Mexico praises decision on immigration law

(Reuters) – The Mexican government on Wednesday praised a U.S. judge’s decision to block key parts of a tough new immigration law that is poised to impact the large Mexican community in the U.S. state of Arizona.

Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa said the injunction from a U.S. district judge, which came the day before the controversial law was due to come into effect, was a “first step in the right direction.”

The Mexican government has repeatedly expressed concerns about the Arizona law, the toughest so far in the United States, that would require police officers to determine the immigration status of a person they detain or arrest if the officer believes the person was in the country illegally.

But U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton on Wednesday blocked several of the most controversial parts of the law — including a requirement for immigrants to carry identification papers at all times — to the relief of activists who said the measure was discriminatory.

Espinosa said Mexico was still concerned about the rights of Mexican citizens in Arizona and was stepping up consular protections in the border state, believed to be home to up to half a million illegal immigrants, many of them from Mexico.

Police across the desert state, which is the principal corridor for human and drug smugglers entering the United States from Mexico, have been preparing to implement the law, which comes into effect on Thursday.

“The Mexican government has implemented and will continue to strengthen actions to prevent the violation of immigrants’ rights,” Espinosa told a news conference in Mexico City.

The U.S. Justice Department had argued that provisions of the law, passed by the Republican-controlled Arizona Legislature three months ago, encroached on federal authority over immigration policy and enforcement.

(Reporting by Mica Rosenberg; editing by Missy Ryan and Sandra Maler)

Scenarios: What could happen with Arizona’s immigration law

(Reuters) – A judge in Arizona on Wednesday put key parts of the border state’s tough new immigration law on hold before it is due to come into effect on Thursday.

The U.S. Justice Department had argued provisions of the law encroached on federal authority over immigration policy and enforcement.

Here are some scenarios for what could happen next:

ARIZONA PLANS TO APPEAL

Arizona’s Republican Governor Jan Brewer said the state plans to file an expedited appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seeking to lift the injunction against the immigration law.

The appeals court, based in San Francisco, could consider whether to lift the injunction and let the full law go into effect or request legal briefs and arguments from both sides before ruling on Arizona’s request.

It was not clear how quickly Arizona would move to file its appeal. Regardless of how the appeals court rules, either side could then appeal that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. COURT HEARS FORMAL ARGUMENTS

While Judge Susan Bolton granted a preliminary injunction against the Arizona law, she did so on the grounds that she believes the Obama administration would ultimately succeed on the merits of the case when presented in court.

Therefore, Bolton would still need to hear arguments from both sides on the merits of the federal government’s challenge, requiring lengthy legal briefs, and likely hear oral arguments, a process that can take months.

Either side could then appeal to the Ninth Circuit and ultimately the Supreme Court.

CONGRESSIONAL ACTION

With the initial victory in hand, that could lead some lawmakers in the U.S. Congress to try to forge a compromise on a comprehensive immigration reform plan that has been elusive regardless of which political party holds the White House.

But the chances are slim that the Obama administration and lawmakers will reach a deal before November’s congressional elections in which Republicans are expected to make gains.

Republicans demand more effort to secure the southern border with Mexico and have said the initial deployment of National Guard troops to the border was inadequate.

Many Republicans also oppose giving amnesty to the nearly 11 million illegal immigrants believed to be in the United States to allow them to remain in the country.

Obama supports allowing undocumented immigrants in good standing to pay a fine, learn English and get on the track to citizenship. He also has supported tightening border security and clamping down on employers that hire undocumented workers.

STATE LEGISLATURE

With the ruling, the Arizona legislature could try to alter the law to address concerns raised by Judge Bolton. Arizona’s governor could call a special session to make those changes.

State lawmakers already have amended the immigration law once to try to prevent racial profiling. Under the changes, police will be required to investigate the immigration status of people they reasonably suspect are in the country illegally only in the case of lawful contact such as a traffic stop.

(Additional reporting by Tim Gaynor in Phoenix; Editing by John O’Callaghan)

Factbox: Judge’s ruling on key provisions of the Arizona law

(Reuters) – Following are the key parts of U.S. Judge Susan Bolton’s decision on Arizona’s tough new immigration law, prohibiting some provisions from taking effect while allowing other portions to enter into force.

The law goes into effect on Thursday.

PROVISIONS BLOCKED FROM TAKING EFFECT:

* Would have required that an officer try to determine the immigration status of a person who they have stopped, detained or arrested if they suspect the individual is in the country illegally; and would have required verification of the immigration status of an individual before the person is released from custody.

* Would have authorized the arrest of an individual where there is probable cause the person has committed a crime that would make them eligible for deportation.

* Would have created a criminal statute for failing to apply for or carry immigration registration papers.

* Would have created a criminal statute for an illegal immigrant to seek, apply or perform work.

PROVISIONS ALLOWED TO TAKE EFFECT:

* Makes it illegal for a person to stop their vehicle to pick up a day laborer and for such a worker to get into a motor vehicle if they are impeding traffic.

* Bars Arizona officials from limiting enforcement of federal immigration laws.

* Permits legal Arizona residents to sue any state official or agency for adopting a policy restricting the enforcement of federal immigration laws.

* Makes it a separate crime for a person to transport or harbor an illegal immigrant or to encourage or induce that individual to come to or to live in Arizona.

(Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington, Editing by Sandra Maler)

Analysis: Immigration ruling carries double-edged sword

(Reuters) – A U.S. judge’s ruling blocking key parts of Arizona’s immigration law could bolster President Barack Obama’s standing among Hispanics and energize Republican foes who back the tough law.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton weighed in on the festering American debate over illegal immigration that has implications for November 2 congressional elections.

* Obama’s Democrats could get a boost from Hispanics who have been disenchanted with his inability to advance an overhaul of the U.S. immigration system. The Hispanic vote is expected to be increasingly important in the years ahead.

Negotiations between the White House and the congressional leadership have gone nowhere on the potent political issue of immigration and the issue is considered dead for the year.

Both Democrats and Republicans have tried to attract Hispanics to their parties and thus far Democrats have largely won the battle.

But Obama’s approval rating among Hispanics in a recent Gallup poll was at 52 percent, his lowest rating with them after reaching the 60s earlier this year.

* On the flip side, the ruling may well generate further enthusiasm among Republican voters who are already energized ahead of November 2 elections in which Democratic control of the U.S. Congress is at stake.

Republicans have used the Obama administration’s effort to strike the Arizona law as a rallying point. The Republicans’ conservative base is leery of any immigration legislation that could be perceived as granting amnesty to the estimated 10.8 million immigrants living illegally in the United States.

Many Americans who are weary of a 9.5 percent jobless rate back the Arizona law and could be disappointed by the judge’s ruling, which was prompted by a lawsuit filed against Arizona by Obama’s Justice Department.

A CNN/Opinion Research poll this week showed that a majority of the country back the Arizona immigration law — 55 percent of those questioned favored it compared to 40 percent against it.

* Immigration is a volatile issue in Washington. Battle lines are drawn between Democrats, who want a system of documenting illegals to allow them to work in addition to improved border security, and Republicans, who mainly want tougher border enforcement.

Obama has been challenging both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill to offer him bipartisan proposal on immigration in recognition that any overhaul would not pass without Republican votes.

Senator John McCain of Arizona is well aware of the potency of the issue. He led efforts to overhaul immigration three years ago and the issue nearly unraveled his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.

Defeated by Obama in 2008, McCain has been a strong backer of the Arizona law in trying to face down a primary challenge to his re-election from conservative former congressman J.D. Hayworth.

(Editing by Howard Goller)

Mexican migrants still wary after Arizona law ruling

(Reuters) – A judge’s decision to block key parts of a tough immigration law in Arizona on Wednesday did little to encourage Mexicans who say rising xenophobia in the United States is their worst enemy.

Even as the Mexican government praised U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton’s ruling as a step in the right direction, people in the city of Nogales, across the border from Arizona, accused U.S. authorities of deporting them for doing jobs shunned by Americans.

“You can feel the repression, the hatred against us on U.S. streets,” said Javier Mendez, a Mexican who had a job washing dishes in Oregon until he was deported this week. “I went to visit my mother in Tucson and they threw me in prison and took me away from my family.”

In recent years, the U.S. Border Patrol has heightened surveillance as it seeks to stem the flow of drugs, weapons and illegal immigrants across the porous Mexican-U.S. border.

Federal, state and local authorities are using legislation and beefed-up enforcement to target many of the nearly 11 million illegal immigrants believed to be living across the United States.

Bolton’s ruling freezes sections of the law, passed by Arizona’s Republican-controlled legislature three months ago, that would have given police the power to investigate anyone reasonably suspected of being an illegal immigrant and made it a crime not to carry identification papers.

As Arizona Governor Jan Brewer vows an appeal, the fate of the controversial law is uncertain as it was due to take effect on Thursday.

“We know that even with the ‘no’ to the law the feeling of xenophobia has grown and that won’t go away with one judge’s ruling,” said Rafael Hernandez, director of a migrant rights group in Tijuana, across from San Diego, California.

Polls show the law is backed by a solid majority of Americans and by 65 percent of Arizona voters. Opposition by many Americans to illegal immigration has built support for copycat efforts in at least 20 other states.

“It is not just the law we are protesting, it is the hate that goes with it,” said Sergio de Alba, a Mexican farm leader who spoke at a protest on Wednesday in Mexico City.

Illegal immigrants complain they are summarily rounded up in raids by U.S. law enforcement, forced to abandon their families and deported to dangerous Mexican border cities with no money. Some of them have spent most of their lives in the United States and barely speak Spanish.

BETTER PAY

Many Hispanics in the United States voted for President Barack Obama in hopes he could usher in reforms and provide a path to legal residency for illegal immigrants.

While the Obama administration opposed Arizona’s new law, the president has been unable to win support from Republicans for immigration reform, battling against the perception that foreigners are swarming the border and taking American jobs.

Spiraling violence in Mexico, where President Felipe Calderon is battling increasingly bold drug cartels, has increased calls for tighter controls on the border.

Despite a weak U.S. economy, many Mexicans dream of working in the United States, where they can often earn more in a single hour than they can in a whole day’s work at home.

Arizona is the principal corridor for smugglers moving illegal immigrants into the United States.

But undocumented immigrants face more controls than they did before the September 11 attacks on the United States by al Qaeda militants in 2001. Workplace raids have become more common in central and northern U.S. states.

“I was put in a U.S. prison along with murderers and criminals with 25-year sentences,” said Jose Antonio Lopez, who was deported to Nogales last week after being arrested in Las Vegas. “All I did wrong was cutting someone’s lawn.”

(Additional reporting by Lizbeth Diaz in Tijuana and Caroline Stauffer in Mexico City; Writing by Robin Emmott; Editing by Missy Ryan and John O’Callaghan)

UPDATE 7-Key parts of Arizona anti-immigration law blocked

PHOENIX, July 28 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Wednesday blocked key parts of Arizona’s tough new immigration law hours before it was to take effect, handing a victory to the Obama administration as it tries to take control of the issue.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer said she would file an appeal to reinstate the provisions, which had popular support but were opposed by President Barack Obama and immigration and human rights groups.

“This fight is far from over,” Brewer said, adding that “at the end of what is certain to be a long legal struggle, Arizona will prevail in its right to protect our citizens.”

The Republican-controlled state legislature passed the law three months ago to try to drive nearly half a million illegal immigrants out of Arizona and stem the flow of human and drug smugglers over the border from Mexico.

The provisions blocked by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton included one that required a police officer to determine the immigration status of a person detained or arrested if the officer believed the person was not in the country legally.

Bolton also halted provisions requiring immigrants to carry their papers at all times and making it illegal for people without proper documents to tout for work in public places.

Immigration as an issue has festered in U.S. politics for years and attempts to overhaul the system have failed, most recently in 2007 when Republicans torpedoed reforms pushed by George W. Bush, then the Republican president.

The ruling is a significant victory for Obama, who wants to break the deadlock with Republicans to pass a comprehensive immigration law tightening border security and giving millions of illegal immigrants a shot at legal status — an already difficult task before November’s congressional elections.

There are an estimated 10.8 million illegal immigrants in the United States, a country of more than 300 million people.

The Justice Department had argued provisions of the Arizona law, which goes into effect on Thursday, encroached on federal authority over immigration policy and enforcement.

In her 36-page decision, Bolton agreed, finding “the United States is likely to suffer irreparable harm” if her court did not block the selected parts of the law.

“The number of requests that will emanate from Arizona as a result of determining the status of every arrestee is likely to impermissibly burden federal resources and redirect federal agencies away from the priorities they have established,” she said.

COULD GO TO SUPREME COURT

Bolton kept some parts of the law, including provisions making it illegal for drivers to pick up day laborers off the street and to transport or harbor an illegal immigrant.

Brewer said her state “will soon file an expedited appeal” with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Arizona can appeal ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court. In that case, it could embroil the cash-strapped desert state in a protracted and costly legal battle.

“There are no winners here,” said Representative Ann Kirkpatrick, an Arizona Democrat who faces a tough battle for re-election in November. “No matter what the courts ultimately decide, we will still have wasted millions of dollars and our borders will still not be secure.”

John McCain and Jon Kyl, Arizona’s Republican U.S. senators, said they were “deeply disappointed” by the ruling and took aim at Obama for failing to provide resources to secure the state’s porous border with Mexico.

“Instead of wasting taxpayer resources filing a lawsuit against Arizona … the Obama administration should have focused its efforts on working with Congress to provide the necessary resources to support the state in its efforts to act where the federal government has failed,” their statement said.

McCain, a Republican moderate, faces a tough challenge in the party’s state primary election from former congressman J.D. Hayworth, a conservative who is hawkish on border issues.

About three dozen Hispanic activists at an open-air mass outside the state capitol in central Phoenix jumped up, hugged and wept as news of Bolton’s ruling broke.

“I think that our efforts have paid off,” said Dulce Matuz, a college graduate who has lived in Arizona without papers for a decade, adding activists would carry on fighting to overturn the rest of the law.

The Mexican government hailed the ruling as a “step in the right direction.” Around 100 activists cheered and chanted “Yes we can” and “No to xenophobia” as news of the ruling reached a rally outside the U.S. embassy in Mexico City.

“WIND OUT OF SAILS”

Peter Spiro, a law professor at Temple University and a former attorney in the State Department, said he was not surprised the more controversial parts of the law were halted.

“I expect those provisions will never go into effect, though this is only a preliminary order,” Spiro said.

“I also think this will take the wind out of the sails of anti-immigration efforts on the state level, though it will probably intensify such efforts at the federal level.”

Polls show the Arizona law is backed by a solid majority of Americans and 65 percent of the state’s voters. It is inspiring copycat efforts in at least 20 other states.

Obama supports allowing illegal immigrants in good standing to pay a fine, learn English and get on track to citizenship. He also has supported tightening border security and clamping down on employers that hire undocumented workers.

Opponents of the Arizona law say it will lead to harassment of Hispanic or Hispanic-looking Americans. Thousands were headed to Phoenix for protests on Thursday, when the law takes effect, and street rallies were planned across the country.

Police arrested four activists late on Wednesday, after they scaled a crane in downtown Phoenix and unfurled a banner reading “Stop the Hate.” They faced trespassing charges, a police spokesman said.

Police across Arizona, the main corridor for human and drug smugglers entering the United States from Mexico, have been preparing to implement the law. The state’s 15,000 officers have had training on how to identify people they suspect are unlawfully in Arizona without resorting to racial profiling.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, known for his tough approach to illegal immigrants in the Phoenix area, said he would push ahead with plans for a crime and immigration sweep on Thursday regardless of limitations placed on the law.

“It’s business as usual for this sheriff’s office,” Arpaio said. “All these protesters coming here from everywhere and the local critics aren’t going to change the way Arizona or this sheriff will fight our illegal immigration problem.” (Additional reporting by Carolina Madrid in Phoenix, Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington, Caroline Stauffer and Missy Ryan in Mexico City; Editing by John O’Callaghan)

ImpreMedia Launches Special Coverage of Arizona SB 1070

LOS ANGELES–(Business Wire)–
ImpreMedia, the number one Hispanic news and information company in the U.S. in
online and print, announced that all of its properties will publish a
comprehensive, multimedia package covering the new Arizona law SB1070 beginning
today, Sunday, July 25, 2010.

The Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act also known as SB
1070, takes effect July 29, 2010 and has sparked national controversy and
debate.

“There is both information and misinformation about Arizona SB 1070. As a
trusted source, we feel it is important to provide the Hispanic community with a
clear explanation about the law, the impact on our community and what to do if
you encounter yourself faced with the law,” stated Hilda Garcia, VP of
Multi-platform News and Information. “Beyond that there is a human element; how
it has affected people as individuals and families. We put a face and a voice to
the people the law impacts.”

The multimedia package is available on all of ImpreMedia`s digital properties
allowing Hispanics across the nation access to the information. The coverage
includes the impact and effects on Latino families, immigration, security and
the economy. It features videos, slideshows, testimonial, statistics, a
chronology of the law and a forum where people can voice their opinion about the
law. Special coverage will also be published in ImpreMedia`s newspapers,
starting today and continuing throughout the upcoming weeks.

Starting on Sunday, July 25, 2010 the coverage can be found at:

www.laopinion.com/arizona-sb1070

www.eldiariony.com/arizona-sb1070

www.laraza.com/arizona-sb1070

www.rumbonet.com/arizona-sb1070

www.elmensajero.com/arizona-sb1070

www.laprensafl.com/arizona-sb1070

www.hoynyc.com/arizona-sb1070

www.impre.com/arizona-sb1070

About ImpreMedia

ImpreMedia (http://www.impremedia.com) is the No. 1 Hispanic News and
Information Company in the U.S. in Online and Print. ImpreMedia`s multi-platform
offerings range from Online to Video, Widgets, Social Media, Mobile, Audio and
Print and encompass 97 products on 7 platforms, including the portal
www.impre.com and its McClatchy partner. 31% of all U.S. Hispanic adults use an
impreMedia network product. The network is also the nation`s largest Hispanic
newspaper publisher with newspapers in the top 7 U.S. Hispanic markets, reaching
16 markets total and representing 61% of the U.S. Hispanic population. Its
leading publications include La Opinión in Los Angeles and El Diario La Prensa
in New York. ImpreMedia portals and publication websites are: www.impre.com,
www.imprerewards.com, www.lavibra.com, www.impreautos.com, www.laopinion.com,
www.eldiariony.com, www.hoynyc.com, www.laraza.com, www.laprensafl.com,
www.elmensajero.com, www.rumbonet.com, www.vistamagazine.com, and
www.contigola.com.

ImpreMedia, LLC was formed in 2004 as the first ever national Spanish-language
print and digital news and information company in the United States targeting
the growing Hispanic population. ImpreMedia originally combined the forces of La
Opinión and El Diario/La Prensa, the leading Spanish-language daily newspapers
in Los Angeles and New York. ImpreMedia is backed by a private investment group
led by Clarity Partners, Halyard Capital, ACON Investments, and the Lozano
family. Clarity Partners is a private equity firm based in Los Angeles, managing
over US$1 billion and focused on the media, communications, and business
services sectors. Halyard is a private equity firm based in New York, with over
$600 million of capital under management focused on investing in education,
information and marketing Services, communications and media companies. ACON
Investments is a diversified private equity firm based in Washington, D.C., with
more than $400 million of capital under management. ACON has portfolio
investments in the United States, Latin America and Europe. The Lozano family
originally founded La Opinión, and have owned and/or operated La Opinión for
almost 85 years.

ImpreMedia LLC
Mary Zerafa, 213-896-3600 or 562-754-2500
mary.zerafa@impremedia.com

Copyright Business Wire 2010

Nebraska town latest to fight illegal immigrants

Mo (Reuters) – Voters in a small Nebraska town on Monday added to an anti-immigration sentiment sweeping parts of the United States, voting to ban the hiring or renting of property to illegal immigrants.

U.S.

An estimated 57 percent of voters in the eastern Nebraska community of Fremont voted in favor of the ban, according to unofficial results of the referendum in the town of about 25,000 people.

Supporters of the measure said it was needed to compensate for a lack of federal law enforcement of immigration violations, but opponents said the law could fuel discrimination and threatened litigation if it passed.

Potential renters would need to apply for a license, and through the application process Fremont officials could check to see if the prospective renters had legal status.

Also, the ordinance requires businesses to verify employees have legal status to work.

The move in Nebraska highlights the deep rift over immigration ahead of congressional elections this November.

It comes on the heels of passage of an Arizona law that requires state and local police to determine the status of people if there is “reasonable suspicion” that they are illegal immigrants, and to arrest those who are unable to provide documents proving they are in the country legally.

The Arizona measure, which also makes it a crime to transport someone who is an illegal immigrant and to hire day laborers off the street, is widely considered the toughest measure taken by any U.S. state to curb illegal immigration.

The Obama administration has said it will challenge the Arizona measure.

(Reporting by Carey Gillam, editing by Vicki Allen)

Nebraska town latest in US to fight illegal immigrants

Mo, June 21 (Reuters) – Voters in a small Nebraska town on Monday added to an anti-immigration sentiment sweeping parts of the United States, voting to ban the hiring or renting of property to illegal immigrants.

An estimated 57 percent of voters in the eastern Nebraska community of Fremont voted in favor of the ban, according to unofficial results of the referendum in the town of about 25,000 people.

Supporters of the measure said it was needed to compensate for a lack of federal law enforcement of immigration violations, but opponents said the law could fuel discrimination and threatened litigation if it passed.

Potential renters would need to apply for a license, and through the application process Fremont officials could check to see if the prospective renters had legal status.

Also, the ordinance requires businesses to verify employees have legal status to work.

The move in Nebraska highlights the deep rift over immigration ahead of congressional elections this November.

It comes on the heels of passage of an Arizona law that requires state and local police to determine the status of people if there is “reasonable suspicion” that they are illegal immigrants, and to arrest those who are unable to provide documents proving they are in the country legally.

The Arizona measure, which also makes it a crime to transport someone who is an illegal immigrant and to hire day laborers off the street, is widely considered the toughest measure taken by any U.S. state to curb illegal immigration.

The Obama administration has said it will challenge the Arizona measure. (Reporting by Carey Gillam, editing by Vicki Allen)

Shakira fights Arizona’s anti-immigration law

London, April 30 (ANI): Colombian singer Shakira is protesting a new tough immigration law in Arizona, United States.

According to AZCentral.com, the 33-year-old singer met with the mayor of Phoenix, Phil Gordon and other government officials at City Hall to talk about the controversial law, reports The Daily Express.

If an immigrant does not have a proof of a legal residency in Arizona, he is found guilty and committing a criminal offence under the law. The police have been ordered to any person suspicious of residing illegally.

“She is in town to talk to the Mayor about the harmful effects of this bill,” City of Phoenix spokeswoman Debra Stark said. (ANI)