forms, some of them, by the way, gathering intelligence,” he said.

“You have to have contact with bad guys to get intelligence on bad guys.”

Some of the groups in question, including the Haqqani network, are now leading the fight against Western forces.

The Pentagon has expressed confidence that Pakistan will eventually mount an offensive in North Waziristan, but has acknowledged the country’s armed forces were already stretched by operations in other tribal areas.

“The problem has been one of capacity. And again, we’re working hard to enable that capacity,” Petraeus said.

Petraeus, General Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, discussed Haqqani’s alleged role in the bombings in a recent meeting with Pakistan’s army chief Ashfaq Kayani.

“We have shared information with him about links of the leadership of the Haqqani network … that clearly commanded and controlled the operation against Bagram air base and the attack in Kabul, among others,” Petraeus said.

Suicide bombers carrying rockets and grenades launched a brazen predawn attack on the base on May 19, killing an American contractor and wounding nine U.S. troops. About a dozen militants, many wearing suicide vests packed with explosives, were killed, the Pentagon said at the time.

A day earlier, a suicide bomber attacked a military convoy in Kabul, killing 12 Afghan civilians and six foreign troops.

Bagram is the main base for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan, with the largest airfield in the country. It was used by the former Soviet Union during its invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart; editing by Todd Eastham)

US general declares war on junk food

The US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, has banned American and NATO troops from eating fast food.

The general, who runs 13 kilometres every morning and eats just one meal a day, has ordered junk food outlets on all military bases to be closed.

Military leaders say the decision was made because Afghanistan is a war zone, not an amusement park.

The decision is not likely to be popular with those stationed on bases serviced by fast food outlets, but will free up supply lines for frontline soldiers in need of fresh food and running water.

“From the moment [General] McChrystal and I arrived in Afghanistan last summer, we began looking for ways to do things more efficiently across the battlefield,” Sergeant-Major Michael Hall wrote in a military blog, quoted by the Times Online.

“This effort includes moving and reallocating resources to better accomplish our mission.

“Supplying non-essential luxuries to big bases like Bagram and Kandahar makes it harder to get essential items to combat outposts and forward operating bases, where troops who are in the fight each day need resupplying with ammunition, food and water.”

Last year, General McChrystal banned alcohol at NATO’s Kabul headquarters after complaining that too many staff were coming to work with a hangover.

US commanders in Afghanistan seek more troops

New York, Aug 24 (ANI): American military commanders operating with the NATO led mission in Afghanistan have informed President Barack Obama’s special envoy to the region, Richard C. Holbrooke, that they do not have enough troops to do their job, and are being pushed past their limit by Taliban rebels who operate across borders.

The American commanders spoke with Holbrooke this weekend, The New York Times reported.

Over the past two days, Holbrooke visited all four regional command centers in Afghanistan, and the message from all four followed similar lines: While the additional American troops, along with smaller increases from other NATO members, have had some benefit in the south, the numbers remain below what commanders need.

The total number of American soldiers and Marines in Afghanistan is now about 57,000. It was unclear whether the commanders told Holbrooke exactly how many additional troops might be required.

Eastern Afghanistan, in particular, has been a trouble spot. On Sunday, during Holbrooke’s stop at the Bagram military base, Major General Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of the United States and NATO forces in eastern Afghanistan, told him and visiting reporters that the Haqqani network was expanding its reach.

“We’ve seen that expansion, and that’s part of what we’re fighting,” The NYT quoted him, as saying.

American commanders believe that the network, whose leaders Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son Sirajuddin have been linked to Al Qaeda, are using sanctuaries in Pakistan to launch attacks against American and Afghan forces.

The problems in Afghanistan have been aggravated by what the American commanders call the Pakistani military’s limited response to the threat of militants based there.

Although General Scaparrotti said that cooperation by Pakistan and the United States against the militants had improved recently, he stressed that it was important for the Pakistanis to keep up the pressure, particularly after the reported killing of Baitullah Mehsud.

Holbrooke visited regional command centers in Kandahar, Herat, Mazar-i-Sharif and Bagram on Saturday and Sunday.

Speaking to Afghan reporters at the NATO base in Mazar-i-Sharif, Holbrooke said that part of the new strategy would include reaching out to members of the Taliban who show a willingness to lay down their arms. (ANI)

Bush appointed Fed judges question Obama on terror policies

Washington, July 1 (ANI): President Barack Obama’s claims of broad executive authority to carry out the war on terror are drawing fire from an unexpected source: federal judges nominated by President George W. Bush, who asserted the sweeping powers in the first place.

In recent weeks, three different Bush appointees considering cases relating to war-on-terror detainees have rejected arguments from Obama’s Justice Department, which adopted virtually unchanged the positions the Bush administration had staked out.
In each case, according to Politico, the Bush-appointed judge said the executive branch was overstepping its authority and claiming more powers than the law allowed.

The irony, of course, is that Democrats railed against Bush for what many saw as a power grab in the months and years after the Sept. 11 attacks – when Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney asserted vast executive branch authority to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and to hold prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere.

In the years since, courts from the Supreme Court on down have begun to pare back that authority, saying in several high-profile rulings that Bush overstepped his bounds.

Since taking office, Obama has adopted many of these broad claims to executive authority as he’s inherited the war on terror from the past administration – but he is now facing some of the same legal constraints that Bush began to encounter in his closing years in office, sometimes in sharply worded decisions that show some courts have decided it’s time to rein in executive power.

In April, Judge John Bates turned aside the arguments of the Obama and Bush administrations in ruling that some prisoners at the U.S.-run Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan were entitled to challenge their detention in court if they were captured outside Afghanistan.

Earlier this month, San Francisco-based Judge Jeffrey White surprised many legal analysts when he refused to dismiss a lawsuit an alleged Al Qaeda operative and convicted terrorist, Jose Padilla, brought against former Justice Department attorney John Yoo over his alleged involvement in Bush’s decision to hold Padilla in a South Carolina Navy brig for more than three years.

And in a ruling last week, Judge Richard Leon second-guessed the Obama and Bush administrations’ claims that a Syrian detainee, Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak al-Janko, could be held at Guantanamo even though he was considered a spy by Al Qaeda and tortured at some length before he was captured by the U.S. in Afghanistan.

Several legal analysts said they doubted the judges were acting out of any desire to trip up Obama.

“I don’t think it’s partisan or personal,” said David Rivkin, a conservative attorney and lawyer for the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

Rivkin called the rulings “bad” and “deeply violative of constitutional principles,” but he said the decisions from Bush judges were a logical outgrowth of Supreme Court decisions pushing the judiciary to assert itself.

Even after the stinging defeats, the Obama Justice Department is continuing to fight at least two of the rulings. (ANI)

NYT reporter flees seven-month Taliban captivity

New York, June 21 (ANI): A US journalist kidnapped by the Taliban in Afghanistan last year has managed to escape from the compound where he was being held, The New York Times reports.

David Rohde, a New York Times reporter who was kidnapped by the Taliban, escaped Friday night and made his way to freedom after more than seven months of captivity in the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The newspaper says its reporter scaled the wall of the compound with an Afghan journalist.

Rohde, along with a local reporter, Tahir Ludin, and their driver, Asadullah Mangal, was abducted outside Kabul, Afghanistan, on November 10, 2008 while he was researching on a book.

Rohde was part of The Times’s reporting team that won a Pulitzer Prize this spring for coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan last year.

Rohde told his wife, Kristen Mulvihill, that Ludin joined him in climbing over the wall of a compound where they were being held in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan. They made their way to a nearby Pakistani Frontier Corps base and on Saturday they were flown to the US military base in Bagram, Afghanistan.

The driver, Mangal, did not escape with the other two men. The initial report was that Rohde was in good health, while Ludin injured his foot in the escape, The New York Times reports.

Until now, The NYT and other media organizations out of concern for the men’s safety have kept the kidnapping quiet.

Rohde’s keen interest in Afghanistan was ignited in the intense three months he spent there after the September 11, 2001, attacks, and cemented during his tenure as co-chief of The Times’s South Asia bureau from 2002 to 2005.

He continued to travel to Afghanistan after he returned to New York, where he is a member of The Times’s investigations department. (ANI)

Prisoners held in Afghanistan can challenge detention: US court

Washington, April 3 (DPA) A US federal court ruled Thursday that a group of prisoners being held by the US forces in Afghanistan have the right to challenge their detentions in courts, in a blow to the powers of President Barack Obama’s new administration.

Judge John Bates, of the district court in the US capital Washington, ruled the cases of three prisoners being held at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan are ‘virtually identical’ to those being held at the controversial prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Obama has pushed through a series of dramatic shifts to former president George W. Bush’s policies in the war against terrorism, pledging to close Guantanamo within a year and bring charges against many of its prisoners in US courts.

But the administration argued different rules applied to detainees in Afghanistan, because the prisoners were being held in a ‘theatre of war’. Bates rejected that argument because many of the prisoners had been brought to Bagram from other countries.

The three prisoners, two Yemenis and one Tunisian national, all claim they were captured outside of Afghanistan and transferred to Bargram, where they have been held for more than six years.

Bates said all three should be granted so-called ‘habeus corpus’ rights to challenge their detentions, following a similar Supreme Court ruling last year that applied to Guantanamo inmates. An appeal by a fourth prisoner, an Afghan national, was rejected.

Abu Nasar becomes new al Qaeda leader of Gulf region

Peshawar, Feb 23 (ANI): Abu Nasar Al-Haweshi from Yemen has been nominated as al-Qaeda’s leader for the Gulf Region.

Belonging to Yemen, Abu Nasar Al-Haweshi, also known as Abu Baseer, is active in al-Qaeda since long.

The Nation quoted highly placed reliable sources as saying that Abu Nasar’s nomination aimed at filling the office, which had fallen vacant after the death of Abu Zarqavi in Iraq in 2006.

According to sources, there was no replacement of Zarqavi since his death. Now both Osama bin Laden and Aymaan Al Zawahiri agreed on assigning the task to Abu Nasar Al Haweshi.

The assignments of Abu Nasar, beside engineering and plotting, include collection of donation for war from the Gulf region and facilitating the militants in getting training from border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Abu Nasar was considered fifth amongst leading al Qaeda commanders like Abu Laith Al Laibi, Abu Zarqavi, Abdullah Kurd and Abdul Hadi.

Both Abdul Hadi and Abu Zarqavi were killed in Iraq, Abu Laith Al Laibi in North Waziristan and Abdullah Kurd in Qandahar Afghanistan.

Abu Nasar remained in Duranta training camps during Taliban regime in Afghanistan, the paper reported.

He also fought against the Northern Alliance, headed by late Ahmad Shah Mesud in Takhar, Hirat and Bagram regions. He had served Osama bin Laden as his security chief for a couple of months.

During his stay in Afghanistan, Abu Nasar remained very close to both former ministers Maulvi Jalaluddin Haqqani and Mullah Mohammad Hassan Akhund. (ANI)

Pentagon looking for alternatives to GITMO

Washington, Jan.14 (ANI): The Pentagon is looking at several military bases in the U.S. as possible sites to hold terrorist suspects now at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including Camp Pendleton in San Diego and Fort Leavenworth in Kansas.

Kansas Republican Senator Sam Brownback told The Washington Times that an internal Pentagon study named Fort Leavenworth among other locations.

Fort Leavenworth is the site of a military training program for foreign military officers. Brownback, however, said he feared the presence of Guantanamo prisoners would destroy the program.

Brownback said the Pentagon study group was tasked with finding a place that is available to move detainees as soon as the incoming administration of Barack Obama announces its plans.

Obama has pledged to close the detention facility at Guantanamo, which has become an open sore for the U.S. in its relations with other nations, especially in the Islamic world.

House Armed Services Committee spokeswoman Lara Battles said there have been growing concerns in Congress over bringing 274 prisoners now being held at Guantanamo.

Locations under discussion have included foreign military bases like Bagram in Afghanistan, in addition to Camp Pendleton and Fort Leavenworth. (ANI)