Displaced Bru families returning to their homes in Mizoram

New Delhi /Aizwal, May 21 (ANI): All 154 Bru families who were displaced from Mizoram in November 2009 returned to their homes on Friday in 78 jeeps with one police escort for every 10 jeeps.

The Mizoram Government and the Tripura Government provided the transport and security facilities.

According to the Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR), a total of 210 Bru families will return by 26 May 2010.

“In the midst of communal tensions in Manipur and Meghalaya, the return of the Brus for the first time since they fled to Tripura in 1997 indeed provides a unique opportunity to Mizoram to identify itself as the most peaceful state in North East India,” the ACHR said in a statement.

ACHR Director Suhas Chakma said the Mizoram must seize the opportunity to resolve the Bru crisis once and for all.

On 15 February, the Bru Coordination Committee submitted its demands to the Union Home Ministry for the return of the Brus displaced in

November 2009.

The Home Ministry, after holding discussion with the Mizoram Government had informed the ACHR that it had sanctioned grants-in-aid of Rs. 2.43 crore to the Mizoram for meeting expenditure on repatriation and rehabilitation of Bru families.

This assistance would be utilized by State Government of Mizoram for providing housing assistance at Rs. 38,500 per Bru family whose huts were burnt, free ration to such families for a period of 9 months, cost of transportation from Tripura to the Bru villages in Mizoram, the Ministry stated.

Apart from these, assistance include cost of preparation of land for Jhum cultivation to Bru families who did not flee to Tripura, household kits and implements and for meeting cost of construction of barracks, sentry posts etc. for State Armed Police and India Reserve (IR) battalions who would be deployed in relevant areas for facilitating peaceful repatriation and rehabilitation of Bru migrants.(ANI)

CPI-M, Asian Centre for Human Rights condemn Dantewada massacre

New Delhi, May 18 (ANI): The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) and Asian Centre for Human Rights on Tuesday condemned the Maoist attack that killed over 30 people in Chhattisgarh”s Dantewada District, saying it only highlights the ”bankrupt” policies of the left extremist organization, which violate international humanitarian law and constitute war crime.

“The attack on a private passenger bus by the Maoists only highlights their bankrupt policies of attacking ordinary citizens in various parts of the country, including tribals who refuse to accept their dictates,” the Party Polit Bureau said in a statement.

The CPI-M has appealed to the people to raise their voice against the ”murderous” attack on locals and their livelihood and resist their ”depredations” against peaceful citizens.

“”Any attack by the Maoists cannot be condoned. Such attacks on civilians violates international humanitarian law and constitute war crime under Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,” stated Suhas Chakma, Director of the Asian Centre for Human Rights.

“This is not the first dastardly attack on civilians by the Maoists which is a clear violation of the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions,” he added.

The Asian Centre for Human Rights urged the Maoists not to attack civilians. It also recommended that security forces should not travel on civilian buses as this increases the risk to the lives of the civilians.

Meanwhile, Chhattisgarh went on top alert in the wake of the killing by Naxalites in Dantewada and a two-day shutdown called by the ultras from Tuesday to protest the anti-Maoist operations by the security forces.

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh on Monday said the Naxal attack in Dantewada District showed their desperation.

He said the Maoists, who were losing support base, acted desperately.

“This incident shows the cruel face of the Naxals. We have been saying this… when the Naxals support base finishes they resort to such methods. Their (Naxals) belief in people”s representatives and local population has finished,” said Singh.

He said it is difficult for the State Government to deploy security personnel in every village.

“There cannot be police personnel in every village. There are 20 thousand villages,” Singh said.

He claimed that as the security forces are gaining grounds at many places, the security cover would be enhanced gradually.

The attack is the second in little over a month after 76 security personnel were killed on April 6 in Dantewada District.

The Naxals attacked a bus carrying passengers from Gadiras to Bhusaras in Dantewada district.

Naxals blew up the bus using Improvised Explosive Device (IED) at around 4.45 p.m.

The blast incident took place a day after the Maoists called for a 48-hour shutdown in the five states of Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh. (ANI)

Asian rights body lauds NHRC order to Army to pay compensation for innocents torture in Assam

New Delhi, Mar. 15 (ANI): The Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) today welcomed the order of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) that directed the Ministry of Defence, Government of India to pay a compensation of Rs. 50,000 each to two torture victims, namely Bhadrakanta Baruah and Ghana
Neog who were tortured in the custody of the 871st Field Regiment of the Army at Maibela camp in Sivasagar district, Assam on 31st January 2009. (ANI)

Orissa pays compensation for custodial death of a prisoner

New Delhi, Sep.14 (ANI): The Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) today welcomed the payment of compensation of Rs 100,000 by the Orissa government to the family members of Takala alias Muktikanta Muduli, an undertrial prisoner who died in Balasore District jail of Orissa on 29 August 2007.

The National Human Rights Commission informed the ACHR on September 12, 2009 that its order for payment of compensation to the deceased’s family has been complied with by the State government and payment of proof has been submitted.

On September 4, 2007, ACHR filed a complained alleging death of Muktikanta Muduli due to torture by the jail officials at District Jail, Balasore. A joint enquiry conducted by Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM) and Additional Superintendent of Police, Balasore revealed that Muktikanta Muduli died after the jail warder Sarbeshwar Das tied him, who was suffering from alleged alcohol withdrawal, to the iron grill of the cell with a lungi (loin cloth) and kept him in standing position for over three hours for allegedly causing nuisance and discomfort to other prisoners.

Muduli collapsed while still being tied to the iron grill and died on the spot. The SDM concluded that “the fatigue, pain and broken health due to drunkenness had led to the collapse of the prisoner”.

The state government of Orissa defended the action of the jail warder as “an act in good faith and without malice”. The NHRC found no merit in the plea taken by the State Government and asserted that “If the prisoner was showing withdrawal symptoms and causing nuisance and discomfort to the other prisoners, there could have been better and civilized ways to control him.

It was utterly inhumane to tie his hands behind him and to keep him standing for more than three hours.”

The NHRC held that the State cannot escape its liability and directed to pay compensation of Rs.100,000.

“The Asian Centre for Human Rights welcomes the decision of the NHRC to reject the lame excuse of the state government of Orissa. However, the NHRC must develop cogent guidelines on the amount of compensation paid. The compensation of Rs 100000 is highly inadequate,” said Suhas Chakma, Director of Asian Centre for Human Rights. (ANI)

Naxals condemned for massacre of civilians in Jharkhand

New Delhi, Sep 7 (ANI): Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) today condemned the killing of five innocent villagers, including two students by the cadres of the Communist Party of India (Maoists) at Pundigiri in Ranchi district of Jharkhand on the night of September 6 as a blatant violation of the international humanitarian law, the Geneva Conventions.

The Maoists reportedly abducted the five villagers and executed them on the charge of being police informers.

Earlier on August 28, 2009, the Maoists had shot dead four villagers, including a woman and a 12-year-old girl at Bundu village near Pundigiri in Ranchi district.

“The killings are acts of terrorism. The culprits must be brought to justice, and the State must examine the culpability of the leadership of the Communist Party of India (Maoists) for these wanton killings,” said Suhas Chakma, Director, Asian Centre for Human Rights.

ACHR stated that without the sanction of the leadership of the CPI (Maoists) these systematic killings of civilians cannot take place. ACHR urged the Maoists leadership to immediately stop the killing of innocent civilians. (ANI)

Sri Lanka’s expulsion of UNICEF official is a clear warning to all UN agencies: ACHR

New Delhi/Colombo, Sep.7 (ANI): A New Delhi-based human rights watchdog has said that the expulsion of a senior UNICEF official by the Government of Sri Lanka “is a clear warning to the UN agencies and all relief workers not to speak out about the situation of 300,000 Tamils who are being interned.”

Suhas Chakma, Director of the Asian Centre for Human Rights, said: “It is worse than the way UN agencies are treated by authoritarian regimes and sets a new low. Burma treats aid workers better.”

Chakma was referring to Colombo’s move to give James Elder, UNICEF’s head of communications in Colombo, two weeks to leave the country after he expressed concerns about the plight of Tamils in the government-run “welfare camps”.

Elder is the first UN official to be expelled from the country. He was told that his diplomatic status will be revoked, even though his visa does not expire until next July.

There was no response from the government yesterday, although it has been reported that immigration authorities in Colombo had been instructed by the government to cancel the visa.

According to local newspapers, the government had been angered by remarks made by Elder to the media about the conditions in government camps that are home to almost 300,000 Tamils displaced after the Sri Lankan army routed the separatist Tamil Tiger rebels in May.

Elder warned recently that the island’s impending monsoon would flood the refugee camps, and called on the government to act.

UNICEF and the government had been involved in a war of words over who was responsible for supplying the camps with basic facilities such as toilets and tents. The government said criticisms over lack of facilities should be levelled at the aid agencies.

UNICEF pointed out ultimate responsibility for the camps rested with the government, and that the UN’s support had been greatly hindered by the government’s restrictions on access to the camps.

Elder, an Australian national, was a familiar figure to those who covered the bloody end game of the Sri Lankan civil war. He had been working in Sri Lanka for UNICEF since July last year and had been featured on foreign television news channels as well as quoted in international media. (ANI)

Sri Lanka’s expulsion of top UN official condemned

New Delhi, Sep.6 (ANI): Asian Centre for Human Rights today condemned the expulsion of James Elder, the Communications Chief of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) by the Sri Lankan Government over his remarks about the Internally Displaced People (IDPs), in particular, the conditions of children in camps.

Elder was told on Saturday to leave within two weeks.

“This is an obnoxious attempt to turn the IDP camps into closed door slaughter houses where children are being killed as a result of manufactured starvation and where thousands of ethnic Tamils have been disappearing at the hands of the Sri Lankan army,” said Suhas Chakma, Director of the ACHR.

Over 13,000 Tamil IDPs have disappeared according to various UN reports and only about 2,000 detainees are subject to visits by the International Committee of the Red Cross.

The Asian Centre for Human Rights urged the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and international donors, including India, which sanctioned Rs 500 crores for the Sri Lankan Tamil refugees, to demand revocation of expulsion of Elder, full and unrestricted access to the IDP camps by the United Nations and international agencies, and respect for human rights and humanitarian law standards by the Sri Lankan government.

“Unless international donors ensure respect for full and unrestricted access, they shall be condoning and contributing to continued flagrant violations of international human rights and humanitarian law standards by the Sri Lankan government,” Chakma added. (ANI)

Right to development most important: Muchkund Dubey

New Delhi, April 3 (IANS) The right to development should subsume all other rights in this country, says former foreign secretary Muchkund Dubey, now the joint editor of a book on rights and entitlements.

Edited by Dubey and M.K. Jabbi, director of the Council for Social Development, the book, ‘A Social Charter for India: Citizens’ Perspective for Basic Rights’, was released in the capital Thursday by Magsaysay awardee Aruna Roy.

At the 10th SAARC summit in Colombo in 1998, it was agreed that an inter-governmental social charter for South Asia under the aegis of SAARC would be drawn up.

A non-governmental think-tank, the South Asian Centre for Policy Studies, prepared a citizens’ social charter for south Asian member nations listing their rights and demands.

On cue, the Council for Social Development in India envisaged a social charter on the rights and entitlements of citizens after a two-level consultation.

The result is ‘A Social Charter….’. The book is priced at Rs.625 and has been published by Pearson Longman – an imprint of Pearson Education publishing group.

Describing the making of the book, Dubey, now president of the Delhi-based Council for Social Development, said he had invited 150 NGOs from all over the country to brainstorm.

‘But nearly 40 turned up. We had two rounds of discussions during which this charter was developed. I told the NGOs that I did not require treatises or descriptions of the rights and demands from them – just written lists. It was a different kind of intellectual input. We also added a chapter on right to development – which subsumes all other rights and issues,’ Dubey said.

The volume is divided into two sections. The first section comprises 10 essays, each written by an eminent scholar.

The first two chapters probes the basic rights of Indian citizens based on the Constitution of India, Supreme Court judgements and international declarations.

The rest of the chapters surmise the current situations in India in areas like health, education, environment, women, children, the poor and suggests rights and entitlements in each of these sectors.

However, the real challenge before the civil society, Dubey felt, was to enlarge the consensus on rights and include more aspects that had not been covered like the right to information and labour rights.

The book takes off from the premise that various declarations and covenants have recognised basic fundamental rights for all citizens.

For the citizens to enjoy these rights, says K.R. Venugopal in his introductory essay, the state has an obligation to create appropriate conditions without distinction or discriminations of any kind. The state has to play a proactive role in ensuring these rights to its citizens.

Addressing the function, Sydea S. Hameed, member of the Planning Commission, said the postulations in the charter had to become a living instrument.

Recalling the contribution of citizens at the grassroots to create awareness about rights and entitlements, Hameeda said: ‘In 1997, I chanced upon Aruna Roy in Jaipur in Rajasthan. She was raising awareness about the right to information. It was an eye opener. The work that she has done 12 years ago has borne fruit now,’ Hameeda said.

Hameeda, who is sensitive to issues of women’s empowerment, has for the first time created a gender lens in the country’s national plan, a concern that resonates in the book.

‘One of the things I did in the 11th five-year plan was to create a gender lens (a gender-sensitive approach) in every sector – be it rural development, education, health, agriculture, roads, highways, Scheduled Caste and Tribes’ welfare. Everything will have to be looked through a gender lens so that women are not relegated to the margins. Some of the schemes attributed to women had men in it. We have broken new ground,’ Hameeda said.