‘Worried’ Zardari looking at ‘scapegoats’ to stay ‘safe’ in BB murder probe?

Islamabad, May 5 (ANI): Confusion prevails over whether the fact finding committee formed by the Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani to probe former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s assassination has submitted its report or not.

While Cabinet Secretary Rauf Chaudhry, who is heading the three-men committee, said the report has been submitted to Gilani, a statement issued by the Presidency said the committee is likely to question some more important personalities before finally submitting its report.

Earlier, some quarters of the media said the fact-finding committee has given a clean chit to former Military Intelligence (MI) chief Major General Nadeem Ijaz over hosing down the incident site where Bhutto was assassinated.

Observers said that the reported acquittal of Ijaz and other subordinates has irked Zardari and other senior Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leaders, and they are deliberately trying to delay the probe report.

The committee has been given an extension to submit its report, which many believe is a move to find scapegoats in the case.

Insiders said Zardari was critical about the findings of the committee, which eventually led to a change in its mandate. It has now been directed to complete its findings in the light of UN Commission’s report.

According to some political analysts, one of the primary reasons of Zardari’s annoyance over the findings of the committee was that all fingers would be pointed towards himself if lower rank officials continue to get clean chits in Bhutto’s murder case.

“Now when most of the suspects mentioned in the UN report have been interrogated by the fact finding committee and most of them had been cleared, the blame of assassination of Benazir Bhutto at the end of the day would directly come on the President,” The Nation quoted an observer, as saying.

“ Naturally, he should be the most worried person if the committee fails in finding some scapegoats,” he said.

It is pertinent to mention here that fact finding committee did not fix criminal responsibility on any of the senior police officials, including former city police officer (CPO) of Rawalpindi, Saud Aziz, who was held directly responsible for washing off the crime scene by the UN commission’s report.

The committee’s report contradicted the UN commission’s findings, saying that on the basis of given statements and evidences, the committee has reached the conclusion that the police washed the crime scene outside Liaquat Bagh in Rawalpindi without any pressure or any order from higher authorities. (ANI)

26/11 case: Nikam says he will challenge acquittal of co-accused

Mumbai, May 3 (ANI):Mumbai’s Chief Public Prosecutor, Ujjwal Nikam who argued the mammoth 26/11 case for over 271 working days, on Monday gave a mixed reaction to the Special Court’s verdict on lone surviving Pakistani terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab.

On Monday, a Mumbai special court delivered 1,522 page verdict convicting Kasab on all 86 charges, including waging war against India.

However, in an unexpected move, the court found two Indian co-accused– Faheem Ansari and Sabauddin Ahmed – not guilty and said they must be acquitted of all charges due to lack of evidence.

The court said the evidence against the two was weak both in “quality as well as quantity.”

Nikam said he would appeal against the acquittal of Ansari and Ahmed.

The charges against Kasab include waging war against India, murder, abetting to murder, attempt to murder, violation of the Arms Act, Explosives Act, the Unlawful Activity Prevention Act (UAPA) and others.

Nikam said, that while he is satisfied with the larger portion of the judgement, he was not happy with the acquittal of the co-accused.

He claimed that the prosecution has presented enough and credible evidences against these two.

“We have presented a good case and many credible evidences against Faheem Ansari and Sabauddin Ahmed and Ansari himself admitted to the crime,” Nikam said.

We will certainly appeal against the judgement,” he added.

He also informed that many maps were recovered from Ansari’s possession during investigation and were presented before the court.

Nikam said on the basis of bullets found in Kamte’s body it was established that it was fired from Abu Ismail’s Ak 47 assault rifle.

But in case of Karkare and Salaskar, it could not be identified, he added.

Nikam said, the court appreciated the work of photojournalists and the railway announcer.

Photographs of Kasab shot by photojournalists Sebastian D”souza and Sriram Vernekar were also placed before the court.

At the CST station on the 26/11 night the announcer saved many lives.

While, arguing the case Nikam submitted 1,015 articles seized during investigations and filed 1,691 documents to support the case.

Judge Tahaliyani recorded 3,192 pages of evidence after examining 658 witnesses on 271 working days.

Thirty witnesses in the court identified Kasab as the man who had opened fire on them.

Nikam had also argued that Pakistan”s security apparatus was used by the terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.

In his verdict Judge Tahiliyani described the 26/11 attacks as clear act of war.

For the first time in Indian judicial history, it was established in a court of law that Pakistan was involved in an act of terrorism and of waging war against India.

Judge Tahiliyani said the way the ten terrorists countered the elite National Security Guards (NSG) it clearly established that they were trained to fight a war.

Though no direct evidences were mentioned against Lashkar-e Taiba leader Hafiz Saeed and Zakir –ur –Rehman, the court found them guilty based on Kasab’s confessional statement.

The prosecution also tabled CCTV footage of the terrorists moving about with guns and firing at people.

The images were captured on CCTV cameras fitted at CST Railway Station, the Times of India building, and the Taj Mahal and Oberoi Hotels.(ANI)

Jessica murder case: Family hails Supreme Court verdict

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): Sabrina Lall, the sister of murdered model Jessica Lall, on Monday expressed satisfaction and happiness over the Supreme Court upholding Delhi High Court’s verdict in convicting all accused.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma on April 29, 1999, at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant, which was owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi.

Interacting with media after the Supreme Court order, Sabrina said: “After 11 years…I am glad that the final door has been closed on this case. It has given us a lot of relief and satisfaction that the Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the high court. I am happy.”

An apex court bench consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swatanter Kumar upheld the Delhi High Court judgment on Monday.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court had convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Sharma who is serving a life sentence in Tihar jail challenged his conviction and life sentence given by the Delhi High Court.

Sabrina described the apex court”s decision as a triumph for a common family.

“When the accused were acquitted by the lower court, that was a time that I had lost hope…In these cases where high profile and powerful people are involved, the important message is that it is not an impossible fight. If society works together and we continue to fight and don”t lose hope, it is not impossible to get the conviction…There is justice in the world and it”s possible not only for me, but for all those families fighting for it,” Sabrina said.

“In this case, middle-class people came out together in peaceful support. They created a movement for justice for Jessica. There are people I don”t even recognise who came out in open support,” she added.

Sabrina also demanded that witnesses be permitted who had turned hostile.

“Punishment to hostile witness should work as a deterrent in society. They will keep lying unless somebody is held accountable for the same,” she said. (ANI)

Jessica murder case: Family hails Supreme Court verdict

New Delhi, Apr 19 (ANI): Sabrina Lall, the sister of murdered model Jessica Lall, on Monday expressed satisfaction and happiness over the Supreme Court upholding Delhi High Court’s verdict in convicting all accused.

Lall was shot dead by Manu Sharma on April 29, 1999, at the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant, which was owned by socialite Bina Ramani in South Delhi.

Interacting with media after the Supreme Court order, Sabrina said: “After 11 years…I am glad that the final door has been closed on this case. It has given us a lot of relief and satisfaction that the Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the high court. I am happy.”

An apex court bench consisting Justices P. Sathasivam and Swatanter Kumar upheld the Delhi High Court judgment on Monday.

On December 18, 2006, reversing the order of acquittal recorded by the trial court, the Delhi High Court had convicted Sharma and awarded him a life sentence.

The High Court also declared two other accused in the case — Vikas Yadav and Amarjeet Singh Gill — guilty for destruction of evidence.

They have also challenged their conviction and four-year jail sentence.

Sharma is the son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma while Yadav is the son of Uttar Pradesh politician D.P. Yadav.

Sharma who is serving a life sentence in Tihar jail challenged his conviction and life sentence given by the Delhi High Court.

Sabrina described the apex court”s decision as a triumph for a common family.

“When the accused were acquitted by the lower court, that was a time that I had lost hope…In these cases where high profile and powerful people are involved, the important message is that it is not an impossible fight. If society works together and we continue to fight and don”t lose hope, it is not impossible to get the conviction…There is justice in the world and it”s possible not only for me, but for all those families fighting for it,” Sabrina said.

“In this case, middle-class people came out together in peaceful support. They created a movement for justice for Jessica. There are people I don”t even recognise who came out in open support,” she added.

Sabrina also demanded that witnesses be permitted who had turned hostile.

“Punishment to hostile witness should work as a deterrent in society. They will keep lying unless somebody is held accountable for the same,” she said. (ANI)

DPP appealing against Kizon acquittal

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has lodged an appeal against a judge’s decision to acquit Perth businessman, John Kizon, and an associate, of insider trading charges.

Mr Kizon and Nigel Mansfield stood trial earlier this year, accused of using knowledge not publicly available to trade in millions of shares in two companies.

Mr Kizon was found not guilty of all charges by the judge at the end of the prosecution case.

Mr Mansfield was also acquitted by the judge of most of the charges against him … and a jury later found him not guilty on another four counts.

Mr Kizon’s lawyers were notified of the appeal on Friday, when documents were also lodged with WA’s Court of Appeal.

Prosecutors launch appeal against Pires

Lawyers have confirmed that public prosecutors in East Timor have appealed against last month’s acquittal of the Timorese-born Australian woman Angelita Pires.

Ms Pires was found not guilty of charges of conspiring to kill East Timor’s President in an attack in February 2008.

A panel of three judges concluded there was not enough evidence to convict her.

One of the Australian lawyers acting for Ms Pires says the prosecution has lodged an appeal against her verdict.

Angelita Pires has described the appeal as ludicrous.

East Timor prosecutors appeal Pires verdict

Lawyers have confirmed that public prosecutors in East Timor have appealed against last month’s acquittal of the Timorese-born Australian woman Angelita Pires.

Ms Pires was found not guilty of charges of conspiring to kill East Timor president Jose Ramos-Horta in an attack in February 2008.

A panel of three judges concluded there was not enough evidence to convict her.

One of the Australian lawyers acting for Ms Pires says the prosecution has lodged an appeal against the verdict.

Ms Pires has described the appeal as ludicrous.

Supreme Court provides relief to Lalu Prasad in disproportionate assets case

New Delhi, Apr 1 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Thursday said the Government of Bihar has no authority to file an appeal against Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) supremo Lalu Prasad”s 2006 acquittal in a disproportionate assets case.

“The Bihar Government is not a competent authority to file an appeal in the case,” a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices R M Lodha and B S Chauhan said.

The apex court also set aside a Patna High Court decision admitting the appeal filed by Bihar Government against the acquittal of Lalu and his wife Rabri Devi in the case.

During a final hearing on March 10, the CBI stood by Lalu in the Supreme Court and opposed the Bihar Government””s decision to challenge his acquittal in a disproportionate assets case, an off-shoot of the 1995-96 fodder scam.

The CBI had booked Lalu and Rabri Devi on charges of amassing property worth Rs 46 lakh above their legal sources of income.

Lalu was sent to the Bihar military police guest house on judicial remand in July 1997 and again in October 1998. He spent a day in the Beur Jail in the disproportionate assets case in November 2000.

Lalu and Rabri Devi, however, were acquitted of all charges by Special CBI Judge Muni Lal Paswan in December 2006.

The Bihar Government challenged their acquittal in 2007. (ANI)

Past may catch up with crooks under Rann plan

South Australian Premier Mike Rann says a returned Labor government will allow the criminal past of some defendants to be presented as evidence during court proceedings.

Mr Rann says he will amend the state’s Evidence Act to allow juries to hear past histories of offenders in cases that involve violent crime or sex offences.

Labor’s proposed changes are part of its serious crime policy.

The state election on March 20 is turning into a tight contest, with some analysts predicting a hung parliament.

Mr Rann makes no apologies for wanting to change a fundamental tenet of the court process.

“In terms of juries, everyone gets really annoyed when we find out that juries and courts have not been given the past history of serious criminals,” he said.

“It is about really seeing a pattern of behaviour that we want – serious criminals like those who are violent or child offenders – the courts to know of their previous behaviour.

“I think the community is rightly outraged when in some cases an offender’s criminal past comes to light the day after a conviction or, even worse, the day after an acquittal.”

The South Australian Liberal Party was not available for comment on the proposal.

The state’s Commissioner for Victims Rights, Michael O’Connell, says victims are generally supportive of the idea to allow some criminal history to be presented at trial.

He says the proposal would restore some balance to court proceedings.

“Victims are often stunned and sometimes angry when they find out that the jury or the court are not going to be told about the accused person’s criminal history,” he said.

“Often the facts of a case are sanitised, coming as a result of an agreement that has been struck between the prosecution and the defence with little meaningful consultation with victims.

“Therefore the victims feel the jury is not getting to hear the whole truth and their verdict may be tainted.”

‘Dangerous’ reform

But civil libertarians say the Government’s proposal will undermine the justice system.

Chairman of the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee, George Mancini, says the changes go too far.

“People do change, or people have been in circumstances in which their past is no longer of any relevance or use in deciding what they have done today,” he said.

“I think it is a very potentially dangerous reform. The risk is that all you are doing is creating prejudice in the minds of people that if they have done it once, they will do it again.”

With less than a fortnight to go to the state poll, this is the first time law and order has been featured in the campaign.

The Government’s central theme has so far been job creation.

It is a change of tack for Labor, with the party now trying to wedge Liberal Leader Isobel Redmond who is a former lawyer and legal traditionalist.

Nithari victims’s relatives express outrage over Pander’s acquittal

New Delhi, Sep. 11 (ANI): The acquittal of Nithari killings accused Mohinder Singh Pandher in the Rimpa Haldar murder case has left relatives outraged and anguished.

“I will destroy this bungalow (Pandher’s residence) in one minute. I am ready to spend money to get justice,” said Anil Haldar, Rimpa’s father.

His reaction came after the Allahabad High Court acquitted Pandher for the murder of Rimpa, who was among the 19 people killed at the businessman’s home.

Haldar, a married woman, was called by Kohli to work as housemaid at the Pandher, and thereafter went missing.

The father of another victim said he would approach the country’s apex court for justice.

“We will go to Delhi and appeal in the Supreme Court because the government out here is corrupt,” said Jhabbu Lal, the father of Jyoti, a Nithari massacre victim.

Earlier this year, both Pandher and Koli were awarded capital punishment by a special court in Ghaziabad.

The Nithari killings came to light three years ago, leaving people across the country shocked.

The skeletal remains of the children were first discovered in a sewer behind Pandher’s plush D-5 bungalow in Noida’s Sector 31.The human skulls were stuffed in 57 gunny bags along with 700 bone pieces.

Special Judge Rema Jain completed the proceedings after re-cross examination of former Noida police officer Dinesh Yadav on January 27 and the recording of statements of Pandher and Kohli.

A total of 19 cases of killings were registered at the Noida police station in December 2006. All of them were transferred to the CBI for further investigation. (ANI)

Corruption cases against Pak PM’s wife withdrawn

Karachi, Sep. 5 (ANI): The corruption cases filed against Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s wife have been withdrawn.

Fouzia Yousuf Gilani and five others were accused of obtaining two loans from the Agricultural Development Bank for their companies in the late 1980s and not returning the money, The Dawn reports.

But the National Accountability Bureau which had filed the cases against Gilani, Syeda Samina Abrar, Anwar Nasreen, Ziaur Rehman, Khalid Hussain and Nasreen Munawar Chaudhry in 2000 told the court that the matter has been settled and charges withdrawn.

According to the prosecution, the accused, who were directors of the Pakistan Green Fertiliser, had obtained a loan of 71.163 million rupees from the ADBP in November 1987 and not returned the amount after which the National Accountability Bureau had filed a reference against them.

The second reference pertained to a loan of 100 million rupees taken from the bank in July 1989 for the Multan Edible Oil Extraction Company.

The court had dismissed applications for acquittal in July.

The MD of the firms, Munawar Hussain Sindhu, was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on March 10, 2001, while Gilani and others were awarded three-year terms in absentia for failing to appear before the court. (ANI)

Khairlanji case hearing to begin today

Mumbai, Aug 24 (ANI): Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court will start hearing the appeals filed by eight convicts of the Khairlanji Dalit killing case from today.

A division bench will comprise of Justices A P Lavande and P B Vairale.

In September last year, the trial court at Bhandara awarded capital punishment to six convicts, while two were given life imprisonment for killing four members of Bhotmange family.

The convicts are: Sakru Binjawar, Shatrughan Dhande, Vishwanath Dhande, Ramu Dhande, Jagdish Mandlekar, Prabhakar Mandlekar, Gopal Binjawar and Shishupal Dhande.

Three persons, Mahipal Dhande, Dharampal Dhande and Purushottam Titarmare, were acquitted for lack of evidence.

The CBI had filed an appeal seeking death sentence for Binjawar and Dhande, and reversal of acquittal of the trio.

The agency had said all the accused were convicted for same crime and hence deserve same punishment.

The High Court had asked the CBI to prepare a detailed chart-mentioning role of each of the accused in the case along with details of charges framed against them and supporting evidences produced before the trial court. (ANI)

Pak SC to hear petitions challenging Saeed’s acquittal today

Islamabad, July 13 (ANI): The Pakistan Supreme Court would start the hearing into the two separate petitions filed by the Punjab government and the federal government respectively challenging the acquittal of the Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmed today (Monday).

Challenging the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) verdict to release both leaders, of the banned terror outfit, the petition states that the judgment had emphasised a “faulty assertion” that the detaining authority had no evidence to justify the detention of the accused, The Daily Times reports.

The petitions said that the LHC’s decision highlights that the court didn’t consider the sensitivity of the case, even when there is a massive terror threat looming over the country.

On June 2, a full bench of the Lahore High Court had ordered Saeed’s release from house arrest on the basis of a habeas corpus petition filed by his lawyer.

The high court said that it had not received substantial evidence to continue the detention of Saeed, the prime accused of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks.

The court also ordered the release of Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmad, one of the top leaders of the JuD.

Saeed was put under house arrest on December 11 last year, day after the JuD, the political wing of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) was declared a terrorist group by the United Nations (UN). (ANI)

MJ’s body stored in LA crypt until family decides what to do with his remains

New York, July 10 (ANI): If reports are to be believed, late King of Pop Michael Jackson’s kin have stored his body in Motown maestro Berry Gordy’s crypt in the Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles, until they sort out what to do with the superstar’s remains.

Sources have revealed that Jackson’s brother Jermaine and father Joseph are insistent the Gloved One be buried at Neverland Ranch so that the family can profit from a proposed Graceland-style museum there, a process that may take years.

“Jermaine is the one that wants him at Neverland-he and Joseph — because of the whole Elvis thing and the money potential. They are seeing dollar signs,” the New York Post quoted a family source as saying.

On the other hand, adds the source, Jackson’s mother Katherine and most of his siblings want that his body be laid to rest elsewhere out of respect for his wish, following his acquittal on child-molestation charges, to never return to Neverland.

The source says that her son’s physical purgatory has left Katherine shaken.

“She is still upset that Michael isn’t buried and he is at Gordy’s spot in Forest Lawn. This fighting has to stop. We can never unite, and that’s an injustice,” the source said.

The newspaper report suggests that the fight between the clan has become so contentious that Jermaine rode in a separate Rolls-Royce limousine to Jacko’s public memorial at Los Angeles’ Staples Center, even though his mother had wanted all the brothers to ride together.

Meanwhile, most of the kids and Katherine are said to be onboard with a proposed documentary about the family, which can earn them 20 million dollars.

“They’re doing this documentary because with the kids, they will get 20 million dollars,” the source said, adding that Katherine was pushing all her children to be a part of it. (ANI)

Jackson had hired renowned firms to assess his public impression

Washington, July 6 (ANI): Michael Jackson had hired two renowned firms while handling child-molestation charges in the early 2000s, so that he could have insights into how the public viewed him.

The late King of Pop’s attorneys had roped in The Polling Company, a well-known Washington firm, to learn about the public impressions of the star.

Jackson’s legal team had also teamed up with Dezenhall Resources, a secretive crisis communications firm, in the months before the allegations of molestation were made public to prepare defense strategies against lines of media inquiry and attacks.

“The crisis-management objective was acquittal through reasonable doubt, and it was achieved. Restoring the iconic status of his name was never on the table,” the Politico quoted Eric Dezenhall, co-founder of the firm, as saying.

Kellyanne Conway, president and CEO of The Polling Company, also said that her poll results found that the claims made during the child-molestation trial were barely affecting the public’s perception of the singer who had become a national celebrity as early as at the age of five. (ANI)

Pak government to file separate petition challenging Saeed’s acquittal

Islamabad, July 5 (ANI): Following the Punjab government’s decision to challenge the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) verdict of releasing the Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) chief Hafeez Muhammad Saeed and Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmad, both of whom are accused of masterminding the 26/11 Mumbai carnage, now the federal government has also decided to file a separate petition against the verdict.

The Pakistan government is likely to file the petition on Monday, July 6.

“We are filing the appeal because we are not satisfied with the order of the LHC. The federal government’s challenge was almost ready, but it could not file the petition on Saturday as the representative of Punjab government was not available on time,” The Dawn quoted the Deputy Advocate General, Shah Khawar, as saying.

On June 2, a full bench of the Lahore High Court had ordered Saeed’s release from house arrest on the basis of a habeas corpus petition filed by his lawyer.

The high court said that it had not received substantial evidence to continue the detention of Saeed, the prime accused of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks.

The court also ordered the release of another JuD leader Colonel (retired) Nazir Ahmad.

Saeed was put under house arrest on December 11 last year, day after the JuD, the political wing of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) was declared a terrorist group by the United Nations (UN). (ANI)

‘Broke’ Jackson ‘performed secret gigs for Arab sheikhs for $2.5M’

Washington, July 2 (ANI): Cash-strapped Michael Jackson used to perform private one-night concerts for Arab sheikhs, and charge them 2.5 million dollars a time, say reports.

The King of Pop, who was nearly bankrupt at the time of his death, was said to have relied on handouts from his friend Abdullah bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the son of the king of Bahrain.

“He was virtually insolvent. Since his 2005 acquittal on sexual abuse charges, he initially supported himself at the largesse of Abdullah bin Hamad Al Khalifa, son of Bahrain’s king,” Contactmusic quoted DailyBeast.com as saying.

“When that money pipeline was cut off, The Daily Beast learned that Jackson resorted to doing one-night gigs for private parties for Arab sheikhs and Russians in London.

“These gigs, I am told, commanded up to 2.5 million dollars for an hour performance or sometimes were bartered in exchange for works of art,” it was added. (ANI)

Government of India considering law to protect witnesses

New Delhi June 23(ANI): The Government of India is considering passing a law, which would provide for protection of witnesses.

Union Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily said here today that witness protection mechanism should be made part of the criminal justice system.

As Chairman of the Administrative Reforms Commission during the previous term of the UPA Government, Moily had recommended the reforms to criminal justice system, guaranteeing anonymity of witnesses and for protection of witnesses in specified cases.

Moily said the Law Ministry would interact with the Home Ministry in bringing about the changes.

Recently the Supreme Court had observed that it was practically impossible to provide security to every witness, considering the large population of the country and that over three crore cases were pending in the courts.

The need for a witness protection mechanism has been debated for a long time, especially after the trial court’s acquittal of all accused in the Jessica Lal murder case in 2006. (ANI)

Turkish writer Gursel rejects allegations of insulting Mohammed

Istanbul – Turkish writer Nedim Gursel appeared in court Tuesday to reject allegations of insulting Islam in his latest novel, “Allah’s Daughters.”

Gursel, who makes his home in France, called the court proceedings regrettable and irritating and insisted that his book did not undermine religious values.

The proceedings were adjourned until June 26.

After the Tuesday session, he told the German Press Agency dpa in Istanbul that “I had expected an acquittal…I have come to defend my novel.”

He conceded that after the court adjournment, there was “reason for concern.”

Gursel, is along with Yasar Kemal and Nobel Prize-winning novelist Orhan Pamuk is among the leading contemporary Turkish novelists. His works have often been censored in Turkey, especially during the period of the military dictatorship in the 1980s.

“I thought those times were over,” he commented about the censorship. If Turkey wanted to be accepted into the European Union, it must respect the freedom of opinion, he said.

“Allah’s Daughters” takes place in the 7th Century and raises questions about faith and violence in Islam. Gursel said the book is done with respect shown to the faithful.

In the court proceedings, Gursel is also accused of insulting the Prophet Mohammed and his wives. (dpa)

Sobhraj fires principal lawyer for ‘conflict of interests’

Kathmandu, April 14 (IANS) Fighting a tortuous battle in Nepal’s Supreme Court to overturn a murder conviction that sent him behind bars for life, Charles Sobhraj has fired his principal lawyer, accusing the latter of trying to jeopardise his chances of acquittal.

Basant Bhandari, one of the top lawyers of Nepal who had been defending Sobhraj since the latter’s arrest from a Kathmandu casino almost six years ago, received a letter Monday, asking him to withdraw from the case due to a ‘conflict of interests’.

Moving with lightning speed in spite of being lodged in prison, Sobhraj has now appointed in Bhandari’s place another senior lawyer, Ram Prasad Shrestha.

Shrestha was a member of the controversial Rayamajhi Commission that was formed in 2006 to bring to justice the people responsible for the attack on democracy during the army-backed regime of King Gyanendra but could not punish a single person.

‘I was shocked by Bhandari’s line of defence,’ Sobhraj said in a message sent to IANS through his lawyers.

‘First, he tried to alienate judges by calling them incompetent and then used the assumption that I could have come to Nepal in 1975 when I have always denied that.’

The new twist comes after the last hearing in a court of appeals Thursday. The Patan Appellate Court is hearing arguments by the state as well as Sobhraj’s lawyers to determine if the Frenchman had come to Nepal in 1975 using the forged passport of a Dutch tourist.

If they find him guilty, it will pave the way for a much more serious conviction. Sobhraj, who had never been convicted of murder before, would then be regarded as having used the clandestine visit to murder an American backpacker Connie Jo Bronzich.

The Frenchman’s feathers were badly ruffled by Bhandari who told the court during Thursday’s hearing that even if it was assumed that his client had visited Kathmandu in 1975, he could still not be convicted now for using a forged passport since the immigration laws of the 70s have been scrapped.

Sobhraj is alleging that Bhandari became hostile over a monetary dispute, triggered by the suspicion that Sobhraj was paying more money to his new lawyer Shakuntala Thapa.

Thapa is the mother of Sobhraj’s 20-year-old fiancee, Nihita Biswas.