The story behind failed Times Square bomber’s turn to extremism

New York, May 16 (ANI): It was not a sudden spurge of anger against the west, particularly the United States, or an abrupt shift towards radical thoughts that forced Faisal Shahzad, the confessed Times Square bomb plotter of Pakistani origin, to take such an extreme step, but the process of him seeking answers for the killing and sufferings of thousands of fellow Muslim men has started almost after the 9/11incident.

Though Shahzad understood the notion that Islam forbids the killing of innocents, an e-mail that he had sent to his friends in February 2006 clearly suggested that he was struggling with the ‘trial and pathetic conditions’ of Muslims the world over.

“Those who insist only on “peaceful protest, can you tell me a way to save the oppressed? And a way to fight back when rockets are fired at us and Muslim blood flows?” Shahzad wrote in his lengthy mail to his friends.

Even though he enjoyed a great life in the US, having a nice paying job and a happy family, his relatives, and friends said that his argument with American foreign policy grew after 9/11,and the mails, which are now in possession of investigators, written to his colleagues and some close pals, also suggest the same.

According to The New York Times, which interviewed many of Shahzad’s friends, relatives and colleagues, Shahzad became more religious around 2006. His friends recalled that by that year he was also turning away from the Pakistan of his youth, distancing himself from the liberal, elite world of his father, Bahar ul-Haq, a retired vice marshal in the Pakistani Air Force.

In the recent years, Shahzad’s financial condition weakened to an extent and he reportedly struggled to pay his bill, but it’s unclear whether that played any role in his radicalisation.

Shahzad’s father-in-law, M.A. Mian, is in complete shock over what he has seen in the past fortnight.

What drove Shahzad to such an extreme, was it political, religious or personal, even Mian is seeking answers.

“We all know these things, what the geopolitical problems are. Every day we sit in our living rooms with our friends and we discuss these issues,” the paper quoted Mian, as saying.

“But to go to this extreme, this is unbelievable. He has lovely children. Two really lovely children. As a father I would not be able to afford to lose my children,” he added.

One of graduates of Shahzad’s high school in Karachi, who spoke of conditions of anonymity, pointed out that Shahzad came of age during Pakistan’s state-sponsored jihad against India in Kashmir.

“We used to see the mujahedeens as heroes. When I look back, I think, ‘What was I thinking? What were we all doing?’ But in that era, it made sense. We all wanted to do something,” he said.

“He was always very upset about the fabrication of the W.M.D. stunt to attack Iraq and killing non-combatants such as the sons and grandson of Saddam Hussein,” the newspaper quoted one of Shahzad’s close relatives. (ANI)

‘Pakistanis hate Americans from their soul’

New York, Aug.20 (ANI): The United States is trying hard to change the mindset of the Pakistanis regarding its policies, but it seems that all such efforts have hardly had an effect.

During an interview recently, the new US Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Judith McHale was at the receiving end of flak showered at her by a Pakistani journalist, Ansar Abbasi.

Abbasi, who is known for his criticism of American foreign policy, told McHale that even though America is offering huge humanitarian aid to Islamabad, people in Pakistan still have same disregard for it that used to be there earlier.

“You should know that we hate all Americans. From the bottom of our souls, we hate you,” McHale quoted Abbasi, as saying.

“He told me that we were no longer human beings because our goal was to eliminate other humans,” McHale said recounting her conversation with Abbasi.

“He spoke English very well, and he said that thousands of innocent people have been killed because we are trying to find Osama bin Laden,” she added.

The Obama Administration has been trying vigorously to build bridges between America and the Muslim world, The New York Times reports.

US Special Envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke’s fifth consecutive visit to the region since being appointed on the post in January this year highlights America’s concerns, but American officials including Holbrooke and McHale have certainly discovered that it is ‘not going to be easy’.

Meanwhile, McHale has said that stationing US Marines in Islamabad was a routine affair and Pakistanis should not be worried about it.

“A small number of US Marines would be deployed in the Islamabad embassy, which is a ‘routine matter’ and it must not be a cause for concern for Pakistani people,” McHale said.

She added the US was focused on efforts to expand its relations with Pakistan and intended to fulfill its commitments with the people of the country.

“The expansion of US assistance to Pakistan in the years ahead requires more personnel in our embassy as we are going to assist Pakistan in various fields of economy,” McHale said. (ANI)

Bill Clinton believes US foreign policy is doing well under Obama

Virginia (US), May 14 (ANI): Former US President Bill Clinton believes American foreign policy is being managed well by the Obama administration, and does not give much value to criticisms of it by former Vice -President Dick Cheney.

At a campaign event for Virginia gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe, Clinton said he disagreed with Cheney’s assertion that Obama’s foreign policies have made the nation less safe.

“I like this new approach. I think it will serve us well,” he said, referring to the administration’s diplomatic outreach to countries that were isolated by Bush officials.

In a round of media appearances, Cheney has criticized the Obama administration on a number of issues, including releasing memos detailing Bush-era enhanced interrogation techniques.

Asked whether he was surprised by Cheney’s criticisms, Clinton said: “He feels very strongly about it. I think that the president and secretary of state will prove to have better aim in foreign policy.” (ANI)