Popular autism diet brings no change in behaviour

Washington, May 20 (ANI): Eliminating gluten and casein from the diets of children with autism brings no change in their behaviour, sleep or bowel patterns, a new American research has revealed.

The study is the most controlled diet research in autism to date.

The researchers took on the difficult yet crucial task of ensuring participants received needed nutrients, as children on gluten-free, casein-free diets may eat inadequate amounts of vitamin D, calcium, iron and high quality protein.

Unlike previous studies, they also controlled for other interventions, such as what type of behavioural treatments children received, to ensure all observed changes were due to dietary alterations.

Although no improvements were demonstrated, the researchers acknowledged that some subgroups of children, particularly those with significant gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, might receive some benefit from dietary changes.

Susan Hyman, associate professor of Paediatrics at Golisano Children”s Hospital at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) and principal investigator of the study, said: “It would have been wonderful for children with autism and their families if we found that the GFCF diet could really help, but this small study didn”t show significant benefits.

“However, the study didn”t include children with significant gastrointestinal disease. It”s possible those children and other specific groups might see a benefit.”

Hyman added: “This is really just the tip of the iceberg. There are many possible effects of diet including over- and under-nutrition, on behaviour in children with ASD that need to be scientifically investigated so families can make informed decisions about the therapies they choose for their children.”

The findings of the study will be presented May 22 at the International Meeting for Autism Research in Philadelphia. (ANI)

Advance towards prenatal autism screening triggers debate

London, Jan1 2 (ANI): Prenatal tests for autism may soon be available, thanks to scientists at Cambridge University’s autism research centre, whose breakthrough study has prompted experts to call for a national debate about the consequences of screening for the disorder in the womb, and allowing women to terminate babies with the condition.

The study followed 235 children from birth to the age of eight, and found that high levels of testosterone in the amniotic fluid of pregnant women was linked to autistic traits, like a lack of sociability and verbal skills, in their children by the time they are eight.

The discovery has raised the possibility of an amniocentesis (the same procedure used to test for Down’s syndrome) to detect autism.

However, enabling couples to terminate the pregnancy after the detection of an autistic disorder might turn out to be highly controversial.

In particular, parents of children with autistic spectrum disorders do not approve of testing linked to termination, because they fear it would lead to greater discrimination and less support for them.

Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, director of the research team, said that it was their right time to start considering where society stood on the issue.

“If there was a prenatal test for autism, would this be desirable? What would we lose if children with autistic spectrum disorder were eliminated from the population? We should start debating this. There is a test for Down’s syndrome and that is legal and parents exercise their right to choose termination, but autism is often linked with talent. It is a different kind of condition,” the Guardian quoted him as saying.

However, on the other hand, the research could pave the way for treatment, he said.

“We could do something about it. Some researchers or drug companies might see this as an opportunity to develop a pre-natal treatment. There are drugs that block testosterone. But whether we’d want to would be a different matter,” he said.

According to the National Autistic Society, some of its members think a test to predict autism could be useful in helping parents prepare and get support for their child.

“I think it is really important that the autism community has a key role in shaping the research priorities in this area,” said Amanda Batten, head of campaigns for the NAS.

She added: “There could be some real gains in recognising autism early. There are benefits, but there are concerns. People think it is about eugenics.

“It is important to stress that everyone with autism has the potential to make a unique and valued contribution to society. It is not always the autism that is a problem. It is other people and a lack of services and support.”

However, she added that the more complicated ethical issue would be that of treatment in the womb, saying: “You get to the situation where you have a very great difficulty if families say we wouldn’t want to be tested. As a society, do we accept that people can refuse tests when the outcome can make a difference to that unborn child?” (ANI)