No bail for dog-loving assault accused

A 25-year-old Scullin man charged with assault has applied for bail on the grounds that he needs to look after his two dogs.

David John Welch and four co-offenders are accused of assaulting a group of men with a baseball bat, a metal pole and a machete in March.

The court heard the three alleged victims were drinking at a house in Giralang when the group attacked them.

They all suffered head injuries.

Welch’s mother told the ACT Magistrates Court that her son needed to be released from custody so he could look after his two dogs.

She said the older pet frets without him and she would not like to see the dog die while her son was in custody.

In refusing bail, Magistrate Maria Doogan said she was amazed that the application had been made on those grounds and told Welch’s lawyer he had wasted the court’s time.

Police set up Hey Dad! strike force

Police have set up a strike force team to investigate allegations of indecent assault made against Hey Dad! star Robert Hughes.

Sarah Monahan, who played Hughes’s on-screen daughter on the Channel Seven show from 1987 to 1994, has told media outlets that he touched her inappropriately.

Hughes, who now lives in Singapore, has strenuously denied the allegations.

Today it was announced that detectives have formed Strike Force Ruskin to examine the claims.

They say they will interview alleged victims and witnesses but warn that it will be a protracted investigation.

Earlier, police said they were likely to take a statement on the allegations later today.

A police spokesman said a statement was most likely to be taken from Monahan at an undisclosed location.

Last week, police said they had begun to collate material relating to the matter but an official complaint had yet to be made.

Vatican slams media over allegations Pope helped cover up sex abuse

London, Mar 27 (ANI): The Vatican has slammed the media over allegations that the Pope helped cover-up sex abuse, saying that the claim was an “ignoble” attempt to strike at the Pontiff.

The Catholic Church has been hit by a series of child abuse allegations across Europe and the US over the past few months, and in a strongly worded defence of Pope Benedict XVI, they insisted there was no cover-up in the case of Father Lawrence Murphy, reports the Daily Express.

Claims of a cover-up had been made against the now deceased Father Murphy, who is alleged to have abused 200 boys at an American school for the deaf between 1950 and 1974.

Reports in the US on March 25 claimed that the Pope, who was then Cardinal Ratzinger, failed to act on warnings about Father Murphy from Milwaukee.

The Vatican denied a “cover-up” and said he only became aware of the case “much later, when the priest was already old and ailing”.

On March 26 it accused the media of a smear campaign, with the official newspaper L’Osservatore Romano labelling the reports as an “ignoble attempt to strike at Pope Benedict XVI and his collaborators at any cost”.

Several alleged victims have come forward. Arthur Budzinski said he was abused from the age of 12 when he asked Father Murphy to hear his confession.

Steven Geier said Father Murphy molested him as a 14-year-old, using God to justify his actions.

The allegations surfaced years ago, but received new attention this week when court documents showed he was not defrocked in the 1990s as he was protected by the Vatican office led by the now Pope. (ANI)

Patient’s daughter testifies at Patel trial

The daughter of a man who died after undergoing surgery by Jayant Patel has testified at the doctor’s manslaughter trial in Brisbane.

Patel, 59, the former chief of surgery at Bundaberg hospital, has pleaded not guilty to unlawfully killing three patients and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

One of his alleged victims was Mervyn Morris, 75, who died three weeks after surgery in 2003 from a combination of factors including malnutrition.

His daughter Vicki Whitfield has testified at Patel’s Supreme Court trial about her father’s deteriorating health after the operation.

Ms Whitfield told the court she spoke to Patel about his plan to perform the major bowel operation.

“I asked him if he could possibly be bleeding from anywhere else, maybe the liver? He said ‘no’,” she said.

“He wanted to do a bowel resection. We thought that was pretty dramatic.

“We asked if that would stop the bleeding and he said ‘yes’.”

Patel allegedly told Ms Whitfield her father would be out of hospital in a week.

Instead, Mr Morris died an undignified death three weeks later, vomiting faeces that were aspirated into his lungs in his final hours.

Ms Whitfield told the court her father had been unable to eat after the operation, so she had asked Patel if she could bring him energy-rich drinks.

But he got worse, so she said she made another suggestion to Patel.

“We asked him, ‘could he have a feed tube?’ He couldn’t drink the Sustagen, he was really struggling,” she said.

She told the court, Patel agreed about the feeding tube.

“Dr Patel also said that he thought Dad would have been better by now,” she said.

“He thought he would have been over it in a couple of days but because of his age he wasn’t coping with it very well.”

The court has heard that along with the operation itself, poor post-operative nutrition was also listed on Mr Morris’s death certificate as a causal factor.

But Ms Whitfield told the court that when she raised concerns that her father’s feeding tube was not working properly, Patel pulled it out of his nose a bit and was optimistic it would be OK.

On the morning her father died, Ms Whitfield told the court: “I asked Dr Patel, ‘how come it’s got to this point that my father is in the ICU?’

“‘[He] looks like he’s dying, how did it get this bad?’”

She said Patel replied: “When I was putting the tube down, your father was vomiting, so he would have got some into his lungs. But we’ve given him some medication to fix that.”

The prosecution says Patel performed unnecessary and negligent surgery at a hospital not equipped to handle such major operations.

The trial has heard x-ray services were so lacking at the hospital that some reports were not available until after one of Patel’s patients had died.

Dr Emma Igras worked under Patel at the hospital in 2003.

Under cross-examination this morning from Patel’s counsel, Dr Igras told the court that during her time at the hospital, radiology services were “absent at times, delayed often”.

The court was shown a number of x-ray documents that showed there were long delays before doctors received reports from radiologists about their patients’ diagnostic x-ray pictures.

In one instance it was more than two months.

The court has also heard that Patel had restrictions placed on his licence in the US because of gross negligence, but staff at Bundaberg were unaware of this.

Patel has been quiet throughout the trial.

He enters court each morning holding his wife’s hand and does not respond to any questions from reporters.

The trial continues.

Pope accountable for hiding priest abuses – U.S. victim

Pope Benedict should be held accountable for doing nothing about a Wisconsin priest who was accused of sexually abusing as many as 200 boys at a Milwaukee school for the deaf, one of his victims said on Thursday.

Arthur Budzinski, a 61-year-old Milwaukee printer who is deaf, spoke through his daughter, Gigi, about how his “innocence was stolen from him” by the accused abuser, Rev. Lawrence Murphy, who died in 1998 at age 72.

“The pope knew about this. He was the one who handled the sex abuse cases. So, I think he should be accountable, because he did nothing,” Gigi Budzinski said at a news conference held outside the Milwaukee Archdiocese’s offices.

Murphy worked at the school from 1950 to 1974.

A lawyer bringing a lawsuit on behalf of five alleged victims published on his firm’s website internal church documents detailing the church’s responses to the case.

In 1996, Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland wrote a letter citing Murphy’s abuses to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, then the Vatican’s top doctrinal official and now Pope Benedict.

The archbishop did not receive a reply.

As the U.S. church took steps to try Murphy in secret in 1998, as directed by the Vatican office, the priest appealed directly to Ratzinger. Murphy asked to be left alone, saying he was in ill health having suffered a stroke, and had repented acts committed years earlier, according to the documents.

The Vatican office halted the investigation.

‘FESS UP’

Mark Salmon, a member of a group of victims of sexual abuse by priests, said the issue was “where it belongs, and that’s at the Vatican’s doorstep.”

“Ratzinger can have all of the colonels and lieutenants he wants falling on their swords for him, but eventually he has to fess up, and that’s what I hope happens,” Salmon said.

An editorial in the Vatican newspaper on Thursday, responding to a New York Times report about the Murphy case, angrily attacked the media over its reporting of sexual abuse of children by priests.

There was “clearly an ignoble attempt to strike at Pope Benedict and his closest aides at any cost,” it said. “There was no cover-up in the case of Father Murphy.”

Budzinski said he and other victims of Murphy’s sexual advances met in 1974 with former Milwaukee Archbishop William Cousins, who did not believe them and yelled at them.

“He left there, and he was crying, because he couldn’t believe that the archbishop would do that to him. He thought that he would take his side, and he didn’t,” Gigi Budzinski said of her father, who became depressed and lost his faith.

Budzinski said he took his complaints to the police but he said detectives questioned and then released Murphy, who denied the accusations.

A Milwaukee police spokeswoman said the department had no record on file of any such complaint.

Documents attributed to church officials showed that Murphy — who knew sign language — would enter the school’s dormitory and ask boys to join him in confession, “instructing” them in sex education.

He asked boys he molested about their sexual contacts with others, got the names of those boys and molested them. He molested boys at his mother’s vacation cottage and on trips.

Murphy admitted to the church that he had molested boys, according to the documents.

Wisconsin church officials warned the Vatican about the probability that Murphy’s acts would become public and create a scandal. One victim was paid a $70,000 settlement.

Murphy was buried in his priestly vestments, over the objections of some of his victims.

U.S. Roman Catholic archdioceses have collectively paid some $2 billion in settlements to victims since the priest sex scandals first erupted in Boston some eight years ago.

(Writing by Andrew Stern; Editing by Eric Beech)

Police wait for Hey Dad! complaints

Police say no official investigation is underway into claims of sexual abuse on the set of Australian TV comedy Hey Dad!

Former child star Sarah Monahan last week told a woman’s magazine a man on the show inappropriately touched her and exposed himself to her.

Actor Robert Hughes, who now lives in Singapore, was on Wednesday night named by the Nine Network as the alleged perpetrator.

Hughes has vehemently denied the allegation and his legal team has been in contact with NSW Police.

A Current Affair reported that other women had come forward with claims similar to Monahan.

But commander of the NSW Sex Crimes Squad, Detective Superintendent John Kerlatec, says an official investigation into the matter will not proceed until the alleged victims contact police.

“Our information is based on what’s in the media. I’ve had no direct contact – and neither has anyone else in NSW Police – with any of the victims,” he said.

“If victims make contact with police it’ll be taken in strict confidence.”

He added: “Investigators are collating this information … and if there’s a witness to be interviewed those investigators are ready.”

Detective Superintendent Kerlatec says he is “confident” the alleged victims will contact police in coming days.

“I have an expectation they’ll come forward,” he said.

“It’s based on small pieces of information that have come towards me today that we’ll hopefully be able to arrange to meet and speak with these people.”

Monahan played Hughes’s on-screen daughter Jenny Kelly.

Hey Dad! aired from 1987 to 1994 on the Seven Network.

Victoria Police deny Indian bashing cover-up

Melbourne, Sep.16 (ANI): Victoria Police has denied they had a plan to limit publicity about the bashing of four Indian men outside a Melbourne pub on Saturday night.

Four men were arrested in relation to assault and affray, but they were released pending further investigations.

Police believe a fifth man may also have been involved in the bashing outside a pub at Epping in Melbourne’s east.

Details of the incident only emerged publicly today, prompting an outraged Indian media to claim Victoria Police had been involved in a cover-up.

Police said the Indian media were made aware of the incident via “other channels”.

Acting Senior Sergeant Glenn Parker said there was no cover-up, although he did admit the police media department would have known about the incident in the early hours of Sunday morning.

“Unfortunately, this type of incident occurs regularly. This is really treated no differently to any other event of this type. There has been no deliberate attempt to suppress it. It’s just part of normal procedure. It’s attracted more media attention than anticipated,” news.com.au quoted him, as saying.

According to the police, the four men were playing pool on Saturday night at a bar in High St, Epping, when a female hurled a racist remark at them.

The men left not long after but were followed into a car park by up to four males who were part of a larger group celebrating a birthday in the bar’s function room.

It has been alleged the Indian men were set upon and seriously assaulted by the group of males.

Police were called and arrested four males, who were interviewed in relation to assault and affray. ll four were released pending further investigations.

While only four men were arrested, one of the alleged victims told ABC Radio today that more than 70 people could have been involved.

He said the attackers didn’t use weapons, but racism was behind the incident.

“Definitely racism,” he said.

Police say that when the arrests were made, a group of about 15 men and women, who had been celebrating a birthday, directed racist abuse at the Indian men.

As the victims were escorted away by police, officers allege the larger group continued its “threatening behaviour and racist remarks”. (ANI)

REFILE-Judge rules Madoff can be pushed into bankruptcy

NEW YORK, April 10 (Reuters) – Victims of Bernard Madoff may be allowed to push the swindler behind a purported $65 billion Ponzi scheme into bankruptcy, a federal court judge ruled on Friday.

Despite objections from federal prosecutors, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC, U.S. District Court Judge Louis Stanton ruled that the alleged victims may go after Madoff’s assets that were not proceeds from his crimes.

The judge, of the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, said the U.S. bankruptcy code is the best and most experienced system to deal with the claims against Madoff’s assets, excluding those that prosecutors may force him to forfeit as proceeds from a crime.

“A Bankruptcy Trustee has direct rights to Mr. Madoff’s individual property, with the ability to maximize the size of the estate available to Mr. Madoff’s creditors through his statutory authority to locate assets, avoid fraudulent transfers and preserve or increase the value of the assets through investment or sale,” Stanton wrote in his opinion.

Madoff has pleaded guilty to masterminding Wall Street’s biggest ever investment swindle, involving as much as $65 billion in client funds. He could be ordered to prison for the rest of his life when sentenced in June. (Reporting by Ilaina Jonas; Editing by Jan Paschal)

UPDATE 1-Judge rules Madoff can be pushed into bankruptcy

(adds newspaper story on $790 million in fees earned by firms)

NEW YORK, April 10 (Reuters) – Victims of Bernard Madoff may be allowed to push the swindler behind a purported $65 billion Ponzi scheme into bankruptcy, a federal court judge ruled on Friday.

Despite objections from federal prosecutors, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC, U.S. District Court Judge Louis Stanton ruled that the alleged victims may go after Madoff’s assets that were not proceeds from his crimes.

The judge, of the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, said the U.S. bankruptcy code is the best and most experienced system to deal with the claims against Madoff’s assets, excluding those that prosecutors may force him to forfeit as proceeds from a crime.

“A Bankruptcy Trustee has direct rights to Mr. Madoff’s individual property, with the ability to maximize the size of the estate available to Mr. Madoff’s creditors through his statutory authority to locate assets, avoid fraudulent transfers and preserve or increase the value of the assets through investment or sale,” Stanton wrote in his opinion.

Madoff has pleaded guilty to masterminding Wall Street’s biggest ever investment swindle, involving as much as $65 billion in client funds. He could be ordered to prison for the rest of his life when sentenced in June.

Separately, firms that sent investors’ money to Madoff took in $790 million in fees and investors and authorities are trying to recover the money, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Banco Santander SA (SAN.MC), one of the biggest so-called “feeders” to Madoff, earned $52.7 million in investment manager’s fees in 2007 and $43.3 million in 2006, the newspaper said in a story posted on Friday on its website.

Fairfield Greenwich Group, which was the biggest feeder fund, may have earned $400 million from 2005 to 2008 based on a lawsuit against the company filed by Massachusetts securities regulators, the newspaper said. (Reporting by Ilaina Jonas; Editing by Jan Paschal)

Judge rules Madoff can be pushed into bankruptcy

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Victims of Bernard Madoff may be allowed to push the swindler behind a purported $65 billion Ponzi scheme into bankruptcy, a federal court judge ruled on Friday.

Despite objections from federal prosecutors, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC, U.S. District Court Judge Louis Stanton ruled that the alleged victims may go after Madoff’s assets that were not proceeds from his crimes.

The judge, of the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, said the U.S. bankruptcy code is the best and most experienced system to deal with the claims against Madoff’s assets, excluding those that prosecutors may force him to forfeit as proceeds from a crime.

“A Bankruptcy Trustee has direct rights to Mr. Madoff’s individual property, with the ability to maximize the size of the estate available to Mr. Madoff’s creditors through his statutory authority to locate assets, avoid fraudulent transfers and preserve or increase the value of the assets through investment or sale,” Stanton wrote in his opinion.

Madoff has pleaded guilty to masterminding Wall Street’s biggest ever investment swindle, involving as much as $65 billion in client funds. He could be ordered to prison for the rest of his life when sentenced in June.

Separately, firms that sent investors’ money to Madoff took in $790 million in fees and investors and authorities are trying to recover the money, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Banco Santander SA, one of the biggest so-called “feeders” to Madoff, earned $52.7 million in investment manager’s fees in 2007 and $43.3 million in 2006, the newspaper said in a story posted on Friday on its website.

Fairfield Greenwich Group, which was the biggest feeder fund, may have earned $400 million from 2005 to 2008 based on a lawsuit against the company filed by Massachusetts securities regulators, the newspaper said.

Amnesty accuses Austrian police of racist practices

Vienna – Austrian police and judicial authorities are plagued by “institutional racism” and treat people according to skin colour, the human rights watchdog Amnesty International concluded in a report presented on Thursday.

The problem was not only that 55 per cent of alleged victims of ill-treatment by police were foreigners or of foreign origin, according to the study.

A wider issue was racial profiling practiced by police, Heinz Patzelt, the head of Amnesty’s Austrian chapter, told reporters in Vienna.

Law enforcement officers were quick to suspect foreigners – especially people from African countries – and to treat them more violently during police operations, he suggested.

“The result is clear: That is racial discrimination,” Patzelt said.

In a recent case, Mike Brennan, a US black citizen, was allegedly mistreated and injured in February, as Vienna police mistook him for a drug dealer and wrestled him to the ground.

Last week, the case of an Austrian of Sudanese origin made the headlines, as it was revealed that the mentally disabled man was taken into police custody in Vienna in March and was almost sent back to Sudan because he was not able to identify himself.

Although the man’s parents had told police their 21-year-old son was missing, he spent eight days behind bars.

Besides these cases of maltreatment and profiling, Austrian authorities often do not properly deal with racist attacks, according to the study’s author John Dalhuisen.

“In such cases, people with dark skin colour do not receive the same service, the same protection as whites,” he said.

Amnesty did not compile statistics comparing Austria to other European countries, but Dalhuisen said that the problem did not only affect Austria.

Among the steps that should be taken to remedy the situation, the study recommended new legislation and procedures to deal with racist police officers.

The union of police officers reacted promptly, saying that subjecting police to stricter rules than those applying to all public servants was unnecessary and would amount to “discrimination of our colleagues.”

If no steps were taken, Dalhuisen said, migrants living in Austria would get the feeling that they are forced to live outside of the law’s boundaries.

“This sense of alienation surely does not help with integration and peaceful coexistence,” he said. (dpa)

Delhi University students to join Anand Jon’s kin to seek justice

New Delhi, Mar 19 (ANI): Students of Delhi University have joined family members of fashion designer Anand Jon, who has been convicted in the US for sexually assaulting budding models, in a demonstration aimed at demanding justice for him.

Holding banners and posters, the students raised slogans seeking justice for Jon, who is languishing in a Los Angeles jail.

A silent candle light march was also taken out pray for his speedy trial here last evening.

Before organising the protest, Jon’s relations had sought the Indian Government’s intervention.

“He has been convicted for a crime which he has not done. We have been praying to everyone that the truth should come out and that he should get his freedom. Now, he is languishing in jail for the past two years.

There is no justice at all because he hasn’t got his right to get a bail there. So, this is a violation of a person’s human right and civil rights,” said Shashi Abraham, Jon’s mother.

She also termed the sexual assault charges against her son as ‘racist’ and also claimed that a fashion designer of Indian origin has been defamed.

The family has now presented a ‘witness’, a US-based model named Lauren Boyette, who claimed that Jon was the victim of a ‘conspiracy’ hatched by one of his alleged victims.

Boyette, who also took active part in the protest march, said: “The cops, the prosecution and the detectives in America are threatening me. And all of the witnesses trying to help Anand. So, I decided to step up.”

A court in Los Angeles convicted the 34-year-old designer, who dressed celebrities like Janet Jackson and Paris Hilton, in November last on charges of 16 criminal counts, including sexually assaulting would-be models.

Family members of Jon have petitioned to various NGOs, Human Rights groups and even the Government in USA and India which till now seem to have been futile.

Jon has been in jail for the last two years after being arrested in the US on March 6, 2007, on charges of rape and sexual harassment of more than a dozen models. (ANI)

Relatives of Anand Jon to launch “Satyagraha”

New Delhi, Mar 17 (ANI): Relatives of Indian fashion designer Anand Jon, convicted of sexually assaulting budding models, sought Indian Government’s intervention, saying that Jon was denied justice in the US.

Jon’s mother and sister are in India to drum up support for the ‘Free Anand Jon’ campaign before a crucial April 1 hearing at a Los Angeles court on defence arguments that he deserves a re-trial on the grounds of “prosecutorial and juror misconduct.”

“Our government should ask President Obama why this happened in spite all the evidence proving Jon innocent. We will launch “Satyagraha” just like Mahatma Gandhi and fght for justice. I will fight for Jon’s case till my last breath,” said Sanjana Jon, Jon’s sister.
Friends and well-wishers of Jon will stage a march before the US embassy in New Delhi on Wednesday in support of the demands.

“I want justice for my son. I want you to be there in this fight. This is fight for freedom for an innocent person. Jon has proved his innocence in the court. But, I doubt whether we will get justice in America,” said Shashi Abraham, Jon’s mother.

The 34-year-old designer, who dressed celebrities like Janet Jackson and Paris Hilton, was convicted by a Los Angeles Superior Court jury in November on 16 criminal counts, including sexually assaulting would-be models.

The family presented a “witness”, a US-based model named Lauren Boyette, who claimed that Jon was the victim of a “conspiracy” by one of the alleged victims. (ANI)

Accused Indonesian serial killer publishes book

Jakarta – An Indonesian man on trial for allegedly killing 11 people in a case that has captivated the country has published a book about his life, his attorney said Wednesday.

Kasman Sangaji – attorney for Verry Idham Henyansyah, better known as Ryan – said 20 copies of his client’s book have been printed and the publisher had agreed to print 5,000 more soon.

“The book is like an autobiography. It tells stories from his childhood until he ended up in prison,” Kasman said, adding that there was no law in Indonesia banning a criminal suspect from publishing a book.

Police arrested Ryan in July after finding the body of a man suspected of being his last murder victim in Jakarta.

The bodies of 10 people whose murders were also blamed on Ryan were later found buried behind his parents’ home in East Java province.

Ryan is facing a possible death sentence if found guilty of the murders, which took place within a two-year period.

Ryan’s book has triggered protests from the family of Ryan’s lover, Noval Andreas, who was jailed for 10 months in December for using money stolen from one of Ryan’s alleged victims because it contains a chapter on the men’s love affair.

Kasman dismissed the objections.

“Novel is a grown-up man, and he is responsible for his own actions,” the lawyer said.

Some of the proceeds from the book will be donated to charities, Kasman added.

Ryan has told reporters that he also planned to release an album of pop songs, saying he had been offered a recording contract by a producer.

His case received intense media coverage for weeks last year. Gay rights advocates have accused the media of anti-homosexual hysteria by linking the murders to the suspect’s sexuality.

Police said the motive for the murders was money. The victims included a woman and her 3-year-old daughter whom police said were hit by a crowbar. (dpa)

Defence picking out police errors in Anand Jon Case

Los Angeles, Oct 27 : The defence in Indian fashion designer Anand Jon’s multiple sexual assault case is mainly targeting at discrepancies and errors made by police investigators.

The defence mentioned many fallacies in the police investigation after the prosecution rested its case against Jon on October 15.

One of the victims, Stacy F, had earlier said in her testimony that when she went to Jon’s apartment, he had grabbed her around the waist and attempted to kiss her.

However, in a recent testimony, Police officer Adam Stahnke of the San Luis Obispo Police Department stated that in his report, Stacy F said that Jon’s attempted kiss was the “only” physical contact, and that she had never told him that Jon had tried to touch her thigh.

According to indiawest. com, Stahnke said that the last words written in his report were: “No crime committed.”

Learden Matthies, a senior criminologist with the Los Angeles County Sheriff”s Department, testified that the DNA testing on swabs provided by Jessica B., another alleged victim gave no indication one way or the other if sex between her and Jon had not been consensual.

Holly G., one more alleged victim, had told the court earlier that after Jon had sexually assaulted her, she had been invited to take a trip for AIDS Awareness to India with Jon”s sister Sanjana, and later worked for Jon as his assistant.

However, Beverly Hills police officer Nicole Cranham’s recent testimony has revealed that her report had no mention of the trip to India nor did it mention that Holly G. went to an art show and an AIDS event with Jon after her return from India.

Also, Beverly Hills detective George Elwell, a veteran investigating crimes against persons, confessed that during his investigation he had asked the alleged victims he spoke with if they ever any contact of any kind with Jon after he allegedly assaulted them.

Many of the alleged victims had admitted on the stand that they had had contact with Jon after they had been allegedly sexually assaulted, but Elwell”s investigation contains no phone records or any indication that he had pursued any leads provided by them regarding phone or e-mail contact.

He also denied of finding any GHB, the date rape drug that allegedly had been used on Holly G, in Jon”s apartment. (ANI)