Pentagon boosting Afghanistan “eyes in the sky”

(Reuters) – The Pentagon is intensely focused on getting more trucks, surveillance equipment and other military equipment into Afghanistan to prepare for what will be a critical summer in the war, Defense Undersecretary Ashton Carter said on Friday.

World | Barack Obama

Carter, head of Pentagon acquisition, technology and logistics, said the success of the U.S. war in Afghanistan would depend largely on being able to get weapons and support services to the U.S. troops headed to the land-locked country, which he described as “the last place where you would like to be fighting a war.”

“This summer is going to be very critical. If we don’t get ourselves in there and get set … we can’t have success,” he told a conference hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies,

As part of that effort, Carter said he was increasing 20-fold the number of airships hovering over Afghanistan, providing “eyes in the sky” to troops on the ground.

Equipped with sophisticated cameras and the ability to stream images to U.S. bases on the ground, the airships would help track any activity that could jeopardize the troops, including the burying of roadside bombs.

At the same time, the very visible presence of the airships would keep potential attackers on their guard, Carter said, calling the airships a more affordable way to maintain surveillance than more expensive unmanned airplanes, which are also being deployed in Afghanistan in large numbers.

Carter did not name the airship maker, and Pentagon officials were not immediately available for comment.

South Dakota-based Raven Industries Inc last month said it had a tethered airship backlog of more than $10 million. It said the airships would be paired with surveillance equipment and deployed in Afghanistan.

Aria International, based in Virginia, also makes a helium-filled blimp equipped with infrared thermal cameras, and Lockheed Martin Corp has a larger version that it has been promoting to the military for years.

The unmanned airships will cut the need for risky on-foot missions by staying in the air much longer and feeding data to commanders through on-board cameras and sensors.

These sensors could also “rewind” after an explosion to find who planted the bomb and where they went.

Carter said the airships would be under the control of local forward operating bases, not commanders far away, making them a good tool on a fairly localized basis.

He said the Pentagon was also accelerating delivery of hand-held metal detectors and ground-penetrating radars, as part of an urgent drive to reduce the number of casualties from road-side bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

The military was also deploying about 1,000 new armored trucks built by Oshkosh Corp per month, double the initial rate, Carter said.

He said Defense Secretary Robert Gates had told him to “make sure that we are doing all we can do” to prevent the large number of IED-related troop deaths and injuries that marked the early years of the Iraq war.

The Pentagon was also examining several models of unmanned helicopters that could be used to get supplies to troops without using dangerous convoys on the road, he said.

At the same time the military is dramatically increasing its presence in Afghanistan, it was also dealing with the drawdown in Iraq, a major logistical challenge, Carter said.

He said the military had already removed 2.2 million pieces of military equipment from more than 350 forward operating bases in Iraq but needed to deal with 1.2 million more pieces by August, deciding if they should return to the United States, stay in Iraq or go elsewhere for use in future conflicts.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

Pentagon boosting Afghanistan “eyes in the sky”

(Reuters) – The Pentagon is intensely focused on getting more trucks, surveillance equipment and other military equipment into Afghanistan to prepare for what will be a critical summer in the war, Defense Undersecretary Ashton Carter said on Friday.

World | Barack Obama

Carter, head of Pentagon acquisition, technology and logistics, said the success of the U.S. war in Afghanistan would depend largely on being able to get weapons and support services to the U.S. troops headed to the land-locked country, which he described as “the last place where you would like to be fighting a war.”

“This summer is going to be very critical. If we don’t get ourselves in there and get set … we can’t have success,” he told a conference hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies,

As part of that effort, Carter said he was increasing 20-fold the number of airships hovering over Afghanistan, providing “eyes in the sky” to troops on the ground.

Equipped with sophisticated cameras and the ability to stream images to U.S. bases on the ground, the airships would help track any activity that could jeopardize the troops, including the burying of roadside bombs.

At the same time, the very visible presence of the airships would keep potential attackers on their guard, Carter said, calling the airships a more affordable way to maintain surveillance than more expensive unmanned airplanes, which are also being deployed in Afghanistan in large numbers.

Carter did not name the airship maker, and Pentagon officials were not immediately available for comment.

South Dakota-based Raven Industries Inc last month said it had a tethered airship backlog of more than $10 million. It said the airships would be paired with surveillance equipment and deployed in Afghanistan.

Aria International, based in Virginia, also makes a helium-filled blimp equipped with infrared thermal cameras, and Lockheed Martin Corp has a larger version that it has been promoting to the military for years.

The unmanned airships will cut the need for risky on-foot missions by staying in the air much longer and feeding data to commanders through on-board cameras and sensors.

These sensors could also “rewind” after an explosion to find who planted the bomb and where they went.

Carter said the airships would be under the control of local forward operating bases, not commanders far away, making them a good tool on a fairly localized basis.

He said the Pentagon was also accelerating delivery of hand-held metal detectors and ground-penetrating radars, as part of an urgent drive to reduce the number of casualties from road-side bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

The military was also deploying about 1,000 new armored trucks built by Oshkosh Corp per month, double the initial rate, Carter said.

He said Defense Secretary Robert Gates had told him to “make sure that we are doing all we can do” to prevent the large number of IED-related troop deaths and injuries that marked the early years of the Iraq war.

The Pentagon was also examining several models of unmanned helicopters that could be used to get supplies to troops without using dangerous convoys on the road, he said.

At the same time the military is dramatically increasing its presence in Afghanistan, it was also dealing with the drawdown in Iraq, a major logistical challenge, Carter said.

He said the military had already removed 2.2 million pieces of military equipment from more than 350 forward operating bases in Iraq but needed to deal with 1.2 million more pieces by August, deciding if they should return to the United States, stay in Iraq or go elsewhere for use in future conflicts.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

Pentagon boosting Afghanistan “eyes in the sky”

(Reuters) – The Pentagon is focused on getting more trucks, surveillance equipment and other military equipment into Afghanistan to prepare for what will be a critical summer in the war, Defense Undersecretary Ashton Carter said on Friday.

World

Carter, head of Pentagon acquisition, technology and logistics, said the success of the war in Afghanistan would depend largely on being able to get weapons and support services to the U.S. troops headed to the land-locked country, which he described as “the last place where you would like to be fighting a war.”

“This summer is going to be very critical. If we don’t get ourselves in there and get set … we can’t have success,” he told a conference hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies,

As part of that effort, Carter said he was increasing 20-fold the number of airships hovering over Afghanistan, providing “eyes in the sky” to troops on the ground.

Equipped with sophisticated cameras and the ability to stream images to U.S. bases on the ground, the airships would help track any activity that could jeopardize the troops, including the burying of roadside bombs.

At the same time, the very visible presence of the airships would keep potential attackers on their guard, Carter said, calling the airships a more affordable way to maintain surveillance than more-expensive unmanned airplanes, which are also being deployed in Afghanistan in large numbers.

Carter did not say which airship model would be added.

Lockheed Martin Corp builds a 35-meter tethered helium-filled airship known as Persistent Threat Detection System that has been in use by the Army since 2004. Nine of the airships are being used in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Lockheed is building eight more airships under a $133 million one-year contract it won in October 2009, and is in talks with the Army about additional orders.

Another aerostat used by the military is made by Aerostar, a unit of South Dakota-based Raven Industries Inc, which last month said it had a tethered airship backlog of more than $10 million. It said the airships would be paired with surveillance equipment and deployed in Afghanistan.

The unmanned airships will cut the need for risky on-foot missions by staying in the air much longer and feeding data to commanders through on-board cameras and sensors.

These sensors could also “rewind” after an explosion to find who planted the bomb and where they went.

Carter said the airships would be under the control of local forward operating bases, not commanders far away, making them a good tool on a fairly localized basis.

He said the Pentagon was also accelerating delivery of hand-held metal detectors and ground-penetrating radars, as part of an urgent drive to reduce the number of casualties from road-side bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs).

The military was also deploying about 1,000 new armored trucks built by Oshkosh Corp per month, double the initial rate, Carter said.

He said Defense Secretary Robert Gates had told him to “make sure that we are doing all we can do” to prevent the large number of IED-related troop deaths and injuries that marked the early years of the Iraq war.

The Pentagon was also examining several models of unmanned helicopters that could be used to get supplies to troops without using dangerous convoys on the road, he said.

At the same time the military is dramatically increasing its presence in Afghanistan, it was also dealing with the drawdown in Iraq, a major logistical challenge, Carter said.

He said the military had already removed 2.2 million pieces of military equipment from more than 350 forward operating bases in Iraq but needed to deal with 1.2 million more pieces by August, deciding if they should return to the United States, stay in Iraq or go elsewhere for use in future conflicts.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

US confident Australia will stick with strike fighter

The chief weapons buyer for the United States Pentagon says he is confident Australia and seven other countries will all stick with the F-35 joint strike fighter project, despite cost blowouts and delays.

The Defence Department’s Ashton Carter gave a briefing for the media, a day after telling the US Congress it was unacceptable countries were being asked to pay more and wait longer for the joint strike fighter.

But Mr Carter is confident Australia will stay with the project.

“When we have the program on a realistic plan that everybody can see going forward, then Congress, as well as the military departments here and the international partners will stay with their plan, which is to equip their fleets with this aircraft.”

Australia has ordered 14 of the jets with an option for another 100.

Fighter jet program faces budget blowout

There has been more criticism of the Joint Strike Fighter program in the US, with concerns raised about budget blowouts and delays.

A report from a US congressional watchdog, the Government Accountability Office, says the cost of the program has increased by $46 billion and development is two-and-a-half years behind schedule.

Australia is planning to buy up to 100 of the F-35s but the report says there is a substantial risk that Lockheed Martin will not be able to build them on time.

US under-secretary of defence for acquistition Ashton Carter has told the Senate Armed Services Committee he knows the delays are unacceptable.

“We’re asking you to pay more than we said that you were going to have to pay. That’s unacceptable,” he said.

The chairman of the committee, Carl Levin, says it is a dismal outlook.

“The facts are painful, because you got a 60 to 90 per cent increase in the projected cost of each plane,” he said.

UPDATE 1-Gates sees movement soon on arms buyer nomination

(Adds quote, details)

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

FORT RUCKER, Alabama, April 14 (Reuters) – Defense
Secretary Robert Gates expects U.S. Senate movement soon on the
nomination of Ashton Carter as the Pentagon’s chief arms
buyer.

“I have every hope and expectation that Dr. Carter’s
nomination will be moved in the near future,” Gates told
reporters at Fort Rucker, home of the Army’s main site for
training pilots and unmanned aerial system operators.

The Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month
approved Carter’s nomination. But several senators have put a
hold on it, citing concerns about the delayed $35 billion
competition between Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC.N) and Boeing Co
(BA.N) to build 179 new aerial refueling tankers.

Gates said he hoped to move forward on the tanker
competition soon and would let lawmakers review the proposed
competition criteria and get their input before releasing
them.

He said he hoped a new tanker contract could be awarded by
early next year or next summer.

“They’re desperately needed by the Air Force,” he said.

Carter, a Harvard University professor and former assistant
secretary of defense for international security policy, was
nominated for the job of overseeing more than $100 billion in
annual U.S. arms purchases and a $70 billion research
enterprise. If confirmed by the Senate, Carter would replace
John Young as undersecretary of defense for acquisition,
technology and logistics.
(Editing by Andre Grenon)

RPT-UPDATE 3-Gates sees movement soon on arms buyer nomination

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

FORT RUCKER, Alabama, April 14 (Reuters) – Defense
Secretary Robert Gates said he expects U.S. Senate movement
soon on the nomination of Ashton Carter as the Pentagon’s chief
arms buyer.

“I have every hope and expectation that Dr. Carter’s
nomination will be moved in the near future,” Gates told
reporters at Fort Rucker, home of the Army’s main site for
training pilots and unmanned aerial system operators.

The Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month
approved Carter’s nomination. But several senators have put a
hold on it, citing concerns about the delayed $35 billion
competition between Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC.N) and Boeing Co
(BA.N) to build 179 new aerial refueling tankers.

Gates said he hoped to move forward on the tanker
competition soon, and would let lawmakers review the proposed
competition criteria and get their input before releasing the
terms of a revamped competition.

Gates questioned congressional moves to block Carter’s
nomination, especially since many lawmakers were pressing the
Pentagon to undertake acquisition reforms — a job that Carter
would largely oversee.

“At a time when most of the Congress believes there is a
need for acquisition reform in the Department of Defense, to
delay the confirmation of the person who is most needed in that
effort clearly is counter-productive,” Gates told reporters.

This will be the Air Force’s third attempt to replace its
aging fleet of KC-135 refueling planes, which are more than 50
years old on average.

Congress in 2004 killed the first bid after an Air Force
plan to lease and buy 100 Boeing 767s failed amid a major
procurement scandal.

The Air Force then held a new competition and awarded a $35
billion contract to Northrop and its European subcontractor,
Airbus parent EADS (EAD.PA), in February.

But Gates canceled the deal last fall after congressional
auditors found problems in the Air Force’s handling of the
competition, and the process became very politicized.

On Tuesday, Gates said he hoped that a new tanker contract
could be awarded by early next year or next summer. “They’re
desperately needed by the Air Force,” he said.

Gates, the only member of former President George W. Bush’s
cabinet who stayed on under President Barack Obama, reiterated
his opposition to buying more tankers each year and splitting
the procurement between the two companies.

He said that would increase logistics, training and
maintenance costs over the long run. Development costs alone
would likely double from $7 billion to $14 billion, he said.

Carter, a Harvard University professor and former assistant
secretary of defense for international security policy, was
nominated for the job of overseeing more than $100 billion in
annual U.S. arms purchases and a $70 billion research
enterprise. If confirmed by the Senate, Carter would replace
John Young as undersecretary of defense for acquisition,
technology and logistics.

Senators Jeff Sessions and Richard Shelby, both Republicans
of Alabama, where Northrop had planned to build its A330-based
tankers, have put a hold on the Carter’s nomination.

The senators say they have unanswered questions about how
open and transparent the next competition will be.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Gary Hill)

Gates sees movement soon on arms buyer nomination

FORT RUCKER, Alabama (Reuters) – Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he expects U.S. Senate movement soon on the nomination of Ashton Carter as the Pentagon’s chief arms buyer.

“I have every hope and expectation that Dr. Carter’s nomination will be moved in the near future,” Gates told reporters at Fort Rucker, home of the Army’s main site for training pilots and unmanned aerial system operators.

The Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month approved Carter’s nomination. But several senators have put a hold on it, citing concerns about the delayed $35 billion competition between Northrop Grumman Corp and Boeing Co to build 179 new aerial refueling tankers.

Gates said he hoped to move forward on the tanker competition soon, and would let lawmakers review the proposed competition criteria and get their input before releasing the terms of a revamped competition.

Gates questioned congressional moves to block Carter’s nomination, especially since many lawmakers were pressing the Pentagon to undertake acquisition reforms — a job that Carter would largely oversee.

“At a time when most of the Congress believes there is a need for acquisition reform in the Department of Defense, to delay the confirmation of the person who is most needed in that effort clearly is counter-productive,” Gates told reporters.

This will be the Air Force’s third attempt to replace its aging fleet of KC-135 refueling planes, which are more than 50 years old on average.

Congress in 2004 killed the first bid after an Air Force plan to lease and buy 100 Boeing 767s failed amid a major procurement scandal.

The Air Force then held a new competition and awarded a $35 billion contract to Northrop and its European subcontractor, Airbus parent EADS, in February.

But Gates canceled the deal last fall after congressional auditors found problems in the Air Force’s handling of the competition, and the process became very politicized.

On Tuesday, Gates said he hoped that a new tanker contract could be awarded by early next year or next summer. “They’re desperately needed by the Air Force,” he said.

Gates, the only member of former President George W. Bush’s cabinet who stayed on under President Barack Obama, reiterated his opposition to buying more tankers each year and splitting the procurement between the two companies.

He said that would increase logistics, training and maintenance costs over the long run. Development costs alone would likely double from $7 billion to $14 billion, he said.

Carter, a Harvard University professor and former assistant secretary of defense for international security policy, was nominated for the job of overseeing more than $100 billion in annual U.S. arms purchases and a $70 billion research enterprise. If confirmed by the Senate, Carter would replace John Young as undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.

Senators Jeff Sessions and Richard Shelby, both Republicans of Alabama, where Northrop had planned to build its A330-based tankers, have put a hold on the Carter’s nomination.

The senators say they have unanswered questions about how open and transparent the next competition will be.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Gary Hill)

Obama transition team told not to include Kashmir,India in Holbrooke’s mandate

Washington, Jan.27 (ANI): A high-level delegation from India is reported to have warned American foreign policy experts, including three officials who were part of the formal Obama transition team — that New Delhi might preemptively make Richard Holbrooke persona non grata if his mandate officially included India or Kashmir.

The warning was conveyed at an off-the-record Aspen Strategy Group meeting held at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, D.C. in early December, people familiar with the meeting said.

Among the Obama transition figures who attended the meeting, held as part of the Aspen Institute’s U.S. India Strategic Dialogue, were former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig; Kurt Campbell, the director of the Aspen Strategy Group who is expected to be named assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs; and former Pentagon official Ashton Carter, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School.

Obama administration officials, however, insist that no member of the transition team met with foreign governments or representatives of foreign governments during the transition.

One official said in an e-mail message that the Obama transition team did not have to be influenced to exclude India from Holbrooke’s official mission, because it was “not contemplated” for the South Asia envoy’s portfolio to have an Indian role.

According to the New York Times’, Holbrooke’s name as envoy for South Asia was doing the rounds as early as January 7.

“The notion of an envoy on Kashmir or that would include Kashmir came up as soon as Obama mentioned it,” one Washington South Asia expert not associated with any of the campaigns and who did not attend the dialogue, said on condition of anonymity.

“It was widely discussed by the 50 key South Asia watchers,” he added.

And while the Obama transition may not have met with any foreign governments or representatives of foreign governments in any official capacity, foreign governments including India’s did try to influence the future administration’s policy decisions by working the phones, meeting with Obama transition figures at the margins of conferences, at Washington receptions, and through third parties.

“The message was clearly conveyed by India to the Transition and received,” The Cable was told.

“It led to a change in how Richard Holbrooke’s mission was publicly described and unveiled.”

“There was a whole delegation of Indians who came through in early December through the Aspen dialogue,” he said.

“They were almost all former officials. They were interacting … with people in various capacities, in addition to formal meetings inside the government. They were all over this – what Holbrooke’s portfolio would be. The Indians were preemptively irate and were reacting in perhaps a disproportionate way” due to concerns that Holbrooke’s mandate might officially include India or Kashmir.

The National Security Council did not respond to messages left by Foreign Policy. (ANI)