Hezbollah expects many indicted over Hariri killing

(Reuters) – The leader of Lebanon’s powerful Hezbollah group said Sunday he expected many members of his group would be indicted by a U.N. investigation into the killing of former prime minister Rafik al-Hariri.

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the United Nations tribunal, which he has condemned as an “Israeli project,” was likely to issue several waves of indictments against Hezbollah, which has denied any involvement in Hariri’s 2005 assassination.

“We are the ones against whom the accusation is made, and it’s not three (members),” Nasrallah said.

“A few days ago Lebanese security officials said the first indictment would be three, then after a while five, then the third (group) 20 and the fourth 50,” he told a Hezbollah gathering by video link.

Indictment of Hezbollah members for Hariri’s killing would put severe strains on Lebanon’s unity government, which is led by Hariri’s son Saad and includes Hezbollah ministers.

Nasrallah’s criticism of the U.N. tribunal earlier this month led to heated exchanges between Hezbollah allies and supporters of Hariri, who have strongly supported the international investigation.

President Michel Suleiman held four days of talks last week with political leaders to try to calm tensions, which echoed the deep divisions which led the country to the brink of renewed civil war in 2008.

CHANGED TESTIMONY

In his latest attack on the U.N. tribunal, Nasrallah said investigators had not even tried to find out why several witnesses changed their testimony.

Evidence from one witness, Hosam Taher Hosam, initially implicated officials from Syria — a main backer of Hezbollah — but he later withdrew his testimony. The reliability of another, Syrian witness Mohammed Zuhair al-Siddiq, has been questioned.

Nasrallah said the fact that the U.N. investigation had not established why the witnesses changed their minds, or who might have been behind their original testimony, showed it was “not qualified to find the truth.”

“What do we suggest? Form a Lebanese commission, or parliamentary or judicial or ministerial or security commission to summon the witnesses … to ask them: Who led you? Who taught you? Who fabricated this for you?” Nasrallah said.

Last year the chief U.N. tribunal judge released four senior, pro-Syrian Lebanese officers after they had been held for four years without charge, saying that several witnesses had modified or retracted their original statements.

The U.N. investigation into Hariri’s killing first implicated Syrian and Lebanese officials, although it later held back from giving details of its findings.

Saad al-Hariri, who initially blamed Syria for his father’s death, has since tried to ease tensions with Syria and has made several trips to Damascus to meet President Bashar al-Assad. Syria has denied any involvement in Hariri’s killing.

ANALYSIS – Syria seeks room to manoeuvre in harsh region

Syria, a middling Arab country formally at war with Israel over the occupied Golan Heights, must juggle its alliances to survive in a volatile Middle East.

Threats of a new conflict have ricocheted between Syria, Israel, Iran and Lebanon this year, especially after Israeli and U.S. talk of alleged Syrian arms transfers to Lebanese Hezbollah fighters, although leaders on all sides deny they want a fight.

Impatient with the United States, but keeping the door ajar, President Bashar al-Assad is clinging to an Iranian-led “resistance” camp, while signalling readiness to resume indirect peace talks with Israel via Turkey, a former foe turned friend.

“We cannot wait any longer,” he told Italy’s La Repubblica newspaper this week. “President (Barack) Obama’s America had raised expectations regarding a new Middle East policy. But now the clock of history is striking a new hour.”

Syria was now forging a regional order with Russia as well as Turkey and Iran, rather than relying on Western powers.

“This is not a turnabout,” said Assad, who has ruled Syria for nearly 10 years. “We want good relations with Washington. Rather it is about recognising reality: the failure by America and Europe in solving the problems of the world, in our region.”

Whether any new alignment will have better luck remains to be seen — even Assad acknowledged that the United States would play a decisive role in the final stage of any peace settlement.

Syria has emerged from the isolation it endured after the 2005 assassination of Lebanese statesman Rafik al-Hariri. It denied responsibility but was forced to pull its troops out of Lebanon after an outcry led by Washington, Paris and Riyadh.

SLOW GOING

Obama’s “engagement” with Syria has proved frustrating for both sides — Congress has yet to confirm a U.S. ambassador to Damascus named in February after a five-year hiatus. Obama has renewed sanctions on Syria, while easing some in practice.

Some Syrians view the glass as half-full.

“The American school is about to re-open, the ambassador has been named, there have been high-level visits from U.S. officials and a blind eye to some of the sanctions,” said Sami Moubayed, a historian. “Relations are nowhere as bad as they were under George W. Bush. Are we in a honeymoon? Not yet.”

Reviled as an “evil-doer” by Obama’s predecessor Bush, Syria has calmed some Western concerns about its behaviour in the region, just as the intended U.S. troop pullout from Iraq has assuaged some Syrian fears about Western militarism.

“Their external isolation is reduced,” a Western diplomat said. “It’s not that Syria has done nothing. Across the regional issues there has been limited progress in all areas.”

Ticking them off, he said Damascus had re-set relations with Lebanon after improving ties with Saudi Arabia. The flow of foreign militants into Iraq had all but ceased as U.S. pullout plans crystallised. Syria clearly wanted a stable, unified Iraq.

Turkish-mediated talks with Israel had made progress until the Gaza war halted them in December 2008. Syria had neither helped nor hindered U.S.-led efforts on the Palestinian track.

“Where concerns remain is weapons transfers to Hezbollah — real concerns about that — and to a lesser extent the relationship with Hamas, although Syria isn’t seen as a primary supplier of weapons in that case,” the diplomat said.

For Syria, the end-goal of any U.S. engagement is the return of the Golan Heights, captured by Israel in 1967, Moubayed said.

“A credible, sustainable deal needs the United States. So far Obama has been helpless at moving that track forward. You need to jump-start talks on the Golan,” he declared.

Prospects for renewing indirect talks via Turkey seem dim after Turkish criticism of Israeli policy in recent months.

“The Turks and Syrians are ready, but the Israelis aren’t. They say the Turks are no longer impartial,” Moubayed said.

Instead, Syria and Israel have been talking more of war than peace, although for now neither seems to want a confrontation.

INFLUENCE IN LEBANON

In Lebanon, arena of a 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah war, Syria’s allies have effective veto power in the government. Hariri’s son Saad has visited Damascus twice as Lebanese prime minister.

That alone indicates how much influence Syria has regained in the neighbour it dominated during its 29-year troop presence.

“In Lebanon, Syria has never been this close to having a full house,” said Peter Harling, the International Crisis Group’s Syria analyst, citing a spectrum of relationships.

Apart from its warm ties with Shi’ites through Hezbollah, Syria can manage Lebanon’s Sunni community via Hariri and the Saudis, and has won over key Christian leaders, as well as Druze chieftain Walid Jumblatt, once its bitterest critic.

Syria has made such gains without heeding U.S-Israeli pressure to ditch its alliances with Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas.

Assad mingles with Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah as easily as he does with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan and the Emir of Qatar.

“Syria is trying to keep one foot in the resistance camp and one in this more pragmatic camp in the middle,” Harling said.

“Its strength lies in its ability to juggle relationships and the ambiguity and ambivalence of its foreign policy.”

(Editing by Samia Nakhoul)

Time coming for sanctions against Iran, says Merkel

(Reuters) – German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Monday the time has come to impose new sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear activity.

World

“I have made clear that we are entering a phase where there should be sanctions against Iran,” Merkel told a joint news conference with Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri.

Iran had rejected all constructive offers from foreign governments to resolve the dispute over its uranium enrichment activities, she said.

Western nations suspect Iran wants to use atomic technology to build a bomb, but Tehran denies that and says it is only interested in civilian power generation.

Western powers want the U.N. Security Council to approve a resolution imposing new sanctions on Tehran but is facing some resistance from China.

Some EU officials have said they need to be prepared to move rapidly to implement their own measures to rein in Iran’s nuclear program if attempts to win U.N. backing drag on for too long.

(Reporting by Hans-Edzard Busemann; Editing by Angus MacSwan)

I did not say ‘special death squad’ made by Cheney killed Benazir: Hersh

Lahore, May 19 (ANI): US journalist Seymour Hersh has contradicted news reports being published in South Asia that quote him as saying a “special death squad” created by former US vice president Dick Cheney had killed Benazir Bhutto.

The award-winning journalist described as “complete madness” the reports that the squad headed by General Stanley McChrystal, the new commander of US Army in Afghanistan, had also killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafique Al Hariri and a Lebanese Army Chief.

“Vice president Cheney does not have a death squad. I have no idea who killed Hariri or Bhutto,” Hersh said.

“I have never said that I did have such information. I most certainly did not say anything remotely to that effect during an interview with an Arab media outlet,” the Daily Times quoted Hersh, as saying.

He said General McChrystal had run a special forces unit that engaged in “high value target activity”, but “while I have been critical of some of that unit’s activities in the pages of the New Yorker and in interviews, I have never suggested that he was involved in political assassinations or death squads on behalf of Cheney, as the published stories state.”

Hersh regretted that none of the publications had contacted him before carrying the report.

“This is another example of blogs going bonkers with misleading and fabricated stories and professional journalists repeating such rumours without doing their job – and that is to verify such rumours.” (ANI)

US journo claims Bhutto was killed on Cheney’s orders

New York, May 18 (ANI): A special death squad assassinated Pakistan’s former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the orders of former US Vice-President Dick Cheney, an Arab TV channel has reported.

“Cheney was the chief of the Joint Special Operation Command and he cleared the way for the US by exterminating opponents through the unit and the CIA. General Stanley was the in-charge of the unit,” The Nation quoted US columnist Seymour Hersh, as saying.

The US death unit killed Bhutto because she had told Al-Jazeera TV about the assassination of Osama Bin Laden, Hersh said.

The US leadership did not want Osama to be declared dead. It would have raised questions about the US Army’s presence in Afghanistan, he claimed.

According to Hersh, the former Lebanese PM Rafique Al Hariri and the army chief were murdered for not safeguarding US interests and for refusing to set up US military bases in Lebanon.

Ariel Sharon, the then prime minister of Israel, was also a key man in the plot, he said. (ANI)

Lebanon must reform economy, on “short leash” – PM

Lebanon’s new government must send the right signals on economic reform regardless of who wins a June general election, Prime Minister Fouad Siniora said on Sunday, warning that the debt-laden state was “operating on a short leash”.

Siniora also told Reuters his government was seeking to accelerate implementation of new infrastructure projects to boost confidence in an economy forecast to grow by 4 percent this year despite a global slowdown.

“In the coming two years, we have at least $3 billion worth of projects that are going to be executed,” he said.

A former finance minister, Siniora is a close ally of billionaire politician Saad al-Hariri, who heads an alliance of factions that hope to defend their parliamentary majority from an opposition coalition led by the Iran-backed Hezbollah.

Siniora’s cabinet has enjoyed financial and political backing from many Western and Arab governments.

He said Lebanon’s new administration would have to immediately “send the right messages to the world” on the economy. Lebanon has one of the heftiest public debt burdens in the world.

“Because if they don’t send the right messages, then definitely they will be speculating at a time that Lebanon cannot afford to have a speculative type of thinking,” said Siniora, prime minister since 2005.

“It is very important to send the right messages that can inspire confidence about the prudent policies… that we are committed to reform,” Siniora said. “There is no other way, other than adopting the same policies.”

Siniora has sought to move ahead with major reforms, including the sale of two state-owned mobile phone firms. The sale, initially held up by a political crisis, has now been postponed because of poor market conditions.

Reforms are seen as vital to putting Lebanon’s public finances on a sustainable path.

Privatisation proceeds are to be used to pay off some of the public debt, which stood at some $47 billion in December, equivalent to around 160 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). The ratio was as high as 180 percent in 2006.

“This tells you how much progress we have managed to achieve,” Siniora said. The next government must respect the existing approach to debt management. “That’s how things are going to be done. Otherwise it is not in the interests of the Lebanese,” he said.

Moody’s Investors Service last week upgraded Lebanon’s credit ratings, citing a “substantial improvement” in the country’s external liquidity and the “proven resistance” of the public finances to shocks.

“SUBSTANTIAL INFLOW OF CAPITAL”

Lebanon will need to borrow more this year to finance a total deficit projected at some $4 billion. Siniora said there was progress towards resolving a dispute that has held up approval of the 2009 budget, which has a deficit equal to around 12 percent of GDP.

“The Lebanese economy and the Lebanese financial system can very much finance this deficit,” Siniora said. There were no current plans for extra foreign currency borrowing, he added.

The domestic banking sector, whose deposit base has been boosted by expatriate remittances, is a main financier of the state.

Siniora said Lebanon was “still witnessing a good and substantial inflow of capital”, registering a balance of payments surplus of some $700 million in January and February.

Lebanese working in oil-exporting Gulf states, where growth has slowed dramatically, had not suffered major lay-offs, he said. Lebanon’s economy is expected to grow by 4 percent in 2009 — around half the rate of 2008.

To boost confidence, the government was looking to speed up implementation of projects valued at more than $1.4 billion including road construction and water, sewage and electricity infrastructure development, Siniora said.

Financed by loans from institutions including the World Bank and Arab development funds, the projects would complement others already in progress and bring the total value of projects to be executed in the next two years to $3 billion.

To attract investment, the government was also advertising the relative stability Lebanon is enjoying after suffering shocks including a war with Israel, assassinations, bomb attacks and internal unrest. “You name it. We were running things under the most difficult times,” he said.